The present invention relates generally to a food processing and delivery system and method for use thereof, and more specifically to a self-contained, customizable and personalized food delivery system and method of use thereof.
Most households in America are faced with the continuous challenge of teaching their kids to make good decisions about food choice. This active conversation between parents and children can often lead to arguments and ultimately feelings of discord which can become part of a very negative dialogue for most families. As a result, there is not only valuable time lost for families associated with this tension, but also a true financial cost due to food waste and non-nutritious food intake. Beyond the emotional issues associated with healthy food choices, families are also facing rising expenses associated with food.
This problem or challenge most certainly exists globally, ultimately presenting an opportunity for an international revenue model, but the early scope of the business concept is to remain focused on the approximately 40 million households which participate in the production and/or consumption of garden-raised, home-canned goods.
What is needed is a system providing easily customizable and personalized food options which can be entirely produced, labeled, and delivered at a single point. Food items can be produced by qualified households, food manufacturers or other qualified market participants.
Heretofore there has not been available a system or method for a customizable food and recipe delivery system with the advantages and features of the present invention.
The present invention generally provides an interactive and customizable food delivery system with a high degree of personalization. The system provides for the personalization of a product and product label thereby delivering a client-specified food product based upon their recipe input through a computer device interface. Through use of a computer interface, such as a mobile computing device or “smart phone,” personal computer, or even through a unique computerized kiosk located at a fixed location, the user can input recipes or order products from existing recipes. The product is prepared either locally or remotely and is then delivered or shipped to the user with a customized label indicating ingredients and other information.
Benefits of the present invention include, but are not limited to: (1) customized recipe generation resulting from an interaction system; (2) personalized, home-preserved goods which can be labeled; (3) facilitation of produce and home-preserved goods exchanged in an exclusive web environment with a variety of qualified market participants—expert households, food manufacturers, community gardens, community kitchens, buying institutions; and (4) educational processes and information for food preservation.
The drawings constitute a part of this specification and include exemplary embodiments of the present invention illustrating various objects and features thereof.
As required, detailed aspects of the present invention are disclosed herein, however, it is to be understood that the disclosed aspects are merely exemplary of the invention, which may be embodied in various forms. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art how to variously employ the present invention in virtually any appropriately detailed structure.
Certain terminology will be used in the following description for convenience in reference only and will not be limiting. For example, up, down, front, back, right and left refer to the invention as orientated in the view being referred to. The words, “inwardly” and “outwardly” refer to directions toward and away from, respectively, the geometric center of the aspect being described and designated parts thereof. Forwardly and rearwardly are generally in reference to the direction of travel, if appropriate. Said terminology will include the words specifically mentioned, derivatives thereof and words of similar meaning. Additional examples include computing devices such as a mobile smart device including a display device for viewing a typical web browser or user interface will be commonly referred to throughout the following description. The type of device, computer, display, or user interface may vary when practicing an embodiment of the present invention. A computing device could be represented by a desktop personal computer, a laptop computer, “smart” mobile phones, PDAs, tablets, or other handheld computing devices. The computing device could be included in a stand-alone kiosk which is electrically communicating with a local or remote system for producing, exchanging or gifting and in some instances selling customized and/or personalized garden and preserved food goods or other final products.
As shown, the member user interface 8 includes recipe creation features 10 and uploads of recipes created by members, safety testing and supply 12 which can be provided by a central entity, third parties, or other members, and processing support and video education 14 which also would be handled by a central entity or third party. These features provide a typical buyer/seller relationship with quality control on the back end. Other features of the present invention include commerce/trade features 16, such as the examples shown in the box therein. Two members can exchange goods directly using the system, or can create products for mere buyer-members. The member user interface 8 likely is a computer interface, such as a touch screen smart kiosk, mobile computing device (e.g. smartphone, tablet computer) or a personal computer.
Each of the qualified households 18, 20 have both inputs into the network 26 and outputs coming out of the network as shown in
The member buyer/user 22, which would likely be the most common user for the system, can create recipes 34 which can be submitted to the network 26 and be fulfilled either by the supply/process entity 24 or any of the qualified households 18, 20. These recipes may then also be stored in an archive 44 with the supply/process entity for access by other members. The member can also request 36 goods, such as those advertised by the qualified households. Purchased goods 38 are then shipped directly to the member 22.
The supply/process entity 24 may also act as a central entity which owns and operates the entire delivery system 2. This entity receives goods and productions for testing 40 from qualified households and approves them or rejects them, receives orders for goods 42 from members, and receives the members' recipes for archiving 44. The supply/process entity may also supply goods 46 out to members, or may source this from third parties.
Members have an option to send a charity a copy of whatever they order through the network 26, or to send a gift to another person who may or may not be a member. These charity or gift recipients 48 receive the goods purchased by members or sent for free by a qualified household through the communication and shipping network 26. Goods shipped through the network 26 could be sent directly to the buyer or recipient in the mail or other door-to-door delivery method, or could be sent to a localized kiosk or delivery point for pickup by the recipient or buyer.
Similarly, the qualified household computing device 76 includes CPU and Data storage 78, a software application 80 for accessing the product delivery system 2, and a local data base with data input 82 for creating customized recipes and orders. The device 76 should also include a graphical user interface (GUI) 84, a location determination feature 86, such as a GNSS like GPS, and a camera 88 for taking and uploading photographs of recipes or products.
The central computing device 66, which is a central server most likely associated with the supply/process entity 24, but could be a separate entity, houses the central point of the product delivery system 2. There is a CPU and data storage 68, application software 70 necessary to arrange the features of the system as described above, and a master database 72 which includes records of all purchases, recipes, educational videos, and other data uploaded to the central computing device 66. Third party sources 74 may also add data to the master database. These third parties may include product sources used by the supply/process entity to fulfill orders.
In lieu of every member having a mobile computing device or personal computer to access the network, smart kiosks 90, such as shown in
Next, the user must determine if they would like a customized label at 210. If yes, the user will design and create the label at 212, either by interacting with the graphical user interface of their selected computing device or smart kiosk, or by inserting or uploading a previously-created label. Otherwise, the user can select a standard label at 214, which may be selected from a list of preexisting labels.
The user will need to determine if they would also like to purchase a charity batch at 216. As described above, this charity batch would be an exact copy of the product they are ordering, but would be delivered for free to a charity or recipient of the user's choice. If the user decides to create a charity batch at 216, the user selects the charity and inputs its relevant data at 218. Otherwise the system receives and confirms the selection at 220, a confirmation is generated and sent to the user at 222, such as via email, and the order is transferred to processing at 224. The processing step here may send the request out to a qualified household or third party, but the result is that the product is made according to the specifications as entered in the kiosk, and then the product is packaged and shipped at 226 and the process ends at 228 with the user receiving their ordered product.
Additionally, users can create sharable recipe libraries and videos about their personalized and/or custom food-making for other users to watch and learn from.
The order is transmitted to the processing facility, which may be local to the ordering station (e.g. at the kiosk) or remote from the user. The processing facility could automatically generate the product from the recipe using machinery. Once the product is prepared, it is packaged and labeled and the selected quantities are sent to the user and to all other recipients selected by the user.
For orders transmitted, the user will build the product recipe from several category lists which includes ingredients or base components of the final product. This again would be done using a computerized interface as described above. After the product is designed by the user using the computerized interface, the steps continue as outlined above. This alternative embodiment provides a more simplified approach to providing a finished food product. Alternatively, for self-produced orders by qualified households, orders are made in accordance with documented recipe procedures as established within the system and as processed by the processing entity.
The order is generated by the user as shown, with the futures order 324 including standardized goods package 338 (e.g. such as a 24-pack of goods), the determined future's rate 340 paid, and any substitution details 342. The substitution details allow the supply entity 328 to deliver substitute goods in place of the ordered goods if the ordered goods are unavailable. For example, if the user orders a crate of one type of vegetable, but indicates that other types are allowed as substitute in the substitute details 342 of the futures order 324 at the rate paid, those substitute goods can be provided in the absence of the ordered goods.
The order goes to the supply/process entity 328. This entity has goods 344, substitute goods 346, and alternative payment 348 available for responding to the order. Once the future date arrives, the supply/process entity 328 creates the delivery 330. This delivery includes the goods, substitute goods, or alternative payment 318 as well as a delivery date 320. For example, the delivery can include the goods as ordered, substitute goods as agreed upon in the futures order, or a cash or alternative payment if no goods are available at that time. The rates are all based upon the original order and agreed upon prices. The delivery is then sent to the ember buyer/user 322 through whatever channels are agreed upon.
Once the request is accepted at 358, the process waits until the date arrives at 360. If the goods are available at 362, those goods are delivered at 364 and the process ends at 372. If the goods are not available at 362, but agreed upon substitute goods are available at 366, those substitute goods are delivered at 368 and the process ends at 372. Otherwise cash or alternative payback is delivered to the user at 370, and the process ends at 372.
As above, this process may be initiated by the supply/process entity 328. The flow chart of
It is to be understood that while certain embodiments and/or aspects of the invention have been shown and described, the invention is not limited thereto and encompasses various other embodiments and aspects.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/857,841 filed Apr. 24, 2020, which is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/453,533, filed Mar. 8, 2017, which claims priority in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/305,897, filed Mar. 9, 2016, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
11176770 | Ambauen | Nov 2021 | B2 |
20030141214 | MacGuire | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20070150375 | Yang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070294129 | Froseth | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090071972 | Peyran et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090150241 | Laboise | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157752 | Gonzalez | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20120262271 | Torgersrud et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130191251 | Martin et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130317921 | Havas | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140101233 | Mina | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140324607 | Frehn et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330603 | Corder et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150088694 | Ackerman | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150145642 | Rutledge et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150235193 | Cummings | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160170939 | Chen et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170256119 | Abdelmalak | Sep 2017 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Hannah Mars, “Two Good to be true”, Feb. 22, 2016, broadsheet (Year: 2016). |
The Solo Cook , “Swap fresh food from garden with neighbors and friends”, https://thesolocook.com/2012/06/25/garden-share-food-strawberries-neighbors/, Jun. 25, 2012, 1-4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220383378 A1 | Dec 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62305897 | Mar 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16857841 | Apr 2020 | US |
Child | 17884848 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15453533 | Mar 2017 | US |
Child | 16857841 | US |