The present invention relates to medical devices and methods. More specifically, the invention relates to intervertebral disc prostheses.
Back pain takes an enormous toll on the health and productivity of people around the world. According to the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, approximately 80 percent of Americans will experience back pain at some time in their life. In just the year 2000, approximately 26 million visits were made to physicians' offices due to back problems in the United States. On any one day, it is estimated that 5% of the working population in America is disabled by back pain.
One common cause of back pain is injury, degeneration and/or dysfunction of one or more intervertebral discs. Intervertebral discs are the soft tissue structures located between each of the thirty-three vertebral bones that make up the vertebral (spinal) column. Essentially, the discs allow the vertebrae to move relative to one another. The vertebral column and discs are vital anatomical structures, in that they form a central axis that supports the head and torso, allow for movement of the back, and protect the spinal cord, which passes through the vertebrae in proximity to the discs.
Discs often become damaged due to wear and tear or acute injury. For example, discs may bulge (herniate), tear, rupture, degenerate or the like. A bulging disc may press against the spinal cord or a nerve exiting the spinal cord, causing “radicular” pain (pain in one or more extremities caused by impingement of a nerve root). Degeneration or other damage to a disc may cause a loss of “disc height,” meaning that the natural space between two vertebrae decreases. Decreased disc height may cause a disc to bulge, facet loads to increase, two vertebrae to rub together in an unnatural way and/or increased pressure on certain parts of the vertebrae and/or nerve roots, thus causing pain. In general, chronic and acute damage to intervertebral discs is a common source of back related pain and loss of mobility.
When one or more damaged intervertebral discs cause a patient pain and discomfort, surgery is often required. Traditionally, surgical procedures for treating intervertebral discs have involved discectomy (partial or total removal of a disc), with or without fusion of the two vertebrae adjacent to the disc. Fusion of the two vertebrae is achieved by inserting bone graft material between the two vertebrae such that the two vertebrae and the graft material grow together. Oftentimes, pins, rods, screws, cages and/or the like are inserted between the vertebrae to act as support structures to hold the vertebrae and graft material in place while they permanently fuse together. Although fusion often treats the back pain, it reduces the patient's ability to move, because the back cannot bend or twist at the fused area. In addition, fusion increases stresses at adjacent levels of the spine, potentially accelerating degeneration of these discs.
In an attempt to treat disc related pain without fusion, an alternative approach has been developed, in which a movable, implantable, artificial intervertebral disc (or “disc prosthesis”) is inserted between two vertebrae. A number of different intervertebral disc prostheses are currently being developed. For example, the inventors of the present invention have developed disc prostheses described in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/855,817 and 10/855,253, previously incorporated by reference. Other examples of intervertebral disc prostheses are the LINK® SB Charite disc (provided by DePuy Spine, Inc.) Mobidisk® (provided by LDR Medical (www.ldrmedical.fr)), the Bryan Cervical Disc (provided by Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.), the ProDisc® or ProDisc-C® (from Synthes Stratec, Inc.), and the PCM disc (provided by Cervitech, Inc.). Although existing disc prostheses provide advantages over traditional treatment methods, improvements are ongoing.
Work in relation to the present invention suggests that current prosthesis and methodologies may be less than ideal. For example, some disc prostheses may only partially restore patient motion in some patients. Also, some disc prostheses may potentially provide more motion postoperatively than might occur naturally for an individual patient, depending on his or her individual characteristics. For example, older patients may have a smaller range of motion between vertebrae than younger patients, and a prosthesis with an appropriate range of motion for a younger patient may provide an excessive range of motion for an older patient. Younger active patients may place a greater load on a disc prosthesis, and current prostheses may be less than ideal for restoring motion between the vertebrae in a manner that fully accommodates such active patients.
Therefore, a need exists for improved intervertebral disc prostheses. Ideally, such improved prostheses would avoid at least some of the short comings of the present prostheses.
Embodiments of the present invention provide customizable intervertebral prostheses systems and methods. The prosthesis system comprises supports that can be positioned against vertebrae and a selected resilient core that can be positioned between the supports to allow the supports to articulate. The resilient core can be selected from a plurality of cores in response to patient characteristics, such as age and/or intervertebral mobility, such that the prosthesis implanted in the patient is tailored to the needs of the patient. The plurality of cores comprise cores with different resiliencies, and one of the cores can be selected such that the upper and lower supports articulate with the desired shock absorbing resiliency and/or maximum angle of inclination when the selected core is positioned between the supports. The shock absorbing core may be compressed during insertion into the intervertebral space to minimize distraction between the vertebrae. The supports can comprise known support plates and may comprise, in some embodiments, in situ expandable supports to minimize the invasiveness of the procedure.
In a first aspect an intervertebral disc prosthesis system is provided. The system comprises a plurality of selectable cores. Each core comprises upper and lower surfaces and at least one of a resilient material or a resilient member disposed between the upper and lower surfaces to allow the upper and lower surfaces to move resiliently toward and away from each other. The system also comprises upper and lower supports that are locatable about the core. Each support comprises an outer surface which engages a vertebra and an inner surface that is shaped to contact one of the surfaces of each core. Each core of the plurality comprises a different resiliency. The upper and lower supports are adapted to articulate when one of the cores is selected and positioned between the upper and lower supports.
In many embodiments, each core is identifiable with an indicia, such that each core is selectable in response to the indicia and a patient characteristic. The indicia may comprise at least one of a color of the core, a marking on the core, a height of the core, or a width of the core. In specific embodiments, the indicia of each core corresponds to a resiliency of the core and a maximum angle of inclination between the supports when the core is positioned between the supports.
In many embodiments, each core of the plurality comprises a different dimension to limit a maximum angle of inclination between the upper and lower supports in response to the patient characteristic. The different dimension may comprise at least one of a height or a width.
In many embodiments, the upper surface of each core comprises a curved surface to slide against the inner surface of the upper support. In specific embodiments, lower surface of each core may be capable of attachment to the lower support. In some embodiments, the lower surface of each core comprises a curved surface to slide against the inner surface of the lower support.
In many embodiments, each core comprises an upper component with the upper surface disposed thereon and a lower component with the lower surface disposed thereon. The upper and lower core components of each core can be configured to slide relative to one another in response to loading when positioned between the upper and lower supports, for example loading caused by patient activity. In specific embodiments, the upper and lower components of each core are configured to slide relative to one another with telescopic motion.
In some embodiments, the upper support comprises a upper plate and the lower support comprises a lower plate.
In some embodiments, the upper support comprises an upper expandable support and the lower support comprises a lower expandable support.
In some embodiments, several cores of the plurality comprises the same height and different resiliencies, such that a maximum angle of inclination between the plates is substantially the same for the several cores.
In many embodiments, the plurality of selectable cores comprises cores with a maximum compression within a range from about ⅓ mm to about 1 mm.
In another aspect, an intervertebral disc prosthesis system is provided. The intervertebral disc prosthesis system comprises a plurality of selectable cores. Each core comprises upper and lower curved surfaces. At least one of a resilient material or a resilient member is disposed between the upper and lower curved surfaces to allow the upper and lower surfaces to move resiliently toward and away from each other. The system also comprises upper and lower supports that are locatable about the core. Each support comprises an outer surface, which engages a vertebra, and an inner curved surface shaped to slide over one of the curved surfaces of each core. Each core of the plurality comprises a different resiliency. The upper and lower supports are adapted to articulate when one of the cores is selected and positioned between the upper and lower supports.
In many embodiments, each core is identifiable with an indicia, such that each core is selectable in response to the indicia and a patient characteristic. The indicia may comprise at least one of a color of the core, a marking on the core, a height of the core, or a width of the core. In specific embodiments, the indicia of each core corresponds to a resiliency of the core and a maximum angle of inclination between the supports when the core is positioned between the supports.
In many embodiments, the at least one resilient material comprises a polymer. The at least one resilient material may comprise a hydrogel. The at least one resilient support member may be disposed within the resilient material and attached to the upper and lower curved surfaces.
In many embodiments, the at least one resilient support member comprises a plurality of springs.
In many embodiments, the upper and lower curved surfaces of the core comprise at least one of a polymer, a ceramic and a metal. The metal may comprise at least one of cobalt chrome molybdenum, titanium or stainless steel.
In another aspect, a method of assembling an intervertebral prosthesis for insertion into a patient is provided. A resilient core is selected from among a plurality of resilient cores. The core is placed between first and second supports. The core is selected in response to a resiliency of the core and a patient characteristic.
In many embodiments, the selected core is identified with an indicia and selected in response to the indicia and a patient characteristic. The indicia may comprise at least one of a color of the core, a marking on the core, a height of the core, or a width of the core. In specific embodiments, the indicia of each core corresponds to a resiliency of the core and a maximum angle of inclination between the supports when the core is positioned between the supports.
In many embodiments, the first and second supports articulate when the core is positioned between the supports. The core may comprise first and second components that slide relative to each other when the core is loaded.
In many embodiments, the core is selected in response to a maximum angle of inclination when the core is positioned between the supports.
In another aspect, a method of inserting an intervertebral prosthesis into an intervertebral space between vertebrae of a patient is provided. A shock absorbing core is compressed from an expanded profile configuration to a narrow profile configuration when the core is inserted into the intervertebral space. The shock absorbing core can articulate an upper support and a lower support when positioned between the upper support and the lower support.
In many embodiments, the upper support and the lower support are positioned in the intervertebral space, and the shock absorbing core is inserted between the upper support and the lower support while the upper support and the lower support are positioned in the intervertebral space. In specific embodiments, shock absorbing core locks into place within the upper plate or the lower plate.
In many embodiments, the core is positioned between the upper support and the lower support when the upper support and the lower support are inserted into the intervertebral space. In specific embodiments, the upper support and the lower support articulate when the upper support and the lower support are inserted into the intervertebral space.
In some embodiments, the shock absorbing core is compressed with an instrument when the core is inserted into the intervertebral space. The shock absorbing core can be compressed by at least about 0.5 mm when the core is inserted into the intervertebral space.
In another aspect, an intervertebral disc prosthesis is provided. The prosthesis comprises a resilient core. The core comprises an upper component with an upper surface and a lower component with a lower surface. At least one of a resilient material or a resilient member is disposed between the upper and lower components so as to allow the upper and lower components to move resiliently toward and away from each other. The upper and lower components define an inner chamber of the core. At least one channel extends from the inner chamber to an external surface of the core to allow the passage of fluid through the chamber. The prosthesis also comprises upper and lower supports locatable about the core. Each support comprises an outer surface which engages a vertebra, and an inner surface shaped to contact one of the surfaces of the core. The upper and lower supports are adapted to articulate when the core is positioned between the upper and lower supports.
In some embodiments, the at least one channel comprises at least two channels that extend from the chamber to the external surface of the core to pass fluid through the core. the at least one channel can be adapted to pump fluid out of the core when the components move toward each other and draw fluid into the core when the components move away from each other.
In another aspect, an instrument for insertion of a intervertebral disc prosthesis into an intervertebral space is provided. The instrument comprises a distractor tip that comprises a channel dimensioned to pass the prosthesis. The instrument also comprises at least one of a resilient member or a resilient material to compress the prosthesis from an expanded profile configuration to a narrow profile configuration with the distractor tip when the prosthesis slides along the channel toward the intervertebral space.
In many embodiments, a pair of handles is connected to the distractor tip. The resilient member comprises a spring connected to the handles to drive the handles apart and compress the prosthesis to the narrow profile configuration.
In another aspect, a system for insertion of an intervertebral disc prosthesis into an intervertebral space is provided. The system comprises a plurality of selectable shock absorbing intervertebral disc prosthesis cores, and an instrument. The instrument comprises a distractor tip with a channel dimensioned to pass the prosthesis. The distractor tip is capable of compressing at least one of the plurality of cores from an expanded profile configuration to a narrow profile configuration when the prosthesis slides along the channel toward the intervertebral space.
In many embodiments, the expanded profile configuration comprises an unloaded configuration of the at least one of the plurality of cores, and the narrow profile configuration comprises a maximum loaded compression of the at least one of the plurality of cores.
Various embodiments of the present invention generally provide for an intervertebral disc prosthesis having upper and lower plates disposed about a selectable core. The selectable core includes a resilient material, which allows the core to absorb forces applied to it by vertebrae. The shock absorbing cores can be used with many prosthesis and approaches to the intervertebral disc space including anterior, lateral, posterior and posterior lateral approaches. Although various embodiments of such a prosthesis are shown in the figures and described further below, the general principles of these embodiments, namely selecting a core with a force absorbing material in response to patient needs, may be applied to any of a number of other disc prostheses, such as but not limited to the LINK® SB Charite disc (provided by DePuy Spine, Inc.) Mobidisk® (provided by LDR Medical (www.ldrmedical.fr)), the Bryan Cervical Disc and Maverick Lumbar Disc (provided by Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.), the ProDisc® or ProDisc-C® (from Synthes Stratec, Inc.), and the PCM disc (provided by Cervitech, Inc.). In some embodiments, the selectable core can be used with an expandable intervertebral prosthesis, as described in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/787,110, entitled “Posterior Spinal Device and Method”, filed Apr. 12, 2007, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
In some embodiments, the outer surface 18 is planar. Oftentimes, the outer surface 18 will include one or more surface features and/or materials to enhance attachment of the prosthesis 10 to vertebral bone. For example, the outer surface 18 may be machined to have serrations 20 or other surface features for promoting adhesion of the upper plate 12 to a vertebra. In the embodiment shown, the serrations 20 extend in mutually orthogonal directions, but other geometries would also be useful. Additionally, the outer surface 18 may be provided with a rough microfinish formed by blasting with aluminum oxide microparticles or the like. In some embodiments, the outer surface may also be titanium plasma sprayed to further enhance attachment of the outer surface 18 to vertebral bone.
The outer surface 18 may also carry an upstanding, vertical fin 22 extending in an anterior-posterior direction. The fin 22 is pierced by transverse holes 23. In alternative embodiments, the fin 22 may be rotated away from the anterior-posterior axis, such as in a lateral-lateral orientation, a posterolateral-anterolateral orientation, or the like. In some embodiments, the fin 22 may extend from the surface 18 at an angle other than 90.degree. Furthermore, multiple fins 22 may be attached to the surface 18 and/or the fin 22 may have any other suitable configuration, in various embodiments. In some embodiments, such as discs 10 for cervical insertion, the fins 22, 42 may be omitted altogether.
The inner, spherically curved concave surface 24 is formed at a central (from right to left), axial position with a circular recess 26 as illustrated. At the outer edge of the curved surface 24, the upper plate 12 carries peripheral restraining structure comprising an integral ring structure 26 including an inwardly directed rib or flange 28. The flange 28 forms part of a U-shaped member 30 joined to the major part of the plate by an annular web 32. The flange 28 has an inwardly tapering shape and defines upper and lower surfaces 34 and 36 respectively which are inclined slightly relative to the horizontal when the upper plate 12 is at the orientation seen in
The lower plate 14 is similar to the upper plate 12 except for the absence of the peripheral restraining structure 26. Thus, the lower plate 14 has an outer surface 40 which is planar, serrated and microfinished like the outer surface 18 of the upper plate 12. The lower plate 14 optionally carries a fin 42 similar to the fin 22 of the upper plate. The inner surface 44 of the lower plate 14 is concavely, spherically curved with a radius of curvature matching that of the inner surface 24 of the upper plate 12. Once again, this surface may be provided with a titanium nitride or other finish.
At the outer edge of the inner curved surface 44, the lower plate 14 is provided with an inclined ledge formation 46. Alternatively, the lower plate 14 may include peripheral restraining structure analogous to the peripheral restraining structure 26 on the upper plate 12.
The selected shock absorbing core 16 is symmetrical about a central, equatorial plane 52 which bisects it laterally. (Although in other embodiments, the selected shock absorbing core 16 may be asymmetrical.) Lying on this equatorial plane is an annular recess or groove 54 which extends about the periphery of the selected shock absorbing core. The groove 54 is defined between upper and lower ribs or lips 56. When the plates 12, 14 and selected shock absorbing core 16 are assembled and in the orientation seen in
The central axis of the disc 10 (the axis passing through the centers of curvature of the curved surfaces) is indicated with the reference numeral 62. As shown in
In use, the disc 10 is surgically implanted between adjacent spinal vertebrae in place of a damaged disc. The adjacent vertebrae are forcibly separated from one another to provide the necessary space for insertion. The disc 10 is typically, though not necessarily, advanced toward the disc space from an anterolateral or anterior approach and is inserted in a posterior direction—i.e., from anterior to posterior. The disc is inserted into place between the vertebrae with the fins 22, 42 of the plates 12, 14 entering slots cut in the opposing vertebral surfaces to receive them. During and/or after insertion, the vertebrae, facets, adjacent ligaments and soft tissues are allowed to move together to hold the disc in place. The serrated and microfinished surfaces 18, 40 of the plates 12, 14 locate against the opposing vertebrae. The serrations 20 and fins 22, 42 provide initial stability and fixation for the disc 10. With passage of time, enhanced by the titanium surface coating, firm connection between the plates and the vertebrae will be achieved as bone tissue grows over the serrated surface. Bone tissue growth will also take place about the fins 22, 40 and through the transverse holes 23 therein, further enhancing the connection which is achieved.
In the assembled disc 10, the complementary and cooperating spherical surfaces of the plates and selected shock absorbing core allow the plates to slide or articulate over the selected core through a fairly large range of angles and in all directions or degrees of freedom, including rotation about the central axis 62.
The flange 28 and the groove 54 defined between the ribs 56, prevent separation of the selected core from the plates. In other words, the cooperation of the retaining formations ensures that the selected shock absorbing core is held captive between the plates at all times during flexure of the disc 10.
In an alternative embodiment, the continuous annular flange 28 may be replaced by a retaining formation comprising a number of flange segments which are spaced apart circumferentially. Such an embodiment could include a single, continuous groove 54 as in the illustrated embodiment. Alternatively, a corresponding number of groove-like recesses spaced apart around the periphery of the selected core could be used, with each flange segment opposing one of the recesses. In another embodiment, the continuous flange or the plurality of flange segments could be replaced by inwardly directed pegs or pins carried by the upper plate 12. This embodiment could include a single, continuous groove 54 or a series of circumferentially spaced recesses with each pin or peg opposing a recess.
In yet another embodiment, the retaining formation(s) can be carried by the lower plate 14 instead of the upper plate, i.e. the plates are reversed. In some embodiments, the upper (or lower) plate is formed with an inwardly facing groove, or circumferentially spaced groove segments, at the edge of its inner, curved surface, and the outer periphery of the selected core is formed with an outwardly facing flange or with circumferentially spaced flange segments.
Referring now to
Upper component 70 and lower component 72 are configured to slide relative to one another. Upper component 70 comprises an upper slide structure, for example an inner annular sleeve 82. Lower component 72 comprises a lower slide structure, for example an outer annular sleeve 84. The upper slide structure mates with the lower slide structure, such that the two slide structures permit the upper component to slide relative to the lower component, for example with a telescopic slide mechanism 80.
In some embodiments, the sequential motion of the core parts relative to each other can change the volume chamber 71 so as to provide an inflow and outflow of bodily fluids between the sliding members of the core, such that the fluid flow provides and facilitates lubrication of the sliding members with bodily fluids.
When implanted between vertebrae, at least one of resilient material 74 or the at least one resilient member can resiliently absorb shocks transmitted vertically between upper and lower vertebrae of the patient's spinal column. This shock absorption is related to the material properties and dimensions of the resilient material and resilient members, for example Young's modulus of elasticity. In general, an increased thickness of the resilient material and/or members will increase absorbance of shocks, with more elastic, or springy compression between the vertebrae. In some embodiments, the resilient material may comprise a damping material and/or damping characteristics to improve shock absorption. For example, many resilient materials as described herein also comprise damping materials.
Selected shock absorbing core 16 comprises a height 78 and a width 58 that can be related to the shock absorbing characteristics of the core and/or prosthesis. In many embodiments, the core can absorb shocks to the vertebrae with compression along height 78, such that height 78 can decrease with compression of the core due to forces along the spine. As the thickness of the prosthesis is related to the height of the core, in some embodiments the height of the prosthesis will change with the core, for example decrease when the core is compressed. In many embodiments, the height of the prosthesis corresponds to a distance between serrated and microfinished surfaces 18, 40 of the plates 12, 14 that locate against the opposing vertebrae. In some embodiments, an increase of height 78 can increase shock absorption and resiliency of the core, for example with increased thickness of the shock absorbing materials and/or increased length of the resilient members, for example the resilient members such as compressible resilient springs. In some embodiments, width 58 of the selected core may also affect properties of the endplates.
Referring now to
First core 110A comprises an upper component 116A and a lower component 118A. A resilient material 112A is disposed between upper component 116A and lower component 118A. At least one resilient member 114A extends between upper component 116A and lower component 118A. First core 110A comprises a first height 122A. Resilient material 112A comprises a thickness 124A that corresponds to a length of at least one resilient member 114A. The resilience and shock absorption of first core 110A corresponds to thickness 124A, such that the resilience and shock absorption increase with increasing of thickness of 124A. First core 110A comprises an indicia, for example a marking 120A on the lower component to identify the first core, such that first core 110A can be identified and selected from among plurality 100.
Second core 110B comprises an upper component 116B and a lower component 118B. A resilient material 112B is disposed between upper component 116B and lower component 118B. At least one resilient member 114B extends between upper component 116B and lower component 118B. Second core 110B comprises a second height 122B. Resilient material 112B comprises a thickness 124B that corresponds to a length of at least one resilient member 114B. The resilience and shock absorption of second core 110B corresponds to thickness 124B, such that the resilience and shock absorption increase with increasing of thickness of 124B. Second core 110B comprises an indicia, for example a marking 120B on the lower component to identify the second core, such that second core 110B can be identified and selected from among plurality 100.
Third core 110C comprises an upper component 116C and a lower component 118C. A resilient material 112C is disposed between upper component 116C and lower component 118C. At least one resilient member 114C extends between upper component 116C and lower component 118C. Third core 110C comprises a third height 122C. Resilient material 112C comprises a thickness 124C that corresponds to a length of at least one resilient member 114C. The resilience and shock absorption of third core 110C corresponds to thickness 124C, such that the resilience and shock absorption increase with increasing thickness of 124C. Third core 110C comprises an indicia, for example a marking 120C on the lower component to identify the third core, such that third core 110C can be identified and selected from among plurality 100.
In many embodiments, some characteristics first core 110A, second core 110B and third core 110C are substantially the same, such that the cores are interchangeable. For example, a radius of curvature of the upper component of each core may be substantially the same, such that the plates articulate without point contact between the upper curve surface of the upper components. Resilient material 112A, resilient material 112B and resilient material 112C may comprise the substantially the same resilient material, for example an elastomer. In some embodiments, the curved surfaces of the lower components of each core may be substantially the same such that the selected core can slide over the bottom endplate.
In many embodiments, the cores may comprise predetermined characteristics that can be identified by the markings For example, third core 110C may comprise the most resilient core of the plurality with the most shock absorption, while first core 110A may comprise the least resilient core of the plurality with the least shock absorption. Also, third core 110C may comprise the core which provides the largest maximum angle of inclination between the plates of the plurality, while first core 110A may comprise core which provides the smallest angle of inclination between the plates.
In many embodiments, each core of the plurality of core comprises an intended maximum compression under normal patient activity. In some embodiments, first core 110A comprises a maximum compression of ⅓ mm along first height 122A with normal patient activity; second core 110B comprises a maximum compression of ⅔ mm along second height 122B with normal patient activity; and third core 110C comprises a maximum compression of 1 mm along third height 122C with normal patient activity. In some embodiments, the maximum compression can be limited with stops, for example maximum travel of inner sleeve 82 relative to outer sleeve 84 such that inner sleeve 82 on upper component 70 contacts lower core component 72 to limit compression. In some embodiments, the plurality of cores may comprise a substantially incompressible core, for example a core made entirely of metal, such as cobalt chrome. In such embodiments, the range of compression provided by the plurality of cores can be from about 0 mm to about 1 mm. A core with maximum compression of substantially zero may comprises a core made entirely from metal, for example cobalt chrome.
In some embodiments, the plurality of cores may comprise a constant height among the cores such that the maximum angle of inclination remains constant, while the shock absorption varies. In such embodiments, the thickness of the resilient material and/or thickness of the at least one resilient member differ among the cores of the plurality, while thicknesses of the upper and lower components differ so as to compensate for the different thicknesses of the resilient material and/or thickness of the at least one resilient member. Thus, the thicknesses of the cores among the plurality remain constant.
Referring now
First core 150A comprises an upper component 156A and a lower component 158A. A resilient material 152A is disposed between upper component 156A and lower component 158A. At least one resilient member 154A extends between upper component 156A and lower component 158A. First core 150A comprises a first height 162A and a first dimension across 166A, for example a diameter. Resilient material 152A comprises a thickness 164A that corresponds to a length of at least one resilient member 154A. The resilience and shock absorption of first core 160A corresponds to thickness 164A, such that the resilience and shock absorption increase with increasing of thickness 164A. First core 150A comprises an indicia, for example a marking 160A on the lower component to identify the first core, such that first core 150A can be identified and selected from among plurality 140.
Second core 150B comprises an upper component 156B and a lower component 158B. A resilient material 152B is disposed between upper component 156B and lower component 158B. At least one resilient member 154B extends between upper component 156B and lower component 158B. Second core 150B comprises a second height 162B and a second dimension across 166B, for example a diameter. Resilient material 152B comprises a thickness 164B that corresponds to a length of at least one resilient member 154B. The resilience and shock absorption of second core 160B corresponds to thickness 164B, such that the resilience and shock absorption increase with increasing of thickness 164B. Second core 150B comprises an indicia, for example a marking 160B on the lower component to identify the second core, such that second core 150B can be identified and selected from among plurality 140.
Third core 150C comprises an upper component 156C and a lower component 158C. A resilient material 152C is disposed between upper component 156C and lower component 158C. At least one resilient member 154C extends between upper component 156C and lower component 158C. Third core 150C comprises a third height 162C and a third dimension across 166C, for example a diameter. Resilient material 152C comprises a thickness 164C that corresponds to a length of at least one resilient member 154C. The resilience and shock absorption of third core 160C corresponds to thickness 164C, such that the resilience and shock absorption increase with increasing of thickness 164C. Third core 150C comprises an indicia, for example a marking 160C on the lower component to identify the second core, such that third core 150C can be identified and selected from among plurality 140.
The height of several cores of the plurality is substantially the same, such that the maximum angle of inclination between the plates is substantially the same for each of the several cores. In some embodiments, first height 162A, second height 162B and third height 162C are substantially the same, such that the maximum angle of inclination of the plates is substantially the same.
The each core of the plurality can be identified in many ways. In some embodiments, the core may comprise an indicia that comprises at least one of a color of the core, a marking on the core, a height of the core or a width of the core. The indicia may be located on the upper component of the core, or the lower component of the core.
The resilient material may comprise many known materials and may comprise at least one resilient material. In some embodiments, the at least one resilient material comprises a polymer. The at least one resilient material may comprise a hydrogel. The at least one resilient support member may be disposed within the resilient material and attached to the upper and lower components comprising the upper and lower curved surfaces.
In many embodiments, the upper and lower components and the curved surfaces formed thereon comprise at least one a polymer, a ceramic or a metal. The metal can comprise at least one of cobalt chrome molybdenum, titanium or stainless steel.
Referring now
Lower plate 220 can be attached to selected shock absorbing core 230 in many known ways. For example, the selected shock absorbing core can be attached to lower plate by locking the selected core into the lower plate with a detent. Lower plate 220 comprises threads 222 to attach the selected shock absorbing core to the lower plate, for example in the operating room before the prosthesis is inserted into the intervertebral space.
In some embodiments, the shock absorbing core can be inserted between the intervertebral plates after the plates have been inverted into the intervertebral space, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,936,071, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. The core can be compressed to a low profile configuration when the core is inserted between the plates to minimize distraction of the vertebrae when the core is inserted between the plates. Once the core is locked into position, the core can provide two piece ball and socket motion and shock absorption.
Shock absorbing core 230 comprises and an upper curved spherical surface 235. Upper plate 210 comprises a lower curved spherical surface 212. Upper curved spherical surface 235 and lower curved spherical surface 212 each comprises a radius of curvature. The radius of curvature of the upper curved spherical surface 235 and lower curved spherical surface 212 are substantially the same, such that the upper and lower curved surfaces form a ball and socket joint, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,740,118, the full disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. In some embodiments, the selected shock absorbing core comprises and indicia to identify the core, for example a letter etched in upper curved spherical surface 235.
The upper plate 310 and lower plate 320 are sized to nest together when inserted into the intervertebral space, as indicated by lines 340. Once the upper and lower plates are positioned together in the intervertebral space, selected shock absorbing core 330 can be slid between upper plate 310 and lower plate 320 as indicated by lines 350. Channel 322 receives the selected shock absorbing core and flange 334. When the selected shock absorbing core is positioned in the lower plate, detent 332 extends into indentation 326 so as to lock the selected shock absorbing core into position in lower plate 320.
Channel 312, channel 314 and channel 324 are sized to receive prongs of an insertion tool, for example as describe in U.S. Pat. No. 5,314,477, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. In some embodiments, the channels on the upper and lower plate receive an instrument that presses the upper and lower plates together so as to compress core 330 and minimize distraction when the core is inserted between the upper and lower plates while the plates are position in the intervertebral space.
Referring now to
The prosthesis 404 may be inserted as far into the intervertebral space IS under constraint as is desired. In some embodiments, for example, the prosthesis 404 is inserted under constraint approximately one-third of the way into the space IS. In other embodiments, the prosthesis 404 may be inserted less than one-third of the way, closer to one-half of the way, or any other suitable distance into the space IS.
As shown in
Referring now to
By inserting the prosthesis 404 farther into the space IS while it is unconstrained and compressing the shock absorbing core, thus allowing the endplates 406 to articulate about the shock absorbing core 412 and come closer together, the method reduces the need for increasing the height of the intervertebral space IS with distraction of the vertebrae V away from each other. Because the endplates 406 are free to articulate and can compress the shock absorbing core 416 to move the plates together, the prosthesis 404 is better able to conform to the intervertebral space IS, thus reducing trauma to the vertebrae V and also limiting trauma to surrounding structures caused by over-distraction.
The unconstrained prosthesis 404 may be inserted as far into the intervertebral space IS as is desired. In some embodiments, for example, the prosthesis 404 is pushed far enough into the space IS so that a center of rotation of the prosthesis 404 is closer to a posterior edge P (
In various embodiments, the method just described may include fewer steps or additional steps. For example, in one embodiment, a spreader device is inserted between the two vertebrae V to spread them apart before inserting the constrained prosthesis 404. An example of such a spacing device is described in PCT Patent Application No. 2004/000171, the full disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. In such embodiments, the insertion device 402 can be sized to fit between opposing jaws of the spreader device, such that the jaws can compress the shock absorbing core so as to minimize distraction. When the prosthesis 404 is partially inserted, the spreader device is removed from the intervertebral space IS, and the prosthesis 404 is released from constraint and inserted the rest of the way into the space IS. Also in some embodiments, a midline indicator device may be used to facilitate the location of a midline on one or both of the two adjacent vertebrae V. An example of such a midline indicator device is described in PCT Patent Application No. 2004/000170, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. In some embodiments, the midline indicator can be used before the disc prosthesis 404 is inserted. These and other steps or features may be included in various embodiments of the method without departing from the scope of the invention.
The channels in the upper and lower components and resilient material in core 500 permit fluid to pass through the core while the patient is stationary and can pump fluid through the core during patient activity. Work in relation to embodiments of the present invention suggests that static accumulation of bodily fluids in the core may occur. By passing fluid through the core, bacteria build up due to static enclosed fluids may be avoided. When upper component 570 moves toward lower component 572 a volume of chamber 502 decreases so as to drive fluid, for example bodily fluid from chamber 502. When the upper component 520 moves away from lower component 572, the volume of chamber 502 increases so as to draw fluid into the chamber. As an active person will resiliently compress and expand core 500 with activity, core 500 can pump fluid in and out of the core by moving the upper and lower components toward and away from each other with patient movement. In many embodiments, the channels are large enough to enable fluid flow, and small enough to inhibit tissue in growth that may compromise the shock absorbing motion of the core. The number of channels in the upper and lower components and/or resilient material can be selected so as to enable fluid flow and not weaken the core structures.
Instrument 600 comprises a compression spring 615 that presses handles 610 apart, so as to oppose inward motion of the handles. By forcing handles 610 apart, compression spring 615 can close distractor tip 630 so as to compress the core to a narrow profile configuration.
Instrument 600 is adapted to pass the prostheses in an elongate narrow profile configuration into the intervertebral space. Distractor tip 630 comprises a channel 640 with grooves 642 formed therein. Channel 640 is dimensioned to pass the prosthesis in an elongate narrow profile configuration. Grooves 642 are dimensioned and spaced to receive anchors on the external surfaces of the support components, for example pyramidal components as described above. In some embodiments, the anchors may comprise elongate pyramidal anchors and or elongate keels or flanges and the grooves adapted to pass the elongate anchors with the groove aligned with the elongate anchor. In many embodiments, channel 640 is sized to distract the vertebrae with distractor tip 630 while the elongate prosthesis slides down channel 640. Near hinge 620, channel 640 can be sized to pass the prosthesis with a sliding fit.
Instrument 600 comprises an insertion tool 650 to advance the prosthesis along channel 640 so as to advance the prosthesis into the intervertebral space. Insertion tool 650 comprises a shaft 654 and a handle 652. Handle 652 is connected to shaft 654. In many embodiments handle 652 comprises a grub screw, and handle 652 and shaft 654 comprise strong materials such that handle 652 can be hammered so as to drive the prosthesis distally into the intervertebral space and distract the vertebrae with separation of distal tip 630. Compression spring 1651 can expand to force handles 610 open and close distractor tip 630 so as to press the upper and lower supports of the prosthesis together and compress the selected shock absorbing core. This compression of the shock absorbing core can reduce the height of the prosthesis and reduce distraction of the intervertebral space and/or surrounding tissues when the implant is inserted into the intervertebral space.
The selectable shock absorbing cores and insertion tool may comprise a system for narrow profile insertion of the prosthesis into the intervertebral space so as to minimize distraction. The compression spring can compress the shock absorbing prosthesis to a narrow profile configuration. Although a compression spring is shown, many springs and/or resilient members and/or materials can be used to compress the prosthesis to a narrow profile configuration, for example resilient materials and members similar to those used in the core as described above. In many embodiments, the selected core provides maximum compression within a range from about ⅓ mm to about 1 mm during patient activity, and the narrow profile configuration of the core comprises a maximum compression of the core, for example ⅓ mm, ⅔ mm or 1 mm, depending on the core as described above. In many embodiments, an expanded configuration of the core comprises an unloaded configuration of the core. In many embodiments, the resilient member and/or material is connected to the distractor tips so as to compress the selected shock absorbing prosthesis and/or core to the narrow profile configuration, for example with maximum compression of the core as described above, when the core is positioned in the channel for insertion into the patient.
Outer cartridge casing 820 extends over at least a portion of intervertebral joint assembly to permit advancement of the joint assembly into at least a portion of the intervertebral space while the joint assembly is substantially covered with outer cartridge casing 820. Outer cartridge casing 820 covers pyramidal anchors 712 and pyramidal anchors 714. Distal component 720 of upper support 702 and distal component 730 of lower support 704 are located near an opening in outer cartridge casing 820. Inner cartridge part 830 includes a wedge 832, upper flange 836 and lower flange 838. The upper and lower flanges include inner opposing surfaces, and the inner surface of each flange opposes one of the wedge surfaces to clamp the components of the upper and lower supports in a parallel configuration Inner cartridge part 830 is connected to shaft 840.
Self expanding intervertebral joint assembly 700 includes structures to permit articulation between upper support 702 and lower support 704 to restore motion between the vertebrae. Upper support 702 has a protruding structure 725 which extends from middle component 724 and has a concave surface feature formed therein, as shown herein above, which mates the upper surface of shock absorbing biconvex core 706. Lower support 704 has a protruding structure 735 which extends from middle component 734 and has a concave surface feature formed therein, which mates the lower surface of shock absorbing biconvex core 706. In an alternate embodiment, the features of the upper and lower support are in direct contact and mate to provide articulation. For example, the upper support can have a protrusion with a convex surface, and the lower support can have a protrusion with a concave surface, in which the two surfaces mate to form a load bearing articulate joint.
Protruding structure 725 and protruding structure 726 can also include structures to retain the shock absorbing biconvex core and upper and lower retention ring gears, respectively. In many embodiments, shock absorbing core 607 comprises an annular channel 707 around the periphery of the shock absorbing core Annular channel 707 is sized to receive retention ring structures of the upper and lower plates, so as to retain the shock absorbing core between the plates.
Protruding structure 725 can include a retention ring, rim or annular flange as described above such as an annular flange 770 that projects radially inward toward shock absorbing biconvex core 706 to retain shock absorbing biconvex core 706. Protruding structure 735 can include a radially inwardly projecting retention ring, rim or annular flange such as an annular flange 771 that extends toward shock absorbing biconvex core 706 to retain shock absorbing biconvex core 706. Annular flange 770 has a bevel 772 formed thereon to limit motion between the upper and lower supports. Annular flange 771 has a bevel 773 formed thereon to limit motion between the upper and lower supports. Bevel 772 and bevel 773 can be inclined so as to avoid point loading when the upper and lower supports are a the maximum angle of inclination. Annular flange 770 and annular flange 771 can extend into annular channel 701 to retain the core. In some embodiments, the plates as described above include an upper retention ring and a lower retention ring with each of the upper and lower retention rings shaped to engage an annular channel of the core so as to retain the core between the plates.
Retention ring gear 716 can have an annular shape formed to mate with protruding structure 725. Protruding structure 725 can include an outer circular surface that mates with an inner surface of inner annular surface of retention ring gear 716. Retention ring gear 716 can rotate around protruding structure 725. In addition to inwardly protruding annular flange 770 that retains shock absorbing biconvex core 706, protruding structure 725 can include a retention element 775 such as an outwardly protruding annular flange and/or C-ring clip to retain retention ring gear 716.
Retention ring gear 718 can also have an annular shape formed to mate with protruding structure 735. Protruding structure 735 can include an outer circular surface that mates with an inner annular surface of retention ring gear 718. Retention ring gear 718 can rotate around protruding structure 735. In addition to an inwardly protruding annular flange that retains shock absorbing biconvex core 706, protruding structure 735 can include an outwardly protruding retention element 775 such as an annular flange and/or C-ring clip to retain retention ring gear 718.
Implant 700 can include structures that pivot while the upper and lower supports are formed. A pivot gear 727 can engage upper retention ring gear 716. Pivot gear 727 is connected to joint 726 so that rotation of pivot gear 727 rotates pivot joint 726 to rotate distal component 720. A pivot joint 728 connects proximal component 722 to middle component 724 of upper support 702. Rotation about pivot joint 728 pivots middle component 724 toward the deployed position. A pivot gear 737 can engage lower retention ring gear 718. Pivot gear 737 is connected to pivot joint 736 so that rotation of pivot gear 737 rotates pivot joint 736 to rotate distal component 704 toward the deployed position. A pivot joint 738 connects proximal component 732 to middle component 734 of lower support 704. Rotation about pivot joint 738 pivots middle component 734 toward the deployed position.
Wedge 832, upper flange 836 and lower flange 838 restrain motion of the joint assembly during deployment by clamping the joint assembly while the joint assembly is advanced. Wedge 832 is positioned between upper support 702 and lower support 704. Wedge 832 and upper flange 836 engage proximal component 722 of upper support 702. Wedge 832 and lower flange 838 engage proximal component 732 of lower support 704. Inwardly facing projections are provided on the ends of the upper flange 836 and lower flange 838. Advancement of inner cartridge part 830 advances wedge 832, upper, the upper and lower supports distally to engage gears of the support.
In many embodiments, the shock absorbing core can be compressed with an instrument during insertion to allow for a lower profile during insertion. For example, casing 810 of cartridge 800 can be sized to compress the core during insertion so as to lower the profile of the core. The core can also be compressed during insertion through a tube, sleeve, or the like such that core assumes a low profile compressed configuration during insertion so as to minimize the invasiveness of the procedure, for example with a posterior lateral Wiltse approach as described in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/787,110, entitled “Posterior Spinal Device and Method”, filed Apr. 12, 2007, the full disclosure of which has previously been incorporated herein by reference. In some embodiments, the core and/or prosthesis can be compressed with forceps while inserted into the intervertebral space.
While the exemplary embodiments have been described in some detail, by way of example and for clarity of understanding, those of skill in the art will recognize that a variety of modifications, adaptations, and changes may be employed. Hence, the scope of the present invention should be limited solely by the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/795,184, filed Oct. 26, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/606,587, filed May 26, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,827,108, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/368,437, filed Dec. 2, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,687,355, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/941,121, filed Jul. 12, 2013, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/883,068, filed Sep. 15, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,506,631, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/836,684, filed Aug. 9, 2007; the full disclosures of each are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3486505 | Gordon | Dec 1969 | A |
3867728 | Stubstad et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
4309777 | Patil | Jan 1982 | A |
4531917 | Linkow et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4566466 | Ripple et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4619660 | Christiansen et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4673407 | Martin | Jun 1987 | A |
4759766 | Buettner-Janz et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4759769 | Hedman et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4834757 | Brantigan | May 1989 | A |
4863477 | Monson | Sep 1989 | A |
4904261 | Dove et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4917704 | Frey et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4932969 | Frey et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4946378 | Hirayama et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4997432 | Keller et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5035716 | Downey | Jul 1991 | A |
5057108 | Shetty et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5071437 | Steffee | Dec 1991 | A |
5122130 | Keller | Jun 1992 | A |
5195526 | Michelson | Mar 1993 | A |
5258031 | Salib et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5282661 | Arnberger | Feb 1994 | A |
5306308 | Gross et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5314477 | Marnay | May 1994 | A |
5320644 | Baumgartner | Jun 1994 | A |
5370697 | Baumgartner et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5394457 | Leibinger et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5401269 | Buettner-Janz et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5415704 | Davidson | May 1995 | A |
5458642 | Beer et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5462575 | Del Corso | Oct 1995 | A |
5484437 | Michelson | Jan 1996 | A |
5489307 | Kuslich et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5505732 | Michelson | Apr 1996 | A |
5507816 | Bullivant | Apr 1996 | A |
5534030 | Navarro et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5556431 | Büttner-Janz | Sep 1996 | A |
5665122 | Kambin | Sep 1997 | A |
5674296 | Bryan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5676701 | Yuan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5676702 | Ratron | Oct 1997 | A |
5683465 | Shinn et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5702450 | Bisserie | Dec 1997 | A |
5709683 | Bagby | Jan 1998 | A |
5728159 | Stroever et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741253 | Michelson | Apr 1998 | A |
5776198 | Rabbe et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782832 | Larsen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5797909 | Michelson | Aug 1998 | A |
5824094 | Serhan et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5836948 | Zucherman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5865846 | Bryan et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5865848 | Baker | Feb 1999 | A |
5888226 | Rogozinski | Mar 1999 | A |
5895428 | Berry | Apr 1999 | A |
5899901 | Middleton | May 1999 | A |
5899911 | Carter | May 1999 | A |
5928284 | Mehdizadeh | Jul 1999 | A |
5989251 | Nichols | Nov 1999 | A |
5989291 | Ralph et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6001130 | Bryan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6019792 | Cauthen | Feb 2000 | A |
6022376 | Assell et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039761 | Li et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039763 | Shelokov | Mar 2000 | A |
6080155 | Michelson | Jun 2000 | A |
6083228 | Michelson | Jul 2000 | A |
6086613 | Camino et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096038 | Michelson | Aug 2000 | A |
6102950 | Vaccaro | Aug 2000 | A |
6132465 | Ray et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136031 | Middleton | Oct 2000 | A |
6139551 | Michelson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139579 | Steffee et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143033 | Paul et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6146421 | Gordon et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156067 | Bryan et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159214 | Michelson | Dec 2000 | A |
6162252 | Kuras et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6174311 | Branch et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176881 | Schaer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193757 | Foley et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6224595 | Michelson | May 2001 | B1 |
6224607 | Michelson | May 2001 | B1 |
6231609 | Mehdizadeh | May 2001 | B1 |
6235030 | Zucherman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6261296 | Aebi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264695 | Stoy | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6290726 | Pope et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296664 | Middleton | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315797 | Middleton | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322567 | Mittelstadt et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336941 | Subba et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348071 | Steffee et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6368350 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368351 | Glenn et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375681 | Truscott | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375682 | Fleischmann et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6395032 | Gauchet | May 2002 | B1 |
6402785 | Zdeblick et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409766 | Brett | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413278 | Marchosky | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6416551 | Keller | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436098 | Michelson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440139 | Michelson | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6447544 | Michelson | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6478800 | Fraser et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6517544 | Michelson | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517580 | Ramadan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6520967 | Cauthen | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6520996 | Manasas et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527804 | Gauchet et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6533817 | Norton et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537279 | Michelson | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6554863 | Paul et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6562047 | Ralph et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6562074 | Gerbec et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6565574 | Michelson | May 2003 | B2 |
6582466 | Gauchet | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582468 | Gauchet | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6592624 | Fraser et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6599294 | Fuss et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607558 | Kuras | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6607559 | Ralph et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6610092 | Ralph et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6623525 | Ralph et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6645248 | Casutt | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648895 | Burkus et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652533 | O'Neil | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6660038 | Boyer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6666866 | Martz et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669731 | Ralph et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669732 | Serhan et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6673113 | Ralph et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682562 | Viart et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6689132 | Biscup | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6706068 | Ferree | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709439 | Rogers et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712819 | Zucherman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712825 | Aebi et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719794 | Gerber et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6723097 | Fraser et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726720 | Ross et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726721 | Stoy et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6733532 | Gauchet et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6740118 | Eisermann et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6740119 | Ralph et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6752832 | Neumann | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755841 | Fraser et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764512 | Keller | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764515 | Ralph et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770095 | Grinberg et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790233 | Brodke et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6793678 | Hawkins | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6814737 | Cauthen | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821298 | Jackson | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6827740 | Michelson | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6830570 | Frey et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6846328 | Cauthen | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6852126 | Ahlgren | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863673 | Gerbec et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875213 | Michelson | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6896680 | Michelson | May 2005 | B2 |
6899735 | Coates et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6936071 | Marnay et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6936132 | Topolnitsky | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6964686 | Gordon | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6966929 | Mitchell | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6966931 | Huang | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6986788 | Paul et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6989011 | Paul et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994727 | Khandkar et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7011684 | Eckman | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022138 | Mashburn | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025787 | Bryan et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7044983 | Cheng | May 2006 | B1 |
7056344 | Huppert et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7060073 | Frey et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066958 | Ferree | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7081120 | Li et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083651 | Diaz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7087055 | Lim et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097648 | Globerman et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7115132 | Errico et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7118580 | Beyersdorff et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7147665 | Bryan et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7153325 | Kim et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7169182 | Errico et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7179294 | Eisermann et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7182784 | Evans et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7198644 | Schultz et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207991 | Michelson | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7214244 | Zubok et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7217291 | Zucherman et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7235082 | Bartish et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235103 | Rivin | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7250060 | Trieu | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7255714 | Malek | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7261739 | Ralph et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7267688 | Ferree | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7270679 | Istephanous et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7270682 | Frigg et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7303582 | Brady et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7303583 | Schaer et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7318839 | Malberg et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7326250 | Beaurain et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7331995 | Eisermann et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7429270 | Baumgartner | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7442211 | de Villiers et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7452380 | Zubok et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7491241 | Errico et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7494508 | Zeegers et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7517363 | Rogers et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7549995 | Schultz | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7563286 | Gerber et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7601174 | Kelly et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7621856 | Keith | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7682396 | Beaurain | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7708776 | Blain et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7731753 | Reo et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7909876 | Dooris et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7917374 | Walker | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8038715 | Kim et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8277508 | Trieu | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8388681 | Paul et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8506631 | De et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8858635 | Hovorka | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9554917 | De et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9687355 | De et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
10548739 | Villiers | Feb 2020 | B2 |
20010016773 | Serhan et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010029377 | Aebi et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020022845 | Zdeblick et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020035400 | Bryan et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045904 | Fuss et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020068936 | Burkus et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091392 | Michelson | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020116009 | Fraser et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123753 | Michelson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020128714 | Manasas | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020128715 | Bryan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020130112 | Manasas | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020165550 | Frey et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177897 | Michelson | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020198532 | Michelson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009224 | Kuras | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023245 | Ralph et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028249 | Baccelli et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040746 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045884 | Robie et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030045939 | Casutt | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074076 | Ferree et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083747 | Winterbottom et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030100951 | Serhan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030125739 | Bagga et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130662 | Michelson | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135277 | Bryan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139812 | Garcia et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030187448 | Michelson | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191536 | Ferree | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195517 | Michelson | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195631 | Ferree | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199982 | Bryan | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204261 | Eisermann et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208271 | Kuras | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229358 | Errico et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233145 | Landry et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002761 | Rogers et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024407 | Ralph et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040024410 | Olson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030391 | Ferree | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034426 | Errico et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040054411 | Kelly et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059318 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073307 | Keller | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073311 | Ferree | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073312 | Eisermann et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093087 | Ferree et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040097928 | Zdeblick et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098131 | Bryan et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117021 | Biedermann et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040143270 | Zucherman et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143332 | Krueger et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143334 | Ferree | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167626 | Geremakis et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040176843 | Zubok et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186569 | Berry | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040215342 | Suddaby | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225295 | Zubok et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225365 | Eisermann et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236426 | Ralph et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243238 | Arnin et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254644 | Taylor | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015094 | Keller | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015095 | Keller | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015152 | Sweeney | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021145 | De et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021146 | De et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027360 | Webb et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038515 | Kunzler | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043800 | Paul et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050107881 | Alleyne et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113842 | Bertagnoli et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113928 | Cragg et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050143824 | Richelsoph et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149189 | Mokhtar et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154463 | Trieu | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165408 | Puno et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171604 | Michalow | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192586 | Zucherman et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050192670 | Zubok et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197702 | Coppes et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197703 | Diaz et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197706 | Hovorka et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216081 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216084 | Fleischmann et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234553 | Gordon | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251260 | Gerber | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251261 | Peterman | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251262 | De et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261772 | Filippi | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267580 | Suddaby | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267581 | Marnay et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004377 | Keller | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060004453 | Bartish et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015183 | Gilbert et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020342 | Ferree et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025862 | Villiers et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029186 | De et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030857 | De et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030862 | De et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036325 | Paul et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041313 | Allard et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041314 | Millard | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052870 | Ferree | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064169 | Ferree | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069439 | Zucherman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060116768 | Krueger et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142858 | Colleran et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142862 | Diaz et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155378 | Eckman | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167549 | Mathys et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060178744 | De et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178746 | Bartish et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195097 | Evans et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200239 | Rothman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224241 | Butler et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235426 | Lim et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235525 | Gil et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235527 | Buettner-Janz et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241641 | Albans et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241766 | Felton et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259144 | Trieu | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259146 | Navarro et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265068 | Schwab | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265077 | Zwirkoski | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287728 | Mokhtar et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293752 | Moumene et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293753 | Thramann | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293754 | Devilliers et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070010826 | Rhoda et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021837 | Ashman | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070032875 | Blacklock et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070067035 | Falahee | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067036 | Hudgins et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073398 | Fabian et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093898 | Schwab et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100453 | Parsons et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070100454 | Burgess et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070100456 | Dooris et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123903 | Raymond et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123904 | Stad et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070135923 | Peterman et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162133 | Doubler et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168033 | Kim et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168036 | Ainsworth et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179615 | Heinz et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185578 | O'Neil et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213821 | Kwak et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233077 | Khalili | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233247 | Schwab | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233248 | Schwab et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233251 | Abdou | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270970 | Trieu | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282449 | De et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299521 | Glenn et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015698 | Marino et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015701 | Garcia et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021557 | Trieu | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080051900 | De et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051901 | De et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080125864 | De et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125865 | Abdelgany et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133011 | De et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154301 | De et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154382 | De et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080215155 | De et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221696 | De et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228274 | De et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228277 | De et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080294259 | De et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090043391 | De et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090048674 | Zubok et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090048677 | McLeod et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090076614 | Arramon | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090105833 | Hovda et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105834 | Hovda et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105835 | Hovda et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090192617 | Arramon et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090205188 | De et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090210060 | De et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222101 | De et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090276051 | Arramon et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090281629 | Roebling | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090326656 | De et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004746 | Arramon | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016972 | Jansen et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016973 | De et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030335 | Arramon | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049040 | De et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100069976 | De et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076558 | De et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100087868 | Barr et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100179419 | De et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110004313 | De et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110040386 | Kim | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110270261 | Mast et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276141 | Caratsch | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130023990 | Zipnick | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130103153 | Blackwell | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130110240 | Hansell | May 2013 | A1 |
20130297026 | De et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140249631 | Weiman | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150148908 | Marino et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20170079809 | De et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20190201210 | Besaw | Jul 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3023353 | Apr 1981 | DE |
10035182 | Feb 2002 | DE |
0333990 | Sep 1989 | EP |
0333990 | May 1990 | EP |
0560140 | Sep 1993 | EP |
0560141 | Sep 1993 | EP |
0591712 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0820740 | Jan 1998 | EP |
1142544 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1153582 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1153582 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1250898 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1306064 | May 2003 | EP |
1344493 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1344506 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1344507 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1344508 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1417940 | May 2004 | EP |
1570813 | Sep 2005 | EP |
2803741 | Jul 2001 | FR |
S61122859 | Jun 1986 | JP |
S63164948 | Jul 1988 | JP |
WO-9920209 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-9930651 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO-0004851 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO-0035384 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO-0042954 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO-0042954 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-0101893 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO-0115637 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO-0168003 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO-0211650 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO-0211650 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO-2004000170 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO-2004000171 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO-2004026187 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO-2004041131 | May 2004 | WO |
WO-2004054477 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO-2004066884 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO-2004041131 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO-2005004756 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO-2005004756 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2005053580 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO-2005072662 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO-2005112833 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO-2005112834 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO-2005112834 | May 2006 | WO |
WO-2006119092 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2006119092 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO-2007121320 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO-2007121320 | Jun 2008 | WO |
200603171 | Sep 2007 | ZA |
Entry |
---|
Buttner-Janz, The Development of the Artificial Disc. Introduction, pp. 1-18, Library of Congress Catalogue No. 92-75582, ISBN 0-9635430-0-8 (1989). |
Hellier, et al., Wear Studies for Development of an Intervertebral Disc Prosthesis. Spine, vol. 17 No. 6 Supplement pp. 86-96 (1992). |
International search report and written opinion dated Dec. 23, 2008 for PCT/US2008/071551. |
Lee, et al. Impact Response of the Intervertebral Disc in a Finite-Element Model. Spine. 2000; 25(19):2431-2439. |
Lehuec, et al. Shock Absorption in Lumber Disc Prosthesis. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques. 2003; 16(4):346-351. |
Notice of allowance dated Apr. 16, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/883,068. |
“Notice of allowance dated May 15, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/368,437”. |
“Notice of allowance dated Sep. 12, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/606,587”. |
Notice of allowance dated Oct. 12, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/941,121. |
“Office action dated Feb. 4, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/941,121.”. |
Office action dated Mar. 12, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/883,068. |
Office action dated Apr. 28, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/836,684. |
Office action dated Oct. 15, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/883,068. |
Office action dated Jul. 15, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/941,121. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200107939 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12883068 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 13941121 | US | |
Parent | 11836684 | Aug 2007 | US |
Child | 12883068 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15795184 | Oct 2017 | US |
Child | 16705894 | US | |
Parent | 15606587 | May 2017 | US |
Child | 15795184 | US | |
Parent | 15368437 | Dec 2016 | US |
Child | 15606587 | US | |
Parent | 13941121 | Jul 2013 | US |
Child | 15368437 | US |