The present application relates generally to control schemes for a lift fuel pump of an internal combustion engine that involve intermittently providing pulses of current to the lift fuel pump based on a number of preset parameters.
Some vehicle engine systems utilizing direct in-cylinder injection of fuel include a fuel delivery system that has multiple fuel pumps for providing suitable fuel pressure to fuel injectors. This type of fuel system, Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI), is used to increase the power efficiency and range over which the fuel can be delivered to the cylinder. GDI fuel injectors may require high pressure fuel for injection to create enhanced atomization for more efficient combustion. As one example, a GDI system can utilize an electrically driven lower pressure pump (i.e., a fuel lift pump) and a mechanically driven higher pressure pump (i.e., a direct injection pump) arranged respectively in series between the fuel tank and the fuel injectors along a fuel passage. In many GDI applications the lift fuel pump initially pressurizes fuel from the fuel tank to a fuel passage coupling the lift fuel pump and direct injection fuel pump, and the high-pressure or direct injection fuel pump may be used to further increase the pressure of fuel delivered to the fuel injectors. Various control strategies exist for operating the higher and lower pressure pumps to ensure efficient fuel system and engine operation.
In one approach to control the lift fuel pump, shown by Ulrey and Pursifull in U.S. Pat. No. 7,640,916, voltage (and current) provided to the lift fuel pump can be continuous or pulsed based on a number of parameters. The parameters include a volume of fuel in an accumulator located between the lift and direct injection fuel pumps, engine speed and load, and an amount of fuel supplied to the engine. In one example control scheme, when the efficiency of the direct injection fuel pump decrease below an efficiency (or effectiveness) threshold, the lift fuel pump is energized. In this example, the lift pump energy input may cease when the lift pump pressure rises and pressurizes the accumulator located downstream from the lift pump. In another embodiment, the lift pump efficiency is used to determine when activation of the lift pump occurs. If the lift pump efficiency decreases, then fuel vapor may be forming at the pump inlet such that lift pump pressure needs to be increased to increase efficiency of the injector pump.
However, the inventors herein have identified potential issues with the approach of U.S. Pat. No. 7,640,916. First, energizing the lift pump with a pulse of voltage (and current) until a threshold pressure is reached or the lift pump pressure rises may not be the most energy efficient control scheme on which to base pump pulsing. As explained in further detail later, energizing the lift fuel pump for a predetermined time period may be more beneficial to energy-efficient pump operation. Furthermore, the lift pump control scheme depends on sensors such as a pressure sensor to determine when to cease applying voltage to the lift pump (resulting in a voltage pulse of variable duration). As such, continuous and relatively accurate feedback may be needed to ensure reliable operation of the lift fuel pump. Control schemes that do not need feedback (i.e., open loop control) may be more beneficial for more robust pump operation for certain fuel systems.
Thus in one example, the above issues may be at least partially addressed by a method, comprising: operating a lift fuel pump in a pulsed energy mode for a discrete time duration only upon detection of a threshold fuel volume expelled by a direct injection fuel pump positioned downstream of the lift fuel pump; and switching operation of the lift fuel pump to a continuous energy mode when vapor pressure is detected at an inlet of the direct injection fuel pump. In this way, by operating in the pulsed energy mode, energy may be conserved compared to operating entirely in the continuous energy mode. Furthermore, by switching between the two energy modes, robust operation of the lift fuel pump may be provided wherein the continuous mode is activated when vapor is detected, thereby allowing the pump to operate and mitigate the presence of fuel vapor.
In some embodiments, the algorithm for controlling the lift fuel pump may be alternatively implemented by detecting a threshold volume of fuel injected instead of a threshold volume fuel pumped through the direct injection fuel pump. Furthermore, to continuously operate the lift fuel pump until vapor is no longer detected, alternatively this can be implemented by applying a predetermined pulse duration upon detection of vapor and continuously repeating the pulse as long as vapor is detected. As such, this method may include operating the lift fuel pump predominantly via an open loop pulsing scheme, thereby enabling a minimum lift pump energy control scheme that may be backed up with an algorithm that applies lift pump energy if vaporization at the DI pump inlet is detected.
It should be understood that the summary above is provided to introduce in simplified form a selection of concepts that are further described in the detailed description. It is not meant to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, the scope of which is defined uniquely by the claims that follow the detailed description. Furthermore, the claimed subject matter is not limited to implementations that solve any disadvantages noted above or in any part of this disclosure.
The following detailed description provides information regarding a lift fuel pump, its related fuel and engine systems, and several control strategies for energizing the lift fuel pump to pressurize fuel through the fuel system. A simplified schematic diagram of an example direct injection fuel system and engine is shown in
Regarding terminology used throughout this detailed description, a higher-pressure fuel pump, or direct injection fuel pump, that provides pressurized fuel to a direct injection fuel rail attached injectors may be abbreviated as a DI or HP pump. Similarly, a lower-pressure pump (compressing fuel at pressures generally lower than that of the DI pump), or lift fuel pump, that provides pressurized fuel from a fuel tank to the DI pump may be abbreviated as an LP pump. A solenoid spill valve, which may be electronically energized to allow check valve operation and de-energized to open (or vice versa), may also be referred to as a fuel volume regulator, magnetic solenoid valve, and a digital inlet valve, among other names.
Fuel can be provided to the engine 110 via the injectors 120 by way of the direct injection fuel system indicated generally at 150. In this particular example, the fuel system 150 includes a fuel storage tank 152 for storing the fuel on-board the vehicle, a low-pressure fuel pump 130 (e.g., a fuel lift pump), a high-pressure fuel pump or direct injection (DI) pump 140, a fuel rail 158, and various fuel passages 154 and 156. In the example shown in
In the present example of
The low-pressure fuel pump 130 can be operated by a controller 170 to provide fuel to DI pump 140 via fuel low-pressure passage 154. The low-pressure fuel pump 130 can be configured as what may be referred to as a fuel lift pump. As one example, low-pressure fuel pump 130 can include an electric pump motor, whereby the pressure increase across the pump and/or the volumetric flow rate through the pump may be controlled by varying the electrical power provided to the pump motor, thereby increasing or decreasing the motor speed. For example, as the controller 170 reduces the electrical power that is provided to LP pump 130, the volumetric flow rate and/or pressure increase across the pump may be reduced. Alternatively, the volumetric flow rate and/or pressure increase across the pump may be increased by increasing the electrical power that is provided to the pump 130. As one example, the electrical power supplied to the low-pressure pump motor can be obtained from an alternator or other energy storage device on-board the vehicle (not shown), whereby the control system provided by controller 170 can control the electrical load that is used to power the low-pressure pump. Thus, by varying the voltage and/or current provided to the low-pressure fuel pump 130, as indicated at 182, the flow rate and pressure of the fuel provided to DI pump 140 and ultimately to the fuel rail 158 may be adjusted by the controller 170. The operation of the low-pressure fuel pump 130 will be discussed in further detail below with reference to
Low-pressure fuel pump 130 may be fluidly coupled to check valve 104 which may facilitate fuel delivery and maintain fuel line pressure. Filter 106 may be fluidly coupled to outlet check valve 104 via low-pressure passage 154. Filter 106 may remove small impurities that may be contained in the fuel that could potentially damage fuel handling components. With check valve 104 upstream of the filter 106, the compliance of low-pressure passage 154 may be increased since the filter may be physically large in volume. Furthermore, pressure relief valve valve 155 includes a ball and spring mechanism that seats and seals at a specified pressure differential to relieve fuel to limit the fuel pressure at 154. An orifice check valve 157 may be placed in series with an orifice 159 to allow for air and/or fuel vapor to bleed out of the lift pump 130. As seen in
Next, fuel may be delivered from check valve 104 to high-pressure fuel pump (e.g., DI pump) 140. DI pump 140 may increase the pressure of fuel received from the check valve 104 from a first pressure level generated by low-pressure fuel pump 130 to a second pressure level higher than the first level. DI pump 140 may deliver high pressure fuel to fuel rail 158 via high-pressure fuel line 156. Operation of DI pump 140 may be adjusted based on operating conditions of the vehicle in order to provide more efficient fuel system and engine operation. The components of the high-pressure DI pump 140 will be discussed in further detail below with reference to
The DI pump 140 can be controlled by the controller 170 to provide fuel to the fuel rail 158 via the high-pressure fuel passage 156. As one non-limiting example, DI pump 140 may utilize a flow control valve, a solenoid actuated “spill valve” (SV), or fuel volume regulator (FVR) to enable the control system to vary the effective pump volume of each pump stroke. The spill valve, described in more detail in
As depicted in
Further, in some examples, the DI pump 140 may be operated as the fuel sensor 148 to determine the level of fuel vaporization. For example, a piston-cylinder assembly of the DI pump 140 forms a fluid-filled capacitor. As such, the piston-cylinder assembly allows the DI pump 140 to be the capacitive element in the fuel composition sensor. In some examples, the piston-cylinder assembly of the DI pump 140 may be the hottest point in the system, such that fuel vapor forms there first. In such an example, the DI pump 140 may be utilized as the sensor for detecting fuel vaporization, as fuel vaporization may occur at the piston-cylinder assembly before it occurs anywhere else in the system. Other fuel sensor configurations may be possible while pertaining to the scope of the present disclosure.
As shown in
Furthermore, controller 170 may receive other engine/exhaust parameter signals from other engine sensors such as engine coolant temperature, engine speed, throttle position, absolute manifold pressure, emission control device temperature, etc. Further still, controller 170 may provide feedback control based on signals received from fuel sensor 148, pressure sensor 162, and engine speed sensor 164, among others. For example, controller 170 may send signals to adjust a current level, current ramp rate, pulse width of a solenoid valve (SV) of DI pump 140, and the like via connection 184 to adjust operation of DI pump 140. Also, controller 170 may send signals to adjust a fuel pressure set-point of a fuel pressure regulator and/or a fuel injection amount and/or timing based on signals from fuel sensor 148, pressure sensor 162, engine speed sensor 164, and the like. Other sensors not shown in
The controller 170 can individually actuate each of the injectors 120 via a fuel injection driver 122. The controller 170, the driver 122, and other suitable engine system controllers can comprise a control system. While the driver 122 is shown external to the controller 170, in other examples, the controller 170 can include the driver 122 or the controller can be configured to provide the functionality of the driver 122. The controller 170, in this particular example, includes an electronic control unit comprising one or more of an input/output device 172, a central processing unit (CPU) 174, read-only memory (ROM) 176, random-access memory (RAM) 177, and keep-alive memory (KAM) 178. The storage medium ROM 176 can be programmed with computer readable data representing non-transitory instructions executable by the processor 174 for performing the methods described below as well as other variants that are anticipated but not specifically listed. For example, controller 170 may contain stored instructions for executing various control schemes of DI pump 140 and LP pump 130 based on several measured operating conditions from the aforementioned sensors.
As shown in
Although not shown in
DI pump inlet 299 allows fuel to spill valve 212 located along passage 235. Spill valve 212 is in fluidic communication with the low-pressure fuel pump 130 and high-pressure fuel pump 140. Piston 206 reciprocates up and down within compression chamber 208 according to intake and delivery/compression strokes. DI pump 140 is in a delivery/compression stroke when piston 206 is traveling in a direction that reduces the volume of compression chamber 208. Alternatively, DI pump 140 is in an intake/suction stroke when piston 206 is traveling in a direction that increases the volume of compression chamber 208. A forward flow outlet check valve 216 may be coupled downstream of an outlet 204 of the compression chamber 208. Outlet check valve 216 opens to allow fuel to flow from the compression chamber outlet 204 into the fuel rail 158 only when a pressure at the outlet of direct injection fuel pump 140 (e.g., a compression chamber outlet pressure) is higher than the fuel rail pressure. Operation of DI pump 140 may increase the pressure of fuel in compression chamber 208 and upon reaching a pressure set-point, fuel may flow through outlet valve 216 to fuel rail 158. A pressure relief valve 214 may be placed such that the valve limits the pressure in the DI fuel rail 158. Valve 214 may be biased to inhibit fuel from flowing downstream to fuel rail 158 but may allow fuel flow out of the DI fuel rail 158 toward pump outlet 204 when the fuel rail pressure is greater than a predetermined pressure (i.e., pressure setting of valve 214).
The solenoid spill valve 212 may be coupled to compression chamber inlet 203. As presented above, direct injection or high-pressure fuel pumps such as pump 140 may be piston pumps that are controlled to compress a fraction of their full displacement by varying closing timing of the solenoid spill valve. As such, a full range of pumping volume fractions may be provided to the direct injection fuel rail 158 and direct injectors 120 depending on when the spill valve 212 is energized and de-energized. In particular, controller 170 may send a pump signal that may be modulated to adjust the operating state (e.g., open or closed, check valve) of SV 212. Modulation of the pump signal may include adjusting a current level, current ramp rate, a pulse-width, a duty cycle, or another modulation parameter. Mentioned above, controller 170 may be configured to regulate fuel flow through spill valve 212 by energizing or de-energizing the solenoid (based on the solenoid valve configuration) in synchronism with the driving cam 146. Accordingly, solenoid spill valve 212 may be operated in two modes. In a first mode, solenoid spill valve 212 is not energized (deactivated or disabled) to an open position to allow fuel to travel upstream and downstream of a check valve contained in solenoid valve 212. During this mode, pumping of fuel into passage 156 cannot occur as fuel is pumped upstream through de-energized, open spill valve 212 instead of out of outlet check valve 216.
Alternatively, in the second mode, spill valve 212 is energized (activated) by controller 170 to a closed position such that fluidic communication across the valve is disrupted to limit (e.g., inhibit) the amount of fuel traveling upstream through the solenoid spill valve 212. In the second mode, spill valve 212 may act as a check valve which allows fuel to enter chamber 208 upon reaching the set pressure differential across valve 212 but substantially prevents fuel from flowing backward from chamber 208 into passage 235. Depending on the timing of the energizing and de-energizing of the spill valve 212, a given amount of pump displacement is used to push a given fuel volume into the fuel rail 158, thus allowing the spill valve 212 to function as a fuel volume regulator. As such, the timing of the solenoid valve 212 may control the effective pump displacement. Controller 170 of
As such, solenoid spill valve 212 may be configured to regulate the mass (or volume) of fuel compressed into the direct injection fuel pump. In one example, controller 170 may adjust a closing timing of the solenoid spill valve to regulate the mass of fuel compressed. For example, a late spill valve 212 closing may reduce the amount of fuel mass ingested into the compression chamber 208. The solenoid spill valve opening and closing timings may be coordinated with respect to stroke timings of the direct injection fuel pump.
During conditions when direct injection fuel pump operation is not requested, controller 170 may activate and deactivate solenoid spill valve 212 to regulate fuel flow and pressure in compression chamber 208 to a pressure less than the fuel rail pressure during the compression (delivery) stroke. Control of the DI pump 140 in this way may be included in zero flow lubrication (ZFL) methods. During such ZFL operation, on the intake stroke the pressure in compression chamber 208 varies to a pressure near the pressure of the lift pump 130 and just below the fuel rail pressure. Subsequently, the pump pressure rises to a pressure near the fuel rail pressure at the end of the delivery (compression) stroke. If the compression chamber (pump) pressure remains below the fuel rail pressure, zero fuel flow results. When the compression chamber pressure is slightly below the fuel rail pressure, the ZFL operating point has been reached. In other words, the ZFL operating point is the highest compression chamber pressure that results in zero flow rate (i.e., substantially no fuel sent into fuel rail 158). Lubrication of the DI pump's piston-cylinder interface may occur when the pressure in compression chamber 208 exceeds the pressure in step-room 218. This difference in pressures may also contribute to pump lubrication when controller 170 deactivates solenoid spill valve 212. Deactivation of spill valve 212 may also reduce noise produced by valve 212. Said another way, even though the solenoid valve 212 is energized, if the outlet check valve 216 does not open, then the pump 140 may produce less noise than during other operating schemes. One result of this regulation method is that the fuel rail is regulated to a pressure depending on when solenoid spill valve is energized during the delivery stroke. Specifically, the fuel pressure in compression chamber 208 is regulated during the compression (delivery) stroke of direct injection fuel pump 140. Thus, during at least the compression stroke of direct injection fuel pump 140, lubrication is provided to the pump. When the DI pump enters a suction stroke, fuel pressure in the compression chamber may be reduced while still some level of lubrication may be provided as long as the pressure differential remains.
As an example, a zero flow lubrication strategy may be commanded when direct fuel injection is not desired (i.e., requested by the controller 170). When direct injection ceases, pressure in the fuel rail 158 is desired to remain at a near-constant level. As such, the spill valve 212 may be deactivated to the open position to allow fuel to freely enter and exit the pump compression chamber 208 so fuel is not pumped into the fuel rail 158. An always-deactivated spill valve corresponds to a 0% trapping volume, that is, 0 trapped volume or 0 displacement. As such, lubrication and cooling of the DI pump may be reduced while no fuel is being compressed, thereby leading to pump degradation. Therefore, according to ZFL methods, it may be beneficial to energize the spill valve 212 to pump a small amount of fuel when direct injection is not requested. As such, operation of the DI pump 140 may be adjusted to maintain a pressure at the outlet of the DI pump at or below the fuel rail pressure of the direct injection fuel rail, 158 thereby forcing fuel past the piston-bore interface of the DI pump. By maintaining the outlet pressure of the DI pump just below the fuel rail pressure and without allowing fuel to flow out of the outlet of the DI pump into the fuel rail, the DI pump may be kept lubricated, thereby reducing pump degradation. This general operation may be referred to as zero flow lubrication (ZFL).
It is noted here that DI pump 140 of
Various techniques may be used to control the energy input into the lift fuel pump 130 of
The inventors herein have proposed a lift fuel pump control method that involves intermittently providing electrical power to the lift pump according to multiple control modes or schemes. In other words, by providing pulsations of electrical current to the lift fuel pump whenever one or more conditions are met, power may be conserved while at the same time ensuring efficient and reliable pump operation. The pulsations cause the lift pump to produce higher flow rates that may correspond to higher efficiencies compared to continuous operation of the lift pump. Furthermore, the control method may include executing a continuous energy mode when fuel vapor is detected at the inlet of the DI fuel pump, thereby reducing the occurrence of inefficient pump operation with vapor. In some cases, fuel vapor may form when the outlet check valve (valve 104 of
To quantify the energy savings between continuous versus pulsed lift fuel pump operation,
Turning to
With current provided to the LP pump according to the continuous current mode at plot 320, throughout the period of time depicted in
Alternatively, according to the pulsed pump current mode described hereafter, the current may sporadically and temporarily increase for a limited amount of time before returning to another level, such as 0 amps in some examples. As such, the current pulses of the pulsed current mode may be larger than the current fluctuations of plot 320. In between each pulse, substantially no current may be provided to the LP pump. Furthermore, the time in between pulses may change as well as the intensity (i.e., current level) and duration of the pulses. Depending on engine demand and other parameters, these factors and the number of pulses per period of time may change to allow desirable LP pump operation to be maintained according to a pulsed current control scheme. Pulsation events generally result in corresponding increases in the fuel pressure downstream of the LP pump. Furthermore, in between pulsation events when substantially no current provided to the LP pump, the fuel pressure of the LP passage may slightly increase and/or decrease depending on operation of the downstream HP pump 140 as well as loss of fuel from the fuel injectors and other components. It is noted that the shape of the plots of
Referring to
Since the pulsed lift fuel pump only pumps during the pump's on (or operational) time, the fuel flow rate through the lift pump for the on time may be higher than that of the continuous pump energy approach. As such, the current pulses may create increased flow while the continuous current may create lower fuel flow. It is noted that the average fuel flow rate between the continuous and pulsed pump systems may be similar since the flow rate is determined by engine demand.
The inventors herein have recognized that operating the lift fuel pump according to the aforementioned pulsed control mode may reduce energy consumption while increasing robustness over other control modes such as the continuous current mode. The reduction in energy consumption may be at least partially due to the dependence of pump efficiency on flow rate.
Referring to
Referring to
At time t1, when the fuel consumption counter of plot 530 decreases to 0 cc from the preset threshold 532 (3 cc in this case), then a pulsation event is triggered. In some examples, the triggering may involve sending a signal from the fuel consumption counter and associated sensors to controller 170 of
Between times t1 and t2, when substantially no current is sent to the lift pump, the lift pump pressure steadily decreases as fuel is sent through the DI pump and injected into the engine. Furthermore, the fuel consumption counter reactivates and begins measuring the volume of fuel consumed by the engine. Regarding
At time t3, again when the fuel consumption counter of plot 530 reaches the preset threshold 532, another current pulsation event is triggered. Upon triggering the event, the controller 170 sends the appropriate level of current to the lift fuel pump, whereupon the input current of plot 510 rapidly increases. In response to the increase in current that enables the lift pump to produce flow and pressure in the fuel, the pressure of the lift pump (and pressure at the inlet of the DI pump) also increases as seen in plot 520, similar to the increase shown at time t1. Upon expiration of the preset time duration (200 milliseconds), the input current decreases to the initial value such as 0. As such, after time t2 and reduction of the current, the lift pump pressure decreases in a generally linear fashion as fuel is sent into the DI pump. Furthermore, the fuel consumption counter resets at time t2 and starts decreasing as fuel is consumed by the engine. The processes prior to, at, and after times t1 and t2 may be repeated during operation of the vehicle.
As seen in the two pulsation events of times t1 and t2 of
The minimum DI inlet pressure may be governed primarily by fuel temperature. Higher fuel temperatures may require higher minimum DI inlet pressure. In an example operating mode, a single minimum DI inlet pressure is selected. However, a further optimization may be obtained by varying the minimum DI inlet pressure. For example, if the minimum DI inlet pressure was selected as 3 bar, the DI inlet pressure would vary between 3 and 6.4 bar. This could be accomplished by choosing a different fuel volume between pulses and also choosing a different pulse duration. As the minimum pressure is lower, the volume interval between pulses can be extended but the pulse duration could be slightly increased.
Other control schemes such as the continuous lift pump mode may control a computed, variable target pressure for the DI pump inlet and may vary the fuel pressure via pulsing the pump by utilizing data from pressure sensor feedback. The pulsed pump approach, alternatively, may allow the pressure to vary but enforce a minimum DI pump inlet pressure which may optionally be computed and variable. As such, the variable pressure may be attained reliably without the use of low pressure sensor feedback.
At 704, the method includes calculating if the current fuel consumption volume is greater than the threshold fuel consumption volume. If the current volume is less than the threshold volume, then the method returns to 704 and repeats the calculation. Alternatively, if the fuel consumption is greater than the threshold volume, then the method continues to 705. In one example, the threshold volume is 3 cc. At 705, the control scheme includes sending the pulsed current for the preset time duration from the controller to the lift fuel pump. In other words, the current is sent to energize (i.e., activate) the LP pump such that the pump operates for the preset time duration, which may be 200 milliseconds in some examples. As a result of the pulsed current signal, the LP pump may pressurize fuel in the LP fuel passage before the fuel is sent into the DI pump. Finally, at 706, the method includes resetting the fuel consumption counter to the initial value, such as 0. In this way, method 700 may be repeated to determine when the threshold consumed fuel volume has again been reached to activate the LP pump.
If full vehicle voltage is applied to the lift pump, a high peak current may result. As such, if the high peak current is determined to be undesirable, the peak lift pump current (or PEM current) can be reduced via limiting the rate of voltage application during the pulsed energy mode. For example, during this situation, applying 8 volts for 50 milliseconds, then 10 volts for 50 milliseconds, and then 12 volts for 100 milliseconds may be an effective way to limit peak current to be approximately equal to a steady-state current.
The pulsed pump current mode may be operated without the use of a lift pump pressure sensor and without a vapor detection algorithm. In some fuel systems, the pressure sensor may be placed at the outlet of the LP pump while the vapor detection algorithm is used to determine when fuel vaporizes in between the LP and DI pumps. As such, the pulsed current method, as described above, may be executed with open loop control processes. Alternatively, the pressure sensor and vapor detection algorithm may be used with the pulsed current method to provide feedback and diagnostics to the system. Furthermore, the energy (current) pulses sent to the LP pump may be shaped to reduce maximum PEM or motor current in situations where durability of the PEM or motor is better preserved. The preset time duration and fuel consumption volume threshold can be adjusted during engine and fuel system operation. For example, the fuel volume can be decreased if the fuel temperature or fuel volatility increases. As a result, the minimum lift fuel pump pressure (i.e., minimum DI pump inlet pressure) increases. In some embodiments, to add to the robustness of the pulse energy mode, current pulses may also be sent to the LP pump when threshold decreases in LP pump effectiveness or efficiency are detected.
In this way, by pulsing the lift pump when an amount of fuel is consumed, more electrical energy may be saved compared to running the lift pump continuously. However, the inventors herein have recognized that malfunction of the lift pump check valve may impact proper operation during the pulsed energy mode. In particular, when the check valve, such as valve 104 of
In fuel systems that includes a pressure sensor located in low-pressure passage 154 of
In fuel systems that do not include a pressure sensor located in low-pressure passage 154 of
It is noted that as the minimum desired pressure drops that the pressure can range lower. A 0.6 bar per cc compliance may be a fixed constant of the given fuel system design. If the fuel pressure decreases but the maximum pressure is held constant, then the volume grows (i.e., larger than 3 cc). For example, if the fuel pressure decreases an additional 0.6 bar, the volume needs to be increased by 1 cc.
Referring to graph 810, an inferred vapor pressure 815 is labelled, corresponding to a pressure of 4 bar. The inferred vapor pressure 815 may be an estimate based on a variety of parameters, including fuel composition, temperature, volume, flow rate, etc. As it may be desirable to operate the lift pump above the inferred vapor pressure, curve 810 representing the pulsation events of the pulsed energy mode is located above the inferred pressure 815. In this way, while performing normal operation in the pulsed energy mode, the LP fuel passage pressure is maintained above the vapor pressure (4 bar in the present example). Similarly, graph 820 shows normal operation of the lift pump during the pulsed energy mode, but the inferred vapor pressure 825 is different than the inferred vapor pressure 815 of graph 810. In particular, inferred vapor pressure 825 is 3 bar (instead of 4 bar), as seen by the vertical axis labels. As such, the pressure range of graph 820 is lower than the pressure range of graph 810. The pressure range of graph 810 appears to be between about 5 bar and 7 bar, whereas the pressure range of graph 820 appears to be between about 4 bar and 7 bar. In this way, when the inferred vapor pressure is lower, the pulsed energy mode may be implemented such that the range of pressure of the lift pump is higher in order to operate the lift pump above the inferred vapor pressure.
Referring to graph 830, mitigating operation of the lift pump is shown, wherein vapor formation at the inlet of the DI pump or in the LP fuel passage is likely occurring. Compared to graphs 810 and 820 wherein the curves do not intersect the inferred vapor pressure, graph 830 intersects with a line defined as the actual vapor pressure 835. The actual vapor pressure is about 2 bar in the current example. A leftmost portion of graph 830 is referred to as pulsed section 837, wherein the LP pump is pulsed to increase the fuel pressure in order to decrease the formation of fuel vapor. While pulsed section 837 appears similar in shape to graphs 810 and 820, the function of each are different. While graphs 810 and 820 are a result of normal operation of the LP pump according to the pulsed energy mode, graph 830 (and pulsed section 837) is a result of an operating mode that attempts to mitigate vapor formation in the LP fuel passage. Instead of pulsing the pump according to a schedule such as 3 cc (as with graphs 810 and 820), pulsed section 837 sends current pulses to the LP pump to increase fuel pressure above the vapor pressure shown by line 835. Furthermore, the intervals in between subsequent pulsation events are shortened in graph 830 as compared to the intervals of graphs 810 and 820. In addition, the length of pulsation events of graph 830 may be longer than those of graphs 810 and 820, as seen by the horizontal segments in pulsed section 837. It is noted that a minimum DI pump inlet pressure that exceeds the current fuel vapor pressure may be selected by the controller or other suitable device.
Upon completion of a condition such as a volume of fuel consumed while performing the pulsed mitigating action of section 837, a time duration, or a number of pulsation events, operation of the LP pump may switch from the pulsed energy mode to the continuous energy mode, as indicated at transition 838. In another example, the condition may include concluding that the vapor formation is caused by failure of the check valve, when it is stuck in the open position. When transition 838 occurs, a continuous current may be directed to the LP pump during the continuous energy mode as seen through section 839. The continuous energy section maintains a smaller fuel pressure range than the pressure range of pulsed section 837. In particular, the fuel pressure range of pulsed section 837 appears to be about 2 bar to 7 bar, whereas the fuel pressure range of continuous section 839 appears to be about 5.5 bar to 6.5 bar. The elevated pressure of continuous section 839 may reduce vapor formation as well as mitigate the faulty check valve.
In this way, by selectively operating the low-pressure fuel pump (lift pump) via pulsed or continuous energy modes, energy consumption may be optimized while providing robust operation of the lift pump. Different combinations of the pulsed and continuous energy modes may be used to alter operation of the lift pump according to different operating conditions. For example, the pulsed energy mode may be implemented throughout all operating conditions of the lift pump, and further does not include a pressure sensor. In another example, both pulsed and continuous energy modes may be implemented with the use of a pressure sensor for detecting vapor formation to trigger switching between the two modes. Other examples are possible while remaining within the scope of the present disclosure. Furthermore, vapor formation caused by check valve failure may be detected and mitigated while using the pulsed energy mode or a combination of the pulse and continuous energy modes. During the pulsed energy mode, parameters such as the threshold consumed fuel volume and the preset pulse time duration may be continuously adjusted to adapt to changing engine and fuel system demand. This may achieve the technical effect of providing effective lift pump operation during a variety of engine conditions while optimizing (i.e., reducing) energy consumption.
Note that the example control and estimation routines included herein can be used with various engine and/or vehicle system configurations. The control methods and routines disclosed herein may be stored as executable instructions in non-transitory memory. The specific routines described herein may represent one or more of any number of processing strategies such as event-driven, interrupt-driven, multi-tasking, multi-threading, and the like. As such, various actions, operations, and/or functions illustrated may be performed in the sequence illustrated, in parallel, or in some cases omitted. Likewise, the order of processing is not necessarily required to achieve the features and advantages of the example embodiments described herein, but is provided for ease of illustration and description. One or more of the illustrated actions, operations and/or functions may be repeatedly performed depending on the particular strategy being used. Further, the described actions, operations and/or functions may graphically represent code to be programmed into non-transitory memory of the computer readable storage medium in the engine control system.
It will be appreciated that the configurations and routines disclosed herein are exemplary in nature, and that these specific embodiments are not to be considered in a limiting sense, because numerous variations are possible. For example, the above technology can be applied to V-6, I-4, I-6, V-12, opposed 4, and other engine types. The subject matter of the present disclosure includes all novel and non-obvious combinations and sub-combinations of the various systems and configurations, and other features, functions, and/or properties disclosed herein.
The following claims particularly point out certain combinations and sub-combinations regarded as novel and non-obvious. These claims may refer to “an” element or “a first” element or the equivalent thereof. Such claims should be understood to include incorporation of one or more such elements, neither requiring nor excluding two or more such elements. Other combinations and sub-combinations of the disclosed features, functions, elements, and/or properties may be claimed through amendment of the present claims or through presentation of new claims in this or a related application. Such claims, whether broader, narrower, equal, or different in scope to the original claims, also are regarded as included within the subject matter of the present disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7406955 | Gachik | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7640916 | Ulrey et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
8061329 | Pursifull et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20080072880 | Wachtendorf | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090090331 | Pursifull | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090095259 | Pursifull | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090188472 | Ulrey | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20110023833 | Chamarthi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120186560 | Lund | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Surnilla, Gopichandra et al., “Robust Direct Injection Fuel Pump System,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/155,250, filed Jan. 14, 2014, 61 pages. |
Pursifull, Ross D., “System and Method for Operating an Engine Combusting Liquefied Petroleum Gas,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/970,519, filed Aug. 19, 2013, 30 pages. |
Pursifull, Ross D. et al., “High Pressure Fuel Pump Control for Idle Tick Reduction,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/042,971, filed Oct. 1, 2013, 34 pages. |
Pursifull, Ross D., “Method and System for Supplying Liquefied Petroleum Gas to a Direct Fuel Injected Engine,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/532,756, filed Nov. 4, 2014, 39 pages. |
Ulrey, Joseph N. et al., “Optimizing Intermittent Fuel Pump Control,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/558,363, filed Dec. 2, 2014, 44 pages. |
Pursifull, Ross D., “Direct Injection Pump Control,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/560,497, filed Dec. 4, 2014, 49 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160025030 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |