Current balancing of voltage regulators

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11822359
  • Patent Number
    11,822,359
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, August 25, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 21, 2023
    a year ago
  • Inventors
    • Shohet; Yuval (Maynard, MA, US)
    • Manlick; Robert (Maynard, MA, US)
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Tran; Thienvu V
    • Quddus; Nusrat
    Agents
    • K&L GATES LLP
Abstract
A current-balanced voltage source may include two regulated voltage sources, each having an input and an output, and an amplifier to receive a control voltage at a positive input and a feedback voltage at a negative input. The output of each amplifier is coupled to the input of the respective regulated voltage source. The outputs of the regulated voltage sources are coupled together to source a current to a load. A differential amplifier may include positive and negative differential inputs, and positive and negative differential outputs. The positive differential input is coupled to the output of the first regulated voltage source and the negative differential input is coupled to the output of the second regulated voltage source. The positive differential output provides the feedback to the first regulated voltage source, and the negative differential output provides the feedback to the second regulated voltage source.
Description
FIELD

This disclosure relates generally to the field of voltage supplies for electronic equipment, and specifically to linearly regulated voltage supplies.


BACKGROUND

Contemporary optical communications and other photonic systems make extensive use of photonic integrated circuits that are advantageously mass-produced in various configurations for various purposes.


SUMMARY

In one aspect, a current-balanced linear voltage source may include a first regulated linear voltage source, a second regulated linear voltage source, and a differential amplifier having a positive differential input, a negative differential input, a positive differential output, and a negative differential output. The first regulated linear voltage source may include a first linear voltage source having an input and an output, and a first amplifier operable to receive a control voltage at a first positive input and a first feedback voltage at a first negative input. An output of the first amplifier may be electrically coupled to the input of the first linear voltage source. The second regulated linear voltage source may include a second linear voltage source having an input and an output, and a second amplifier operable to receive a control voltage at a second positive input and a second feedback voltage at a second negative input. An output of the second amplifier may be electrically coupled to the input of the second linear voltage source. The output of the first linear voltage source may be electrically coupled to the output of the second linear voltage source and operable to supply a current to an electrical load. The positive differential input of the differential amplifier may be electrically coupled to the output of the first linear voltage source. The negative differential input of the differential amplifier may be electrically coupled to the output of the second linear voltage source. The positive differential output of the differential amplifier may be operable to provide the first feedback voltage of the first regulated linear voltage source. The negative differential output of the differential amplifier may be operable to provide the second feedback voltage of the second regulated linear voltage source.


In one aspect, a current-balanced linear voltage source system may include a plurality of regulated linear voltage sources. Each of the plurality of regulated linear voltage sources may include a linear voltage source having an input and an output and an amplifier operable to receive a control voltage at a positive input and a feedback voltage at a negative input. An output of the amplifier may be electrically coupled to the input of the linear voltage source, and the outputs of the linear voltage sources may include the plurality of regulated linear voltage sources that are mutually electrically coupled and operable to supply a current to an electrical load. Additionally, the current-balanced linear voltage source system may include a control circuit, which may be composed of a plurality of control inputs and a plurality of control outputs. Each of the plurality of control inputs may be electrically coupled to one of the plurality of linear voltage source outputs of the plurality of regulated linear voltage source. Each of the plurality of control outputs may provide a feedback voltage to, and may be electrically coupled to, one of the negative inputs of the plurality of regulated linear voltage sources.


Although, the disclosure relates to different aspects and aspects, it is understood that the different aspects and embodiments disclosed herein can be integrated, combined, or used together as a combination system, or in part, as separate components, devices, and systems, as appropriate. Thus, each embodiment disclosed herein can be incorporated in each of the aspects to varying degrees as appropriate for a given implementation. Further, the various apparatus, resistors, amplifiers, digital to analog or analog to digital converter circuits, sample and hold circuits, inputs, outputs, ports, channels, components, and parts of the foregoing disclosed herein can be used with any laser, laser-based communication system, ASIC, photonic integrated circuit, tuner, waveguide, fiber, transmitter, transceiver, receiver, and other devices and systems without limitation.


These and other features of the applicant's teachings are set forth herein.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

Unless specified otherwise, the accompanying drawings illustrate aspects of the innovations described herein. Referring to the drawings, wherein like numerals refer to like parts throughout the several views and this specification, several embodiments of presently disclosed principles are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation. The drawings are not intended to be to scale. A more complete understanding of the disclosure may be realized by reference to the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1A depicts a schematic of a first linear voltage regulator, according to one aspect of the disclosure;



FIG. 1B depicts a schematic of a second linear voltage regulator, according to one aspect of the disclosure;



FIG. 2 depicts a schematic of a regulated linear voltage source, including the first linear voltage regulator of FIG. 1A, according to one aspect of the disclosure;



FIG. 3 depicts a small signal analysis of the regulated linear voltage source depicted in FIG. 2, according to one aspect of the disclosure;



FIG. 4 depicts a schematic of a current balancing regulated linear voltage source, according to one aspect of the disclosure;



FIG. 5 depicts a small signal analysis of the current balancing regulated linear voltage source depicted in FIG. 4, according to one aspect of the disclosure;



FIG. 6 depicts graphs illustrating simulations of the operations of the current balancing regulated linear voltage source depicted in FIG. 4, according to one aspect of the disclosure; and



FIG. 7 depicts a small signal analysis of a second current balancing regulated linear voltage source, according to one aspect of the disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following merely illustrates the principles of the disclosure. It will thus be appreciated that those skilled in the art will be able to devise various arrangements which, although not explicitly described or shown herein, embody the principles of the disclosure and are included within its spirit and scope. More particularly, while numerous specific details are set forth, it is understood that embodiments of the disclosure may be practiced without these specific details and in other instances, well-known circuits, structures and techniques have not be shown in order not to obscure the understanding of this disclosure.


Furthermore, all examples and conditional language recited herein are principally intended expressly to be only for pedagogical purposes to aid the reader in understanding the principles of the disclosure and the concepts contributed by the inventor(s) to furthering the art, and are to be construed as being without limitation to such specifically recited examples and conditions.


Moreover, all statements herein reciting principles, aspects, and embodiments of the disclosure, as well as specific examples thereof, are intended to encompass both structural and functional equivalents thereof. Additionally, it is intended that such equivalents include both currently known equivalents as well as equivalents developed in the future, i.e., any elements developed that perform the same function, regardless of structure.


Thus, for example, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the diagrams herein represent conceptual views of illustrative structures embodying the principles of the invention.


In addition, it will be appreciated by those skilled in art that any flow charts, flow diagrams, state transition diagrams, pseudocode, and the like represent various processes, which may be substantially represented in computer readable medium and so executed by a computer or processor, whether or not such computer or processor is explicitly shown.


In the claims hereof any element expressed as a means for performing a specified function is intended to encompass any way of performing that function including, for example, a) a combination of circuit elements which performs that function or b) software in any form, including, therefore, firmware, microcode or the like, combined with appropriate circuitry for executing that software to perform the function. The invention as defined by such claims resides in the fact that the functionalities provided by the various recited means are combined and brought together in the manner which the claims call for. Applicant thus regards any means which can provide those functionalities as equivalent as those shown herein. Finally, and unless otherwise explicitly specified herein, the drawings are not drawn to scale.


Thus, for example, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the diagrams herein represent conceptual views of illustrative structures embodying the principles of the disclosure.


By way of some additional background, it is appreciated that electronic circuits (loads) require stable voltage and current supplies for their operations. Typically, two types of voltage supplies are known: linear voltage supplies and switch mode voltage supplies. Both the linear voltage supply and switch mode voltage supply rely on an output series transistor to source the output current to the load. For the linear voltage supply, the current supplied by the output series transistor is regulated by an amplifier with appropriate feedback control. The switch mode voltage supply uses a digital clock to activate the transistor and control the output current. Typically, the switch mode voltage supply is able to supply a greater amount of current to the load because the output transistor sources current only briefly, due to the clocking circuit, and therefore does not overhead. The linear voltage supply has the output transistor running constantly, and therefore the output current must be controlled to prevent transistor overheating. However, while the typical switch mode voltage supply is able to supply more current than the typical linear voltage supply, the output of the switch mode voltage supply requires significant filtering to remove frequencies associated with the control clock and its harmonics. Some circuit applications that require significant current may be highly sensitive to voltage supply noise. Therefore, there is a need for a high current, very low noise, linear voltage supply.


In one solution, multiple linear voltage supplies may be coupled in parallel so that their individual output currents may add while the supplies all have the same output voltages. However, when two or more regulators operate in parallel without extra feedback control loop, a mismatch between the two regulator circuits (components tolerances, temperature coefficient, internal offsets and so forth) may create an imbalance between the two regulators output voltages, which may lead to an imbalance between the output currents of the two. This imbalance may result in a serious imbalance and some cases may result in an over-load condition and/or result in excessive thermal dissipation as one regulator could source the majoring of the current to the load.



FIGS. 1A and 1B depict schematics of two aspects of linear voltage sources. FIG. 1A depicts a first aspect of a linear voltage source 100a, comprising an output transistor 110a (an NPN transistor) and a feedback amplifier 120. The feedback amplifier 120 may have a positive input and a negative input. The output of the feedback amplifier 120 may be connected to the base of the output transistor 110a. The output transistor 110a may source a current to the load (represented by Rload) at a voltage Vout. The output voltage Vout is also fed back to the feedback amplifier 120 at the negative feedback input. The value of the output voltage Vout may be set by a fixed voltage source, control voltage Vcntl. A set-point current Iset is generated at the set-point resistor Rset based on the control voltage Vcntl. A set-point voltage Vset is supplied to the feedback amplifier 120 at the positive input. As a result of the feedback voltage at the feedback amplifier 120 negative input, the output voltage Vout may be stabilized based on setpoint voltage Vset. If it is desired to have a variable controlled output of the linear voltage source 100a, an adjustable output control voltage Vdac may be used to alter Vset at the positive input of the feedback amplifier 120 via the series resistor Rdac. Thus, a value of a set-point voltage Vset at the positive input of the feedback amplifier 120 may be a function of the combined values of Vdac, Rdac, Vcntl, and Rset. The output voltage Vout of the linear voltage source 100a is thus stabilized to a value determined by Vset. It may be understood that the control voltage Vdac may be generated by any appropriate DC voltage generator circuit. In one non-limiting example, the generator circuit may be an analog circuit, such as a DC voltage source coupled to a variable resistor voltage divider. In another non-limiting example, the generator circuit may be a digital circuit may include a programmable digital to analog circuit.



FIG. 1B depicts a second aspect of a linear voltage source 100b, comprising an output transistor 110b (a PNP transistor), a drive transistor 112 (NPN transistor), and a feedback amplifier 120 having a positive input and a negative input. The output transistor 110b sources current to the load (represented by Rload) at a voltage Vout. The feedback amplifier 120 does not directly control the output transistor 110b, as in linear voltage source 100a (see FIG. 1A). Instead, the feedback amplifier 120 output drives the drive transistor 112, which in turn, drives the output transistor 110b. The output voltage Vout is also fed back to the feedback amplifier 120 at the negative feedback input via resistor Rtop. The value of the output voltage Vout may be set by a control voltage Vfb, which is supplied to the feedback amplifier 120 at the positive input. As a result of the feedback voltage at the feedback amplifier 120, the output voltage Vout may be stabilized based on control voltage Vfb. If it is desired to have a variable controlled output of the linear voltage source 100b, an adjustable output voltage control Vdac may be combined at the negative feedback input of feedback amplifier 120 with the feedback from Vout via the series resistor Rdac. Resistor Rfb may operate in a similar manner as Rset in linear voltage source 100a. Thus, the output voltage Vout of the linear voltage source 100b is stabilized based on a function of the combined values of Vdac, Rdac, Vfb, Rfb and Rtop. It may be understood that the control voltage Vdac may be generated by any appropriate DC voltage generator circuit. In one non-limiting example, the generator circuit may be an analog circuit, such as a DC voltage source coupled to a variable resistor voltage divider. In another non-limiting example, the generator circuit may be a digital circuit may include a programmable digital to analog circuit.


It may be recognized that the linear voltage sources 100a,b may be inherently stable without the variable control voltage (supplied by Vdac). However, the potential time dependent changes of Vdac may lead to Vout instability unless additional feedback is included. FIG. 2 illustrates a regulated linear voltage source 202 having additional stabilizing feedback. The regulated linear voltage source 202 is built from the linear voltage source 200 (similar to linear voltage source 100a in FIG. 1A), including the output transistor 210 (an NPN transistor) and a feedback amplifier 220 having a positive input and a negative input. The internal feedback loop from the output of the output transistor 210 to the negative input of the feedback amplifier 220 is the same as in linear voltage source 200. The feedback amplifier 220 similarly receives setpoint voltage Vset at its positive input, based in part on current Iset generated by voltage Vcntl and resistor Rset.


As depicted in FIG. 1A, variable control voltage Vdac feeds through resistor Rdac directly into the positive input of the feedback amplifier 120. In regulated linear voltage source 202, the variable control voltage Vdac is provided to the positive input of amplifier 222. The output of amplifier 222 (Vx) is then sourced to the positive input of the feedback amplifier 220 via resistor Rx (operating similarly to Rdac in FIG. 1A). The feedback loop is closed through the sourcing of Vout to the negative input of amplifier 222. For the regulated linear voltage source 202 depicted in FIG. 2, Vout is not generated as the output of the output transistor 210. Rather, Vout is measured between a sensing resistor, Rloss, and the equivalent load resistance, Rload. The feedback function at amplifier 222 is based on the summation of voltages Vx and Vout at the negative input of amplifier 222. The ratio between the feedback impedance elements Z2 and Z1 define the feedback gain at amplifier 222. In some aspects, the feedback impedance elements Z2 and Z1 may both comprise resistors. However, Z2 and Z1 may be any appropriate impedance elements including, without limitation, resistors or capacitors, alone or in combination. In general, this disclosure may consider Z2 and Z1 to comprise resistors, although this is not required.


It may be understood that a regulated linear voltage source, such as regulated linear voltage source 202 depicted in FIG. 2, may incorporate a linear voltage source similar to linear voltage source 100b (FIG. 1B) as an alternative to linear voltage source 100a (FIG. 1A). It may further be understood that a regulated linear voltage source may not be restricted to one including either linear voltage sources 100a or 100b. Alternative linear voltage sources are contemplated as forming the current output stage of the regulated linear voltage source.



FIG. 3 illustrates a small-signal analysis of the regulated linear voltage source circuit 202 schematically presented in FIG. 2. References Vx, Vdac, Z2, Z1, Rset, and Rx represent the same elements of FIG. 2. Vfb is the feedback voltage from output Vout1. Summer 323 accepts inputs from both the control voltage Vdac (at the positive input) and the feedback voltage Vfb (at the negative input) and produces an output voltage Vx. As illustrated in FIG. 3, the open-loop gain G(s) is the product of the amplifier gain Z2/Z1 and the voltage divider proportionality value Rset/(Rx+Rset) as depicted in FIG. 2. The feedback factor, H(s), here may be taken as unity. As may be readily determined,










V

o

u

t

1


=


V
dac




G

(
s
)


1
+


G

(
s
)



H

(
s
)









Eq
.


(
1
)








In some configurations, current Iset from Vcntl may flow directly into feedback amplifier 220, thereby eliminating resistors Rset and Rx from the linear voltage source 200. In view of Eq. (1), above, G(s) may be taken as the product of the amplifier gain Z2/Z1 and the voltage divider proportionality value Rset/(Rx+Rset) when Rx=0 and Rset approaches infinity. Under these conditions, Rset/(Rx+Rset) approaches 1 as Rset approaches infinity, so G(s) approaches the amplifier gain Z2/Z1.


As disclosed above, a configuration to increase the current output of a regulated linear voltage source may include connecting multiple regulated linear voltage sources in parallel. It has been noted that simply connecting the outputs of the multiple regulated linear voltage sources together may result in unequal loading on the voltage sources. It is therefore useful to include a feedback component that assures that the output of each regulated linear voltage source contributes equally to the total current supplied to the output load.



FIG. 4 depicts a regulated current-balanced linear voltage source compose of two regulated linear voltage sources 402a and 402b in parallel. Together, the outputs of each regulated linear voltage source are combined to source a current Iout to a load (represented by resistor RL) at a voltage Vout. Each of the regulated linear voltage sources 402a,b is similar in design as the regulated linear voltage source 202 depicted in FIG. 2. Thus regulated linear voltage source 402a is composed of linear voltage source 400a, which may include an output transistor 410a and a feedback amplifier 420a having a positive input and a negative input. Output transistor 410a and feedback amplifier 420a have the same topology as output transistor 210a and feedback amplifier 220 in FIG. 2. For example, the output of feedback amplifier 420a is connected to the base of output transistor 410a. Thus, the voltage output Vou1 of the output transistor 410a, is fed back to the feedback amplifier 420a at the negative input. Linear voltage source 400a further incorporates a set-point control voltage Vcntl and set-point resistor Rset. A set-point voltage Vset is supplied to the feedback amplifier 420a at the positive input. It may be understood that regulated linear voltage source 402b is similarly defined as being composed of linear voltage source 400b, which may include an output transistor 410b and a feedback amplifier 420b having a positive input and a negative input. Output transistor 410b and feedback amplifier 420b also have the same topology as output transistor 210a and feedback amplifier 220 in FIG. 2. For example, the output of feedback amplifier 420b is connected to the base of output transistor 410b. Thus, the voltage output Vou2 of the output transistor 410b, is fed back to the feedback amplifier 420b at the negative input. Linear voltage source 400b further incorporates a set-point control voltage V′cntl and set-point resistor R′set.


Both regulated linear voltage sources 402a,b also have amplifiers, 422a,b, respectively, that operate similarly to amplifier 222 in FIG. 2. Both amplifiers 422a and 422b receive a positive input from a control voltage Vdac at their respective positive inputs, and each receive a feedback signal at their respective negative inputs. The negative feedback input to amplifier 422a has feedback impedances 423a comprising impedance elements Z1 and Z2, while amplifier 422b has feedback impedances 423b comprising impedance elements Z′1 and Z′2, also as depicted in FIG. 2. In some aspects, feedback impedance elements Z1, Z2, Z′1, and Z′2 may all be resistors.


Alternatively, feedback impedance elements Z1, Z2, Z′1, and Z′2 may comprise one or more impedance elements including, for example, one or more resistors, capacitors, or combination thereof. In generally, these impedance elements will be taken as resistors unless otherwise explicitly disclosed. It may be recognized that feedback impedance element Z2 of regulated linear voltage source 402a may have the same impedance value as feedback impedance element Z′2 of regulated linear voltage source 402b. Further, feedback impedance element Z1 of regulated linear voltage source 402a may have the same impedance value as feedback impedance element Z′1 of regulated linear voltage source 402b. However, it may be recognized that equivalent impedance elements Z1 and Z′1, and Z2 and Z′2 may differ in their respective impedance values.


The total current sourced to the load, Iout, is the sum of the current supplied by regulated linear voltage source 402a and regulated linear voltage source 402b. The output current from each regulated linear voltage source may be determined by relative values of the balancing resistors, Rbal0 and Rbal1.


As depicted in FIG. 2, the feedback from the output transistor 210 to the amplifier 222 is taken downstream of sensing resistor, Rloss. This feedback provides sufficient control for the single regulated linear voltage source 202. However, the current-balanced linear voltage source configuration depicted in FIG. 4 requires feedback to each of the regulated linear voltage sources 402a,b that mutually balance the output current of each regulated linear voltage source. The feedback from the output of the output transistors, 410a,b to the respective amplifiers 422a,b, may be mediated by a differential amplifier 426. In this manner, the respective feedback voltages to amplifiers 422a and 422b are dependent on the difference between the output voltages of linear voltage source 400a and linear voltage source 400b. Thus, the positive input of the differential amplifier 426 is electrically coupled to the output of the first linear voltage source 402a and the negative differential input of the differential amplifier 426 is electrically coupled to the output of the second linear voltage source 402b. The positive differential output of the differential amplifier 426 may be operable to provide the first feedback voltage to the first regulated linear voltage source 402a at amplifier 422a and the negative differential output of the differential amplifier 426 may be operable to provide the second feedback voltage of the second regulated linear voltage source 402b at amplifier 422b.



FIG. 5 illustrates a small signal analysis of the current-balanced linear voltage source depicted in FIG. 4. For the purpose of this analysis, it may be understood that the current-balanced linear voltage source comprises a symmetric pair of regulated linear voltage sources. Accordingly, when the positive branch at ΔVou increases, the negative feedback of this branch, corresponding to regulated linear voltage source 402a in FIG. 4, counters it. Similarly, when the negative branch at ΔVou increases, the negative feedback of this branch, corresponding to regulated linear voltage source 402b in FIG. 4, counters it as well. Thus, for each branch of the differential amplifier 526:

ΔVo1=Ad*ΔVin1   Eq. (2)
−ΔVo2=Ad*(−ΔVin2)   Eq. (3)
ΔVou=Vou1−Vou2=ΔVin1−(−ΔVin2)   Eq. (4)
ΔV0=ΔVo1−(−ΔVo2)=Ad*ΔVou   Eq. (5)

where Ad is the gain of differential amplifier 526. Additionally, ΔVin1 is the positive input to differential amplifier 526 (compared to ground), −ΔVin2 is the negative input to differential amplifier 526 (compared to ground), ΔVo1 is the positive output from differential amplifier 526 (compared to ground), and −ΔVo2 is the negative output from differential amplifier 526 (compared to ground).


For the “positive” regulated branch, corresponding to regulated linear voltage source 402a in FIG. 4, from Eq. (1), above,










Δ


V

i

n

1



=



V
dac




G

(
s
)


1
+


G

(
s
)

*
Ad




=

V

o

u

1







Eq
.


(
6
)









and from Eq. 2,

ΔVo1=Ad*ΔVin1

The summer 523 of the positive branch combines the feedback voltage, ΔVo1=Vƒb with the control voltage Vdac similar to summer 323 as depicted in FIG. 3. The output voltage of the summer 523 is Vx, also as discussed with respect to summer 323 of FIG. 3. Similarly, as discussed above with respect to FIG. 3, the open loop gain, G(s), is defined as







G

(
s
)

=



Z
2


Z
1


*


R

s

e

t




R
x

+

R

s

e

t









Similarly, for the “negative” regulated branch, corresponding to regulated linear voltage source 402b in FIG. 4,











-
Δ



V

i

n

2



=



V
dac





G


(
s
)


1
+



G


(
s
)

*
Ad




=

-

V

o

u

2








Eq
.


(
7
)









In which the open loop gain G′(s) may similarly be defined as








G


(
s
)

=



Z
2



Z
1



*


R

s

e

t





R
x


+

R

s

e

t











It may be understood that G′(s) may equal G(s), and that the equivalent component, Z2 and Z′2, Z1 and Z′1, Rset and R′set, and Rx, and R′x, may have the same values. Alternatively, G′(s) may not equal G(s), and the equivalent component, Z2 and Z′2, Z1 and Z′1, Rset and R′set, and Rx, and R′x, may not have the same values.


From Eq. (3), it may be understood

−ΔVo2=Ad*(−ΔVin2)

In which the inverted input results in an inverted output of the differential amplifier 526. For current balancing between the two branches, Iou1 should equal Iou2. Thus, for







I

o

u

1


=



V

o

u

1


-

V

o

u

t




R

o

u

1








and








I

o

u

2


=



V

ou

2


-

V

o

u

t




R

ou

2




,





then Iou1−Iou2=Vou1−Vou2=0, for Rou1=Rou2.


Therefore, from Eq. (6) and Eq. (7)











V

ou

1


-

V

ou

2



=




V
dac




G

(
s
)


1
+


G

(
s
)

*
Ad




+


V
dac





G


(
s
)


1
+


G



(
s
)


*
Ad





=

2
*

V
dac




G

(
s
)


1
+


G

(
s
)

*
Ad









Eq
.


(
8
)









if G(s)=G′(s). If the equivalent component of G(s) and G′(s)—Z2 and Z′2, Z1 and Z′1, Rset and R′set, and Rx, and R′x,—have the same values, then











V

ou

1


-

V

ou

2



=

2
*

V
dac






z
2


z
1


*


R
set



R
x

+

R
set





1
+



z
2


z
1


*


R
set



R
x

+

R
set



*
Ad








Equ
.


(
9
)








As noted above for the current balancing, it is desirable to have Iou1=Iou2. Thus,







I

ou

1


=





V

ou

1


-

V
out



R

ou

1





and



I

ou

2



=



V

ou

2


-

V
out



R

ou

2









For ΔI=Iou1−Iou2,







Δ

I

=




V

ou

1


-

V
out



R

ou

1



-



V

ou

2


-

V
out



R

ou

2









The variability in ΔI due to the resistors, is thus







d

(

Δ

I

)

=



-



V

ou

1


-

V
out



R

ou

1

2



*

d

(

R

ou

1


)


+




V

ou

2


-

V
out



R

ou

2

2


*

d

(

R

ou

2


)








which reduces to







d

(

Δ

I

)

=



-

I

ou

1



*


d

(

R

ou

1


)


R

ou

1




+


I

ou

2





d

(

R

ou

2


)


R

ou

2










We may consider that the tolerances of resistors Rou1 and Rou2 are primarily due to manufacturing variables, which are independent of the individual resistor. Therefore, we can take








d

(

R

ou

1


)


R

ou

1



=


d

(

R

ou

2


)


R

ou

2








and therefore







d

(

Δ

I

)

=



d

(

R

ou

1


)


R

ou

1



*

(

Δ

I

)







which leads to








d

(

Δ

I

)


Δ

I


=


d

(

R

ou

1


)


R

ou

1








This implies that the variability in the balance of the output currents of the two branches of the current-balanced linear voltage source is equivalent to the tolerance or variability in the output resistors. As a non-limiting example, if the output resistors have a tolerance of about 1%, then the variability in the balancing of the output current between the two branches will also be about 1%.


It may be recognized that the stability of the control loop depends on the location of the poles and zeroes of the regulators and the feedback Z2/Z1. In general, it is desired to set Ad (the differential amplifier gain) close to 1. For the case of a dominant pole in the regulator's dynamic then:







A

(
s
)

=

A

1
+

s

ω

p








where A(s) is the regulator gain and ωp is the dominant pole. In general, for a feedback loop








V
o


V
i


=



A

(
s
)


1
+

A

(
s
)



=


1

1
+

(


1
A

+

s

A
*

ω

p




)





1

1
+

s

A
*

ω

p












In this case, the feedback loop dominant pole will be A·ωp.



FIG. 6 depicts graphs of simulations of the circuit depicted in FIG. 4. To create the imbalance between the two regulators, Rset was not equal to R′set. Therefore, without a feedback loop Vou1 would differ from Vou2. The feedback loop corrects the voltages at the output of each regulator and balances the current to the load between the two. To minimize the error, Z2 and Z1 and Z′2 and Z′1, which are part of the loop filters, were configured as integrators. In the example above the load current is a current source of 4A. Rbal0 and Rbal1 were set at 10 mohm each. They represent the balance resistors and the path losses.


The circuit may include two regulators connected in parallel as depicted in FIG. 4. In the bottom graph, the control voltage Vdac is varied in order to determine the changes in the other output voltage and current values under change. Thus, Vdac initiates (630a) at 0.8V, and increases (630b) to a stable (630c) 1.0V. Vdac then decreases (630d) back to a stable 0.8V. Vdac then decreases (630e) down to a stable (630f) 0.6V. Vdac controls the regulators to nominal 0.8V +/−25%. The simulations show that Vout follows the control voltage, Vdac, with a small offset of about 3 mV. V(vou1) and V(vou2) are the voltages at the output of each regulator, corresponding to Vou1 and Vou2 in FIG. 4. They are almost identical, and in this plot, they laid one on top of the other due to the resolution (scaling) of the plot. Their voltages are about 1.016V when Vdac is set to 0.8V. The difference between V(vou1)/V(vou2) and Vout is due to the voltage drop across the respective balance resistors Rbal0 and Rbal1. In these simulations, Rbal0 and Rbal1 were set to 10 mohm. With 2A from each regulator, the voltage drop on each resistor is about 20 mV, which matches the difference between the outputs of the regulators V(vou1) and V(vou2), and the voltage at the load, Vout. Iout is a current source of 4A. The current through Rbal0—I(Rbal0), also Iou1 in FIG. 5—maintains a steady state at 2A. Similarly, the current through Rbal1—I(Rbal1), also Iou2 in FIG. 5—also maintains a steady state at 2A. During the transitions of Vdac (see 630b, 630d, and 630e) lout changes by no more than 1 mA.


In the top plot, I(Rbal0)−I(Rbal1) is the difference between the output currents of the two regulators. It can be seen, under steady state conditions (see 630a, 630c, and 63f), that the difference in the output currents of the two regulators is only a few micro-amps. During the transitions of Vdac (see 630b, 630d, and 630e), it may reach +/−1.28 mA, depending on the negative or positive slope of the Vdac transition. This implies that the current balancing of the two regulators is maintained tightly during the transitions and returns to a well-balanced state when the control voltage stabilizes. Similarly, the difference in output voltages of the regulators—V(vou1)−V(vou2) differ by less than 1 μV when control voltage Vdac is in a steady-state condition. During the transition in Vdac, V(vou1)−V(vou2) may be about +/−12.85 mV depending on the slope of the Vdac transition.


In summary, the simulations show that current balancing was achieved. Without the feedback loop, when the control voltage (at the resistors Rx and R′x) of the two regulators was set to the same value, one regulator drew almost 4A, while the second regulator drew only few milliamps. This emphasizes the importance of the current balancing.


It may be understood that more than two regulated linear voltage sources can be combined in parallel to form a high current, low noise current-balanced linear voltage source. In such cases, the overall feedback feature may be effected by a control circuit receiving the outputs of each of the regulated linear voltage sources, and sourcing the required feedback voltage to each of the regulated linear voltage sources in turn. FIG. 7 illustrates one form of a current-balanced linear voltage source composed of multiple regulated linear voltage sources.


The current-balanced linear voltage source depicted in FIG. 7 is composed of multiple regulated linear voltage sources. Each regulated linear voltage source may have the components and topology as depicted in FIG. 2 (specifically, reference 202). Each of these regulated linear voltage sources may be characterized by an open loop gain G(s)x, and sourcing an output current Ioux through an output resistor Roux. Thus, for n regulated linear voltage sources, there may be n open loop gains (from G(s)1 through G(s)n), n individual output currents (Iou1 through Ioun), through n individual output resistors (Rou1 through Roun) resulting in n individual output voltages Vou1 through Voun. The n individual output currents (Iou1 through Ioun) are summed together to a total output current, Iout. The total output voltage, Vout, is dependent on the output load resistance RL.


Thus, in general, a current-balanced linear voltage source may be composed of multiple linear voltage sources, in which each linear voltage source has an input and an output, and an amplifier (623a through 623n) operable to receive a control voltage Vdac at a positive input and a feedback voltage Vfba through Vfbn at a negative input. The output of each the amplifiers Vx1 through Vxn may be electrically coupled to the input of the linear voltage source, the outputs of each of the linear voltage sources may be mutually electrically coupled and operable to supply a current to an electrical load. There is also a control circuit 640 composed of a plurality of control inputs Vi1 through Vin, in which each of the control inputs is electrically coupled to one of the linear voltage source outputs. Thus, for example, control input Vi1 may be coupled to voltage source output Vou1, Vi2 may be coupled to voltage source output Vou2, through Vin which may be coupled to voltage source output Voun. Control circuit 640 may also include an additional input to receive the voltage Vout. Additionally, the control circuit 640 may include a plurality of control outputs, ΔVo1 through ΔVon, in which each of the control outputs provides a feedback voltage—Vfb1 through Vfbn, respectively—electrically coupled to one of the negative inputs of the regulated linear voltage sources. Thus, as an example, output voltage ΔVo1 may source feedback voltage Vfb1 to amplifier 623a, output voltage ΔVo2 may source feedback voltage Vfb2 to amplifier 623b, through output voltage ΔVon which may source feedback voltage Vfbn, to amplifier 623n.


It may be recognized that the total output current Iout is the sum of the currents sourced by each of the n multiple linear voltage sources, or







I
out

=




x
=
1

n


I
oux







For proper current balancing, all n of the Ioux should be equal. Thus








I

ou

1


=





V

ou

1


-

V
out



R

ou

1



=


I

ou

2


=




V

ou

2


-

V
out



R

ou

2




=


=


I
oun

=



V

ou

n


-

V
out



R

ou

n










;





It may be recognized that Vout is the voltage that is developed by the current Iout sourced through the load resistance RL. If all n of the Ioux are equal, then each Ioux equals Iout/n. If all output resistors, Roux, have the same value (Rou) then








I
out

n

=


1

R
ou




(




V

ou

1


+

V

ou

2


+

+

V
oun


n

-

V
out


)







Therefore, for each linear voltage source i,








V
oui

-

V
out


=




V

ou

1


+

V

ou

2


+

+

V
oun


n

-

V
out






As disclosed above, control circuit 640 may receive n voltage inputs Vi1 through Vin one voltage input from the output of each of the multiple regulated linear voltage sources, as well as an input from the Vout voltage. The n+1 voltage inputs may be coupled to an n+1−input analogue-to-digital converter (ADC). The n+1−input ADC may be configured to digitize the analog voltage input from each of the n+1 voltage inputs (Vi1 through Vin plus Vout) into n+1 digitized input signals. The n+1 digitized input signals may then be used as inputs to a calculation unit to calculate the required feedback voltages. The calculation unit may be any type of calculating unit capable of performing the required calculations.


In one non-limiting example, the calculating unit may include a digital signal processing (DSP) unit comprising a processor unit and a memory unit that may store instructions and data for use by the processor unit. Such instructions may be related to the calculations of the various values disclosed below. Such data may also be derived from various input values related to measured voltages as further disclosed below. The calculating unit may calculate a value of a feedback voltage for each of the n regulated linear voltage sources. A digital-to-analog converter (DAC) may be used to convert the digital values of the feedback voltages into the n analog feedback voltages Vfb. Additional components of the control circuit 640 may include one or more timing clocks, amplifiers, filters, and sample-and-hold components as may be required for proper functioning.


The control circuit 640 may receive each of the n output voltages, Vou1 through Voun, of the n regulated linear voltage sources. The control circuit may also receive the total output voltage, Vout, developed by the passing of the total output current Iout through the load resistance RL. The n+1 channel ADC may convert the received analog voltages into digital representations of the voltages. The DSP unit may calculate a digital value of an average voltage, Vav, from the digital representations of the output voltages of the n regulated linear voltage sources. The difference between Vav and Vout (ΔV, or system voltage difference) may be calculated as well. For each regulated linear voltage source i, the DSP unit may also calculate a linear voltage difference between Vout and the output voltage of the ith regulated linear voltage source (Voui). Each linear voltage difference may be called ΔVj. A digital representation of each feedback voltage, Vfbi or regulated linear voltage difference, may then be calculated as ΔVi−ΔV. As noted above, a well balanced linear voltage supply composed of n individual regulated linear voltage sources in parallel may be characterized as having the voltage and current output of each of the regulated linear voltage sources being essentially the same. In such a case, the outputs of all of the regulated linear voltage sources are identical and thus equal to the average voltage output. It may be understood that a regulated linear voltage source having its voltage output equal to the average voltage of the ensemble of regulated linear voltage sources should require 0V feedback.


Once the calculations for the Vfbi are made by the DSP, the digital DSP values may be transferred to an n-channel digital-to-analog converter (DAC) to convert the digital representation of the feedback voltages into analog voltages. The analog voltages may be sourced by the control circuit 640 at the analog output lines ΔVo1 through ΔVon. As indicated in FIG. 7, the output lines ΔVo1 through ΔVon may source the respective analog feedback voltages Vfb1 through Vfbn to the individual regulated linear voltage sources via there respective amplifiers 623a-n.


As disclosed above, the control circuit 640 may be composed of a control voltage generator circuit comprising several digital and/or mixed digital/analog circuits, solely analog components, or a combination of analog and digital components.


Having thus described several aspects and embodiments of the technology of this application, it is to be appreciated that various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those of ordinary skill in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the technology described in the application. It is, therefore, to be understood that the foregoing embodiments are presented by way of example only and that, within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereto, inventive embodiments may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. In addition, any combination of two or more features, systems, articles, materials, and/or methods described herein, if such features, systems, articles, materials, and/or methods are not mutually inconsistent, is included within the scope of the present disclosure.


In most embodiments, a processor may be a physical or virtual processor. In other embodiments, a virtual processor may be spread across one or more portions of one or more physical processors. In certain embodiments, one or more of the embodiments described herein may be embodied in hardware such as a Digital Signal Processor DSP. In certain embodiments, one or more of the embodiments herein may be executed on a DSP. One or more of the embodiments herein may be programmed into a DSP. In some embodiments, a DSP may have one or more processors and one or more memories. In certain embodiments, a DSP may have one or more computer readable storages. In many embodiments, a DSP may be a custom designed ASIC chip. In other embodiments, one or more of the embodiments stored on a computer readable medium may be loaded into a processor and executed.


Also, as described, some aspects may be embodied as one or more methods. The acts performed as part of the method may be ordered in any suitable way. Accordingly, embodiments may be constructed in which acts are performed in an order different than illustrated, which may include performing some acts simultaneously, even though shown as sequential acts in illustrative embodiments.


The phrase “and/or,” as used herein in the specification and in the claims, should be understood to mean “either or both” of the elements so conjoined, i.e., elements that are conjunctively present in some cases and disjunctively present in other cases.


As used herein in the specification and in the claims, the phrase “at least one,” in reference to a list of one or more elements, should be understood to mean at least one element selected from any one or more of the elements in the list of elements, but not necessarily including at least one of each and every element specifically listed within the list of elements and not excluding any combinations of elements in the list of elements. This definition also allows that elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified within the list of elements to which the phrase “at least one” refers, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified.


The terms “approximately” and “about” may be used to mean within ±20% of a target value in some embodiments, within ±10% of a target value in some embodiments, within ±5% of a target value in some embodiments, and yet within ±2% of a target value in some embodiments. The terms “approximately” and “about” may include the target value.


In the claims, as well as in the specification above, all transitional phrases such as “comprising,” “including,” “carrying,” “having,” “containing,” “involving,” “holding,” “composed of,” and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limited to. The transitional phrases “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of” shall be closed or semi-closed transitional phrases, respectively.


Where a range or list of values is provided, each intervening value between the upper and lower limits of that range or list of values is individually contemplated and is encompassed within the disclosure as if each value were specifically enumerated herein. In addition, smaller ranges between and including the upper and lower limits of a given range are contemplated and encompassed within the disclosure. The listing of exemplary values or ranges is not a disclaimer of other values or ranges between and including the upper and lower limits of a given range.


The use of headings and sections in the application is not meant to limit the disclosure; each section can apply to any aspect, embodiment, or feature of the disclosure. Only those claims which use the words “means for” are intended to be interpreted under 35 USC 112, sixth paragraph. Absent a recital of “means for” in the claims, such claims should not be construed under 35 USC 112. Limitations from the specification are not intended to be read into any claims, unless such limitations are expressly included in the claims.


Embodiments disclosed herein may be embodied as a system, method or computer program product. Accordingly, embodiments may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may all generally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “module,” or “system.” Furthermore, embodiments may take the form of a computer program product embodied in one or more computer readable medium(s) having computer readable program code embodied thereon.

Claims
  • 1. A current-balanced linear voltage source, comprising: a first regulated linear voltage source, comprising: a first linear voltage source having an input and an output; anda first amplifier operable to receive a control voltage at a first positive input and a first feedback voltage at a first negative input,wherein an output of the first amplifier is electrically coupled to the input of the first linear voltage source;a second regulated linear voltage source, comprising: a second linear voltage source having an input and an output; anda second amplifier operable to receive the control voltage at a second positive input and a second feedback voltage at a second negative input,wherein an output of the second amplifier is electrically coupled to the input of the second linear voltage source,wherein the output of the first linear voltage source is electrically coupled to the output of the second linear voltage source and operable to supply a current to an electrical load; anda differential amplifier having a positive differential input, a negative differential input, a positive differential output, and a negative differential output, wherein: the positive differential input is electrically coupled to the output of the first linear voltage source; andthe negative differential input is electrically coupled to the output of the second linear voltage source;the positive differential output is operable to provide the first feedback voltage of the first regulated linear voltage source; andthe negative differential output is operable to provide the second feedback voltage of the second regulated linear voltage source.
  • 2. The current-balanced linear voltage source of claim 1, wherein the first linear voltage source comprises: a first feedback amplifier having a positive input, a negative input, and an output; anda first output transistor,wherein the output of the first feedback amplifier is electrically coupled to a base of the first output transistor,wherein the negative input of the first feedback amplifier is electrically coupled to a current output of the first output transistor,wherein the positive input of the first feedback amplifier is electrically coupled to the output of the first amplifier, andwherein the output of the first linear voltage source comprises the current output of the first output transistor.
  • 3. The current-balanced linear voltage source of claim 2, wherein the first linear voltage source further comprises a fixed voltage source electrically coupled to the positive input of the first feedback amplifier.
  • 4. The current-balanced linear voltage source of claim 1, wherein the second linear voltage source comprises: a second feedback amplifier having a positive input, a negative input, and an output; anda second output transistor,wherein the output of the second feedback amplifier is electrically coupled to a base of the second output transistor,wherein the negative input of the second feedback amplifier is electrically coupled to a current output of the second output transistor,wherein the positive input of the second feedback amplifier is electrically coupled to the output of the second amplifier, andwherein the output of the second linear voltage source comprises the current output of the second output transistor.
  • 5. The current-balanced linear voltage source of claim 4, wherein the second linear voltage source further comprises a fixed voltage source electrically coupled to the positive input of the second feedback amplifier.
  • 6. The current balanced linear voltage source of claim 1, further comprising a control voltage generator circuit operable to generate the control voltage.
  • 7. The current-balanced linear voltage source of claim 6, wherein the control voltage generator circuit comprises an analog circuit.
  • 8. The current-balanced linear voltage source of claim 6, wherein the control voltage generator circuit comprises a digital circuit.
  • 9. The current-balanced linear voltage source of claim 8, wherein the digital circuit comprises a digital to analog converter.
  • 10. A current-balanced linear voltage source system, comprising: a plurality of regulated linear voltage sources, wherein each of the plurality of regulated linear voltage sources comprises: a linear voltage source having an input and an output; andan amplifier operable to receive a control voltage at a positive input and a feedback voltage at a negative input,wherein an output of the amplifier is electrically coupled to the input of the linear voltage source,wherein the outputs of the linear voltage sources comprising the plurality of regulated linear voltage sources are mutually electrically coupled and operable to supply a current to an electrical load; anda control circuit, wherein the control circuit comprises: a plurality of control inputs, wherein each of the plurality of control inputs is electrically coupled to one of the plurality of linear voltage source outputs of the plurality of regulated linear voltage source; anda plurality of control outputs, wherein each of the plurality of control outputs provides a feedback voltage and is electrically coupled to one of the negative inputs of the plurality of regulated linear voltage sources.
  • 11. The current-balanced linear voltage source system of claim 10, wherein the linear voltage source of each of the plurality of regulated linear voltage sources, comprises: a feedback amplifier having a positive input, a negative input, and an output; andan output transistor,wherein the output of the feedback amplifier is electrically coupled to a base of the output transistor,wherein the negative input of the feedback amplifier is electrically coupled to a current output of the output transistor,wherein the positive input of the feedback amplifier is electrically coupled to the output of the amplifier, andwherein the output of the linear voltage source of each of the plurality of regulated linear voltage sources comprises the current output of the output transistor of the linear voltage source.
  • 12. The current-balanced linear voltage source system of claim 11, wherein each of the linear voltage sources of the plurality of regulated linear voltage sources further comprises a fixed voltage source electrically coupled to the positive input of the feedback amplifier of the linear voltage source.
  • 13. The current-balanced linear voltage source system of claim 10, wherein the control circuit further comprises: an analog to digital converter comprising the plurality of control inputs;a digital signal processing unit operable to receive a plurality of digital signals, wherein each of the plurality of digital signals corresponds to a digital representation of a value of a voltage output of one of the plurality of linear voltage source outputs of the plurality of regulated linear voltage sources; anda digital to analog converter comprising the plurality of control outputs, wherein the digital to analog converter is operable to receive a plurality of control signals from the digital signal processing unit.
  • 14. The current-balanced linear voltage source system of claim 13, wherein the digital signal processing unit comprises a processor unit and a memory unit, wherein the memory unit is operable to store instructions that, when executed by the processor unit, cause the processor unit to: receive the plurality of digital signals;calculate an average of the plurality of digital signals;calculate a system voltage difference between the average of the plurality of digital signals and a voltage corresponding to the current to the electrical load;for each of the plurality of digital signals, calculate a linear voltage difference between the digital signal and the voltage corresponding to the current to the electrical load; andfor each of the plurality of digital signals, calculate a regulated linear voltage difference between the linear voltage difference calculated for the digital signal and the system voltage difference.
  • 15. The current-balanced linear voltage source system of claim 14, wherein each regulated linear voltage difference calculated for each of the plurality of digital signals comprises one of the plurality of control signals received by the digital to analog converter.
  • 16. The current-balanced linear voltage source system of claim 10, further comprising a control voltage generator circuit operable to generate the control voltage received by each of the amplifiers of the plurality of regulated linear voltage sources.
  • 17. The current-balanced linear voltage source system of claim 16, wherein the control voltage generator circuit comprises an analog circuit.
  • 18. The current-balanced linear voltage source system of claim 16, wherein the control voltage generator circuit comprises a digital circuit.
  • 19. The current-balanced linear voltage source system of claim 18, wherein the digital circuit comprises a digital to analog converter.
US Referenced Citations (35)
Number Name Date Kind
4100433 Duffy Jul 1978 A
5087870 Salesky Feb 1992 A
7161393 Potanin Jan 2007 B1
7276885 Tagare Oct 2007 B1
7336058 Lo Feb 2008 B1
8334662 Jin Dec 2012 B2
9209762 Mortazavi Dec 2015 B1
10110175 Abdelfattah Oct 2018 B1
10216209 Ham Feb 2019 B1
20100283535 Li Nov 2010 A1
20130027010 Groeneweg Jan 2013 A1
20130033242 Gunther Feb 2013 A1
20130077383 Huang Mar 2013 A1
20130119954 Lo May 2013 A1
20140176231 Spinella Jun 2014 A1
20160291621 Whidden Oct 2016 A1
20160299518 Iwata Oct 2016 A1
20160366733 Wang Dec 2016 A1
20170083033 Park Mar 2017 A1
20170293312 Hu Oct 2017 A1
20170329360 Burgio Nov 2017 A1
20180314285 Susanto Nov 2018 A1
20190079552 Yasusaka Mar 2019 A1
20190278313 Mills Sep 2019 A1
20190317536 Liu Oct 2019 A1
20190364625 Brower Nov 2019 A1
20190384337 Lu Dec 2019 A1
20200004281 Chao Jan 2020 A1
20200042026 Wang Feb 2020 A1
20200259474 Ippolito Aug 2020 A1
20200285259 Torrisi Sep 2020 A1
20210278867 Wang Sep 2021 A1
20220035393 Hafizi Feb 2022 A1
20220100218 Jung Mar 2022 A1
20220334604 Kim Oct 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
3113578 Jan 2017 EP