Customized patient-specific tibial cutting blocks

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates generally to customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instruments and to methods, devices, and systems for fabricating and positioning such instruments.

BACKGROUND

Joint arthroplasty is a well-known surgical procedure by which a diseased and/or damaged natural joint is replaced by a prosthetic joint. A typical knee prosthesis includes a tibial tray, a femoral component, a polymer insert or bearing positioned between the tibial tray and the femoral component, and, in some cases, a polymer patella button. To facilitate the replacement of the natural joint with the knee prosthesis, orthopaedic surgeons use a variety of orthopaedic surgical instruments such as, for example, cutting blocks, drill guides, milling guides, and other surgical instruments. Typically, the orthopaedic surgical instruments are generic with respect to the patient such that the same orthopaedic surgical instrument may be used on a number of different patients during similar orthopaedic surgical procedures.

SUMMARY

According to one aspect, a customized patient-specific tibial cutting block includes a body having a bone-facing surface that has a customized patient-specific negative contour configured to receive (i) a portion of an anterior side of a patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour, and (ii) a portion of a medial side of the patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour. When viewed superiorly, an angle greater than zero is defined between a vertically-extending, bisecting plane of the body and a bisecting sagittal plane of the patient's tibia when the portions of the patient's tibia are received in the customized patient-specific negative contour of the body. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block also includes at least one tab extending posteriorly from the body that has a bone-facing surface having a customized patient-specific negative contour configured to receive a portion of the proximal side of the patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour.

The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block may include a first tab extending posteriorly from the body and a second tab extending posteriorly from the body. Each of the first tab and the second tab has a bone-facing surface having a customized patient-specific negative contour configured to receive a respective portion of the proximal end of the patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour. The first tab and the second tab may define an opening therebetween.

The body of the customized patient-specific tibial cutting block has a cutting slot defined therein. The cutting slot is positioned to allow a surgeon to perform a proximal cut on the patient's tibia using the cutting slot.

The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block may also include a cutting guide coupled to the body. The cutting guide has a cutting slot defined therein and is formed from a material different from the body and being positioned to allow a surgeon to perform a proximal cut on the patient's tibia using the cutting slot. The cutting guide may be formed from a metallic material and is overmolded to the body of the customized patient-specific femoral cutting block.

The longitudinal axis of the cutting slot may define a substantially perpendicular angle with the vertically-extending, bisecting plane of the body. Alternatively, the longitudinal axis of the cutting slot may define a substantially perpendicular angle with the bisecting sagittal plane of the patient's tibia when the portions of the patient's tibia are received in the customized patient-specific negative contour of the body.

The angle defined between the vertically-extending, bisecting plane of the body and the bisecting sagittal plane of the patient's tibia may be between ten degrees and thirty degrees. In one example, the angle defined between the vertically-extending, bisecting plane of the body and the bisecting sagittal plane of the patient's tibia is about twenty degrees.

According to another aspect, a customized patient-specific tibial cutting block includes a body having a bone-facing surface that has a customized patient-specific negative contour configured to receive (i) a portion of an anterior side of a patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour, and (ii) a portion of a medial side of the patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour. When viewed superiorly, an angle greater than zero is defined between a vertically-extending, bisecting plane of the body and a bisecting sagittal plane of the patient's tibia when the portions of the patient's tibia are received in the customized patient-specific negative contour of the body. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block also includes a cutting guide coupled to the body. The cutting guide includes a cutting slot that has a longitudinal axis that defines a substantially perpendicular angle with the vertically-extending, bisecting plane of the body. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block also includes at least one tab extending posteriorly from the body having a bone-facing surface that has a customized patient-specific negative contour configured to receive a portion of the proximal side of the patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour.

The cutting guide may be formed from a metallic material and is overmolded to the body of the customized patient-specific femoral cutting block.

According to another aspect, a customized patient-specific tibial cutting block includes a body having a bone-facing surface that has a customized patient-specific negative contour configured to receive (i) a portion of an anterior side of a patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour, and (ii) a portion of a medial side of the patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour. When viewed superiorly, an angle greater than zero is defined between a vertically-extending, bisecting plane of the body and a bisecting sagittal plane of the patient's tibia when the portions of the patient's tibia are received in the customized patient-specific negative contour of the body. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block also includes a cutting guide coupled to the body. The cutting guide includes a cutting slot that has a longitudinal axis that defines a substantially perpendicular angle with the bisecting sagittal plane of the patient's tibia when the portions of the patient's tibia are received in the customized patient-specific negative contour of the body. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block also includes at least one tab extending posteriorly from the body having a bone-facing surface that has a customized patient-specific negative contour configured to receive a portion of the proximal side of the patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour.

The cutting guide may be formed from a metallic material and is overmolded to the body of the customized patient-specific femoral cutting block.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The detailed description particularly refers to the following figures, in which:

FIG. 1 is a simplified flow diagram of an algorithm for designing and fabricating a customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument;

FIG. 2 is a simplified flow diagram of a method for generating a model of a patient-specific orthopaedic instrument;

FIG. 3 is a simplified flow diagram of a method for scaling a reference contour;

FIGS. 4-6 are three-dimensional model's of a patient's tibia;

FIG. 7-9 are three-dimensional models of a patient's femur;

FIG. 10 is an anterior elevation an embodiment of a customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument;

FIG. 11 is a top plan view of the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument of FIG. 10;

FIG. 12 is side elevation view of the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument of FIG. 10;

FIG. 13 shows the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument of FIG. 10 secured to the tibia of a patient, as viewed superiorly; and

FIG. 14 is a view similar to FIG. 13, but showing another embodiment of the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

While the concepts of the present disclosure are susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific exemplary embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that there is no intent to limit the concepts of the present disclosure to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Terms representing anatomical references, such as anterior, posterior, medial, lateral, superior, inferior, etcetera, may be used throughout this disclosure in reference to the orthopaedic implants and instruments described herein, along with a patient's natural anatomy. Such terms have well-understood meanings in both the study of anatomy and the field of orthopaedics. Use of such anatomical reference terms in the specification and claims is intended to be consistent with their well-understood meanings unless noted otherwise.

Referring to FIG. 1, an algorithm 10 for fabricating a customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument is illustrated. What is meant herein by the term “customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument” is a surgical tool for use by a surgeon in performing an orthopaedic surgical procedure that is intended, and configured, for use on a particular patient. As such, it should be appreciated that, as used herein, the term “customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument” is distinct from standard, non-patient specific orthopaedic surgical instruments that are intended for use on a variety of different patients. Additionally, it should be appreciated that, as used herein, the term “customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument” is distinct from orthopaedic prostheses, whether patient-specific or generic, which are surgically implanted in the body of the patient. Rather, customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instruments are used by an orthopaedic surgeon to assist in the implantation of orthopaedic prostheses.

In some embodiments, the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument may be customized to the particular patient based on the location at which the instrument is to be coupled to one or more bones of the patient, such as the femur and/or tibia. For example, in some embodiments, the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument may include a bone-contacting or facing surface having a negative contour that matches or substantially matches the contour of a portion of the relevant bone of the patient. As such, the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument is configured to be coupled to the bone of a patient in a unique location and position with respect to the patient's bone. That is, the negative contour of the bone-contacting surface is configured to receive the matching contour surface of the portion of the patient's bone. As such, the orthopaedic surgeon's guesswork and/or intra-operative decision-making with respect to the placement of the orthopaedic surgical instrument are reduced. For example, the orthopaedic surgeon may not be required to locate landmarks of the patient's bone to facilitate the placement of the orthopaedic surgical instrument, which typically requires some amount of estimation on part of the surgeon. Rather, the orthopaedic surgeon may simply couple the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument on the bone or bones of the patient in the unique location. When so coupled, the cutting plane, drilling holes, milling holes, and/or other guides are defined in the proper location relative to the bone and intended orthopaedic prosthesis. The customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument may be embodied as any type of orthopaedic surgical instrument such as, for example, a bone-cutting block, a drilling guide, a milling guide, or other type of orthopaedic surgical instrument configured to be coupled to a bone of a patient.

As shown in FIG. 1, the algorithm 10 includes process steps 12 and 14, in which an orthopaedic surgeon performs pre-operative planning of the orthopaedic surgical procedure to be performed on a patient. The process steps 12 and 14 may be performed in any order or contemporaneously with each other. In process step 12, a number of medical images of the relevant bony anatomy or joint of the patient are generated. To do so, the orthopaedic surgeon or other healthcare provider may operate an imaging system to generate the medical images. The medical images may be embodied as any number and type of medical images capable of being used to generate a three-dimensional rendered model of the patient's bony anatomy or relevant joint. For example, the medical images may be embodied as any number of computed tomography (CT) images, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images, or other three-dimensional medical images. Additionally or alternatively, as discussed in more detail below in regard to process step 18, the medical images may be embodied as a number of X-ray images or other two-dimensional images from which a three-dimensional rendered model of the patient's relevant bony anatomy may be generated. Additionally, in some embodiments, the medical image may be enhanced with a contrast agent designed to highlight the cartilage surface of the patient's knee joint.

In process step 14, the orthopaedic surgeon may determine any additional pre-operative constraint data. The constraint data may be based on the orthopaedic surgeon's preferences, preferences of the patient, anatomical aspects of the patient, guidelines established by the healthcare facility, or the like. For example, the constraint data may include the orthopaedic surgeon's preference for a metal-on-metal interface, amount of inclination for implantation, the thickness of the bone to resect, size range of the orthopaedic implant, and/or the like. In some embodiments, the orthopaedic surgeon's preferences are saved as a surgeon's profile, which may used as a default constraint values for further surgical plans.

In process step 16, the medical images and the constraint data, if any, are transmitted or otherwise provided to an orthopaedic surgical instrument vendor or manufacturer. The medical images and the constraint data may be transmitted to the vendor via electronic means such as a network or the like. After the vendor has received the medical images and the constraint data, the vendor processes the images in step 18. The orthopaedic surgical instrument vendor or manufacturer process the medical images to facilitate the determination of the bone cutting planes, implant sizing, and fabrication of the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument as discussed in more detail below. For example, in process step 20 the vendor may convert or otherwise generate three-dimensional images from the medical images. For example, in embodiments wherein the medical images are embodied as a number of two-dimensional images, the vendor may use a suitable computer algorithm to generate one or more three-dimensional images form the number of two-dimensional images. Additionally, in some embodiments, the medical images may be generated based on an established standard such as the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard. In such embodiments, an edge-detection, thresholding, watershead, or shape-matching algorithm may be used to convert or reconstruct images to a format acceptable in a computer aided design application or other image processing application. Further, in some embodiments, an algorithm may be used to account for tissue such as cartilage not discernible in the generated medical images. In such embodiments, any three-dimensional model of the patient-specific instrument (see, e.g., process step 26 below) may be modified according to such algorithm to increase the fit and function of the instrument.

In process step 22, the vendor may process the medical images, and/or the converted/reconstructed images from process step 20, to determine a number of aspects related to the bony anatomy of the patient such as the anatomical axis of the patient's bones, the mechanical axis of the patient's bone, other axes and various landmarks, and/or other aspects of the patient's bony anatomy. To do so, the vendor may use any suitable algorithm to process the images.

In process step 24, the cutting planes of the patient's bone are determined. The planned cutting planes are determined based on the type, size, and position of the orthopaedic prosthesis to be used during the orthopaedic surgical procedure, on the process images such as specific landmarks identified in the images, and on the constraint data supplied by the orthopaedic surgeon in process steps 14 and 16. The type and/or size of the orthopaedic prosthesis may be determined based on the patient's anatomy and the constraint data. For example, the constraint data may dictate the type, make, model, size, or other characteristic of the orthopaedic prosthesis. The selection of the orthopaedic prosthesis may also be modified based on the medical images such that an orthopaedic prosthesis that is usable with the bony anatomy of the patient and that matches the constraint data or preferences of the orthopaedic surgeon is selected.

In addition to the type and size of the orthopaedic prosthesis, the planned location and position of the orthopaedic prosthesis relative to the patient's bony anatomy is determined. To do so, a digital template of the selected orthopaedic prosthesis may be overlaid onto one or more of the processed medical images. The vendor may use any suitable algorithm to determine a recommended location and orientation of the orthopaedic prosthesis (i.e., the digital template) with respect to the patient's bone based on the processed medical images (e.g., landmarks of the patient's bone defined in the images) and/or the constraint data. Additionally, any one or more other aspects of the patient's bony anatomy may be used to determine the proper positioning of the digital template.

In some embodiments, the digital template along with surgical alignment parameters may be presented to the orthopaedic surgeon for approval. The approval document may include the implant's rotation with respect to bony landmarks such as the femoral epicondyle, posterior condyles, sulcus groove (Whiteside's line), and the mechanical axis as defined by the hip, knee, and/or ankle centers.

The planned cutting planes for the patient's bone(s) may then be determined based on the determined size, location, and orientation of the orthopaedic prosthesis. In addition, other aspects of the patient's bony anatomy, as determined in process step 22, may be used to determine or adjust the planned cutting planes. For example, the determined mechanical axis, landmarks, and/or other determined aspects of the relevant bones of the patient may be used to determine the planned cutting planes.

In process step 26, a model of the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument is generated. In some embodiments, the model is embodied as a three-dimensional rendering of the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument. In other embodiments, the model may be embodied as a mock-up or fast prototype of the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument. The particular type of orthopaedic surgical instrument to be modeled and fabricated may be determined based on the orthopaedic surgical procedure to be performed, the constraint data, and/or the type of orthopaedic prosthesis to be implanted in the patient. As such, the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument may be embodied as any type of orthopaedic surgical instrument for use in the performance of an orthopaedic surgical procedure. For example, the orthopaedic surgical instrument may be embodied as a bone-cutting block, a drilling guide, a milling guide, and/or any other type of orthopaedic surgical tool or instrument.

The particular shape of the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument is determined based on the planned location of the orthopaedic surgical instrument relative to the patient's bony anatomy. The location of the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument with respect to the patient's bony anatomy is determined based on the type and determined location of the orthopaedic prosthesis to be used during the orthopaedic surgical procedure. That is, the planned location of the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument relative to the patient's bony anatomy may be selected based on, in part, the planned cutting planes of the patient's bone(s) as determined in step 24. For example, in embodiments wherein the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument is embodied as a bone-cutting block, the location of the orthopaedic surgical instrument is selected such that the cutting guide of the bone-cutting block matches one or more of the planned cutting planes determined in process step 24. Additionally, the planned location of the orthopaedic surgical instrument may be based on the identified landmarks of the patient's bone identified in process step 22.

In some embodiments, the particular shape or configuration of the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument may be determined based on the planned location of the instrument relative to the patient's bony anatomy. That is, the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument may include a bone-contacting surface having a negative contour that matches the contour of a portion of the bony anatomy of the patient such that the orthopaedic surgical instrument may be coupled to the bony anatomy of the patient in a unique location, which corresponds to the pre-planned location for the instrument. When the orthopaedic surgical instrument is coupled to the patient's bony anatomy in the unique location, one or more guides (e.g., cutting or drilling guide) of the orthopaedic surgical instrument may be aligned to one or more of the bone cutting plane(s) as discussed above.

One illustrative embodiment of a method 40 for generating a model, such as a computer model, of a patient-specific orthopaedic instrument is illustrated in FIGS. 2 through 9. The method 40 begins with a step 42 in which a cartilage thickness value is determined. The cartilage thickness value is indicative of the average thickness of the cartilage of the patient's bone. As such, in one embodiment, the cartilage thickness value is equal to the average thickness of cartilage for an individual having similar characteristics as the patient. For example, the cartilage thickness value may be equal to the average thickness value of individuals of the same gender as the patient, the same age as the patient, having the same activity level of the patient, and/or the like. In other embodiments, the cartilage thickness value is determined based on one or more medical images of the patient's bone, such as those images transmitted in process step 16.

In step 44, a reference contour of the patient's relevant bone is determined. The reference contour is based on the surface contour of a three-dimensional model of the patient's relevant bone, such as the three-dimensional model generated in step 20. Initially the reference contour is identical to a region (i.e. the region of interest such as the distal end of the patient's femur or the proximal end of the patient's tibia) of the patient's bone. That is, in some embodiments, the reference contour is juxtaposed on the surface contour of the region of the patient's bone.

Subsequently, in step 46, the reference contour is scaled to compensate for the cartilage thickness value determined in step 42. To do so, in one embodiment, the scale of the reference contour is increased based on the cartilage thickness value. For example, the scale of the reference contour may be increased by an amount equal to or determined from the cartilage thickness value. However, in other embodiments, the reference contour may be scaled using other techniques designed to scale the reference contour to a size at which the reference contour is compensated for the thickness of the cartilage on the patient's bone.

For example, in one particular embodiment, the reference contour is scaled by increasing the distance between a fixed reference point and a point lying on, and defining in part, the reference contour. To do so, in one embodiment, a method 60 for scaling a reference contour as illustrated in FIG. 3 may be used. The method 60 begins with step 62 in which a medial/lateral line segment is established on the three-dimensional model of the patient's relevant bone. The medial/lateral line segment is defined or otherwise selected so as to extend from a point lying on the medial surface of the patient's bone to a point lying on lateral surface of the patient's bone. The medial surface point and the lateral surface point may be selected so as to define the substantially maximum local medial/lateral width of the patient's bone in some embodiments.

In step 64, an anterior/posterior line segment is established on the three-dimensional model of the patient's relevant bone. The anterior/posterior line segment is defined or otherwise selected so as to extend from a point lying on the anterior surface of the patient's bone to a point lying on posterior surface of the patient's bone. The anterior surface point and the posterior surface point may be selected so as to define the substantially maximum local anterior/posterior width of the patient's bone in some embodiments.

The reference point from which the reference contour will be scaled is defined in step 66 as the intersection point of the medial/lateral line segment and anterior/posterior line segment. As such, it should be appreciated that the medial surface point, the lateral surface point, the anterior surface point, and the posterior surface point lie on the same plane. After the reference point is initially established in step 66, the reference point is moved or otherwise translated toward an end of the patient's bone. For example, in embodiments wherein the patient's bone is embodied as a femur, the reference point is moved inferiorly toward the distal end of the patient's femur. Conversely, in embodiments when the patient's bone is embodied as a tibia, the reference point is moved superiorly toward the proximal end of the patient's tibia. In one embodiment, the reference point is moved a distance equal to about half the length of the anterior/posterior line segment as determined in step 64. However, in other embodiments, the reference point may be moved other distances sufficient to compensate the reference contour for thickness of the cartilage present on the patient's bone.

Once the location of the reference point has been determined in step 68, the distance between the reference point and each point lying on, and defining in part, the reference contour is increased in step 70. To do so, in one particular embodiment, each point of the reference contour is moved a distance away from the reference point based on a percentage value of the original distance defined between the reference point and the particular point on the reference contour. For example, in one embodiment, each point lying on, and defining in part, the reference contour is moved away from the reference point in by a distance equal to a percentage value of the original distance between the reference point and the particular point. In one embodiment, the percentage value is in the range of about 5 percent to about thirty percent. In one particular embodiment, the percentage value is about ten percent.

Referring now to FIGS. 4-9, in another embodiment, the reference contour is scaled by manually selecting a local “high” point on the surface contour of the three-dimensional image of the patient's bone. For example, in embodiments wherein the relevant patient's bone is embodied as a tibia as illustrated in FIGS. 4-6, the reference point 90 is initially located on the tibial plateau high point of the tibial model 92. Either side of the tibial plateau may be used. Once the reference point 90 is initially established on the tibial plateau high point, the reference point 90 is translated to the approximate center of the plateau as illustrated in FIG. 5 such that the Z-axis defining the reference point is parallel to the mechanical axis of the tibial model 92. Subsequently, as illustrated in FIG. 6, the reference point is moved in the distal direction by a predetermined amount. In one particular embodiment, the reference point is moved is the distal direction by about 20 millimeters, but other distances may be used in other embodiments. For example, the distance over which the reference point is moved may be based on the cartilage thickness value in some embodiments.

Conversely, in embodiments wherein the relevant patient's bone is embodied as a femur as illustrated in FIGS. 7-9, the reference point 90 is initially located on the most distal point of the distal end of the femoral model 94. Either condyle of the femoral model 94 may be used in various embodiments. Once the reference point 90 is initially established on the most distal point, the reference point 90 is translated to the approximate center of the distal end of the femoral model 94 as illustrated in FIG. 8 such that the Z-axis defining the reference point 90 is parallel to the mechanical axis of the femoral model 92. The anterior-posterior width 96 of the distal end of the femoral model 94 is also determined. Subsequently, as illustrated in FIG. 9, the reference point is moved or otherwise translated in the proximal or superior direction by a distance 98. In one particular embodiment, the reference point is moved in the distal or superior direction by a distance 98 equal to about half the distance 96. As such, it should be appreciated that one of a number of different techniques may be used to define the location of the reference point based on, for example, the type of bone.

Referring now back to FIG. 2, once the reference contour has been scaled in step 46, the medial/lateral sides of the reference contour are adjusted in step 48. To do so, in one embodiment, the distance between the reference point and each point lying on, and defining in part, the medial side and lateral side of the reference contour is decreased. For example, in some embodiments, the distance between the reference point and the points on the medial and lateral sides of the scaled reference contour are decreased to the original distance between such points. As such, it should be appreciated that the reference contour is offset or otherwise enlarged with respect to the anterior side of the patient's bone and substantially matches or is otherwise not scaled with respect to the medial and lateral sides of the patient's bone.

The reference contour may also be adjusted in step 48 for areas of the patient's bone having a reduced thickness of cartilage. Such areas of reduced cartilage thickness may be determined based on the existence of bone-on-bone contact as identified in a medical image, simulation, or the like. Additionally, information indicative of such areas may be provided by the orthopaedic surgeon based on his/her expertise. If one or more areas of reduced cartilage thickness are identified, the reference contour corresponding to such areas of the patient's bone is reduced (i.e., scaled back or down).

Additionally, in some embodiments, one or more osteophytes on the patient's bone may be identified; and the reference contour may be compensated for such presence of the osteophytes. By compensating for such osteophytes, the reference contour more closely matches the surface contour of the patient's bone. Further, in some embodiments, a distal end (in embodiments wherein the patient's bone is embodied as a tibia) or a proximal end (in embodiments wherein the patient's bone is embodied as a femur) of the reference contour may be adjusted to increase the conformity of the reference contour to the surface contour of the bone. For example, in embodiments wherein the patient's bone is a femur, the superior end of the scaled reference contour may be reduced or otherwise moved closer to the surface contour of the patient's femur in the region located superiorly to a cartilage demarcation line defined on the patient's femur. Conversely, in embodiments wherein the patient's bone is embodied as a tibia, an inferior end of the scaled reference contour may be reduced or otherwise moved closer to the surface contour of the patient's tibia in the region located inferiorly to a cartilage demarcation line of the patient's tibia. As such, it should be appreciated that the scaled reference contour is initially enlarged to compensate for the thickness of the patient's cartilage on the patient's bone. Portions of the scaled reference contour are then reduced or otherwise moved back to original positions and/or toward the reference point in those areas where cartilage is lacking, reduced, or otherwise not present.

Once the reference contour has been scaled and adjusted in steps 46 and 48, the position of the cutting guide is defined in step 50. In particular, the position of the cutting guide is defined based on an angle defined between a mechanical axis of the patient's femur and a mechanical axis of the patient's tibia. The angle may be determined by establishing a line segment or ray originating from the proximal end of the patient's femur to the distal end of the patient's femur and defining a second line segment or ray extending from the patient's ankle through the proximal end of the patient's tibia. The angle defined by these two line segments/rays is equal to the angle defined between the mechanical axis of the patient's femur and tibia. The position of the bone cutting guide is then determined based on the angle between the mechanical axes of the patient's femur and tibia. It should be appreciated that the position of the cutting guide defines the position and orientation of the cutting plane of the customized patient-specific cutting block. Subsequently, in step 52, a negative contour of the customized patient-specific cutting block is defined based on the scaled and adjusted reference contour and the angle defined between the mechanical axis of the femur and tibia.

Referring back to FIG. 1, after the model of the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument has been generated in process step 26, the model is validated in process step 28. The model may be validated by, for example, analyzing the rendered model while coupled to the three-dimensional model of the patient's anatomy to verify the correlation of cutting guides and planes, drilling guides and planned drill points, and/or the like. Additionally, the model may be validated by transmitting or otherwise providing the model generated in step 26 to the orthopaedic surgeon for review. For example, in embodiments wherein the model is a three-dimensional rendered model, the model along with the three-dimensional images of the patient's relevant bone(s) may be transmitted to the surgeon for review. In embodiments wherein the model is a physical prototype, the model may be shipped to the orthopaedic surgeon for validation.

After the model has been validated in process step 28, the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument is fabricated in process step 30. The customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument may be fabricated using any suitable fabrication device and method. Additionally, the customized patient-specific orthopaedic instrument may be formed from any suitable material such as a metallic material, a plastic material, or combination thereof depending on, for example, the intended use of the instrument. The fabricated customized patient-specific orthopaedic instrument is subsequently shipped or otherwise provided to the orthopaedic surgeon. The surgeon performs the orthopaedic surgical procedure in process step 32 using the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument. As discussed above, because the orthopaedic surgeon does not need to determine the proper location of the orthopaedic surgical instrument intra-operatively, which typically requires some amount of estimation on part of the surgeon, the guesswork and/or intra-operative decision-making on part of the orthopaedic surgeon is reduced.

Referring now to FIGS. 10-12, in one embodiment, the customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument may be embodied as a tibial cutting block 100. The cutting block 100 is configured to be coupled to a tibia of a patient. The cutting block 100 includes a body 102 configured to be coupled to the anterior side of the patient's tibia and two arms or tabs 104, 106 which extend posteriorly away from the body 102. The tabs 104, 106 are configured to wrap around a proximal end of the tibia as discussed in more detail below. The cutting block 100 may be formed from any suitable material. For example, the cutting block 100 may be formed from a plastic or resin material. In one particular embodiment, the cutting block 100 is formed from Vero resin using a rapid prototype fabrication process. However, the cutting block 100 may be formed from other materials in other embodiments. For example, in another particular embodiment, the cutting block 100 is formed from a polyimide thermoplastic resin, such as a Ultem resin, which is commercially available from Saudi Basic Industries Corporation Innovative Plastics of Riyhadh, Saudi Arabia.

The body 102 includes a bone-contacting or bone-facing surface 112 and an outer surface 114 opposite the bone-facing surface 112. The outer surface 114 includes a number of guide holes or passageways 116 defined therethrough. A guide pin bushing 118 is received in each guide hole 116. The guide pin bushings 118 include an internal passageway 120 sized to receive a respective guide pin to secure the block 100 to the patient's tibia. As shown in FIG. 12, the guide passageways 116 extends from the outer surface 114 to the bone-facing surface 112 and is counterbored on the bone-facing surface 112. That is, the passageway 116 has an opening 122 on the bone-facing surface 112 having a diameter greater than the diameter of an opening 124 on the outer surface 114

The cutting guide 100 includes a cutting guide 130 secured to the body 102. In one particular embodiment, the cutting guide 130 is overmolded to the body 102. The cutting guide 130 includes a cutting guide slot 132. The cutting guide 130 may be formed from the same material as the body 102 or from a different material. In one particular embodiment, the cutting guide 130 is formed from a metallic material such as stainless steel. The body 102 also includes a window or opening 134 to allow a surgeon to visualize the positioning of the block 100 on the patient's tibia by viewing portions of the tibia through the opening 134. In the illustrative embodiment, the window 134 is embodied as a notch 136 defined on a superior end surface 137 of the body 102 of the cutting guide 100. However, in other embodiments, the cutting block 100 may include windows or openings formed in the body 102 having other shapes and sizes.

The bone-facing surface 112 of the body 102 includes a negative contour 138 configured to receive a portion of the anterior side of the patient's tibia having a corresponding contour and a portion of the medial side of the patient's tibia. The customized patient-specific negative contour 138 of the bone-contacting surface 112 allows the positioning of the cutting block 100 on the patient's tibia in a unique pre-determined location and orientation. In the exemplary embodiment described herein, the negative contour 138 is selected such that cutting block 100 is configured to be coupled to the patient's tibia on an anterior-medial side, as opposed to solely on the anterior surface of the tibia. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 11, when the cutting block 100 is secured to a patient's tibia, an angle (α) is defined between a vertically-extending, bisecting plane 162 of the body 102 of the block 100 and a bisecting sagittal plane 164 of the patient's tibia (i.e., the A/P plane 164). The magnitude of the angle (α) may be selected based on, for example, the gender or age of the patient. In one particular embodiment, the angle (α) is in the range of about 10° to about 30°. In another particular embodiment, the angle is about 20°.

Such an offset from the A/P plane 164 facilitates use of the cutting block 100. In particular, conventional tibial cutting blocks are designed for attachment to the anterior surface of the proximal tibia. However, the patellar tendon and a significant amount of other soft tissues cover the proximal tibia in this region. Therefore, in order to secure a conventional tibial resection guide to the proximal tibia, the surgeon must create a long enough incision to retract the patellar tendon and soft tissue layers. However, the region of the proximal tibia slightly medial to the patellar tendon has relatively little soft tissue overlying the bone surface. As such, the customized patient-specific negative contour 138 of the bone-contacting surface 112 allows the positioning of the cutting block 100 to be secured to this medial-anterior region of the proximal tibia in order to minimize trauma to the patellar tendon and soft tissues. Moreover, the medial-anterior region of the proximal tibia includes a number of anatomical features that make for “high confidence” placement of the cutting block 100.

As shown in FIG. 13, in such a configuration, the cutting slot 132 is likewise oriented in the offset position to guide a bone saw directed in the anterior-posterior plane. In other words, when viewed superiorly as in FIG. 13, the longitudinal axis 172 of the cutting slot 132 is perpendicular to the bisecting plane 162 of the cutting block's body 102.

The tabs 104, 106 include a bone-contacting or bone-facing surface 140, 142, respectively, and an outer surface 144, 146, respectively, opposite the bone-facing surface 140, 142. The bone-facing surface 140 of the tab 104 includes a negative contour 148 configured to receive a portion of the proximal side of the patient's tibia having a respective corresponding contour. Similarly, the bone-facing surface 142 of the tab 106 includes a negative contour 150 configured to receive a portion of the proximal side of the patient's tibia having a respective corresponding contour.

As discussed above, the arms or tabs 104, 106 extend posteriorly from the body 102 to define a U-shaped opening 105 therebetween. The tabs 104, 106 may extend from the body 102 the same distance or a different distance. For example, as shown in FIG. 11, the tab 104 extends from the body 102 a distance 152 and the tab 106 extends from the body 102 by a distance 154, which is greater than the distance 152.

In some embodiments, the negative contours 138, 148, 150 of the bone-contacting surfaces 112, 140, 142 of the cutting block 1400 may or may not match the corresponding contour surface of the patient's bone. That is, as discussed above, the negative contours 138, 148, 150 may be scaled or otherwise resized (e.g., enlarged) to compensate for the patient's cartilage or lack thereof.

In use, the tibial cutting block 100 is coupled to the proximal end of the patient's tibia. Again, because the bone-contacting surfaces 112, 140, 142 of the cutting block 100 include the negative contours 138, 148, 150 the block 100 may be coupled to the patient's tibia in a pre-planned, unique position. When so coupled, the tabs 104, 106 wrap around the proximal end of the patient's tibia and the lips 108, 110 of the tabs 104, 106 wrap around the posterior side of the patient's tibia. Additionally, when the block 100 is coupled to the patient's tibia, a portion of the anterior side of the tibia is received in the negative contour 138 of the body 102 and a portion of the proximal side of the patient's tibia is received in the negative contours 148, 150 of the tabs 104, 106.

Referring now to FIG. 14, there is shown another embodiment of the tibial cutting block 100. The tibial cutting block 100 of FIG. 14 is substantially the same as the tibial cutting block 100 of FIGS. 10-13 except for the orientation of the cutting slot 132. In particular, like the cutting block 100 of FIGS. 10-13, the customized patient-specific negative contour 138 of the bone-contacting surface 112 of the cutting block 100 if FIG. 14 is configured to be coupled to the patient's tibia on an anterior-medial side, as opposed to solely on the anterior surface of the tibia. In particular, as shown in FIG. 14, like the cutting block 100 of FIGS. 10-13, when the cutting block 100 of FIG. 14 is secured to a patient's tibia, an angle (α) is defined between the vertically-extending, bisecting plane 162 of the body 102 of the block 100 and the bisecting sagittal plane 164 of the patient's tibia (i.e., the A/P plane 164). The magnitude of the angle (α) may be selected based on, for example, the gender or age of the patient. In one particular embodiment, the angle (α) is in the range of about 10° to about 30°. In another particular embodiment, the angle is about 20°.

However, unlike the cutting block 100 of FIGS. 10-13, the cutting slot 132 of the cutting block 100 of FIG. 14 is oriented in the position to guide a bone saw directed in the anterior-posterior plane. In other words, when viewed superiorly as in FIG. 14, the longitudinal axis 172 of the cutting slot 132 is perpendicular to the bisecting sagittal plane 164 of the patient's tibia (i.e., the A/P plane 164). Such a configuration allows the cutting block 100 to be secured to the “high confidence” anatomical features associated with the medial-anterior region of the proximal tibia, while also allowing for advancement of the bone saw blade along the A/P plane 164.

While the disclosure has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, such an illustration and description is to be considered as exemplary and not restrictive in character, it being understood that only illustrative embodiments have been shown and described and that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the disclosure are desired to be protected.

There are a plurality of advantages of the present disclosure arising from the various features of the apparatus, system, and method described herein. It will be noted that alternative embodiments of the apparatus, system, and method of the present disclosure may not include all of the features described yet still benefit from at least some of the advantages of such features. Those of ordinary skill in the art may readily devise their own implementations of the apparatus, system, and method that incorporate one or more of the features of the present invention and fall within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure as defined by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A customized patient-specific tibial cutting block, comprising: a body having a bone-facing surface that has a customized patient-specific negative contour configured to receive (i) a portion of an anterior side of a patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour, and (ii) a portion of a medial side of the patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour such that, when viewed superiorly, an angle greater than zero is defined between a vertically-extending, bisecting plane of the body and a bisecting sagittal plane of the patient's tibia when the portions of the patient's tibia are received in the customized patient-specific negative contour of the body, andat least one tab extending posteriorly from the body, the at least one tab having a bone-facing surface having a customized patient-specific negative contour configured to receive a portion of the proximal side of the patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour.
2. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block of claim 1, wherein: the at least one tab comprises a first tab extending posteriorly from the body and a second tab extending posteriorly from the body,each of the first tab and the second tab has a bone-facing surface having a customized patient-specific negative contour configured to receive a respective portion of the proximal end of the patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour, andthe first tab and the second tab define an opening therebetween.
3. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block of claim 1, wherein the body has a cutting slot defined therein, the cutting slot being positioned to allow a surgeon to perform a proximal cut on the patient's tibia using the cutting slot.
4. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block of claim 1, further comprising a cutting guide coupled to the body, wherein: the cutting guide has a cutting slot defined therein, andthe cutting guide is formed from a material different from the body and being positioned to allow a surgeon to perform a proximal cut on the patient's tibia using the cutting slot.
5. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block of claim 4, wherein the cutting guide is formed from a metallic material and is overmolded to the body of the customized patient-specific femoral cutting block.
6. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block of claim 1, further comprising a cutting guide coupled to the body, wherein: the cutting guide has a cutting slot defined therein, the cutting slot having a longitudinal axis, andthe longitudinal axis of the cutting slot defines a substantially perpendicular angle with the vertically-extending, bisecting plane of the body.
7. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block of claim 1, further comprising a cutting guide coupled to the body, wherein: the cutting guide has a cutting slot defined therein, the cutting slot having a longitudinal axis, andthe longitudinal axis of the cutting slot defines a substantially perpendicular angle with the bisecting sagittal plane of the patient's tibia when the portions of the patient's tibia are received in the customized patient-specific negative contour of the body.
8. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block of claim 1, wherein the angle defined between the vertically-extending, bisecting plane of the body and the bisecting sagittal plane of the patient's tibia is between ten degrees and thirty degrees.
9. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block of claim 8, wherein the angle defined between the vertically-extending, bisecting plane of the body and the bisecting sagittal plane of the patient's tibia is about twenty degrees.
10. A customized patient-specific tibial cutting block, comprising: a body having a bone-facing surface that has a customized patient-specific negative contour configured to receive (i) a portion of an anterior side of a patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour, and (ii) a portion of a medial side of the patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour such that, when viewed superiorly, an angle greater than zero is defined between a vertically-extending, bisecting plane of the body and a bisecting sagittal plane of the patient's tibia when the portions of the patient's tibia are received in the customized patient-specific negative contour of the body,a cutting guide coupled to the body, the cutting guide having a cutting slot that has a longitudinal axis that defines a substantially perpendicular angle with the vertically-extending, bisecting plane of the body, andat least one tab extending posteriorly from the body, the at least one tab having a bone-facing surface having a customized patient-specific negative contour configured to receive a portion of the proximal side of the patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour.
11. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block of claim 10, wherein: the at least one tab comprises a first tab extending posteriorly from the body and a second tab extending posteriorly from the body,each of the first tab and the second tab has a bone-facing surface having a customized patient-specific negative contour configured to receive a respective portion of the proximal end of the patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour, andthe first tab and the second tab define an opening therebetween.
12. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block of claim 10, wherein the cutting guide is formed from a metallic material and is overmolded to the body of the customized patient-specific femoral cutting block.
13. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block of claim 10, wherein the angle defined between the vertically-extending, bisecting plane of the body and the bisecting sagittal plane of the patient's tibia is between ten degrees and thirty degrees.
14. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block of claim 13, wherein the angle defined between the vertically-extending, bisecting plane of the body and the bisecting sagittal plane of the patient's tibia is about twenty degrees.
15. A customized patient-specific tibial cutting block, comprising: a body having a bone-facing surface that has a customized patient-specific negative contour configured to receive (i) a portion of an anterior side of a patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour, and (ii) a portion of a medial side of the patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour such that, when viewed superiorly, an angle greater than zero is defined between a vertically-extending, bisecting plane of the body and a bisecting sagittal plane of the patient's tibia when the portions of the patient's tibia are received in the customized patient-specific negative contour of the body,a cutting guide coupled to the body, the cutting guide having a cutting slot that has a longitudinal axis that defines a substantially perpendicular angle with the bisecting sagittal plane of the patient's tibia when the portions of the patient's tibia are received in the customized patient-specific negative contour of the body, andat least one tab extending posteriorly from the body, the at least one tab having a bone-facing surface having a customized patient-specific negative contour configured to receive a portion of the proximal side of the patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour.
16. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block of claim 15, wherein: the at least one tab comprises a first tab extending posteriorly from the body and a second tab extending posteriorly from the body,each of the first tab and the second tab has a bone-facing surface having a customized patient-specific negative contour configured to receive a respective portion of the proximal end of the patient's tibia that has a corresponding positive contour, andthe first tab and the second tab define an opening therebetween.
17. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block of claim 15, wherein the cutting guide is formed from a metallic material and is overmolded to the body of the customized patient-specific femoral cutting block.
18. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block of claim 15, wherein the angle defined between the vertically-extending, bisecting plane of the body and the bisecting sagittal plane of the patient's tibia is between ten degrees and thirty degrees.
19. The customized patient-specific tibial cutting block of claim 18, wherein the angle defined between the vertically-extending, bisecting plane of the body and the bisecting sagittal plane of the patient's tibia is about twenty degrees.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED U.S. PATENT APPLICATIONS

This application is a national stage entry under 35 USC §371(b) of International Application No. PCT/US2011/025887, filed Feb. 23, 2011, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/308,136, entitled “Customized Patient-Specific Tibial Cutting Blocks,” which was filed on Feb. 25, 2010 by Luke Aram et al., and is a continuation-in-part application of co-pending U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/240,990, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,425,523, entitled “Customized Patient-Specific Instrumentation for Use In Orthopaedic Surgical Procedures,” which was filed by Luke Aram et al. on Sep. 29, 2008 which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/976,447 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Fabricating Customized Patent Instrumentation,” which was filed on Sep. 30, 2007 by Dan Auger et al.; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/976,448 entitled “Adjustable Customized Patient-Specific Orthopaedic Surgical Instrumentation,” which was filed on Sep. 30, 2007 by Luke Aram et al.; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/976,451 entitled “Customized Patient-Specific Instrumentation For Use In Orthopaedic Surgical Procedures,” which was filed on Sep. 30, 2007 by Jeff Roose et al.; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/976,444 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Patient-Specific Positioning of Orthopaedic Surgical Instrumentation,” which was filed on Sep. 30, 2007 by Luke Aram et al.; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/976,446 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Aligning Customized Patient-Specific Orthopaedic Surgical Instruments,” which was filed on Sep. 30, 2007 by Luke Aram et al., each of these applications is assigned to the same assignee as the present application, and each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Cross-reference is made to co-pending U.S. Utility patent application Ser. Nos. 12/240,985; 12/240,990; 12/240,988; 12/240,992; 12/240,994; 12/240,996; 12/240,997; 12/240,998; 12/241,006; 12/241,002; 12/241,001; and 12/240,999. Each of these applications was filed on Sep. 29, 2008, and is assigned to the same assignee as the present application. Each of these applications is hereby incorporated by reference.

PCT Information

Filing Document	Filing Date	Country	Kind	371c Date
PCT/US2011/025887	2/23/2011	WO	00	11/2/2012

Publishing Document	Publishing Date	Country	Kind
WO2011/106395	9/1/2011	WO	A

US Referenced Citations (220)

Number	Name	Date	Kind
3298410	Noboru	Jan 1967	A
3816855	Saleh	Jun 1974	A
3901298	Eby	Aug 1975	A
3965950	MacDonald	Jun 1976	A
4055862	Farling	Nov 1977	A
4140161	Russo et al.	Feb 1979	A
4197886	MacDonald	Apr 1980	A
4436684	White	Mar 1984	A
4719907	Banko et al.	Jan 1988	A
4721104	Kaufman et al.	Jan 1988	A
4759350	Dunn et al.	Jul 1988	A
4787383	Kenna	Nov 1988	A
4834080	Brown	May 1989	A
4841975	Woolson	Jun 1989	A
4860735	Davey et al.	Aug 1989	A
5053037	Lackey	Oct 1991	A
5067964	Richmond et al.	Nov 1991	A
5122144	Bert et al.	Jun 1992	A
5129908	Petersen	Jul 1992	A
5186174	Schlondorff et al.	Feb 1993	A
5258032	Bertin	Nov 1993	A
5314478	Oka et al.	May 1994	A
5314482	Goodfellow et al.	May 1994	A
5360446	Kennedy	Nov 1994	A
5370692	Fink et al.	Dec 1994	A
5417694	Marik et al.	May 1995	A
5423828	Benson	Jun 1995	A
5445642	McNulty et al.	Aug 1995	A
5448489	Reuben	Sep 1995	A
5458645	Bertin	Oct 1995	A
5462549	Glock	Oct 1995	A
5474559	Bertin et al.	Dec 1995	A
5510066	Fink et al.	Apr 1996	A
5514139	Goldstein et al.	May 1996	A
5518680	Cima et al.	May 1996	A
5520695	Luckman	May 1996	A
5542947	Treacy	Aug 1996	A
5562674	Stalcup et al.	Oct 1996	A
5601563	Burke et al.	Feb 1997	A
5632745	Schwartz	May 1997	A
5683397	Vendrely et al.	Nov 1997	A
5683466	Vitale	Nov 1997	A
5702460	Carls et al.	Dec 1997	A
5722978	Jenkins, Jr.	Mar 1998	A
5725376	Poirier	Mar 1998	A
5733292	Gustilo et al.	Mar 1998	A
5776201	Colleran et al.	Jul 1998	A
5791212	Han	Aug 1998	A
5869170	Cima et al.	Feb 1999	A
5879393	Whiteside et al.	Mar 1999	A
5885296	Masini	Mar 1999	A
5897559	Masini	Apr 1999	A
5925049	Gustilo et al.	Jul 1999	A
5942370	Neckers et al.	Aug 1999	A
5980526	Johnson et al.	Nov 1999	A
5989261	Walker et al.	Nov 1999	A
6007537	Burkinshaw et al.	Dec 1999	A
6024746	Katz	Feb 2000	A
6080196	Bertin	Jun 2000	A
6081577	Webber	Jun 2000	A
6096043	Techiera et al.	Aug 2000	A
6099313	Dorken et al.	Aug 2000	A
6139574	Vacanti et al.	Oct 2000	A
6161080	Aouni et al.	Dec 2000	A
6176874	Vacanti et al.	Jan 2001	B1
6177034	Ferrone	Jan 2001	B1
6206927	Fell et al.	Mar 2001	B1
6220122	Forsell et al.	Apr 2001	B1
6241735	Marmulla	Jun 2001	B1
6244141	Han	Jun 2001	B1
6251143	Schwartz et al.	Jun 2001	B1
6319006	Scherer et al.	Nov 2001	B1
6322728	Brodkin et al.	Nov 2001	B1
6382975	Poirier	May 2002	B1
6454811	Sherwood et al.	Sep 2002	B1
6463351	Clynch	Oct 2002	B1
6478799	Williamson	Nov 2002	B1
6510334	Schuster et al.	Jan 2003	B1
6530958	Cima et al.	Mar 2003	B1
6554837	Hauri et al.	Apr 2003	B1
6554838	McGovern et al.	Apr 2003	B2
6558391	Axelson et al.	May 2003	B2
6575980	Robie et al.	Jun 2003	B1
6626945	Simon et al.	Sep 2003	B2
6668941	Phillips et al.	Dec 2003	B2
6679917	Ek	Jan 2004	B2
6711432	Weiss et al.	Mar 2004	B1
6712824	Millard et al.	Mar 2004	B2
6712856	Carignan et al.	Mar 2004	B1
6738657	Franklin et al.	May 2004	B1
6766878	Widmer et al.	Jul 2004	B2
6772026	Bradbury et al.	Aug 2004	B2
6814735	Zirngibl et al.	Nov 2004	B1
6916324	Sanford et al.	Jul 2005	B2
6994549	Brodkin et al.	Feb 2006	B2
7060074	Rosa et al.	Jun 2006	B2
7141053	Rosa et al.	Nov 2006	B2
7172597	Sanford	Feb 2007	B2
7175435	Andersson et al.	Feb 2007	B2
7194295	Vilsmeier	Mar 2007	B2
7534263	Burdulis, Jr. et al.	May 2009	B2
7618451	Berez et al.	Nov 2009	B2
7634119	Tsougarakis et al.	Dec 2009	B2
7717956	Lang	May 2010	B2
7796791	Tsougarakis et al.	Sep 2010	B2
7824181	Sers	Nov 2010	B2
7981158	Fitz et al.	Jul 2011	B2
7988691	Schulze et al.	Aug 2011	B2
20020029045	Bonutti	Mar 2002	A1
20020059049	Bradbury et al.	May 2002	A1
20020183760	McGovern et al.	Dec 2002	A1
20030055501	Fell et al.	Mar 2003	A1
20030216669	Lang et al.	Nov 2003	A1
20030225413	Sanford et al.	Dec 2003	A1
20040039259	Krause et al.	Feb 2004	A1
20040092932	Aubin et al.	May 2004	A1
20040153087	Sanford et al.	Aug 2004	A1
20040181144	Cinquin et al.	Sep 2004	A1
20040185422	Orth et al.	Sep 2004	A1
20040204760	Fitz et al.	Oct 2004	A1
20040236424	Berez et al.	Nov 2004	A1
20040249385	Faoro	Dec 2004	A1
20040260301	Lionberger et al.	Dec 2004	A1
20050015003	Lachner et al.	Jan 2005	A1
20050037320	Poirier	Feb 2005	A1
20050043835	Christensen	Feb 2005	A1
20050075641	Singhatat et al.	Apr 2005	A1
20050133955	Christensen	Jun 2005	A1
20050170311	Tardieu et al.	Aug 2005	A1
20050171545	Walsh et al.	Aug 2005	A1
20050234461	Burdulis et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20050261697	Canonaco et al.	Nov 2005	A1
20050267485	Cordes et al.	Dec 2005	A1
20050267584	Burdulis et al.	Dec 2005	A1
20060089621	Fard	Apr 2006	A1
20060245627	Nagamune	Nov 2006	A1
20070006887	Frank	Jan 2007	A1
20070059665	Orentlicher et al.	Mar 2007	A1
20070173858	Engh et al.	Jul 2007	A1
20070198022	Lang et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070213738	Martin et al.	Sep 2007	A1
20070226986	Park et al.	Oct 2007	A1
20070233140	Metzger et al.	Oct 2007	A1
20070233141	Park et al.	Oct 2007	A1
20070250169	Lang	Oct 2007	A1
20070288030	Metzger et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20080015602	Axelson	Jan 2008	A1
20080015607	D'Alessio et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080147072	Park et al.	Jun 2008	A1
20080183177	Fox et al.	Jul 2008	A1
20080195107	Cuckler et al.	Aug 2008	A1
20080228189	Fox et al.	Sep 2008	A1
20080234685	Gjerde	Sep 2008	A1
20080243127	Lang et al.	Oct 2008	A1
20080257363	Schoenefeld et al.	Oct 2008	A1
20080262624	White et al.	Oct 2008	A1
20080275452	Lang et al.	Nov 2008	A1
20080281328	Lang et al.	Nov 2008	A1
20080281329	Fitz et al.	Nov 2008	A1
20080281426	Fitz et al.	Nov 2008	A1
20080287954	Kunz et al.	Nov 2008	A1
20080306558	Hakki	Dec 2008	A1
20080312659	Metzger et al.	Dec 2008	A1
20090018546	Daley	Jan 2009	A1
20090024131	Metzger et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090087276	Rose	Apr 2009	A1
20090088674	Caillouette et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090088753	Aram et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090088754	Aker et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090088755	Aker et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090088758	Bennett	Apr 2009	A1
20090088759	Aram et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090088760	Aram et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090088761	Roose et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090088763	Aram et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090093816	Roose et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090099567	Zajac	Apr 2009	A1
20090131941	Park et al.	May 2009	A1
20090131942	Aker et al.	May 2009	A1
20090138020	Park et al.	May 2009	A1
20090149977	Schendel	Jun 2009	A1
20090151736	Belcher et al.	Jun 2009	A1
20090157083	Park et al.	Jun 2009	A1
20090163922	Meridew et al.	Jun 2009	A1
20090164024	Rudan et al.	Jun 2009	A1
20090222014	Bojarski et al.	Sep 2009	A1
20090222016	Park et al.	Sep 2009	A1
20090254093	White et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090254367	Belcher et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090270868	Park et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090274350	Pavlovskaia et al.	Nov 2009	A1
20090307893	Burdulis, Jr. et al.	Dec 2009	A1
20100016947	Dobak et al.	Jan 2010	A1
20100023015	Park	Jan 2010	A1
20100087829	Metzger et al.	Apr 2010	A1
20100152782	Stone et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100160917	Fitz et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100168754	Fitz et al.	Jul 2010	A1
20100185202	Lester et al.	Jul 2010	A1
20100191244	White et al.	Jul 2010	A1
20100212138	Carroll et al.	Aug 2010	A1
20100217270	Polinski et al.	Aug 2010	A1
20100217338	Carroll et al.	Aug 2010	A1
20100228257	Bonutti	Sep 2010	A1
20100262150	Lian	Oct 2010	A1
20100274253	Ure	Oct 2010	A1
20100281678	Burdulis, Jr. et al.	Nov 2010	A1
20100286700	Snider et al.	Nov 2010	A1
20100303324	Lang et al.	Dec 2010	A1
20100305573	Fitz et al.	Dec 2010	A1
20110015636	Katrana et al.	Jan 2011	A1
20110015639	Metzger et al.	Jan 2011	A1
20110029091	Bojarski et al.	Feb 2011	A1
20110029116	Jordan et al.	Feb 2011	A1
20110054478	Vanasse et al.	Mar 2011	A1
20110066193	Lang et al.	Mar 2011	A1
20110071533	Metzger et al.	Mar 2011	A1
20110092804	Schoenefeld et al.	Apr 2011	A1
20110093086	Witt et al.	Apr 2011	A1
20120029520	Lang et al.	Feb 2012	A1

Foreign Referenced Citations (50)

Number	Date	Country
3339259	Mar 1985	DE
3925488	Feb 1990	DE
3902249	Aug 1990	DE
4016704	Sep 1991	DE
3717871	May 1995	DE
97001	Dec 1983	EP
337901	Oct 1989	EP
0908836	Apr 1999	EP
1013231	Jun 2000	EP
1136041	Sep 2001	EP
904158	Jul 2002	EP
709061	Jul 2003	EP
1348393	Oct 2003	EP
1486900	Dec 2004	EP
1498851	Jan 2005	EP
1444957	Mar 2007	EP
1938749	Jul 2008	EP
1669033	Feb 2009	EP
2819168	Jul 2002	FR
2437003	Oct 2007	GB
8911257	Nov 1989	WO
9325157	Dec 1993	WO
9730641	Aug 1997	WO
9800072	Jan 1998	WO
9832384	Jul 1998	WO
9932045	Jul 1999	WO
04000139	Dec 2003	WO
2004032806	Apr 2004	WO
2004017842	Jun 2004	WO
2004049981	Jun 2004	WO
2004075771	Sep 2004	WO
2005018453	Mar 2005	WO
2005051239	Jun 2005	WO
2005051240	Jun 2005	WO
2005053564	Jun 2005	WO
2006058057	Jun 2006	WO
2006060795	Jun 2006	WO
2007092841	Aug 2007	WO
2007097853	Aug 2007	WO
2007097854	Aug 2007	WO
2007145937	Dec 2007	WO
2008021494	Feb 2008	WO
2008112996	Sep 2008	WO
2008117028	Oct 2008	WO
2009001083	Dec 2008	WO
2009045960	Apr 2009	WO
2009111512	Sep 2009	WO
2009129063	Oct 2009	WO
2009129067	Oct 2009	WO
2010033431	Mar 2010	WO

Non-Patent Literature Citations (18)

Entry
PCT International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/025907, Apr. 12, 2011.
European Search Report; European Patent Application No. 08165418.8-2165; dated Jan. 23, 2009; 6 pages.
Hube et al.; Orthopaedic Surgery The Essentials, Chaper 36 Knee Reconstruction; 1999; 12 pages.
Corin Medical Limited; The Corin X-ActTM Instrumentation and Operative Technique; Nov. 1998; 9 pages.
Kraus et al.; A Comparative Assessment of Alignment Angle of the Knee by Radiographic and Physical Examination Methods; Jun. 6, 2005; 6 pages.
Depuy; LCS Total Knee System—Surgical Procedure; 1989; 36 pages.
Engh et al.; Legent II Surgical Technique; The Concept of Personalization—Total Knee Replacement Using the AMK—Legend II; 1992; 31 pages.
Lotke; Knee Arthroplasty; Primary Total Knees—Standard Principles and Techniques; Raven Press, Ltd.; 5 pages; 1995.
Mills et al.; Use of Computer Tomographic Reconstruction in Planning Osteotomies of the Hip; Jan. 1992; 6 pages.
Radermacher et al.; Image Guided Orthopedic Surgery Using Individual Templates; 10 pages, 1997.
Radermacher et al.; Computer Assisted Matching of Planning and Execution in Orthopedic Surgery; 1993; 2 pages.
Radermacher et al.; Technique for Better Execution of CT Scan Planned Orthopedic Surgery on Bone Structures; 9 pages, 1995.
Radermacher et al.; Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery with Image Based Individual Templates; No. 354, pp. 28-38; 1998; 11 pages.
Sharma et al.; The Role of Knee Alignment in Disease Progression and Functional Decline in Knee Osteoarthritis; Jul. 11, 2001; American Medical Association; 10 pages.
Berry, Seedhom, et al., “Personalised image-based templates for intra-operative guidance,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 111-118, 2005.
Radermacher et al., “Computer-Integrated Orthopaedic Surgery: Connection of Planning and Execution in Surgical Intervention,” Computer Integrated Surgery, 451-463, 1995.
Radermacher et al., “CT Image-Based Planning and Execution of Interventions in Orthopedic Surgery Using Individual Templates—Experimental Results and Aspects of Clinical Applications,” Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery, L.P. Nolte and R. Ganz, eds, 42-52, Hogrefe & Huber Publishing 1999.
Portheine et al.; Development of a clinical demonstrator fro computer assisted orthopedic surgery with CT-image based individual templates; 1997; 6 pages.

Related Publications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	20130190768 A1	Jul 2013	US

Provisional Applications (6)

Number	Date	Country
61308136	Feb 2010	US
60976447	Sep 2007	US
60976448	Sep 2007	US
60976451	Sep 2007	US
60976444	Sep 2007	US
60976446	Sep 2007	US

Continuation in Parts (1)

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	12240990	Sep 2008	US
Child	13580257		US

Customized patient-specific tibial cutting blocks

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

CPC

International Classifications

Term Extension

Abstract