Currency processing system with fitness detection

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8559694
  • Patent Number
    8,559,694
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 27, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 15, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
In one aspect, a method of processing currency in a currency processing machine includes the act of retrieving, from a plurality of input currency bills, characteristic information from each of the bills, the characteristic information itself including at least a first characteristic information relating to fitness. The method also includes the act of assigning to each currency bill one of a plurality of fitness types and fitness levels relating to the first characteristic information of the bill, at least one of the fitness types and the fitness levels being defined by a user. The method also includes the act of outputting each currency bill along one of a plurality of output paths designated by the user to receive currency bills, the output path having a fitness type and/or fitness level assigned to the currency bill.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to the field of currency handling systems and, more particularly, to methods and devices for determining the fitness of currency bills or other conditions of the bills, as well as for methods and devices for processing, packaging, and tracking both fit and unfit bills.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A variety of techniques and apparatuses have been used to satisfy the requirements of automated currency processing. As the number of businesses that deal with large quantities of paper currency grow, such as banks, casinos and armored carriers, these businesses are continually requiring not only that their currency be processed more quickly but, also, processed with greater accuracy and with more efficiency.


Commonly, in the processing of currency at a bank, for example, cash deposits are first received and verified by a bank teller. The cash deposit is later sorted according to denomination. Finally, the sorted bills are bundled or strapped in stacks of a predetermined number of bills (often one hundred bills).


Select bills are often removed from circulation based on minimum bill fitness criteria established by the Federal Reserve, such as that set forth in Operating Circular No. 2, dated Jan. 8, 1998, and “Fitness Standards For Federal Reserve Notes,” promulgated by the Currency Technology Office of the Federal Reserve on Jul. 22, 2004. Fitness is one factor for determining if a bill should be taken out of circulation. The Federal Reserve requires that deposits of currency must be in bundles of 1,000 notes of the same denomination in ten equal straps of 100 notes and the depositing banks are further required to piece count, verify authenticity, and assemble fit, unfit, and non-machinable currency prior to deposit. Banks are not credited the amount of the deposit until accepted by the Federal Reserve and the credit is subject to any difference, counterfeit, or other irregularity detected when the deposit is verified by the Federal Reserve.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention is generally directed to a currency processing device comprising fitness detection capabilities and methods related thereto configured to permit variability in sorting and/or packaging capabilities and to optionally permit tracking of individual bills processed thereby. In at least some aspects, the currency processing device is a user-configurable currency processing device configured to permit an authorized user to alter various settings. For example, in such a user-configurable currency processing device, the user may permitted to alter fitness detection settings, fitness detection routines, fitness detection characteristics, fitness detection outputs, and/or any characteristics of any other system which may be related or tangentially related to fitness detection (e.g., the user may set the currency processing device to reduce a transport speed responsive to a particular condition).


In one embodiment, a currency processing device includes an input receptacle adapted to receive input currency bills, a reading device adapted to retrieve at least a first characteristic information relating to fitness and a second characteristic information from each of the currency bills, and a transport mechanism adapted to serially transport the currency bills from the input receptacle to the reading device and then to transport individual ones of the bills to a designated one of a plurality of output receptacles. A memory device is provided to store user-definitions and/or user settings for at least the first characteristic information. An input/output (I/O) device configured at least to receive a user input is also provided. A processor is further provided to process the characteristic information retrieved for each of the currency bills by the reading device and assign the currency bill to a category defined by a user to correspond to the processed characteristic information. A controller is also provided to discharge each currency bill from the transport mechanism to another transport mechanism and/or an output receptacle designated by a user to receive that category of currency bills.


In another embodiment, a method of processing currency in a currency processing machine includes the act of retrieving, from a plurality of input currency bills, characteristic information from each of the bills, the characteristic information itself including at least a first characteristic information relating to fitness (e.g., such as soiled, torn, having holes, excessive ink wear, folded corners, etc.). The method also includes the act of assigning to each currency bill one of a plurality of fitness types and fitness levels relating to the first characteristic information of the bill, at least one of the fitness types and the fitness levels (i.e., the fitness type(s) and/or fitness level(s)) being defined by a user. In some embodiments, the method also includes the act of outputting each currency bill along one of a plurality of output paths designated by the user to receive currency bills, the output path having a fitness type and/or fitness level assigned to the currency bill.


In yet another embodiment, a method for tracking currency includes the acts of processing a plurality of bills to determine fitness and retrieving, from the plurality of processed bills, characteristic information from each of the bills, the characteristic information comprising at least a first characteristic information relating to a bill fitness and a second characteristic relating to a bill serial number. The method of tracking currency further includes the acts of assigning the first characteristic information to one of a plurality of levels of the bill fitness defect selected by a user and comparing the second characteristic information to a stored plurality of related characteristic information from a database of processed bills.


The above summary of the present invention is not intended to represent each embodiment, or every aspect, of the present invention. Additional features and benefits of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description, figures, and claims set forth below.


Other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description in conjunction with the drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1(
a)-(b) are block diagrams illustrating examples of currency processing systems according to at least some aspects of the present concepts.



FIGS. 2(
a)-2(b) depict examples of user-definable fitness settings in accord with at least some aspects of the present concepts.



FIG. 3 is a front view of a currency processing device having multiple output receptacles for use in accord with one aspect of the present concepts.



FIG. 4 is a perspective view of the device of FIG. 3.



FIGS. 5(
a)-(i) show various embodiments of aspects of the present concepts.





While the present concepts are susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail herein. It should be understood, however, that the present concepts are not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the present concepts are to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the present concepts as defined by the appended claims.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATED EMBODIMENTS


FIGS. 1(
a)-(b) show functional block diagrams illustrating a currency processing system 10 according to at least some aspects of embodiments of the present concepts. The system 10 includes a bill accepting station 12 where stacks of currency bills that need to be identified, authenticated, and/or counted are positioned. Bills are picked out or separated, one bill at a time, from the accepting station 12 and sequentially relayed by a bill transport mechanism 14, along a transport path 19, and to a reading device 24.


In the embodiment depicted in FIG. 1(a), the reading device 24 comprises a first station 25 having one or more detectors (e.g., an optical scanhead) to identify the denomination and/or series of the respective bills, and a subsequent second station 30 and third station 40, respectively, having one or more detectors to evaluate the fitness and/or authenticity of the bills. Following processing in the first, second, and third stations 25, 30, 40, a bill is passed to a specified pocket or receptacle amongst a plurality of pockets 60, the specified pocket corresponding not only to the particular denomination of the bill, but also to a control system instruction or program input by a user, which characterizes the fitness and authenticity of the bill. The reading device 24 may comprise a unitary device (i.e., a single device or station) or may comprise a plurality of disparate devices used sequentially, such as shown in the example of FIG. 1, or even a plurality of devices used simultaneously in combination. According to at least some embodiments, a transport speed of the bills, and a corresponding processing speed, may be set to any transport speed between about 800 bills per minute (bpm) and 1600 bpm (e.g., 1000 bpm, 1200 bpm, 1500 bpm, 1600 bpm), although higher and lower transport speeds are certainly within the present concepts (e.g., 200 bpm, 1800 bpm, 2400 bpm, etc.)


The currency processing system 10 shown in FIG. 1(a) includes denomination discrimination, fitness, and authentication detectors in the first, second, and third stations 25, 30, 40, respectively, and is adapted as a currency discriminator as heretofore described. Nevertheless, it will be appreciated that the system 10 shown in FIG. 1(a) may optionally omit the first station 25 such as where the denomination and/or series of the respective bills is already known (e.g., the machine is used to pass only a single denomination) or is not required, or omit the second station 30 or third station 40 where either the fitness or authenticity does not require determination, such as is shown in the example of FIG. 1(b). In FIG. 1(b), the reading device 24 comprises only a fitness detector 30, as described herein.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 1(a), the first station 25 may comprise one or more detectors which detect one or more types of characteristic information of a bill. According to some embodiments, detectors may be configured to detect an intensity of reflected light and/or a color. A plurality of detectors may also be used in parallel or in combination. One example of a detection scheme is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,992,825, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The first station 25 comprises, in one aspect of the present concepts, an optical detector with at least one light source directing light downwardly onto the bill transport path so as to illuminate a substantially rectangular light strip upon a currency bill positioned on the transport path below the detector. Light reflected off the illuminated strip is sensed by a photodetector positioned above the strip and the analog output of the photodetector is converted into a digital signal by means of an analog-to-digital (ADC) convertor unit whose output is fed as a digital input to a central processing unit (CPU) 16.


The detector in the first station 25 may comprise, for example, a scanhead or scanheads employing a variety of detection means such as, but not limited to, magnetic or optical sensors. For example, a variety of currency characteristics can be measured using magnetic sensing. These include detection of patterns of changes in magnetic flux (U.S. Pat. No. 3,280,974), patterns of vertical grid lines in the portrait area of bills (U.S. Pat. No. 3,870,629), the presence of a security thread (U.S. Pat. No. 5,151,257), total amount of magnetizable material of a bill (U.S. Pat. No. 4,617,458), patterns from sensing the strength of magnetic fields along a bill (U.S. Pat. No. 4,593,184), and other patterns and counts from scanning different portions of the bill such as the area in which the denomination is written out (U.S. Pat. No. 4,314,473). With regard to optical sensing, a variety of currency characteristics can be measured such as detection of density (U.S. Pat. No. 4,381,447), color (U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,490,846; 3,496,370; 3,480,785), length and thickness (U.S. Pat. No. 4,255,651), the presence of a security thread (U.S. Pat. No. 5,151,257) and holes (U.S. Pat. No. 4,381,447), and other patterns of reflectance and transmission (U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,496,370; 3,679,314; 3,870,629; 4,179,685). Color detection techniques may employ color filters, colored lamps, and/or dichroic beamsplitters (U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,841,358; 4,658,289; 4,716,414; 4,825,246, 4,992,825 and EP 325,364). An optical sensing system may, for example, use ultraviolet light (U.S. Pat. No. 5,640,463) and/or infrared light. Each of the aforementioned patents is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


In addition to magnetic and optical sensing, other techniques of detecting characteristic information of currency include electrical conductivity sensing, capacitive sensing (U.S. Pat. No. 5,122,713 [watermark, security thread]; U.S. Pat. No. 3,764,899 [thickness]; U.S. Pat. No. 3,815,021 [dielectric properties]; U.S. Pat. No. 5,151,257 [security thread]), and mechanical sensing (U.S. Pat. No. 4,381,447 [limpness]; U.S. Pat. No. 4,255,651 [thickness]). Each of the aforementioned patents is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


Likewise, the denominating, sorting, filtering and/or authenticating tools and techniques used in various commercial currency processing machines such as those of Cummins, DeLaRue, Glory, Giesecke & Devrient, or others, may be employed in conjunction with the present concepts.


In the currency processing system 10 of FIG. 1, the bill transport path may be defined in such a way that the transport mechanism 14 moves currency bills with the narrow dimension of the bills parallel to the transport path and the scan direction. Alternatively, the transport mechanism 14 may be configured to move currency bills with the long dimension of the bills parallel to the transport path and the scan direction. The scan direction is not necessarily dependent upon the orientation of the currency bill. As a currency bill moves on the transport path 19 adjacent the first station 25 detector(s), the detector functions to detect or sense a characteristic of the bill (e.g., denomination) positioned in a preferred orientation relative to the detector. According to some embodiments, variations in reflected light from a narrow dimension of the bills permits distinguishing, with a high degree of confidence, currencies of varying denomination. The analog signals output by the first station 25 detector are output to an ADC and then to CPU 16 for processing. One example of the use of such reflected light data to distinguish features between characteristic patterns for different currency denominations and/or series is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,295,196, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


In order to ensure strict correspondence between reflectance samples obtained by narrow dimension scanning of successive bills, the initiation of the reflectance sampling process is preferably controlled through the CPU 16 by means of an control system 15 linked to the bill transport mechanism 14. The control system may comprise, according to some embodiments, an optical encoder 15 which tracks a degree of movement of a drive member and, hence, is able to provide the CPU 16 with information indicative of a corresponding position of each transported bill, such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,295,196, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


Fit currency is generally defined by the Federal Reserve as a bill (note) that is suitable for continued circulation and is sufficiently clean to allow its genuineness and denomination to be readily ascertained. Likewise, unfit currency is generally defined by the Federal Reserve to be a bill (note) that is not suitable for further circulation because of its physical condition, such as being torn, dirty, limp, worn or defaced.


For example, the Federal Reserve has currently stated that a U.S. bill is considered unfit for redistribution if it has a length less than 151 mm (with greater than 50% of the note present) or a width less than 63 mm (with greater than 50% of the note present). A U.S. bill is considered unfit for redistribution if it has a total area of holes greater than 19 mm2, which includes open tears on the short edges, the hole areas being additive. A U.S. bill is further considered unfit for redistribution if it has a total tear depth greater than 6 mm, along the long edges or tears with a minimum length of 3 mm and a minimum width of 2 mm, the tear depths being additive.


The Federal Reserve further considers a U.S. bill to be unfit for redistribution if it has one or more missing corners greater than 72 mm2, missing corners with a minimum area of 26 mm2 and a minimum horizontal or vertical dimension of 5 mm, at least one folded corner >182 mm2, 4 folded corners regardless of area, or folded corners with a minimum area of 26 mm2 and a minimum horizontal or vertical dimension of 5 mm. A U.S. bill is also considered unfit for redistribution if it has a tape length greater than 9 mm, with a minimum thickness of 0.05 mm along the long dimension of the note.


A fitness detector 30 may therefore be adapted to detect any number of predetermined conditions of the bill including, but not limited to, thickness, limpness, dirtiness, holes, tears, tape, staples, graffiti, ink wear, torn corners, folded corners, paper clips and/or other criteria for making a determination concerning the bill, as generally noted below.


Thickness detection may be accomplished using a variety of devices and methods. According to some embodiments, discussed below, thickness detection may be accomplished by using opposing rollers to measure displacement. An example of thickness detection is disclosed in co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/379,365, filed Mar. 4, 2003 to Ken Maier et al., which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Alternative devices and methods for measuring thickness include capacitance thickness detectors, ultrasound thickness detectors, reflected and/or transmitted light measurement detectors (e.g., lasers, IR light, UV light, visible light, etc.) suitable to detect one or more particular wavelengths of light, capacitance array detectors, overall transparency detection. These, or other, devices could be used over an entirety of the currency bill or other document, or only on a selected portion or portions thereof.


An example of limpness detection is also disclosed in co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/379,365, filed Mar. 4, 2003 to Ken Maier et al., which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


Fitness detector 30 could also be adapted to detect the presence or absence of one or more inks and to detect characteristics of inks on the bills. For example, fitness detector 30 could be used to detect graffiti or ink stains, such as by identification of both marks that have high contrast, such as dark ink on white areas of the bills, or by markings that have a low contrast, such as markings in dark ink on the portrait area. If the location or extent of the graffiti or ink stain exceeds a threshold, the bill may be deemed unfit. The fitness detector could optionally characterize the ink, such as to identify characteristics of particular inks used in national currencies, the presence or absence of security inks (e.g., detonated ink charges placed in money bags during a robbery), or degradation of the ink (e.g., ink wear). Sensors for such forms of ink and graffiti detection could include, for example, conventional sensors for detecting reflected and/or transmitted visible light, reflected and/or transmitted multiple wavelength light, reflected and/or transmitted light of a specified wavelength or range(s) of wavelengths, and graphite detection.


The fitness detector 30 could also be adapted to detect soiling through sensors adapted to detect reflected color, transmitted color, reflected black and white, or transmitted black and white. An example of soil detection is disclosed in co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/379,365, filed Mar. 4, 2003 to Ken Maier et al., incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Fitness detector 30 could even be configured to detect small amounts of foreign substances such as, but not limited to, food, bleach, drugs, blood, biological agents, chemicals, bacteria, explosives or gases indicative thereof. Fitness detector 30 could further be adapted to detect geometric or volumetric characteristics including, but not limited to, bill size and/or weight discrepancies, edge wear deterioration, edge wear distortion, bill transparency, and printing defects or errors (e.g., registration, printing clarity, overall print quality). Still further, the fitness detector 30 could be configured to detect holes, tears and/or missing corners through the use of one or more sensors configured to detect transmitted and/or reflected visible light, transmitted and/or reflected IR or multi-frequency IR light, transmitted and/or reflected UV or multi-frequency UV light. Additionally or alternatively, capacitive sensors could be used to measure the overall mass of the document or air pressure or vacuum sensors could be employed to measure how much air passes through a bill.


Fitness detector 30 could also comprise an imaging device for acquiring a document image or currency bill image upon which fitness determinations may be based. A camera or image based system may include, for example, convention charge-coupled devices (CCD's), cameras, video recorders, and stereo vision camera systems. A stereo vision camera system may itself include, for example, a calibrated and matched pair of high sensitivity cameras (e.g., CCD). A laser may also optionally be employed to provide a depth or range of any given point on a measured currency bill to a predetermined coordinate. In at least one embodiment, a laser could be used to map a plurality of points on a surface of a currency bill. In some embodiments, two lasers could be used to map a plurality of points on both upper and lower surfaces of a currency bill and, in combination with processor 16, to determine a thickness of the currency bill to the extent that the plurality of points on the upper and lower surfaces of the currency bill are opposite to one another across a thickness of the bill.


In accord with the present concepts, each of the aforementioned fitness defects, such as thickness, limpness, soiling, stains, etc., may further be assigned a plurality of levels in accord with the present concepts, as opposed to a typical and simplistic pass/fail assessment of a bill. Thus, the currency processing system 10 in accord with the present concepts permits a user to assign multiple levels to any desired fitness defect. By way of example, the system 10 may be adapted to permit a user concerned with the limpness and wear of processed bills to define or assign a plurality of limpness levels and a plurality of wear levels. The present concepts further include the expression of combinations and sub-combinations thereof and are adaptable to suit a user's preferences.



FIG. 2(
a) shows one possible configuration in accord with at least some embodiments of the present concepts. In FIG. 2(a), a user has designated four defect types for detection (Soil, Tears, Holes, and Limpness) from a larger set of available defect types for detection. FIG. 2(a) also shows the each of the selected defects has been assigned a plurality of levels or grades. Turning first to the various selected Grades, the user has selected and/or defined a top-tier of “Mint” to denote bills having no detectable soil, tears, or holes, and having a limpness detector output voltage greater than or equal to 1.50 V. The output voltage of the limpness detector is an arbitrary quantity and is merely intended to represent, in this example, possible outputs of a limpness detector that may be categorized and is not intended to impart any limitations to any particular configuration of limpness detector or range of outputs thereof. One example of a limpness detector is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,365,508 to Loftus, issued Dec. 28, 1982, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Likewise, the user has designated “Grade A” to correspond to bills having soilage of less than 1 mm2, tears less than 1 mm, holes less than 1 mm2, and a limpness detector output greater than or equal to 1.25 V. FIG. 2(a) shows “Grade B” to correspond to bills having soilage of less than 3 mm2, tears less than 3 mm, holes less than 10 mm2, and a limpness detector output greater than or equal to 1.00 V. “Grade C” is shown to correspond to bills having soilage of less than 6 mm2, tears less than 6 mm, holes less than 19 mm2, and a limpness detector output greater than or equal to 0.75 V. “Grade D” denotes unfit bills and, in FIG. 2(a), corresponds to bills having soilage greater than or equal to 6 mm2, tears greater than or equal to 6 mm, holes greater than or equal to 19 mm2, and a limpness detector output less than 0.75 V.


Bill processing, in at least some aspects of the present concepts, may thus include one or more categories, subcategories, pointers, and/or relational definitions. For example, FIG. 2(a) also shows that the user has defined, or may define, the acceptance criteria for various defect types into a plurality of levels. In FIG. 2(a), the acceptance criteria relating to the “Mint” and “Grade A” categories noted above have been combined into a broader category of “Level 1”. Likewise, the acceptance criteria relating to the “Grade B” and “Grade C” categories have been combined into a broader category of “Level 2” and the acceptance criteria relating to the “Grade D” category is classified as “Level 3”. In short, a user may define any number of categories, subcategories, pointers, and/or relational definitions to characterize measured defect characteristics. As another example, FIG. 2(b) shows that several user-defined Grades have been further defined and/or related to include several Levels therewithin (e.g., Grade A includes Levels 1, 2 for Soil, Holes, and Limpness). FIG. 2(b) also shows that a defined Level (e.g., Level 2) may be defined to span several Grades (e.g., Grade B and Grade C for the defect of Limpness).


In at least some embodiments, the bills are assigned the grade, level and/or rating corresponding to the lowest denominator. In other words, when each of the defects are compared against the ranges noted in FIG. 2, the category ultimately assigned to a bill would be the lowest category that would simultaneously satisfy all of the criteria for the category. Thus, if a particular bill had a soilage level of less than 1 mm2 (i.e., Grade A), no measurable tears (i.e., Grade A), a hole less than 1 mm2 (i.e., Grade A) but possessed a limpness detector output of 1.05 V (i.e., Grade B), the bill would be assigned an overall rating of Grade B. In some alternative embodiments, the user may elect to assign the overall rating based on another paradigm, such as a weighted rating, or may elect to value or devalue various characteristics relative to one another.


It will be understood that the fitness detector 30 may include one or more detectors arranged to determine a particular fitness criteria and may include sufficient detectors to detect each and every fitness criteria currently recognized or hereinafter devised or imposed. It is also to be understood that the aforementioned sensors may be used as individual sensors or may be combined in various combinations to identify or characterize a designated fitness, defect, and/or authentication characteristic.


In addition to typical fitness features, some of which are noted above, a currency processing system 10 in accord with the present concepts may include a counterfeit detector 40 to detect the presence or absence of one or more counterfeit protective features incorporated into a bill. Examples of conventional counterfeiting features which may be advantageously sensed by the counterfeit detector 40 include magnetic features, such as ferrous oxide inks or coded or magnetic threads, infrared (IR) features (e.g., multi-frequency detection, optical pattern detection, and IR transparency), ultraviolet (UV) detection (e.g., reflected UV, through-UV, and fluorescence), and visible features (e.g., polyester fiber strip having data embedded thereon, silk embedded fibers, extremely fine-type printing). UV detection in a counterfeit detector is disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,748,101 to Jones, et al., which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein. IR detection in a counterfeit detector is disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,731,785 to Mennie, et al., which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein. Magnetic feature detection is disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,810,137 to Jones, et al., which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.


Additional examples of conventional counterfeiting features which may be advantageously sensed by the counterfeit detector 40 include thread or foil detection, fluorescence detection, hologram/kintogram detection, window detection, and Mylar detection. Still additional examples include color shifting ink detection, raised ink detection corresponding to intaglio printing, and raised bill detection (e.g., genuine $20 corners attached to a genuine $1 bill).


Still further, the counterfeit detector 40 could be configured to permit watermark detection, such as graphic watermarks, bar code watermarks, and watermarks most likely to be detected using thru-light imaging, or to permit EURion Anti-Copy Detection or similar technology utilizing a plurality of marks (e.g., circles) arranged within bank bills in a predetermined arrangement or constellation. The counterfeit detector 40 could further include scent detection to identify characteristic signatures of chemicals emitted by various kinds of ink or identifier substances that are used in genuine currency and can be an effective way of identifying counterfeits. The counterfeit detector 40 could further include microwave feature detection, X-Ray feature detection, electro-luminescence detection, intaglio print detection, micro-perforation detection, embedded fiber detection. In view of the above, one or more counterfeit detectors 40 could be provided in combination with one or more fitness detectors 30.


Still further, a tracking system 50 could be implemented in combination with one or more counterfeit detectors 40 and/or fitness detectors 30. Tracking of bills or other documents by the tracking system 50 could be accomplished by recording part of, or the entirety of, the serial number, bar code, or other identifying information that would uniquely denote a particular bill. According to some embodiments, this tracking information could be used to implement a nation-wide data base of serial numbers or identifiers that can be used to periodically track bills as they move around the country (i.e., as they are processed by different devices according to an embodiment of the present invention which are connected to a network or database bearing the tracking information). When implemented in combination with the fitness detector 30, the tracking system 50 can permit not only the bill to be tracked and recorded, but also the condition of the bill.


Radio frequency imbedded devices (RFIDs) present another opportunity for tracking and tracking system 50 could be adapted to include a system for tracking currency based on individual tracking tags or devices.


U.S. Patent No. 6,311,819 B1, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, describes a multiple pocket (multi-pocket) currency processing device including, for example, 3, 4 and 6 pockets, which can be employed in various embodiments of the presently disclosed currency processing system 10. Multi-pocket currency processing devices or multi-pocket sorters (hereinafter collectively referred to as “MPS”) in accord with the present concepts may comprise a greater number or lesser number of pockets and the number of pockets is not limited.


Referring now to FIGS. 3 and 4, there is shown a currency processing device 100 having a plurality of output pockets 102a-h (hereinafter “MPS” for multi-pocket sorter) used in an embodiment of currency processing system 10. The MPS 100 illustrated in FIGS. 3-4 includes eight output pockets 102a-h: two upper output pockets 102a, b and six lower output pockets 102c-h. Further, modular lower output pockets (not shown) may be added to the MPS 100 to increase the number of lower output pockets, such as to add pockets 102i-k (not shown). Each of the lower output pockets 102c-h includes an escrow region 104 (shown with respect to lower output pocket 102h) for receiving and stacking currency bills and a storage cassette 106 for holding stacks of processed currency bills. In FIG. 4, a desktop computer 116 is shown disposed within an opening in the currency processing machine. Currency bills are transported to a particular one of the escrow regions 104 and are stacked therein.


At specified times or on the occurrence of specific events, currency bills stacked in an escrow region 104 may be moved into the corresponding storage cassette 106. According to one embodiment, each storage cassette 106 is capable of holding up to approximately one thousand currency bills.


The MPS 100 is capable of sorting currency bills according to denomination into each of the output pockets. Using United States currency bills as an example, a stack of mixed bills is received in an input receptacle 108. Bills are transported, one at a time, from the input receptacle 108 through an evaluation region 110 by a transport mechanism 112 to the plurality of output pockets 102a-h. In sorting the currency bills, the evaluation region 110 identifies the denomination of each of the currency bills and the transport mechanism delivers each currency bill to a particular one of the lower output pockets 102c-h. In some embodiments, the device 100 sorts bills according to denomination (e.g., U.S. $1 bills into lower output pocket 102c, U.S. $5 bills into lower output pocket 102d, etc.), while currency bills triggering error signals, such as no call or suspect document error signals, are off-sorted to upper output pockets 102a-b.


Numerous other operational alternatives are available to an operator of the MPS, including fit/unfit sorting. For example, the first upper output pocket 102a can be used to receive currency bills triggering no call error signals and the second upper output pocket 102b can be used to receive currency bills triggering suspect document error signals. Many other alternative operation modes and examples thereof are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,398,000 to Jenrick et al. and 6,460,705 to Hallowell, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


In some embodiments, the MPS includes a currency bill facing mechanism 114, interposed in the transport mechanism 112, intermediate the currency bill evaluation region 110 and the lower output pockets 102c-h that is capable of rotating a bill approximately 180° so that the face orientation of the currency bill is reversed. The leading edge of the bill (the wide dimension of the bill according to one embodiment) remains constant while the bill is rotated approximately 180° about an axis parallel to the narrow dimension of the bill) so that the face orientation of the bill is reversed. Further details of the operational and mechanical aspects a bill facing mechanism for use in the MPS 100 are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,074,334 to Mennie et al. and 6,371,303 to Klein et al., each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


Various fitness detectors 30, counterfeit detectors 40, and tracking systems 50 can be employed in the currency handling methods and devices disclosed herein including without limitation that currency handling system represented in FIGS. 3-4 and variations thereof, as well as other compatible devices that will be apparent to those of skill in the art.


In accord with the present concepts, following identification of fit and unfit genuine notes, the fit and unfit genuine bills can be sorted in various modes based on a users' needs and requirements. These modes could be user-definable and saved to a currency processing system 10 memory 18 or remote memory device (e.g., through I/O 17) so the various user modes could be called up at any time by a user. In various exemplary modes, the bills could be sorted by fitness levels and/or fitness defect, and output to pockets 60, as generally shown in the examples of FIGS. 5(a)-(c).


Fitness levels and/or fitness defects can be established for each of the aforementioned fitness criteria, or other designated fitness criteria selected by the user of the currency processing system 10 (e.g., MPS 100), by the user and/or by the manufacturer or distributor of the currency handling device 10. According to at least some embodiments, fitness level definitions can be changed by updating related definitions and/or parameters stored in memory 18 or other local or remote memory device. In still other embodiments, bills could be selectively sorted, for example, based on the fitness level and/or fitness defect.


In FIG. 5(a), an embodiment is shown wherein a range of notes of mixed denomination ($1, $5, $10, $20) may be sorted and categorized as “fit” or “unfit”. In this example, fit $1 notes are sorted into pocket 102a, fit $5 notes are sorted into pocket 102b, and fit $10 notes are sorted into pocket 102c. As to the $20 notes, the machine in this example has been configured, such as by either a user setting or by a manufacturer setting, to sort the $20 notes into one of a plurality of additional grades of fitness. According to this example, a first quality of $20 notes (e.g., Mint) can be sorted into pocket 102d, a second quality of $20 notes (e.g., Grade A) can be sorted into pocket 102e, a third quality of $20 notes (e.g., Grade B) can be sorted into pocket 102f, and a fourth quality of $20 notes (e.g., Grade C) can be sorted into pocket 102g. The unfit $1 notes are output to pocket 102h and the unfit $5, $10, and $20 notes are output to pockets 102i, 102j, and 102k (not shown in FIGS. 3-4).


As discussed above with respect to the example of FIG. 2, the user may select from one of numerous sorting and/or packaging options. FIGS. 5(b)-5(i) illustrate examples of types of selection screens that may be presented to a user of the machine. In FIG. 5(b), a screen prompts the user (e.g., end user, technician) to select the denominations of bills to be sorted for fitness. For each of these denominations, FIG. 5(c) prompts the user to enter the levels of fitness into which the denomination is to be sorted. As illustrated, each denomination may be sorted into Mint, Grade A, Grade B, Grade C, Unfit, or Fit. Additional categories may also be entered by a user. In FIG. 5(d), the user is requested to input, for each denomination and level of fitness, a desired combination of fitness types (e.g., soil, tears, holes, limpness, note length, note width, missing corner, folded corner, thickness, ink wear, etc.) that are to apply thereto. Thus, a given denomination (e.g., $20) and level of fitness (e.g., Grade A) may selectively be sorted to a first set of fitness types (e.g., soil, tears, holes, limpness), whereas another level of fitness (e.g., Mint) for the same denomination selectively be sorted to a different set of fitness types (e.g., soil, tears, holes, limpness, note length, note width, missing corner, folded corner, thickness, ink wear).


Likewise, one denomination (e.g., $20) may be tested relative to a different set of fitness types than another denomination (e.g., $10) even within a similar assigned grade (e.g., Grade A). For example, a $20 Grade A note may be required to meet the minimum acceptance criteria for eight selected fitness types, whereas a $10 Grade A note may only be required to meet the minimum acceptance criteria for six selected fitness types.



FIG. 5(
d) shows that, for each of the selected fitness types and levels of fitness, the user may enter the fitness criteria for each of the fitness types. As shown, numbered options 1-5 relate to various levels of fitness for Soil. Successive options would permit similar user-definition of these fitness criteria, or other fitness criteria, for each of the fitness types selectable by the user. FIG. 5(e) presents an optional summary screen. In one alternative to the information displayed in FIG. 5(e), a small pop-up window, banner, or the like could be persistently, yet unobtrusively, displayed on each of the user data entry screens to display a tally, possibly abbreviated or coded, of the selected options. FIG. 5(g) shows an example of a screen wherein a user is being prompted to enter the fitness criteria to be applied to a $20, Grade A note previously entered in a user-defined sort (e.g., see FIGS. 5(b)-(e)). In FIG. 5(g), options 1-4 display pre-defined fitness criteria for a Grade A note, which may optionally be denomination specific. The user may opt to enter different values by selecting options 5-8 and entering user-defined values. Additional options (not shown) may be presented to the user enabling the user to, for example, return to a prior screen to edit, add, or remove fitness types, or to select from other options and combinations of settings.



FIG. 5(
h) shows that, for each of the sorted denominations, the user may define the criteria that is to be used to assign an overall fitness grade. In other words, a user may dictate how a note is to be adjudged to be fit or unfit if, for example, five fitness types of a $10 note were determined to satisfy Grade A acceptance criteria and one fitness type was determined to satisfy only a Grade B acceptance criteria. In a least common denominator setting, for example, the $10 note in the example would be assigned the lowest rating, Grade B, of all of the measured categories. Likewise, if a particular denomination were only to be sorted into fit or unfit, as compared to 8 fitness types, a least common denominator setting would reject the note as unfit if any of the fitness criteria were determined to fall below the “fit” acceptance criteria. In a weighted average analysis, however, the $10 note in the example would be classified as a Grade A note. Users may alternatively be permitted to define other criteria by which the overall ratings are assigned.



FIG. 5(
i) shows that, the user is provided an option to specifically designate the output pocket or receptacle into which each denomination, fitness level, and fitness type is to be discharged. In this example, the user is being prompted to designated an output pocket for a $20 Grade A note. In one aspect, the prompt may also indicate, in this example screen or in another screen, different packaging options available to the user. For example, output pockets 102a-102h may be provided with one type of note packaging, whereas output pockets 102i-k may be provided with one type of note packaging.


The above exemplary screens are not intended to limit the present concepts in any way and are intended, instead, to merely present at least some aspects of at least some embodiments of the present concepts and to generally illustrate user-definability of sorting and/or fitness determination in accord with aspects of the present concepts.


In accord with the above, the sorting and fitness evaluation and acceptance criteria are definable by the user to particularly meet the user's needs. For example, a Mint and/or Grade A designation could be associated with new or ATM quality bank bills, the specific criterion selectable by the user, with the Grade B bills comprising a lesser quality of fit bills. Further, a user may opt to subdivide unfit notes of one or more denominations into a plurality of pockets or receptacles corresponding to a designated defect type. For example, unfit $20 bills may be output to a plurality of pockets in accord with pre-defined user criteria, as opposed to discharging every unfit $20 bill into a single pocket. Pocket 102c may be designated to receive unfit $20 bills having a fitness type or defect (e.g., Soil) of a first level defined by a user (e.g., Level 1) and pocket 102d may be designated to receive unfit $20 bills having the same fitness type or defect of a different degree (e.g., Level 2). The terms Level 1 and Level 2 are merely arbitrary designators intended to illustrate that unfit bills of a given denomination, or even multiple denominations, may be selectively sorted and discharged in accord with a selected fitness type and/or level.


From the variously configured pockets 102a-102k, the sorted bills may then be packaged in-place (e.g., cassettes) or moved to a packaging station for strapping. One example of a suitable strapping apparatus is disclosed in U.S. Pat. Appl. Pub. No. 2004-003980 to Hallowell et al., published on Jan. 8, 2004, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.


Further to the above-noted user-friendly concepts, providing bill packaging in accord with the present concepts may also be user-definable. Once the bills could be sorted by fitness levels and defect codes, it should be noted that they could be put into either pockets, cassettes, strapped, or strapped and placed in cassettes. Unfit bills, in particular, could be strapped by denomination in quantities of 100, 200, 250, 300, 500, 1,000, 1,500 and 2,000 bills, or could be strapped with mixed denominations in similar quantities. The straps would advantageously be color-coded with the standard ABA color code appropriate to the denomination and be plainly marked with the financial institutions name and ABA routing number and the identification number of the depositing office, as well as the dollar amount of the currency contained by the strap, the identity of the persons who verified the strap, and the date of verification. Other means of conveying such information may alternatively be implemented in accord with the present concepts to indelibly assign information to the finished strap, brick, or bundle such as, for example, a customized shrink-wrap or security label.


Whereas conventional bills are sorted by denomination and passed to the Federal Reserve for processing, sending 10 units of 100 strap-banded bills wrapped together in a bundle, the present currency processing machine 10 is adapted to sort out fit from unfit bills and separately bundle or package such unfit bills into separate packages for shipping to one of the twelve Federal Reserve Banks (“the Fed”) or to other financial institutions or receivers. In accord with the present concepts, the unfit bills, or graded fit bills, may be packaged in non-standard sizes for inter-branch or intra-branch shipment to other financial institutions or receivers, such as other local banks, for fees and/or faster response times which might be lower and/or faster, respectively, than a similar request placed with the Federal Reserve. Thus, a separate market can be created in currency packaging and shipment wherein a bank needing ATM quality notes may request them from another bank in exchange for fit currency of a lesser grade for a fee that would be lower than that charged by the Federal Reserve (if the bank had exceeded its allotment of deposits or orders for the week) and may receive same-day service.


Bills deemed unfit may advantageously be permanently marked by the system 10 such as by the MPS 100 prior to the packaging function in a manner that would render the bills clearly unfit so as to prevent later misuse or misappropriation of the unfit bills. Such permanent marking could include, but is not limited to, printing across one or both sides of the bill (e.g., “VOID”) using one or more permanent and/or safety inks or chemicals, perforation of the bill at rates of about 1000 bills per minute, and/or discoloration of selected portions of the bill. Encryption and non-visible security features may further be added to bills deemed unfit during processing to discourage subsequent theft of the packaged unfit bills.


If the manner in which the unfit bills are rendered unsuitable is sufficiently rigorous, then the demands required of the packaging can be correspondingly reduced, if not eliminated. For example, unfit bills having “VOID” written in indelible ink across the face of the bill and “VOID” written out therein in perforations, could likely be packaged into cardboard boxes for sealing and shipping to the Federal Reserve for replacement with fit currency. In other words, the security precautions against theft and tampering could be reduced, with a corresponding benefit through the lessening of armored car service costs.


Alternatively, unfit bills could be put into tamper-proof cassettes that could be sent back to the Federal Reserve or could be put into bags and shrink-wrapped and sent back to the Federal Reserve. Unfit bills could alternatively be put into plastic currency bags and shipped to the Federal Reserve. The conventional plastic currency bags are required by the to be clear, plastic bags designed for one-time use, which have tamper-evident bag seals, interior measurements not exceeding 19″×28″, thickness of at least 5-mil for 19″×28″ bags and lesser thicknesses for smaller bags provided the bag remains durable and tear resistant. Clear plastic containers, metal containers, and heavy cloth bags may also be used to ship currency to the Federal Reserve using registered mail.


It is to be noted that the present currency processing system permits multiple modes of packaging unfit bills for shipment, such as to an authorized bank, disposal site and/or repository site, the particular mode of packaging being user-definable and customizable by the user to meet their unique requirements and needs. In other words, the user may discharge selected denominations and/or fitness types and/or fitness levels to selected output pockets or receptacles or to selected conveyance devices, wherein such pockets, receptacles, and conveyance devices are, in turn, associated with specified packaging systems. In one example, for example, the user could specify one type of packaging for lower value bills ($1) and another type of packaging for higher value bills ($100). In a preferred aspect, the packaging function may be modular and may permit a user to select from one or more available packaging options.


According to some embodiments, the processes and apparatuses for packaging of bills deemed unfit for continued circulation could comprise packaging devices such as the strapping devices disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,025,420 to Horino, 4,117,650 to Ito et al., 4,845,917 to Omura et al., 6,460,705 to Hallowell, 6,574,941 to Neri, and 6,598,726 to Lundblad et al., each of which is incorporated herein in its entirety. These systems and devices could be integrated with or connected to the disclosed currency processing system 10 or other currency processing system configured in accord with the present concepts.


According to some embodiments, the pockets 60 into which the unfit bills are deposited could comprise a plastic film open container dimensioned to be slightly larger than that of the desired quantity of bills (e.g., for 500 bills of U.S. currency, slightly greater than 2.61″×6.14″×2.15″), particularly in the height-wise direction. Alternatively, the stacked unfit bills could be removed from the corresponding one of the pockets 60 and placed in such plastic film open container. Following placement of the unfit bills, the plastic film is heated to shrink wrap the unfit bills in a tight bundle. Multiple sequences of shrink wrapping may be employed to encase the bills in multiple layers of plastic film, each of which may optionally be selected to possess different properties or characteristics. According to some embodiments, the plastic film may be colored along approximately a center-line thereof with a standard ABA color code appropriate to the denomination to be packaged (e.g., a plastic film for $20 bills could comprise a violet line which would visually mimic a violet strap).


The currency processing system 10 in accord with the present concepts may further comprise a currency tracking system 50, represented in FIG. 1. In combination with various fitness and counterfeit criteria, the bills being processed in the first, second, and third stations 25, 30, 40, or sub-combination thereof, could be tracked by storing an association between the serial number of each bill, or representation thereof, on a local memory 18 or on a remote memory, accessible through I/O port 17. A representation of the serial number could include, for example, an encryption of the serial number, an image of the serial number, an encryption of an image of the serial number, or an encrypted/non-encrypted composite of the serial number and other identifying information, such as the series or Federal Reserve Bank letter and number. In accord with some embodiments of the currency tracking system, at least one measure of the fitness and/or other identifying information, such as the bill denomination would be associated with the serial number or other representation thereof incorporating the serial number, in whole or in part.


The stored information on each bill can be tracked locally (i.e., within a bank) or remotely (e.g., outside of the bank) to permit tracking of fitness characteristics, counterfeit characteristics, and/or the particular readings for unfit bills for a given sensor or detection device (e.g., average readings, maximum readings, minimum readings). This information can be used locally or remotely, through a network or through a communication device or system, to permit overall performance tracking of both the processing, in general, and individual bills, by the bank, the Federal Reserve, Secret Service, or other oversight entity. For example, the stored information could include statistics regarding the number of bills run and the number of bills off-sorted as being unfit, as well as the conditions under which it was determined that the bill was unfit. The stored information can also be made available to outside entities (i.e., the Federal Reserve) to permit tracking and/or updating of information on particular bills to track the circulation and/or condition of any particular bill through its life. Serial number tracking would be particularly beneficial in identifying the introduction of counterfeit bills bearing a common serial number or a characteristic defect indicative of common origin.


The fitness detection sensor(s) and methods disclosed can also be used to assess the fitness of documents other than currency bills. Accordingly, when describing various embodiments of the present invention, the term “bills” or “currency bills” refers to official currency bills including both U.S. currency bills, such as a $1, $2, $5, $10, $20, $50, or $100 bill, and foreign currency bills. Foreign currency bills are bank bills issued by a non-U.S. governmental agency as legal tender, such as the Euro, Yen, or Pound. Although the invention embodiments refer to the “denomination” of currency bills as a criterion used in evaluating the currency bills, other predetermined criteria can be used to evaluate the currency bills, such as, for example, color, size, and orientation. Other forms of bills or documents could also be processed in accord with aspects of the present invention including non-currency documents and substitute currency notes.


Thus, a method for tracking currency in accord with the present concepts could include the acts of processing a plurality of bills to determine fitness and, optionally, for tracking such bills. The method involves, generally, processing a plurality of bills and retrieving from each of the processed bills characteristic information, inclusive of fitness information, unique to each bill. The characteristic information includes at least one characteristic relating to a bill fitness (e.g., ink wear, soil, substrate defect, etc.) and another identifying characteristic relating to a bill (e.g., serial number, bar code, RFID signature, etc.). This characteristic information may then be used not only to track currency, but to track the fitness of the currency over time. Once the currency processing system 10 processes a bill, the characteristic information may be stored in a data storage medium (e.g., a local or remote database or on a storage device or server). From this storage medium, attached currency processing systems 10 or other computers or terminals may be provided access to the stored information on currency and fitness. If the bill has been previously processed and its information stored in the database, the previous information may be retrieved, compared, and the record optionally updated or appended to reflect any new characteristic information, such as a changed fitness. If the bill has not been previously processed, the characteristic information may be stored as a new record in the database. Preferably, the characteristic information relating to fitness is logically associated with the characteristic information relating to the currency identification (e.g., serial number). In this manner, changes to the fitness of a particular bill over time may be ascertained.


In still additional embodiments, a neural network note recognition system could be integrated with the above concepts, neural network note recognition system comprising a plurality of different detector types logically integrated into a neural network to adaptively determine authenticity and/or fitness.


Subsequent to the aforementioned fitness determinations and processing of the notes, also provided may be a separate process and apparatus for verifiably destroying unfit notes. Once notes have been deemed unfit for continued circulation, the notes may be indirectly destroyed by packaging the unfit notes, such as noted above, for shipment to a facility designated for destruction of the unfit notes. Alternatively, in accord with at least some of the present concepts, the unfit notes may be destroyed directly. Devices for direct or in-situ destruction of the unfit notes could include, for example, mechanical devices assuring complete destruction (e.g., shredding and/or disintegrating unfit notes using a mechanical shredder, press, etc.) or mechanical devices for causing a less than complete obliteration of the unfit notes (e.g., using a marking, perforation, or printing device which would leave the note substantially intact, but clearly not redeemable or capable of recirculation). In other aspects, devices for direct or in-situ destruction of the unfit notes could include state-changing devices for producing an irreversible change of state to the unfit notes by chemical and/or incendiary processes (e.g., laser incineration). The means for destruction could be integrated with the verification device, or separate from the verification device. These means for destruction, or the like, are combined with means for indisputably verifying that the unfit notes designated for destruction were, in fact, destroyed. The verification device could include, for example, imaging the note or a definitive portion thereof (e.g., a bottom quarter of the note including the serial number and denomination) as it irretrievably enters the destruction device. The verification device could also include a multi-image capture device comprising imaging the unfit notes at two or more different stages or states of processing and/or destruction. Alternatively, video cameras or CCDs could be employed. In another aspect, coupons could be removed from each unfit note (e.g., a portion of the note including unique indicia for identifying the destroyed note, such as one serial number) for retention and verification purposes, while the remainder of the unfit note is destroyed, with or without imaging. The images may advantageously be encrypted prior to electronic transmission and/or storage.


Similarly, a local independently verifiable document destruction method and device would permit accelerated credit of money to local banks and lending institutions for unfit currency. In one aspect, a method for accelerated credit of money to banks for unfit currency would, in accord with the concepts outlined above, comprise a device for processing and sorting notes determined to be unfit as outlined above or and/or a device for verifying that received carrier (e.g., bundles, packages, bags, cassettes, or the like) of notes designated as being unfit by another source are, in fact, both unfit and possess the value indicated by the marking or documentation accompanying the carrier. If the notes designated by another source as being unfit are processed in a predetermined or unified manner, the verification equipment can be reduced to eliminate the separate fitness determination and to focus exclusively on processing and scanning the notes to verify that the inspected notes correspond to those notes detailed in an associated electronic file (e.g., an encrypted data file). For example, in accord with the above, unfit notes could be imprinted with a colored dye across all but the serial number and the corners or other distinctive characteristic sufficient to identify the note and denomination. The verification device could then comprise a CCD or other imaging device to image each note and convert the imaged data to a usable form that could be compared, note for note, to an associated electronic file. If the imaged note matches (e.g., same serial number, same denomination, and evidence of imprinted ink in one or more other inspection points), then a counter could be appropriately incremented or decremented.


In various aspects, a local independently verifiable document destruction device would comprise a local device for destroying unfit notes, a sensing device for storing information characteristic of each individual unfit note destroyed, a storage device wherein the information characteristic of each individual unfit note destroyed is retained for validation and/or review, and a verifiable access portal to the information to facilitate independent certification of the destruction of the unfit notes. An local independently verifiable document destruction method and device in accord with the above concepts permits, upon independent verification of the destruction of the unfit notes, crediting of an amount of destroyed unfit notes by electronic or physical funds transfer through a data input/output (I/O) device, communications port, communication path, printer (e.g., security paper), and/or writing device (e.g., CD-RW, magnetic storage device, etc.).


In accord with any of the aspects, concepts, and embodiments disclosed herein, a sensing device may optionally be provided to read or capture a bar code or other code imprinted or on embedded within the currency bill.


In accord with any of the aspects, concepts, and embodiments disclosed herein, any currency bill deemed unfit is optionally marked as being unfit or rendered clearly unusable following a determination that the currency bill is unfit. Thus, the currency processing system 10 may comprise an unfit bill processing device including, for example, (1) a mechanical device assuring complete destruction (e.g., shredding and/or disintegrating unfit notes using a mechanical shredder, press); (2) a mechanical device configured to cause a less than complete obliteration of the unfit notes (e.g., using a marking or printing device, such as a laser, stamp, or ink jet, or a perforation device which would leave the note substantially intact, but clearly not redeemable or capable of recirculation); and/or (3) state-changing devices for producing an irreversible change of state to the unfit notes by chemical and/or incendiary processes (e.g., laser incineration).


The above-noted unfit bill processing device may advantageously, but optionally, be integrated with or used in combination with a verification device for indisputably verifying that the unfit notes were clearly rendered unusable. Such verification device may include, for example, (1) an imaging device to image the currency bill as it enters the unfit bill processing device; (2) an imaging device to image the serial number and/or denomination of the note as it enters the unfit bill processing device; (3) an imaging device configured to obtain a multi-image capture comprising images of the unfit currency bill at two or more different stages or states of processing in the unfit bill processing device; and/or (4) removing from each unfit currency bill the serial numbers (coupons), or other unique indicia of identification, for retention and verification purposes, with a corresponding destruction of the remainder of the unfit currency bills (with or without imaging). The images may advantageously be encrypted.


As the term is used herein, the term currency bills shall comprise conventional U.S. currency bills or foreign currency bills. The present concepts are applicable generally to any negotiable instruments (e.g., checks) and such applications are within the scope of the present concepts.


Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the phrase “at least one of ‘A’ and ‘B’,” where “A” and “B” may represent anything (e.g., an act, a structure, a component, etc.), shall mean any combination of “A” and/or “B” (i.e., only “A,” only “B,” or “A and B”). Likewise, the phrase “at least one of ‘A,’ ‘B,’ and ‘C’” shall mean any combination of “A” and/or “B” and/or “C” (e.g., only “A,” only “B,” only “C,” “A and C,” “B and C,” “A and B and C,” etc.).


While the present concepts are susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the present concepts are not intended to limit the invention as to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. For example, in combination with any of the above noted concepts, inclusion of biometric devices, (e.g., retinal scan, voice imprinting, facial or facial feature recognition, fingerprint, etc.) may provide enhanced control, access, authorization, and verification of any action or transaction. As an additional example, methods described herein may comprise a lesser or greater number of acts and/or acts executed in various orders other than those particularly disclosed.

Claims
  • 1. A user-configurable currency processing device, comprising: an input receptacle adapted to receive input currency bills;a first fitness detector adapted to retrieve at least a first characteristic information relating to a first predefined fitness type from each of the currency bills;a second fitness detector adapted to retrieve at least a second characteristic information relating to a second predefined fitness type from each of the currency bills;a transport mechanism adapted to serially transport each of the currency bills from the input receptacle to the first fitness detector and the second fitness detector and then to one of a plurality of output receptacles;a physical memory device bearing assignments of designated values of said first characteristic information to predetermined ones of a plurality of first predefined fitness levels and assignments of designated values of said second characteristic information to predetermined ones of a plurality of second predefined fitness levels;a controller configured to process the first characteristic information retrieved for each of the currency bills processed by the first fitness detector and assign to each currency bill a first fitness level associated with the first characteristic information of the first fitness type and corresponding to a designated value of the processed first characteristic information, andwherein the plurality of defined fitness levels for the first characteristic information of the first predefined fitness type comprises at least one unfit level and a plurality of fit levels,wherein the plurality of fitness levels for the first characteristic information comprises an ATM fit level and at least two other distinct fit levels for the first characteristic information.
  • 2. The user-configurable currency processing device, according to claim 1, wherein said controller is configured to determine a net fitness level from the first fitness level.
  • 3. The user-configurable currency processing device, according to claim 2, wherein said controller is further configured to discharge each currency bill from the transport mechanism to an output receptacle designated by a user to receive said net fitness level of currency bills.
  • 4. The user-configurable currency processing device, according to claim 3, further comprising a denomination detector for retrieving third characteristic information associated with a denomination of a currency bill.
  • 5. The user-configurable currency processing device, according to claim 1, further comprising an unfit bill processing device configured to render unusable currency bills determined to be unfit by permanently marking or permanently altering each of the unfit currency bills to provide a visual indication of such unfit status.
  • 6. A user-configurable currency processing device, comprising: an input receptacle adapted to receive input currency bills;a first fitness detector adapted to retrieve at least a first characteristic information relating to a first predefined fitness type from each of the currency bills;a second fitness detector adapted to retrieve at least a second characteristic information relating to a second predefined fitness type from each of the currency bills;a transport mechanism adapted to serially transport each of the currency bills from the input receptacle to the first fitness detector and the second fitness detector and then to one of a plurality of output receptacles;a physical memory device bearing assignments of designated values of said first characteristic information to predetermined ones of a plurality of first predefined fitness levels and assignments of designated values of said second characteristic information to predetermined ones of a plurality of second predefined fitness levels;a controller configured to process the first characteristic information retrieved for each of the currency bills processed by the first fitness detector and assign to each currency bill a first fitness level associated with the first characteristic information of the first fitness type and corresponding to a designated value of the processed first characteristic information;a denomination detector for retrieving third characteristic information associated with a denomination of a currency bill, andwherein the plurality of defined fitness levels for the first characteristic information of the first predefined fitness type comprises at least one unfit level and a plurality of fit levels,wherein said controller is configured to determine a net fitness level from the first fitness level,wherein said controller is further configured to discharge each currency bill from the transport mechanism to an output receptacle designated by a user to receive said net fitness level of currency bills,wherein said physical memory device bears user-defined assignments of designated levels of said first characteristic information for each of the plurality of defined fitness levels.
  • 7. The user-configurable currency processing device, according to claim 6, further comprising an authenticity detector for retrieving fourth characteristic information associated with an authenticity of the currency bill.
  • 8. The user-configurable currency processing device, according to claim 6, wherein said first fitness detector comprises at least one of a limpness detector, a thickness detector, a soil detector, a tape detector, a hole detector, a tear detector, a staple detector, a graffiti detector, stain detector, or an ink wear detector.
  • 9. The user-configurable currency processing device, according to claim 6, further comprising at least one sensor configured to read or capture a bar code from a currency bill.
  • 10. A method for tracking currency comprising the acts of: processing a plurality of bills, using a currency processing machine, to determine fitness;using a sensor, reading from each of the plurality of processed bills characteristic information comprising at least a first characteristic information relating to a bill fitness and a second characteristic relating to a bill serial number;using a processor, assigning the first characteristic information to one of a plurality of fitness levels defined by a user, the plurality of fitness levels comprising a plurality of fit levels for the first characteristic information and at least one unfit level for the first characteristic information;storing the first characteristic information, the second characteristic information and the assigned fitness level to a physical memory,wherein the plurality of fitness levels for the first characteristic information comprises an ATM fit level and at least two other distinct, user-defined fit levels for the first characteristic information.
  • 11. The method for tracking currency according to claim 10, wherein the first characteristic information comprises information relating to at least one of ink wear, soilage, and series.
  • 12. The method for tracking currency according to claim 10, wherein the first characteristic information comprises information relating to a bill substrate defect comprising at least one of a dimensional defect, hole, tear, corner, or tape.
  • 13. The method for tracking currency according to claim 10, further comprising the act of: storing in a remote physical memory data relating to at least one of a processing bank, processing time, processing machine, and user in the database of processed bills in association with the second characteristic information.
  • 14. A currency processing device, comprising: an input receptacle adapted to receive input currency bills;a fitness reading device adapted to retrieve at least a first characteristic information relating to fitness from each of the currency bills;a transport mechanism adapted to transport the currency bills from the input receptacle to the fitness reading device and then to one of a plurality of output receptacles;a memory device for storing one of or both of user-definitions and user settings for at least the first characteristic information;an I/O device configured at least to receive a user input;a processor adapted to process the first characteristic information retrieved for each of the currency bills by the reading device and assign to each currency bill to a fitness level selected from a plurality of pre-defined fitness levels, the selected fitness level corresponding to the processed first characteristic information; anda controller adapted to discharge each currency bill having a first fitness level, corresponding to a first fit condition in a first fitness type, to a first output receptacle,discharge each currency bill having a second fitness level, corresponding to a second fit condition in the first fitness type, to a second output receptacle, anddischarge each currency bill having a third fitness level, corresponding to an unfit condition in the first fitness type, to a third output receptacle, anddischarge each currency bill having a fourth fitness level, corresponding to a third fit condition in the first fitness type, to a fourth output receptacle,wherein the plurality of pre-defined fitness levels comprises a plurality of fit levels for a particular fitness type and an unfit level for the particular fitness type.
  • 15. The currency processing device according to claim 14, wherein said fitness reading device comprises any least one of a limpness detector, a thickness detector, a soil detector, a tape detector, a hole detector, a tear detector, a staple detector, a graffiti detector, stain detector, and an ink wear detector.
  • 16. The currency processing device according to claim 14, wherein said controller is adapted to discharge each currency bill having a fifth fitness level, corresponding to a fourth fit condition in the first fitness type, to a fifth output receptacle.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/723,652, entitled “Currency Processing System With Fitness Detection,” which was filed on Oct. 5, 2005, and is a continuation application of U.S. Non-Provisional Patent Application No. 11/544,228, entitled “Currency Processing System With Fitness Detection” which was filed on Oct. 5, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,978,899 each of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (745)
Number Name Date Kind
2570920 Clough et al. Oct 1951 A
2669998 Buchholz Feb 1954 A
2750949 Kulo et al. Jun 1956 A
2835260 Buchholz May 1958 A
2865561 Rosapepe Dec 1958 A
3132654 Adams May 1964 A
3376970 Roseberg Apr 1968 A
3771583 Bottemiller Nov 1973 A
3778595 Hatanaka et al. Dec 1973 A
3916922 Prumm Nov 1975 A
3976198 Carnes, Jr. et al. Aug 1976 A
3998237 Kressin Dec 1976 A
3998379 Myers et al. Dec 1976 A
4050218 Call Sep 1977 A
4059122 Kinoshita Nov 1977 A
4075460 Gorgens Feb 1978 A
4124111 Hayashi Nov 1978 A
4150740 Douno Apr 1979 A
4166945 Inoyama et al. Sep 1979 A
4172462 Uchida et al. Oct 1979 A
4179685 O'Maley Dec 1979 A
4179723 Spencer Dec 1979 A
4184366 Butler Jan 1980 A
4197986 Nagata Apr 1980 A
4208549 Polillo et al. Jun 1980 A
4228812 Marti Oct 1980 A
4232295 McConnell Nov 1980 A
4234003 Ristvedt et al. Nov 1980 A
4249552 Margolin et al. Feb 1981 A
4251867 Uchida et al. Feb 1981 A
4286703 Schuller et al. Sep 1981 A
RE30773 Glaser et al. Oct 1981 E
4310885 Azcua et al. Jan 1982 A
4317957 Sendrow Mar 1982 A
4341951 Benton Jul 1982 A
4355369 Garvin Oct 1982 A
4360034 Davila et al. Nov 1982 A
4369442 Werth et al. Jan 1983 A
4380316 Glinka et al. Apr 1983 A
4383540 DeMeyer et al. May 1983 A
4385285 Horst et al. May 1983 A
4412292 Sedam et al. Oct 1983 A
4416299 Bergman Nov 1983 A
4417136 Rushby et al. Nov 1983 A
4423316 Sano et al. Dec 1983 A
4434359 Watanabe Feb 1984 A
4436103 Dick Mar 1984 A
4454414 Benton Jun 1984 A
4474197 Kinoshita et al. Oct 1984 A
4488116 Plesko Dec 1984 A
4531531 Johnson et al. Jul 1985 A
4543969 Rasmussen Oct 1985 A
4549561 Johnson et al. Oct 1985 A
4556140 Okada Dec 1985 A
4558711 Yoshiaki et al. Dec 1985 A
4564036 Ristvedt Jan 1986 A
4570655 Raterman Feb 1986 A
4594664 Hashimoto Jun 1986 A
4602332 Hirose et al. Jul 1986 A
4607649 Taipale et al. Aug 1986 A
4620559 Childers et al. Nov 1986 A
4641239 Takesako Feb 1987 A
4674260 Rasmussen et al. Jun 1987 A
4681128 Ristvedt et al. Jul 1987 A
4705154 Masho et al. Nov 1987 A
4718218 Ristvedt Jan 1988 A
4731043 Ristvedt et al. Mar 1988 A
4733765 Watanabe Mar 1988 A
4749074 Ueki et al. Jun 1988 A
4753624 Adams et al. Jun 1988 A
4753625 Okada Jun 1988 A
4765464 Ristvedt Aug 1988 A
4766548 Cedrone et al. Aug 1988 A
4775353 Childers et al. Oct 1988 A
4775354 Rasmussen et al. Oct 1988 A
4778983 Ushikubo Oct 1988 A
4787518 Yuge et al. Nov 1988 A
4803347 Sugahara et al. Feb 1989 A
4804830 Miyagisima et al. Feb 1989 A
4812629 O'Neil et al. Mar 1989 A
4839505 Bradt et al. Jun 1989 A
4844369 Kanayachi Jul 1989 A
4848556 Shah et al. Jul 1989 A
4863414 Ristvedt et al. Sep 1989 A
4883158 Kobayashi et al. Nov 1989 A
4884212 Stutsman Nov 1989 A
4900909 Nagashima et al. Feb 1990 A
4908516 West Mar 1990 A
4921463 Primdahl et al. May 1990 A
4936435 Griner Jun 1990 A
4953086 Fukatsu Aug 1990 A
4954697 Kokubun et al. Sep 1990 A
4964495 Rasmussen Oct 1990 A
4966570 Ristvedt et al. Oct 1990 A
4970655 Winn et al. Nov 1990 A
4971187 Furuya et al. Nov 1990 A
4988849 Sasaki et al. Jan 1991 A
4992647 Konishi et al. Feb 1991 A
4995848 Goh Feb 1991 A
5009627 Rasmussen Apr 1991 A
5010238 Kadono et al. Apr 1991 A
5010485 Bigari Apr 1991 A
5011455 Rasmussen Apr 1991 A
5022889 Ristvedt et al. Jun 1991 A
5025139 Halliburton, Jr. Jun 1991 A
5026320 Rasmussen Jun 1991 A
5031098 Miller et al. Jul 1991 A
5033602 Saarinen et al. Jul 1991 A
5039848 Stoken Aug 1991 A
5055086 Raterman et al. Oct 1991 A
5055657 Miller et al. Oct 1991 A
5064999 Okamoto et al. Nov 1991 A
5080633 Ristvedt et al. Jan 1992 A
5091713 Horne et al. Feb 1992 A
5104353 Ristvedt et al. Apr 1992 A
5105601 Horiguchi et al. Apr 1992 A
5106338 Rasmussen et al. Apr 1992 A
5111927 Schulze May 1992 A
5114381 Ueda et al. May 1992 A
5120945 Nishibe et al. Jun 1992 A
5123873 Rasmussen Jun 1992 A
5129205 Rasmussen Jul 1992 A
5135435 Rasmussen Aug 1992 A
5140517 Nagata et al. Aug 1992 A
5141443 Rasmussen et al. Aug 1992 A
5141472 Todd et al. Aug 1992 A
5145455 Todd Sep 1992 A
5146067 Sloan et al. Sep 1992 A
5154272 Nishiumi et al. Oct 1992 A
5163672 Mennie Nov 1992 A
5163866 Rasmussen Nov 1992 A
5163867 Rasmussen Nov 1992 A
5163868 Adams et al. Nov 1992 A
5167313 Dobbins et al. Dec 1992 A
5175416 Mansvelt et al. Dec 1992 A
5176565 Ristvedt et al. Jan 1993 A
5179517 Sarbin et al. Jan 1993 A
5183142 Latchinian et al. Feb 1993 A
5184709 Nishiumi et al. Feb 1993 A
5194037 Jones et al. Mar 1993 A
5197919 Geib et al. Mar 1993 A
5205780 Rasmussen Apr 1993 A
5207784 Schwartzendruber May 1993 A
5207788 Geib May 1993 A
5209696 Rasmussen et al. May 1993 A
5236071 Lee Aug 1993 A
5243174 Veeneman et al. Sep 1993 A
5251738 Dabrowski Oct 1993 A
5252811 Henochowicz et al. Oct 1993 A
5253167 Yoshida et al. Oct 1993 A
5263566 Nara et al. Nov 1993 A
5265874 Dickinson et al. Nov 1993 A
5268561 Kimura et al. Dec 1993 A
5277651 Rasmussen et al. Jan 1994 A
5282127 Mii Jan 1994 A
5286226 Rasmussen Feb 1994 A
5286954 Sato et al. Feb 1994 A
5291003 Avnet et al. Mar 1994 A
5291560 Daugman Mar 1994 A
5293981 Abe et al. Mar 1994 A
5295196 Raterman et al. Mar 1994 A
5297030 Vassigh et al. Mar 1994 A
5297598 Rasmussen Mar 1994 A
5297986 Ristvedt et al. Mar 1994 A
5299977 Mazur et al. Apr 1994 A
5324922 Roberts Jun 1994 A
5326104 Pease et al. Jul 1994 A
5370575 Geib et al. Dec 1994 A
5372542 Geib et al. Dec 1994 A
5374814 Kako et al. Dec 1994 A
5379344 Larsson et al. Jan 1995 A
5379875 Shames et al. Jan 1995 A
5382191 Rasmussen Jan 1995 A
5390776 Thompson Feb 1995 A
5401211 Geib et al. Mar 1995 A
5404986 Hossfield et al. Apr 1995 A
5410590 Blood et al. Apr 1995 A
RE34934 Raterman et al. May 1995 E
5425669 Geib et al. Jun 1995 A
5429550 Mazur et al. Jul 1995 A
5440108 Tran et al. Aug 1995 A
5450938 Rademacher Sep 1995 A
5453047 Mazur et al. Sep 1995 A
5467405 Raterman et al. Nov 1995 A
5467406 Graves et al. Nov 1995 A
5468182 Geib Nov 1995 A
5470079 LeStrange et al. Nov 1995 A
5474495 Geib et al. Dec 1995 A
5474497 Jones et al. Dec 1995 A
5480348 Mazur et al. Jan 1996 A
5489237 Geib et al. Feb 1996 A
5500514 Veeneman et al. Mar 1996 A
5501631 Mennie et al. Mar 1996 A
5507379 Mazur et al. Apr 1996 A
D369984 Larsen May 1996 S
5514034 Jones et al. May 1996 A
5520577 Rasmussen May 1996 A
5538468 Ristvedt et al. Jul 1996 A
5542880 Geib et al. Aug 1996 A
5542881 Geib Aug 1996 A
5553320 Matsuura et al. Sep 1996 A
5559887 Davis et al. Sep 1996 A
5564546 Molbak et al. Oct 1996 A
5564974 Mazur et al. Oct 1996 A
5564978 Jones et al. Oct 1996 A
5570465 Tsakanikas Oct 1996 A
5573457 Watts et al. Nov 1996 A
5584758 Geib Dec 1996 A
5592377 Lipkin Jan 1997 A
5602933 Blackwell et al. Feb 1997 A
5615280 Izawa et al. Mar 1997 A
5620079 Molbak Apr 1997 A
5623547 Jones et al. Apr 1997 A
5625562 Veeneman et al. Apr 1997 A
5630494 Strauts May 1997 A
5633949 Graves et al. May 1997 A
5640463 Csulits Jun 1997 A
5641050 Smith et al. Jun 1997 A
5650605 Morioka et al. Jul 1997 A
5650761 Gomm et al. Jul 1997 A
5652421 Veeneman et al. Jul 1997 A
5652802 Graves et al. Jul 1997 A
5665952 Ziarno Sep 1997 A
5679070 Ishida et al. Oct 1997 A
5684597 Hossfield et al. Nov 1997 A
5687963 Mennie Nov 1997 A
5692067 Raterman et al. Nov 1997 A
5696366 Ziarno Dec 1997 A
5704491 Graves Jan 1998 A
5724438 Graves Mar 1998 A
5743373 Strauts Apr 1998 A
5746299 Molbak et al. May 1998 A
5751840 Raterman et al. May 1998 A
5774874 Veeneman et al. Jun 1998 A
5782686 Geib et al. Jul 1998 A
5790693 Graves et al. Aug 1998 A
5790697 Munro et al. Aug 1998 A
5799767 Molbak Sep 1998 A
5806650 Mennie et al. Sep 1998 A
5813510 Rademacher Sep 1998 A
5815592 Mennie et al. Sep 1998 A
5822448 Graves et al. Oct 1998 A
5823315 Hoffman et al. Oct 1998 A
5830054 Petri Nov 1998 A
5832104 Graves et al. Nov 1998 A
5838812 Pare, Jr. et al. Nov 1998 A
5842188 Ramsey et al. Nov 1998 A
5842916 Gerrity et al. Dec 1998 A
5850076 Morioka et al. Dec 1998 A
5854581 Mori et al. Dec 1998 A
5865673 Geib et al. Feb 1999 A
5867589 Graves et al. Feb 1999 A
5870487 Graves et al. Feb 1999 A
5875259 Mennie et al. Feb 1999 A
5880444 Shibata et al. Mar 1999 A
5892211 Davis et al. Apr 1999 A
5892827 Beach et al. Apr 1999 A
5905810 Jones et al. May 1999 A
5909502 Mazur Jun 1999 A
5909503 Graves et al. Jun 1999 A
5909793 Beach et al. Jun 1999 A
5909794 Molbak et al. Jun 1999 A
5912982 Munro et al. Jun 1999 A
5913399 Takemoto et al. Jun 1999 A
5918748 Clark et al. Jul 1999 A
5938044 Weggesser Aug 1999 A
5940623 Watts et al. Aug 1999 A
5943655 Jacobson Aug 1999 A
5944600 Zimmermann Aug 1999 A
5951476 Beach et al. Sep 1999 A
5957262 Molbak et al. Sep 1999 A
5960103 Graves et al. Sep 1999 A
5966456 Jones et al. Oct 1999 A
5982918 Mennie et al. Nov 1999 A
5988348 Martin et al. Nov 1999 A
5992601 Mennie et al. Nov 1999 A
5995949 Morioka et al. Nov 1999 A
5997395 Geib et al. Dec 1999 A
6012565 Mazur Jan 2000 A
6017270 Ristvedt et al. Jan 2000 A
6021883 Casanova et al. Feb 2000 A
6026175 Munro et al. Feb 2000 A
6028951 Raterman et al. Feb 2000 A
6032859 Muehlberger et al. Mar 2000 A
6039644 Geib et al. Mar 2000 A
6039645 Mazur Mar 2000 A
6042470 Geib et al. Mar 2000 A
6047807 Molbak Apr 2000 A
6047808 Neubarth et al. Apr 2000 A
6056104 Neubarth et al. May 2000 A
6068194 Mazur May 2000 A
6072896 Graves et al. Jun 2000 A
6073744 Raterman et al. Jun 2000 A
6074334 Mennie et al. Jun 2000 A
6080056 Karlsson Jun 2000 A
6082519 Martin et al. Jul 2000 A
6086471 Zimmermann Jul 2000 A
6095313 Molbak et al. Aug 2000 A
6116402 Beach et al. Sep 2000 A
6128402 Jones et al. Oct 2000 A
6131625 Casanova et al. Oct 2000 A
6139418 Geib et al. Oct 2000 A
6142285 Panzeri et al. Nov 2000 A
6145738 Stinson et al. Nov 2000 A
6154879 Pare, Jr. et al. Nov 2000 A
6168001 Davis Jan 2001 B1
6171182 Geib et al. Jan 2001 B1
6174230 Gerrity et al. Jan 2001 B1
6196371 Martin et al. Mar 2001 B1
6196913 Geib et al. Mar 2001 B1
6220419 Mennie Apr 2001 B1
6230928 Hanna et al. May 2001 B1
6237739 Mazur et al. May 2001 B1
6241069 Mazur et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256407 Mennie et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264545 Magee et al. Jul 2001 B1
6278795 Anderson et al. Aug 2001 B1
6308887 Korman et al. Oct 2001 B1
6311819 Stromme et al. Nov 2001 B1
6318536 Korman et al. Nov 2001 B1
6318537 Jones et al. Nov 2001 B1
6349972 Geiger et al. Feb 2002 B1
6351551 Munro et al. Feb 2002 B1
6363164 Jones et al. Mar 2002 B1
6371303 Klein et al. Apr 2002 B1
6378683 Mennie Apr 2002 B2
6381354 Mennie et al. Apr 2002 B1
6398000 Jenrick et al. Jun 2002 B1
6412620 Imura Jul 2002 B1
6431342 Schwartz Aug 2002 B1
6438230 Moore Aug 2002 B1
6456928 Johnson Sep 2002 B1
6459806 Raterman et al. Oct 2002 B1
6460705 Hallowell Oct 2002 B1
6471030 Neubarth et al. Oct 2002 B1
6474548 Montross et al. Nov 2002 B1
6484863 Molbak Nov 2002 B1
6484884 Gerrity et al. Nov 2002 B1
6493461 Mennie et al. Dec 2002 B1
6494776 Molbak Dec 2002 B1
6499277 Warner et al. Dec 2002 B1
6503138 Spoehr et al. Jan 2003 B2
6520308 Martin et al. Feb 2003 B1
6522772 Morrison et al. Feb 2003 B1
6539104 Raterman et al. Mar 2003 B1
6547131 Foodman et al. Apr 2003 B1
6552781 Rompel et al. Apr 2003 B1
6554185 Montross et al. Apr 2003 B1
6560355 Graves et al. May 2003 B2
6579165 Kuhlin et al. Jun 2003 B2
6581042 Pare, Jr. et al. Jun 2003 B2
6588569 Jenrick et al. Jul 2003 B1
6601687 Jenrick et al. Aug 2003 B1
6602125 Martin Aug 2003 B2
6603872 Jones et al. Aug 2003 B2
6609604 Jones et al. Aug 2003 B1
6612921 Geib et al. Sep 2003 B2
6621919 Mennie et al. Sep 2003 B2
6628816 Mennie et al. Sep 2003 B2
6636624 Raterman et al. Oct 2003 B2
6637576 Jones et al. Oct 2003 B1
6640956 Zwieg et al. Nov 2003 B1
6644696 Brown et al. Nov 2003 B2
6647136 Jones et al. Nov 2003 B2
6650767 Jones et al. Nov 2003 B2
6654486 Jones et al. Nov 2003 B2
6655585 Shinn Dec 2003 B2
6659259 Knox et al. Dec 2003 B2
6661910 Jones et al. Dec 2003 B2
6662166 Pare, Jr. et al. Dec 2003 B2
6663675 Blake et al. Dec 2003 B2
6665431 Jones et al. Dec 2003 B2
6666318 Gerrity et al. Dec 2003 B2
6678401 Jones et al. Jan 2004 B2
6678402 Jones et al. Jan 2004 B2
6705470 Klein et al. Mar 2004 B2
6721442 Mennie et al. Apr 2004 B1
6724926 Jones et al. Apr 2004 B2
6724927 Jones et al. Apr 2004 B2
6731785 Mennie et al. May 2004 B1
6731786 Jones et al. May 2004 B2
6748101 Jones et al. Jun 2004 B1
6755730 Geib et al. Jun 2004 B2
6758316 Molbak Jul 2004 B2
6761308 Hanna et al. Jul 2004 B1
6766892 Martin et al. Jul 2004 B2
6778693 Jones et al. Aug 2004 B2
6783452 Hino et al. Aug 2004 B2
6783785 Raghavan et al. Aug 2004 B1
6786398 Stinson et al. Sep 2004 B1
6798899 Mennie et al. Sep 2004 B2
6810137 Jones et al. Oct 2004 B2
6843418 Jones et al. Jan 2005 B2
6854581 Molbak Feb 2005 B2
6854640 Peklo Feb 2005 B2
6860375 Hallowell et al. Mar 2005 B2
6863168 Gerrity et al. Mar 2005 B1
6866134 Stromme et al. Mar 2005 B2
6868954 Stromme et al. Mar 2005 B2
6880692 Mazur et al. Apr 2005 B1
6892871 Strauts et al. May 2005 B2
6896118 Jones et al. May 2005 B2
6913130 Mazur et al. Jul 2005 B1
6913260 Maier et al. Jul 2005 B2
6915893 Mennie Jul 2005 B2
6928546 Nanavati et al. Aug 2005 B1
6929109 Klein et al. Aug 2005 B1
6950810 Lapsley et al. Sep 2005 B2
6953150 Shepley et al. Oct 2005 B2
6955253 Mazur et al. Oct 2005 B1
6957733 Mazur et al. Oct 2005 B2
6957746 Martin et al. Oct 2005 B2
6959800 Mazur et al. Nov 2005 B1
6962247 Maier et al. Nov 2005 B2
6966417 Peklo et al. Nov 2005 B2
6976570 Molbak Dec 2005 B2
6980684 Munro et al. Dec 2005 B1
6988606 Geib et al. Jan 2006 B2
6991530 Hino et al. Jan 2006 B2
6994200 Jenrick et al. Feb 2006 B2
6996263 Jones et al. Feb 2006 B2
7000828 Jones Feb 2006 B2
7004831 Hino et al. Feb 2006 B2
7014029 Winters Mar 2006 B2
7014108 Sorenson et al. Mar 2006 B2
7016767 Jones et al. Mar 2006 B2
7017729 Gerrity et al. Mar 2006 B2
7018286 Blake et al. Mar 2006 B2
7028827 Molbak et al. Apr 2006 B1
7036651 Tam et al. May 2006 B2
7082216 Jones et al. Jul 2006 B2
7083036 Adams Aug 2006 B2
7092560 Jones et al. Aug 2006 B2
7103206 Graves et al. Sep 2006 B2
7103438 Hallowell et al. Sep 2006 B2
7113929 Beach et al. Sep 2006 B1
7131580 Molbak Nov 2006 B2
7146245 Jones et al. Dec 2006 B2
7149336 Jones et al. Dec 2006 B2
7152727 Waechter Dec 2006 B2
7158662 Chiles Jan 2007 B2
7171032 Jones et al. Jan 2007 B2
7187795 Jones et al. Mar 2007 B2
7188720 Geib et al. Mar 2007 B2
7191657 Maier et al. Mar 2007 B2
7197173 Jones et al. Mar 2007 B2
7200255 Jones et al. Apr 2007 B2
7201320 Csulits et al. Apr 2007 B2
7213697 Martin et al. May 2007 B2
7232024 Mazur et al. Jun 2007 B2
7243773 Bochonok et al. Jul 2007 B2
7248731 Raterman et al. Jul 2007 B2
7256874 Csulits et al. Aug 2007 B2
7269279 Chiles Sep 2007 B2
7303119 Molbak Dec 2007 B2
7331521 Sorenson et al. Feb 2008 B2
7337890 Bochonok et al. Mar 2008 B2
7349566 Jones et al. Mar 2008 B2
7362891 Jones et al. Apr 2008 B2
7366338 Jones et al. Apr 2008 B2
7391897 Jones et al. Jun 2008 B2
7427230 Blake et al. Sep 2008 B2
7438172 Long et al. Oct 2008 B2
7464802 Gerrity et al. Dec 2008 B2
7505831 Jones et al. Mar 2009 B2
7520374 Martin et al. Apr 2009 B2
7536046 Raterman et al. May 2009 B2
7542598 Jones et al. Jun 2009 B2
7551764 Chiles et al. Jun 2009 B2
7552810 Mecklenburg Jun 2009 B2
7580859 Economy Aug 2009 B2
7590274 Raterman et al. Sep 2009 B2
7591428 Freeman et al. Sep 2009 B2
7599543 Jones et al. Oct 2009 B2
7600626 Hallowell et al. Oct 2009 B2
7602956 Jones et al. Oct 2009 B2
7619721 Jones et al. Nov 2009 B2
7620231 Jones et al. Nov 2009 B2
7628326 Freeman et al. Dec 2009 B2
7635082 Jones Dec 2009 B2
7647275 Jones Jan 2010 B2
7650980 Jenrick et al. Jan 2010 B2
7654450 Mateen et al. Feb 2010 B2
7658270 Bochonok et al. Feb 2010 B2
7672499 Raterman et al. Mar 2010 B2
7686151 Renz et al. Mar 2010 B2
7726457 Maier et al. Jun 2010 B2
7735621 Hallowell et al. Jun 2010 B2
7743902 Wendell et al. Jun 2010 B2
7753189 Maier et al. Jul 2010 B2
7762380 Freeman et al. Jul 2010 B2
7778456 Jones et al. Aug 2010 B2
7779982 Fitzgerald et al. Aug 2010 B2
7817842 Mennie Oct 2010 B2
7819308 Osterberg et al. Oct 2010 B2
7849994 Klein et al. Dec 2010 B2
7873576 Jones et al. Jan 2011 B2
7874478 Molbak Jan 2011 B2
7881519 Jones et al. Feb 2011 B2
7882000 Jones Feb 2011 B2
7886890 Blake et al. Feb 2011 B2
7903863 Jones et al. Mar 2011 B2
7929749 Jones et al. Apr 2011 B1
7931304 Brown et al. Apr 2011 B2
7938245 Jenrick et al. May 2011 B2
7946406 Blake et al. May 2011 B2
7949582 Mennie et al. May 2011 B2
7980378 Jones et al. Jul 2011 B2
8023715 Jones et al. Sep 2011 B2
8041098 Jones et al. Oct 2011 B2
8103084 Jones et al. Jan 2012 B2
8125624 Jones et al. Feb 2012 B2
8126793 Jones Feb 2012 B2
8162125 Csulits et al. Apr 2012 B1
8169602 Jones et al. May 2012 B2
8204293 Csulits et al. Jun 2012 B2
8297428 Renz et al. Oct 2012 B2
8322505 Freeman et al. Dec 2012 B2
8331643 Yacoubian et al. Dec 2012 B2
8339589 Jones et al. Dec 2012 B2
8346610 Mennie et al. Jan 2013 B2
8352322 Mennie et al. Jan 2013 B2
8380573 Jones et al. Feb 2013 B2
8391583 Mennie et al. Mar 2013 B1
8396278 Jones et al. Mar 2013 B2
8396586 Klein et al. Mar 2013 B2
8401268 Yacoubian et al. Mar 2013 B1
8413888 Jones Apr 2013 B2
8417017 Beutel et al. Apr 2013 B1
20010006557 Mennie et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010015311 Mennie Aug 2001 A1
20010019624 Raterman et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010034203 Geib et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010035603 Graves et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010048025 Shinn Dec 2001 A1
20020001393 Jones et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020020603 Jones et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020056605 Mazur et al. May 2002 A1
20020065033 Geib et al. May 2002 A1
20020069104 Beach et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020074209 Karlsson Jun 2002 A1
20020085245 Mennie et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020085745 Jones et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020095587 Doyle et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020103757 Jones et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020104785 Klein et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020107738 Beach et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020107801 Jones et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020118871 Jones et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020122580 Jones et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020126885 Mennie et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020126886 Jones et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020130011 Casanova et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020131630 Jones et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020136442 Jones et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020145035 Jones Oct 2002 A1
20020147588 Davis et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020151267 Kuhlin et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020154804 Jones et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020154805 Jones et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020154806 Jones et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020154807 Jones et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020154808 Jones et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020174348 Ting Nov 2002 A1
20020179401 Knox et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020186876 Jones et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030004878 Akutsu et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030009420 Jones Jan 2003 A1
20030013403 Blake et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030015395 Hallowell et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030015396 Mennie Jan 2003 A1
20030059098 Jones et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030062242 Hallowell et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030081824 Mennie et al. May 2003 A1
20030108233 Raterman et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030121752 Stromme et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030121753 Stromme et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030127299 Jones et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030132281 Jones et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030139994 Jones Jul 2003 A1
20030168308 Maier et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030168309 Geib et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030168310 Strauts et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030174874 Raterman et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030182217 Chiles Sep 2003 A1
20030190882 Blake et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030198373 Raterman et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030202690 Jones et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030234153 Blake et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040003980 Hallowell et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040016621 Jenrick et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040016797 Jones et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040028266 Jones et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040055902 Peklo Mar 2004 A1
20040083149 Jones Apr 2004 A1
20040092222 Kowalczyk et al. May 2004 A1
20040145726 Csulits et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040149538 Sakowski Aug 2004 A1
20040153406 Alarcon-Luther et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040153408 Jones et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040153421 Robinson Aug 2004 A1
20040154899 Peklo et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040154964 Jones Aug 2004 A1
20040173432 Jones Sep 2004 A1
20040182675 Long et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040188221 Carter Sep 2004 A1
20040200691 Geib et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040251110 Jenrick et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040256197 Blake et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050006197 Wendell et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050029168 Jones et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050035034 Long et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050035140 Carter Feb 2005 A1
20050040007 Geib et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050040225 Csulits et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050045450 Geib et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050047642 Jones et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050060055 Hallowell et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050060059 Klein et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050060061 Jones Mar 2005 A1
20050067305 Bochonok et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050077142 Tam et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050086271 Jones et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050087422 Maier et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050087425 Peklo Apr 2005 A1
20050108165 Jones et al. May 2005 A1
20050109836 Ben-Aissa May 2005 A1
20050117791 Raterman et al. Jun 2005 A2
20050117792 Graves et al. Jun 2005 A2
20050124407 Rowe Jun 2005 A1
20050150738 Hallowell et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050156318 Douglas Jul 2005 A1
20050163361 Jones et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050163362 Jones et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050169511 Jones Aug 2005 A1
20050173221 Maier et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050183928 Jones et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050205654 Carter Sep 2005 A1
20050205655 Carter Sep 2005 A1
20050207634 Jones et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050213803 Mennie Sep 2005 A1
20050228717 Gusler et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050241909 Mazur et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050249394 Jones et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050256792 Shimizu et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050265591 Jones et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050276458 Jones et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050278239 Jones et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060010071 Jones et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060037835 Doran et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060054455 Kuykendall et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060054457 Long et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060060363 Carter Mar 2006 A2
20060064379 Doran et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069654 Beach et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060078186 Freeman et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060148394 Blake et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060149415 Richards Jul 2006 A1
20060151285 String Jul 2006 A1
20060154589 String Jul 2006 A1
20060157390 Otsuka Jul 2006 A1
20060175176 Blake Aug 2006 A1
20060182330 Chiles Aug 2006 A1
20060195567 Mody et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060196754 Bochonok et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060205481 Dominelli Sep 2006 A1
20060207856 Dean et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060210137 Raterman et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060219519 Molbak et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060274929 Jones et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060283685 Cousin Dec 2006 A1
20070000819 Yui Jan 2007 A1
20070051582 Bochonok et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070071302 Jones et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070076939 Jones et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070078560 Jones et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070095630 Mennie et al. May 2007 A1
20070108015 Bochonok et al. May 2007 A1
20070112674 Jones May 2007 A1
20070119681 Blake et al. May 2007 A1
20070122023 Jenrick et al. May 2007 A1
20070172107 Jones et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070181676 Mateen et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070187494 Hanna Aug 2007 A1
20070209904 Freeman et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070221470 Mennie et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070237381 Mennie et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070258633 Jones et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070269097 Chiles et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070278064 Hallowell et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080006505 Renz et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080033829 Mennie et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080044077 Mennie et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080060906 Fitzgerald et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080123932 Jones et al. May 2008 A1
20080133411 Jones et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080177420 Klein et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080219543 Csulits et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080220707 Jones et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080285838 Jones et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090001661 Klein et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090018959 Doran et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090022390 Yacoubian et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090087076 Jenrick et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090090779 Freeman et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090236200 Hallowell et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090236201 Blake et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090239459 Watts et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090242626 Jones et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090310188 Jones et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090313159 Jones et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090320106 Jones et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100034454 Jones et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100038419 Blake et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100051687 Jones et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100057617 Jones et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100063916 Jones et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100092065 Jones et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100108463 Renz et al. May 2010 A1
20100116619 Jones May 2010 A1
20100163366 Jenrick et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100198726 Doran et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100236892 Jones et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100261421 Wendell et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100263984 Freeman et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100276485 Jones et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100327005 Martin et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110087599 Jones Apr 2011 A1
20110098845 Mennie et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110099105 Mennie et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110206267 Jones et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110215034 Mennie et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110220717 Jones et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110255767 Jenrick et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110258113 Jones et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120008131 Jones et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120008850 Jones et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120013891 Jones et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120013892 Jones et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120150745 Csulits et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120185083 Klein et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120189186 Csulits et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120215689 Jones Aug 2012 A1
20120321170 Jones Dec 2012 A2
20130068585 Freeman et al. Mar 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (126)
Number Date Country
2235925 Nov 1995 CA
2189330 Dec 2000 CA
2143943 Mar 2003 CA
2 624 638 Dec 2007 CA
2 684 159 Apr 2010 CA
06 60 354 May 1938 DE
30 21 327 Dec 1981 DE
0 351 217 Jan 1990 EP
0 667 973 Jan 1997 EP
0 926 634 Jun 1999 EP
1 104 920 Jun 2001 EP
1 209 639 May 2002 EP
1 528 513 May 2005 EP
2042254 Feb 1971 FR
2035642 Jun 1980 GB
2175427 Nov 1986 GB
2198274 Jun 1988 GB
2 464 826 May 2010 GB
49-058899 Jun 1974 JP
52-014495 Feb 1977 JP
52-071300 Jun 1977 JP
56-040992 Apr 1981 JP
57-117080 Jul 1982 JP
59-079392 May 1984 JP
60-016271 Feb 1985 JP
59-130581 Jul 1987 JP
62-163195 Jul 1987 JP
62-134168 Aug 1987 JP
62-182995 Aug 1987 JP
62-221773 Sep 1987 JP
62-166562 Oct 1987 JP
54-118138 Sep 1988 JP
64-035683 Feb 1989 JP
64-042789 Feb 1989 JP
64-067698 Mar 1989 JP
01-118995 May 1989 JP
01-307891 Dec 1989 JP
02-050793 Feb 1990 JP
02-252096 Oct 1990 JP
03-012776 Jan 1991 JP
03-063795 Mar 1991 JP
03-092994 Apr 1991 JP
03-156673 Jul 1991 JP
3-188592 Aug 1991 JP
04-085695 Mar 1992 JP
04-175993 Jun 1992 JP
05-046839 Feb 1993 JP
05-217048 Aug 1993 JP
05-274527 Oct 1993 JP
06-035946 Feb 1994 JP
06-103285 Apr 1994 JP
09-251566 Sep 1997 JP
2002-117439 Apr 2002 JP
2003-242287 Aug 2003 JP
2004-213188 Jul 2004 JP
WO 8500909 Feb 1985 WO
WO 9111778 Aug 1991 WO
WO 9217394 Oct 1992 WO
WO 9309621 May 1993 WO
WO 9323824 Nov 1993 WO
WO 9406101 Mar 1994 WO
WO 9524691 Sep 1995 WO
WO 9610800 Apr 1996 WO
WO 9636933 Nov 1996 WO
WO 9725692 Jul 1997 WO
WO 9730422 Aug 1997 WO
WO 9743734 Nov 1997 WO
WO 9745810 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9812662 Mar 1998 WO
WO 9813785 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9824041 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9824052 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9824067 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9835323 Aug 1998 WO
WO 9840839 Sep 1998 WO
WO 9847100 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9848383 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9848384 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9848385 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9850892 Nov 1998 WO
WO 9851082 Nov 1998 WO
WO 9900776 Jan 1999 WO
WO 9909511 Feb 1999 WO
WO 9914668 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9923601 May 1999 WO
WO 9933030 Jul 1999 WO
WO 9941695 Aug 1999 WO
WO 9948040 Sep 1999 WO
WO 9948042 Sep 1999 WO
WO 0024572 May 2000 WO
WO 0065546 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0108108 Feb 2001 WO
WO 0159685 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0159723 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0229735 Apr 2002 WO
WO 02054360 Jul 2002 WO
WO 03005312 Jan 2003 WO
WO 03028361 Apr 2003 WO
WO 03029913 Apr 2003 WO
WO 03030113 Apr 2003 WO
WO 03052700 Jun 2003 WO
WO 03067532 Aug 2003 WO
WO 03107282 Dec 2003 WO
WO 2004010367 Jan 2004 WO
WO 2004027717 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004036508 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004038631 May 2004 WO
WO 2004068422 Aug 2004 WO
WO 2005013209 Feb 2005 WO
WO 2005017842 Feb 2005 WO
WO 2005028348 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005029240 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005036445 Apr 2005 WO
WO 2005041134 May 2005 WO
WO 2005076229 Aug 2005 WO
WO 2005118443 Dec 2005 WO
WO 2006039439 Apr 2006 WO
WO 2006076289 Jul 2006 WO
WO 2006076634 Jul 2006 WO
WO 2007035420 Mar 2007 WO
WO 2007044570 Apr 2007 WO
WO 2007120825 Oct 2007 WO
WO 2007143128 Dec 2007 WO
WO 2008030356 Mar 2008 WO
WO 2008112132 Sep 2008 WO
WO 2011109569 Sep 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (57)
Entry
Amiel Industries: AI-1500 ‘Pulsar’ High Performance Sorting and Bagging Machine, 13 pages (date unknown, but prior to Dec. 14, 2000).
AUI: Coinverter—“No More Lines . . . Self-Serve Cash-Out,” by Cassius Elston, 1995 World Games Congress/Exposition Converter, 1 page (dated prior to 1995).
Brandt: 95 Series Coin Sorter Counter, 2 pages (1982).
Brandt: Model 817 Automated Coin and Currency Ordering System, 2 pages (1983).
Brandt: Model 920/925 Counter, 2 pages (date unknown, prior to Jul. 2011, possibly prior to Mar. 17, 1997).
Brandt: System 930 Electric Counter/Sorter, “Solving Problems, Pleasing Customer, Building Deposits,” 1 page (date unknown, prior to Mar. 2, 2011, possibly prior to Mar. 17, 1997).
Brandt: Model 940-6 High Speed Sorter/Counter, 2 pages (date unknown, prior to Oct. 31, 1989).
Brandt: System 945 High-Speed Sorter, 2 pages (date unknown, prior to Mar. 2, 2011, possibly prior to Mar. 17, 1997).
Brandt: Model 952 Coin Sorter/Counter, 2 pages (date unknown, prior to Oct. 31, 1989).
Brandt: Model 954 Coin Sorter/Counter, 2 pages (date unknown, prior to Oct. 31, 1989).
Brandt: Model 957 Coin Sorter/Counter, 2 pages (date unknown, prior to Oct. 31, 1989).
Brandt: Model 958 Coin Sorter/Counter, 5 pages (© 1982).
Brandt: Model 960 High-Speed Coin Sorter & Counter, 2 pages (1984).
Brandt; Model 966 Microsort™ Coin Sorter and Counter, 4 pages, (1979).
Brandt: Model 970 Coin Sorter and Counter, 2 pages (1983).
Brandt: Model 1205 Coin Sorter Counter, 2 pages (1986).
Brandt: Model 1400 Coin Sorter Counter, 2 pages (date unknown, prior to Mar. 2, 2011, possibly prior to Mar. 17, 1997).
Brandt: Model 8904 Upfeed—“High Speed 4-Denomination Currency Dispenser,” 2 pages (1989).
Brandt: Mach 7 High-Speed Coin Sorter/Counter, 2 pages (1992).
Case ICC Limited: CDS Automated Receipt Giving Cash Deposit System, 3 pages (date unknown, prior to Nov. 15, 2000).
Childers Corporation: Computerized Sorter/Counter, “To coin an old adage, time is money..,”3 pages (1981).
CTcoin: CDS602 Cash Deposit System, 1 page (date unknown, prior to Jan. 15, 2001).
Cummins: Cash Information and Settlement Systems (Form 023-1408), 4 pages (date Dec. 1991).
Cummins: The Universal Solution to All Coin and Currency Processing Needs (Form 13C1218 3-83), 1 page (Mar. 1983).
Cummins: JetSort® High Speed Sorter/Counter Kits I & J—Operating Instructions (Form 022-7123-00) 12 pages (1994).
Cummins: JetSort® Coin Sorter Counter/CA-130XL Coin Wrapper, Cummins Automated Money Systems (AMS) Case Study—Fifth-Third, “6,000 Coin Per Minute Counter/Sorter Keeps pace With Fifth-Third Bank's Money Processing Needs,” (Form 13C1180), 2 pages (Nov. 1981).
Cummins: JetSort®, “Venders Love JetSort,” (13C1255), 1 page (Mar. 1987).
Cummins: JetSort® “High Speed Coin Sorter & Counter for Payphone Applications,” “CTOCS Ready” (Form 023-1365), 2 pages (Mar. 1989).
Cummins: JetSort® mailer, “One moving part simplicity,” “Vendors—Are validators changing your coin and currency needs?” (Form 023-1297), 3 pages (Apr. 1987).
Cummins: JetSort® Series V High Speed Coin Sorter/Counter, (Form 023-1383), 2 pages (Sep. 1990).
Cummins: JetSort® “Time for a Change, Be a smashing success!,” (Form 023-1328), 1 page (Jun. 1988).
Cummins: JetSort® “Time for a Change—JetSort® vs. Brandt X,” (Form 023-1330), 1 page (Jun. 1988).
Cummins: JetSort® “Time for a Change—No Coins Sorted After 3:00 or on Saturday,” (Form 023-1327), 1 page (Aug. 1988).
Cummins: JetSort®, “What do all these Banks have in Common . . . ?”, JetSort, CA-130XL coin wrapper, CA-118 coin wrapper, CA-4000 JetCount, (13C1203), 3 pages (Aug. 1982).
Cummins: JetSort® 700-01/CA-118 Coin Wrapper, Cummins Automated Money Systems (AMS) Case Study—University State Bank, “Cummins Money Processing System Boosts Teller Service at University State Bank,” (Form 13C1192), 2 pages (Mar. 1982).
Cummins: JetSort® 700-01, Cummins Automated Money Systems (AMS) Case Study—First State Bank of Oregon, “JetSort® Gives Bank Coin Service Edge,” (Form 13C1196), 2 pages (Apr. 1982).
Cummins: JetSort® 700-01 Coin Sorter/Counter, Operating Instructions, 14 pages (1982).
Cummins: JetSort® 701, Cummins Automated Money Systems (AMS) Case Study—Convenco Vending, “High Speed Coin Sorter increases coin processing power at Convenco Vending,” (Form 13C1226), 2 pages (Jul. 1983).
Cummins: JetSort® Model CA-750 Coin Processor (Item No. 50-152), 1 page (Jul. 1984).
Cummins: JetSort® Model CA-750 Coin Sorter/Counter and CA-4050 JetCount currency counter, “Money Processing Made Easy,” (Form 13C1221) 2 pages (Jun. 1983).
Cummins: JetSort® Model 1701 with JetStops, Operating Instructions Manual (Form 022-1329-00), 16 pages (1984).
Cummins: JetSort® Model 1760 brochure, (Form 023-1262-00), 2 pages (Jul. 1985).
Cummins: JetSort® Models 1770 and 3000, Communication Package specification and operating instructions, 10 pages (uncertain, possibly Nov. 1985).
Cummins: JetSort® Model 1770, “JetSort® Speed and Accuracy, Now with Communications!”, (Form 023-1272) 1 page (Oct. 1986).
Cummins: JetSort® 2000 Series High Speed Coin Sorter/Counter (Form 023-1488), 2 pages (Oct. 2000).
Cummins: JetSort® 3000 Series High Speed Coin Sorter (Form 023-1468 Rev 1), 2 pages (Feb. 1995).
Cummins: JetSort® 3000 Series Options, “Talking JetSort 3000,” (Form 023-1338-00), 1 page (between Jan. 1989-Feb. 1989).
Cummins: JetSort® 3000, “3,000 Coins per Minute!,” (Form 023-1312), 1 page (date unknown, est. 1987).
Cummins: JetSort® 3200, Enhanced electronics for the JetSort® 3200 (Form 023-1350), 1 page (Apr. 1987).
Diebold: Merchant MicroBranch, “Merchant MicroBranch Combines ATM After-Hour Depository Rolled-Coin Dispenser,” Bank Technology News, 1 page (Nov. 1997).
Fa. GBS-Geldbearbeitungssysteme: GBS9401SB Technical Specification, 24 pages (date unknown, prior to Nov. 10, 2010).
Frisco Bay: Commercial Kiosk, “Provide self-service solutions for your business customers,” 4 pages (date unknown, prior to Mar. 2, 2011, p. 4 has date 1996).
Glory: AMT Automated Merchant Teller, 4 pages (date unknown, prior to Jan. 15, 2001).
Glory: CRS-8000 Cash Redemption System, 2 pages (1996).
International Search Repot, PCT/US2006/039234, 2 pages, dated Jun 12, 2007.
Written Opinion, PCT/US2006/039234, 7 pages, dated Jun 12, 2007.
Third Party Submission , U.S. Appl. No. 11/544,228, 2 pages, dated Jul. 31, 2007.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110255767 A1 Oct 2011 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60723652 Oct 2005 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11544228 Oct 2006 US
Child 13169307 US