1. Field of the Invention
The present invention pertains to the field of complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) circuitry; and, specifically, to the field of high speed CMOS wideband data amplifiers for wideband data communication applications.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
High speed wideband data amplifiers are used in wideband data communication applications. For a number of reasons including speed limitations of processing technology, power consumption and other cost related concerns, it is desirable to develop efficient techniques to boost the amplifier bandwidth for higher frequency operations. High speed circuit techniques such as current-controlled CMOS (or C3MOS) logic have been developed that have brought about marked increase in the speed of circuitry fabricated using standard CMOS process technology. Various C3MOS circuit techniques are described in greater detail in commonly-assigned patent application Ser. No. 09/484,856, titled “Current Controlled CMOS Logic Family,” by A. Hairapetian, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Other techniques have been developed to increase the gain-bandwidth product of CMOS circuitry. For example, shunt peaking is one approach that has resulted in improved gain-bandwidth product. Shunt peaking involves putting an inductor in series with the output resistor to expand the bandwidth of the circuit. Such inductive broadbanding technique combined with C3MOS circuitry has been described in greater detail in commonly-assigned patent application Ser. No. 09/610,905, titled “Current-Controlled CMOS Circuits with Inductive Broadbanding,” by M. Green, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The expansion of the gain-bandwidth product brought about by such inductive peaking, however, is limited to about 1.5 times, and the inductors needed are generally large which requires a large area on an integrated circuit. In wideband data communications, the usable data frequency range starts at several kilohertz and extends all the way up to many gigahertz. A wideband amplifier is required to handle such a broad spectrum of data frequencies. This is in contrast to the wireless domain where communications occurs only over a narrow band, which can be accomplished using a tuned amplifier with an inductor and a capacitor. However, a relatively constant or flat frequency response is desired over a wide frequency band in a wideband data amplifier.
Typically, in designing a wideband amplifier there is a trade off between gain and bandwidth. The product of gain and bandwidth is usually a constant for the same topology. However, by using special techniques, bandwidth can be extended while maintaining the same gain level. One conventional way is to employ a faster process technology, such as GaAs or InP when fabricating integrated circuits upon which the wideband data amplifier is implemented. However, these technologies are generally more costly and not as widely available as standard CMOS process.
As is apparent from the above discussion, a need exists for widening the high gain portion of the frequency response of the amplifier without compromising the gain, for minimizing the power consumption of the amplifier, and for eliminating expensive process requirements.
The present invention is directed to apparatus and methods of operation that are further described in the following Brief Description of the Several Views of the Drawings, the Detailed Description of the Invention, and the claims. Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention made with reference to the accompanying drawings.
This invention achieves maximum bandwidth expansion by using series inductor peaking with miller capacitance cancellation technique and shunt inductor peaking in current controlled CMOS circuit (C3MOS). The series peaking provides a certain peak bandwidth product depending on the inductance L, the capacitance C, and the quality of these two components. The bandwidth is inversely proportional to the square root of LC. The peaking mainly depends upon the inductance due to its limited Q. By reducing the miller capacitance from the C3MOS input a wider bandwidth is obtained with adequate peaking value. The total response of the amplifier can be obtained with wider bandwidth of minimum ripple and minimum phase distortion.
According to the present invention, an amplifier stage includes a current source (preferably a biased transistor), first and second differential transistors coupled to the current source, first and second series peaking inductors coupled to the gates of the first and second differential transistors, respectively, a first output resistor and a first shunt peaking inductor connected in series and coupled to the drain of the first differential transistor, and a second output resistor and a second shunt peaking inductor connected in series and coupled to the drain of the second differential transistor.
According to another aspect of the present invention, first and second miller capacitance cancellation capacitors are cross-coupled between the drains and gates of the first and second differential transistors.
According to yet another aspect of the present invention, a multi-stage differential amplifier includes serial peaking and shunt peaking in the various stages of the multi-stage differential amplifier. According to another aspect of the present invention, miller capacitance cancellation is employed in the various stages of the multi-stage differential amplifier. The serial peaking, shunt peaking, and miller capacitance cancellation can be combined in any of various combinations throughout the various stages of the multi-stage differential amplifier. In an embodiment, the serial peaking, shunt peaking, and miller capacitance cancellation are all combined in the first stage of the multi-stage differential amplifier.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the Detailed Description of the Invention and Figures.
The Figures are more fully explained in the Detailed Description of the Invention.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, shunt peaking, and serial peaking are combined in the same wideband data amplifier. In various embodiments of a multi-stage wideband data amplifier, some stages may have serial peaking but not shunt peaking, other stages may have shunt peaking but not serial peaking, other stages may have serial peaking and shunt peaking, and yet other stages may have neither serial peaking nor shunt peaking.
The wideband data amplifiers according to the present invention are small signal amplifiers. The primary object of the wide band data amplifiers according to the present invention is to have high gain, so as to increase signal strength from input to output. Preferably, the wide band data amplifiers are linear in their small signal transfer function, thus they are linear amplifiers. Each stage in the multi-stage wide band data amplifier according to the present invention presents a pole in the complex plane. Because a wideband data amplifier according to present invention is multi-stage, with each successive stage, the bandwidth from input to output becomes shorter and shorter.
Therefore, it is desirable to create a data amplifier having a bandwidth of around, for example, 10 gigahertz and having about, e.g., 6 stages, as illustrated in FIG. 7. With today's fabrication processes, this is not possible with conventional amplifier stages.
The multi-stage amplifier 700 illustrated in
Shunt peaking increases the bandwidth of a single stage, and therefore also increases the bandwidth of the multi-stage amplifier in which the single stage is present. Shunt peaking creates a peak in the gain of the amplifier toward the high end of the spectrum; however, there is an unavoidable roll off of the transfer function at the high end of the spectrum, and it is also undesirable to make the peak too high because it causes distortion.
With series peaking, the peak frequency fseries is given by the following equation for an ideal inductor and capacitor.
Depending upon the Q of the real inductor and capacitor, the frequency response of the series peaking stage is similar to the shunt peaking frequency response.
By selection of the proper series inductor, the peaking frequency of the series peaking stage can be chosen so as to peak just above the roll off frequency of all the preceding stages. If the roll off frequency of the preceding stages is, e.g., 8 gigahertz, then peaking frequency of the next series peaking stage is chosen to be above 8 gigahertz, so that the frequency response of the multi-stage amplifier ending in series peaking stage is fairly flat, and so that the roll off frequency of the multi-stage amplifier is around, e.g., 10 gigahertz.
In order to increase the peaking frequency of the serial peaking stage, either the inductance of the inductor can be reduced, or alternatively the capacitance of the capacitor can be reduced. However, if the inductance of the inductor is reduced, the peaking level gets smaller, thereby reducing the ability to effectively compensate for roll off of the previous stages. However, by reducing the capacitance of the capacitor, the serial peaking of the gain is increased, and also the frequency of the serial peaking is increased.
There is a parasitic Miller capacitance from gate to drain of a CMOS transistor. cross-coupled capacitors are included in the circuit stage according to the present invention in order to cancel the Miller capacitances.
Thus, according to one embodiment of the present invention, serial peaking, shunt peaking, and Miller cancellation are combined. The combination according to the present invention results in a flat response to a higher roll off frequency than with conventional wide band data amplifiers, and also there is low distortion of the phase. For a linear system, it is desirable to have the same delay for all frequencies, in order to facilitate proper signal recovery. The phase is a function of the delay and is given by the following equation.
φ=2πƒΔt
Therefore, if every frequency component incurs the same delay through the amplifier, then the phase will be different for each frequency, but the phase will be linearly proportional to the frequency. Distortion of the phase results when there is a different delay for each frequency, thus phase is not linearly related to frequency.
The present invention is applicable to any wideband application, such as a SONET application.
In the first stage, the bond wire inductance can be used to instantiate the series peaking inductance. In order to achieve a flat frequency response, the series peaking stage is used to extend the bandwidth resulting from several shunt peaking stages. The series peaking stage can effectively be used to achieve higher bandwidth towards the end of the amplifier. However, because the earlier stages in the amplifier preferably are primarily concerned with achieving high gain, they are unable to produce a high band width. The peaking frequency of the series peaking stages are easily adjustable by changing the inductor value in order to get a wide band width.
Preferably, the last stage has shunt peaking without anything else, perhaps with a fifty ohm output resistor. Because the first stage has bonding wire with an inherent inductance, series peaking is nearly necessary for the first stage. Because a rather certain level of noise is injected into all the signals at all stages, it is desirable to increase the gain as much as practicable in the early stages so that the signal-to-noise ratio is as high as possible throughout the amplifier. A certain noise power corrupts a smaller signal proportionately more than a larger signal. If the signal is smaller in the intermediate stages, noise corrupts the smaller signal, and the noise is amplified along with the signal later in the amplifier. Thus, by having most of the gain at the early stages, only the noise incurred in the early high gain stages is amplified, while the noise absorbed by the later lower gain stages is not amplified as much.
For noise reasons, it is desirable to realize high gain near the beginning of the amplifier, especially in the first stage of the amplifier. Therefore, the transistors in the first stage are fairly large in comparison to later stages. Miller cancellation is more easily accomplished in higher gain stages rather than in lower gain stages. The size of the capacitance required to cancel a given miller capacitance Cgd is given below.
Where A is the gain of the stage. Thus, for example, if A is 1, no capacitor is large enough to cancel the miller capacitance. However, for very large gain, the cancellation capacitor is only incrementally larger than the miller capacitance.
The miller capacitance affect the output pole, so it is desirable to have the capacitor appear in a stage where the gain is fairly high. That way, the miller capacitance can be effectively canceled, and the output stage does not see that much capacitance. In the last stage, shunt peaking is used because the signal is limited, so the bandwidth does not matter too much. In addition, it is desirable to avoid ringing on the output. With shunt peaking, it is possible to make a fairly linear phase characteristic, but the bandwidth can still be extended. The driver stage also uses a lot of current because it typically drives a relatively low impedance, so the bandwidth is generally not a big problem. The last stage typically drives out of the integrated circuit and into another device.
The multi-stage amplifier according to the present invention is implemented with multiple stages primarily for gain purposes, although the signal is typically increased in strength somewhat as well. For example, the signal coming into the chip may be on the order of 10 millivolts, while it is desirable to drive the signal out at 500 millivolts.
In series peaking, the signal is taken at the gate of the transistor, the point in series with the inductor and the parasitic capacitor. In addition, there is a parasitic capacitor between the positive power supply and the output signal, which is termed the shunt capacitor. In shunt peaking, the output signal is taken from the parallel combination of the parasitic shunt capacitor and the inductor resistor output path from the power supply to the output signal.
While the present invention has been described with reference to its presently preferred and alternative embodiments, those embodiments are offered by way of example, not by way of limitation. Those skilled in the art will be enabled by this disclosure to make various modifications and additions to the embodiments described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, those various modifications and additions are deemed to lie within the scope of present invention as delineated by the following appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/028,806 filed Oct. 25, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,699.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4449248 | Leslie et al. | May 1984 | A |
4519068 | Krebs et al. | May 1985 | A |
4545023 | Mizzi | Oct 1985 | A |
4680787 | Marry | Jul 1987 | A |
4731796 | Masterton et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4737975 | Shafer | Apr 1988 | A |
4761822 | Maile | Aug 1988 | A |
4777657 | Gillaspie | Oct 1988 | A |
4794649 | Fujiwara | Dec 1988 | A |
4804954 | Macnak et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4807282 | Kazan et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4817115 | Campo et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4850009 | Zook et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4885548 | Wakimoto et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4890832 | Komaki | Jan 1990 | A |
4894792 | Mitchell et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4916441 | Gombrich | Apr 1990 | A |
4964121 | Moore | Oct 1990 | A |
4969206 | Desrochers | Nov 1990 | A |
4977611 | Maru | Dec 1990 | A |
4995099 | Davis | Feb 1991 | A |
5008879 | Fischer et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5025486 | Klughart | Jun 1991 | A |
5029183 | Tymes | Jul 1991 | A |
5031231 | Miyazaki | Jul 1991 | A |
5033109 | Kawano et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5055659 | Hendrick et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5055660 | Bertagna et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5081402 | Koleda | Jan 1992 | A |
5087099 | Stolarczyk | Feb 1992 | A |
5117501 | Childress et al. | May 1992 | A |
5119502 | Kallin et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5121408 | Cai et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5123029 | Bantz et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5128938 | Borras | Jul 1992 | A |
5134347 | Koleda | Jul 1992 | A |
5142573 | Umezawa | Aug 1992 | A |
5150361 | Wieczorek et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5152006 | Klaus | Sep 1992 | A |
5153878 | Krebs | Oct 1992 | A |
5175870 | Mabey et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5179721 | Comroe et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5181200 | Harrison | Jan 1993 | A |
5230084 | Nguyen | Jul 1993 | A |
5239662 | Danielson et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241542 | Natarajan et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241691 | Owen | Aug 1993 | A |
5249220 | Moskowitz et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5249302 | Metroka et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5265238 | Canova, Jr. et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5265270 | Stengel et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5274666 | Dowdell et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5276680 | Messenger | Jan 1994 | A |
5278831 | Mabey et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5289469 | Tanaka | Feb 1994 | A |
5291516 | Dixon et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5293639 | Wilson et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5296849 | Ide | Mar 1994 | A |
5297144 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5323392 | Ishii et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5349649 | Iijima | Sep 1994 | A |
5361397 | Wright | Nov 1994 | A |
5363121 | Freund | Nov 1994 | A |
5373149 | Rasmussen | Dec 1994 | A |
5373506 | Tayloe et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5390206 | Rein et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392023 | D'Avello et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5406615 | Miller, II et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5406643 | Burke et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5418837 | Johansson et al. | May 1995 | A |
5423002 | Hart | Jun 1995 | A |
5426637 | Derby et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428636 | Meier | Jun 1995 | A |
5430845 | Rimmer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5438329 | Gastouniotis et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5440560 | Rypinski | Aug 1995 | A |
5465081 | Todd | Nov 1995 | A |
5481265 | Russell | Jan 1996 | A |
5481562 | Pearson et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5533029 | Gardner | Jul 1996 | A |
5535373 | Oinowich | Jul 1996 | A |
5544222 | Robinson et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5579487 | Meyerson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5584048 | Wieczorek | Dec 1996 | A |
5628055 | Stein | May 1997 | A |
5630061 | Richter et al. | May 1997 | A |
5680633 | Koenck et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5732346 | Lazaridis et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740366 | Mahany et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5744366 | Kricka et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5793551 | Ngo et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796727 | Harrison et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5839051 | Grimmett et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5940771 | Gollnick et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6014705 | Koenck et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6194972 | Brown | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6259321 | Song et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6340899 | Green | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6366166 | Belot | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374311 | Mahany et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6414558 | Ryan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6417737 | Moloudi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424194 | Hairapetian | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6774721 | Popescu et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6774722 | Hogervorst | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6864558 | Momtaz et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0163767 | Aug 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040056717 A1 | Mar 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10028806 | Oct 2001 | US |
Child | 10618462 | US |