CUT-IN-SAFE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL SYSTEM FOR VEHICLES

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is in the field of vehicle control systems. In particular, the invention relates to an adaptive cruise control system for a vehicle, to a vehicle equipped with such adaptive cruise control system and to a method of controlling the trajectory of a vehicle.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Adaptive cruise control is a broadly used technology in vehicles of all kind. Following preceding vehicles is one of the most frequently-performed tasks in road traffic. To relieve drivers from this often-perceived tedious task, many vehicles are equipped with adaptive cruise control (ACC) systems, which adapt the dynamics of the vehicle to that of preceding vehicles. Despite the large market penetration of this technology, current ACC systems are still not safe in all driving conditions and require supervision by a human driver, in particular in complex situations involving traffic interactions with other vehicles in a proximity of the vehicle in which the ACC system is installed, such as manually driven vehicles having non-predictably trajectories subject to real-time decisions by their human drivers. For example, 14.6% of traffic accidents registered in Germany in 2007 were rear-end collisions.

Safety is and must remain the highest priority when it comes to the configuration of ACC systems. However, once safety can be guaranteed, driving comfort may be a crucial aspect of the commercial viability of safe ACC systems. In terms of comfort, acceleration and acceleration variations, i.e. jerk (the first derivative of acceleration) play a relevant role, inasmuch as acceleration and jerk are perceived by the human sensory system as forces acting upon the human body that tend to be compensated by corresponding muscular activation and which, in the most extreme cases, can induce body injuries. Most known ACC systems, however, only focus in safety when managing safety-risking situations, at the expense of comfort. As a consequence, comfort might be unnecessarily neglected.

Therefore, there is room for technical improvement for current ACC systems.

WO 2004/005092 A1 discloses a driver assisting system for assisting a driver of a vehicle in danger and emergency brake situations, wherein a decision on whether an assisted braking operation should be initiated is made based on different driving parameters, such as driving speed, state of a gas pedal, state of a brake pedal and relative distance and speed with respect to one preceding vehicle.

EP 3 121 076 A2 and US 2009/0299593 A1 describe vehicle control devices configured for controlling a vehicle so as to avoid a collision with an object either by braking the vehicle or, if braking is per se insufficient for avoiding a collision, by combining braking with steering control.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention addresses the aforementioned disadvantages of the prior art and aims at providing an ACC system that can react to a broader range of safety-risking situations without requiring the intervention of a human driver and without compromising comfort more than necessary. The invention refers to an adaptive cruise control (ACC) system for a vehicle according to claim 1, to a vehicle according to claim 15 and to a method of controlling a trajectory of a vehicle according to claim 16. Preferred embodiments of the invention are defined in the appended dependent claims.

The ACC system of the invention comprises a detection module and a safety module. The detection module is configured for detecting one or more preceding vehicles driving ahead of the vehicle and for determining a respective velocity and a respective distance of each of the detected preceding vehicles with respect to the vehicle.

The term “vehicle”, when used herein without further indication, shall refer to the vehicle in which the ACC system is installed. “Preceding vehicle” may refer instead to a vehicle other than “the vehicle”, wherein the preceding vehicle, in particular a rearmost end thereof, such as a rear bumper, precedes the vehicle, in particular a foremost end thereof, such as a front bumper, in the direction of movement of the vehicle. The determined distance may hence correspond to the distance between the parts of the vehicle and the corresponding preceding vehicle that would first come into contact with each other in case of a front-end/rear-end collision between the vehicle and the preceding vehicle. The determined distance may for instance correspond, in each case, to a distance between the front bumper of the vehicle and the rear bumper of the corresponding preceding vehicle.

A preceding vehicle may be aligned with the vehicle in the direction of movement of the vehicle at least within an offset limit. The offset limit may be chosen such that a preceding vehicle needs not be precisely aligned with the vehicle for being regarded as such. For example, if the vehicle is driving on a road with lane markings, any vehicle driving ahead of the vehicle and being, at least in part, within the same lane as the vehicle in which the ACC system is installed, may be regarded to be a preceding vehicle. A velocity of the preceding vehicle may hence be aligned with a velocity of the vehicle. However, the velocity of the preceding vehicle may have a component aligned with the velocity of the vehicle and a component that is not aligned with the velocity of the vehicle, for example when the preceding vehicle is changing lanes. Further, the velocity of the preceding vehicle may be zero. Thus, the fact that the preceding vehicles are defined as vehicles “driving” ahead of the vehicle does not necessarily imply that they must have a non-zero velocity. A preceding vehicle may be a moving preceding vehicle having a non-zero velocity, which may or not coincide in direction with the velocity of the vehicle, or a standing preceding vehicle having a zero-velocity. Further, any vehicle exiting the lane on which the vehicle is driving ahead of the vehicle may continue to be regarded as a preceding vehicle for a predefined time lag.

The velocity and/or distance of the preceding vehicles may be obtained by direct measurement using one or more on-board measurement devices connected to and/or comprised in the detection module, for example radar devices, camera devices, or laser sensor devices, configured for measuring the respective velocities and/or distances of the preceding vehicles with respect to the vehicle. Additionally or alternatively, the detection module can be configured for obtaining the respective velocities and/or distances of the preceding vehicles via an exchange of information between the vehicle and the respective preceding vehicles using inter-vehicle communication systems.

The detection module is further configured for determining whether each of the determined distances is smaller than a respective safety distance. Thus, each of the distances determined for a corresponding preceding vehicle is compared to a respective safety distance. The safety distances may be predefined distances, for example predefined distances stored in a table of values stored in a memory device connected to or comprised in the detection module.

The safety distances may however also correspond, in each case, to a computed distance between the vehicle and the corresponding preceding vehicle over which the vehicle can stop, preferably from a state of maximum acceleration of the vehicle (i.e. from a state in which the acceleration of the vehicle is the maximum possible acceleration the vehicle can achieve), without a collision with the corresponding preceding vehicle in case of a full braking of the corresponding preceding vehicle, i.e. in case the corresponding preceding vehicle decelerates with a minimal acceleration that is possible or is assumed for the corresponding preceding vehicle. Such safety distance can be computed or estimated by the detection module, for example by a processing unit included in or connected to the detection module, based on the corresponding velocity determined for the corresponding preceding vehicle and based on the minimal acceleration (i.e. the maximal amplitude of a negative braking deceleration) that is assumed or is possible for the preceding vehicle. A predefined minimal possible acceleration may be assumed for all preceding vehicles. For the vehicle, a braking deceleration according to a predefined braking acceleration modification scheme may be assumed. The predefined braking acceleration modification scheme may be customisable.

“Acceleration modification scheme” may refer herein to a target modification of the acceleration of the vehicle, in particular over a predefined time interval, according to an arbitrary time-dependent acceleration function that respects one or more predefined boundary conditions. Thus, if the acceleration of the vehicle is modified according to a given acceleration modification scheme, the acceleration of the vehicle may timely evolve in an arbitrary manner as long as the corresponding boundary conditions are respected. The aforesaid “predefined time interval” may correspond to a regular time interval over which the ACC system iteratively operates or to a multiple thereof.

The customisable predefined braking acceleration modification scheme may define a predefined braking acceleration profile and/or a predefined braking jerk profile configured for optimising the comfort sensation of occupants of the vehicle, for example by not exceeding predefined acceleration and/or jerk lower and upper limits.

An “acceleration profile” and a “jerk profile” may refer herein to a time evolution of an acceleration and a jerk of the vehicle, respectively, according to a correspondingly defined time-dependent function a(t) or j(t)=a′(t), wherein “x” denotes the time derivative of x, i.e. wherein j(t) is the time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle.

The customisable predefined braking acceleration modification scheme may be stored in a storage device comprised in or connected to the ACC system. For example, if the predefined braking acceleration modification scheme is based on a predefined braking jerk profile, a time function specifying the time evolution of the jerk of the vehicle according to the braking jerk profile may be stored in such storage device.

The acceleration of the vehicle may be bounded by a value for the minimal acceleration (i.e. the maximal amplitude of a negative braking deceleration) that can be achieved by the vehicle, which can be pre-stored in the detection module. The value for the minimal acceleration of the vehicle may account for dynamic properties of the vehicle that are relevant for deceleration, such as braking power, aerodynamics and/or road-tyre friction. The value for the minimal acceleration that can be achieved by the preceding vehicle can be a predetermined value, a value obtained from the preceding vehicle via inter-vehicle communication or a combination of both. For example, the detection module may be configured for determining, based on visual imaging recognition, a manufacturer and model type or a plate registration number of the preceding vehicle and for obtaining the value for the minimal acceleration that can be achieved by the preceding vehicle from a table of values storing minimal accelerations achievable by different vehicle models of different manufacturers or registered vehicles, accordingly. In some embodiments, the same predefined minimal acceleration may be assumed for any preceding vehicle.

In a situation in which a distance between the vehicle and a corresponding preceding vehicle equals or exceeds the respective safety distance, it is always possible for the vehicle to react to a variation in the trajectory of the preceding vehicle, in particular according to the predefined braking jerk profile, in time to avoid a collision, even if the preceding vehicle suddenly initiates a full braking manoeuvre. Such situations in which the distance between the vehicle and the corresponding preceding vehicle equals or exceeds the respective safety distance may for example arise when the vehicle catches up with a preceding vehicle that is driving on the same lane as the vehicle at a distance greater than the respective safety distance, or when a preceding vehicle enters the lane on which the vehicle is driving, i.e. “cuts-in”, at a distance from the vehicle that equals or exceeds the respective safety distance.

A situation in which the distance between the vehicle and a corresponding preceding vehicle is smaller than the respective safety distance is a situation of risk, inasmuch as, if the preceding vehicle were to perform full braking, a collision between the vehicle and the preceding vehicle could not be avoided simply by decelerating according to the predefined braking jerk profile. This can be the situation, for example, when a preceding vehicle cuts in into the lane on which the vehicle is driving within a distance from the vehicle smaller than the respective safety distance.

The detection module may further be configured for determining an acceleration and/or a velocity of the vehicle. For this purpose, the detection module may be connected with a vehicle trajectory control system configured for controlling a trajectory of the vehicle, wherein the trajectory control module may comprise a motor of the vehicle, a transmission of the vehicle, a braking system of the vehicle, a velocimeter of the vehicle, an accelerometer of the vehicle and/or a wheel motion control system of the vehicle.

The ACC system of the invention further comprises a safety module that is connected to the detection module and configured for determining, for each preceding vehicle of at least a part of the one or more detected preceding vehicles for which the determined distance is smaller than the respective safety distance, i.e. for at least some of the preceding vehicles having a distance smaller than the respective safety distance, a respective candidate target acceleration of the vehicle. The safety module is hence activated when at least one of the one or more preceding vehicles detected by the detection module is detected to be at a distance from the vehicle that is smaller than the respective safety distance. The safety module, then, selects said at least one of the one or more preceding vehicles and determines, for each one of them, a respective candidate target acceleration of the vehicle.

The “candidate target accelerations” may refer to constant acceleration values to be implemented at a particular point in time or time interval, in particular if the ACC system is configured to operate iteratively based on a cyclically repeated operation of the detection module and the safety module at discretised regular time intervals, such that for a regular iteration time interval Δt, new “candidate target accelerations” may be determined by the safety module every time interval Δt. The time interval Δt may be for example 0.5 s or less, preferably 0.1 s or less, more preferably 0.02 s or less. The time interval Δt may correspond to the aforesaid “predefined time interval”. In some embodiments, however, the “candidate target accelerations” may each correspond to a respective acceleration function of time a(t) to be implemented over more than one iteration time interval, over a multiple of the aforesaid iteration time intervals or over a predefined time in a non-iterative approach.

The safety module comprises at least an ICS control unit and an emergency control unit. Optionally, the safety module may further comprise a nominal control unit. For each preceding vehicle associated to a determined distance smaller than the respective safety distance, the respective candidate target acceleration may be determined by the ICS control unit, the emergency control unit or by the nominal control unit.

The ICS control unit is configured for determining whether the vehicle is or will be in an inevitable collision state (“ICS”) with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle. The ICS control unit can hence determine that the vehicle is currently in an ICS state or that an ICS state is possible and/or probable within a predefined time definition or within an uncertainty range of the ICS control unit and hence the vehicle will be in an ICS state. An “inevitable collision state” or “ICS” corresponds to a state of the vehicle in which a collision with the corresponding detected preceding vehicle is inevitable regardless of a modification of the acceleration of the vehicle. In some embodiments, the safety module may define an ICS assuming for the preceding vehicles a predefined safety acceleration. The ICS control unit may be configured for determining whether the vehicle is in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle assuming a predetermined safety acceleration for the corresponding preceding vehicle. The safety module may hence take into account the current velocity and the minimal possible acceleration of the vehicle, as well as the determined distance and velocity of the corresponding preceding vehicle and further assume, for the preceding vehicle, the predetermined safety acceleration. The “minimal possible acceleration” of the vehicle may refer, not just to the maximal force that the braking system of the vehicle can physically exert on the wheels of the vehicle, but rather to the maximal effective resulting deceleration of the vehicle produced by the combined effect of all causes of deceleration and all systems involved in the deceleration, including, for example, aerodynamics, tyre-road friction and/or the intervention of an ABS system. Notably, these causes of deceleration may evolve in time, resulting in a timely varying, in particular progressively decreasing, absolute value of the minimal possible acceleration of the vehicle.

The ICS control unit is configured for assuming an ICS state when there is no feasible control action of the vehicle that ensures that, in this scenario, a collision with the corresponding preceding vehicle at a later time is avoided. In some ICS situations, the collision may still be avoided if the corresponding preceding vehicle accelerates, however, an ICS may be assumed anyway, since whether this happens or not cannot be controlled form the vehicle. The ICS control unit, for example a processing unit thereof, may be configured for solving the equations of motion of the vehicle and the corresponding preceding vehicle taking into account the determined velocity and distance of the corresponding preceding vehicle and taking into account the minimum possible acceleration, i.e. the maximal possible braking deceleration, achievable by the vehicle and the predefined safety acceleration assumed as a minimal possible acceleration of the corresponding preceding vehicle for determining whether the vehicle is in an ICS with respect to the that preceding vehicle, for example using analysis tools and formulae that are known to the skilled person, for instance from S. Bouraine, T. Fraichard, H. Salhi, Provably Safe Navigation for Mobile Robots with Limited Field-of-Views in Dynamic Environments, Autonomous Robots, Springer Verlag, 2012, 32 (3), pp. 267-283.

If the ICS control unit determines that the vehicle is in an ICS with respect to a preceding vehicle, the ICS control unit is configured for determining the respective candidate target acceleration for that preceding vehicle corresponding to the minimal possible acceleration of the vehicle, i.e. to the maximal possible braking deceleration that the vehicle, in particular the braking system of the vehicle, can currently implement. In other words, the candidate target acceleration is determined to correspond to a full braking manoeuvre of the vehicle, such that, if the vehicle immediately implements the candidate target acceleration, i.e. the minimal possible acceleration in this case, the collision is mitigated by decelerating the vehicle as much as possible in the shortest possible time. When the emergency control unit determines the respective candidate target acceleration to correspond to the minimal possible acceleration of the vehicle, the time derivative of the acceleration (the jerk) of the vehicle may be unbounded and may correspond to the minimal possible value of the time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle, i.e. the minimal possible jerk achievable by the vehicle. Thus, when the emergency control unit assumes an ICS, all efforts are directed to mitigating the collision without taking comfort into account: both the acceleration and the jerk of the vehicle can take up values down to the respective minimal values.

The emergency control unit is configured for determining the candidate target acceleration if the ICS control unit determines that the vehicle is not in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle, according to an emergency acceleration modification scheme. The emergency acceleration modification scheme is hence defined for achieving the respective safety distance within a predefined time and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below a first predefined acceleration lower limit. This means that when the acceleration of the vehicle is modified according to the emergency acceleration modification scheme, the acceleration of the vehicle can evolve in different ways but it is always guaranteed—mathematically speaking by imposing corresponding constraints when solving the equations of motion of the vehicle—that the acceleration of the vehicle is modified such that the respective safety distance is achieved within the predefined time and/or such that the value of the acceleration of the vehicle is always greater than or equal to the first predefined acceleration lower limit.

The predefined time may set a time limit within which the vehicle has to establish the corresponding safety distance, in particular without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the first predefined acceleration lower limit. The value of the predefined time may be user-defined, for example a predefined time of 1 s or less.

There may be more than one possible values of the candidate target acceleration fulfilling the conditions of the emergency acceleration modification scheme. In that case, the emergency control unit may be configured for selecting, out of all possible values of the candidate target acceleration, the value having the smallest possible absolute value, such that a variation with respect to a current acceleration of the vehicle is minimised, i.e. such that the jerk of the vehicle is as close to o as possible. Additionally or alternatively, the emergency control unit may be configured for selecting one candidate value among said possible values of the candidate target acceleration according to another optimisation criterion, such as minimising energy consumption.

Since an ICS has been discarded by the ICS control unit, the vehicle is in a situation in which the respective safety distance may be established by the emergency control unit without necessarily performing a full-braking of the vehicle, thereby keeping some degree of comfort.

The ACC system according to the invention hence allows determining a candidate target acceleration of the vehicle for modifying the trajectory of a vehicle, in particular an acceleration and a velocity thereof, in different manners according to different situations, thereby permitting to adapt a comfort level depending on the safety requirements of the different situations.

In a first situation, in case of an ICS, for example as a result of a cutting-in preceding vehicle entering the lane on which the vehicle is driving at a distance from the vehicle below the corresponding safety distance, comfort is disregarded in order to mitigate an eventual collision as much as possible within the shortest possible time by immediately selecting the minimal possible acceleration, discomforting to the occupants of the vehicle though this may be.

In a second situation, in case a preceding vehicle is violating the corresponding safety distance but without causing the vehicle to be in an ICS, the respective safety distance can still be established before a collision without decelerating the vehicle with the minimal possible acceleration of the vehicle, in particular respecting the boundary conditions defined by the emergency acceleration modification scheme.

In some embodiments, the emergency control unit may further be configured for determining, based on the respective distance and the respective velocity, an emergency jerk profile defining a time evolution of the time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle allowing to achieve the respective safety distance within the predefined time and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the first predefined acceleration lower limit. Additionally or alternatively, the emergency control unit may further be configured for determining, based on the respective distance and the respective velocity, an emergency acceleration profile defining a time evolution of the acceleration of the vehicle allowing to achieve the respective safety distance within the predefined time and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the first predefined acceleration lower limit. The emergency control unit may then be configured for determining the respective candidate target acceleration according to the emergency jerk profile and/or to the emergency acceleration profile.

The emergency acceleration profile a_emergency(t) and/or the emergency jerk profile j_emergency(t) are hence generated as a time evolution of the acceleration and jerk of the vehicle respectively, for which the conditions of the emergency acceleration modification scheme are fulfilled taking into account the distance and velocity that have been determined for the corresponding preceding vehicle.

Preferably the emergency acceleration profile a_emergency(t) and/or the emergency jerk profile j_emergency(t) may be chosen among all possible time evolutions of the acceleration and jerk of the vehicle, respectively, fulfilling the conditions of the emergency acceleration modification scheme for which the minimal jerk value is maximal (in order to maximise comfort). Since the emergency acceleration profile a_emergency(t) and/or the emergency jerk profile j_emergency(t) may in particular correspond to a deceleration of the vehicle and may be functions taking negative values only, maximising the minimal jerk value may correspond to having a minimal jerk value as close as possible to zero, i.e. the least negative minimal jerk value possible. The emergency acceleration and jerk profiles can hence define the most comfortable possible way of modifying the acceleration of the vehicle in line with the emergency acceleration modification scheme for the respective distance and the respective velocity determined for the corresponding preceding vehicle.

The safety module of the ACC system of the invention may further comprise a nominal control unit configured for determining, if the ICS control unit determines that the vehicle is not in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle, whether the respective safety distance can be achieved by modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to a comfort acceleration modification scheme. The comfort acceleration modification scheme may be different from the emergency acceleration modification scheme. The comfort acceleration modification scheme is defined for achieving the respective safety distance within the predefined time and without a time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle falling below a predefined acceleration derivative lower limit and/or without an acceleration of the vehicle falling below a second predefined acceleration lower limit. The second predefined acceleration lower limit may be larger than the first of predefined acceleration lower limit defined for the emergency acceleration modification scheme.

Determining whether or not the respective safety distance can be achieved by modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to a comfort acceleration modification scheme may comprise accessing a lookup table saved in a storing device comprised in or connected to the safety module, wherein the lookup table may comprise a large number of previously computed solutions to the equations of motion of the vehicle for different values of the corresponding distance and velocity of a preceding vehicle. For example, if one of such computed solutions stored in the lookup table determines that, for given values of the velocity of the vehicle and of the corresponding distance and velocity of a preceding vehicle, it is not possible to establish the corresponding safety distance within the predetermined time and without the time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the predefined acceleration derivative lower limit, the region of states having smaller values of the corresponding distance of the preceding vehicle, smaller values of the corresponding velocity of the preceding vehicle and larger velocities of the vehicle may also be assumed to correspond to a situation in which it is not possible to establish the corresponding safety distance according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme. If, according to the values stored in the lookup table, the conditions of the comfort acceleration modification scheme can be achieved by at least one solution in which the acceleration of the vehicle takes a given acceleration value or a given acceleration function, the corresponding candidate target acceleration can be determined to correspond to said at least one solution. There may be more than one possible values of the candidate target acceleration fulfilling the conditions of the comfort acceleration modification scheme. In that case, the nominal control unit may be configured for selecting, out of said possible values of the acceleration fulfilling the conditions of the comfort acceleration modification scheme, the possible value having the smallest absolute value as the candidate target acceleration.

While the emergency acceleration modification scheme is defined by the boundary conditions that the respective safety distance should be achieved within the predefined time and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the first predefined acceleration lower limit, the comfort acceleration modification scheme is defined by the boundary conditions that the respective safety distance should also be achieved within the predefined time and, additionally, should be achieved without a time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle (i.e. a jerk of the vehicle) falling below a predefined acceleration derivative lower limit (i.e. a jerk lower limit) and/or without an acceleration of the vehicle falling below a second predefined acceleration lower limit that may be larger than the first predefined acceleration lower limit. The comfort acceleration modification scheme is hence more restrictive than the emergency acceleration modification scheme but may provide a larger degree of comfort if the acceleration of the vehicle is modified according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme.

The nominal control unit is further configured for determining the respective candidate target acceleration according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme if this is feasible, i.e. if the nominal control unit determines that the respective safety distance can be achieved by modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme.

The emergency control unit may further be configured for determining the candidate target acceleration according to the emergency acceleration modification scheme if the nominal control unit determines that the respective safety distance cannot be achieved by modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme and the ICS control unit determines that the vehicle is not in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle.

The nominal control unit hence aims at determining a candidate target acceleration allowing to establish the corresponding safety distance within the predefined time in a comfort-optimised manner, without the jerk of the vehicle falling below the predefined acceleration derivative lower limit and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the second predefined acceleration lower limit. This comfortable solution is preferred, if possible, over the less comfortable solutions provided by the emergency control unit and the ICS control unit. In particular, the candidate target acceleration is determined by the emergency control unit when it cannot be feasibly be determined by the nominal control unit. In other words, if a more comfortable manner (according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme) of establishing safety can be found, said more comfortable manner is prioritised over the less comfortable manner (according to the emergency acceleration modification scheme).

A minimal value of the acceleration of the vehicle or the time derivative thereof according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme may be greater than a minimal value of the acceleration of the vehicle or the time derivative thereof according to the emergency acceleration modification scheme. Both the emergency acceleration modification scheme and the comfort acceleration modification scheme may be configured for achieving the safety distance within the predefined time. However, while the comfort acceleration modification scheme is bounded to not letting the time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle fall below the predefined acceleration derivative lower limit, the emergency acceleration modification scheme is not bounded to this condition. Thus, in some situations, it is possible to establish the corresponding safety distance within the predefined time according to the emergency acceleration modification scheme but not according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme. In other words, when the acceleration of the vehicle is modified according to the emergency acceleration modification scheme, the vehicle may decelerate more rapidly than when the acceleration of the vehicle is modified according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme.

In some embodiments, the nominal control unit may be configured for determining whether the respective safety distance can be achieved according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme assuming that the corresponding preceding vehicle moves at a constant velocity corresponding to the determined respective velocity. The computations may thereby be simplified without substantially compromising safety or comfort.

According to some embodiments, the nominal control unit may further be configured for, if the nominal control unit determines that the respective safety distance can be achieved by modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme, determining, based on the respective distance and the respective velocity determined for the corresponding preceding vehicle, a comfort jerk profile defining a time evolution of the time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle allowing to achieve the respective safety distance within the predefined time without a time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the predefined acceleration derivative lower limit and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the second acceleration lower limit. Additionally or alternatively, the nominal control unit may further be configured for determining, based on the respective distance and the respective velocity, a comfort acceleration profile defining a time evolution of the acceleration of the vehicle allowing to achieve the respective safety distance within the predefined time without a time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the predefined acceleration derivative lower limit and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the second acceleration lower limit. The nominal control unit may then be configured for determining the respective candidate target acceleration according to the comfort jerk profile and/or the comfort acceleration profile.

The comfort acceleration profile and/or the comfort jerk profile j_comfort(t) are hence generated as a time evolution of the acceleration and/or jerk of the vehicle, respectively, for which the conditions of the comfort acceleration modification scheme are fulfilled taking into account the distance and velocity that have been determined for the corresponding preceding vehicle. Preferably, the comfort acceleration profile a_comfort(t) and/or the comfort jerk profile j_comfort(t) are chosen among all possible time evolutions of the acceleration and jerk of the vehicle, respectively, which fulfil the conditions of the comfort acceleration modification scheme and for which the minimal jerk value is maximal, i.e. least negative (in order to maximise comfort). The comfort jerk profile may hence define the most comfortable possible way of modifying the acceleration of the vehicle in line with the comfort acceleration modification scheme for the respective distance and the respective velocity determined for the corresponding preceding vehicle.

Conditions such as “without a time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the predefined acceleration derivative lower limit” (j_comfort(t)≥j_minfor all t) and “without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the second acceleration lower limit” (a_comfort(t)≥a_minfor all t) may be imposed as corresponding constraints when solving the corresponding equations of motion of the vehicle used for determining the corresponding profile.

Notably, while the customisable predefined braking acceleration modification scheme is defined by a predetermined function that may be stored in a storage device comprised in or connected to the ACC system, the comfort profiles (for acceleration and for jerk) and the emergency profiles (for acceleration and for jerk) need not be stored in any storage device inasmuch as they are not predetermined functions but functions that are computed in real time and adapted to a particular situation, i.e. to a particular preceding vehicle and to the respective distance and velocity as determined by the detection module.

“According to the comfort acceleration profile” may refer herein to a time evolution of the acceleration of the vehicle according to the acceleration of the vehicle defined by the comfort acceleration profile, such that for a time evolution over a time interval Δt according to the comfort acceleration profile corresponding to a function a_comfort(t) one has:

a(t)=a_comfort(t)

Likewise, “according to the emergency acceleration profile” may refer herein to a time evolution of the acceleration of the vehicle according to the acceleration of the vehicle defined by the emergency acceleration profile, such that for a time evolution over a time interval Δt according to the emergency acceleration profile corresponding to a function j_emergency(t) one has:

a(t)=a_emergency(t)

“According to the comfort jerk profile” may refer herein to a time evolution of the acceleration of the vehicle according to the time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle defined by the comfort jerk profile, such that for a time evolution over a time interval Δt according to a comfort jerk profile corresponding to a function j_comfort(t) one has:

a(t)=a(t−Δt)+∫_t−Δt^tj_comfort(t)dt.

“According to the emergency jerk profile” may refer herein to a time evolution of the acceleration of the vehicle according to the time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle defined by the emergency jerk profile, such that for a time evolution over a time interval Δt according to an emergency jerk profile corresponding to a function j_emergency(t) one has:

a(t)=a(t−Δt)+∫_t−Δt^tj_emergency(t)dt.

Preferably, the emergency control unit may be configured for determining the emergency jerk profile and/or the emergency acceleration profile if the nominal control unit determines that the respective safety distance cannot be achieved by modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme and/or if the ICS control unit determines that the vehicle is not in an inevitable collision stayed with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle. Accordingly, the emergency jerk profile and/or the emergency acceleration profile may define the most comfortable possible way of modifying the acceleration of the vehicle for the respective distance and the respective velocity determined for the corresponding preceding vehicle when it is not possible to do so according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme.

The ACC system according to the invention may hence allow determining a candidate target acceleration of the vehicle for modifying the trajectory of a vehicle, in particular an acceleration and a velocity thereof, in different manners according to different situations, thereby permitting to adapt a comfort level depending on the safety requirements of the different situations: Additionally to the first situation and a second situation described above, in a third situation, in case the ACC system includes the nominal controller and it is determined that it is possible for the vehicle to establish the corresponding safety distance with the cutting-in preceding according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme, the trajectory of the vehicle is modified in a comfortable manner, such that the deceleration may be hardly perceivable for the occupants of the vehicle.

Determining the respective candidate target acceleration according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme by the nominal control unit may comprise determining the respective candidate acceleration as a first acceleration value a₁, and determining the respective candidate target acceleration according to the emergency acceleration modification scheme by the emergency control unit may comprise determining the respective candidate acceleration as a second acceleration value a₂, wherein the first acceleration value is greater than the second acceleration value a₁>a₂. Thus, the first acceleration value may correspond to less deceleration than the second acceleration value, thereby reflecting a difference in the jerk of the vehicle, which may be smaller (more negative) when the candidate target acceleration is determined according to the emergency acceleration modification scheme than when it is determined according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme. For example, the first and second acceleration values a₁and a₂may correspond to constant values of the acceleration of the vehicle to be implemented according to the corresponding time-dependent jerk profile (the comfort jerk profile or the emergency jerk profile) in a discretised timeline during a given item iteration time interval, such that:

a
₁
=a
_n
=a
_n-1+Int_n(j_comfort),for t=n·Δt;

a
₂
=a
_n
=a
_n-1+Int_n(j_emergency),for t=n·Δt.

where Int_n( ) denotes a function corresponding to a numerical integration of the corresponding jerk function. Notably, the comparison between the first and second acceleration values is a fictitious comparison, inasmuch as both values might not coexist for a given preceding vehicle, since only one of them may be determined according to the situation of the vehicle with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle. However, due to the differences between the emergency acceleration modification scheme and the comfort acceleration modification scheme, and in particular to the bounds applying to the comfort acceleration modification scheme (cf. the predefined time and the jerk lower limit and/or the second acceleration lower limit), which do not apply to the emergency acceleration modification scheme, it can be inferred that the acceleration value to be implemented according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme, i.e. the first acceleration value a₁, may be greater than the acceleration to be implemented according to the emergency acceleration modification scheme, i.e. than the second acceleration value a₂.

Since the acceleration derivative lower limit and/or the (second) acceleration lower limit applying to the comfort acceleration modification scheme do not apply to the emergency acceleration modification scheme, one may also assert that a minimal jerk and/or acceleration value according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme may be greater than a minimal jerk and/or acceleration value according to the emergency acceleration modification scheme. This means, that when the acceleration of the vehicle is modified according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme, the variation of the acceleration over time may be not as negative, i.e. as abrupt, as it can be when the acceleration of the vehicle is modified according to the emergency acceleration modification scheme.

According to some embodiments of the invention, the ACC system may further comprise a distance control module connected with the detection module and configured for, for each of at least a part of the one or more preceding vehicles for which the determined respective distance equals or exceeds the respective safety distance, determining whether the vehicle is in a potential collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle. This means that for those preceding vehicles for which the safety module is not activated because they are not at a distance from the vehicle smaller than the respective safety distance, the distance control module is activated to determine whether a potential collision state exists with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle.

A “potential collision state” corresponds to a state of the vehicle in which, if the corresponding preceding vehicle initiates a full braking manoeuvre (i.e. brakes with a real or assumed minimal acceleration of the preceding vehicle, in particular the aforementioned predefined minimal possible acceleration), a distance between the vehicle and the corresponding preceding vehicle will become smaller than the respective safety distance within a predefined time interval unless the acceleration of the vehicle is modified. The predefined time interval may preferably correspond to the aforementioned iteration time interval Δt. A potential collision state may be determined by the distance control module when, taking into account the current trajectory, i.e. acceleration and velocity, of the vehicle as well as the full braking manoeuvre assumed for the corresponding preceding vehicle and the detected respective distance, the time evolution of the equations of motion of the vehicle and the corresponding preceding vehicle reveal that the respective safety distance, which is currently respected, is about to the violated.

If the distance control module determines that the vehicle is in a potential collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle, the distance control module is further configured for determining a corresponding candidate target acceleration according to a predetermined distance control acceleration modification scheme. The distance control acceleration modification scheme may be configured for keeping at least the safety distance between the vehicle and the preceding vehicle at least within said predefined time interval, wherein said corresponding candidate target acceleration is preferably smaller than a current acceleration of the vehicle and/or equal to or smaller than a candidate target acceleration that would be determined according to the predetermined braking acceleration modification scheme.

In other words, when a potential collision state is determined by the distance control module, the distance control module determines the corresponding candidate target acceleration which, if implemented for modifying the acceleration of the vehicle, makes the vehicle decelerate such that the corresponding safety distance continues to be respected. Instead, if the distance control module determines that the vehicle is not in a potential collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle, the trajectory of the vehicle, in particular the acceleration, may be left unmodified.

In some embodiments, the distance control acceleration modification scheme may correspond to the predefined braking acceleration modification scheme used for defining the safety distances. This way, even if the preceding vehicle were to suddenly initiate a full-braking manoeuvre during the current iteration interval, a potential collision could still be avoided after detecting it during the next iteration interval, in particular by modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to the predefined braking acceleration modification scheme.

The distance control module, which is activated for preceding vehicles respecting the corresponding safety distance for which the activation of the safety module is not necessary, is configured for ensuring that no trajectory modification is implemented which would subsequently lead to a violation of the corresponding safety distance. Thus, as far as the controllable behaviour of the vehicle is concerned, the safety distance with respect to the preceding vehicles is always maintained. If a preceding vehicle suddenly violates the corresponding safety distance, for example by laterally cutting-in into the lane on which the vehicle is driving at a distance from the vehicle below the corresponding safety distance, the safety module is activated to resolve the situation as described above. Otherwise, the distance control module ensures that the safety distance with respect to each preceding vehicle is always maintained, modifying the acceleration of the vehicle, in particular by modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to the distance control acceleration modification scheme, if necessary by correspondingly determining the candidate target acceleration.

Modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to the distance control acceleration modification scheme by the distance control module may comprise modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to a predefined distance control acceleration profile and/or to a predefined distance control jerk profile, and the distance control module may be correspondingly configured. The distance control acceleration profile and/or the distance control jerk profile may be a monotonously decreasing time-dependent function and may be bounded to a predefined minimal jerk. By modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to the distance control acceleration profile and/or the distance control jerk profile, the deceleration of the vehicle can be controlled in a comfortable manner in case a potential collision state is determined. The distance control acceleration profile and/or the distance control jerk profile may be customisable.

According to some embodiments, said at least a part of the one or more detected preceding vehicles for which the determined distance is smaller than the respective safety distance, i.e. the preceding vehicles for which the safety module is activated to determine the corresponding candidate target accelerations, and/or said at least a part of the one or more preceding vehicles for which the determined distance equals or exceeds the respective safety distance, i.e. the preceding vehicles for which the distance control module is activated to determine the corresponding candidate target accelerations, comprises in each case, preceding vehicles for which an exclusion condition is not fulfilled, wherein the exclusion condition is fulfilled for a given preceding vehicle if

- another detected preceding vehicle exists for which the determined distance and the determined velocity are respectively smaller than the distance and velocity determined for said given preceding vehicle; and/or
- a difference between the distance determined for said given preceding vehicle and a stopping distance of the vehicle is equal to or greater than zero or a security margin, wherein the stopping distance of the vehicle corresponds to a distance covered by the vehicle until the vehicle comes to a zero-velocity in particular according to the predefined braking acceleration modification scheme.

If any or both of the aforesaid two conditions are fulfilled for a given preceding vehicle, the exclusion condition is fulfilled, which means that said given preceding vehicle does not belong to the at least a part of the one or more detected preceding vehicles for which a corresponding candidate target acceleration is determined by the safety module or the distance control module. In other words, if exclusion condition is fulfilled by a given preceding vehicle, said given preceding vehicle is ignored in terms of determining candidate target accelerations. This is justified as follows:

For the first condition: if there exists another preceding vehicle for which the determined distance and the determined velocity are respectively smaller than the distance and velocity determined for said given preceding vehicle this means that the given preceding vehicle is a faster preceding vehicle that can be ignored, in particular when it is assumed that all preceding vehicles have the same minimal acceleration (i.e. the same maximal deceleration), since a collision with said given preceding vehicle can be excluded if it is avoided for said another preceding vehicle, i.e. for the slower and closer preceding vehicle.

For the second condition: if the difference between the distance determined for said given preceding vehicle and the stopping distance of the vehicle is equal to or greater than zero or a security margin, this means that, even if the given preceding vehicle were to instantaneously stop at a position corresponding to the (current) respective detected position, the vehicle, moving with its current velocity and preferably accelerating as much as possible, according to a maximal acceleration of the vehicle, could still stop in time to avoid a collision with said given preceding vehicle, in particular according to the predefined braking acceleration modification scheme. The security margin may correspond to a distance covered by the vehicle during the predefined time interval, in particular while maintaining the current trajectory and preferably with the maximal possible acceleration of the vehicle, such as to account for the dynamics of the vehicle during the current iteration.

In any of the considered cases, if the given preceding vehicle fulfils the exclusion condition, it may be ignored in order to spare computational resources because it is not relevant for guaranteeing the safety of the vehicle for practical purposes. The candidate target accelerations are then only computed for preceding vehicles that are relevant for ensuring the safety of the vehicle, i.e. for preceding vehicles not fulfilling the exclusion condition.

In some embodiments, the ACC system of the invention may further comprise a selection module configured for selecting, among all candidate target accelerations determined by the safety module or the distance control module, a minimal candidate target acceleration, wherein the minimal candidate target acceleration is smaller than all other candidate target accelerations. By selecting the minimal candidate target acceleration, the selection module ensures the selection of the candidate target acceleration required for ensuring the safety of the vehicle in view of the preceding vehicle causing the most dangerous situation, i.e. requiring the greatest deceleration. This is implemented by having the safety module and the distance control module determine the respective candidate target accelerations for the corresponding preceding vehicles and then selecting, by the selection module, the smallest candidate target acceleration, i.e. the strongest deceleration needed.

According to some embodiments, the ACC system may further comprise a velocity control module connected with the detection module and configured for determining a target velocity of the vehicle configured for not exceeding a detection range velocity. The detection range velocity is a maximal velocity from which the vehicle can transition to a zero-velocity state over a detection range distance, preferably from a state of maximal acceleration of the vehicle (in order to maximise the safety margin) and/or according to the predefined braking acceleration modification scheme. The detection range distance is the maximum distance from the vehicle at which a preceding vehicle can be detected by the detection module. For example, if the detection range distance is 200 m, a preceding vehicle can be detected at a distance up to 200 m from the vehicle, while it cannot be detected at a distance greater than 200 m from the vehicle.

Once the detection module detects one or more preceding vehicles, the safety module and/or the distance control module are activated for determining the corresponding candidate target accelerations. The safety module is activated if at least one of the one or more preceding vehicles is detected at a distance from the vehicle smaller than the corresponding safety distance, for example in case of a preceding vehicle cutting-in in front of the vehicle at a distance smaller than the corresponding safety distance. The distance control module may be activated irrespectively of whether at least one of the one or more preceding vehicles is detected at a distance from the vehicle equal to or greater than the corresponding safety distance or not.

The present invention further refers to a vehicle comprising a vehicle trajectory control system and an ACC system according to any of the previously described embodiments. The vehicle trajectory control system is configured for controlling an acceleration and/or a velocity of the vehicle according to a target velocity or to a candidate target acceleration determined by the ACC system, respectively. The vehicle trajectory control system may comprise, for example, a motor, a transmission system and/or a braking system of the vehicle allowing to selectively accelerate or decelerate the vehicle in a controlled manner. In the ACC system, candidate target accelerations may be determined by the safety module and/or by the distance control module for corresponding preceding vehicles.

Preferably, the vehicle trajectory control system may be configured for controlling the acceleration and/or the velocity of the vehicle according to a minimal candidate target acceleration selected among a plurality of candidate target accelerations determined for a corresponding plurality of detected preceding vehicles, for example by a selection module of the ACC system. Depending on the situation, for example in case no preceding vehicle is detected by the detection module of the ACC system, no candidate target acceleration may be determined but a velocity control module of the ACC system may determine a detection range velocity. The vehicle trajectory control system may hence also be configured for controlling the velocity of the vehicle according to a target velocity corresponding to the detection range velocity of the vehicle.

The vehicle of the invention, by means of the ACC system it comprises, is able to implement adaptive cruise control in a safe manner with improved comfort, sacrificing comfort on behalf of safety when necessary, but providing improved comfort when safety so allows.

The present invention further refers to a method of determining a target acceleration of a vehicle. The method may be a computer-implemented method and/or a method implemented by an ACC system according to any of the embodiments described above, wherein the described modules, in particular the detection module, the safety module, the velocity control module, the selection module and the distance control module may be or correspond to different modules of a software product implemented by one or more processors. However, the described modules, in particular the detection module, the safety module, the velocity control module, the selection module and the distance control module may be or correspond to different correspondingly configured processors.

The method comprises detecting one or more preceding vehicles driving ahead of the vehicle, in particular one or more preceding vehicles driving on the same lane as the vehicle. The one or more preceding vehicles may be detected by the detection module of the ACC system of the invention.

The method further comprises, determining a velocity and a distance of each of the one or more detected preceding vehicles with respect to the vehicle, in particular by the detection module of the ACC system of the invention. Determining the respective velocities and distances may comprise, in each case, directly measuring corresponding velocities and distances or receiving and interpreting signals containing information about the corresponding velocities and distances, for example by means of an inter-vehicle communication system.

The method further comprises determining the target acceleration by determining, for each preceding vehicle of at least a part of the one or more detected preceding vehicles, i.e. for each or some of the detected preceding vehicles, a respective candidate target acceleration, and by selecting as the target acceleration the minimal candidate target acceleration, i.e. the smallest candidate target acceleration among all determined candidate target accelerations.

Determining a corresponding candidate target acceleration of a corresponding preceding vehicle comprises in each case, determining whether the corresponding determined distance is smaller than a respective safety distance, which corresponds to the safety distance described above for the ACC system of the invention. The safety distance (sd_i) may hence in particular correspond to a distance between the vehicle (V_o) and a corresponding preceding vehicle (V_i) over which the vehicle (V_o) can stop without a collision with the corresponding preceding vehicle (V_i) in case of a full braking of the corresponding preceding vehicle (V_i), preferably from a state of maximal acceleration of the vehicle and/or according to a predefined braking jerk profile (corresponding to the previously described predefined braking jerk profile). If the corresponding determined distance is smaller than the respective safety distance, the method further comprises:

Determining whether the vehicle is or will be in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle, and, if the vehicle is in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle, determining the corresponding candidate target acceleration as a minimal possible acceleration of the vehicle. As previously explained, the inevitable collision state corresponds to a state of the vehicle in which a collision with the corresponding preceding vehicle is inevitable regardless of a modification of the acceleration of the vehicle, in particular assuming for the corresponding preceding vehicle a predetermined safety acceleration; and

if the vehicle is not in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle, determining the corresponding candidate target acceleration according to an emergency acceleration modification scheme, wherein the emergency acceleration modification scheme is defined for achieving the respective safety distance within a predefined time and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below a first predefined acceleration lower limit.

In some embodiments, if the corresponding determined distance is smaller than the respective safety distance and the vehicle is not in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle, determining the corresponding candidate target acceleration for a corresponding preceding vehicle may further comprise:

determining whether it is feasible to achieve the respective safety distance by modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to a comfort acceleration modification scheme, wherein the comfort acceleration modification scheme is defined for achieving the respective safety distance within a predefined time and/or without a time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle falling below a predefined acceleration derivative lower limit and/or without an acceleration of the vehicle falling below a second predefined acceleration lower limit, and

if it is feasible to achieve the respective safety distance according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme, determining the corresponding candidate target acceleration according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme. The corresponding candidate target acceleration may then be determined according to the emergency acceleration modification scheme if the vehicle is not in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle and it is not feasible to achieve the respective safety distance according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme.

Determining whether it is feasible to achieve the respective safety distance by modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to a comfort acceleration modification scheme may comprise assuming that the corresponding preceding vehicle moves at a constant velocity, preferably corresponding to the determined respective velocity.

The method may further comprise determining, based on the respective distance and the respective velocity determined for the corresponding preceding vehicle, an emergency jerk profile defining a time evolution of the time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle allowing to achieve the respective safety distance within the predefined time and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the first predefined acceleration lower limit. Additionally or alternatively, the method may comprise determining, based on the respective distance and the respective velocity, an emergency acceleration profile defining a time evolution of the acceleration of the vehicle allowing to achieve the respective safety distance within the predefined time and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the first predefined acceleration lower limit. Determining the respective candidate target acceleration according to the emergency acceleration modification scheme may then comprise determining the respective candidate target acceleration according to the emergency jerk profile and/or to the emergency acceleration profile.

In some embodiments, the method may further comprise determining, based on the respective distance and the respective velocity determined for the corresponding preceding vehicle, an emergency jerk profile defining a time evolution of the time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle allowing to achieve the respective safety distance within the predefined time (t_c) and without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the predefined acceleration lower limit and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the second acceleration lower limit. Additionally or alternatively, the method may comprise determining, based on the respective distance and the respective velocity, a comfort acceleration profile defining a time evolution of the acceleration of the vehicle allowing to achieve the respective safety distance within the predefined time without a time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the predefined acceleration derivative lower limit and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the second acceleration lower limit. Determining the respective candidate target acceleration according to the emergency acceleration modification scheme may then comprise determining the respective candidate target acceleration according to the comfort jerk profile and/or to the comfort acceleration profile.

Preferably, the emergency jerk profile and/or the emergency acceleration profile may be determined if the respective safety distance cannot be achieved by modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme and/or if the vehicle is not in an inevitable collision stayed with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle.

Determining whether the vehicle is in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle may comprise assuming a predetermined safety acceleration for the corresponding preceding vehicle.

Determining the respective candidate target acceleration according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme may comprise determining the respective candidate acceleration as a first acceleration value; and wherein determining the respective candidate target acceleration according to the emergency acceleration modification scheme comprises determining the respective candidate acceleration as a second acceleration value; wherein the first acceleration value is greater than the second acceleration value.

In some embodiments, determining the corresponding candidate target acceleration of a corresponding preceding vehicle may further comprise, if the corresponding determined distance equals or exceeds the respective safety distance, determining whether the vehicle is in a potential collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle, wherein the potential collision state corresponds to a state of the vehicle in which if the corresponding preceding vehicle initiates a full braking manoeuvre a distance between the vehicle and the corresponding preceding vehicle will become smaller than the respective safety distance within a predefined time interval unless the acceleration of the vehicle is modified (as previously defined). If the vehicle is in a potential collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle, determining the corresponding candidate target acceleration of a corresponding preceding vehicle may further comprise determining the corresponding candidate target acceleration (cta_i) according to a predetermined distance control acceleration modification scheme. The distance control acceleration modification scheme may correspond to the predefined braking acceleration modification scheme.

According to some embodiments, said at least a part of the one or more detected preceding vehicles, i.e. the preceding vehicles for which a respective candidate target acceleration is determined, comprises preceding vehicles for which an exclusion condition is not fulfilled, wherein the exclusion condition is fulfilled for a given preceding vehicle if

- there exists another preceding vehicle for which the determined distance and the determined velocity are respectively smaller than the distance and velocity determined for said given preceding vehicle; and/or
- a difference between the distance determined for said given preceding vehicle and a stopping distance of the vehicle is equal to or greater than zero or a security margin, wherein the stopping distance of the vehicle corresponds to a distance covered by the vehicle until the vehicle comes to a zero-velocity state when performing a full braking manoeuvre until, in particular according to a predefined braking acceleration modification scheme.

This exclusion condition corresponds to the exclusion condition previously described for the ACC system of the invention.

In preferred embodiments of the invention, the method may be repeated in regular time intervals. Preferably, the regular time intervals may correspond to the aforementioned iteration time interval Δt, such that the steps of detecting one or more preceding vehicles, determining a velocity and a distance of each of them, and determining a target acceleration, may be cyclically repeated every time interval Δt.

In some embodiments, the method may further comprise determining a target velocity of the vehicle configured for not exceeding a detection range velocity, wherein the detection range velocity is a maximal velocity from which the vehicle can transition to a zero-velocity state over a detection range distance, wherein the detection range distance is the maximum distance from the vehicle at which a preceding vehicle can be detected by the detection module, preferably from a state of maximal acceleration of the vehicle and/or according to a predefined braking acceleration modification scheme, in particular from a state of maximal acceleration of the vehicle and/or according to a predefined braking acceleration modification scheme.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a schematic representation of a vehicle according to embodiments of the invention.

FIG. 2 schematically illustrates an adaptive cruise control system according to embodiments of the invention connected to a vehicle trajectory control system.

FIG. 3 schematically illustrates a first traffic situation of a vehicle with no preceding vehicles driving ahead of the vehicle.

FIG. 4 schematically illustrates an exemplary predefined braking jerk profile.

FIG. 5 schematically illustrates a second traffic situation of a vehicle with preceding vehicles driving ahead of the vehicle.

FIG. 6 schematically illustrates a third traffic situation of a vehicle with preceding vehicles driving ahead of the vehicle.

FIG. 7 shows a flow diagram schematically illustrating a method of determining a candidate target acceleration of a vehicle according to embodiments of the invention.

FIG. 8 schematically illustrates an exemplary comfort jerk profile (FIG. 8a) and an exemplary emergency jerk profile (FIG. 8b).

FIG. 9 shows a flow diagram schematically illustrating a method of determining a target acceleration of a vehicle according to embodiments of the invention.

DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to a preferred embodiment illustrated in the drawings, and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended, such alterations and further modifications in the illustrated apparatus and such further applications of the principles of the invention as illustrated therein being contemplated as would normally occur now or in the future to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates.

FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a situation in which a vehicle V_ocomprising a vehicle trajectory control system 40 and an adaptive cruise control (ACC) system 10 is driving on a road. The vehicle trajectory control system 40 is configured for controlling an acceleration a_oand a velocity v_oof the vehicle V_oand can comprise, for example, the motor, the transmission system and the braking system of the vehicle V_o. The vehicle trajectory control system 40 is operatively connected with the ACC system 10 and can adjust the acceleration and the velocity of the vehicle V_obased on a control instruction received from the ACC system 10.

Ahead of the vehicle V_o, at a distance d₁from the vehicle V_o, a preceding vehicle V₁is driving in the same direction as the vehicle V_owith a velocity v₁. As seen in FIG. 1, the distance d₁is measured between the front bumper of the vehicle V_oand the rear bumper of the preceding vehicle V₁.

FIG. 2 shows a schematic view of the components of the ACC system 10 of the vehicle V_o. The ACC system 10 comprises a detection module 12, a safety module 14, a distance control module 20, a selection module 22 and a velocity control module 24. Each of the safety module 14, the distance control module 20 and the velocity control module 24 are connected with the detection module 12. The safety module 14 and the distance control module 20 are connected with the selection module 22. The safety module 14 comprises a nominal control unit 16, an emergency control unit 18 and an ICS control unit 17. Although not shown in FIG. 2, the ACC system 10 comprises a connection port, by which the ACC system 10, in particular the selection module 22 and the velocity control module 24, are connected with the vehicle trajectory control system 40 in order to provide control instructions to the vehicle trajectory control system 40. Each of the modules 12, 14, 20, 22, 24 and 40 and each of the control units 16, 17 and 18 can be corresponding modules of a software product that are executed by one or more processors, but they can also correspond to one or more independent processors. For example, each of the modules 12, 14, 20, 22, 24 and 40 and each of the control units 16, 17 and 18 can be an independent processor. In other examples, the modules 12, 14, 20, 22, 24 and the control units 16, 17 and 18 can correspond to one processor while the system 40 corresponds to another processor.

The detection module 12 comprises a system of radar sensor devices mounted at the front of the vehicle V_othat are configured for detecting the preceding vehicle V₁(and any other preceding vehicle driving ahead of the vehicle V_o) and for measuring, for each preceding vehicle, a corresponding distance with respect to the vehicle V_o, such as the distance d₁in FIG. 1, and a corresponding velocity with respect to the vehicle, such as velocity v₁in FIG. 1. The detection module 12 can detect and measure the distance and velocity of any preceding vehicle driving ahead of the vehicle V_owithin a detection range distance d_dr, which is the maximum distance from the vehicle V_o, at which a preceding vehicle can be detected by the detection module 12.

In the situation schematically shown in FIG. 3, the vehicle V_ois driving on the middle lane L₂of a three-lane road having three lanes L₁, L₂, and L₃, with no preceding vehicle driving ahead of the vehicle V_owithin the detection range distance d_dr. In this situation, no preceding vehicle is detected by the detection module 12 and the velocity control module 24 is activated by the detection module 12. The velocity control module 24 then determines a target velocity v_targetof the vehicle V_o, which is transmitted to the vehicle trajectory control system 40 being implemented as the velocity of the vehicle V_o.

The target velocity v_targetis configured for not exceeding a detection range velocity v_dr, which is the maximum velocity from which the vehicle V_ocan transition to a zero-velocity or rest state over the detection range distance d_drwhen driving with the maximal possible acceleration of the vehicle and according to a customisable predefined braking jerk profile j_brake(t), i.e. according to:

a
_o(t+Δt)=a_o(t)+∫_t^t+Δtj_brake(τ)dτ.

wherein Δt is the iteration interval, which in the example under consideration is Δt=0.02 s.

FIG. 4 shows an exemplary braking jerk profile j_brake(t). The braking jerk profile j_brake(t) is a predefined function that is stored in a storage device (not shown) comprised in the ACC system to which the velocity control module 24 is connected. The predefined braking jerk profile j_brake(t) is designed for providing a comfortable deceleration of the vehicle V_o.

The velocity control module 24 hence limits the velocity of the vehicle V_osuch that, if a standing preceding vehicle having a zero velocity were to appear suddenly within the detection range distance d_dr, the vehicle V_o, even if currently accelerating at the maximal possible acceleration, could brake according to the corresponding predefined braking jerk profile and come to a zero velocity state over the detection range distance d_drwithout colliding with such standing preceding vehicle. In the situation illustrated in FIG. 3, the safety module 14, the distance control module 20 and the selection module 22 can remain deactivated.

FIG. 5 schematically illustrates a further exemplary situation on the same three lane road shown in FIG. 3, but in which three preceding vehicles V₁, V₂, and V₃are driving ahead of the vehicle V_o. The preceding vehicle V₃is driving entirely within the same lane L₂as the vehicle V_o. The preceding vehicle V₁is moving laterally and changing lane from lane L₂to lane L₁, i.e. exiting the lane L2, but still being partly within it. The preceding vehicle V₂is moving laterally and changing lane from lane L₃to lane L₂, i.e. entering the lane L2, but still being partly within lane L₃. The detection module 12 is however configured for detecting not only the preceding vehicle V₃, but also each of the preceding vehicles V₁and V₂as preceding vehicles.

FIG. 6 schematically illustrates a further exemplary situation in which a preceding vehicle V₄is driving ahead of the vehicle V_o, changing from the lane L₁into the lane L₂, on which the vehicle V_ois driving.

FIGS. 5 and 6 illustrate different possible situations, which may coexist. In the following, it will be assumed for explanatory purposes that the situations illustrated in FIGS. 5 and 6 coexist and all four preceding vehicles V₁, V₂, V₃and V₄are driving in front of the vehicle V_oand are detected by the detection module 12.

The ACC system 10 determines a target acceleration a_targetof the vehicle V_oby determining, for each of the preceding vehicles V₁, V₂, V₃and V₄a candidate target acceleration according to a method 200 that is schematically illustrated in FIGS. 7 and 9.

For each of the preceding vehicles V₁, V₂, V₃and V₄, the ACC system executes, at 202_i, the method 100_iillustrated in FIG. 7, which starts by detecting, at 102_i, each of the preceding vehicles V₁, V₂, V₃and V₄by the detection module 12, any by determining, at 104_i, the corresponding distance and velocity d_i, v_i, namely (d₁, v₁), (d₂, v₂), (d₃, v₃) and (d₄, v₄), respectively, for example by direct measurement using the radar sensor devices of the detection module 12. Based on the corresponding distance and velocity d_i, v_idetermined for each preceding vehicle, the detection module 12 determines in each case the corresponding safety distance sd_ias the distance from the vehicle V_oover which the vehicle V_ocan stop according to the predefined braking jerk profile j_brake(t) without a collision with the corresponding preceding vehicle V_iin case of a full braking of the corresponding preceding vehicle V from a state of maximal acceleration of the vehicle V_o.

In the situation shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, the preceding vehicles V₁and V₂are at a distance d₁, d₂from the vehicle V_osmaller than a respective safety distance sd₁and sd₂, respectively, while the preceding vehicles V₃and V₄are at a respective distance d₃, d₄from the vehicle V_ogreater than the corresponding safety distance sd₃and sd₄.

At 106_i, the detection module 12 compares, for each preceding vehicle V_i, the computed safety distance sd_ito the respective determined distance d_iand, based thereon, activates the safety module 14 or the distance control module 20 for determining a corresponding candidate target acceleration cta_i.

If the outcome of 106_ireveals that the determined distance d_iis greater than or equal to the corresponding safety distance sd_i, as is the case for the preceding vehicles V₃and V₄, the method 100_iproceeds to 108_i, where it is checked whether any of the preceding vehicles V₃and V₄fulfils an exclusion condition.

The exclusion condition is fulfilled for a preceding vehicle V if

- there exists another preceding vehicle V_jfor which the determined distance d_jand the determined velocity v; are respectively smaller than the distance and velocity determined for said given preceding vehicle (d_j<d_i, v_j<v_i); and/or
- a difference between the distance determined for said given preceding vehicle d_jand a stopping distance d_stopof the vehicle V_ois equal to or greater than zero or a security margin, wherein the stopping distance d_stopof the vehicle corresponds to a distance covered by the vehicle V_ountil the vehicle comes to a zero-velocity state when decelerating according to the predefined braking jerk profile.

In the situation shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, if for example the preceding vehicle V₃is further away from the vehicle V_oand moving faster than the preceding vehicles V₄, the preceding vehicle V₃fulfils the first condition and hence the exclusion condition too. Therefore, the method 100₃(i.e. the method 100_iwhen carried out for determining the candidate target acceleration for the preceding vehicle V₃) ends after 108₃and returns no candidate target acceleration (cf. “END” in FIG. 7).

For a preceding vehicle not fulfilling the exclusion condition, for example for the preceding vehicle V₄, the method continues to 110_iwith the activation of the distance control module 20 for determining the candidate target acceleration cta_i.

At 110_i, the distance control module 20 solves the equation of motion of the vehicle V_oand the preceding vehicle V₄taking into account the velocity and acceleration of the vehicle V_o, the determined velocity v₄of the preceding vehicle V₄and the determined distance d₄between the vehicle V_oand the preceding vehicle V₄and determines whether the respective safety distance sd₄will be violated during the next iteration, i.e. during the coming predefined time interval Δt from a current time t_nowassuming that the velocities of the vehicle V_oand the preceding vehicle V₄remain unchanged. If this is the case, the candidate target acceleration cta₄is determined, at 114_i, according to the predefined braking jerk profile j_brake(t) shown in FIG. 4. Otherwise, cta₄is determined, at 112_i, to correspond to the current acceleration a_oof the vehicle, such that the trajectory of the vehicle V_ois left unaffected.

If the outcome of 106_ireveals that the determined distance d_iis smaller than the corresponding safety distance sd_i, as is the case for the preceding vehicles V₁and V₂, the safety module 14 is activated for determining the corresponding candidate target accelerations. The method 100_iproceeds to 120_i, wherein the ICS control unit 17 determines whether the vehicle V_ois in an ICS with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle V_i, assuming that the corresponding preceding vehicle V_iis decelerating with a predetermined safety acceleration a_safe, for example a predetermined safety acceleration a_safe=−3 ms⁻². If the result of this test is positive, the corresponding candidate target acceleration cta_iis determined to correspond to the minimal possible acceleration a_o^minof the vehicle V_o, i.e. the candidate target acceleration is chosen to correspond to the vehicle V_oinitiating a full braking manoeuvre.

If the result of the test at 120_iis negative, meaning that the corresponding preceding vehicle V_iis not in an ICS situation, the nominal control unit 16 determines, at 124_i, by solving the equations of motion of the vehicle V_oand the corresponding preceding vehicle V_i(e.g. V₁or V₂in this case), whether it is feasible to establish the corresponding safety distance sd_iby modifying the acceleration a_oof the vehicle V_oaccording to a comfort acceleration modification scheme, e.g. within a predefined time limit t_cand without the jerk j_o=da_o/dt of the vehicle V_ofalling below a predefined jerk lower limit j_lim, and assuming that the corresponding preceding vehicle V_imoves at a constant velocity corresponding to the determined respective velocity v_i. In other configurations, the acceleration modification scheme may additionally or alternatively impose the condition that the acceleration a_oof the vehicle V_oshould not fall below a predefined acceleration lower limit, for example a_min=−5 ms⁻². In the example under consideration, the predefined time is t_c=2 s and the predefined jerk lower limit is j_lim=−10 ms⁻³.

If the nominal control unit 16 determines at 124₁that it is feasible to establish the corresponding safety distance sd_iby modifying the acceleration a_oof the vehicle V_oaccording to a comfort acceleration modification scheme, i.e. if the result of the test at 124_iis positive, the nominal control unit 16 determines, at 126_i, a comfort jerk profile j_comfort(t) configured for modifying the acceleration a_oof the vehicle V_oaccording to the comfort acceleration modification scheme with the minimal possible jerk and taking into account the corresponding distance d_iand velocity v_idetermined for the corresponding preceding vehicle V_i.

The comfort jerk profile j_comfort(t) is determined by determining solutions to the equations of motion of the vehicle V_oand the corresponding preceding vehicle V_iimposing the aforesaid boundary conditions defined by the comfort acceleration modification scheme and choosing, among all possible solutions, the solution j(t) for which the minimal value of the jerk of the vehicle j_comfortmin is maximal, i.e. for which j_comfortmin closest to zero, in order to maximise comfort.

An exemplary comfort jerk profile j_comfort(t) is schematically illustrated in FIG. 8a. As seen in FIG. 8a, the jerk according to the comfort jerk profile j_comfort(t) does not fall below the predefined jerk lower limit j_lim.

After determining the comfort jerk profile j_comfort(t) for the preceding vehicle V_i, the nominal control unit 16 then sets, at 128_i, the corresponding candidate target acceleration cta_ito a first acceleration value a₁determined according to the comfort jerk profile j_comfort(t), i.e. according to:

cta
_i
=a
₁
=a
₀(τ=0)+∫_τ^τ+Δtj_comfort(τ)dτ.

Otherwise, if the result of the test at 124_iis negative, the emergency control unit 18 is activated to determine, at 130_i, an emergency jerk profile j_emergency(t) configured for modifying the acceleration a_oof the vehicle V_oaccording to an emergency modification scheme, i.e. within the predefined time t_cand such that the acceleration of the vehicle a_odoes not fall below a predefined acceleration lower limit a_min=−10 ms⁻², but without the jerk of the vehicle being bound by j_lim.

The emergency jerk profile j_emergency(t) is determined by determining solutions to the equations of motion of the vehicle V_oand the corresponding preceding vehicle V_iimposing the aforesaid boundary conditions defined by the emergency acceleration modification scheme and choosing, among all possible solutions, the solution j(t) for which the minimal value of the jerk of the vehicle j_emergency^minis maximal, i.e. for which j_emergency^minis closest to zero, in order to maximise comfort.

An exemplary emergency jerk profile j_emergency(t) is schematically illustrated in FIG. 8b. As seen in FIG. 8b, the jerk according to the emergency jerk profile j_emergency(t) does fall below the predefined jerk lower limit j_lim, unlike the comfort jerk profile j_comfort(t). The minimal jerk value of the comfort jerk profile j_comfort^minis greater than a minimal jerk value of the emergency jerk profile j_emergency^min(cf. FIG. 8a). Thus, the acceleration of the vehicle V_ocan be more rapidly reduced according to the emergency jerk profile j_emergency(t) than according to the comfort jerk profile j_comfort(t) but causing to the occupants a lower degree of comfort.

After determining the emergency jerk profile j_emergency(t) for the preceding vehicle V_iat 130_i, the emergency control unit 18 sets, at 132_i, the corresponding candidate target acceleration cta₁or cta₂to a second acceleration value a₂determined according to the emergency jerk profile j_emergency(t), i.e. according to:

cta
_i
=a
₂
=a
₀(τ=0)+∫_τ^τ+Δtj_emergency(τ)dτ.

FIG. 9 schematically illustrates how the target acceleration a_targetis determined by the ACC system 10 by determining for each of the preceding vehicles V₁, V₂, V₃and V₄corresponding candidate target acceleration is. The method 100_iis carried out, sequentially or in parallel, for each of the preceding vehicles V₁, V₂, V₃and V₄at 202₁to 202₄, respectively.

For each of the preceding vehicles V₁, V₂, V₃and V₄, the corresponding method 100_iproduces, as an output, a corresponding candidate target acceleration cta_i, depending on the relative situation of that particular preceding vehicle V_iwith respect to the vehicle V_o.

In the exemplary situation illustrated in FIG. 5, no ICS is determined for either of the preceding vehicles V₁or V₂. For the preceding vehicle V₁, the nominal control unit 16 determines at 124₁, according to the equations of motion of the vehicle V_oand the preceding vehicle V₁, that it is not feasible to establish the safety distance sd₁within the predetermined time t_cby modifying the acceleration a_oof the vehicle V_owithout the jerk of the vehicle falling below the predefined jerk lower limit is j_lim. Therefore, the candidate target acceleration cta_iis determined by the emergency control unit 18 at 132₁as the outcome of the method 100₁to correspond to

cta
₁
=a
₂
=a
₀(τ=0)+∫_τ^τ+Δtj_emergency(τ)dτ.

This corresponds to the value a₂, which is smaller than the value a₁that would have been determined for the preceding vehicle V₁if the result of the test at 124₁had been positive.

For the preceding vehicle V₂, the nominal control unit 16 determines at 124₂, according to the equations of motion of the vehicle V_oand the preceding vehicle V₂, that it is feasible to establish the safety distance sd₂within the predetermined time t_cwithout the jerk of the vehicle falling below the predefined jerk lower limit is j_limby modifying the acceleration a_oof the vehicle V_oaccording to the comfort jerk profile j_comfort(t) determined at 126₂for the preceding vehicle V₂. Therefore, the candidate target acceleration cta₂is determined by the nominal control unit 16 at 128₂as the outcome of the method 100₂to correspond to

cta
₂
=a
₀(τ=0)+∫_τ^τ+Δtj_comfort(τ)dτ.

For the preceding vehicle V₃, the exclusion condition check at 108₃is positive, for which no candidate target acceleration is determined (cf. 204₃in FIG. 9).

For the preceding vehicle V₄, the distance control module 20 determines at 110₄that the corresponding safety distance sd₄would be violated in the course of the current predefined time interval Δt, for which, in order to avoid that, the candidate target acceleration cta₄is determined by the distance control module 20 at 114₄as the outcome of the method 100₄to correspond to

cta
₄
=a
₀(τ=0)+∫_τ^τ+Δtj_brake(τ)dτ.

The outcomes of the methods 100_icarried out for each of the preceding vehicles V₁, V₂, V₃and V₄are determined (cf. 204₁, 204₂, 204₃, 204₄in FIG. 9) and transmitted to the selection module 22 at 206, which selects as the target acceleration a_targetthe minimal candidate target acceleration, i.e. the smallest of values of cta₁, cta₂and cta₄min(cta₁, cta₂, cta₄).

In the example under consideration, assuming for example cta₁<cta₂<cta₄, the selection module 22 selects, at 206, cta₁as the target acceleration a_target.

The ACC system 10 then transmits, at 208, the value a_target=cta₁to the vehicle trajectory control system 40 for being implemented as the new acceleration of the vehicle V_obefore returning to steps 202_ito restart the iteration loop. As a consequence, the vehicle reacts to the current traffic situation with respect to the preceding vehicles V₁, V₂, V₃and V₄with the best possible balance between safety and comfort.

Notably, if an ICS had been determined by the ICS control unit 17 for any of the preceding vehicles V₁, V₂, V₃and V₄at the corresponding 120_i, the respective cta_iwould have corresponded to the minimal possible acceleration of the vehicle a_o^min, for which the outcome of the selection at 206 would have delivered a_o^minas an output and the vehicle trajectory control system 40 would have initiated at 208 a full braking manoeuvre of the vehicle V_o.

Although preferred exemplary embodiments are shown and specified in detail in the drawings and the preceding specification, these should be viewed as purely exemplary and not as limiting the invention. It is noted in this regard that only the preferred exemplary embodiments are shown and specified, and all variations and modifications should be protected that presently or in the future lie within the scope of protection of the invention as defined in the claims.

Claims

1-29. (canceled)
30. An adaptive cruise control (ACC) system for a vehicle comprising: a detection module configured for detecting one or more preceding vehicles driving ahead of the vehicle and for determining a respective velocity and a respective distance of each of the detected preceding vehicles with respect to the vehicle wherein the detection module is further configured for determining whether each of the determined distances is smaller than a respective safety distance; anda safety module connected to the detection module wherein the safety module is configured for determining, for each preceding vehicle of at least a part of the one or more detected preceding vehicles for which the determined distance is smaller than the respective safety distance, a respective candidate target acceleration of the vehicle wherein the safety module comprises:an inevitable collision state (ICS) control unit configured for determining whether the vehicle is or will be in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle wherein the inevitable collision state corresponds to a state of the vehicle in which a collision with the corresponding preceding vehicle is inevitable regardless of a modification of an acceleration of the vehicle wherein the ICS control unit is further configured for determining the respective candidate target acceleration corresponding to a minimal possible acceleration of the vehicle when the ICS control unit determines that the vehicle is in an inevitable collision state; andan emergency control unit configured for determining the candidate target acceleration when the ICS control unit determines that the vehicle is not in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle according to an emergency acceleration modification scheme, wherein the emergency acceleration modification scheme is defined for achieving the respective safety distance within a predefined time and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below a first predefined acceleration lower limit.
31. The ACC system of claim 30, wherein the safety module further comprises: a nominal control unit configured for determining, when the ICS control unit determines that the vehicle is not in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle whether the respective safety distance can be achieved by modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to a comfort acceleration modification scheme, wherein the comfort acceleration modification scheme is defined for achieving the respective safety distance within the predefined time and without a time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle falling below a predefined acceleration derivative lower limit and/or without an acceleration of the vehicle falling below a second predefined acceleration lower limit, wherein the comfort acceleration modification scheme is different from the emergency acceleration modification scheme, wherein the nominal control unit is further configured for determining the respective candidate target acceleration according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme when the nominal control unit determines that the respective safety distance can be achieved by modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme; andwherein the emergency control unit is further configured for determining the candidate target acceleration according to the emergency acceleration modification scheme when the nominal control unit determines that the respective safety distance cannot be achieved by modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme and the ICS control unit determines that the vehicle is not in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle.
32. The ACC system of claim 31, wherein the nominal control unit is configured for determining whether the respective safety distance can be achieved according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme assuming that the corresponding preceding vehicle moves at a constant velocity corresponding to the determined respective velocity.
33. The ACC system of claim 31, wherein the emergency control unit is further configured for determining, based on the respective distance and the respective velocity: an emergency jerk profile defining a time evolution of the time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle allowing to achieve the respective safety distance within the predefined time and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the first predefined acceleration lower limit; and/oran emergency acceleration profile defining a time evolution of the acceleration of the vehicle allowing to achieve the respective safety distance within the predefined time and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the first predefined acceleration lower limit; andwherein the emergency control unit is configured for determining the respective candidate target acceleration according to the emergency jerk profile and/or to the emergency acceleration profile.
34. The ACC system of claim 33, wherein the nominal control unit is further configured for, when the nominal control unit determines that the respective safety distance can be achieved by modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme, determining, based on the respective distance and the respective velocity determined for the corresponding preceding vehicle: a comfort jerk profile defining a time evolution of the time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle allowing to achieve the respective safety distance within the predefined time without a time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the predefined acceleration derivative lower limit and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the second predefined acceleration lower limit; and/ora comfort acceleration profile defining a time evolution of the acceleration of the vehicle allowing to achieve the respective safety distance within the predefined time without a time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the predefined acceleration derivative lower limit and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the second predefined acceleration lower limit; andwherein the nominal control unit is configured for determining the respective candidate target acceleration according to the comfort jerk profile and/or the comfort acceleration profile.
35. The ACC system of claim 34, wherein the emergency control unit is configured for determining said emergency jerk profile and/or said emergency acceleration profile when the nominal control unit determines that the respective safety distance cannot be achieved by modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme and/or when the ICS control unit determines that the vehicle is not in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle.
36. The ACC system of claim 30, wherein the ICS control unit is configured for determining whether the vehicle is in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle assuming a predetermined safety acceleration for the corresponding preceding vehicle.
37. The ACC system of claim 31, wherein determining the respective candidate target acceleration according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme by the nominal control unit comprises determining the respective candidate acceleration as a first acceleration value; and wherein determining the respective candidate target acceleration according to the emergency acceleration modification scheme by the emergency control unit comprises determining the respective candidate acceleration as a second acceleration value;wherein the first acceleration value is greater than the second acceleration value.
38. The ACC system of claim 31, wherein a minimal value of the acceleration of the vehicle or the time derivative thereof according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme is greater than a minimal value of the acceleration of the vehicle or the time derivative thereof according to the emergency acceleration modification scheme.
39. The ACC system of claim 30, further comprising a distance control module connected with the detection module and configured for, for each of at least a part of the one or more preceding vehicles for which the determined respective distance equals or exceeds the respective safety distance, determining whether the vehicle is in a potential collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle wherein the potential collision state corresponds to a state of the vehicle in which when the corresponding preceding vehicle initiates a full braking manoeuvre, a distance between the vehicle and the corresponding preceding vehicle will become smaller than the respective safety distance within a predefined time interval unless the acceleration of the vehicle is modified; wherein, when the distance control module determines that the vehicle is in a potential collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle the distance control module is further configured for:determining the corresponding candidate target acceleration according to a predetermined distance control acceleration modification scheme.
40. The ACC system of claim 30, wherein said at least a part of the one or more detected preceding vehicles for which the determined distance is smaller than the respective safety distance and/or said at least a part of the one or more preceding vehicles for which the determined distance equals or exceeds the respective safety distance comprises preceding vehicles for which an exclusion condition is not fulfilled, wherein the exclusion condition is fulfilled for a given preceding vehicle when another preceding vehicle exists for which the determined distance and the determined velocity are respectively smaller than the distance and velocity determined for said given preceding vehicle; and/ora difference between the distance determined for said given preceding vehicle and a stopping distance of the vehicle is equal to or greater than zero or a security margin, wherein the stopping distance of the vehicle corresponds to a minimal distance covered by the vehicle until the vehicle comes to a zero-velocity state, in particular according to a predefined braking acceleration modification scheme.
41. The ACC system of claim 39, further comprising a selection module configured for selecting, among all candidate target accelerations determined by the safety module or the distance control module a minimal candidate target acceleration, wherein the minimal candidate target acceleration is smaller than all other candidate target accelerations.
42. The ACC system of claim 30, wherein the respective safety distance corresponds to a distance between the vehicle and the corresponding preceding vehicle over which the vehicle can stop without a collision with the corresponding preceding vehicle in case of a full braking of the corresponding preceding vehicle.
43. The ACC system of claim 30, further comprising a velocity control module connected with the detection module and configured for determining a target velocity of the vehicle configured for not exceeding a detection range velocity, wherein the detection range velocity is a maximal velocity from which the vehicle can transition to a zero-velocity state over a detection range distance, wherein the detection range distance is the maximum distance from the vehicle at which a preceding vehicle can be detected by the detection module in particular from a state of maximal acceleration of the vehicle and/or according to a predefined braking acceleration modification scheme.
44. A vehicle comprising: a vehicle trajectory control system configured for controlling an acceleration and/or a velocity of the vehicle; andan adaptive cruise control (ACC) system comprising:a detection module configured for detecting one or more preceding vehicles driving ahead of the vehicle and for determining a respective velocity and a respective distance of each of the detected preceding vehicles with respect to the vehicle wherein the detection module is further configured for determining whether each of the determined distances is smaller than a respective safety distance; anda safety module connected to the detection module wherein the safety module is configured for determining, for each preceding vehicle of at least a part of the one or more detected preceding vehicles for which the determined distance is smaller than the respective safety distance, a respective candidate target acceleration of the vehicle wherein the safety module comprises:an inevitable collision state (ICS) control unit configured for determining whether the vehicle is or will be in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle wherein the inevitable collision state corresponds to a state of the vehicle in which a collision with the corresponding preceding vehicle is inevitable regardless of a modification of an acceleration of the vehicle wherein the ICS control unit is further configured for determining the respective candidate target acceleration corresponding to a minimal possible acceleration of the vehicle when the ICS control unit determines that the vehicle is in an inevitable collision state; andan emergency control unit configured for determining the candidate target acceleration when the ICS control unit determines that the vehicle is not in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle according to an emergency acceleration modification scheme, wherein the emergency acceleration modification scheme is defined for achieving the respective safety distance within a predefined time and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below a first predefined acceleration lower limit,wherein the vehicle trajectory control system is configured for controlling the acceleration and/or the velocity of the vehicle according to a target velocity and/or to a candidate target acceleration determined by the ACC system.
45. A method of determining a target acceleration of a vehicle, the method comprising: detecting one or more preceding vehicles driving ahead of the vehicle;determining a velocity and a distance of each of the one or more detected preceding vehicles with respect to the vehicle; anddetermining the target acceleration by determining for each preceding vehicle of at least a part of the one or more detected preceding vehicles, a respective candidate target acceleration of the vehicle and by selecting as the target acceleration the minimal candidate target acceleration, wherein determining the corresponding candidate target acceleration for a corresponding preceding vehicle comprises in each case:determining whether the corresponding determined distance is smaller than a respective safety distance, and, when the corresponding determined distance is smaller than the respective safety distance:determining whether the vehicle is or will be in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle wherein the inevitable collision state corresponds to a state of the vehicle in which a collision with the corresponding preceding vehicle is inevitable regardless of a modification of an acceleration of the vehicle and when the vehicle is in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle determining the corresponding candidate target acceleration as a minimal possible acceleration of the vehicle; andif the vehicle is not in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle determining the corresponding candidate target acceleration according to an emergency acceleration modification scheme, wherein the emergency acceleration modification scheme is defined for achieving the respective safety distance within a predefined time and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below a first predefined acceleration lower limit.
46. The method of claim 45, wherein when the corresponding determined distance is smaller than the respective safety distance and the vehicle is not in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle determining the corresponding candidate target acceleration for a corresponding preceding vehicle further comprises: determining whether it is feasible to achieve the respective safety distance by modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to a comfort acceleration modification scheme, wherein the comfort acceleration modification scheme is defined for achieving the respective safety distance within a predefined time and/or without a time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle falling below a predefined acceleration derivative lower limit and/or without an acceleration of the vehicle falling below a second predefined acceleration lower limit, andif it is feasible to achieve the respective safety distance according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme, determining the corresponding candidate target acceleration according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme; and wherein the corresponding candidate target acceleration is determined according to the emergency acceleration modification scheme when the vehicle is not in an inevitable collision state with respect to the corresponding preceding vehicle and it is not feasible to achieve the respective safety distance according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme.
47. The method of claim 46, wherein determining whether it is feasible to achieve the respective safety distance by modifying the acceleration of the vehicle according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme comprises assuming that the corresponding preceding vehicle moves at a constant velocity, corresponding to the determined respective velocity.
48. The method of claim 45, wherein determining the corresponding candidate target acceleration (ctai) according to the emergency acceleration modification scheme comprises determining (130i), based on the respective distance (di) and the respective velocity (vi) determined for the corresponding preceding vehicle (Vi): an emergency jerk profile (jemergency(t)) defining a time evolution of the time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle allowing to achieve the respective safety distance (sdi) within the predefined time (tc) and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the first predefined acceleration lower limit; and/oran emergency acceleration profile (aemergency(t)) defining a time evolution of the acceleration of the vehicle allowing to achieve the respective safety distance (sdi) within the predefined time (tc) and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the first predefined acceleration lower limit; andwherein the respective candidate target acceleration (ctai) for the corresponding preceding vehicle (Vi) is determined according to the emergency jerk profile (jemergency(t)) and/or to the emergency acceleration profile (aemergency(t)).
49. The method of claim 46, wherein determining the corresponding candidate target acceleration according to the comfort acceleration modification scheme comprises determining based on the respective distance and the respective velocity determined for the corresponding preceding vehicle: a comfort jerk profile defining a time evolution of the time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle allowing to achieve the respective safety distance within the predefined time without a time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the predefined acceleration derivative lower limit and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the second predefined acceleration lower limit; and/ora comfort acceleration profile defining a time evolution of the acceleration of the vehicle allowing to achieve the respective safety distance within the predefined time without a time derivative of the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the predefined acceleration derivative lower limit and/or without the acceleration of the vehicle falling below the second predefined acceleration lower limit; andwherein the respective candidate target acceleration for the corresponding preceding vehicle is determined according to the comfort jerk profile and/or the comfort acceleration profile.

Priority Claims (3)

Number	Date	Country	Kind
20169720.8	Apr 2020	EP	regional
20169992.3	Apr 2020	EP	regional
20172447.3	Apr 2020	EP	regional

PCT Information

Filing Document	Filing Date	Country	Kind
PCT/EP2021/056304	3/12/2021	WO

CUT-IN-SAFE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL SYSTEM FOR VEHICLES

Information

Publication Number

Date Filed

Date Published

Inventors

Original Assignees

CPC

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Priority Claims (3)

PCT Information