1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a lightweight protective fabric that is cut, slash and/or abrasion resistant, and garments made therefrom.
2. Discussion of the Background
In many industries and professions there is a need for protective wear that is cut and/or abrasion resistant, yet lightweight and comfortable for the wearer. From maintenance workers crawling through HVAC ventilation shafts to weekend warriors participating in various sporting events, many individuals need protection from cuts and scrapes as they go about their daily activities.
Typical examples of previous garments and modular systems are disclosed in U.S. Publication No. 2004/0199983 to Gillen; U.S. Pat. No. 6,892,392 to Crye; U.S. Pat. No. 6,698,024 to Graves; U.S. Pat. No. 6,263,509 to Bowen; U.S. Pat. No. 6,185,745 to Alger; U.S. Pat. No. 6,182,288 to Kibbee; U.S. Pat. No. 6,158,056 to Riley; U.S. Pat. No. 6,029,270 to Ost; U.S. Pat. No. 5,894,600 to Chenefront; U.S. Pat. No. 5,754,982 to Gainer; U.S. Pat. No. 5,718,000 to Ost; U.S. Pat. No. 5,717,999 to Lurry; U.S. Pat. No. 5,673,836 to Bush; U.S. Pat. No. 5,584,737 to Luhtala; U.S. Pat. No. 5,495,621 to Kibbee; U.S. Pat. No. 5,072,453 to Widder; U.S. Pat. No. 5,060,314 to Lewis; U.S. Pat. No. 4,497,069 to Braunhut; and U.S. Pat. No. 4,467,476 to Herbert, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
However, these and other known such garments suffer from numerous disadvantages. The garments are often unable to provide a satisfactory level of protection to a wearer of the garment, are easily damaged, are unwieldy and uncomfortable to the wearer, do not permit airflow therethrough, do not permit the escape of excess water vapor from the skin of the wearer, and often require the use of specialized over- or undergarments. Most of the modular systems in these patents require a central vest portion to be present in order to attach the other parts of the system.
An additional difficulty in preparing cut, slash and abrasion resistant fabrics and garments, is that in order to achieve sufficient cut and slash protection using high-performance fibers, the garments typically end up being too bulky, too heavy, and are difficult to put together, as the fabric cannot be readily cut to necessary size and shape without taking a high toll on the cutting apparatus.
Thus there is a need for a fabric that is cut, slash and/or abrasion resistant, while remaining lightweight. There is also a need for a method for preparing garments or coverings from such fabrics and the garments and coverings made therefrom.
It is an object of the present invention to overcome these or other disadvantages of known cut, slash and/or abrasion resistant fabrics.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a method to prepare a cut, slash and/or abrasion resistant garment or covering that is able to provide a satisfactory level of cut, slash and/or abrasion resistance protection to the wearer, able to resist damage, is light-weight, comfortable, able to permit airflow therethrough, able to permit the escape of excess water vapor from the skin of the wearer, able to be worn directly against the skin as an undergarment, and able to be worn under street clothes or a uniform without the use of specialized over- or undergarments.
These and other objects of the present invention can be provided by a shaped knit fabric panel, comprising at least one cut, slash and/or abrasion resistant yarn, wherein the shaped knit fabric panel has a cut resistance of at least 500 (as measured by ASTM-F1790-04) and a fabric weight of no more than 27.9 ounces/square yard (OPSY), and the use of one or more shaped knit fabric panels to prepare a garment or covering that provides the same cut resistance and lightweight comfort.
A more complete appreciation of the present invention, and many of the attendant advantages thereof, will be readily ascertained and obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The term “fiber” as used herein refers to a fundamental component used in the assembly of yarns and fabrics. Generally, a fiber is a component which has a length dimension which is much greater than its diameter or width. This term includes ribbon, strip, staple, and other forms of chopped, cut or discontinuous fiber and the like having a regular or irregular cross section. “Fiber” also includes a plurality of any one of the above or a combination of the above.
As used herein, the term “high performance fiber” means that class of synthetic or natural non-glass fibers having high values of tenacity greater than 10 g/denier, such that they lend themselves for applications where high abrasion and/or cut resistance is important. Typically, high performance fibers have a very high degree of molecular orientation and crystallinity in the final fiber structure.
The term “filament” as used herein refers to a fiber of indefinite or extreme length such as found naturally in silk. This term also refers to manufactured fibers produced by, among other things, extrusion processes. Individual filaments making up a fiber may have any one of a variety of cross sections to include round, serrated or crenular, bean-shaped or others.
The term “yarn” as used herein refers to a continuous strand of textile fibers, filaments or material in a form suitable for knitting, weaving, or otherwise intertwining to form a textile fabric. Yarn can occur in a variety of forms to include a spun yarn consisting of staple fibers usually bound together by twist; a multi filament yarn consisting of many continuous filaments or strands; or a mono filament yarn which consist of a single strand.
The term “composite yarn” (or “engineered yarn”) refers to a yarn prepared from two or more yarns (or “ends”), which can be the same or different. Composite yarn can occur in a variety of forms wherein the two or more ends are in differing orientations relative to one another, so long as the final composite yarn containing the two or more ends is stably assembled (i.e. will remain intact unless forcibly separated or disassembled). The two or more ends can, for example, be parallel, wrapped one around the other(s), twisted together, or combinations of any or all of these, as well as other orientations, depending on the properties of the composite yarn desired. Suitable composite yarns, which may be formed into fabric by any desired process, preferably knit or woven into the fabric, include, but are not limited to, those as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,777,789, 4,838,017, 4,936,085, 5,177,948, 5,628,172, 5,632,137, 5,644,907, 5,655,358, 5,845,476, 6,212,914, 6,230,524, 6,341,483, 6,349,531, 6,363,703, 6,367,290, and 6,381,940, each to Kolmes, the contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Another term by which composite yarns are known is “engineered yarn”.
The present invention relates to a shaped knit protective fabric panel having a cut resistance of at least 500, according to the ASTM-F1790-04 (Standard Cut Test on Composite Yarn), and a fabric weight of 27.9 ounces/sq. yd or less, and protective garments and coverings made therefrom.
The fabric panel of the present invention comprises sufficient cut, slash and/or abrasion resistant yarn to provide the fabric with the necessary level of cut resistance, such that the fabric has a cut resistance of at least 500 as measured by ASTM-F1790-04, the Standard Cut Test on Composite Yarn, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. These cut, slash and/or abrasion resistant yarns can be any high performance yarn, a composite yarn, a yarn blend comprising one or more high performance or composite yarns, etc. Suitable high-performance yarns include, but are not limited to, extended chain polyethylene (such as SPECTRA or DYNEEMA), aramids (such as KEVLAR), and liquid crystalline polyesters (such as VECTRAN). The fabric preferably has a cut resistance of from 500 to 6200, more preferably from 1000 to 6200. The fabric preferably may contain one or more composite yarns, either alone or in combination with any other natural or synthetic fiber. Such natural or synthetic fibers include, but are not limited to, cotton, wool, nylon, polyester, rayon, cellulose acetate, etc.
The fabric of the present invention further has a fabric weight that is sufficiently lightweight to be practical for wearing, having a fabric weight of no more than 27.9 ounces/square yard (OPSY), preferably a fabric weight of from 7 to 27.9 OPSY, more preferably from 8 to 20 OPSY, most preferably from 8 to 17 OPSY.
The protective garments of the present invention are made from the protective fabric and can be any form of garment, including, but not limited to, shirts, socks, sweaters, vests, undergarments, pants, jumpsuits, dickeys, and head coverings. The protective garment of the present invention can provide one or more of the following advantages, including the prevention or reduction of injury to the wearer, resistance to damage, and light-weight construction. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the protective garment comprises a fabric made entirely from cut, slash and/or abrasion resistant composite yarns. The garments are made according to any known method useful for preparing garments from fabrics. Preferably, the garments are made by shaped knitting during preparation of the fabric. Shaped knitting is a process by which the various panels of a garment are formed directly in the shape needed for assembly, during the knitting process. This is preferred for the present invention, since the fabrics of the present invention have cut and slash resistance and are therefore extremely difficult to cut using conventional fabric cutting means. While it is possible to cut the fabric, the cutting process is very hard on the cutting surfaces, significantly reducing the interval between servicing of the cutting equipment, and thus increasing the cost of operations. Accordingly, shaped knitting is preferably used to prepare the panels of fabric which are assembled to prepare the present invention garments. These panels are then linked together to form the garment. Many types of seam construction can be used to attach panels to one another. Since these panels have been shaped during their construction, linking, looping of collars or cup seaming are the most preferred, due to the higher comfort provided by the seam against the wearer's skin as well as strength. The Knit Construction may be in various Gauges such as 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, and 18 gauges wherein within the context of the present invention, the term “gauge” means needles per inch on the specific machine on which the pieces are knit. By way of example, 18 Gauge would normally make a fine textured piece, whereas a 3 gauge piece would normally be of a coarser texture.
In a preferred embodiment, the fabric is prepared into a garment or other type of covering that is seamless. Such garments or coverings can be prepared using a knitting machine such as the “WholeGarment” machine sold by Shima Seiki Mfg., Ltd. of Wakayarna, Japan, or the “Stoll Knit-and-Wear” machinery of H. Stoll & Co. Kg. of Reutlingen, Germany. These garments or coverings could have any desired construction, but would typically be substantially tubular knit in construction, although the tubular construction could have apertures through which appendages could protrude when wearing the garment, or when the covering is applied to an object. The coverings made from the present invention fabrics could be any type of covering, including but not limited to, book covers, wiring protection, sacks, and scuba air hose covers (or socks).
As exemplary embodiments, fabrics are made from the following types of yarns:
YARN 1:
Core: Fiberglass #450
Bottom cover: 215 denier SPECTRA wrapped at 9.7 turns per inch (tpi)
Middle cover: 70 denier polyester (PET) wrapped at 18.5 tpi
Top cover: 70 denier polyester (PET) wrapped at 16.3 tpi
YARN 2:
Core 1: Spun polyester 36/1 combined with
Core 2: Fiberglass #225 wrapped by 0.002 in wire at 9.9 tpi, followed by a top cover of 375 denier SPECTRA at 7.8 tpi
Bottom cover: 150 denier Polyester (PET) wrapped at 7.5 tpi
Top cover: Spun polyester 36/1 wrapped at 5 tpi
YARN 3:
Core 1: 650 denier SPECTRA
Core 2: 3 parallel strands of wire of 0.0035, 0.003 and 0.003 in
Cores 1 and 2 being parallel in orientation
Bottom cover: 1000 denier polyester (PET) wrapped at 9.9 tpi
Top cover: 1000 denier polyester (PET) wrapped at 8.0 tpi
YARN 4:
Core: 70 denier LYCRA T-162C (from DuPont)
Cover: 375 denier SPECTRA wrapped at 7.8 tpi
The resulting fabrics have the cut resistances (measured according to ASTM-F1790-04) and fabric weights shown below:
As an example of a garment prepared according to the present invention,
Numerous additional modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the present invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3078699 | Huntley | Feb 1963 | A |
4055201 | Fowler et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4143197 | Jasionowicz et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4384449 | Byrnes et al. | May 1983 | A |
4467476 | Herbert | Aug 1984 | A |
4470251 | Bettcher | Sep 1984 | A |
4497069 | Braunhut | Feb 1985 | A |
4777789 | Kolmes et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4825470 | Horio | May 1989 | A |
4838017 | Kolmes et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4856110 | Giesick | Aug 1989 | A |
4936085 | Kolmes et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5060314 | Lewis | Oct 1991 | A |
5072453 | Widder | Dec 1991 | A |
5119512 | Dunbar et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5177948 | Kolmes et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5382264 | Sharma | Jan 1995 | A |
5423168 | Kolmes et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5442815 | Cordova et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5495621 | Kibbee | Mar 1996 | A |
5500025 | Sharma | Mar 1996 | A |
5584737 | Luhtala | Dec 1996 | A |
5628172 | Kolmes et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632137 | Kolmes et al. | May 1997 | A |
5644907 | Kolmes et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5655358 | Kolmes | Aug 1997 | A |
5673836 | Bush | Oct 1997 | A |
5717999 | Lurry | Feb 1998 | A |
5718000 | Ost et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5754982 | Gainer | May 1998 | A |
5845476 | Kolmes | Dec 1998 | A |
5858054 | Rosen | Jan 1999 | A |
5894600 | Chenefront | Apr 1999 | A |
5965223 | Andrews et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6029270 | Ost et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6155084 | Andrews et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6158056 | Riley | Dec 2000 | A |
6182288 | Kibbee | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185745 | Alger | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6212914 | Kolmes et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230524 | Kolmes et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6263509 | Bowen | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6341483 | Kolmes et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6349531 | Kolmes et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351932 | Hummel | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363703 | Kolmes | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6367290 | Kolmes et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6381940 | Kolmes et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6467251 | Kolmes | Oct 2002 | B1 |
RE38136 | Kolmes | Jun 2003 | E |
6698024 | Graves et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6892392 | Crye et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6918241 | Zhu | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7111445 | Threlkeld et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7121077 | Andrews et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7178323 | Kolmes et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7214425 | Kolmes et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
20050086924 | Kolmes | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050186259 | Threlkeld et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060088712 | Threlkeld et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070094761 | Kolmes et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070099528 | Kolmes et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070137164 | Kolmes et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070144135 | Kolmes et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
62-299590 | Dec 1987 | JP |
63-254030 | Oct 1988 | JP |
6-65830 | Mar 1994 | JP |
2002-54042 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002-266118 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003-147651 | May 2003 | JP |
2003-306817 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2006-169656 | Jun 2006 | JP |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,834, filed Sep. 9, 2008, Schulein, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,218, filed Aug. 10, 2009, Schulein, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/551,736, filed Sep. 1, 2009, Kolmes, et al. |
Office Action dated May 22, 2012, in Japanese Patent Application No. 20090512232, filed May 18, 2007 w/English-language translation. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/023,977, filed Sep. 11, 2013, Kolmes, et al. |
Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2013 in Canadian Patent Application No. CA20072647443, filed May 18, 2007. |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Nov. 3, 2014 in European Patent Application No. 07797580.3, filed May 18, 2007. |
Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2015 in Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2008/014871. |
Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2017 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-226815, filed Nov. 19, 2015 w/English translation. |
Office Action dated Nov. 13, 2018, in European Patent Application No. 20070797580, filed May 18, 2007. |
Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2018, in European Patent Application No. 20070797580, filed May 18, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/972,332, filed Oct. 26, 2004, U.S. Pat. No. 2006/0088712 A1, Threlkeld, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,971, filed Oct. 8, 2003, US2005/0086924 A1, Kolmes. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/785,060, filed Feb. 25, 2004, US2005/0186259 A1, Threlkeld, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/730,829, filed Oct. 28, 2005, Kolmes. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/251,928, filed Oct. 18, 2005, US2007/00994761 A1, Kolmes, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/263,851, filed Nov. 2, 2005, US2007/0099528 A1, Kolmes, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/589,210, filed Oct. 30, 2006, US2007/0144135 A1, Kolmes, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/679,341, filed Feb. 27, 2007, US2007/0137164 A1, Kolmes, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/778,340, filed Jul. 16, 2007, Schulein. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/020,790, filed Jan. 14, 2008, Kolmes, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/134,446, dated Jun. 6, 2008, Kolmes, et al. |
Japanese Office Action issued Jan. 14, 2020 in Japanese Application No. 2018-242345, filed Dec. 26, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070271965 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |