Current-controlled CMOS circuits with inductive broadbanding

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7919985
  • Patent Number
    7,919,985
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, February 10, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 5, 2011
    13 years ago
Abstract
Various circuit techniques for implementing ultra high speed circuits use current-controlled CMOS (C3MOS) logic with inductive broadbanding fabricated in conventional CMOS process technology. Optimum balance between power consumption and speed for each circuit application is achieved by combining high speed C3MOS logic with inductive broadbanding/C3MOS logic with low power conventional CMOS logic. The combined C3MOS logic with inductive broadbanding/C3MOS/CMOS logic allows greater integration of circuits such as high speed transceivers used in fiber optic communication systems.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates in general to high speed logic circuitry, and in particular to current-controlled CMOS (sometimes referred to as C3MOS, C3MOS, or C3MOS™) logic circuits with inductive broadbanding.


For a number of reasons CMOS is the logic family of choice in today's VLSI devices. Due to the complementary nature of its operation, CMOS logic consumes zero static power. CMOS also readily scales with technology. These two features are highly desirable given the drastic growth in demand for low power and portable electronic devices. Further, with the computer aided design (CAD) industry's focus on developing automated design-tools for CMOS based technologies, the cost and the development time of CMOS VLSI devices has reduced significantly.


The one drawback of the CMOS logic family, however, remains its limited speed. That is, conventional CMOS logic has not achieved the highest attainable switching speeds made possible by modem sub-micron CMOS technologies. As a result of the speed limitations of conventional CMOS logic, integrated circuit applications in the Giga Hertz frequency range have had to look to alternative technologies such as ultra high speed bipolar circuits and Gallium Arsenide (GaAs). These alternative technologies, however, have drawbacks of their own that have made them more of a specialized field with limited applications as compared to silicon MOSFET that has had widespread use and support by the industry. In particular, compound semiconductors such as GaAs are more susceptible to defects that degrade device performance, and suffer from increased gate leakage current and reduced noise margins. Furthermore, attempts to reliably fabricate a high quality oxide layer using GaAs have not thus far met with success. This has made it difficult to fabricate GaAs FETs, limiting the GaAs technology to junction field-effect transistors (JFETs) or Schottky barrier metal semiconductor field-effect transistors (MESFETs). A major drawback of the bipolar technology, among others, is its higher current dissipation even for circuits that operate at lower frequencies.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to apparatus and methods of operation that are further described in the following Brief Description of the Several Views of the Drawings, the Detailed Description of the Invention, and the claims. Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention made with reference to the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of differential pair including inductive broadbanding implemented with CMOS technology;



FIG. 2(
a) is a schematic diagram of the circuit of FIG. 1 without the shunt inductor;



FIG. 2(
b) is a simplified diagram depicting the transient behavior of the circuit of FIG. 2(a);



FIG. 2(
c) is a graph depicting the difference between ideal and C3MOS step responses;



FIG. 3 is a graph depicting the step response of the circuit of FIG. 1 for four values of series inductance;



FIG. 4(
a) is a graph depicting inter-symbol interference (ISI) vs input pulse width for five values of series inductance;



FIG. 4(
b) is a graph depicting the output signal of the circuit of FIG. 1 with and without inductors;



FIG. 5 shows a block diagram for a circuit that combines C3MOS with inductive broadbanding, C3MOS, and conventional CMOS logic on a single silicon substrate to achieve optimum tradeoff between speed and power consumption;



FIG. 6(
a) is a schematic diagram of a serializer circuit utilizing features of the invention;



FIG. 6(
b) is a more detailed depiction of the 2:1 MUX depicted in FIG. 6(a);



FIG. 7 is a circuit diagram of a MUX utilizing features of the present invention;



FIG. 8 is a circuit diagram of a flip-flop utilizing features of the invention; and



FIG. 9 is a simplified block diagram of a transceiver system that utilizes the C3MOS with inductive broadbanding C3MOS/CMOS combined logic according to the present invention to facilitate interconnecting high speed fiber optic communication channels.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides ultra high-speed logic circuitry implemented in silicon complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) process technology. A distinction is made herein between the terminology “CMOS process technology” and “CMOS logic”. CMOS process technology as used herein refers generally to a variety of well established CMOS fabrication processes that form a field-effect transistor over a silicon substrate with a gate terminal typically made of polysilicon material disposed on top of an insulating material such as silicon dioxide. CMOS logic, on the other hand, refers to the use of complementary CMOS transistors (n-channel and p-channel) to form various logic gates and more complex logic circuitry, wherein zero static current is dissipated. The present invention uses current-controlled mechanisms with inductive broadbanding to develop a family of very fast current-controlled CMOS (or C3MOS™) with inductive broadbanding logic that can be fabricated using a variety of conventional CMOS process technologies, but that unlike conventional CMOS logic does dissipate static current. C3MOS with inductive broadbanding logic or current-controlled metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) logic are used herein interchangeably.


In a preferred embodiment, the basic building block of this logic family is an NMOS differential pair with series connected inductive/resistive (LR) loads.



FIG. 1 illustrates the basic C3MOS differential pair 200 with shunt inductors L, and load capacitors CL. A pair of n-channel MOSFETs 202 and 204 receive differential logic signals Vin+ and Vin− at their gate terminals, respectively. Resistive loads 206 and 207 in series with shunt inductors 208 and 209 connect the drain terminals of MOSFETs 202 and 204, respectively, to the power supply VDD. Drain terminals of MOSFETs 202 and 204 from the outputs Vout− and Vout+ of the differential pair, respectively. In a preferred embodiment, the shunt inductors 208 and 209 are spiral inductors coupled to the substrate utilizing standard techniques. Resistive loads 206 and 207 may be made up of either p-channel MOSFETs operating in their linear region, or resistors made up of, for example, polysilicon material. In a preferred embodiment, polysilicon resistors are used to implement resistive loads 206 and 207, which maximizes the speed of differential pair 200. The source terminals of n-channel MOSFETs 202 and 204 connect together at node 210. A current-source n-channel MOSFET 212 connects node 210 to ground (or negative power supply). A bias voltage VB drives the gate terminal of current-source MOSFET 212 and sets up the amount of current I that flows through differential pair 200. In response to the differential signal at Vin+ and Vin−, one of the two input n-channel MOSFETs 202 and 204 switches on while the other switches off. All of current I, thus flows in one leg of the differential pair pulling the drain terminal (Vout+ or Vout−) of the on transistor down to logic low, while the drain of the other (off) transistor is pulled up toward logic high. Shunt peaking, according to the present invention, can be selectively applied to those parts of an integrated circuit that require the bandwidth enhancement.


In FIG. 1, the input levels Vin+ and Vin− vary symmetrically in opposite directions when a digital signal is received. For example if Vin+ swung positive then Vin− would swing negative. The voltage levels at Vout− and Vout+ swing in the same direction as the respective input signal levels. For reasons described more fully below, for broadband signals including frequencies in the range of over 5 GigaHz the transient response of the circuit must be fast.



FIGS. 2(
a) and (b) respectively depict the circuit of FIG. 1 with the inductors removed, resulting in a C3MOS buffer, and a simple equivalent circuit illustrating the transient behavior of the circuit. In this case the output transient waveform is characterized by an exponential waveform with a time constant RC. This waveform is depicted in FIG. 2(c) with a label “C3MOS” and has an initial slope of I/CL. The difference between the ideal and exponential step response is also depicted in FIG. 2(c).


In the circuit of FIG. 2(a) the transient response of the output signal would be controlled by the RC time constant. It is clear from FIG. 2(c) that the presence of the load resistor significantly slows down the transient step response. Thus, when an input signal is received with a very fast rise time the current increases rapidly to charge or discharge the load capacitor. However, the transient response of the output signal is controlled by the RC time constant and can have a longer rise time than the input pulse.


Now, consider the circuit as disclosed in FIG. 1, including the inductors, as is well-known in the art an inductor resists a change in current. Thus, when the drain current changes in response to an input signal the inductor chokes off current flow through the resistor so that the capacitor discharges rapidly to generate an output signal with a small rise time.


The larger the value of series inductance, the longer the full value of the current is available to charge/discharge the load capacitances. FIG. 3 shows the step response for 4 different values of series inductance.


From FIG. 3 it is clear that higher values of inductance decrease the rise time. However, if the inductance value becomes too large, an excessive overshoot will occur. To determine the optimum value of inductance, the pulse response for a set of input pulses is observed with varying pulse widths. The graphs in FIG. 4(a) show the relative error between output and input pulse widths (referred to as intersymbol interference or ISI) for 4 values of inductance.


From the FIG. 4(a) graphs it is apparent that given the values of R and CL, the optimum indictor value is given by:

LS(opt)=(0.35)*CLR2



FIG. 4(
b) depicts the output signals for the circuit of FIG. 1 with and without the inductors. The magnitude of the time intervals between zero crossing points of the output signal provide important information for interpreting the input signal. As depicted in FIG. 4(b), the slope of the waveform zero-crossings is sharper when the inductors are included in the circuit thereby more precisely defining the time intervals between zero-crossing points and reducing inter-symbol interference.


In one embodiment of the present invention a transceiver circuit along a fiber optic channel deserializes an input data stream with a bit rate of, for example, 10 Gb/s. After processing the lower frequency deserialized data, the data is serialized before transmission back onto the fiber channel. According to the present invention, those parts of this circuitry that process the highest speed data (e.g., input to the deserializer and output of the serializer) are implemented by C3MOS circuitry with inductive broadbanding.



FIG. 5 shows a simplified block diagram illustrating this exemplary embodiment of the invention. A C3MOS with inductive broadbanding input circuit 40 receives a high frequency input signal IN and outputs a first divided down version of the signal IN/n. A C3MOS MUX 42 then receives this first divided down version and divides the received signal down by another factor of m to output a second divided down version of the signal IN/(n×m). The lower frequency signal IN/(n×m) is then processes by core circuitry 44 that is implemented in conventional CMOS logic. The low frequency signal from the core logic is then increased in frequency by the reverse process to form an output signal at the original high input frequency.



FIG. 6(
a) shows an exemplary 16:1 serializer according to the present invention. The serializer includes a 16:8 multiplexer 50 that converts the data rate to 1.25 Gb/s, followed by an 8:4 multiplexer 54 that converts the data rate to 2.5 Gb/s. The 2.5 Gb/s data is further converted to a 5 Gb/s data by a 4:2 multiplexer 56, and finally to a 10 Gb/s data by a 2:1 multiplexer 58. A flip flop 60 at the output re-times the 10 Gb/s data to generate the final output data stream.


According to this embodiment of the invention, the circuit of FIG. 6(a) may combine conventional CMOS logic used for the lower speed multiplexers and core processing circuitry, with C3MOS logic for the mid-rate multiplexers, and C3MOS logic with inductive broadbanding for the highest speed multiplexer (i.e., the 2:1 multiplexer 58) as well as the output re-timing flip flop 60.


As illustrated by the various C3MOS with inductive broadbanding logic elements described below, all of the building blocks of any logic circuitry can be constructed using the C3MOS with inductive broadbanding technique of the present invention. More complex logic circuits such as shift registers, counters, frequency dividers, etc., can be constructed in C3MOS with inductive broadbanding using the basic elements described above. As mentioned above, however, both C3MOS and C3MOS with inductive broadbanding logic does consume static power. Additionally, the fabrication of C3MOS with inductive broadbanding logic is more expensive than C3MOS or CMOS because of the need to add inductors to the IC.


The static current dissipation of C3MOS and/or C3MOS with inductive broadbanding may become a limiting factor in certain large scale circuit applications. In one embodiment, as depicted for example in FIGS. 5 and 6(a), the present invention combines C3MOS with inductive broadbanding and C3MOS logic with conventional CMOS logic to achieve an optimum balance between speed and power consumption. According to this embodiment of the present invention, an integrated circuit utilizes C3MOS with inductive broadbanding logic for the ultra high speed (e.g., 10 Gb/s) portions of the circuitry, C3MOS for very high speed parts of the circuit (e.g., 2.5-5 Gb/s) and conventional CMOS logic for the relatively lower speed sections. For example, to enable an integrated circuit to be used in ultra high speed applications, the input and output circuitry that interfaces with and processes the high speed signals is implemented using C3MOS with inductive broadbanding. The circuit also employs C3MOS to divide down the frequency of the signals being processed to a low enough frequency where conventional CMOS logic can be used. The core of the circuit, according to this embodiment, is therefore implemented by conventional CMOS logic that consumes zero static current.



FIG. 6(
b) shows an implementation of the 2:1 multiplexer 58 wherein the actual output multiplexing circuit 62 uses C3MOS with inductive broadbanding an implementation of which is shown in FIG. 7.



FIG. 7 shows an exemplary C3MOS with inductive broadbanding implementation for a 2:1 multiplexer 62. Similar to the other C3MOS logic gates, multiplexer 62 includes a differential pair for each input. The positive (left) input transistor of each differential pair is coupled to VDD through by a first resistor 206 connected in series with a first series inductor 208 and the negative (right) input transistor of each differential pair is coupled to VDD through by a second resistor 207 connected in series with a second series inductor 209. The multiplexer 62 further includes select transistors 502 and 504 inserted between the common source terminals of the differential pairs and the current source transistor 506. By asserting one of the select input signals SELA or SELB, the bias current is steered to the differential pair associated with that select transistor. Thus, signal SELA steers the bias current to the differential pair with AP and AN inputs, and signal SELB steers the bias current to the differential pair with BP and BN inputs.



FIG. 8 shows an exemplary implementation of a C3MOS flip flop with inductive broadbanding for use as the re-timing flip flop in the serializer of FIG. 5. A C3MOS master-slave flip-flop 800 according to the present invention can be made by combining two latches 802 and 804. A first latch 802 receives differential input signals D and D and generates differential output signals QI and QI. The differential output signals QI and QI are then applied to the differential inputs of a second latch 804. The differential outputs Q and Q of second latch 804 provide the outputs of flip-flop 800. The input transistors of each latch are coupled to VDD by a resistor and shunt inductor coupled in series.


It is to be understood that all C3MOS logic elements, numerous examples of which are described on the above-referenced commonly-assigned patent application can employ the inductive broadbanding technique according to the present invention.


According to one embodiment of the present invention the combined C3MOS with inductive broadbanding/C3MOS/CMOS circuit technique is employed in a transceiver of the type illustrated in FIG. 9. The exemplary transceiver of FIG. 9 is typically found along fiber optic channels in high speed telecommunication networks. The transceiver includes at its input a photo detect and driver circuit 1200 that receives the input signal from the fiber optic channel. Circuit 1200 converts fiber-optic signal to packets of data and supplies it to a clock data recovery (CDR) circuit 1202. CDR circuit 1202 recovers the clock and data signals that may be in the frequency range of about 10 GHz, or higher. Established telecommunication standards require the transceiver to perform various functions, including data monitoring and error correction. These functions are performed at a lower frequency. Thus, the transceiver uses a demultiplexer 1204, depicted in FIGS. 5 and 6, which deserializes the 10 Gb/s data stream into, for example, 16 parallel signals having a bit rate of about 622 Mb/s. An application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) 1206 then performs the monitoring and error correction functions at the lower (622 Mb/s) bit rate. A multiplexer and clock multiplication unit (CMU) 1208 converts the parallel signals back into a single bit stream at 10 Gb/s. This signal is then retransmitted back onto the fiber optic channel by a laser drive 1212. The combined C3MOS with inductive broadbanding/C3MOS/CMOS technique of the present invention allows fabrication of demultiplexer 1204, ASIC 1206 and multiplexer and CMU 1208 on a single silicon die. That is, demultiplexer 1204 and multiplexer CMU 1208 are implemented in C3MOS with inductive broadbanding/C3MOS with ASIC 1206 implemented in conventional CMOS.


In conclusion, the present invention provides various circuit techniques for implementing ultra high speed circuits using current-controlled CMOS (C3MOS) logic and C3MOS with inductive broadbanding logic fabricated in conventional CMOS process technology. In one embodiment, the present invention advantageously combines high speed C3MOS with inductive broadbanding/C3MOS with inductive broadbanding/C3MOS logic with low power conventional CMOS logic. According to this embodiment, circuits such as transceivers along fiber optic channels can be fabricated on a single chip where the ultra-high speed portions of the circuit utilize C3MOS with inductive broadbanding/C3MOS and the relatively lower speed parts of the circuit use conventional CMOS logic.


A significant improvement in speed of operation of CMOS circuitry has been achieved by a family of CMOS logic that is based on current-controlled mechanism. Current-controlled CMOS (or C3MOS) logic is described in greater detail in commonly-assigned U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 09/484,856, entitled “Current-controlled CMOS logic family,” filed Jan. 18, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,424,194 B1, issued on Jun. 23, 2002, which is hereby incorporated in its entirety for all purposes. The basic building block of the C3MOS logic family uses a pair of conventional MOSFETs that steer current between a pair of load devices in response to a difference between a pair of input signals. Thus, unlike conventional CMOS logic, C3MOS logic dissipates static current, but operates at much higher speeds.


As also described in the U.S. utility patent application that is incorporated by reference just above, there are many circuit applications in which the techniques of including one or more of various building blocks of C3MOS logic may be included. For example, certain applications wherein this technique can be advantageously employed include high speed single or multi-channel serial links in communication systems.


According to one aspect of the invention, to further enhance speed of operation of circuits implemented in CMOS technology, the present invention introduces inductive elements in the C3MOS circuits. In a specific embodiment, a spiral inductor is inserted in series with the load devices of selected C3MOS structures that process high-bandwidth data signals. The resulting series combination of inductor and resistive element (e.g., polysilicon resistors) that is in parallel with an existing capacitive load provides a high impedance at a higher bandwidth than would be possible without the presence of the inductor. Optimized values for the inductors ensure appropriate placement of the circuit's natural frequencies in the complex plane to achieve fast rise and fall times with appropriate overshoot and undershoot. The present invention combines the use of this type of shunt peaking with C3MOS circuits that process broadband bi-level (i.e., digital as opposed to analog) differential signals. The combination of these characteristics allows for improvement of the output signal's inter-symbol interference without any increase in power dissipation.


According to another aspect of the invention, a multiplexer circuit includes C3MOS with inductive broadbanding to facilitate operation at ultra-high frequencies.


According to another aspect of the invention, a flip-flop is implemented utilizing C3MOS with inductive broadbanding to operate at ultrahigh frequencies.


According to another aspect of the invention, a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) logic circuitry combines on the same silicon substrate, current-controlled MOSFET circuitry of the type described above for high speed signal processing, with conventional CMOS logic that does not dissipate static current. Examples of such combined circuitry include serializer/deserializer circuitry used in high speed serial links, high speed phase-locked loop dividers, and the like.


While the above is a complete description of the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is possible to use various alternatives, modifications and equivalents. For example, although spiral inductors and poly resistors are utilized in the preferred embodiment other techniques known to persons of skill in the art can be utilized. Therefore, the scope of the present invention should be determined not with reference to the above description but should, instead, be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with their full scope of equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus, comprising: a deserializer circuit block, implemented using current-controlled complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (C3MOS) logic with inductive broadbanding, that converts a differential input signal into a plurality of signals, wherein: the deserializer circuit block is implemented using a first n-channel metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) and a second n-channel MOSFET having their source terminals coupled, their gate terminals coupled respectively to receive the differential input signal, and their drain terminals coupled respectively to first and second output nodes; and the deserializer circuit block includes:a first impedance, having a first resistance and a first inductance, coupled between the first output node and a logic high level;a second impedance, having a second resistance and a second inductance, coupled between the second output node and the logic high level; anda current-source n-channel MOSFET coupled between the coupled source terminals of the first and second n-channel MOSFETs and a logic low level.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising: first and second capacitive loads coupled respectively to the first and second output nodes.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein: the first inductance is a first spiral inductor; andthe second inductance is a second spiral inductor.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein: the first inductance is a first active inductor implemented using at least a first transistor; andthe second inductance is a second active inductor implemented using at least a second transistor.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein: the differential input signal has a first frequency; andeach of the plurality of signals has a second frequency.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein: the second frequency is less than the first frequency.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein: the first frequency is an integer multiple of the second frequency.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising: a processing circuit block, coupled to the deserializer circuit block and implemented using conventional complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) logic wherein substantially zero static current is dissipated, that generates a plurality of processed signals.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein: the deserializer circuit block and the processing circuit block are both implemented on a single silicon die.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein: the differential input signal has a first frequency;each of the plurality of signals has a second frequency; andeach of the plurality of processed signals has the second frequency.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein: the second frequency is less than the first frequency.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein: the first frequency is an integer multiple of the second frequency.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising: at least one additional deserializer circuit block, implemented in a parallel configuration with respect to the deserializer circuit block and implemented using C3MOS logic with inductive broadbanding, that converts at least one additional differential input signal into at least one additional plurality of signals; and wherein:the deserializer circuit block and the at least one additional deserializer circuit block compose a multi-channel serial link circuit; andthe deserializer circuit block and the at least one additional deserializer circuit block are both implemented on a single silicon die.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising: at least one additional deserializer circuit block, implemented using C3MOS logic with inductive broadbanding, that converts at least one additional differential input signal into at least one additional plurality of signals; and wherein:the deserializer circuit block and the at least one additional deserializer circuit block are both implemented on a single silicon die.
  • 15. An apparatus, comprising: a serializer circuit block, implemented using current-controlled complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (C3MOS) logic with inductive broadbanding, that converts a plurality of signals into a serialized signal, wherein: the serializer circuit block is implemented using a first n-channel metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) and a second n-channel MOSFET having their source terminals coupled, their gate terminals coupled respectively to receive a differential input signal corresponding to at least one of the plurality of signals, and their drain terminals coupled respectively to first and second output nodes; and the serializer circuit block includes:a first impedance, having a first resistance and a first inductance, coupled between the first output node and a logic high level;a second impedance, having a second resistance and a second inductance, coupled between the second output node and the logic high level; anda current-source n-channel MOSFET coupled between the coupled source terminals of the first and second n-channel MOSFETs and a logic low level.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 15, further comprising: first and second capacitive loads coupled respectively to the first and second output nodes.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein: the first inductance is a first spiral inductor; andthe second inductance is a second spiral inductor.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein: the first inductance is a first active inductor implemented using at least a first transistor; andthe second inductance is a second active inductor implemented using at least a second transistor.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein: each of the plurality of signals has a first frequency; andthe serialized signal has a second frequency.
  • 20. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein: the second frequency is greater than the first frequency.
  • 21. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein: the second frequency is an integer multiple of the first frequency.
  • 22. The apparatus of claim 15, further comprising: a processing circuit block, coupled to the serializer circuit block and implemented using conventional complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) logic wherein substantially zero static current is dissipated, that generates the plurality of signals.
  • 23. The apparatus of claim 22, wherein: the serializer circuit block and the processing circuit block are both implemented on a single silicon die.
  • 24. The apparatus of claim 22, wherein: each of the plurality of signals has a first frequency; andthe serialized signal has a second frequency.
  • 25. The apparatus of claim 24, wherein: the second frequency is greater than the first frequency.
  • 26. The apparatus of claim 24, wherein: the second frequency is an integer multiple of the first frequency.
  • 27. The apparatus of claim 15, further comprising: at least one additional serializer circuit block, implemented in a parallel configuration with respect to the serializer circuit block and implemented using C3MOS logic with inductive broadbanding, that converts at least one additional plurality of signals into at least one additional serialized signal; and wherein:the serializer circuit block and the at least one additional serializer circuit block compose a multi-channel serial link circuit; andthe serializer circuit block and the at least one additional serializer circuit block are both implemented on a single silicon die.
  • 28. The apparatus of claim 15, further comprising: at least one additional serializer circuit block, implemented using C3MOS logic with inductive broadbanding, that converts at least one additional plurality of signals into at least one additional serialized signal; and wherein:the serializer circuit block and the at least one additional serializer circuit block are both implemented on a single silicon die.
  • 29. An apparatus, comprising: a deserializer circuit block, implemented using current-controlled complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (C3MOS) logic with inductive broadbanding, that converts a differential input signal into a plurality of signals, wherein: the deserializer circuit block is implemented using a first n-channel metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) and a second n-channel MOSFET having their source terminals coupled, their gate terminals coupled respectively to receive the differential input signal, and their drain terminals coupled respectively to first and second output nodes; and the deserializer circuit block includes:a first impedance, having a first resistance and a first inductance, coupled between the first output node and a logic high level;a second impedance, having a second resistance and a second inductance, coupled between the second output node and the logic high level; anda current-source n-channel MOSFET coupled between the coupled source terminals of the first and second n-channel MOSFETs and a logic low level.a processing circuit block, coupled to the deserializer circuit block and implemented using conventional complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) logic wherein substantially zero static current is dissipated, that generates a plurality of processed signals; anda serializer circuit block, implemented C3MOS logic, that converts at least a portion of the plurality of processed signals into a serialized signal.
  • 30. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein: the serializer circuit block is implemented using C3MOS logic with inductive broadbanding, wherein: the serializer circuit block is implemented using a third n-channel MOSFET and a fourth n-channel MOSFET having their source terminals coupled, their gate terminals coupled respectively to receive a differential input signal corresponding to at least one of the plurality of processed signals, and their drain terminals coupled respectively to third and fourth output nodes; and the serializer circuit block includes:a third impedance, having a third resistance and a third inductance, coupled between the third output node and the logic high level;a fourth impedance, having a fourth resistance and a fourth inductance, coupled between the fourth output node and the logic high level; andat least one additional current-source n-channel MOSFET coupled between the coupled source terminals of the third and fourth n-channel MOSFETs and the logic low level.
  • 31. The apparatus of claim 29, further comprising: first and second capacitive loads coupled respectively to the first and second output nodes.
  • 32. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein: the first inductance is a first spiral inductor; andthe second inductance is a second spiral inductor.
  • 33. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein: the first inductance is a first active inductor implemented using at least a first transistor; andthe second inductance is a second active inductor implemented using at least a second transistor.
  • 34. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein: the differential input signal has a first frequency;each of the plurality of signals has a second frequency;each of the plurality of processed signals has the second frequency; andthe serialized signal has a third frequency.
  • 35. The apparatus of claim 34, wherein: the first frequency is the third frequency.
  • 36. The apparatus of claim 34, wherein: the second frequency is less than the first frequency.
  • 37. The apparatus of claim 34, wherein: the first frequency is an integer multiple of the second frequency.
  • 38. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein: the deserializer circuit block, the processing circuit block, and the serializer circuit block are all implemented on a single silicon die.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENTS/PATENT APPLICATIONS

The present U.S. Utility patent application claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §120, as a continuation, to the following U.S. Utility patent application which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety and made part of the present U.S. Utility patent application for all purposes: 1. U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/343,322, entitled “Current-controlled CMOS circuits with inductive broadbanding,” filed Jan. 31, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,498,843 B2, issued on Mar. 3, 2009, which claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §120, as a continuation, to the following U.S. Utility Patent Application which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety and made part of the present U.S. Utility Patent Application for all purposes: 2. U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/125,455, entitled “Current-controlled CMOS circuits with inductive broadbanding,” filed May 10, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,015,722 B2, issued on Mar. 21, 2006, which claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §120, as a continuation, to the following U.S. Utility patent application which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety and made part of the present U.S. Utility patent application for all purposes: 3. U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 10/315,473, entitled “Current-controlled CMOS circuits with inductive broadbanding,” filed Dec. 9, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,909,309 B2, issued on Jun. 21, 2005, which claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §120, as a continuation, to the following U.S. Utility patent application which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety and made part of the present U.S. Utility patent application for all purposes: 4. U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 09/965,235, entitled “Current-controlled CMOS circuits with inductive broadbanding,” filed Sep. 26, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,525,571 B2, issued on Feb. 25, 2003, which claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §120, as a continuation, to the following U.S. Utility patent application which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety and made part of the present U.S. Utility patent application for all purposes: 5. U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 09/610,905, entitled “Current-controlled CMOS circuits with inductive broadbanding,” filed Jul. 6, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,340,899 B1, issued on Jan. 22, 2002, which claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to the following U.S. Provisional Patent Application which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety and made part of the present U.S. Utility patent application for all purposes: a. U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/184,703, entitled “Current-controlled CMOS circuits with inductive broadbanding,” filed Feb. 24, 2000, now expired.

US Referenced Citations (173)
Number Name Date Kind
4333020 Maeder Jun 1982 A
4395774 Rapp Jul 1983 A
4449248 Leslie et al. May 1984 A
4519068 Krebs et al. May 1985 A
4545023 Mizzi Oct 1985 A
4599526 Paski Jul 1986 A
4649293 Ducourant Mar 1987 A
4680787 Marry Jul 1987 A
4727309 Vajdic et al. Feb 1988 A
4731796 Masterton et al. Mar 1988 A
4737975 Shafer Apr 1988 A
4761822 Maile Aug 1988 A
4777657 Gillaspie Oct 1988 A
4794649 Fujiwara Dec 1988 A
4804954 Macnak et al. Feb 1989 A
4806796 Bushey et al. Feb 1989 A
4807282 Kazan et al. Feb 1989 A
4817054 Banerjee Mar 1989 A
4817115 Campo et al. Mar 1989 A
4850009 Zook et al. Jul 1989 A
4890832 Komaki Jan 1990 A
4894792 Mitchell et al. Jan 1990 A
4916441 Gombrich Apr 1990 A
4964121 Moore Oct 1990 A
4969206 Desrochers Nov 1990 A
4970406 Fitzpatrick et al. Nov 1990 A
4977611 Maru Dec 1990 A
4995099 Davis Feb 1991 A
5008879 Fischer et al. Apr 1991 A
5025486 Klughart Jun 1991 A
5029183 Tymes Jul 1991 A
5031231 Miyazaki Jul 1991 A
5033109 Kawano et al. Jul 1991 A
5041740 Smith Aug 1991 A
5055659 Hendrick et al. Oct 1991 A
5055660 Bertagna et al. Oct 1991 A
5079452 Lain et al. Jan 1992 A
5081402 Koleda Jan 1992 A
5087099 Stolarczyk Feb 1992 A
5115151 Hull et al. May 1992 A
5117501 Childress et al. May 1992 A
5119502 Kallin et al. Jun 1992 A
5121408 Cai et al. Jun 1992 A
5123029 Bantz et al. Jun 1992 A
5128938 Borras Jul 1992 A
5134347 Koleda Jul 1992 A
5142573 Umezawa Aug 1992 A
5150361 Wieczorek et al. Sep 1992 A
5152006 Klaus Sep 1992 A
5153878 Krebs Oct 1992 A
5175870 Mabey et al. Dec 1992 A
5177378 Nagasawa Jan 1993 A
5179721 Comroe et al. Jan 1993 A
5181200 Harrison Jan 1993 A
5196805 Beckwith et al. Mar 1993 A
5216295 Hoang Jun 1993 A
5230084 Nguyen Jul 1993 A
5239662 Danielson et al. Aug 1993 A
5241542 Natarajan et al. Aug 1993 A
5241691 Owen Aug 1993 A
5247656 Kabuo et al. Sep 1993 A
5249220 Moskowitz et al. Sep 1993 A
5249302 Metroka et al. Sep 1993 A
5265238 Canova, Jr. et al. Nov 1993 A
5265270 Stengel et al. Nov 1993 A
5274666 Dowdell et al. Dec 1993 A
5276680 Messenger Jan 1994 A
5278831 Mabey et al. Jan 1994 A
5289055 Razavi Feb 1994 A
5289469 Tanaka Feb 1994 A
5291516 Dixon et al. Mar 1994 A
5293639 Wilson et al. Mar 1994 A
5296849 Ide Mar 1994 A
5297144 Gilbert et al. Mar 1994 A
5301196 Ewen et al. Apr 1994 A
5319369 Majos et al. Jun 1994 A
5323392 Ishii et al. Jun 1994 A
5331509 Kikinis Jul 1994 A
5345449 Buckingham et al. Sep 1994 A
5349649 Iijima Sep 1994 A
5361397 Wright Nov 1994 A
5363121 Freund Nov 1994 A
5373149 Rasmussen Dec 1994 A
5373506 Tayloe et al. Dec 1994 A
5390206 Rein et al. Feb 1995 A
5392023 D'Avello et al. Feb 1995 A
5406615 Miller, II et al. Apr 1995 A
5406643 Burke et al. Apr 1995 A
5418837 Johansson et al. May 1995 A
5420529 Guay et al. May 1995 A
5423002 Hart Jun 1995 A
5426637 Derby et al. Jun 1995 A
5428636 Meier Jun 1995 A
5430845 Rimmer et al. Jul 1995 A
5434518 Sinh et al. Jul 1995 A
5438329 Gastouniotis et al. Aug 1995 A
5440560 Rypinski Aug 1995 A
5457412 Tamba et al. Oct 1995 A
5459412 Mentzer Oct 1995 A
5465081 Todd Nov 1995 A
5481265 Russell Jan 1996 A
5481562 Pearson et al. Jan 1996 A
5488319 Lo Jan 1996 A
5510734 Sone Apr 1996 A
5510748 Erhart et al. Apr 1996 A
5521530 Yao et al. May 1996 A
5533029 Gardner Jul 1996 A
5535373 Oinowich Jul 1996 A
5544222 Robinson et al. Aug 1996 A
5548230 Gerson et al. Aug 1996 A
5576644 Pelella Nov 1996 A
5579487 Meyerson et al. Nov 1996 A
5584048 Wieczorek Dec 1996 A
5600267 Wong et al. Feb 1997 A
5606268 Van Brunt Feb 1997 A
5625308 Matsumoto et al. Apr 1997 A
5628055 Stein May 1997 A
5630061 Richter et al. May 1997 A
5640356 Gibbs Jun 1997 A
5675584 Jeong Oct 1997 A
5680633 Koenck et al. Oct 1997 A
5724361 Fiedler Mar 1998 A
5726588 Fiedler Mar 1998 A
5726613 Hayashi et al. Mar 1998 A
5732346 Lazaridis et al. Mar 1998 A
5740366 Mahany et al. Apr 1998 A
5744366 Kricka et al. Apr 1998 A
5767699 Bosnyak et al. Jun 1998 A
5796727 Harrison et al. Aug 1998 A
5798658 Werking Aug 1998 A
5821809 Boerstler et al. Oct 1998 A
5839051 Grimmett et al. Nov 1998 A
5859669 Prentice Jan 1999 A
5877642 Takahashi Mar 1999 A
5892382 Ueda et al. Apr 1999 A
5903176 Westgate May 1999 A
5905386 Gerson May 1999 A
5936475 Tchamov et al. Aug 1999 A
5940771 Gollnick et al. Aug 1999 A
5945847 Ransijn Aug 1999 A
5945858 Sato Aug 1999 A
5945863 Coy Aug 1999 A
5969556 Hayakawa Oct 1999 A
6002279 Evans et al. Dec 1999 A
6014041 Somasekhar et al. Jan 2000 A
6014705 Koenck et al. Jan 2000 A
6028454 Elmasry et al. Feb 2000 A
6037841 Tanji et al. Mar 2000 A
6037842 Bryan et al. Mar 2000 A
6038254 Ferraiolo et al. Mar 2000 A
6061747 Ducaroir et al. May 2000 A
6081162 Johnson Jun 2000 A
6094074 Chi et al. Jul 2000 A
6104214 Ueda et al. Aug 2000 A
6111425 Bertin et al. Aug 2000 A
6114843 Olah Sep 2000 A
6188339 Hasegawa Feb 2001 B1
6194950 Kibar et al. Feb 2001 B1
6222380 Gerowitz et al. Apr 2001 B1
6232844 Talaga, Jr. May 2001 B1
6259312 Murtojarvi Jul 2001 B1
6265898 Bellaouar Jul 2001 B1
6265944 Conta Jul 2001 B1
6310501 Yamashita Oct 2001 B1
6340899 Green Jan 2002 B1
6374311 Mahany et al. Apr 2002 B1
6424194 Hairapetian Jul 2002 B1
6463092 Kim et al. Oct 2002 B1
6525571 Green Feb 2003 B2
6909309 Green Jun 2005 B2
7015722 Green Mar 2006 B2
7498843 Green Mar 2009 B2
20020017921 Green Feb 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
0685933 Dec 1995 EP
0685933 Dec 1995 EP
0685933 Dec 1995 EP
63280517 Nov 1988 JP
8101780 Jun 1981 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090140771 A1 Jun 2009 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60184703 Feb 2000 US
Continuations (5)
Number Date Country
Parent 11343322 Jan 2006 US
Child 12368934 US
Parent 11125455 May 2005 US
Child 11343322 US
Parent 10315473 Dec 2002 US
Child 11125455 US
Parent 09965235 Sep 2001 US
Child 10315473 US
Parent 09610905 Jul 2000 US
Child 09965235 US