The present invention generally relates to handles for use with devices intended to be grasped in a user's hand, and more particularly to a handle portion of a hand tool.
There has been continued innovation and improvement in the design of tool handles, particularly with regard to the tactile properties of tool handles. Examples of such tool handles are those produced under the Bosch®, Skil® or Dremel® brands by the Robert Bosch Tool Corporation of Chicago, Ill. The tool handles are generally cylindrical or elliptical in shape and have a plurality of grooves to promote comfortable ergonomic grasping by a user's hand.
The configuration of tool handles and the manner in which they are manufactured has been the subject of continuing efforts for decades to provide a simple and effective tool handle that enhances gripping properties while simultaneously imparting cushioning properties to the tool handle to promote a softer, more ergonomic tool handle.
The present invention is related to handle portions of hand tools that enhance gripping properties while simultaneously imparting flexibility and cushioning properties to the tool handle portion to promote a softer, more ergonomic tool handle portion.
Typically, tool handles such as those disposed on conventional drills, drywall screwdrivers, circular saws or sanders, to name a few, include a generally cylindrical or elliptical body around which a user wraps his fingers to grasp and operate the tool. To enhance the user's ability to more firmly grasp the tool, conventional grips for tool handles frequently include a configuration having a plurality of depressions or grooves that help prevent slippage of the user's fingers during use.
Additionally, tool handles are often manufactured to include two composite structures: a hard base material and a softer grip material that is bonded thereto. An example of such a tool handle is the hammer drill produced under the Bosch® brand by the Robert Bosch Tool Corporation of Chicago, Ill. First a base is formed, typically of nylon or urethane, wherein the base is a generally elliptical tube having a plurality of depressions. Next, a softer grip material is injected into the depressions. For example, the softer grip material may be a thermal plastic elastomer such as urethane or Santoprene®, which is manufactured by Advanced Elastomer Systems in Akron, Ohio. Thus, the depressions within the nylon base serve as basins for receiving the thermal plastic elastomer. However, because the thermal plastic elastomer is confined at a bottom surface opposite the gripping surface, there is limited flexibility as the thermal plastic elastomer is compressed into the bottom surface of the nylon base.
Turning now to
The support structure 12 is comprised of a relatively rigid material, such as nylon, rubber or urethane, and is configured to provide a volume around which the user's hand can grip with the user's thumb, palm and fingers in contact with cushion structure 16 surrounding the volume. By using a relatively rigid material, the support structure 12 imparts structural strength to the handle portion 10. While the support structure 12 assumes a predetermined configuration, the predetermined configuration may vary to suit individual applications. However, in general, the support structure 12 preferably includes a generally elliptical body 18 having a top surface 20, a bottom surface 21 and the at least one window 14. Alternatively, the body 18 may have a generally cylindrical shape, such as side handle 22 of the hammer drill illustrated in
Unlike the prior art, the windows 14 of the instant invention completely penetrate a depth of the body 18 so that the windows lack bottom surfaces, thus being open to a center of the handle portion 10. Thus, when the cushion structure 16 is bonded thereto, the support structure 12 acts as a skeletal scaffold for the handle portion 10.
Like the support structure 12, the predetermined size and configuration of the cushion structure 16 varies to suit individual applications. The cushion structure 16 is composed of an elastic substance, typically a thermal plastic elastomer such as Santoprene® or urethane, so that the cushion structure imparts flexibility and cushioning properties to the handle portion 10. The composite material of the cushion structure 16 may vary insofar as the composite material of the support structure 12 and the composite material of the cushion structure have adhesive properties that allow chemical bonding between the two structures.
For example, one ideal material is obtained via a process used by Trostel, Ltd., wherein urethane is injected into a mold, thereby forming a cushion layer having an outer surface layer that is typically smooth but may be textured, while inner layers form a microcellular material that foams underneath the outer surface. The foamed inner surface creates a soft cushion material that may be included in the cushion structure 16 of the various embodiments of the present invention.
The thickness of the cushion structure 16 may vary, thereby imparting relatively more or less flexibility to the handle portion 10. The cushion structure 16 of the present tool handle portion 10 contemplates varying thicknesses to suit individual applications, but preferably includes a cushion structure 16 having a thickness from between 2 mm and 25 mm. Additionally, the cushion structure 16 may not have a uniform thickness throughout, but may include local maximum and minimum thickness values. For example, the cushion structure 16 may be formed to have an arched cross section, which may result in a cushion structure that is thicker at predetermined radii when measured from a longitudinal axis of the tool handle portion 10.
As illustrated in
Just as the thickness may vary, the configuration of the cushion structure 16 may also vary, though it has a predetermined configuration that generally compliments the predetermined configuration of the support structure 12. The cushion structure 16 may be configured to promote flexibility and cushioning properties by changing the thickness of the cushion structure or increasing or decreasing the size of the support structure 12 underlying the cushion structure. This will increase or decrease the relative flexibility and cushioning properties of the handle portion 10.
Thus, in operation, a manufacturer would first determine the locations on the handle portion 10 where flexibility is desired, and the degree of flexibility that is desired at those locations. Typically, the locations on the handle portion 10 wherein cushion and flexibility would be desired are those locations where the user's hand will contact the handle portion with his thumb, palm and fingers. The handle portion 10 is then manufactured accordingly using an injection molding process that is known in the art. Preferably, the handle portion 10 is injected molded through a two-shot process, with the support structure 12 being formed with a first shot and the cushion structure 16 being formed with a second shot.
As those skilled in the art will appreciate, tool handles are frequently manufactured by forming two separate handle halves, and then coupling the handle halves to one another via snap-fit or other mating engagement. Therefore, the instant invention may preferably include multiple molds for creating separate halves of the handle portion 10 that will ultimately be assembled to one another to form a single handle portion. Using a mold or molds having a predetermined configuration, the support structure 12 is formed to have a corresponding predetermined configuration and a predetermined number of windows 14. Subsequently, a second mold is used to inject the cushion structure 16 over the support structure 12. In this manner, the cushion structure 16 is formed over an external surface of the support structure 12 and within the windows 14 of the support structure to be complimentary with the support structure. Depending on the degree of flexibility desired by the manufacturer, as well as aesthetic and tactile considerations, the cushion structure 16 may be confined to the windows 14 of the support structure 12 leaving the support structure exposed, or may overlay and obscure the support structure. Thus, when finished, the support structure 12 may not be visible underneath the cushion structure 16.
Together with varying the configuration of the cushion structure 16, varying the configuration of the support structure 12 will increase or decrease flexibility of the cushion structure. Ultimately, an inverse relationship emerges between the cushion structure 16 and the support structure 12. For example, if numerous windows 14 are provided in the support structure 12, the support structure will be more porous, dedicating more of the outer area of the volume of the support structure to the cushion structure 16 injected therein. If the windows 14 are few in number, there will be less surface area dedicated to the cushion structure 16. In the same manner, varying the size of the windows 14 will also vary the flexibility of the tool handle portion 10. The larger the window 14, the larger the cushion structure 16, which enhances flexibility. Generally, the greater the ratio of cushion structure 16 surface area to support structure 12 surface area, the more flexible the tool handle portion 10 will be once formed.
Separating windows 14 by ribs 23 of varying thicknesses will additionally vary the flexibility of the tool handle portion 10. For example, if the ribs 23 separating the windows 14 are relatively narrow, flexibility will increase, whereas widening or increasing a cross sectional area of the ribs will commensurately decrease flexibility of the tool handle portion 10.
The embodiment illustrated in
Still another embodiment is illustrated in
Another possible configuration for the tool handle portion 10 of the instant invention is illustrated in
Conversely,
The instant invention is contemplated for use with a variety of tools, and as such, is uniquely adaptable to applications requiring differing degrees of flexibility. For example, a hammer drill is used in applications such as drilling in concrete. As such, there is a large amount of linear vibration that is translated to the user's hands. In this instance, added cushion, comfort and flexibility is optimum. Thus, the tool handle portion 10 of the hammer drill might preferably be configured to maximize the cushion and flexibility of the cushion structure 16 by decreasing the size of the support structure 12, increasing the size of the cushion structure, minimizing the number of windows 14, decreasing the depth of the cushion structure, or a combination of each.
In contrast, a tool such as a circular saw disperses the vibrational forces in a multi-directional manner, thereby minimizing the vertical vibration in the user's hand. Accordingly, minimal cushion and flexibility is needed in this application, which can be achieved by configuring the tool handle portion 10 to have smaller and more numerous windows 14, increases the overall size of the support structure 12, increase the number of ribs 23 intersecting the cushion structure 16, decreasing the overall size of the cushion structure, increasing the depth of the cushion structure, or a combination of each.
For example, in the embodiments illustrated in
Additionally, the cushion structure 12 may optionally be configured to envelop the second support structure 36. Thus, the cushion structure 16 itself may be configured to engage the support structure 12. In an embodiment wherein the cushion structure 16 envelopes the second support structure 36, the removable cushion structure 16 would prevent the second support structure from directly contacting the support structure 12, which further insulates the tool handle 10 from vibrational forces.
However, while
To promote proper alignment and engagement of the cushion structure 16 over the support structure 12, the cushion structure may include at least one locator pin 42 while the support structure may include a corresponding locator recess 44 that is sized and configured to receive the at least one locator pin. To enhance alignment, the support structure 12 and cushion structure 16 may optionally include a plurality of locator recesses 44 and locator pins 42, respectively. Thus, the predetermined configuration of the locator pins 42 and locator recesses 44 further promotes predetermined alignment of the cushion structure 16 with the support structure 12 as the two structures matingly engage one another.
While a particular embodiment of the present cushion grip handle has been described herein, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the invention in its broader aspects and as set forth in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
604706 | Wiens et al. | May 1898 | A |
3185001 | Viator | May 1965 | A |
3189069 | Stowell | Jun 1965 | A |
3340914 | Ricks | Sep 1967 | A |
3565351 | Ross et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
4331193 | Tudisco et al. | May 1982 | A |
4347648 | Dekkers | Sep 1982 | A |
4721021 | Kusznir | Jan 1988 | A |
4738166 | Yamaguchi | Apr 1988 | A |
4739536 | Bandera et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4768406 | Fitzwater | Sep 1988 | A |
4837892 | Lo | Jun 1989 | A |
4969231 | Mader et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5099724 | Reddy, Jr. | Mar 1992 | A |
5211085 | Liou | May 1993 | A |
5280739 | Liou | Jan 1994 | A |
5339482 | Desimone et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5530989 | Remmert et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5581845 | Yang | Dec 1996 | A |
5740586 | Gomas | Apr 1998 | A |
5752287 | Wheat | May 1998 | A |
5781956 | Kelsay et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5799369 | Schulein | Sep 1998 | A |
5911798 | Arnold | Jun 1999 | A |
6024903 | Naft et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6101895 | Yamane | Aug 2000 | A |
6108869 | Meessmann et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6161256 | Quiring et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170123 | Holland-Letz | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6199460 | Lo | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6220128 | Hu | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223627 | Jan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230366 | Lin | May 2001 | B1 |
6305815 | Lin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308378 | Mooty et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6401290 | Barton et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405619 | Lamond et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408524 | Lai | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6513198 | Lu | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6604256 | Pytlewski | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6619408 | Lai | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629338 | Dierolf et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6662406 | Shonfeld et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6721997 | Hua | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6742215 | Panfili et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6772994 | Lawless | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6776073 | Brady et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6779235 | Newman et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
20020194706 | Lu | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030233734 | McGuyer et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 005 635 | Nov 1979 | EP |
2147242 | May 1985 | GB |
WO 0009296 | Feb 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040231100 A1 | Nov 2004 | US |