Customized head gimbal assembly bonding skew angle for adjusting two-dimensional magnetic recording reader alignment

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9135935
  • Patent Number
    9,135,935
  • Date Filed
    Friday, December 6, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 15, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
System and methods are illustrated for customizing the HGA bonding skew angle of a TDMR slider including a plurality of readers to adjust reader alignment relative to a track location on disk media. Overlay error caused by manufacturing variations is compensated for by adjusting the skew angle of the slider when it is bonded to the suspension to form the HGA. Process operations for manufacturing a TMDR HDD include manufacturing a multiple reader, multiple layer TDMR slider, determining an overlay error in the slider, determining a slider bonding skew angle based on the determined overlay error and other parameters, and bonding the slider to a HDD suspension at the determined bonding skew angle.
Description
BACKGROUND

In magnetic storage devices such as hard disk drives (HDD), read and write heads are used to magnetically read and write information to and from the storage media. In a HDD, data is stored on one or more disks in a series of adjacent concentric circles. A HDD comprises a rotary actuator, a suspension mounted on an arm of the rotary actuator, and a slider bonded to the suspension to form a head gimbal assembly (HGA). In a traditional HDD, the slider carries a write head and read head, and radially floats over the surface of the disk under the control of a servo control system that selectively positions a head over a specific track of the disk. In this one read head (reader) configuration, the reader is aligned over the center of a track for data read back.


As HDD storage capacities have increased, the data track separation has decreased and the density has increased. However, as adjacent tracks are moved closer together, noise interference from adjacent tracks during data read back, Inter-Track Interference (ITI), becomes an increasing concern. If there is too much ITI, data may not be readable from a track. This places a limitation on the storage density of traditional one reader head per slider hard disk drive assemblies.


Two-Dimensional Magnetic Recording (TDMR) has recently been developed for pushing magnetic media storage densities for hard disk drives (HDD) well beyond 1 Tb/in2. In TDMR HDD assemblies, the slider comprises a plurality of reader heads: at least one data track reader, and one or more ITI noise cancelling readers. In this arrangement, the ITI signals that corrupt the data being recovered from a data track of interest can be cancelled by reading at least one of the adjacent (interfering) tracks and using the read signals to cancel the ITI on the data read from the data track of interest. Current manufacturing process limitations, where adjacent readers are separated by at least two track pitches (center to center) require that these plurality of readers be manufactured on at least two or more layers separated by a longitudinal distance. There are, however, process variations during manufacture of the readers on different layers. In particular, photolithography limitations induce a variable Overlay Error (OLE) during manufacture. Accordingly, systems and methods for correcting this OLE are desired.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present application is illustrated by way of example, and not limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which:



FIGS. 1A-1C illustrate the slider OLE variability in processes for manufacturing a two-reader TDMR in accordance with the present disclosure.



FIG. 2 is an operational flow diagram illustrating an exemplary TDMR HDD manufacturing process that corrects for the variable OLE illustrated in FIGS. 1A-1C



FIG. 3 is a top view illustrating an exemplary two-reader, two-layer TDMR slider configuration before bonding the slider to the suspension and after bonding the slider to the suspension at a determined bonding skew angle in accordance with the process of FIG. 2.



FIG. 4 is a top view illustrating an exemplary three-reader, two-layer TDMR slider configuration before bonding the slider to the suspension and after bonding the slider to the suspension at a determined bonding skew angle in accordance with the process of FIG. 2.



FIG. 5 is a top view illustrating an exemplary three-reader, three-layer TDMR configuration before bonding the slider to the suspension and after bonding the slider to the suspension at a determined bonding skew angle in accordance with the process of FIG. 2.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of various embodiment of the present disclosure. It will be apparent to one skilled in the art, however, that these specific details need not be employed to practice various embodiments of the present disclosure. In other instances, well known components or methods have not been described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring various embodiments of the present disclosure.



FIGS. 1A-1C illustrate the slider OLE variability relative to disk media data tracks 101-104 in processes for manufacturing a two-reader TDMR in accordance with the present disclosure. In the illustrated embodiments, data is read from data track 102 by a reader (115, 135, or 155) while a corresponding adjacent IT noise canceling reader (105, 125, or 145) reads an adjacent ITI canceling track 103. The ITI signals that corrupt the data read from data track 102 may be canceled by using the read signals from ITI canceling track 103. Also illustrated are track 101 (not used for ITI canceling) and track 104, which is two tracks away from data track 102.



FIG. 1A illustrates the desired configuration of data track reader 115 and ITI noise canceling reader 105. In this desired configuration, the OLE between the two readers is zero. However process variations in the manufacture of the two-reader TDMR may result in the configurations shown in FIGS. 1B-1C. FIG. 1B illustrates a positive OLE 130 between a data track reader 135 and an ITI noise canceling reader 125. FIG. 1C illustrates a negative OLE 150 between a data track reader 155 and an ITI noise canceling reader 145. This variable OLE appears because of limits in the definable critical dimension during manufacture of these multi-layer, multi-reader assemblies.


In accordance with the present disclosure, system and methods are illustrated for customizing the HGA bonding skew angle of a TDMR slider to adjust reader alignment relative to a track location on a disk media. In the illustrated embodiments, OLE caused by manufacturing variations is compensated for by adjusting the skew angle of the slider when it is bonded to the suspension to form the HGA.



FIG. 2 is an operational flow diagram illustrating an exemplary TDMR HDD manufacturing process 200 that corrects for the variable OLE illustrated in FIGS. 1A-1C. FIG. 2 will be described in conjunction with FIG. 3, which is a top view illustrating an exemplary two-reader, two-layer TDMR slider configuration before bonding the slider to the suspension and after bonding the slider to the suspension at a determined bonding skew angle in accordance with the process of FIG. 2. For simplicity some operations are omitted from the description of process 200.


At operation 210, a TDMR slider comprising a plurality of reads distributed over a plurality of readers is manufactured. Variations in photolithographic OLE during manufacture of the TDMR slider may result in readers with a positive OLE, a negative OLE, or no OLE. FIG. 3 illustrates an example two-reader, two-layer configuration 300 after manufacture of a TDMR slider. In this example, readers 301 and 302 have a positive OLE 304. At operation 220, the slider OLE is determined. In one embodiment, determination of the slider OLE comprises imaging the plurality of readers at an air-bearing surface (ABS) using a suitable imaging device such as for example, a scanning electron microscope (SEM). In other embodiments, an atomic force microscope (AFM) may be used take images of the reader array at the ABS.


At operation 230, the slider bond skew angle for bonding it to a suspension is determined based on the determined slider OLE and other parameters. In one embodiment, the slider bonding skew angle is the slider bonding angle to the suspension that minimizes or eliminates slider OLE relative to a track location on a magnetic read media. In other embodiments, the slider bonding skew angle may depend on an acceptable maximum bonding angle and/or an acceptable amount of OLE correction. For example, if the OLE between two readers in a two reader TDMR configuration is acceptable based on predetermined process parameters, the slider may be bonded to the suspension with no skew. In embodiments where there is no OLE between the slider's plurality of readers, the bonding skew angle is zero, i.e. the slider may be bonded to the suspension with no skew.


The determined bonding skew angle for a slider to the suspension may depend on a function comprising one or more of the following parameters: the OLE error between adjacent readers (i.e. positive or negative separation between readers), the longitudinal separation between readers, the magnetic read media data track width, the reader width, the reader length, the reader height, and the reader shape. In some embodiments, the available skew angle adjustment range is approximately −10 to +10 degrees, and the OLE range is approximately −50 nm to 50 nm. In one particular embodiment, the OLE is approximately 10 nm, the layer separation (longitudinal distance between readers) is approximately 70 nm, and the skew adjustment angle is approximately 8 degrees. FIG. 3 illustrates a determined bonding skew angle 333 for a two-reader, two-layer TMDR comprising a positive OLE 304 and a longitudinal separation 305 between readers 301 and 302. In this example, the bonding skew angle 333 is selected to eliminate OLE 304 relative to a track location on magnetic read media.


At operation 240, the slider is bonded to the HDD suspension at the determined bonding skew angle. In one embodiment, the sliders may be bonded at a desired skew angle using bins. Based on the ABS images and the determined bonding skew angle, the slider may be grouped into bins with appropriate bonding angle difference between bins. For example, bins may be grouped with an angular step difference between bins. The step size of a bin may be predefined based on a mounting skew tolerance range. In one embodiment, a step size is 2 degrees. In such an embodiment, for example, 9 bins would cover +/−8 degrees (i.e. a range of 16 degrees) of skew error. In this embodiment, each bin would comprise a tailored HGA mounting fixture and customized Flex Print with appropriately located bonding pads for bonding to the slider bonding pads. In one embodiment, gold ball bonding is used for bonding to the pads. In this exemplary embodiment, the number of bonding parts may depend on the skew angle.


Configuration 320 of FIG. 3 illustrates the example two-reader, two-layer arrangement after bonding the slider to the suspension at determined bonding skew angle 333. As illustrated in FIG. 3, bonding skew angle 333 eliminates OLE 304 relative to a track location on a magnetic read media. This provides the benefit improving read accuracy and reducing ITI during read operations.



FIG. 4 is a top view illustrating an exemplary three-reader, two-layer TDMR slider configuration before bonding the slider to the suspension (configuration 400) and after bonding the slider to the suspension (configuration 420) at a determined bonding skew angle 407 in accordance with the process of FIG. 2. In this exemplary embodiment, three readers 401, 402, and 403 are manufactured on two separate layers. Flanking Readers 401 and 402 are manufactured on the same layer and may be manufactured with a predetermined separation distance to allow sufficient space for a permanent magnetic bias between the two readers. In one example embodiment, the predetermined separation distance between readers 401 and 402 is at least two track pitches. As illustrated in FIG. 4, reader 403 is formed on a layer with longitudinal separation 406 from the layer used to form readers 401 and 402. In an alternative embodiment, reader 403 may be formed on a layer above the layer used to form readers 401 and 402. The slider, initially manufactured in configuration 400, is bonded to a HDD HGA at bonding angle 407 through bonding operation 410, resulting in configuration 420.


In example configuration 400, there are two overlay errors: OLE 405 between flanking reader 401 and reader 403, and OLE 404 between flanking reader 402 and reader 403. In alternative embodiments, initial configuration 400 may comprise one or no OLE (e.g. reader 403 is aligned with reader 401 and/or reader 402), in which case the bonding skew angle may be zero. Determination of a bonding skew angle 407 may be based on OLE 404, OLE 405, LS 406, and other parameters. In this particular example, the skew angle is determined such that reader 403 is approximately centered between adjacent readers 401 and 402. Depending on longitudinal separation 406, the dimensions of the readers, OLE 404, and OLE 405, centering reader 403 during bonding operation 410 at skew angle 407 may reduce or eliminate OLE 404, OLE 405, or some combination thereof (e.g. reduce both OLE or the sum of the OLE). In other embodiments, reader 403 may not be centered. For example, the skew angle may be determined based on a configuration that prioritizes eliminating one of OLE 404 or OLE 405.



FIG. 5 is a top view illustrating an exemplary three-reader, three-layer TDMR configuration before bonding the slider to the suspension (configuration 500) and after bonding the slider to the suspension (configuration 520) at a determined bonding skew angle 508 in accordance with the process of FIG. 2. In this exemplary embodiment, three readers 501, 502, and 503 are manufactured on three separate layers. In different embodiments, the relative orientation of the readers may vary. For example, reader 503 may be manufactured in the bottom layer, the middle layer, or the top layer of the three layers. In one embodiment, central reader 503 is at the lowest or highest layer of the three-reader three-layer stack to reduce the skew adjustment effect on the distance between flanking readers 501 and 502.


As illustrated in FIG. 5, there is longitudinal separation 506 between reader 503 and reader 501, and longitudinal separation 507 between reader 503 and reader 502. In alternate embodiments, the two longitudinal separations may be identified in any combination that may be used to derive the longitudinal separation between the bottom layer and middle layer, and the top layer and middle layer. In example configuration 500, there are two overlay errors: OLE 505 between reader 501 and reader 503, and OLE 504 between reader 502 and reader 503. In alternative embodiments, initial configuration 500 may comprise one or no OLE (e.g. reader 503 is aligned with reader 501 and/or reader 502), in which case the bonding skew angle may be zero. Determination of a bonding skew angle 508 may be based on OLE 504, OLE 505, LS 506, LS 507, and other parameters. The bonding skew angle 508 may be determined based on a configuration 520 that centers reader 503 between readers 501 and reader 502. Alternatively, the bonding skew angle 508 may be based on an alternative desired configuration. The slider, initially manufactured in configuration 500, is bonded to a HDD HGA at bonding angle 508 through bonding operation 510, resulting in configuration 520


In the foregoing specification, embodiments of the disclosure have been described with reference to specific exemplary features thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the disclosure. The specification and figures are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.

Claims
  • 1. A method of correcting overlay error (OLE) in a slider comprising a plurality of readers, comprising: determining a first OLE between a first reader and a second reader of the slider;determining a bonding skew angle of the slider prior to bonding it to a suspension; andbonding the slider to the suspension at the determined bonding skew angle.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first OLE is determined based on a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) image of the plurality of readers at an air bearing surface (ABS).
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the bonding skew angle of the slider is based on the first OLE.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the bonding skew angle is zero.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the slider is bonded to the suspension using a skew bin.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the first reader is on a first layer of the slider, and wherein the second reader is on a second layer of the slider.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the bonding skew angle is further based on the longitudinal separation between the first layer and the second layer.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, further comprising manufacturing the slider prior to determining the first OLE.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the slider is a two-dimensional magnetic recording (TDMR) slider.
  • 10. The method of claim 8, wherein the bonding skew angle is further based on a second OLE between the second reader and a third reader.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the third reader is on the first layer.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, wherein the third reader is on a third layer.
  • 13. The method of claim 7, wherein the bonding skew angle is further based on the width of each of the plurality of readers.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/890,122, filed Oct. 11, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (196)
Number Name Date Kind
3780266 Mudsam et al. Dec 1973 A
4012781 Lin Mar 1977 A
4597023 Rijckaert Jun 1986 A
4761699 Ainslie et al. Aug 1988 A
5229901 Mallary Jul 1993 A
5270892 Naberhuis Dec 1993 A
5309305 Nepela et al. May 1994 A
5321557 Shimotashiro et al. Jun 1994 A
5353176 Kosuge Oct 1994 A
5388014 Brug et al. Feb 1995 A
5508868 Cheng et al. Apr 1996 A
5523904 Saliba Jun 1996 A
5684658 Shi et al. Nov 1997 A
5696654 Gill et al. Dec 1997 A
5721008 Huang et al. Feb 1998 A
5796535 Tuttle et al. Aug 1998 A
5831888 Glover Nov 1998 A
5963400 Cates et al. Oct 1999 A
6071007 Schaenzer et al. Jun 2000 A
6075673 Wilde et al. Jun 2000 A
6097575 Trang et al. Aug 2000 A
6104562 Ottesen et al. Aug 2000 A
6125014 Riedlin, Jr. Sep 2000 A
6125015 Carlson et al. Sep 2000 A
6130863 Wang et al. Oct 2000 A
6137656 Levi et al. Oct 2000 A
6144528 Anaya-Dufresne et al. Nov 2000 A
6147838 Chang et al. Nov 2000 A
6151196 Carlson et al. Nov 2000 A
6154335 Smith et al. Nov 2000 A
6157510 Schreck et al. Dec 2000 A
6178064 Chang et al. Jan 2001 B1
6181522 Carlson Jan 2001 B1
6181673 Wilde et al. Jan 2001 B1
6191925 Watson Feb 2001 B1
6216242 Schaenzer Apr 2001 B1
6229672 Lee et al. May 2001 B1
6236543 Han et al. May 2001 B1
6246547 Bozorgi et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249404 Doundakov et al. Jun 2001 B1
6271998 Coehoorn et al. Aug 2001 B1
6311551 Boutaghou Nov 2001 B1
6330131 Nepela et al. Dec 2001 B1
6339518 Chang et al. Jan 2002 B1
6341102 Sato et al. Jan 2002 B1
6349017 Schott Feb 2002 B1
6369982 Saliba Apr 2002 B2
6373660 Lam et al. Apr 2002 B1
6378195 Carlson Apr 2002 B1
6449131 Guo et al. Sep 2002 B2
6462541 Wang et al. Oct 2002 B1
6496333 Han et al. Dec 2002 B1
6522504 Casey Feb 2003 B1
6538850 Hadian et al. Mar 2003 B1
6583953 Han et al. Jun 2003 B1
6646832 Anaya-Dufresne et al. Nov 2003 B2
6661612 Peng Dec 2003 B1
6665146 Hawwa et al. Dec 2003 B2
6674618 Engel et al. Jan 2004 B2
6690545 Chang et al. Feb 2004 B1
6704173 Lam et al. Mar 2004 B1
6708389 Carlson et al. Mar 2004 B1
6717773 Hawwa et al. Apr 2004 B2
6721142 Meyer et al. Apr 2004 B1
6744599 Peng et al. Jun 2004 B1
6771468 Levi et al. Aug 2004 B1
6796018 Thornton Sep 2004 B1
6801402 Subrahmanyam et al. Oct 2004 B1
6842312 Alstrin et al. Jan 2005 B1
6856489 Hawwa et al. Feb 2005 B2
6873496 Sun et al. Mar 2005 B1
6912103 Peng et al. Jun 2005 B1
6921592 Tani et al. Jul 2005 B2
6937439 Chang et al. Aug 2005 B1
6947247 Schwarz et al. Sep 2005 B2
6956718 Kulkarni et al. Oct 2005 B1
6972930 Tang et al. Dec 2005 B1
6995957 Jayasekara Feb 2006 B2
7002777 Ogawa et al. Feb 2006 B2
7006330 Subrahmanyam et al. Feb 2006 B1
7006331 Subrahmanyam et al. Feb 2006 B1
7010847 Hadian et al. Mar 2006 B1
7019945 Peng et al. Mar 2006 B1
7027264 Subrahmanyam et al. Apr 2006 B1
7085104 Hadian et al. Aug 2006 B1
7099117 Subrahmanyam et al. Aug 2006 B1
7106549 Asakura Sep 2006 B2
7174622 Meyer et al. Feb 2007 B2
7193807 Liikanen et al. Mar 2007 B1
7215514 Yang et al. May 2007 B1
7239465 Watson et al. Jul 2007 B1
7242547 Ogawa Jul 2007 B2
7259927 Harris Aug 2007 B2
7271970 Tsuchiya Sep 2007 B2
7289299 Sun et al. Oct 2007 B1
7307816 Thornton et al. Dec 2007 B1
7315435 Pan Jan 2008 B1
7315436 Sanchez Jan 2008 B1
7324303 Ozue et al. Jan 2008 B2
7382585 Nibarger et al. Jun 2008 B1
7405907 Raastad Jul 2008 B2
7408730 Yamagishi Aug 2008 B2
7414814 Pan Aug 2008 B1
7420758 Inoue et al. Sep 2008 B2
7436631 Fanslau, Jr. et al. Oct 2008 B1
7436632 Li et al. Oct 2008 B2
7453671 Nibarger et al. Nov 2008 B1
7474508 Li et al. Jan 2009 B1
7477486 Sun et al. Jan 2009 B1
7502193 Albrecht et al. Mar 2009 B2
7551393 Biskeborn et al. Jun 2009 B2
7593190 Thornton et al. Sep 2009 B1
7595963 Chen et al. Sep 2009 B1
7616405 Hu et al. Nov 2009 B2
7619194 Kobashi Nov 2009 B2
7652847 Weiss et al. Jan 2010 B2
7656610 Campos et al. Feb 2010 B1
7729089 Hogan Jun 2010 B1
7751148 Alstrin et al. Jul 2010 B1
7755863 Neumann et al. Jul 2010 B2
7995310 Pan Aug 2011 B1
8009388 Oh et al. Aug 2011 B2
8081400 Hu Dec 2011 B1
8087973 Sladek et al. Jan 2012 B1
8089730 Pan et al. Jan 2012 B1
8139301 Li et al. Mar 2012 B1
8144424 Dugas et al. Mar 2012 B2
8164858 Moravec et al. Apr 2012 B1
8199437 Sun et al. Jun 2012 B1
8208224 Teo et al. Jun 2012 B1
8208228 Maat et al. Jun 2012 B2
8218268 Pan Jul 2012 B1
8240545 Wang et al. Aug 2012 B1
8256272 Roajanasiri et al. Sep 2012 B1
8295012 Tian et al. Oct 2012 B1
8295013 Pan et al. Oct 2012 B1
8295014 Teo et al. Oct 2012 B1
8320084 Shum et al. Nov 2012 B1
8325446 Liu et al. Dec 2012 B1
8325447 Pan Dec 2012 B1
8339742 Sladek et al. Dec 2012 B1
8339747 Hales et al. Dec 2012 B1
8339748 Shum et al. Dec 2012 B2
8343363 Pakpum et al. Jan 2013 B1
8345519 Pan Jan 2013 B1
8418353 Moravec et al. Apr 2013 B1
8441896 Wang et al. May 2013 B2
8446694 Tian et al. May 2013 B1
8456643 Prabhakaran et al. Jun 2013 B2
8456776 Pan Jun 2013 B1
8462462 Moravec et al. Jun 2013 B1
8477459 Pan Jul 2013 B1
8485579 Roajanasiri et al. Jul 2013 B2
8488279 Pan et al. Jul 2013 B1
8488281 Pan Jul 2013 B1
8490211 Leary Jul 2013 B1
8514522 Pan et al. Aug 2013 B1
8533936 Puttichaem et al. Sep 2013 B1
8545164 Choumwong et al. Oct 2013 B2
8553365 Shapiro et al. Oct 2013 B1
8587901 Puttichaem et al. Nov 2013 B1
8593764 Tian et al. Nov 2013 B1
8599508 Burd Dec 2013 B1
8599653 Mallary et al. Dec 2013 B1
8605389 Pan et al. Dec 2013 B1
8611050 Moravec et al. Dec 2013 B1
8611052 Pan et al. Dec 2013 B1
8623197 Kobsiriphat et al. Jan 2014 B1
8624184 Souza et al. Jan 2014 B1
8665566 Pan et al. Mar 2014 B1
8665567 Shum et al. Mar 2014 B2
8665677 Panitchakan et al. Mar 2014 B1
8665690 Moravec et al. Mar 2014 B1
8693144 Pan et al. Apr 2014 B1
8711517 Erden et al. Apr 2014 B2
8756795 Moravec et al. Jun 2014 B1
8758083 Rudy et al. Jun 2014 B1
8760812 Chen et al. Jun 2014 B1
8770463 Puttichaem et al. Jul 2014 B1
8773664 Wang et al. Jul 2014 B1
8786987 Edelman et al. Jul 2014 B2
8792212 Pan et al. Jul 2014 B1
8792213 Vijay et al. Jul 2014 B1
8797691 Tian et al. Aug 2014 B1
20030151855 Molstad et al. Aug 2003 A1
20040184181 Fukuda et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050036241 Tsuda et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050036437 Learned et al. Feb 2005 A1
20070242378 Ikegami et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080203279 Kobashi Aug 2008 A1
20100020435 Chen et al. Jan 2010 A1
20120282492 Sasaki et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130244541 Yaemglin et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130286502 Erden et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130293982 Huber Nov 2013 A1
20140160590 Sankaranarayanan et al. Jun 2014 A1
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61890122 Oct 2013 US