Current-controlled CMOS logic family

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9831853
  • Patent Number
    9,831,853
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 14, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 28, 2017
    6 years ago
Abstract
Various circuit techniques for implementing ultra high speed circuits use current-controlled CMOS (C3MOS) logic fabricated in conventional CMOS process technology. An entire family of logic elements including inverter/buffers, level shifters, NAND, NOR, XOR gates, latches, flip-flops and the like are implemented using C3MOS techniques. Optimum balance between power consumption and speed for each circuit application is achieve by combining high speed C3MOS logic with low power conventional CMOS logic. The combined C3MOS/CMOS logic allows greater integration of circuits such as high speed transceivers used in fiber optic communication systems.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Technical Field of the Invention

The present invention relates in general to integrated circuitry, and in particular to complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) logic and circuits with enhanced speed characteristics.


Description of Related Art

For a number of reasons CMOS is the logic family of choice in today's VLSI devices. Due to the complementary nature of its operation, CMOS logic consumes near zero static power. CMOS also readily scales with technology. These two features are highly desirable given the drastic growth in demand for low power and portable electronic devices. Further, with the computer aided design (CAD) industry's focus on developing automated design tools for CMOS based technologies, the cost and the development time of CMOS VLSI devices has reduced significantly.


The one drawback of the CMOS logic family, however, remains its limited speed. That is, conventional CMOS logic has not achieved the highest attainable switching speeds made possible by modern sub-micron CMOS technologies. This is due to a number of reasons. Referring to FIG. 1, there is shown a conventional CMOS inverter 100—the most basic building block of CMOS logic. A p-channel transistor 102 switches between the output and the positive power supply Vcc, and an n-channel transistor 104 switches between the output and the negative power supply (or ground). The switching speed in CMOS logic is inversely proportional to the average on resistance (Ron) of the MOS transistor, and the load capacitance CL on a given node (τ=Ron×CL). The on resistance Ron is proportional to the transistor channel length L divided by the power supply voltage (i.e., Ron∝L/Vcc), while the load capacitance is given by the gate capacitance of the transistor being driven (i.e., W×L×Cox, where Cox is the gate oxide capacitance), plus the interconnect parasitic capacitance Cint. Therefore, with reduced transistor channel lengths L, the switching speed is generally increased. However, this relationship no longer holds in sub-micron technologies. As the channel length L in CMOS technology shrinks into the sub-micron range, the power supply voltage must be reduced to prevent potential damage to the transistors caused by effects such as oxide breakdown and hot-electrons. The reduction of the power supply voltage prevents the proportional lowering of Ron with the channel length L. Moreover, the load capacitance which in the past was dominated by the capacitances associated with the MOS device, is dominated by the routing or interconnect capacitance (Cint) modern sub 0.5 micron technologies. This means that the load capacitance will not be reduced in proportion with the channel length L. Thus, the RC loading which is the main source of delaying the circuit remains relatively the same as CMOS technology moves in the sub-micron range.


As a result of the speed limitations of conventional CMOS logic, integrated circuit applications in the Giga Hertz frequency range have had to look to alternative technologies such as ultra high speed bipolar circuits and Gallium Arsenide (GaAs). These alternative technologies, however, have drawbacks of their own that have made them more of a specialized field with limited applications as compared to silicon MOSFET that has had widespread use and support by the industry. In particular, compound semiconductors such as GaAs are more susceptible to defects that degrade device performance, and suffer from increased gate leakage current and reduced noise margins. Furthermore, attempts to reliably fabricate a high quality oxide layer using GaAs have not thus far met with success. This has made it difficult to fabricate GaAs FETs, limiting the GaAs technology to junction field-effect transistors (JFETs) or Schottky barrier metal semiconductor field-effect transistors (MESFETs). A major drawback of the bipolar technology, among others, is its higher current dissipation even for circuits that operate at lower frequencies.


It is therefore highly desirable to develop integrated circuit design techniques that are based on conventional silicon CMOS technology, but overcome the speed limitations of CMOS logic.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to apparatus and methods of operation that are further described in the following Brief Description of the Several Views of the Drawings, the Detailed Description of the Invention, and the claims. Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention made with reference to the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a conventional CMOS inverter;



FIG. 2 is an inverter/buffer implemented in C3MOS according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3 shows an exemplary C3MOS level shift buffer according to the present invention;



FIGS. 4A and 4B show exemplary C3MOS implementations for an AND/NAND gate and an OR/NOR gate, respectively;



FIG. 5 shows an exemplary C3MOS implementation for a 2:1 multiplexer;



FIG. 6 shows an exemplary C3MOS implementation for a two-input exclusive OR/NOR gate;



FIG. 7 is a circuit schematic showing an exemplary C3MOS clocked latch according to the present invention;



FIG. 8 is a circuit schematic for an alternate embodiment for a C3MOS flip-flop according to the present invention;



FIG. 9 shows an exemplary C3MOS implementation for a flip-flop using the C3MOS latch of FIG. 7;



FIG. 10 shows a block diagram for a circuit that combines C3MOS and conventional CMOS logic on a single silicon substrate to achieve optimum tradeoff between speed and power consumption;



FIG. 11 shows an exemplary circuit application of the C3MOS/CMOS combined logic wherein C3MOS logic is used to deserialize and serialize the signal stream while CMOS logic is used as the core signal processing logic circuitry;



FIG. 12 is a simplified block diagram of a transceiver system that utilizes the C3MOS/CMOS combined logic according to the present invention to facilitate interconnecting high speed fiber optic communication channels.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides ultra high-speed logic circuitry implemented in silicon complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) process technology. A distinction is made herein between the terminology “CMOS process technology” and “CMOS logic.” CMOS process technology as used herein refers generally to a variety of well established CMOS fabrication processes that form a field-effect transistor over a silicon substrate with a gate terminal typically made of polysilicon material disposed on top of an insulating material such as silicon dioxide. CMOS logic, on the other hand, refers to the use of complementary CMOS transistors (n-channel and p-channel) to form various logic gates and more complex logic circuitry, wherein zero static current is dissipated. The present invention uses current-controlled mechanisms to develop a family of very fast current-controlled CMOS (or C3MOS™) logic that can be fabricated using a variety of conventional CMOS process technologies, but that unlike conventional CMOS logic does dissipate static current. C3MOS logic or current-controlled metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) logic are used herein interchangeably.


In a preferred embodiment, the basic building block of this logic family is an NMOS differential pair with resistive loads. Referring to FIG. 2, there is shown one embodiment for the basic C3MOS inverter/buffer 200 according to the present invention. Inverter/buffer 200 includes a pair of n-channel MOSFETs 202 and 204 that receive differential logic signals D and D# at their gate terminals, respectively. Resistive loads 206 and 208 connect the drain terminals of MOSFETs 202 and 204, respectively, to the power supply Vcc. Drain terminals of MOSFETs 202 and 204 form the outputs OUT# and OUT of the inverter/buffer, respectively. Resistive loads 206 and 208 may be made up of either p-channel MOSFETs operating in their linear region, or resistors made up of, for example, polysilicon material. In a preferred embodiment, polysilicon resistors are used to implement resistive loads 206 and 208, which maximize the speed of inverter/buffer 200. The source terminals of n-channel MOSFETs 202 and 204 connect together at node 210. A current-source n-channel MOSFET 212 connects node 210 to ground (or negative power supply). A bias voltage VB drives the gate terminal of current-source MOSFET 212 and sets up the amount of current I that flows through inverter/buffer 200. In response to the differential signal at D and D#, one of the two input n-channel MOSFETs 202 and 204 switches on while the other switches off. All of current I, thus flows in one leg of the differential pair pulling the drain terminal (OUT or OUT#) of the on transistor down to logic low, while the drain of the other (off) transistor is pulled up by its resistive load toward logic high. At the OUT output this circuit is a buffer, while at the OUT# output the circuit acts as an inverter.


Significant speed advantages are obtained by this type of current steering logic. Unlike the conventional CMOS inverter of FIG. 1, when either one of the input MOSFETs 202 or 204 is switching on, there is no p-channel pull-up transistor that fights the n-channel. Further, circuit 200 requires a relatively small differential signal to switch its transistors. This circuit also exhibits improved noise performance as compared to the CMOS inverter of FIG. 1, since in the C3MOS inverter/buffer, transistors do not switch between the power supply and the substrate. Logic circuitry based on current-steering techniques have been known in other technologies such as bipolar, where it is called emitter-coupled logic (ECL), and GaAs where it is called source-coupled FET logic (SCFL). This technique, however, has not been seen in silicon CMOS technology for a number of reasons, among which is the fact that CMOS logic has always been viewed as one that dissipates zero static current. The C3MOS logic as proposed by the present invention, on the other hand, does dissipate static current.


The design of each C3MOS logic cell according to the present invention is optimized based on several considerations including speed, current dissipation, and voltage swing. The speed of the logic gate is determined by the resistive load and the capacitance being driven. As discussed above, the preferred embodiment according to the present invention uses polysilicon resistors to implement the load devices. P-channel MOSFETs can alternatively be used, however, they require special biasing to ensure they remain in linear region. Further, the junction capacitances of the p-channel load MOSFETs introduce undesirable parasitics. Speed requirements place a maximum limit on the value of the resistive loads. On the other hand, the various C3MOS logic cells are designed to preferably maintain a constant voltage swing (I×R). Accordingly, the values for R and I are adjusted based on the capacitive load being driven to strike the optimum trade-off between switching speed and power consumption.


The C3MOS logic family, according to the present invention, contains all the building blocks of other logic families. Examples of such building blocks include inverters, buffers, level shift buffers, N-input NOR and NAND gates, exclusive OR (XOR) gates, flip flops and latches, and the like. FIG. 3 shows an exemplary C3MOS level shift circuit 300 according to the present invention. Level shift circuit 300 includes essentially the same circuit elements as inverter/buffer 200 shown in FIG. 2, with an additional resistor Rs 302 inserted between the power supply Vcc and the load resistors. Circuit 300 operates in the same fashion as inverter/buffer 200 except that it has its power supply voltage shifted by a value equal to (I×Rs). The C3MOS logic circuitry according to the present invention employs this type of level shifter to make the necessary adjustments in the signal level depending on the circuit requirements. Examples of C3MOS circuits utilizing this type of level shifting will be described below in connection with other types of C3MOS logic elements.



FIGS. 4A and 4B show exemplary C3MOS implementations for an exemplary 2-input AND/NAND gate 400 and an exemplary 2-input OR/NOR gate 402, respectively. These gates operate based on the same current steering principal as discussed above. A logic low signal at input B of AND/NAND gate 400 brings OUT to ground via Q4 while OUT# is pulled high by its load resistor. A logic low at the A input also pulls OUT to ground via Q2 and Q3 (B=high). OUT is pulled high only when both A and B are high disconnecting any path to ground. OUT# provides the inverse of OUT. OR/NOR gate 402 operates similarly to generate OR/NOR logic at its outputs. When another set of transistors are inserted in each leg of the differential pair as is the case for gates 400 and 402, the signals driving the inserted transistors (Q3, Q4) need level shifting to ensure proper switching operation of the circuit. Thus, high speed C3MOS level shifters such as those presented in FIG. 3 can be employed to drive signals B and B#. In a preferred embodiment, since node OUT in both gates 400 and 402 must drive the additional parasitics associated transistors Q4, dummy load transistors DQL1 and DQL2 connect to node OUT# to match the loading conditions at both outputs.



FIG. 5 shows an exemplary C3MOS implementation for a 2:1 multiplexer 500. Similar to the other C3MOS logic gates, multiplexer 500 includes a differential pair for each input, but multiplexer 500 further includes select transistors 502 and 504 inserted between the common source terminals of the differential pairs and the current source transistor in a cascade structure. By asserting one of the select input signals SELA or SELB, the bias current is steered to the differential pair associated with that select transistor. Thus, signal SELA steers the bias current to the differential pair with A and A# inputs, and signal SELB steers the bias current to the differential pair with B and B# inputs. Similar to gates 400 and 402, the signals SELA and SELB driving 15 inserted transistors 502 and 504 need level shifting to ensure proper switching operation of the circuit.



FIG. 6 shows an exemplary C3MOS implementation for a two-input exclusive OR (XOR) gate 600. This implementation includes two differential pairs 602 and 606 that share the same resistive load, receive differential signals A and A# at their inputs as shown, and have their drain terminals cross-coupled at the outputs. The other differential input signals B and B# are first level shifted by circuit 606 and then applied to cascade transistors 608 and 610 that are inserted between the differential pairs and the current source transistor. The circuit as thus constructed performs the XOR function on the two input signals A and B.



FIG. 7 is a circuit schematic showing an exemplary C3MOS clocked latch 700 according to the present invention. Latch 700 includes a first differential pair 702 that receives differential inputs D and D# at the gate terminals, and a second differential pair 704 that has its gate and drain terminals cross-coupled to the outputs of OUT and OUT# first differential pair 702. Clocked transistors 706 and 708 respectively connect common-source nodes of differential pairs 702 and 704 to the current-source transistor. Complementary clock signals CK and CKB drive the gate terminals of clocked transistors 706 and 708. Similar to the other C3MOS gates that have additional transistors inserted between the differential pair and the current-source transistor, clock signals CK and CKB are level shifted by level shift circuits such as that of FIG. 3.


A C3MOS master-slave flip-flop 800 according to the present invention can be made by combining two latches 700 as shown in FIG. 8. A first latch 802 receives differential input signals D and D# and generates differential output signals QI and QI#. The differential output signals QI and QI# are then applied to the differential inputs of a second latch 804. The differential outputs Q and Q# of second latch 804 provide the outputs of flip-flop 800.


In FIG. 8, a different power supply voltage (e.g., AVDD) may be employed for a C3MOS circuit portion than may be employed for a CMOS circuit portion (e.g., Vcc as in FIG. 1). In addition, FIG. 8 shows that yet another, different power supply (e.g., AVSS) may be connected to the source terminal of a current source transistor (e.g., see the current source transistors near the bottom of FIG. 8).


Every one of the logic gates described thus far may be implemented using p channel transistors. The use of p-channel transistors provides for various alternative embodiments for C3MOS logic gates. FIG. 9 shows one example of an alternative implementation for a C3MOS clocked latch 900 that uses p-channel transistors. In this embodiment, instead of inserting the n-channel clocked transistors between the common-source nodes of the differential pairs and the current-source transistor, p channel clocked transistors 902 and 904 connect between the common-source nodes and the power supply Vcc. This implementation also requires that each differential pair have a separate current-source transistor as shown. Clocked latch 900 operates essentially the same as latch 700 shown in FIG. 7, except the implementation is not as efficient both in terms of size and speed.


As illustrated by the various C3MOS logic elements described above, all of the building blocks of any logic circuitry can be constructed using the C3MOS technique of the present invention. More complex logic circuits such as shift registers, counters, frequency dividers, etc., can be constructed in C3MOS using the basic elements described above. As mentioned above, however, C3MOS logic does consume static power. The static current dissipation of C3MOS may become a limiting factor in certain large scale circuit applications. In one embodiment, the present invention combines C3MOS logic with conventional CMOS logic to achieve an optimum balance between speed and power consumption. According to this embodiment of the present invention, an integrated circuit utilizes C3MOS logic for the ultra high speed (e.g., GHz) portions of the circuitry, and conventional CMOS logic for the relatively lower speed sections. For example, to enable an integrated circuit to be used in ultra high speed applications, the input and output circuitry that interfaces with and processes the high speed signals is implemented using C3MOS. The circuit also employs C3MOS to divide down the frequency of the signals being processed to a low enough frequency where conventional CMOS logic can be used. The core of the circuit, according to this embodiment, is therefore implemented by conventional CMOS logic that consumes zero static current. FIG. 10 shows a simplified block diagram illustrating this exemplary embodiment of the invention. A C3MOS input circuit 1000 receives a high frequency input signal IN and outputs a divided down version of the signal IN/n. The lower frequency signal IN/n is then processes by core circuitry 1002 that is implemented in conventional CMOS logic. A C3MOS output circuit 1004 then converts the processed IN/n signal back to the original frequency (or any other desired frequency) before driving it onto the output node OUT.


An example of a circuit implemented using combined CMOS/C3MOS logic according to the present invention is shown in FIG. 11. C3MOS input circuitry 1100 is a deserializer that receives a serial bit stream at a high frequency of, for example, 2 GHz. A 2 GHz input clock signal CLK is divided down to 1 GHz using a C3MOS flip-flop 1102, such as the one shown in FIG. 8, that is connected in a ÷2 feedback configuration. The 1 GHz output of flip-flop 1102 is then supplied to clock inputs of a pair of C3MOS latches 1104 and 1106. Latches 1104 and 1106, which may be of the type shown in FIG. 6, receive the 2 GHz input bit stream at their inputs and respectively sample the rising and falling edges of the input bit stream in response to the 1 GHz clock signal CLK/2. The signal CLK/2 which is applied to the B/B# inputs of each latch (the level shifted input; see FIG. 6), samples the input data preferably at its center. It is to be noted that the rise and fall times of the signal in CMOS logic is often very dependent on process variations and device matching. C3MOS logic, on the other hand, is differential in nature and therefore provides much improved margins for sampling.


Referring back to FIG. 11, block 1100 thus deserializes the input bit stream with its frequency halved to allow for the use of conventional CMOS logic to process the signals. The signals at the outputs of latches 1104 and 1106 are applied to parallel processing circuitry 1108 that are implemented in conventional CMOS logic operating at 1 GHz. The reverse is performed at the output where a serializer 1110 receives the output signals from processing circuitry 1108 and serializes them using C3MOS logic. The final output signal is a bit stream with the original 2 GHz frequency. Circuit applications wherein this technique can be advantageously employed include high speed single or multi-channel serial links in communication systems.


As apparent from the circuit shown in FIG. 11, this technique doubles the amount of the core signal processing circuitry. However, since this part of the circuit is implemented in conventional CMOS logic, current dissipation is not increased by the doubling of the circuitry. Those skilled in the art appreciate that there can be more than one level of deserializing if further reduction in operating frequency is desired. That is, the frequency of the input signal can be divided down further by 4 or 8 or more if desired. As each resulting bit stream will require its own signal processing circuitry, the amount and size of the overall circuitry increases in direct proportion to the number by which the input signal frequency is divided. For each application, therefore, there is an optimum number depending on the speed, power and area requirements.


According to one embodiment of the present invention the combined C3MOS/CMOS circuit technique as shown in FIG. 11 is employed in a transceiver of the type illustrated in FIG. 12. The exemplary transceiver of FIG. 12 is typically found along fiber optic channels in high speed telecommunication networks. The transceiver includes at its input a photo detect and driver circuit 1200 that receives the input signal from the fiber optic channel. Circuit 1200 converts fiber-optic signal to packets of data and supplies it to a clock data recovery (CDR) circuit 1202. CDR circuit 1202 recovers the clock and data signals that may be in the frequency range of about 2.5 GHz, or higher. Established telecommunication standards require the transceiver to perform various functions, including data monitoring and error correction. These functions are performed at a lower frequency. Thus, the transceiver uses a demultiplexer 1204 which deserializes the 2.5 GHz data stream into, for example, 16 parallel signals having a frequency of about 155 MHz. An application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) 1206 then performs the monitoring and error correction functions at the lower (155 MHz) frequency. A multiplexer and clock multiplication unit (CMU) 1208 converts the parallel signals back into a single bit stream at 2.5 GHz. This signal is then retransmitted back onto the fiber optic channel by a laser drive 1212. The combined C3MOS/CMOS technique of the present invention allows fabrication of demultiplexer 1204, ASIC 1206 and multiplexer and CMU 1208 on a single silicon die, as indicated by reference numeral 1210, in a similar fashion as described in connection with the circuit of FIGS. 10 and 11. That is, demultiplexer 1204 and multiplexer and CMU 1208 are implemented in C3MOS with ASIC 1206 implemented in conventional CMOS.


In conclusion, the present invention provides various circuit techniques for implementing ultra high speed circuits using current-controlled CMOS (C3MOS) logic fabricated in conventional CMOS process technology. An entire family of logic elements including inverter/buffers, level shifters, NAND, NOR, XOR gates, latches, flip-flops and the like have been developed using C3MOS according to the present invention. In one embodiment, the present invention advantageously combines high speed C3MOS logic with low power conventional CMOS logic. According to this embodiment circuits such as transceivers along fiber optic channels can be fabricated on a single chip where the ultra-high speed portions of the circuit utilize C3MOS and the relatively lower speed parts of the circuit use conventional CMOS logic. While the above is a complete description of the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is possible to use various alternatives, modifications and equivalents. Therefore, the scope of the present invention should be determined not with reference to the above description but should, instead, be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with their full scope of equivalents.


In addition, certain embodiments of the present invention provide a new family of CMOS logic that is based on current-controlled mechanism to maximize speed of operation. The current-controlled CMOS (or C3MOS™) logic family according to the present invention includes all the building blocks of any other logic family. The basic building block of the C3MOS logic family uses a pair of conventional MOSFETs that steer current between a pair of load devices in response to a difference between a pair of input signals. Thus, unlike conventional CMOS logic, C3MOS logic according to this invention dissipates static current, but operates at much higher speeds. In one embodiment, the present invention combines C3MOS logic with CMOS logic within the same integrated circuitry, where C3MOS is utilized in high speed sections and CMOS is used in the lower speed parts of the circuit.


Accordingly, in one embodiment, the present invention provides a current-controlled metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) circuit fabricated on a silicon substrate, including a clocked latch made up of first and second n-channel MOSFETs having their source terminals connected together, their gate terminals coupled to receive a pair of differential logic signals, respectively, and their drain terminals connected to a true output and a complementary output, respectively; a first clocked n-channel MOSFET having a drain terminal connected to the source terminals of the first and second n-channel MOSFETs, a gate terminal coupled to receive a first clock signal CK, and a source terminal; third and fourth n-channel MOSFETs having their source terminals connected together, their gate terminals and drain terminals respectively cross-coupled to the true output and the complementary output; a second clocked n-channel MOSFET having a drain terminal connected to the source terminals of the third and fourth n-channel MOSFETs, a gate terminal coupled to receive a second clock signal CKB, and a source terminal; first and second resistive elements respectively coupling the true output and the complementary output to a high logic level; and a current-source n-channel MOSFET connected between the source terminals of the first and second clocked n-channel MOSFETs and a logic low level.


In another embodiment, the circuit further includes a buffer/inverter made up of first and second n-channel MOSFETs having their source terminals connected together, their gate terminals respectively coupled to receive a pair of differential logic signals, and their drain terminals coupled to a high logic level via a respective pair of resistive loads; and a current-source n-channel MOSFET connected between the source terminals of the first and second n-channel MOSFETs and a low logic level, wherein, the drain terminal of the first n-channel MOSFET provides a true output of the buffer/inverter and the drain terminal of the second n-channel MOSFET provides the complementary output of the buffer/inverter.


In yet another embodiment, the present invention provides complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) logic circuitry that combines on the same silicon substrate, current-controlled MOSFET circuitry of the type described above for high speed signal processing, with conventional CMOS logic that does not dissipate static current. Examples of such combined circuitry include serializer/deserializer circuitry used in high speed serial links, high speed phase-locked loop dividers, and the like.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus comprising: an integrated circuitry, including conventional complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) logic wherein substantially zero static current being dissipated and including current-controlled complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (C3MOS) logic, configured to deserialize a serialized signal to generate a plurality of signals; and wherein:the C3MOS logic including a first metal-oxide semiconductor (MOS) transistor with a first drain, a first gate, and a first source and a second MOS transistor with a second drain, a second gate, and a second source, wherein: a current steering circuit within the C3MOS logic including the first source and the second source;the first source and the second source being coupled together and to a current source;the first drain and the second drain being coupled to a power supply; andthe first gate and the second gate configured to receive a first differential signal and the first drain and the second drain configured to output a second differential signal in accordance with deserializing the serialized signal to generate the plurality of signals.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising: a C3MOS logic circuitry, within the integrated circuitry, configured to receive the serialized signal and to generate the plurality of signals; anda CMOS logic circuitry, within the integrated circuitry, configured to receive at least one of the plurality of signals from the C3MOS logic circuitry.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising: a C3MOS logic circuitry, within the integrated circuitry, configured to receive the serialized signal and to generate the plurality of signals; anda first CMOS logic circuitry, within the integrated circuitry, configured to receive a first signal of the plurality of signals from the C3MOS logic circuitry; anda second CMOS logic circuitry, within the integrated circuitry, configured to receive a second signal of the plurality of signals from the C3MOS logic circuitry.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising: a first C3MOS logic circuitry, within the integrated circuitry, configured to receive the serialized signal and to generate the plurality of signals; anda CMOS logic circuitry, within the integrated circuitry, configured to process the plurality of signals to generate a plurality of processed signals; anda second C3MOS logic circuitry configured to receive the plurality of processed signals.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the CMOS logic is further configured to operate as an inverter, a buffer, a level shifter, an AND gate, a NAND gate, an OR gate, a NOR gate, an XOR gate, a latch, or a flip-flop.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein: the serialized signal has a first frequency; andeach signal of the plurality of signals has a second frequency that is different than the first frequency.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein: the serialized signal has a first frequency; andeach signal of the plurality of signals has a second frequency that is approximately one-half of the first frequency.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising: a C3MOS logic circuitry, within the integrated circuitry, coupled to a first power supply voltage; anda CMOS logic circuitry, within the integrated circuitry, coupled to a second power supply voltage that is different than the first power supply voltage.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the plurality of signals and the serialized signal being electrical signals including data compliant with a fiber channel.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the serialized signal being a differential signal.
  • 11. An apparatus comprising: an integrated circuitry, including conventional complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) logic wherein substantially zero static current being dissipated and including current-controlled complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (C3MOS) logic, configured to: receive a first serialized signal;process the first serialized signal to generate a second serialized signal; andoutput the second serialized signal; and wherein:the C3MOS logic including a first metal-oxide semiconductor (MOS) transistor with a first drain, a first gate, and a first source and a second MOS transistor with a second drain, a second gate, and a second source, wherein: a current steering circuit within the C3MOS logic including the first source and the second source;the first source and the second source being coupled together and to a current source;the first drain and the second drain being coupled to a power supply; andthe first gate and the second gate configured to receive a first differential signal and the first drain and the second drain configured to output a second differential signal in accordance with receiving the first serialized signal, processing the first serialized signal to generate the second serialized signal, or outputting the second serialized signal.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 11 further comprising: a first C3MOS logic circuitry, within the integrated circuitry, configured to process the first serialized signal to generate a plurality of signals; anda CMOS logic circuitry, within the integrated circuitry, configured to process the plurality of signals to generate a plurality of processed signals, wherein each signal of the plurality of signals and the plurality of processed signals has a first frequency; anda second C3MOS logic circuitry configured to process the plurality of processed signals to generate the second serialized signal, wherein the first serialized signal and the second serialized signal have a second frequency that is different than the first frequency.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the C3MOS logic is further configured to operate as an inverter, a buffer, a level shifter, an AND gate, a NAND gate, an OR gate, a NOR gate, an XOR gate, a latch, or a flip-flop.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 11 further comprising: a C3MOS logic circuitry, within the integrated circuitry, coupled to a first power supply voltage; anda CMOS logic circuitry, within the integrated circuitry, coupled to a second power supply voltage that is different than the first power supply voltage.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the first serialized signal of the second serialized signal being an electrical signal including data compliant with a fiber channel.
  • 16. An apparatus comprising: an integrated circuitry, including conventional complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) logic wherein substantially zero static current being dissipated and including current-controlled complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (C3MOS) logic, configured to process a first signal using at least one processing operation to generate a second signal, wherein the at least one processing operation corresponds to an inverter, a buffer, a level shifter, an AND gate, a NAND gate, an OR gate, a NOR gate, an XOR gate, a latch, or a flip-flop; and wherein: the C3MOS logic including a first metal-oxide semiconductor (MOS) transistor with a first drain, a first gate, and a first source and a second MOS transistor with a second drain, a second gate, and a second source, wherein: a current steering circuit within the C3MOS logic including the first source and the second source;the first source and the second source being coupled together and to a current source;the first drain and the second drain being coupled to a power supply; andthe first gate and the second gate configured to receive a first differential signal and the first drain and the second drain configured to output a second differential signal in accordance with processing the first signal using at least one processing operation to generate the second signal.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 16 further comprising: a C3MOS logic circuitry, within the integrated circuitry, configured to receive the first signal and to generate another signal; anda CMOS logic circuitry, within the integrated circuitry, configured to process the another signal to generate the second signal.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein at least one of the first signal or the second signal including data compliant with a fiber channel.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 16 further comprising: a C3MOS logic circuitry, within the integrated circuitry, coupled to a first power supply voltage; anda CMOS logic circuitry, within the integrated circuitry, coupled to a second power supply voltage that is different than the first power supply voltage.
  • 20. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the first signal or the second signal being a differential signal.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENTS/PATENT APPLICATIONS

The present U.S. Utility patent application claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §120 as a continuation of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 12/784,713, entitled “Current-controlled CMOS logic family”, filed May 21, 2010, and scheduled subsequently to be issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,112,487 on Aug. 18, 2015 (as indicated in an ISSUE NOTIFICATION mailed from the USPTO on Jul. 29, 2015), which is a continuation of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 12/363,202, entitled “Current-controlled CMOS logic family,” filed Jan. 30, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,724,057 B2, issued on May 25, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/729,679, entitled “Current-controlled CMOS logic family,” filed Mar. 29, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,486,124 B2, issued on Feb. 3, 2009, which is a continuation of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/385,632, entitled “Current-controlled CMOS logic family,” filed Mar. 21, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,215,169 B2, issued on May 8, 2007, which is a continuation of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/114,969, entitled “Current-controlled CMOS logic family,” filed Apr. 26, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,038,516 B2, issued on May 2, 2006, which is a continuation of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 10/143,087, entitled “Current-controlled CMOS logic family,” filed May 9, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,900,670 B2, issued on May 31, 2005, which is a continuation of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 09/484,856, entitled “Current-controlled CMOS logic family,” filed Jan. 18, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,424,194 B1, issued on Jun. 23, 2002, which claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/141,355, entitled “Current-controlled CMOS logic family,” filed Jun. 28, 1999, all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety and made part of the present U.S. Utility patent application for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (191)
Number Name Date Kind
3569732 Christensen Mar 1971 A
4333020 Maeder Jun 1982 A
4395774 Rapp Jul 1983 A
4449248 Leslie et al. May 1984 A
4519068 Krebs et al. May 1985 A
4545023 Mizzi Oct 1985 A
4599526 Paski Jul 1986 A
4649293 Ducourant Mar 1987 A
4680787 Marry Jul 1987 A
4727309 Vajdic et al. Feb 1988 A
4731796 Masterton et al. Mar 1988 A
4737975 Shafer Apr 1988 A
4761822 Maile Aug 1988 A
4777657 Gillaspie Oct 1988 A
4794649 Fujiwara Dec 1988 A
4804954 Macnak et al. Feb 1989 A
4806796 Bushey et al. Feb 1989 A
4807282 Kazan et al. Feb 1989 A
4817054 Banerjee et al. Mar 1989 A
4817115 Campo et al. Mar 1989 A
4850009 Zook et al. Jul 1989 A
4890832 Komaki Jan 1990 A
4894792 Mitchell et al. Jan 1990 A
4897564 Chen Jan 1990 A
4916441 Gombrich Apr 1990 A
4964121 Moore Oct 1990 A
4969206 Desrochers Nov 1990 A
4970406 Fitzpatrick et al. Nov 1990 A
4977611 Maru Dec 1990 A
4995099 Davis Feb 1991 A
5008879 Fischer et al. Apr 1991 A
5025486 Klughart Jun 1991 A
5029183 Tymes Jul 1991 A
5031231 Miyazaki Jul 1991 A
5033109 Kawano et al. Jul 1991 A
5041740 Smith Aug 1991 A
5055659 Hendrick et al. Oct 1991 A
5055660 Bertagna et al. Oct 1991 A
5079452 Lain et al. Jan 1992 A
5081402 Koleda Jan 1992 A
5087099 Stolarczyk Feb 1992 A
5115151 Hull et al. May 1992 A
5117501 Childress et al. May 1992 A
5119502 Kallin et al. Jun 1992 A
5121408 Cai et al. Jun 1992 A
5123029 Bantz et al. Jun 1992 A
5128938 Borras Jul 1992 A
5134347 Koleda Jul 1992 A
5142573 Umezawa Aug 1992 A
5150361 Wieczorek et al. Sep 1992 A
5152006 Klaus Sep 1992 A
5153878 Krebs Oct 1992 A
5175870 Mabey et al. Dec 1992 A
5177378 Nagasawa Jan 1993 A
5179721 Comroe et al. Jan 1993 A
5181200 Harrison Jan 1993 A
5196805 Beckwith et al. Mar 1993 A
5216295 Hoang Jun 1993 A
5230084 Nguyen Jul 1993 A
5239662 Danielson et al. Aug 1993 A
5241542 Natarajan et al. Aug 1993 A
5241691 Owen Aug 1993 A
5247656 Kabuo et al. Sep 1993 A
5249220 Moskowitz et al. Sep 1993 A
5249302 Metroka et al. Sep 1993 A
5265238 Canova, Jr. et al. Nov 1993 A
5265270 Stengel et al. Nov 1993 A
5274666 Dowdell et al. Dec 1993 A
5276680 Messenger Jan 1994 A
5278831 Mabey et al. Jan 1994 A
5289055 Razavi Feb 1994 A
5289469 Tanaka Feb 1994 A
5291516 Dixon et al. Mar 1994 A
5293639 Wilson et al. Mar 1994 A
5296849 Ide Mar 1994 A
5297144 Gilbert et al. Mar 1994 A
5301196 Ewen et al. Apr 1994 A
5323392 Ishii et al. Jun 1994 A
5331509 Kikinis Jul 1994 A
5345449 Buckingham et al. Sep 1994 A
5349649 Iijima Sep 1994 A
5361397 Wright Nov 1994 A
5363121 Freund Nov 1994 A
5373149 Rasmussen Dec 1994 A
5373506 Tayloe et al. Dec 1994 A
5390206 Rein et al. Feb 1995 A
5392023 D'Avello et al. Feb 1995 A
5406615 Miller, II et al. Apr 1995 A
5406643 Burke et al. Apr 1995 A
5418837 Johansson et al. May 1995 A
5420529 Guay et al. May 1995 A
5423002 Hart Jun 1995 A
5426637 Derby et al. Jun 1995 A
5428636 Meier Jun 1995 A
5430845 Rimmer et al. Jul 1995 A
5434518 Sinh et al. Jul 1995 A
5438329 Gastouniotis et al. Aug 1995 A
5440560 Rypinski Aug 1995 A
5457412 Tamba et al. Oct 1995 A
5459412 Mentzer Oct 1995 A
5465081 Todd Nov 1995 A
5481265 Russell Jan 1996 A
5481562 Pearson et al. Jan 1996 A
5488319 Lo Jan 1996 A
5490282 Dreps Feb 1996 A
5510734 Sone Apr 1996 A
5510748 Erhart et al. Apr 1996 A
5521530 Yao et al. May 1996 A
5533029 Gardner Jul 1996 A
5535373 Oinowich Jul 1996 A
5544222 Robinson et al. Aug 1996 A
5548230 Gerson et al. Aug 1996 A
5576644 Pelella Nov 1996 A
5579487 Meyerson et al. Nov 1996 A
5584048 Wieczorek Dec 1996 A
5587709 Jeong Dec 1996 A
5600267 Wong et al. Feb 1997 A
5606268 Van Brunt Feb 1997 A
5614841 Marbot et al. Mar 1997 A
5625308 Matsumoto et al. Apr 1997 A
5628055 Stein May 1997 A
5630061 Richter et al. May 1997 A
5640356 Gibbs Jun 1997 A
5675584 Jeong Oct 1997 A
5680633 Koenck et al. Oct 1997 A
5708399 Fujii et al. Jan 1998 A
5724361 Fiedler Mar 1998 A
5726588 Fiedler Mar 1998 A
5732346 Lazaridis et al. Mar 1998 A
5740366 Mahany et al. Apr 1998 A
5744366 Kricka et al. Apr 1998 A
5796727 Harrison et al. Aug 1998 A
5798658 Werking Aug 1998 A
5821809 Boerstler et al. Oct 1998 A
5839051 Grimmett et al. Nov 1998 A
5859669 Prentice Jan 1999 A
5867043 Kim Feb 1999 A
5877642 Takahashi Mar 1999 A
5892382 Ueda et al. Apr 1999 A
5896135 Yang Apr 1999 A
5903176 Westgate May 1999 A
5905386 Gerson May 1999 A
5940771 Gollnick et al. Aug 1999 A
5945847 Ransijn Aug 1999 A
5945858 Sato Aug 1999 A
5945863 Coy Aug 1999 A
5969556 Hayakawa Oct 1999 A
6002279 Evans et al. Dec 1999 A
6008670 Pace Dec 1999 A
6014041 Somasekhar et al. Jan 2000 A
6014705 Koenck et al. Jan 2000 A
6028454 Elmasry et al. Feb 2000 A
6037841 Tanji et al. Mar 2000 A
6037842 Bryan et al. Mar 2000 A
6038254 Ferraiolo et al. Mar 2000 A
6061747 Ducaroir et al. May 2000 A
6081162 Johnson Jun 2000 A
6094074 Chi et al. Jul 2000 A
6104214 Ueda et al. Aug 2000 A
6108334 Blanc et al. Aug 2000 A
6111425 Bertin et al. Aug 2000 A
6114843 Olah Sep 2000 A
6121793 Pickering Sep 2000 A
6177891 Nakamura Jan 2001 B1
6188339 Hasegawa Feb 2001 B1
6194950 Kibar Feb 2001 B1
6222380 Gerowitz et al. Apr 2001 B1
6232844 Talaga, Jr. May 2001 B1
6247138 Tamura Jun 2001 B1
6259312 Murtojarvi Jul 2001 B1
6265898 Bellaouar Jul 2001 B1
6310501 Yamashita Oct 2001 B1
6374311 Mahany et al. Apr 2002 B1
6424194 Hairapetian Jul 2002 B1
6463092 Kim et al. Oct 2002 B1
6496540 Widmer Dec 2002 B1
6862296 Desai Mar 2005 B1
6897697 Yin May 2005 B2
6900670 Hairapetian May 2005 B2
6911855 Yin et al. Jun 2005 B2
6927606 Kocaman Aug 2005 B2
6982583 Yin Jan 2006 B2
7038516 Hairapetian May 2006 B2
7202706 Plasterer Apr 2007 B1
7215169 Hairapetian May 2007 B2
7486124 Hairapetian Feb 2009 B2
7724057 Hairapetian May 2010 B2
8299834 Hairapetian Oct 2012 B2
8823435 Hairapetian Sep 2014 B2
20100225355 Hairapetian Sep 2010 A1
20100237921 Hairapetian Sep 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
0685933 Dec 1995 EP
0909035 Oct 2007 EP
8101780 Jun 1981 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (85)
Entry
Atkinson, A Single Chip Radio Transceiver for DECT, IEEE 1997.
Bagby, “One Approach to Wireless Network Architecture,” IEEE P802.11191-2, Jan. 1991, pp. 1-15, 17-21.
Baumert et al., A Monolithic 50-200 MHz CMOS Clock Recovery and Retiming Circuit, IEEE 1989 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference pp. 14.5.1-14.5.4, (May 1989).
Biba, A Modest Proposal for a Asynchronous, Data Intensive, Wireless Local Area Network, IEEE P802.11191-25, Mar. 1991; pp. 1-25.
Bida, “A Hybrid Wireless MAC Protocol Supporting Asynchronous and Synchronous MSDU Delivery Services,” IEEE 802.11/91-92, Sep. 1991, pp. 1-46.
Buhanan, “CML and Flip TAB Joint Forces in the DPS 88's Micropackages,” Electronics Nov. 3, 1982.
Cheah, “A Proposed Architecture and Access Protocol Outline for the IEEE 802.11 Radio LAN Standards,” Document IEEE P802.11/91-54, May 1991; pp. 1-20.
Chen and Barker, A 1.25Gb/s, 460mW CMOS Transceiver for Serial Data Communication, 1997 IEEE International Solid-state Circuits Conference pp. 242-243, 465.
Chen and Waldron, A Single-Chip 266Mbls CMOS TransmitterlReceiver for Serial Data Communications, 1993 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 100-101, 269.
Chu et al.: “A comparison of CMOS circuit techniques: Differential cascode voltage switch logic versus conventional logic” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. SC-22(4) pp. 528-532, (Aug. 1987).
Cox, “A Radio System Proposal for Widespread Low-Power Tetherless Communications,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 39, No. 2 (Feb. 1991), pp. 324-335.
Djahanshahi et al., High-speed ECL-Compatible Serial I/0 in 0.35!m CMOS, IEEE 1998.
Dunlop et al., A 9 Gbitls Bandwidth MultiplexerfDemultiplexer CMOS Chip, 1992 Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers pp. 68-69.
Elrabaa, Multimitter BiCMOS CML Circuits, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 454-458 (Mar. 1992).
Elrabaa, Optimization of Digital BiCMOS Circuits, An Overview, IEEE 1992, 5 pages.
Ewen et al., CMOS circuits for Gbls serial data communication, IBM J. Res. Develop., vol. 39 No. 12 pp. 73-81 (Mar. 1995).
Ewen et al., Single-Chip 1062Mbaud CMOS Transceiver for Serial Data Communication, 1995 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 32-33, 336.
Fiedler et al., A 1.0625Gbps Transceiver with 2x-Oversampling and Transmit Signal Pre-Emphasis, 1997 IEEE International Solid-state Circuits Conference pp. 238-239, 464.
Friedman et al, A Baseband Processor for IS-54 Cellular Telephony, IEEE Journal of Solid-state Circuits, vol. 31 No. 5 pp. 646-655 (May 1996).
Fukaishi et al., A 4.25-Gbls CMOS Fiber Channel Transceiver with Asynchronous Tree-Type Demultiplexer and Frequency Conversion Architecture, IEEE Journal of Solid-state Circuits, vol. 33 No. 12, pp. 2139-2147 (1998).
Gray et al., “Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits,” John Wiley Sons, Inc., pp. 704-709, (1977).
Harrold, “An Introduction to GaAs IC Design,” Prentice Hall International, UK Ltd., pp. 43-45, 63, 160, (1993).
Heimschi et al; Merged CMOS/Bipolar Current Switch Logic (MCSL), IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, Oct. 1989, vol. 24, pp. 1307-1311.
Heller et al.: “Cascade voltage switch logic: A differential CMOS logic family”, IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, pp. 16-17 (Feb. 22, 1984).
Hoberecht, “A Layered network Protocol for Packet Voice and Data Integration,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. SAC-1, No. 6 (Dec. 1983), pp. 1006-1013.
Hodges et al., “Analysis and Design of Digital Integrated Circuits.” McGraw Hill, Inc., pp. 271-283, (1983).
Katsu, S. et al. “A GaAs monolithic frequency divider using source coupled FET logic,” IEEE Electron Device Letters Aug. 1982, pp. 197-199, vol. EDL-3, No. 8.
Katsu, S. et al. “A source coupled FET logic—A new current-mode approach to GaAs logics,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices Jun. 1985, pp. 1114-1118, vol. ED-32, No. 6.
Klose, “Process-Optimization for Sub-30ps BiCMOS Technologies for Mixed ECLICMOS Applications,” IEEE 1991.
Kurisu et al., 2.8Gb/s 176mW Byte-Interleaved and 3.0 Gbls 118mW Bit-Interleaved 8:1 Multiplexers, 1996 International Solid state Circuits Conference pp. 122-123, 429.
Lee et al., “A CMOS Serial Link for 1 Gbaud Fully Duplexed Data Communication,” 1994 Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 125-126.
Lee et al., A CMOS Serial Link for Fully Duplexed Data Communication, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 30, pp. 353-364 (Apr. 1995).
Lee, T.H. “High-frequency amplifier design,” Chapter 8 in the Design of CMOS Radio-Frequency Integrated Circuits. 1998, Cambridge Press, New York, N.Y., pp. 178-185.
Madhavan and Levi, Low-Power 2.5 Gbitls VCSEL driver in 0.5!m CMOS technology, Electronics Letters, vol. 34 No. 2 pp. 178-179 (Jan. 1998).
Mizuno, M. et al. “A GHz MOS adaptive pipeline technique using MOS current-mode logic,” IEEE J. of Solid-State Circuits Jun. 1996, pp. 784-791, vol. 31, No. 6.
Mudd et al, “Very High Speed ECLICMG Gate Arrays with Submicron Structures,” IEEE 1989, 5 pages.
Natarajan et al, “Battery Efficient Operation of Radio MAC Protocol,” IEEE P802.11191-102, Sep. 1991, pp. 1-5.
Navarro and Van Noije, Design of an 8:1 MUX at 1.7Gbit/s in 0.8!m CMOS Technology, 1998 Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI.
Oshima et al., “A Single CMOS SDH Terminal Chip for 622 Mbls STM 4C,” 1994 IEEE International SolidState Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 174-175.
Pederson and Metz, A CMOS to IOOK ECL Interface Circuit, 1989 IEEE International Solid-state Circuits Conference pp. 226-227, 345.
Pfennings et al. “Differential split-level CMOS logic for subnanosecond speeds,” IEEE Journal ofSolid State Circuits Oct. 1985, pp. 1050-1055, vol. SC-20, No. 5.
Quigley et al., Current Mode Transceiver Logic, (CMTL) for Reduced Swing CMOS, Chip to Chip Communication, IEEE 1993.
Robert Meier's Master's Thesis, Mobile Computer Network Architecture, May 1993, 82 pages.
Rudell, J. et al. “A 1.9-GHz wide-band IF double conversion CMOS receiver for cordless telephone applications,” IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits Dec. 1997, pp. 2071-2088, vol. 32, No. 12.
Runge and Thomas, 5Gbit/s 2:1 multiplexer fabricated in 0.35!m CMOS and 3Gbit/s 1:2 demultiplexer fabricated in 0.5!m CMOS technology, Electronics Letters, vol. 35 No. 19.pp. 163 1-163 33 (Sep. 1999).
Rypinski, “Architecture-Topology and Protocol Stacks,” IEEE 802.11191-21, Mar. 1991, 12 pages.
Rypinski, Power-Drain Considerations for Full Time and Sleep Mode Radio Receivers, IEEE P802.11/91-99, Sep. 1991, 11 pages.
Somasekhar, D′. and Kaushik, R. “Differential current switch logic a power DCVS logic family,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits Jul. 1996, pp. 981-991, vol. 31, No. 7.
Thompson et al., A 300-MHz BiCMOS Serial Data Transceiver, IEEE Journal of Solid-state Circuits, vol. 29 No. 3 pp. 185-192 (1994).
Widmer et al., “Single-Chip 4×500Mbaud CMOS Transceiver,” 1996 IEEE International SolidState Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 126-127, 430.
Widmer et al., Single-Chip 4×500-MEd CMOS Transceiver, IEEE Journal of Solid-state Circuits, vol. 31 No. 12 pp. 2004-2014 (1996).
Yamashina et al., “A Low-Supply Voltage GHz MOS Integrated Circuit for Mobile Computing Systems,” IEEE Symposium on Low Power Electronics, XP002386133, Oct. 1994, pp. 80-81.
Yamashina, M. and Yamada, H. “An MOS current mode logic (MCML) circuit for low-power sub-GHz processors,” IEICE Trans. Electron. Oct. 1992, pp. 1181-1187, vol. E75-C, No. 10.
Yamashina, M. and Yamada, H. “An MOS current mode logic (MCML) circuit for low-power sub-GHz processors,” NEC Res. Develop. Jan. 1995, pp. 54-63, vol. 36, No. 1.
Yuen et al., An ECL Gate Array with 2.5 GHz Embedded PLL, IEEE 1993.
Document label, “Feb. 4, 2011 Emulex's Invalidity Contentions”, 149 total pages.
Document label, “Feb. 4, 2011 Emulex's Invalidity Contentions, Ex. A”, 249 total pages.
Document label, “Feb. 4, 2011 Emulex's Invalidity Contentions, Ex. B”, 45 total pages.
Document label, “Feb. 4, 2011 Emulex's Invalidity Contentions, Ex. C 11”, 80 total pages.
Document label, “Feb. 4, 2011 Emulex's Invalidity Contentions, Ex. C 12”, 48 total pages.
Document label, “Feb. 4, 2011 Emulex's Invalidity Contentions, Ex. C”, 67 total pages.
Document label, “Feb. 4, 2011 Emulex's Invalidity Contentions, Ex. D 21”, 48 total pages.
Document label, “Feb. 4, 2011 Emulex's Invalidity Contentions, Ex. D”, 230 total pages.
Document label, “Feb. 4, 2011 Emulex's Invalidity Contentions, Ex. E”, 384 total pages.
Document label, “Feb. 4, 2011 Emulex's Invalidity Contentions, Ex. F”, 333 total pages.
Document label, “Feb. 4, 2011 Emulex's Invalidity Contentions, Ex. G 21”, 33 total pages.
Document label, “Feb. 4, 2011 Emulex's Invalidity Contentions, Ex. G”, 251 total pages.
Document label, “Feb. 4, 2011 Emulex's Invalidity Contentions, Razavi”, 100 total pages.
Document label, “Feb. 4, 2011 Emulex's Invalidity Contentions, Razavi, Part 2”, 82 total pages.
Document label, “Feb. 4, 2011 Emulex's Invalidity Contentions, Varma”, 9 total pages.
Document label, “Aug. 8, 2011 Broadcom Memorandum of Contentions of Fact and Law”, 26 total pages.
Document label, “Aug. 8, 2011 Emulex's Mem of Contentions of Fact and Law”, 32 total pages.
Document label, “Aug. 18, 2011 Emulex's 282 Notice”, 19 total pages.
Document label, “Oct. 4, 2011 Broadcom Memo ISO Motion for JMOL of No Invalidity”, 7 total pages.
Document label, “Oct. 5, 2011 Emulex Opp to Motion for JMOL of No Invalidity of”, 9 total pages.
Document label, “Oct. 12, 2011 Special Verdict”, 15 total pages.
Document label, “Nov. 9, 2011 Broadcom Post Trial Brief on NonObviousness of”, 21 total pages.
Document label, “Nov. 9, 2011 Broadcom Post Trial Brief on NonObviousness of 2”, 22 total pages.
Document label, “Nov. 9, 2011 Emulex's Renewed Motion for Judgement on Obviousn4”, 10 total pages.
Document label, “Nov. 9, 2011 Emulex's Renewed Motion for Judgement on Obviousn5”, 10 total pages.
Document label, “Nov. 9, 2011 Emulex's Renewed Motion for Judgement on Obviousn6”, 11 total pages.
Document label, “Nov. 9, 2011 Emulex's Renewed Motion for Judgement on Obviousn7”, 22 total pages.
Document label, “Nov. 9, 2011 Emulex's Renewed Motion for Judgement on Obviousne”, 4 total pages.
Document label, “Nov. 9, 2011 Emulex's Renewed Motion for Judgement re Obviousn4”, 29 total pages.
Document label, “Nov. 9, 2011 Emulex's Renewed Motion for Judgement re Obviousne”, 3 total pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150349769 A1 Dec 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60141355 Jun 1999 US
Continuations (7)
Number Date Country
Parent 12784713 May 2010 US
Child 14826557 US
Parent 12363202 Jan 2009 US
Child 12784713 US
Parent 11729679 Mar 2007 US
Child 12363202 US
Parent 11385632 Mar 2006 US
Child 11729679 US
Parent 11114969 Apr 2005 US
Child 11385632 US
Parent 10143087 May 2002 US
Child 11114969 US
Parent 09484856 Jan 2000 US
Child 10143087 US