This application is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from the prior Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-81127, filed on Apr. 22, 2019, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Embodiments described herein relate generally to a current interrupting device and a selecting method of a transistor utilized in the current interrupting device.
Due to the widespread use of renewable energy and storage batteries, electric power networks tend to become more complex, and the current flowing through the current path in the power network is also increasing. A current interrupting device is connected to the current path in the power network so as to prevent electrical equipment from being broken due to a large current flowing in the event of a short-circuit accident.
An MCCB (Molded Case Circuit Breaker, a kind of breakers) and a fuse are generally used for the current interrupting device. The MCCB has problems of requiring a long time (milliseconds level) to cut off a short circuit current of the specification, and of having no guarantee of interruption of the second short circuit current after it is again turned on from the viewpoint of reliability on a mechanical contact. The fuse requires a shorter time (several hundreds of microseconds) to interrupt a current than the MCCB. However, the fuse has problems that a current 10 times or more the rated current is required to melt the fuse, and that the fuse cannot be used again because it is melted. In a complicated electric power network, a semiconductor current interrupting device (called e.g. solid state circuit breaker: SSCB) has attracted attention as a current interrupting device that can be used again and can interrupt a short circuit current at high speed (several microseconds) so that the short-circuit current does not increase.
The current interrupting device can be composed of, for example, a power transistor and an inductor. The inductor is provided to suppress the rise of a surge current (di/dt) flowing through the current path in the event of an accident such as a short circuit. In order to reduce the value of a current to be interrupted in the event of an accident, it is also necessary to increase the size of the inductor, which may hamper size reduction and cost reduction of the current interrupting device. In addition, a power loss increases with an increase in size of the inductor.
According to one embodiment, a current interrupting device has a first transistor that is normally off and that switches whether to interrupt a current path, and a controller that controls a gate voltage of the first transistor such that, when no overcurrent flows through the current path, the first transistor is operated in an active region, and when an overcurrent flows through the current path, the first transistor is operated in a saturation region to limit the overcurrent, and then, the current path is interrupted.
The first transistor 2 is connected on a predetermined current path 4, and switches whether to interrupt the current path 4. Although the specific location and application of the current path 4 to which the first transistor 2 is connected are not limited, the current path 4 is assumed to have a possibility of having a large current flowing therethrough due to a short-circuit accident.
The first transistor 2 is, for example, a silicon power MOSFET (Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor) or a silicon carbide BJT (Bipolar Junction Transistor). Although not shown in
Normally-off means that no current flows between the drain and source of the first transistor 2, when a gate voltage of the first transistor 2 is set to, for example, 0 V, and an off command is given to the first transistor 2.
The controller 3 controls the gate voltage of the first transistor 2. More specifically, the controller 3 controls the gate voltage of the first transistor 2 such that, when no overcurrent flows through the current path 4, the first transistor 2 is operated in an active region, and when a situation such as a short-circuit accident in which an overcurrent flows through the current path 4 occurs, a fixed gate voltage is applied to the first transistor 2 so as to operate the first transistor 2 in a saturation region and to limit a current due to the accident, and after the current due to the accident is limited, the current path 4 is cut off. The controller 3 may be composed of, for example, a semiconductor IC or a discrete circuit.
The controller 3 sets the gate voltage to be the same between when the first transistor 2 is operated in the active region and when the first transistor 2 is operated in the saturation region. More specifically, the controller 3 sets the gate voltage according to a maximum allowable current value that indicates a current allowed to flow through the current path 4 when an overcurrent flows through the current path 4, and applies the set gate voltage to the gate of the first transistor 2 even when no overcurrent flows through the current path 4.
The controller 3 according to the present embodiment applies a gate voltage corresponding to a specific IV curve among the plurality of IV curves to the gate of the first transistor 2. For example, if the operating point during normal operation where no overcurrent flows through the current path 4 is point A in
Thus, in the present embodiment, the operating point is moved on the same IV curve between during normal operation and during abnormal operation in which overcurrent flows. Therefore, a rapid increase in the drain current Id is less likely to occur during the abnormal operation, and an operation of limiting the current to about 15 A can be performed.
In an actual transistor, it is rare that the slopes of a plurality of IV curves in the active region are similar to one another as shown in
The voltage determination unit 6 determines whether or not the voltage detected by the voltage detector 5 exceeds a predetermined threshold. When the voltage determination unit 6 determines that the voltage exceeds the predetermined threshold, the controller 3 adjusts the gate voltage so as to turn off the first transistor 2. The voltage determination unit 6 may be built in the controller 3.
Setting the gate voltage to 5 V, for example, means that the first transistor 2 is driven with the gate voltage being reduced in advance. Conventionally in the current interrupting device 1, the gate voltage is increased to about 15 V in order to reduce the on resistance of the transistor as much as possible during normal operation, whereas in the present embodiment, the transistor in which slopes are similar to one another in the active region is driven with the gate voltage being rather reduced to about 5 V during normal operation. When the transistor in which the slopes in the active region are similar to one another is driven with a reduced gate voltage, the current flowing through the current path 4 is limited to the maximum allowable current by saturation characteristics without increasing the on resistance, unlike the conventional current interrupting device 1 in which the on resistance is relatively high when the transistor is driven with the gate voltage being reduced.
When the gate voltage is set to about 5 V, the first transistor 2 operates in the active region during normal operation, and the drain to source voltage Vds of the first transistor 2 is, for example, about 1 to 2 V (step S2).
The voltage detector 5 continuously monitors the drain to source voltage Vds of the first transistor 2 (step S3). When the current flowing through the current path 4 increases due to an accident or the like, the operating point of the first transistor 2 automatically moves from the active region to the saturation region (step S4). In the saturation region, the drain current Id assumes a value during a current limiting operation that is slightly greater than that during normal operation.
The voltage determination unit 6 determines whether or not the drain to source voltage Vds of the first transistor 2 has exceeded a predetermined threshold (step S5). Until the voltage determination unit 6 determines that the drain to source voltage Vds of the first transistor 2 has exceeded the threshold value, the processes in steps S3 and S4 are continued. When a short-circuit accident or the like occurs, the operating point shifts from point A to point B in
The inventor of the present invention conducted an experiment for causing the first transistor 2 to operate in the active region during normal operation, and to operate in the saturation region during abnormal operation in which an overcurrent flows.
The horizontal axis in
The dashed line in
The conventional current interrupting device 1 having a gate voltage of 15 V determines that an accident occurs when the drain current Id exceeds 20 A, for example, and decreases the gate voltage to 0 V at time t1 due to a control delay or the like. The current interrupting device in which the gate voltage is set to 6 V determines that an accident occurs when the drain to source voltage Vds exceeds 5 V, for example, and decreases the gate voltage to 0 V at time t1 due to a control delay or the like. The current interrupting device according to the present invention can interrupt an overcurrent caused by a short-circuit accident more quickly than the conventional current interrupting device, because voltage detection is performed faster than current detection, and a potential difference is smaller when the voltage is decreased from 6 V to 0 V than when the voltage is decreased from 15 V to 0 V.
As described above, in the current interrupting device 1 according to the first embodiment, the normally-off first transistor 2 is operated in an active region on a specific IV curve during normal operation, and is operated in a saturation region on the same IV curve during abnormal operation in which overcurrent flows. Therefore, a possibility of a rapid increase in the drain current Id during the abnormal operation is eliminated, and thus, it is unnecessary to provide a large-sized inductor for suppressing a current increase rate (di/dt) of the drain current Id that increases during the abnormal operation. Therefore, the current interrupting device 1 can be reduced in size, and because power loss due to the inductor does not occur, power efficiency can be improved.
In particular, the current interrupting device 1 according to the present embodiment selects a specific IV curve according to the maximum allowable current value that indicates a current allowed to flow through the current path 4 during the abnormal operation, and applies the gate voltage corresponding to the selected IV curve to the gate of the first transistor 2 also during normal operation. When the transistor in which the slopes in the active region are similar to one another as shown in
In a current interrupting device 1 according to the second embodiment, a normally-on second transistor is cascode connected to a normally-off first transistor 2.
The breakdown voltage of the second transistor 11 is greater than the breakdown voltage of the first transistor 2. When a large voltage is applied between the drain of the second transistor 11 and the source of the first transistor 2, a voltage exceeding the breakdown voltage of the first transistor 2 is prevented from being applied between the drain and source of the first transistor 2, and a voltage that cannot be covered by the breakdown voltage of the first transistor 2 is applied between the drain and source of the second transistor 11. Thus, the breakdown voltage can be increased as compared with the current interrupting device 1 according to the first embodiment.
Like the controller 3 in
The inventor of the present invention verified the characteristics of the current interrupting device 1 in
In this example, since the gate voltage of the first transistor 2 is reduced to 3.5 V, even if the short circuit simulation switch 13 is turned on to cause a short-circuit state, the short circuit current of 200 A (=200 V/1Ω) does not flow, and the drain current Id of the first transistor 2 is about 12 A.
After time t0, a voltage of about 200 V is applied between the drain of the second transistor 11 and the source of the first transistor 2. However, as shown in
When the breakdown voltage is insufficient with only one second transistor 11, a current interrupting device 1 in which a third transistor is further cascode connected to the second transistor 11 as shown in a circuit diagram in
The current interrupting device 1 in
Like the second transistor 11, the third transistor 15 has a higher breakdown voltage than the first transistor 2. Due to the diode 16 being connected between the gate of the second transistor 11 and the gate of the third transistor 15, when the drain to source voltage Vds is determined by the gate voltage control of the first transistor 2, the gate voltage of the second transistor 11 is also determined, and the gate voltage of the third transistor 15 can also be determined. Therefore, it is not necessary to individually control the gate voltage of the second transistor 11 and the gate voltage of the third transistor 15, whereby the control of the second transistor 11 and the third transistor 15 is facilitated.
Note that the current interrupting device 1 shown in
As described above, the current interrupting device 1 according to the second embodiment is provided with the second transistor 11 cascode connected to the first transistor 2, thereby being capable of increasing the breakdown voltage, as compared to the current interrupting device provided with only the first transistor 2. Therefore, a possibility in which a voltage exceeding the breakdown voltage of the first transistor 2 is applied between the drain and source of the first transistor 2 can be eliminated. In addition, since the gate of the second transistor 11 is connected to the source of the first transistor 2, it is unnecessary to control the gate voltage of the second transistor 11, and the operation of the controller 3 may not become complicated even if the second transistor 11 is provided.
Further, when the third transistor 15 is further cascode connected to the second transistor 11, the breakdown voltage can be further increased as compared with the case where the third transistor 15 is not provided. When the diode 16 is connected between the gate of the third transistor 15 and the gate of the second transistor 11, it is not necessary to control the gate voltage of the third transistor 15. Further, when the number of transistors of the third transistor 15 is adjusted, the breakdown voltage can be adjusted according to the applied voltage.
The third embodiment described below relates to a procedure of a process for selecting the first transistor 2 in the current interrupting device 1 according to the first or second embodiment.
Next, the allowable on-resistance of the first transistor 2 that is a semiconductor interrupting element is determined based on an allowable loss (step S12). Here, the allowable loss is 0.15%, and the allowable on resistance Ron is 44.2 mΩ as an example.
Next, the maximum allowable current Ip is determined based on the rated current Id (step S13). Here, as an example, the rated current Id is 13 A, and the maximum allowable current Ip is 19.5 A which is 150% of the rated current Id. The rated current value is obtained by dividing the rated power by the rated voltage (13 A≈5000/384).
Next, one transistor is selected from selection candidates for the first transistor 2 (step S14). A rated current Id1 and a maximum allowable current Ip1 of the selected transistor are calculated with respect to N, where N is the number of parallel-connected transistors in the first transistor 2 (step S15). Id1 and Ip1 are respectively represented by Id1=Id/N and Ip1=Ip/N.
Next, the gate voltage Vgs of the transistor selected in step S14 alone is determined (step S16). Next, the on resistance ron1 of the transistor selected in step S14 alone is determined (step S17).
Next, the on resistance ron of the N parallel-connected transistors is determined (step S18). The ron is represented by ron=ron1/N.
Next, it is determined whether or not the on resistance ron is less than an allowable on-resistance Ron (step S19). If ron<Ron, the transistor selected in step S14 is selected as the first transistor 2, and N at that time is selected as the number of parallel-connected transistors (step S20). Then, the process ends.
If ron≥Ron, it is determined that the number of the parallel-connected transistors is inadequate, and the value of N is incremented by 1 (step S21). Next, it is determined whether or not N is less than the maximum limit value Nmax (step S22). If N<Nmax, it is determined that there is no corresponding transistor (step S23), and the process ends. If N<Nmax, the processes after step S15 are repeated.
Hereinafter, an example of selecting a desired BJT from SiC-BJTs as the first transistor 2 will be described with reference to the flowchart in
In step S14 in
In step S14 in
As described above, in the third embodiment, upon selecting the first transistor 2, a transistor having an on-resistance less than the allowable on resistance is selected as the first transistor 2 while varying N, where N is the number of parallel-connected selection candidate transistors. By selecting transistors in which slopes in an active region are similar to one another as candidates for the first transistor 2, it is possible to select a transistor that satisfies the allowable on resistance even when the gate voltage Vgs is reduced. Therefore, even if the first transistor 2 is composed of N parallel-connected transistors, the first transistor 2 can be operated in an active region on a specific IV curve during normal operation and can be operated in a saturation region on the same IV curve during abnormal operation in which an overcurrent flows, if the parallel-connected transistors have similar electrical characteristics.
While certain embodiments have been described, these embodiments have been presented by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the inventions. Indeed, the novel methods and systems described herein may be embodied in a variety of other forms; furthermore, various omissions, substitutions and changes in the form of the methods and systems described herein may be made without departing from the spirit of the inventions. The accompanying claims and their equivalents are intended to cover such forms or modifications as would fall within the scope and spirit of the inventions.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2019-081127 | Apr 2019 | JP | national |