Patent Grant
9984818
The present application relates generally to distribution line monitoring, sensor monitoring, and power harvesting.
Power harvesting using induction pick-up from the magnetic field surrounding a power distribution line can be used to provide power to distribution line monitoring sensors. Typically, the power line is routed through a current transformer whereby an AC signal is derived from the magnetic field induced by the AC current flow in the distribution line. The AC signal is converted to DC as part of the power harvesting process and used to power the monitoring sensors and associated electronics. This is typically referred to as “inductive harvesting using current transformers.”
One method of mounting the current transformer (C.T.) on the distribution line is to cut the C.T. in two, mount the halves around the uncut distribution line, and mechanically hold the two C.T. halves together. Because the changing magnetic field (AC) causes the magnetic force of attraction between halves of a split core current transformer to alternate between a zero force and a peak force at twice the AC line frequency, the core halves need to be mechanically held together, which can be challenging in a hot-stick deployed sensor application.
Such current transformers, when combined with power conversion circuitry, can provide power to the internal circuitry of the sensor.
A power converter, as typically connected to an electrical source, needs to be designed to operate over a range of inputs appropriate for that application. Common cord-connected equipment, for example, might have a requirement to operate with an input that may vary 10% from a certain nominal voltage. Likewise, electrical devices in automobiles operate over a certain range of allowable inputs voltages. Power line sensors, however, have a challenging requirement because of their need to operate over very wide ranges of inputs. For example, a sensor may be specified to operate from 5 amps to 1000 amps. Designing sensors for such applications require specialized circuitry to provide the stable, fixed power to operate the internal circuitry.
In one embodiment, a method of monitoring a power grid distribution network is provided, comprising the steps of harvesting energy from a conductor line of the power grid distribution network with a split-core transformer of a monitoring device installed on the conductor line, powering the monitoring device with the harvested energy, during normal conductor line conditions, creating a DC current in the split-core transformer with a half-wave control circuit of the monitoring device to saturate a magnetic core of the split-core transformer during positive half-cycles to limit harvested energy, and in the event of fault conditions on the conductor line, creating the DC current in the split-core transformer with a full-wave control circuit of the monitoring device to saturate the magnetic core of the split-core transformer during negative and positive half-cycles to prevent harvested energy.
In one embodiment, currents between 20-1400 amps flow in the conductor line during normal conductor line conditions.
In another embodiment, the method further comprises conducting current through a Zener diode in a reverse direction to allow a TRIAC to conduct the DC current to short the split-core transformer during positive half-cycles.
In some embodiments, currents greater than 1400 amps flow in the conductor line during fault conditions.
In one embodiment, the method further comprises conducting current through a Zener diode in a reverse direction to create a voltage across a resistor which allows a TRIAC to conduct the DC current to short the split-core transformer during negative half-cycles.
A method of monitoring a power grid distribution network is provided, comprising the steps of harvesting energy from a conductor line of the power grid distribution network with a harvesting coil wound around a split-core transformer of a monitoring device installed on the conductor line; powering the monitoring device with the harvested energy, creating a DC current in the harvesting coil with a half-wave control circuit of the monitoring device to short the split-core transformer to limit harvested energy during positive half-cycles, and in the event of an abnormally high current on the conductor line, changing the half-wave control circuit to a full-wave control circuit and creating the DC current in the harvesting coil with the full-wave control circuit to short the split-core transformer to limit harvested energy during positive and negative half-cycles.
In some embodiments, the DC current is created with the half-wave control circuit at moderate currents between 2-1400 amps in the conductor line.
In another embodiment, the method further comprises conducting current through a Zener diode in a reverse direction to allow a TRIAC to conduct the DC current to short the split-core transformer during positive half-cycles.
In one embodiment, the DC current is created with the full-wave control circuit at high currents above 1400 amps in the conductor line.
In another embodiment, the method further comprises conducting current through a Zener diode in a reverse direction to create a voltage across a resistor which allows a TRIAC to conduct the DC current to short the split-core transformer during negative half-cycles.
A power line monitoring device is provided, comprising a split-core current transformer comprising first and second core halves, the split-core transformer being configured to harvest energy from a conductor line of a power grid distribution network to power the power line monitoring device, secondary windings disposed around at least the first core half of the split-core transformer, and a control circuit electrically coupled to the secondary windings, the control circuit configured to create a DC current to short the secondary windings to limit harvested energy during positive half-cycles, and in the event of an abnormally high current on the conductor line, being configured to create the DC to short the secondary windings to limit harvested energy during positive and negative half-cycles.
In one embodiment, the control circuit comprises a first Zener diode, a second Zener diode, a third Zener diode, a fourth Zener diode, a resistor, and a TRIAC.
In one embodiment, the first Zener diode, the second Zener diode, and the TRIAC combine to form a half-wave control circuit that shorts the secondary windings to limit harvested energy during positive half-cycles.
In another embodiment, current is conducted through the first Zener diode in a reverse direction to allow the TRIAC to conduct the DC current to short the secondary windings during positive half-cycles.
In one embodiment, the half-wave circuit shorts the secondary windings at normal line currents in the conductor line between 20-1400 amps.
In another embodiment, the third Zener diode, the fourth Zener diode, the resistor, and the TRIAC combine with the half-wave control circuit to form a full-wave control circuit that shorts the secondary windings to limit harvested energy during negative and positive half-cycles.
In some embodiments, current is conducted through the third Zener diode in a reverse direction to create a voltage across the resistor, which allows the TRIAC to conduct the DC current to short the secondary windings during negative half-cycles.
In one embodiment, the full-wave circuit shorts the secondary windings at extreme line currents in the conductor line above 1400 amps.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the claims that follow. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
Power line monitoring devices and systems described herein are configured to measure the currents and voltages of power grid distribution networks. Referring to
Monitoring devices 102, 104, and 106 can be mounted on each power line of a three-phase network, as shown, and can be configured to monitor, among other things, current flow in the power line and current waveforms, conductor temperatures, ambient temperatures, vibration, wind speed and monitoring device system diagnostics. In some embodiments, a fourth sensor can be mounted on the ground line near the three phase lines. In additional embodiments, multiple sensors can be used on a single phase line. The monitoring devices can be mounted quickly and easily via a hot-stick 116, and can harvest energy from the power lines for operation with or without additional supplemental power (e.g., include batteries or solar panels). The monitoring devices can further include wireless transmission and receiving capabilities for communication with a central server and for communications between each monitoring device. Installation of a three monitoring device array can be placed and configured by a single linesman with a hot-stick and a bucket truck in less than 20 minutes. Monitoring device communication with the installation crew can be enabled during the installation process to provide immediate verification of successful installation.
Furthermore, monitoring devices 102, 104, and 106 are configured to also measure the electric field surrounding the power lines, to record and analyze event/fault signatures, and to classify event waveforms. Current and electric field waveform signatures can be monitored and catalogued by the monitoring devices to build a comprehensive database of events, causes, and remedial actions. In some embodiments, an application executed on a central server can provide waveform and event signature cataloguing and profiling for access by the monitoring devices and by utility companies. This system can provide fault localization information with remedial action recommendations to utility companies, pre-emptive equipment failure alerts, and assist in power quality management of the distribution grid.
Monitoring devices 102, 104, and 106 can comprise sensing elements, a power supply, a battery, a microprocessor board, and high powered communication systems (not shown) disposed within a robust mechanical housing designed for severe service conditions. The monitoring devices are configured to withstand temperatures ranging from −40 to +85 C., EMI and ESD immunity, current and voltage impulse resistance, driving rain and precipitation and salt fog survival. A typical embodiment of the monitoring devices is configured to operate continuously on power lines carrying up to 800 ARMS operating current with full functionality. Full functionality is also maintained during line fault current events up to 10 kARMS and of limited time duration.
The monitoring devices can be configured to communicate wirelessly through a distribution network to the power utilities sensor control and distribution automation (SCADA) system. In some embodiments, the monitoring devices operate at differing powers with a custom designed omni-directional antenna. When mounted to typical power grid distribution networks, the monitoring devices are located approximately 30 feet above ground level and typically above tree tops, providing for a very substantial effective range of communication. In addition to two-way network communications for data packets and setting operational setpoints, the monitoring devices can be configured for wireless device firmware upgrades for long term functionality.
The monitoring devices described herein can also include power harvesting systems configured to convert the changing magnetic field surrounding the distribution lines into current and/or voltage that can be rectified into DC current and used to power the monitoring devices.
Referring to
The current induced in the harvesting core coil supplies AC power to the electronic circuits of the monitoring devices 102, 104, and 106 of
Typically a power harvesting system based on a current transformer would produce an ever-increasing output voltage as the line current increases. Because fault currents in power conductors are substantially higher than operating currents (e.g., 25,000 amps vs 5-800 amps), these voltages can reach destructive levels. The present disclosure provides a control circuit configured to provide three district modes of operation, (1) no harvest power limitation, (2) limit the harvest power by means of DC saturation, and (3) avoid problems of DC saturation at extremely high currents by using AC saturation. The control circuit of the present disclosure can therefore limit the output voltage of the power harvesting system to a lower level and protect the circuitry and electrical components of the monitoring devices from destructive voltages occurring during fault currents. Because of the requirement to operate over a wide range of input currents, the critical design point is to create this desired amount of power with the lowest allowable input current, in a lightweight package.
The control circuit 306 of
At moderate line currents (e.g., between 20-1400 amps) the control circuit 306 operates as a half-wave control circuit to short the split-core transformer to limit harvested energy during positive half-cycles. During positive half-cycles, Zener diode (D1) reaches its conduction point which triggers TRIAC (Q1). This causes Q1 to conduct DC current, which shorts the harvesting coil 202 for the remainder of the half-cycle. The conduction point of Zener diode (D3) is not reached during negative half-cycles at moderate line currents. Thus, DC current flows through TRIAC (Q1) only during positive half-cycles, which saturates the magnetic core of the split core transformer. This serves to limit the total amount of harvested power by harvesting only during negative half-cycles.
When the control circuit 306 is subjected to high line currents above the normal operating range (e.g., greater than 1400 amps), the control circuit 306 changes to a full-wave control circuit to short the split-core transformer to limit harvested energy during positive and negative half-cycles. At high line currents, Zener diode (D3) reaches its conduction point. The DC current flowing through Zener diode (D3) creates a voltage across resistor (R1). When sufficient voltage develops it will trigger TRIAC (Q1) to conduct DC current, thus shorting the harvesting coil for the remainder of the negative half-cycle.
It is important to note that triggering TRIAC (Q1) during a positive half-cycle is determined by a voltage (i.e., D1's voltage), yet triggering TRIAC (Q1) during a negative half-cycle is determined by a current (i.e., R1's voltage). In this mode of operation, power harvesting is not allowed during either positive or negative half-cycles. This allows the positive half-cycle mode and the negative half-cycle mode to initiate at slightly different criteria (e.g., between 20-1400 amps in one mode and above 1400 amps in the other mode). As should be understood, the criteria that trigger each mode can be adjusted depending on the desired operating characteristics of the device.
The control circuit can be configured to operate in three distinct mode of operation, as described above: Mode 1—harvest as much energy as possible at very low levels of line current. In this case, the power harvesting system is designed to maximize the amount of output power without any electrical limitations. Mode 2—begin to limit the amount of harvested energy as the line current increases. Harvesting more than is needed could result in increased size, complexity and heat waste. Mode 3—protect against very high line currents, as might be expected during power line fault conditions.
In any power producing circuit, there are two customary ways to stop the flow of power, open the electrical circuit (e.g., a switch), or short circuit the output. Each of these is a possible scenario. However, each will affect the transformer in a different way.
Opening the circuit will cause the power line current to generate large magnetic fields in the magnetic core of the split core transformer. These magnetic fields will generate high voltages across the primary and harvesting coils, which will have to be accounted for in the circuit design. The magnetic fields in the core will alternate polarity coinciding with the AC line frequency, but will be limited in amplitude only by the maximum “saturation” level of the core material. So therefore, in this mode, the core will alternate between its maximum positive magnetic field to its maximum negative magnetic field. Operation between these saturation values will cause several effects on the magnetic core's magnetic material. It produces heat, due to various losses inside the core material, and it becomes audibly loud, due to magnetostriction and other magnetic forces. However, one benefit of operating with an open circuit, it that the power lost in the harvesting coil is very small, because winding current only flows during the small portion of the line cycles when harvest power is needed.
In contrast to opening the circuit, described above, the preferred method to remove power from a current transformer is to short-circuit the harvesting coil. In this case, virtually no output voltage produced. The magnetic field inside the core material is also relatively small, so the core's losses are smaller, and the audible noise is lower.
However, to achieve this condition, the split core transformer must be allowed to transform the power line current into harvesting coil current (by the ratio of the number of turns). Conventionally, this would require a larger diameter core to be used, due to the need “balance” the amp-turns of the primary winding with the amp-turns of the harvesting coil. Of course, this larger core is heavier, due both to the increased core material, and also due to the weight of the copper winding.
In both of these conditions: open-circuiting and short-circuiting, the power line current produces alternate, symmetric magnetic fields, in the core material. The principles of transformer design say that power is only transformed as the magnetic field is changing. Thus, in the Mode 2 of operation, the control circuit can limit the power produced by creating a strong DC bias in the magnetic core, and only allowing the magnetic field to change when harvest power is required.
A noteworthy aspect of this design is that the creation of DC is derived from the half-wave control circuit. This control circuit has only half the average current of a classic transformer's circuit, so the amount of copper in the harvesting coil is reduced. This is accompanied by a reduction in size and weight.
The half-wave circuit, described above, although having a lower size and weight, cannot survive extreme fault currents. As stated earlier, a conventional current transformer must balance the amp-turns of the primary coil with the amp-turns of the harvesting coil. However, the control circuit of the present disclosure uses less copper due to the half-wave (DC) mode of operation. The Mode 3 of operation exploits the use of less copper. For example, above the normal operating range of currents, the control circuit can change the half-wave circuit to a full-wave circuit, and thus remove the DC bias of the magnetic field, which reverts to a full AC swing of the magnetic field. However, the resistance of the harvesting coil (which is determined by the Mode 2 parameters) will force the transformer to magnetically saturate due to the high voltage requirement of that winding. At high fault currents, the saturation occurs early in the line cycle, so the transformer, being saturated, cannot transform the high current of the primary fault current into a proportionally high current in the harvesting coil. This limitation of the winding current again goes towards a reduction in size and weight of the transformer.
In some embodiments, the control circuit can be connected to either the harvesting coil or coupled to a separate coil on the transformer. For example, in one specific embodiment, the harvesting coil can comprise 13 turns of a coiled wire, the control circuit can be coupled to a separate 300 turn control circuit coil. In transformer theory, the number of turns sets the voltage-to-current ratio. In this embodiment, the triac used in the control circuit includes a certain current rating requires a lower current that can be achieved by using more turns in the control circuit coil. Different embodiments may require individual engineering for the number of turns, but one or two coils for the energy harvesting and for the control circuit gives lots of freedom in the design. Because the two coils are on the same core, they “move” together, only differing by the voltage/current of each. The “magic” of transformers is that if the voltage is limited on one coil, the voltage is automatically limited on all coils.
As for additional details pertinent to the present invention, materials and manufacturing techniques may be employed as within the level of those with skill in the relevant art. The same may hold true with respect to method-based aspects of the invention in terms of additional acts commonly or logically employed. Also, it is contemplated that any optional feature of the inventive variations described may be set forth and claimed independently, or in combination with any one or more of the features described herein. Likewise, reference to a singular item, includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” “said,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The breadth of the present invention is not to be limited by the subject specification, but rather only by the plain meaning of the claim terms employed.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Appln. No. 62/263,512, filed Dec. 4, 2015, which application is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3075166 | Peek | Jan 1963 | A |
| 3558984 | Smith et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
| 3676740 | Schweitzer, Jr. | Jul 1972 | A |
| 3686531 | Decker et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3702966 | Schweitzer, Jr. | Nov 1972 | A |
| 3708724 | Schweitzer, Jr. | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3715742 | Schweitzer, Jr. | Feb 1973 | A |
| 3720872 | Russell et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
| 3725832 | Schweitzer, Jr. | Apr 1973 | A |
| 3755714 | Link | Aug 1973 | A |
| 3768011 | Swain | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3777217 | Groce et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3816816 | Schweitzer, Jr. | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3866197 | Schweitzer, Jr. | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3876911 | Schweitzer, Jr. | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3957329 | McConnell | May 1976 | A |
| 3970898 | Baumann et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
| 4063161 | Pardis | Dec 1977 | A |
| 4152643 | Schweitzer, Jr. | May 1979 | A |
| 4339792 | Yasumura et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4378525 | Burdick | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4396794 | Stiller | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4396968 | Stiller | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4398057 | Shankle et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4408155 | McBride | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4466071 | Russell, Jr. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4559491 | Saha | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4570231 | Bunch | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4584523 | Elabd | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4649457 | Talbot et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4654573 | Rough et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4709339 | Fernandes | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4714893 | Smith Vaniz et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4723220 | Smith Vaniz | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4728887 | Davis | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4746241 | Burbank | May 1988 | A |
| 4766549 | Schweitzer, III et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4775839 | Kosina et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4808916 | Smith Vaniz | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4829298 | Fernandes | May 1989 | A |
| 4881028 | Bright | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4886980 | Fernandes et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4904932 | Schweitzer, Jr. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4937769 | Verbanets | Jun 1990 | A |
| 5006846 | Granville et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5125738 | Kawamura et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5138265 | Kawamura et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5159561 | Watanabe et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5181026 | Granville | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5182547 | Griffith | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5202812 | Shinoda et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5206595 | Wiggins et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5220311 | Schweitzer, Jr. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5428549 | Chen | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5438256 | Thuries et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5473244 | Libove et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5495169 | Smith | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5550476 | Lau et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5565783 | Lau et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5600248 | Westrom et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5608328 | Sanderson | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5650728 | Rhein et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5656931 | Lau et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5682100 | Rossi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5696788 | Choi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5712796 | Ohura et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5729144 | Cummins | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5737203 | Barrett | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5764065 | Richards et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5839093 | Novosel et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5892430 | Wiesman et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5905646 | Crewson et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5990674 | Schweitzer, Jr. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6002260 | Lau et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6016105 | Schweitzer, Jr. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6043433 | Schweitzer, Jr. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6133723 | Feight | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6133724 | Schweitzer, Jr. et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6288632 | Hoctor et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6292340 | O'Regan et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6347027 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6433698 | Schweitzer, Jr. et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6459998 | Hoffman | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6466030 | Hu et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6466031 | Hu et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6477475 | Takaoka et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6483435 | Saha et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6549880 | Willoughby et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6559651 | Crick | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6566854 | Hagmann et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6577108 | Hubert et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6601001 | Moore | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6622285 | Rust et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6677743 | Coolidge et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6718271 | Tobin | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6734662 | Fenske | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6798211 | Rockwell et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6822457 | Borchert et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6822576 | Feight et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6879917 | Turner | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6894478 | Fenske | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6914763 | Reedy | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6917888 | Logvinov et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6927672 | Zalitsky et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6949921 | Feight et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6963197 | Feight et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6980090 | Mollenkopf | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7023691 | Feight et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7046124 | Cope et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7053601 | Fenske et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7072163 | McCollough, Jr. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7076378 | Huebner | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7085659 | Peterson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7106048 | Feight et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7158012 | Wiesman et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7187275 | McCollough, Jr. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7203622 | Pan et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7272516 | Wang et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7295133 | McCollough, Jr. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7400150 | Cannon | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7424400 | McCormack et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7449991 | Mollenkopf | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7450000 | Gidge et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7508638 | Hooper | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7518529 | O'Sullivan et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7532012 | Cern | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7557563 | Gunn et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7626794 | Swartzendruber et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7633262 | Lindsey et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7672812 | Stoupis et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7683798 | Rostron | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7701356 | Curt et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7714592 | Radtke et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7720619 | Hou | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7725295 | Stoupis et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7742393 | Bonicatto et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7764943 | Radtke | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7795877 | Radtke et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7795994 | Radtke | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7804280 | Deaver, Sr. et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7930141 | Banting | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 8421444 | Gunn | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8497781 | Engelhardt et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8594956 | Banting et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8786292 | Parsons | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 9182429 | Saxby et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9229036 | Kast et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9448257 | Saxby et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9581624 | Rostron et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 20040156154 | Lazarovich et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20050073200 | Divan et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20080077336 | Fernandes | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20090058582 | Webb | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090309754 | Bou et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100085036 | Banting et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20110032739 | Juhlin | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20120039062 | McBee et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120236611 | Alexandrov et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20130162136 | Baldwin et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20140062221 | Papastergiou | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140145858 | Miller et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140174170 | Davis | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140192458 | Valdes | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140226366 | Morokuma et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140260598 | Miller | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20150198667 | Krekeler | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20160116505 | Kast et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160197470 | Baker et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20170199533 | McCollough | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1508146 | Feb 2005 | EP |
| 1938159 | Jul 2008 | EP |
| 2340592 | Jul 2011 | EP |
| 2350764 | Aug 2011 | EP |
| Entry |
|---|
| Chen et al.; Development of arc-guided protection devices against lightning breakage of covered conductors on distribution lines; IEEE Trans. Power Deliv.; 25(1); pp. 196-205; Jan. 2010. |
| Chen Yang Technologies; Split core hall effect dc current sensor CYHCT-C2TC; 4 pages; retrieved from the internet Jan. 5, 2015 (http://www.hallsensors.de/CYHCT-C2TC.pdf) (Product Information). |
| Saha et al.; Fault Location on Power Networks (Power Systems); Springer Verlag; London, UK; 435 pgs.; 2010 (Preface: Oct. 2009). |
| Shepard et al.; An overview of rogowski coil current sensing technology; 13 pages; retrieved from the internet Jan. 5, 2016(http://www.dynamp.net/Idadocum.nsf/c2270fbdd892ac3e86256e75000ad88a/e710af6d3e0f6255862565d7004b19db/$FILE/Report.pdf). |
| Stringfield et al.; Fault location methods for overhead lines; in Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers; Amer. Inst. of Electrical Eng.; New York, NY; Part. III; vol. 76; pp. 518-530; Aug. 1957. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170162320 A1 | Jun 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62263512 | Dec 2015 | US |
