Patent Application
20210387008
This application claims the benefit of Australian Provisional Patent Application No. 2018904014 filed 23 Oct. 2018, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a current source for a current controlled implantable stimulator such as a neurostimulator, and in particular to a current source configured to deliver current pulses simultaneously to more than one electrode.
Electrical neuromodulation is used or envisaged for use to treat a variety of disorders including chronic pain, Parkinson's disease, and migraine, and to restore function such as hearing and motor function. A neuromodulation system applies an electrical pulse to neural tissue in order to generate a therapeutic effect. Such a system typically comprises an implanted electrical pulse generator, and a power source such as a battery that may be rechargeable by transcutaneous inductive transfer. An electrode array is connected to the pulse generator, and is positioned close to the neural pathway(s) of interest. An electrical pulse applied to the neural tissue by an electrode causes the depolarisation of neurons, which generates propagating action potentials whether antidromic, orthodromic, or both, to achieve the therapeutic effect.
When used to relieve chronic pain for example, the electrical pulse is applied to the dorsal column (DC) of the spinal cord and the electrode array is positioned in the dorsal epidural space. The dorsal column fibres being stimulated in this way inhibit the transmission of pain from that segment in the spinal cord to the brain.
In general, the electrical stimulus generated in a neuromodulation system triggers a neural action potential which then has either an inhibitory or excitatory effect. Inhibitory effects can be used to modulate an undesired process such as the transmission of pain, or excitatory effects can be used to cause a desired effect such as the contraction of a muscle or stimulation of a sensory nerve such as the auditory nerve.
Accurately delivering stimuli to a desired location upon a nerve is a key factor in the therapeutic benefit perceived by the implant recipient. For example, some approaches to spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for treating chronic pain seek to induce paraesthesia which covers, or is co-located with, a dermatome or body region associated with the condition being treated. To this end, both the surgical implantation procedure and the post-surgical device fitting process involve considerable efforts to optimise very precisely a location on the spinal cord at which the therapy is to be delivered by the implanted electrode array. Such efforts are however complicated by the physical size of the implanted lead or electrode array. Typical electrode arrays have electrodes which are a number of millimetres wide, and typical inter-electrode spacings are several millimetres or more, for example SCS percutaneous leads commonly have electrodes which are 3 mm wide and which have an inter-electrode spacing of 4 mm, so that the electrode centres are 7 mm apart. Relative to the much smaller differences between positions of nodes of Ranvier in a fibre population of interest, and the small internodal spacing of nodes of Ranvier on each such axon, the large electrode size and large electrode spacings of typical neuromodulation leads provide for relatively poor spatial control over the location at which stimuli can be delivered.
To address this problem, “current steering” or a “virtual electrode” seeks to effectively interpose stimuli delivery to locations between the physical electrodes, by using more than one active stimulus electrode to deliver contemporaneous stimuli which together give the effect of delivering a single stimulus at an apparent location between the electrodes, with the apparent location being defined by, and thus controllable by, the relative magnitude of the contemporaneous stimuli. However, this approach requires multiple duplications of the required hardware for stimulation, such as duplicate current sources and duplicate current control circuitry. Current steering also considerably complicates clinical fitting of the device due to the significant increase in the number of control parameters which must be clinically defined. Current steering also complicates ongoing control of the therapy such as when the implant recipient wishes to adjust the stimulation intensity when making postural changes.
Any discussion of documents, acts, materials, devices, articles or the like which has been included in the present specification is solely for the purpose of providing a context for the present invention. It is not to be taken as an admission that any or all of these matters form part of the prior art base or were common general knowledge in the field relevant to the present invention as it existed before the priority date of each claim of this application.
Throughout this specification the word “comprise”, or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising”, will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated element, integer or step, or group of elements, integers or steps, but not the exclusion of any other element, integer or step, or group of elements, integers or steps.
In this specification, a statement that an element may be “at least one of” a list of options is to be understood that the element may be any one of the listed options, or may be any combination of two or more of the listed options.
According to a first aspect the present invention provides an implantable neurostimulator comprising:
an implantable electrode array comprising a plurality of stimulus electrodes, each stimulus electrode configured to deliver electrical stimuli to neural tissue;
an implantable control module configured to produce the electrical stimuli delivered by the stimulus electrodes, the control module configured to effect current steering and comprising a plurality of related current sources, each current source configured to deliver a respective stimulus current which is defined in a first part by a shared current control signal which is shared by each of the related current sources, and which is defined in a second part by a respective unique current control signal which is not shared by all of the related current sources.
According to a second aspect the present invention provides a method of current steering, comprising:
generating a plurality of contemporaneous stimuli by controlling a respective plurality of current sources, each current source configured to deliver a respective stimulus current which is defined in a first part by a shared current control signal which is shared by each of the related current sources, and which is defined in a second part by a respective unique current control signal which is not shared by all of the related current sources; and
delivering the contemporaneous stimuli to neural tissue via an implantable electrode array comprising a plurality of stimulus electrodes.
According to a further aspect the present invention provides a computing device configured to carry out the method of the second aspect. According to a further aspect the present invention provides a non-transitory computer readable medium for current steering, comprising instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes performance of the method of the second aspect.
The present invention thus provides for the plurality of current sources to have a portion of their operation in common, as defined and controlled by the shared current control signal. The present invention recognises that current steering can be beneficially addressed by utilising both a shared current control signal and respective unique current control signals. The shared current control signal can then be used as a single control parameter to effect adjustments in net stimulation intensity, as may be required when the implant recipient changes posture. This aspect of the present invention is particularly important in embodiments which measure the evoked neural response and use such measurements for automated feedback control of the stimulation intensity, as the feedback loop speed is minimally hampered by a single intensity control parameter and a higher stimulation rate and/or feedback rate can thus be supported.
In some embodiments, a majority of the operation of each current source is controlled by the shared current control signal. For example, for digitally controlled current sources, a majority of a set of control bits used to control each current source may be defined by the shared current control signal. In some such embodiments, at least the most significant half of the control bits are defined by the shared current control signal, with the remaining least significant bits being defined by the respective unique current control signal.
In one embodiment, the 12 most significant bits of a 16 bit current source are defined by the shared current control signal, and the remaining 4 least significant bits are defined by the respective unique current control signal. Such embodiments recognise that for 16 bit control providing 4, or about 4, of the least most significant bits of control to the respective unique current control signal permits sufficiently fine spatial resolution for current steering, so that the virtual electrode can be selectively positioned at a large number of locations between the active stimulus electrodes in use. Moreover, such embodiments recognise that providing 12, or so, bits of control to the shared current control signal provides for a suitably large control range of net stimulation intensity, as is typically required in the SCS field in particular due to the large effect that electrode to nerve distance, and patient movement, can have on recruitment.
In some embodiments of the invention, four or more related current sources are provided. Such embodiments are particularly advantageous in permitting the use of current steering to position an apparent location of stimulation between electrodes in both a caudorostral direction and also between electrodes in a mediolateral direction, for example when a paddle lead with electrodes distributed in a two dimensional array is in use, or when two adjacent linear (one dimensional) array leads are in use.
In some embodiments current sources can be respectively assigned to each respective stimulus electrode and may have 4-bit control over their relative amplitude in steps of 1/16 where each step effects a multiplier of 0.0625 so that step 16/16 effects a multiplier of 1.0. In such embodiments, a single shared 12-bit digital to analog converter (DAC) is further provided in order to deliver the master current, so that the respective 4 bit current sources all provide a scaled version of the master current from the 12 bit DAC. The master current is thus a single parameter which can be controlled by a clinician, by a patient or by a feedback loop. Thus, between the shared DAC which provides 12 bit control and the local DACs each providing a further 4 bits of control, 16 bits of control of each current source are provided of which 12 bits are in common and four bits are independent, with a majority of the control bits being in common.
In some embodiments of the invention, the related current sources can each be switchably connected to a selected one active stimulus electrode selected from a set of more than one available stimulus electrodes, to facilitate a device fitting process which includes selection of a subset of available electrodes for use for example to optimise dermatome selection or the like.
It is to be understood that neurostimulation requires a return path for delivered stimuli, and that a single return electrode may be shared between more than one active stimulus electrode. In alternative embodiments, each active stimulus electrode may be provided with an associated return or ground electrode. In such embodiments of the invention each return electrode may be provided with an associated return current source configured to effect return current steering. The return current sources may control each return electrode to return a respective return current which is defined in part by a shared return current control signal which is shared by each of the related return current sources, and which is defined in part by a respective unique return current control signal which is not shared by all of the related return current sources Moreover, the selection of return electrode(s) may be adaptive and/or configurable in order to further refine and control current steering and the perceived location of stimulation.
Additionally or alternatively, the or each return electrode may be connected directly to a power supply reference, such as a voltage supply rail. Such embodiments may be particularly advantageous in instances where it is desired to obtain a measurement of an ECAP evoked by the stimulus, as the stimulus artefact resulting from a known return electrode voltage can be predicted and compensated for, whereas the return electrode voltage is typically more difficult to predict and compensate for when a return current source is used and is imperfectly matched to the supply current source.
Still further embodiments may provide for a return current source to be provided for the or each return electrode, and may provide for a current value of the return current source to be controlled relative to the current value of the supply source so as to selectively define a resultant tissue voltage, so that a stimulus artefact resulting from a known return electrode voltage can be predicted and compensated for.
Embodiments of the present invention may thus be particularly useful in feedback control of neurostimulation, using ECAP measurements as the feedback variable. It is noted that a stimulation map is typically composed of a set of timing behaviours that specify aspects such as which electrodes are connected together during shorting and the order of events in the stimulation cycle, a set of parametric constants that specify aspects such as how long after each stimulus the first stage of an ECAP measurement amplifier should be blanked, and also a set of therapeutic variables that a clinician would normally change or set while programming a patient in order to optimise the selection of electrodes and the current steering between those electrodes and in order to define minimum and maximum stimulus levels and the like. Thus, applying feedback control to such a complex stimulation map is not always trivial, particularly given that stimulation occurs rapidly (e.g. in the tens or hundreds or thousands of Hz, or greater) and implant processing power, clock rates and battery capacity are limited which places significant constraints on feedback complexity. The solution of the present invention, of providing a shared current control signal which is shared by each of the related current sources, is thus particularly important in maintaining the ability to adjust a single parameter by feedback to effect a partial degree and preferably a large degree of common control over multiple current sources even as they continue to effect current steering.
According to another aspect the present invention provides an implantable neurostimulator comprising:
an implantable electrode array comprising at least one stimulus electrode and at least one return electrode, each electrode configured to deliver electrical stimuli to neural tissue;
an implantable control module configured to produce the electrical stimuli delivered by the stimulus electrodes, the control module comprising at least one current injection current source configured to, in a first stimulus phase, pass a first current from a first supply rail to the stimulus electrode, and the control module further configured to connect the return electrode to a second supply rail during the first phase;
and the control module further comprising at least one current extraction current source configured to, in a second phase, pass a second current from the stimulus electrode to the second supply rail, and the control module further configured to connect the return electrode to the first supply rail during the second phase.
An example of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Module controller 116 has an associated memory 118 storing patient settings 120, control programs 122 and the like. Controller 116 controls a pulse generator 124 to generate stimuli in the form of current pulses in accordance with the patient settings 120 and control programs 122. Electrode selection module 126 switches the generated pulses to the appropriate electrode(s) of electrode array 150, for delivery of the current pulse to the tissue surrounding the selected electrode(s). For simplicity
Delivery of an appropriate stimulus to the nerve 180 evokes a neural response comprising a compound action potential which will propagate along the nerve 180 as illustrated, for therapeutic purposes which in the case of a spinal cord stimulator for chronic pain might be to create paraesthesia at a desired location. To this end the stimulus electrodes are used to deliver stimuli at 30 Hz. To fit the device, a clinician applies stimuli which produce a sensation that is experienced by the user as a paraesthesia. Current steering, described in more detail in the following, is used to identify an optimal location at which to apply such stimuli. When the paraesthesia is in a location and of a size which is congruent with the area of the user's body affected by pain, the clinician nominates that configuration for ongoing use.
The device 100 is further configured to sense the existence and electrical profile of compound action potentials (CAPs) propagating along nerve 180, whether such CAPs are evoked by the stimulus from electrodes 2 and 4, or otherwise evoked. To this end, any electrodes of the array 150 may be selected by the electrode selection module 126 to serve as measurement electrode 6 and measurement reference electrode 8. The stimulator case may also be used as a measurement electrode or reference electrode, or as a stimulation electrode or return electrode. Signals sensed by the measurement electrodes 6 and 8 are passed to measurement circuitry 128, which for example may operate in accordance with the teachings of International Patent Application Publication No. WO2012155183 by the present applicant, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference. The present invention recognises that in circumstances such as shown in
An additional set of return current sources 422, 424, 426, 428, also referred to as cathodic drivers, are referenced to a ground rail GND.
Current sources 412, 414, 416, 418, 422, 424, 426, 428 may each be selectably connected to any one respective electrode of the electrode array 150, by appropriately configuring each switch within the switch array 430 within electrode selection module 126.
In one embodiment the implant 100 has 24 epidural electrodes, of which only 3 are shown in
As further shown in
Another aspect of the invention is illustrated in
The GDAC 610 has 12-bit control, of which 9 bits are monotonic. Each LDAC 620 has 4-bit control with 16 steps. There is one GDAC 610 for all four current source pairs, and four LDACs, one LDAC for each current source pair. The resolution of the LDAC is chosen as a small value, namely 4 bits, in order to simplify the design and cost. The present invention recognises that 4 bits of local control is adequate for field shaping, despite not being adequate for control of the current for general use. In this regard the currents from the electrodes therefore depend on the GDAC value to provide useful general function, such as for amplitude control in response to posture changes. The GDAC 610 and the LDAC multipliers go from 2−n to 1.0. The arrangement of
When there is a single stimulating electrode or fewer than four stimulating electrodes, either an individual current source may be used for the or each stimulating electrode, or multiple current sources may be used to drive a single stimulating electrode by switching each such current source output to that electrode's rail in the switch array 430. Such embodiments may be particularly advantageous in patients for whom the desired currents are high (6.25 mA to 50 mA), as in such cases it is preferable to use multiple current sources to reduce loss of compliance voltage. When currents are low, it is preferable to use a single current source. Tables 1˜4 below show the range of currents and recommended number of current sources in each case, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention.
In accordance with the present invention, more than one stimulus electrode can be utilised to simultaneously deliver respective stimuli components, so that the plurality of stimulus electrodes collectively form what is referred to herein as a virtual electrode. The DACs are organized so that the implant can provide virtual electrodes of any arrangement permitted by configuring the switch array 430, with each such virtual electrode consisting of the combined effect of up to four independent stimulating electrodes. When creating a virtual electrode, the current delivered to each physical electrode can be selected to 4-bit accuracy by controlling the respective LDAC 620 for each electrode. The present invention recognises that 4 bit accuracy permits the virtual electrode to be selectively located at a virtual location which may be between the actual electrodes, and may be so located to a sufficient degree of accuracy under 4-bit control.
Moreover, by providing the GDAC in the described manner, the present invention advantageously also permits the GDAC to be used as a single feedback control variable in a feedback loop. The feedback loop may be based on measurements of evoked compound action potentials, and may for example operate in accordance with the teachings of one or more of International Patent Publication WO2012155188, International Patent Publication WO2016090436 and International Patent Publication WO2017173493, by the present Applicant, the contents of each being incorporated herein by reference. In such a feedback loop, the controlled variable drives the global DAC 610 and the local DACs can each remain static, significantly simplifying the implementation of such a feedback loop.
The implant fitting process, as for example may be saved into firmware, should specify a single LDAC setting as part of a therapy map suitable for the patient concerned.
The GDAC value is a single value for each stimulus. Upon completion of each measurement phase (e.g
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that numerous variations and/or modifications may be made to the invention as shown in the specific embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as broadly described. The present embodiments are, therefore, to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not limiting or restrictive.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018904014 | Oct 2018 | AU | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/AU2019/051163 | 10/23/2019 | WO | 00 |
