1. Technical Field of the Invention
The invention relates generally to the field of communication devices; and, more particularly, it relates to the field of delay cells that can be implemented within such communication devices.
2. Description of Related Art
Data communication systems have been under continual development for many years. In many broadband data communication system application, variable delay cells are employed. In such applications, it is oftentimes desirable to adjust timing control between various components. One such possible implementation of a delay cell is within the context of a delay locked loop (DLL). A common approach to designing a DLL is to employ a number of delay blocks. In the prior art, each of the individual delay blocks can be undesirably power consumptive. It would be desirable to have a delay block design that is more energy efficient.
For appropriate alignment and control of the various components within a communication system, it is very often desirable to ensure having some means by which the various signal therein can be adjusted to ensure proper alignment and timing. As such, there has been and continues to be a need for better and more efficient means by which delay cells may be implemented within communication systems and within various communication devices within such communication systems.
The present invention is directed to apparatus and methods of operation that are further described in the following Brief Description of the Several Views of the Drawings, the Detailed Description of the Invention, and the claims. Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention made with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Various embodiments of the invention provide for ultra high-speed logic circuitry implemented in silicon complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) process technology. A distinction is made herein between the terminology “CMOS process technology” and “CMOS logic.” CMOS process technology as used herein refers generally to a variety of well established CMOS fabrication processes that form a field-effect transistor over a silicon substrate with a gate terminal typically made of polysilicon material disposed on top of an insulating material such as silicon dioxide. CMOS logic, on the other hand, refers to the use of complementary CMOS transistors (n-channel and p-channel, implemented using NMOS (Negative-Channel Metal-Oxide Semiconductor) transistors or PMOS (Positive-Channel Metal-Oxide Semiconductor) transistors) to form various logic gates and more complex logic circuitry, wherein zero static current is dissipated. Embodiments of the invention use current-controlled mechanisms to develop a family of very fast current-controlled CMOS (C3MOS or C3MOS™) logic that can be fabricated using a variety of conventional CMOS process technologies, but that unlike conventional CMOS logic does dissipate static current. C3MOS logic or current-controlled metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) logic are used herein interchangeably.
Various C3MOS circuit techniques are described in greater detail in commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/484,856, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,424,194 B1, entitled “Current Controlled CMOS Logic Family,” by A. Hairapetian, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes as indicated above.
Other techniques have been developed to increase the gain-bandwidth product of CMOS circuitry. For example, shunt peaking is one approach that has resulted in improved gain-bandwidth product. Shunt peaking involves putting an inductor in series with the output resistor to expand the bandwidth of the circuit. Such inductive broadbanding technique combined with C3MOS circuitry is described in greater detail in commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/610,905, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,340,899 B1, entitled “Current-Controlled CMOS Circuits with Inductive Broadbanding,” by M. Green, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes as indicated above.
In commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/028,806, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,699 B2, entitled “Current-controlled CMOS wideband data amplifier circuits,” by Guangming Yin and Jun Cao, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes as indicated above, the current-controlled CMOS wideband data amplifier circuits disclosed therein having expanded bandwidth are designed to achieve such the goal of having a flat frequency response over a very wide frequency range, where maximum bandwidth expansion is achieved by using series inductor peaking with Miller capacitance cancellation technique and shunt inductor peaking in current controlled CMOS (C3MOS or Current-controlled CMOS wideband data amplifier circuits) circuits.
Assuming that the first and second differential transistors are identical, then the first and second series peaking inductors L1 and L2 have the same inductance. A first output resistor R3 has its negative end tied to the drain of the first differential transistor, and has its positive end tied to the negative end of a first shunt peaking inductor L3. A second output resistor R4 has its negative end tied to the drain of the second differential transistor, and has its positive end tied to the negative end of a second shunt peaking inductor L4. The positive ends of the first and second shunt peaking inductors L3 and L4 are tied to the positive supply voltage (shown as VCC).
Preferably, the first and second output resistors R3 and R4 have the same resistance value R, and the first and second shunt peaking inductors L3 and L4 have the same inductances. A first capacitor C1 (which may be referred to as a first Miller cancellation capacitor C1) has its positive end coupled to the drain of the second differential transistor, and has its negative end coupled to the gate of the first differential transistor. A second capacitor C2 (which may be referred to as a second Miller cancellation capacitor C2) has its positive end coupled to the drain of the first differential transistor, and has its negative end coupled to the gate of the second differential transistor. A first output signal OUTP is taken at the drain of the second differential transistor, and the second output signal OUTN is taken at the drain of the first differential transistor.
Input series inductors (L1 and L2) resonate with the capacitance at the input of the differential pair at high frequencies and thus extend the bandwidth of the amplifier. In addition, at high frequencies, the inductors (L1 and L2) act as high impedance chokes between the termination resistors (shown as two series connected 50 Ω resistors) and the capacitors and thus also improve the input reflection for the C3MOS wideband data amplifier circuit of this embodiment 100.
In the embodiment 300 of a variable delay cell implemented using a 5-tap FIR filter, a goal is to have a data stream with an equal delay (e.g., Δtn) between each of the various components of the data stream. In the embodiment 300, there are 5 components of the data stream. Typically, this delay (e.g., Δtn) is the same, and the delays of each of these delay cells 310, 320, 330, and 340 may be adjusted together.
Another possible embodiment by which a variable delay cell can be implemented is to add a variable capacitive load at the output of conventional data buffers (e.g., differential pairs). However, there is a fundamental limitation on such an approach. For those circuits whose small-signal transfer function can be approximated by a single-pole response, the bandwidth and delay are directly coupled together. For example, the 10%-90% rise/fall time in response to an input step equals to 0.35/BW (where BW is the −3 dB bandwidth of the small signal response of the circuit). The larger is the delay amount, then the smaller is the bandwidth. As a result, the minimum bandwidth requirement on the delay cell puts an upper limit of the delay amount if such a circuit is employed. On the other hand, the smaller is the delay amount, then the larger is the bandwidth the circuit needs to have, which usually means more power and larger area the delay cell needs to have if a simple single-pole buffer is employed.
For transmission rates of 10 Gbps (Giga-bits per second) or higher, CMOS data buffers generally consume a significant amount of power due to limitations of the technology. In the two-path embodiment 400 of the
The embodiment 400 mixes two types of buffers together: a slow buffer and a fast buffer. The larger delay that is required or desired in a particular application inherently incurs a lower bandwidth in the embodiment 400. The lower bandwidth in such an instance acts as a low pass filter (LPF). This LPF filtering may corrupt the signal undesirably due to the low frequency cut-off. Undesirable inter-symbol Interference (ISI) may also be introduced because of this LPF filtering. In very high speed, broadband application, such effects can significantly reduce overall performance.
Connected to the output of the wideband data buffer having expanded bandwidth (that includes the differential transistor pair M1 and M2, i.e. a wideband differential transistor pair) is a cross-coupled differential pair (that includes the differential transistor pair M3 and M4, i.e. a cross-coupled differential transistor pair) as the regenerative stage for the data. In this embodiment 500, there are therefore two very fast operating blocks [(1) wideband data buffer and (2) cross-coupled differential pair] that operate cooperatively to perform the functionality of a wideband variable delay cell that is appropriate for broadband applications.
To vary the delay, the currents of the buffer stage and the cross-coupled differential pair stage can be adjusted (e.g., using a control block 530). When all the current passes through the buffer stage and the cross-coupled differential pair stage current source is turned off, the circuit behaves just like a wideband data amplifier having expanded bandwidth as described and referenced above (i.e., the embodiment 100 of the
Since the buffer stage of the variable delay cell has very high bandwidth, the delay from input to output at this stage is very small. It is reasonable to assume the delay through the buffer stage is a relatively constant value (denoted as Tb); the delay variation of the delay cell is mostly contributed by the regenerative process of the cross-coupled differential pair stage (denoted as Tr). In the two-step approximation, the signal through the delay cell is divided into two steps. In the first step, the signal Vin is buffered by the input stage and appear at the output after a delay of T0, taking a value of Vm·Vm is equal to the current passing through the buffer stage (Ib) times the load resistance (R). In the second step, the signal Vm at the input of the cross-coupled differential pair goes through the positive feedback of the cross-coupled differential pair and gets regenerated until reaching the value of V0, after a delay of Tr. The voltage, V0, is a fixed value, determined by the total current (I0=Ib+Ir) and load resistance (V0=R·I0).
If it assumed that Ib=x·I0, then Ir=(1−x)·I0. The value of x can be changed between I and 0, where x=1 means that all the current is going through the buffer stage. At the output, which is also the input of the cross-coupled differential pair (that includes the differential transistor pair M3 and M4), after T0 of delay vm=x·I0·R. It is noted that the output voltage of a regenerative cross-coupled differential pair increases exponentially with time and is proportional to the initial voltage as indicated below.
V(t)=Vm·e(t/τ)
where τ is the characteristic time constant of the cross-coupled differential pair, which is inversely proportional to the gain of the cross-coupled differential pair. For CMOS transistors, the gain is proportional to the square root of the biasing current in the first order as indicated below.
It is evident that as the current passing through the buffer stage becomes smaller, the delay through the cross-coupled differential pair stage becomes bigger. The total delay through the delay cell is T=Tb+Tr. Thus by changing the current distribution between the buffer stage (including the differential transistor pair M1 and M2) and cross-coupled differential pair stage (including the differential transistor pair M3 and M4) (i.e., which involves changing the value of x), the amount of the delay can be readily adjusted.
This control of the two currents, Ib and Ir, and their relationship, may be performed using a control block (e.g., control block 530 in the embodiment 500 of the
As the value of x approaches 1, then the total delay a variable delay cell (e.g., the embodiment 500 of the
Various embodiments of the invention presented herein provide for a large amount of delay to be incurred (which is selectable and variable, as desired in any of a wide variety of applications) with a minimal amount of signal quality degradation (i.e., minimal or no ISI).
One of many advantages of this novel design is that all the bandwidth extension techniques as referenced above with respect to a wideband data amplifier circuit having expanded bandwidth can be readily applied to the variable delay cell. In the embodiment 500 of
By eliminating the double path (as depicted in the embodiment 400 of the
From the embodiment 500 of the
In summary, a fully differential current-controlled CMOS (C3MOS) integrated wideband delay cell is presented herein. At the buffer stage, bandwidth extension techniques such as shunt peaking, series inductive peaking can be readily applied to increase the range of the flat frequency response. A cross-coupled differential pair stage is added to the output of the buffer to add delay from input to output through the regenerative process of the cross-coupled differential transistor pair connected in a positive feedback configuration. The delay can be adjusted by varying the current distribution between the buffer stage and the cross-coupled differential pair stage. The integrated delay cell can then accommodate a large amount of delay while at the same time maintain a high bandwidth for the data path, without adding load to the input and without adding power consumption.
It is also noted that the methods described within the preceding figures can also be performed within any appropriate system and/or apparatus design (communication systems, communication transmitters, communication receivers, communication transceivers, and/or functionality described therein) without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
In view of the above detailed description of the invention and associated drawings, other modifications and variations will now become apparent. It should also be apparent that such other modifications and variations can be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The present U.S. Utility Patent Application claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to the following U.S. Provisional Patent Application which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety and made part of the present U.S. Utility Patent Application for all purposes: 1. U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/714,814, entitled “Current-controlled CMOS (C3MOS) fully differential integrated delay cell with variable delay and high bandwidth,”, filed Tuesday, Sep. 6, 2005 (Sep. 6, 2005), pending. The following U.S. Utility Patent Applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety and made part of the present U.S. Utility Patent Application for all purposes: 1. U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 09/484,856, entitled “Current-controlled CMOS logic family,”, filed Jan. 18, 2000 (Jan. 18, 2000), now U.S. Pat. No. 6,424,194 B1, issued Jul. 23, 2002 (Jul. 23, 2002). 2. U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 09/610,905, entitled “Current-controlled CMOS circuits with inductive broadbanding,”, filed Jul. 6, 2000 (Jul. 6, 2000), now U.S. Pat. No. 6,340,899 B1, issued Jan. 22, 2002 (Jan. 22, 2002). 3. U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 10/028,806, entitled “Current-controlled CMOS wideband data amplifier circuits,”, filed Oct. 25, 2001 (Oct. 25, 2001), now U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,699 B2, issued Sep. 23, 2003 (Sep. 23, 2003).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3569732 | Christensen | Mar 1971 | A |
4333020 | Maeder | Jun 1982 | A |
4395774 | Rapp | Jul 1983 | A |
4449248 | Leslie et al. | May 1984 | A |
4519068 | Krebs et al. | May 1985 | A |
4545023 | Mizzi | Oct 1985 | A |
4599526 | Paski | Jul 1986 | A |
4649293 | Ducourant | Mar 1987 | A |
4680787 | Marry | Jul 1987 | A |
4727309 | Vajdic et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4731796 | Masterson et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4737975 | Shafer | Apr 1988 | A |
4761822 | Maile | Aug 1988 | A |
4777657 | Gillaspie | Oct 1988 | A |
4794649 | Fujiwara | Dec 1988 | A |
4804954 | Macnak et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4806796 | Bushey et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4807282 | Kazan et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4817115 | Campo et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4850009 | Zook et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4890832 | Zomaki | Jan 1990 | A |
4894792 | Mitchell et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4916441 | Gombrich | Apr 1990 | A |
4964121 | Moore | Oct 1990 | A |
4969206 | Desrochers | Nov 1990 | A |
4970406 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4977611 | Maru | Dec 1990 | A |
4995099 | Davis | Feb 1991 | A |
5008879 | Fischer et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5025486 | Klughart | Jun 1991 | A |
5029183 | Tymes | Jul 1991 | A |
5031231 | Miyaski | Jul 1991 | A |
5033109 | Kawano et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5041740 | Smith | Aug 1991 | A |
5055659 | Hendrick et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5055660 | Bertagna et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5079452 | Lain et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5081402 | Koleda | Jan 1992 | A |
5087099 | Stolarczyk | Feb 1992 | A |
5115151 | Hull et al. | May 1992 | A |
5117501 | Childress et al. | May 1992 | A |
5119502 | Kallin et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5121408 | Cai et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5123029 | Bantz et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5128938 | Borras | Jul 1992 | A |
5134347 | Koleda | Jul 1992 | A |
5142573 | Umezawa | Aug 1992 | A |
5150361 | Wieczorek et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5152006 | Klaus | Sep 1992 | A |
5153878 | Krebs | Oct 1992 | A |
5175870 | Mabey et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5177378 | Nagasawa | Jan 1993 | A |
5179721 | Comroe et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5181200 | Harrison | Jan 1993 | A |
5196805 | Beckwith et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5216295 | Hoang | Jun 1993 | A |
5230084 | Nguyen | Jul 1993 | A |
5239662 | Danielson et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241542 | Natarajan et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241691 | Owen | Aug 1993 | A |
5247656 | Kabuo et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5249220 | Moskowitz et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5249302 | Metroka et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5265238 | Canova, Jr. et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5265270 | Stengel et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5274666 | Dowdell et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5276680 | Messenger | Jan 1994 | A |
5278831 | Mbey et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5289055 | Razavi | Feb 1994 | A |
5289469 | Tanaka | Feb 1994 | A |
5291516 | Dixon et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5293639 | Wilson et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5296849 | Ide | Mar 1994 | A |
5297144 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5301196 | Ewen et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5323392 | Ishii et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5331509 | Kikinis | Jul 1994 | A |
5345449 | Buckingham et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5349649 | Iijima | Sep 1994 | A |
5361397 | Wright | Nov 1994 | A |
5363121 | Freund | Nov 1994 | A |
5373149 | Rasmussen | Dec 1994 | A |
5373506 | Tayloe et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5390206 | Rein et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392023 | D'Avello et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5406615 | Miller, II et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5406643 | Burke et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5418837 | Johansson et al. | May 1995 | A |
5420529 | Guay et al. | May 1995 | A |
5423002 | Hart | Jun 1995 | A |
5426637 | Derby et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428636 | Meier | Jun 1995 | A |
5430845 | Rimmer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5434518 | Sinh et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5438329 | Gastouniotis et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5440560 | Rypinski | Aug 1995 | A |
5457412 | Tamba et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5459412 | Mentzer | Oct 1995 | A |
5465081 | Todd | Nov 1995 | A |
5481265 | Russell | Jan 1996 | A |
5481562 | Pearson et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5510734 | Sone | Apr 1996 | A |
5510748 | Erhart et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5521530 | Yao et al. | May 1996 | A |
5526314 | Kumar | Jun 1996 | A |
5533029 | Gardner | Jul 1996 | A |
5535373 | Oinowich | Jul 1996 | A |
5544222 | Robinson et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5548230 | Gerson et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5576644 | Pelella | Nov 1996 | A |
5579487 | Meyerson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5584048 | Wieczorek | Dec 1996 | A |
5600267 | Wong et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606268 | Van Brunt | Feb 1997 | A |
5614841 | Marbot et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5625308 | Matsumoto et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5630061 | Richter et al. | May 1997 | A |
5640356 | Gibbs | Jun 1997 | A |
5675584 | Jeong | Oct 1997 | A |
5680633 | Koenck et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5708399 | Fujii et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5724361 | Fiedler | Mar 1998 | A |
5732346 | Lazaridis et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740366 | Mahany et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5744366 | Kricka et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5767699 | Bosnyak et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5796727 | Harrison et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798658 | Werking | Aug 1998 | A |
5821809 | Boerstler et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5839051 | Grimmett et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5877642 | Takahashi | Mar 1999 | A |
5892382 | Ueda et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903176 | Westgate | May 1999 | A |
5905386 | Gerson | May 1999 | A |
5940771 | Golnick et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945847 | Ransijn | Aug 1999 | A |
5945858 | Sato | Aug 1999 | A |
5945863 | Coy | Aug 1999 | A |
5969556 | Hayakawa | Oct 1999 | A |
5994939 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002279 | Evans et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014041 | Somasekhar et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014705 | Koenck et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6028454 | Elmasry et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037841 | Tanjii et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6037842 | Bryan et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038254 | Ferraiolo et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6060951 | Inoue | May 2000 | A |
6061747 | Ducaroir et al. | May 2000 | A |
6081162 | Johnson | Jun 2000 | A |
6094074 | Chi | Jul 2000 | A |
6104214 | Ueda et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111425 | Bertin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114843 | Olah | Sep 2000 | A |
6188339 | Hasegawa | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194950 | Kibar | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6222380 | Gerowitz et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6232844 | Talaga, Jr. | May 2001 | B1 |
6255881 | Balistreri et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259312 | Murtojarvi | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259321 | Song et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265898 | Bellaouar | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6310501 | Yamashita | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320422 | Koh | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6366166 | Belot | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374311 | Mahany et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377095 | Kuo | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6414558 | Ryan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6417737 | Moloudi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424194 | Hairapetian | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429692 | Chan et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456122 | Park et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6462590 | Warwar | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6463092 | Kim | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6559693 | Tung et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6566720 | Aldrich | May 2003 | B2 |
6624699 | Yin et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6686787 | Ling | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6686788 | Kim et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6774721 | Popescu et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6864558 | Momtaz et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6909309 | Green | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911857 | Stiff | Jun 2005 | B1 |
7256646 | Eid et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20020017921 | Green | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030034843 | Fanous et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040104746 | Kim et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050015638 | Zhang | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050093628 | Chen | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110525 | Chen | May 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0685933 | Jun 1995 | EP |
1 306 970 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1420511 | May 2004 | EP |
WO 8101780 | Jun 1981 | WO |
WO 0163767 | Aug 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070052467 A1 | Mar 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60714814 | Sep 2005 | US |