The present application claims priority from Australian Provisional Patent No. 2013900349 filed Feb. 4, 2013, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Field of the Technology
The present technology relates to one or more of the diagnosis, treatment and amelioration of respiratory disorders, and to procedures to prevent respiratory disorders. In particular, the present technology relates to medical devices, and their use for treating respiratory disorders and for preventing respiratory disorders. Such devices may include an interface for directing a treatment to a patient respiratory system.
Description of the Related Art and of the Problem to be Solved
Traditional Full Face mask (also referred to as a patient interface) obtains a seal with the user's face by way of a silicone cushion that seals both over the mouth and over the bridge of the nose. The main issue with this is that, due to the nature of the silicon material, often comfort issues are experienced by the user (i.e. facial markings, sores, allergic reaction).
This problem seems to be overcome by the use of foam. The compliant nature of foam allows it to, under relatively small tension force, compress into intricate facial features and affect a good seal. This, combined with the easy adaptability and softness experienced by the patient, provides for a relative fast and easy mask set-up. The foam also exhibits better breathability than silicone. Thus, the use of foam is associated with better cooling and reduced discomfort in the areas of contact in the sealing areas.
In order to achieve comfortable fit, a good seal and stability, current Full Face Foam masks are larger in footprint when compared to masks with traditional silicone seals.
To obtain the correct flow characteristics the foam being currently used is either not permeable or has a secondary layer over the foam to stop air from passing through the foam. Both options remove the breathability benefit of a foam seal. It should be noted that only foam full face masks having sealed or non-permeable foam cushions are compatible with current OSA respiratory therapy.
Some prior foam masks also involve separate individual components that together form the cushion. In one example, a foam layer may be attached to a silicon cushion to improve the sealing quality and the comfort associated with the mask. Such arrangements, apart from being large in size and less comfortable, also make it more difficult for the user to disassemble, assemble and clean the mask.
Some related prior art documents include: WO2007133332; WO2008070929; WO2009109004; WO2009108994; WO2010028425; WO2004041342; US 2008 0257354; WO2010148453; US_2012_0204879_A1; EP2213324 A1.
A foam cushion assembly is designed to seal around the mouth and over the nasal bridge, which achieves a comfortable and effective seal, as shown in
In terms of comfort, the force applied to the user's face from the headgear and the treatment pressure from the seal interface is distributed over a larger surface area compared to traditional silicone based seals, resulting in better comfort.
Any leak is dispersed over a wider area resulting in a more dispersed flow, which minimise “jetting” of conventional silicone cushions.
Some key benefits include:
A breathable foam cushion assembly is designed which cools and reduces discomfort in sealing areas.
The footprint of the mask is reduced with the inclusion of the soft clip.
A soft clip allows a reduced overall dimension in the foam component of the cushion which increases stability without a compromise in comfort and sealing.
A foam cushion assembly that is relatively small in size, unobtrusive, yet easily removable for cleaning and replacement.
In one embodiment, the cushion defines a single chamber that covers the patient's mouth and nose (approximately midway up the nasal bridge). The cushion has a substantially triangular or pear-like shape with a sealing face that follows the contours of a user's face. The single chamber foam cushion is designed to be attached to a first (soft) clip that that is itself attached to a second, more-rigid, clip (as shown in
In one embodiment the foam, soft clip and rigid clip are formed together or permanently attached, as shown in
It should be noted the components of the cushion assembly—the foam cushion, the soft clip and the more rigid clip can be permanently attached in one integral assembly. However, this does not have to be the case and they can represent separate elements, as shown in
The mechanisms of such removable attachment are well known in the art and may include adhesive layers (for attaching the foam to the soft clip), interference fits and snap-locking engagements. The periphery of the more flexible components, such as the flexible clip, can also be stretched over the periphery of the more rigid component, such as the frame or the rigid clip.
Any combination of the three components is possible and alternative design variants could include a cushion assembly comprising only a foam cushion; a foam cushion and a soft clip or a foam cushion and a hard clip.
Sealing Mechanism
The seal around the mouth, the sides of the nose and the nasal bridge is produced through the interaction between the patient's face and the combined reaction of the frame (which is applied to the cushion assembly by way of the hard clip); the soft clip and the foam cushion, to the headgear tension. Details of these three components are discussed below. These components when assembled together work in unison to provide variable amounts of foam compression around the nose and mouth so that an effective seal is produced in these areas. The following sketch illustrates the mechanism that is created to, through the combination of these three components, achieve seal.
The sealing mechanism can be summarized through the following statements (refer to the illustration
Foam Details—
In this embodiment the foam has a varying cross section from the bridge of the nose to the bottom of the mouth, and is symmetric through the center plane. It should be noted the geometry of the foam is affected by, the anthropometric data used in the overall design of the soft clip and the specification of the foam material (ie hardness).
The varying cross section can be divided into three regions, nasal bridge, sides of nose and mouth, with a smooth transition between each of the regions. Each section is designed with a profile that is optimized for the specific are of the phase it seals with.
The cross section of the foam is designed to take into account of the following, and the geometry is design to address each of the areas.
Comfort
Seal
Stability
Encroachment
Foam Cross Sections
Nasal Bridge Region—
Side of Nose Region—
Mouth Region—
Other possible geometries include the following:
Possible Foam Cross Sections—
Material
The foam can be made with (but is not limited to) or a combination of the following: Polyethylene, Polyurethane, EVA
Manufacture
The current embodiment of the foam is produced via compression cutting, but it could be produced via or a combination of the following methods including,
The foam is compression cut to a flat profile as illustrated below. In this flat profile, the foam's shape is somewhat two dimensional, as its shape is mainly defined in two dimensions, but is planar in the third dimension. Once the foam is attached to the soft clip, it not only changes its two-dimensional shape, but also bends in the third plane (dimension) and becomes truly 3-dimensional. In this configuration, the foam is held to its contoured shape by the soft clip, as shown in
Assembly Method—
The foam can be assembled onto the soft clip with
Soft Clip Details—
As can be seen from the clip cross-section illustrated in
The soft clip has a generally inwardly open (or concave) cross-section that varies in shape, but can generally be described as L or C, or even Z-shaped, with the opening being directed inwardly towards the center of the mask. The open or concave cross-section allows the pressure inside the mask chamber to be applied to the rear side of the cushion in a way that enhances the sealing. The support portion 2 is generally perpendicular to the sealing plane 5 (for example—see the C-shaped cross section and its respective support portion 2 in
A minimum height of about 5 mm is required in the soft clip to allow for sufficient movement during usage, so the user does not “bottom out” on the soft clip. (“bottoming out” occurs when the soft clip has reach its deflection limits and there is a sharp rise in the tension force acting on the user's face and experienced by the user) The height can very substantially within a range of about 5 mm to 30 mm, depending on the area of the face covered by the clip.
As discussed above, the two main active portions of the clip are shown in
As shown in
In this embodiment, as shown in
A location ridge, shown as region 3 in
The different cross section in the various portions of the clip is intended to impart different properties to the associated sections of the mask and allow efficient sealing with the respective regions of the user's face, as described in detail below.
Nasal Bridge—
The cross section in this region is “C” shaped and is designed to allow the foam to move substantially perpendicularly to the user's face to accommodate a wide range of nasal bridge depth. It forms the softest part of the soft-clip and has a thickness (support portion 2) of 1 mm (with a range of 0.25-1.5 mm). The movement is generated by the angle between the inner face (in this case 45°) (with a range 0° to 90°) and the overall size of the “C” section.
The surface that attaches to the foam (lip 1) is the largest in this area (15 mm) (range of 10-25 mm), this is done to reduce the likelihood of the seal from blowing out on the sides of the nose, as it restricts the outward movement of the soft clip in the this region.
It's the combination of these values which define the overall sealing and comfort quality.
Sides of Nose—
Sides of Mouth—
Bottom of Mouth—
In the current embodiment a lip seal is used between the soft clip and the mask frame to ensure a seal is maintained between the two components. The lip seal is part of the soft clip.
The interface between the rigid clip and the Mask frame is shown in
The performance characteristics (how it behaves under load, ie increase/decrease in sealing force) can be altered in the individual sections of the soft clip by modifying the following.
Materials
The soft clip is made from an elastic material that will deform under load. This includes but is not limited to, silicone, TPE, TPU and natural rubbers.
TPE material is preferred as it has a higher potential to be adhered to/moulded to the foam.
Manufacture
The manufacturing process of the soft clip is injection moulding, where it can be moulded in the following manner:
Depending on the manufacturing process, if the soft clip is manufactured as a separate component, it could be assembled to the hard clip via:
Hard Clip Details—
The main purposes of the hard clip are:
Materials
The hard clip can be made of a rigid thermoplastic material, such as but is not limited to ABS, Nylon, Polycarbonate.
Manufacture
The preferred manufacturing process is injection moulding.
Although the invention herein has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and applications of the present invention. It is therefore to be understood that numerous modifications may be made to the illustrative embodiments and that other arrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2013900349 | Feb 2013 | AU | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4323063 | Fisichella | Apr 1982 | A |
4782832 | Trimble et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4803981 | Vickery | Feb 1989 | A |
4944310 | Sullivan | Jul 1990 | A |
4945907 | Tayebi | Aug 1990 | A |
5429683 | Le Mitouard | Jul 1995 | A |
5662101 | Ogden | Sep 1997 | A |
6196223 | Belfer et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6532959 | Berthon-Jones | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6581594 | Drew et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
7152602 | Bateman et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7448386 | Ho et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
D582546 | Fujiura et al. | Dec 2008 | S |
7472703 | Hernandez et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7546837 | Busch | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7575006 | Schegerin | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7708017 | Davidson et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
8028699 | Ho et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8220459 | Davidson et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8347886 | Ho et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
D693460 | Rothermel et al. | Nov 2013 | S |
D693462 | Rothermel et al. | Nov 2013 | S |
8701667 | Ho et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8869797 | Davidson et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
D751188 | Skipper et al. | Mar 2016 | S |
D769440 | Amarasinghe et al. | Oct 2016 | S |
20020029780 | Frater | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030168063 | Gambone et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050199242 | Matula et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050257792 | Wixey et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060118117 | Berthon-Jones et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070006879 | Thornton | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070044804 | Matula, Jr. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070125385 | Ho et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070125386 | Quinn | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070145534 | Murakami | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070215161 | Frater | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080257354 | Davidson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090014007 | Brambilla et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090044808 | Guney et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090050156 | Ng et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090139525 | Schirm | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090255542 | Ugai et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100000534 | Kooij et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100028425 | Mehta et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100108072 | D'Souza et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100319700 | Ng et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326445 | Veliss | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110005524 | Veliss et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110088698 | Barnett et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110146684 | Wells | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110209701 | Derringer et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120080035 | Guney et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120090617 | Matula, Jr. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120204879 | Cariola | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120204881 | Davidson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120222680 | Eves | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130104902 | Ho et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130133664 | Startare | May 2013 | A1 |
20130199537 | Formica et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130306077 | Greenberg | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140216462 | Law et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140224253 | Law | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140261435 | Rothermel | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140290663 | Rothermel | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140311496 | Rothermel | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150000671 | Frerichs et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150328423 | Siew et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160325067 | Harwood et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0288937 | Nov 1988 | EP |
0288938 | Nov 1988 | EP |
0427474 | May 1991 | EP |
2213324 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2428241 | Mar 2012 | EP |
2385533 | Aug 2003 | GB |
M253360 | Dec 2004 | TW |
I357340 | Feb 2012 | TW |
9709090 | Mar 1997 | WO |
19980004310 | Feb 1998 | WO |
19980034665 | Aug 1998 | WO |
9925410 | May 1999 | WO |
20000078381 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0195965 | Dec 2001 | WO |
2004007010 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004041342 | May 2004 | WO |
2004073778 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2005063328 | Jul 2005 | WO |
20060074513 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006130903 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007009182 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007133332 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008011682 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008011683 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008070929 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2009052560 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009108994 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009109004 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2010028425 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010148453 | Dec 2010 | WO |
20100135785 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011060479 | May 2011 | WO |
2012177152 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2016054692 | Apr 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report & Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/AU2014/000077 dated Apr. 23, 2014. |
Taiwan Search Report for Taiwanese Application No. 103103848 dated Jan. 11, 2017. |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP14746612 dated Sep. 26, 2016. |
Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-555500 Office Action dated Dec. 8, 2017. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/765,492 dated May 2, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140216462 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |