Counterfeiting is a major issue in the retail industry. Most enterprises use ad hoc approaches such as using special pens to mark bills or holding the bills up to a light for inspection. Moreover, most enterprises only check bills of high denominations, such as $50, $100 or passports.
Counterfeiters are growing smarter to the techniques and procedures of stores and will pass a larger number of smaller bills that they know are not likely to be checked. The counterfeiters may also only frequent a store once or twice before moving on to pass bad bills at different locations sometimes far away from the initial store where bad bills were passed.
When a store attempts to deposit counterfeit bills with its bank, the counterfeits are discovered resulting in a loss of funds to the store. Counterfeit bills are theft to a store and very costly and such costs are generally passed on to the consumers in terms of higher item prices.
Furthermore, some store clerks may do a poor job of checking for counterfeits during high traffic times at the store. In fact, some times the clerk may not check at all. Diligent clerks that check excessively well may anger loyal customers that are waiting to checkout during high line queue waits. This can cause a store to lose a valuable customer with dissatisfaction.
Therefore, there is a need for more efficient currency validation at a retail checkout.
In various embodiments, a method for currency validation, a system for currency validation, and a currency validation device are presented.
According to an embodiment, a method for currency validation is provided. Specifically, a currency validation device is directed to illuminate a currency bill placed in proximity to a camera using a selected light source. Next, the camera is instructed to take an image of the illuminated currency bill. Finally, the image is presented in a screen of a display for validation by an operator (e.g., clerk, etc.).
It is also noted that
The currency validation system of the
The
It is noted that different currencies or different denominations of a same country's currency can have different security features exposed based on different types of light illuminated on the currency. So, some currencies may present different features under IR illumination from that what is achieved with UV or white light illumination.
Moreover, it is noted that when a customer hands a bill (currency) to a checkout clerk and the checkout clerk places the bill in front of the imager (camera) to capture the image.
In an embodiment, the currency validation device is the controller and the LED arrays depicted in the
The LED board includes one or more (or an array of IR LEDs) and one or more (or an array of UV LEDs). Although not shown, the LED board may include one or more (or an array of white LEDs).
The LED board is electrically coupled to the controller board. The controller board includes an LED board interface for selectively activating the LEDS on the LED board to illuminate currency placed in front of a camera, the camera taking the image of the currency while illuminated. The controller board also includes a microcontroller or processor having memory and or non-volatile storage. Moreover, the controller includes a programming interface for programming the microcontroller and a device port, such as a USB port.
In an embodiment, the device port is a Bluetooth port.
In an embodiment, the device port is a WiFi port.
In an embodiment, the device port is a cable port.
In an embodiment, the device port is an Ethernet port.
In an embodiment, the device port is a firewire port.
In an embodiment, the controller includes a camera interface for directly interacting with a camera.
The controller can be integrated into any device, such as a Personal Computer, a wearable processing device, a scanner, and the like. The device capable of being interfaced to a camera to image the currency illuminated by the LEDS.
In an embodiment, the currency validator is processed by POS device.
In an embodiment, the currency validator is processed by a scanner.
In an embodiment, the currency validator is processed by a laptop.
In an embodiment, the currency validator is processed by a tablet.
In an embodiment, the currency validator is processed by a desktop computer (PC).
In an embodiment, the currency validator is processed by a wearable processing device.
At 210, the currency validator directs a currency validation device (such as the controller of the
In an embodiment, at 211, the currency validator obtains a selection for the light source (type of light to use for the illumination).
In an embodiment of 211 and at 212, the currency validator identifies the light source as one of: UV light, IR light, and white light.
In another embodiment of 211 and at 213, the currency validator identifies the light source as a combination of two or more light sources identified from: UV light, IR light, and white light.
In an embodiment, at 214, the currency validator sends, by a scanner, an instruction to the currency validation device to illuminate the currency bill.
In an embodiment, at 215, the currency validator sends, by a POS device, an instruction to the currency validation device to illuminate the currency bill.
In an embodiment, at 216, the currency validator sends, by one of: a laptop, a PC, a tablet, and a wearable processing device, an instruction to the currency validation device to illuminate the currency bill.
At 220, the currency validator instructs the camera to take an image of the illuminated currency bill with the selected light source and type of light.
At 230, the currency validator presents the image in a screen of a display for validation, such as by a clerk operating a checkout station.
For example, at 231, the currency validator present the image in the screen of the display, where the display is a checkout station and the clerk inspects the image for validation on the screen during a transaction with a customer. The customer presented the currency to the clerk for payment of the transaction.
According to an embodiment, at 240, the currency validator sends the image to an image processor for validating the currency based on: the light source that illuminated the currency, a denomination for the currency, and a government associated with issuing the currency.
The currency validation system 300 includes a POS device 310, a scanner 320, and a currency validation device 330. The POS device 310 may, optionally, include an image processor 311. The scanner 320 includes an integrated camera 321. Optionally, the currency validation system 300 includes a remote and networked image processor 340.
The scanner 320 is interfaced to the POS device 310.
The currency validation device 330 is adapted and configured to: selectively activate different types of light sources to illuminate currency situated in front of the camera or in proximity to a field of view of the camera.
The camera 321 is adapted and configured to image the illuminated currency. The POS device 310 is adapted and configured to present the image within a screen of a display associated with the POS device 310 for currency validation.
In an embodiment, the POS device 310 is adapted and configured to control operation of the currency validation device 330.
In an embodiment, the scanner 320 is adapted and configured to control operation of the currency validation device 330.
In an embodiment, the image processor (311 or 340) is configured and adapted to: recognize attributes in the image based on a type of light source that illuminated the currency when the image was taken, and compare the attributes against predefined attributes to automatically determine whether the currency is valid of counterfeit.
As mentioned above, the image processor 311 may in integrated into the POS device 310 or the image processor 340 may be remotely located over a network from the POS device 310 and interfaced to the POS device 310 over that network.
In an embodiment, the currency validation system 300 is the single currency validation system depicted in the
In an embodiment, the currency validation device 400 is the controller and LEDs of the
In an embodiment, the currency validation device 400 is the LED boards interfaced to or coupled to the controller board of the
The currency validation device 400 includes at least one light board 410 and a controller board 420.
In an embodiment, the currency validation device 400 includes a single LED board having arrays of LEDs for IR 411, white light 412, and UV 413.
The light board 410 includes at least two different types of light, such as IR LEDs 411 and UV LEDs 413.
In an embodiment, multiple light boards 410 exist with each light board 410 having a different type of light.
The controller board 420 includes a light board interface module 421 coupled to the light board 410 and a microcontroller 422 configured and adapted to selectively activate one or more of the at least two different types of light to illuminate the currency that is imaged by a camera.
According to an embodiment, the controller board 420 further includes a programming interface module 423 configured and adapted to interface to a second device to custom program the microcontroller 422.
In an embodiment, the controller board 420 further includes a device connector port configured and adapted to connect to a second device that controls the selective activation of the at least two different types of light.
In an embodiment of the latter embodiment, the second device is one or more of: a camera, a scanner, a POS device, a tablet, a laptop, a wearable processing device, and a phone.
It should be appreciated that where software is described in a particular form (such as a component or module) this is merely to aid understanding and is not intended to limit how software that implements those functions may be architected or structured. For example, modules are illustrated as separate modules, but may be implemented as homogenous code, as individual components, some, but not all of these modules may be combined, or the functions may be implemented in software structured in any other convenient manner.
Furthermore, although the software modules are illustrated as executing on one piece of hardware, the software may be distributed over multiple processors or in any other convenient manner.
The above description is illustrative, and not restrictive. Many other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The scope of embodiments should therefore be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
In the foregoing description of the embodiments, various features are grouped together in a single embodiment for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting that the claimed embodiments have more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Description of the Embodiments, with each claim standing on its own as a separate exemplary embodiment.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5640463 | Csulits | Jun 1997 | A |
5668377 | Erickson | Sep 1997 | A |
5727667 | Nye | Mar 1998 | A |
5790693 | Graves | Aug 1998 | A |
5897625 | Gustin | Apr 1999 | A |
5923413 | Laskowski | Jul 1999 | A |
5942759 | Romano | Aug 1999 | A |
6003008 | Postrel | Dec 1999 | A |
6101266 | Laskowski et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6405929 | Ehrhart et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6473165 | Coombs et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6550671 | Brown | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6573983 | Laskowski | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6883706 | Mastie | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7006204 | Coombs et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7158662 | Chiles | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7184133 | Coombs et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7256874 | Csulits | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7724938 | Pareskevakos | May 2010 | B2 |
8086017 | He | Dec 2011 | B2 |
20020153412 | Numata | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163633 | Cohen | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030169899 | Slepyan | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030178282 | Bao | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040188528 | Alasia | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040222283 | Mastie | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040256196 | Yu | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050098625 | Walker | May 2005 | A1 |
20060201775 | Tedesco | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20080037856 | Paraskevakos | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080159614 | He | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090087077 | Nireki | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20110036682 | Koyano | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120217416 | Decoux | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120273698 | Gudgell | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130034290 | Lee | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130044934 | Tolene | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20140152454 | Rabin | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150059086 | Clough | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150287290 | Van Horn | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1241276 | Jan 2000 | CN |
1423800 | Jun 2003 | CN |
2704890 | Jun 2005 | CN |
2872481 | Feb 2007 | CN |
202142123 | Feb 2012 | CN |
102592348 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102011121566 | Jun 2013 | DE |
100813144 | Mar 2008 | KR |
20080078169 | Aug 2008 | KR |
101244424 | Mar 2013 | KR |
Entry |
---|
Translated Version of KR 101244424. |
Santhanam, Kamesh, Sairam Sekaran, Sriram Vaikundam, and Anbu Mani Kumarasamy. “Counterfeit Currency Detection Technique Using Image Processing, Polarization Principle and Holographic Technique.” In Computational Intelligence, Modelling and Simulation (CIMSim), 2013 Fifth International Conference on, pp. 231-235. IEEE, 2013. |
Translated version of CN202142123. |
Translated version of KR20080078169. |
Williams, Marcela M., and Richard G. Anderson. “Currency design in the United States and abroad: counterfeit deterrence and visual accessibility.” Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Saint Louis 89, No. 5 (2007): 371. |
Translated Version of KR 100813144. |
Cycleback, David Rudd. Forensic Light: A Beginner's Guide. Hamerweit Books, 2009. https://cycleback.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/forensic-light-guide.pdf. |
Satanovsky, Gary. “Counterfeit Detection: Infrared Scanners, UV Lights & Multi-Testers.” Fraud Prevention Blog. Mar. 2, 2011. Accessed Mar. 9, 2018. https://blog.fraudfighter.com/bid/54918/Counterfeit-Detection-Infrared-Scanners-UV-Lights-Multi-Testers. |
Bruna, Arcangelo, Giovanni Farinella, Giuseppe Guarnera, and Sebastiano Battiato. “Forgery detection and value identification of Euro banknotes.” Sensors 13, No. 2 (2013): 2515-2529. (Year: 2013). |
Wang, John Zheng. “Digital analysis, comparison, and projection of fingerprints: a new digital device for crime scene investigation.” Invest. Sci. J (2011): 3-8. (Year: 2011). |
European Search Report issued in co-pending European patent application EP15164623.9 dated Oct. 14, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150348350 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |