Patent Grant
11339657
The present invention relates to underground mining machines, and in particular to a cutter head for an underground mining machine.
A hard rock continuous miner includes a cutter head having an oscillating cutting disc. The oscillating disc cutter transmits all of the dynamic cutting forces through the bearings, and the life of the bearings are limited due to the high loads and high speed of the cutting discs. In addition, the oscillating discs require large face seal surface areas in the primary cutting area, while the cutting discs oscillate at frequencies typically around 50 Hz. It is difficult to seal a large area with a high surface velocity, and this is further complicated due to the fact that the cutting operation generates a large amount of highly abrasive rock particles. The combination of the contaminated environment and high surface velocity accelerates wear on the seals and decreases the working life of the seals. Furthermore, the deficiencies in the seals and the highly loaded bearings can combine to even further increase maintenance and replacement of the disc cutter assembly. These factors also limit the frequency and the eccentricity of oscillation of the cutting discs, thereby limiting the total power available for rock cutting
In addition, oscillating disc cutter systems typically lack a means for directly monitoring the behavior of the disc cutter at the cutting surface. As a result, it is difficult to sense a change in the cutting conditions (e.g., when the hardness of the rock changes). Thus, the operator is unable to control the disc cutter to optimize the cutting performance.
In some aspects the invention provides a cutter head for a mining machine including a frame and a boom movably coupled to the frame. The cutter head includes a first member, a cutting bit, and a second member. The first member includes a first end and a second end and includes a first mass. The cutting bit is coupled to the first member proximate the second end and includes a cutting edge. The second member is rotatable about an axis and includes a second mass eccentrically positioned with respect to the axis. The second mass and the first mass at least partially define a combined center of mass. Rotation of the second mass causes the first member and the cutting bit to oscillate about the combined center of mass along a closed path.
In other aspects the invention provides a mining machine including a frame for supporting the machine on a support surface, a boom, and a cutter head. The boom includes a first end coupled to the frame and a second end positioned away from the frame. The cutter head a cutter head coupled to the second end of the boom, the cutter head includes a first member, a cutting bit, and a second member. The first member defines a first end and a second end and includes a first mass and a coupling member supporting the first mass on the second end of the boom. The cutting bit is coupled to the first member proximate the second end and includes a cutting edge. The first member and the cutting bit at least partially define a first mass center. The second member is rotatable about an axis and includes a second mass eccentrically positioned with respect to the axis. The second mass defines a second mass center. The first mass center and the second mass center define a combined center of mass. Rotation of the second mass about the axis causing the first member and the cutting bit to oscillate about the combined center of mass along a closed path.
In still other aspects the invention provides a mining machine including a frame for supporting the machine on a support surface, a boom, a cutter head, and a coupling member. The boom includes a first end coupled to the frame and a second end positioned away from the frame; the second end includes a bracket. The cutter head includes a first member and a cutting bit. The first member includes a first end coupled to the bracket and a second end. The cutting bit is coupled to the first member proximate the second end. The coupling member supporting the first member on the second end of the boom to facilitate oscillation of the cutter head relative to the boom.
In still other aspects the invention provides a cutter head for a mining machine including a frame and a boom movably coupled to the frame. The cutter head includes a first member, a cutting bit, a fluid conduit, and a plurality of nozzles. The first member includes a first end and a second end and is movable relative to the second end. The cutting bit is coupled to the first member proximate the second end. The fluid conduit extends through the first member and is configured to be in fluid communication with a fluid source. The nozzles are positioned on the cutting edge, the nozzles in fluid communication with the fluid conduit.
In still other aspects, the invention provides a method for removing material from a rock wall. The method includes moving a cutting edge through the rock wall to create a first slot in the rock wall; moving the cutting edge through the rock wall to create a second slot in the rock wall, the second slot being separated from the first slot by an uncut portion, the uncut portion defining a base surface attached to the wall; cutting a notch into the base surface of the uncut portion; and applying a force on the uncut portion to break the uncut portion away from the wall.
In still other aspects, the invention provides a method for controlling a mining machine. The method includes sensing a value of an indicator of a cutting efficiency of a cutter head; comparing the sensed value with a desired value; modifying an operating parameter in a first direction from an initial value to a second value; detecting the change in the indicator of cutting efficiency; and when the change in the indicator of the cutting efficiency represents an improvement, modifying the operating parameter further in the first direction to a third value.
In still other aspects, the invention provides a method for controlling a mining machine. The method includes sensing a first value of an indicator of a cutting efficiency of a first cutter; sensing a second value of an indicator of cutting efficiency of a second cutter; comparing the first value with the second value to detect whether the first value is less than the second value; when the first value is less than the second value, modifying an operating parameter of the second cutter so that the second value matches the first value.
Other aspects of the invention will become apparent by consideration of the detailed description and accompanying drawings.
Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising” or “having” and variations thereof herein is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items. The terms “mounted,” “connected” and “coupled” are used broadly and encompass both direct and indirect mounting, connecting and coupling. Further, “connected” and “coupled” are not restricted to physical or mechanical connections or couplings, and can include electrical or hydraulic connections or couplings, whether direct or indirect. Also, electronic communications and notifications may be performed using any known means including direct connections, wireless connections, etc.
As shown in
The boom 18 is pivotably coupled to the frame 14 at one end, and operation of one or more first actuators 46 pivot, extend, and retract the boom 18 relative to the frame 14. In the illustrated embodiment, the first actuators 46 are hydraulic cylinders. Also, in the illustrated embodiment, the boom 18 pivotably supports the cutter head 22 on an end of the boom 18 opposite the frame 14. A second actuator 50 (
As shown in
In other embodiments, a different type of cutter head (including a cutter head having a conventional oscillating disc cutter) may be coupled to the arm 60 by the pins 74 and springs 78. In still other embodiments, a plate spring or hinge is coupled between the support plate 70 and the boom 18. The plate spring is made from a fatigue-resistant material such as a carbon-fiber composite. The plate spring eliminates the need for mechanical pivots and reduces wear on the coupling, thereby improving the working life.
The cutter head 22 is shown in
In the embodiment of
The tapered shape provides clearance for the cutting bit 86 to engage the mine wall 26 while still permitting the boom 18 to position the cutter head 22 and produce an optimum cutting profile. The position and shape of the inertial member 90 are inter-related design factors, and the tapered shape allows a minimum amount of mass to provide a relatively high “equivalent” mass or moment of inertia. In addition, the tapered shape facilitates cutting along tight corners and performing cut-and-break mining as described in more detail below. It is understood that the cutter head 22 could be used for cutting a mine wall according to other methods (i.e., the cutter head 22 is not limited to cut-and-break mining methods). In general, the tapered shape provides a versatile cutter head 22 that permits a variety of cutting profiles while positioning the inertial member 90 as close to the cutting bit 86 as practicable to improve the efficiency of the cutting operation.
In other embodiments, the inertial member 90 may have a different shape or position, depending on the tunnel dimensions, the geometry of the boom, and the optimum effective mass. The inertial member 90 may include other configurations, such as a rotating overhung mass 142 (illustrated in
Referring to
The exciter member 94 is rotated by the first motor 102, and the rotation of the exciter member 94 “excites” the inertial member 90 and the connected cutting bit 86 and induces a desired oscillation in the inertial member 90 and cutting bit 86. As shown in
More specifically, the dimension of the path 148 is proportional to the mass of the exciter member 94 and the eccentricity (i.e., axial offset) of the exciter member 94. The dimension is also inversely proportional to the mass of the inertial member 90. For example, in one embodiment the inertial member 90 has an effective mass of 1000 kg at the cutter, while the exciter member 94 has an effective eccentric mass of 40 kg at the cutter and an eccentricity (i.e., an amplitude of eccentric oscillation) of 50 mm. The resultant oscillation of the inertial member 90 is proportional to the product of the mass and eccentricity of the exciter member 94 divided by the mass of the inertial member 90; therefore the excitation causes the inertial member of 1000 kg to oscillate or vibrate with an amplitude of ±2 mm (i.e., the radius of the path 148 of the cutting bit 86 is 2 mm). In other embodiments, the relative masses of the inertial member 90 and the exciter member 94 as well as the eccentricity of the exciter member 94 can be modified to produce a desired oscillation response in the inertial member 90.
When the cutting bit 86 contacts mine wall, the wall exerts a reaction force on the cutting bit 86 that resists the oscillating motion of the inertial member 90. To compensate, the feed force is exerted on the cutter head 22 by the boom 18 to urge the cutting bit 86 towards the wall. The oscillation of the inertial member 90 and the exciter member 94 is controlled so that the inertial member 90 has a maximum velocity in the direction of the cut when the cutting bit 86 engages the mine wall.
The cutter head 22 directly secures together the inertial member 90 and the cutting bit 86. Unlike conventional oscillating disc cutters in which all of the dynamic cutting forces are transmitted from a cutting bit and through a bearing arrangement into an inertial mass, the cutter head 22 provides a direct connection between the cutting bit 86 and the inertial member 90. This direct connection permits the inertial member 90 to absorb a significant amount of the dynamic cutting force before the load is transmitted to the bearings 110, 144, thereby reducing the load on the bearings 110, 144. In one embodiment, the high-speed bearing 144 is subject to approximately 5% of the total dynamic cutting forces. The bearings 110, 144 are also sealed from the rock cutting zone. Furthermore, the cutter head 22 eliminates dynamic seals in the primary rock cutting zone operating at high speed over large areas. As a result, it is possible to increase both the frequency and the eccentricity of cutter head 22 while also improving the working life of the cutter head 22. Therefore, the cutter head 22 improves the efficiency of the cutting operation. The increased frequency and eccentricity permit the cutting bit 86 to exert more dynamic power on the wall to break rock without requiring larger cutter components.
In one embodiment, the frequency (i.e., rotational speed) and the mass of the inertial member 90 as well as the feed force provided by the boom 18 are generally the same as that of a conventional oscillating disc cutter, but the mass and eccentric radius of the exciter member 94 are increased. The increased excitation increases inertial member 90 travel (i.e., oscillation amplitude) and results in greater impact energy for the rock cutting process. In one embodiment, the impact energy is three to four times more than the impact energy provided by a conventional oscillating disc cutter.
Alternatively, a smaller cutter head 22 can be used to generate the same cutting forces as a conventional cutter head, permitting a lower cost machine that can access and operate in tightly constrained areas of the underground mine. For example, in one embodiment, the inertial member 90 is sized with the same mass and oscillates at the same frequency as a conventional oscillating disc cutter, but only requires half of the feed force (i.e., the external force applied to the cutter head by the boom 18) to impart the same amount of energy into the rock.
As the cutter head 22 makes a final cutting pass through a slot 154, (e.g., as the cutter head 22 cuts the slot 154 to a desired depth), the protruding (i.e., uncut) rock sections 158 above and below the slot 154 are undercut and overcut, respectively, to a maximum allowable depth of the cutting bit 86. That is, a base of each side of the rock section 158 is notched to create a fracture line adjacent the mine wall 26 (
Unlike conventional methods that require cutting virtually all of the rock on the mine wall 26, the method described above permits the operator to selectively cut rock in such a way to maximize the potential for rock fracturing, and subsequently breaking uncut rock sections 158. Depending on the type of rock, the presence of shear planes, and the size of the mine wall 26, the “cut-and-break” method described above can mine the rock such that the ratio between the amount of rock that is broken from the wall 26 to the amount of rock that is cut from the wall 26 exceeds 1:1. That is, the method requires cutting less than half of the rock that is removed from the wall 26. The method substantially reduces cutting time and energy consumption, and also reduces the wear on the cutting bit 86 and other components of the cutter head 22. In some embodiments, the method described above more than doubles the productivity in underground entry development, when compared with conventional rock cutting processes.
In one embodiment, the cutting bit 86 has a diameter of 400 mm and cuts a slot 154 that is nominally 400 mm tall and 250 mm deep, leaving uncut protruding rock sections 158 that are 200 mm tall and 250 mm deep. The cutter velocity is approximately 100 mm per second and cuts a depth of 50 mm per pass. The mine wall 26 is generally about 5 m wide by 4.8 m tall. The protruding sections 158 are broken from the mine wall 26 as described above. The cutting method according to this embodiment requires cutting at least 25% less rock than conventional hard rock cutting methods. This configuration (i.e., a wide cutting bit diameter and narrower uncut rock sections 158) may be particularly useful for mining extremely hard, competent rock (i.e., rock into which unsupported openings may be cut).
In another embodiment, the cutting bit has a diameter of 250 mm and cuts a slot 154 that is nominally 250 mm tall and 250 mm deep, leaving protruding uncut rock sections 158 that are generally 400 mm tall and 250 mm deep. The protruding sections 158 are then broken as described above. The cutting method according to this embodiment requires cutting less than half of the rock than would be cut using conventional hard rock cutting methods. This configuration (i.e., a narrower cutting bit diameter and relatively wide uncut rock sections 158) may be particularly useful for mining hard rock with shear planes and fractures, or rock that has medium strength.
Furthermore, the cut-and-break method provides cuts or slots 154 that are separated by uncut rock sections 158, permitting a mining machine 10 to incorporate additional cutter heads 22 supported on additional booms 18 and operating simultaneously, effectively doubling the cutting rate. In addition, each of the cutter heads 22 in a multiple cutter head arrangement can operate toward one another, effectively counteracting the majority of cutting-induced boom forces that are typically transmitted through the machine 10 and into mine floor or the surrounding rock mass. Also, an embodiment including two cutter heads 22 supported on separate booms 18 can impart much larger forces on the protruding rock sections 158, thereby increasing the allowable height of the protruding rock section 158 to be broken. Each boom 18 can simultaneously impart loads from an undercut and an overcut position. By maintaining separation between the centers of the booms 18, the cutter heads 22 apply a torque on the rock in addition to exerting a direct force and dynamic cutting action.
The operation of the cylinders 72 provides omni-directional control of the cutter head 22 in order to maintain a desired orientation of the cutter head 22 relative to the mine wall 26 (i.e., the angle of attack). In addition, the cylinders 72 can more accurately sense the force feedback from the cutter head 22, providing accurate measurement of the cutting force exerted by the cutter head 22 and permitting the operator to more precisely control the cutting force. An automated system controls the cutting force based on various factors, such as oscillation frequency or speed, mass of the inertial member, and eccentricity of the exciter member. In other embodiments, a different type of cutter head (including a cutter head that does not include the exciter mass) may be coupled to the mounting bracket 58 by the cylinders 72.
As shown in
In the embodiment of
In another embodiment, shown in
In other embodiments, the lobes 334a, 334b are counter-rotating such that the lobe 334a rotates about the axis 298 in a first direction while the other lobe 334b rotates about the axis 298 in an opposite second direction. When the counter-rotating lobes 334a, 334b have the same mass, the cutter head 222 produces a jackhammer-like action on the cutting edge of the cutting bit. Due to the configuration of the cutting bit 286, the jackhammer effect acts at a 90 degree angle. Alternatively, if the lobes 334a, 334b have different masses, the counter-rotating exciter member 294 will drive the edge of the cutting bit 286 along a path 148 (
As shown in
The cutting clearance system eliminates hoses or other fluid conduit near the cutting interface. Furthermore, the cutting clearance system does not require additional moving parts inside the cutter head 222, since the first passage 374 is fixed and statically sealed to the cutting bit 286. In addition, embedding the nozzles 382 in the cutting bit 286 reduces the potential for damage to the fluid circuit or blockage caused by cuttings or debris.
Unlike conventional oscillating disc cutter systems that merely allow for adjusting the motion or speed of the disc cutter, the mining machine 10 monitors certain characteristics of the cutter head 22 and incorporates feedback from the cutting interface to adjust certain parameters. The mining machine 10 detects changes in conditions of the cutting operation (e.g., a change in rock hardness or density) and incorporates the sensed information into a feedback control loop to modify the operating parameters of the cutter head 22 and optimize cutting performance. Such operating parameters may include the depth of cut, the angle of attack of the cutting bit 86 relative to the mine wall, the eccentricity of the exciter member 94, the oscillation frequency of the exciter member 94. Other factors (such as the diameter of the cutting bit 86, the geometry of the cutting edge and cutting tips, and the cutting clearance) may be modified through manual adjustments.
The cutting effectiveness of the cutter head 22 at least partially depends on the velocity of the inertial member 90 in the direction of cutting at the moment the cutting bit 86 impacts the mine wall, and on the frequency of the impacts between the cutting bit 86 and the mine wall. The velocity and frequency are controlled to optimize the velocity and the frequency of the impact of the cutter head 22 with the mine wall. The velocity and frequency can be controlled through various parameters, such as the effective mass of the exciter member 94, operating frequency of the exciter member 94, the stiffness of the cutter head 22 coupling member, the feed force from the boom, etc.
Referring to
In one embodiment, the control system adjusts the force exerted by the boom 18 and varies the oscillation frequency of the exciter member 94 in order to increase or decrease cutting energy. These modifications optimize productivity by increasing cutting velocity when possible. In addition, the condition of the tool may be monitored to detect changes in productivity and feed force as the cutting bit becomes blunt.
In another embodiment, the cutter head 22 is controlled by directly sensing an indicator of the force exerted by the cutting bit 86 on the mine wall 26 in real-time. For example, the control system may include a load cell (e.g., a multi-axis strain gauge; not shown) positioned on the cutting bit 86 to detect the stress on the cutting bit. The cutting force is calculated based on the measured stress. In addition, the control system may include sensors, such as infrared sensors, for monitoring the temperature at the cutting interface. The load sensor and thermal sensor provide accurate measurements of the performance of the cutter head 22, permitting accurate adjustment of certain parameters (such as cutting speed or feed force) in order to optimize the closed loop control and optimize the power provided at the cutting interface. In another embodiment, the control system includes measuring a cutting speed of the cutting bit 86 with non-contact sensors and varying a feed rate of the cutter head 22 to optimize a cutting rate. Other embodiments can incorporate other adaptive features to optimize performance of the cutter head 22.
In general, increasing the power delivered by a cutter head 22 to the mine wall 26 generally results in a larger amount of rock cut from the wall 26. The power delivered by the cutter head 22 varies depending on the rotation speed of the cutting bit 86, the eccentricity of the cutting bit 86, the mass of the inertial member 90 and the exciter member 94, and the cutting feed force. In one embodiment, one or more of these parameters remain fixed due to the inherent characteristics of the mining machine 10 and the remaining parameters are dynamically controlled to continuously monitor and optimize the power output of the cutter head 22. For example, a selected parameter may be varied slightly and the system detects whether the variation increases the cutting rate. If so, the selected parameter is adjusted further in the same direction. Otherwise, the parameter is adjusted in the opposite direction and any change in the cutting rate is monitored. The process is frequently repeated to ensure that the machine is generating maximum power output.
In another embodiment, the control system provides automated position and force control of the boom 18. The cutter head consistently operates at maximum capacity and at an optimum setting. In addition, the magnitude and direction of a load on the machine is known and controlled. The cutting force is the same for different applications, conditions, rock types etc., but the production rate varies depending on these parameters. Because the system is optimally tuned for substantially all conditions, it is not necessary to change the parameters if the mine conditions change (e.g., if the rock density changes). The cutting operation can be slowed down if required by reducing the oscillation speed of the cutting bit 86 and/or the exciter mass 94.
In other embodiments, the mining machine includes multiple cutter heads 22 coupled to a common boom 18. Each cutter head 22 is force-controlled as described above, while the common boom 18 is position-controlled. Each cutter head 22 constitutes a single cutter system with the position-controlled common boom 18 as described above; however, each cutter system is linked via the common boom 18. The multiple cutter system is controlled to progress through the mine wall 26 at a rate that is determined by the least productive individual cutter head 22 (i.e., the master cutter head). The more productive cutter head systems (i.e., slave cutter heads) are de-tuned to match the rate of the master cutter head in order to prevent the more productive systems from overrunning the position-controlled boom 18. In one embodiment, the slave cutter(s) are de-tuned by altering one of the operating parameters, (e.g., the rotation speed of the cutting bit). For example, a master cutter head operates at nominal speed, while the slave cutter heads operate at speeds slower than the rated value. If a slave cutter head begins to lag, its speed is increased until its cutting performance matches the master cutter. The parameter(s) of the master cutter head are continuously varied to maximize its power output as described above with respect to the single cutter head system.
If the speed of one of the slave cutter heads is adjusted to exceed the nominal cutting speed due to, for example, a change in cutting conditions, the slave cutter is automatically designated the master cutter head and the previous master cutter head becomes a slave. Therefore, the poorest performing cutter head is continuously adjusted to achieve its maximum possible performance and the other cutter heads are controlled to match this performance, thereby achieving maximum performance of the combined cutter head assembly. In one embodiment, a significant discrepancy in the relative performance of the cutter heads indicates either differing rock characteristics or cutter condition problems.
Thus, the invention provides, among other things, a cutter head for a mining machine. Although the invention has been described in detail with reference to certain preferred embodiments, variations and modifications exist within the scope and spirit of one or more independent aspects of the invention as described. Various features and advantages of the invention are set forth in the following claims.
This application is a continuation of prior-filed, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/266,386, filed Sep. 15, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/028,511, filed Sep. 16, 2013, which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/701,256, filed Sep. 14, 2012. The entire contents of these applications are incorporated by reference herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1093787 | Kuhn et al. | Apr 1914 | A |
| 1735583 | Morgan | Nov 1929 | A |
| 1953326 | Morgan | Apr 1934 | A |
| 2336335 | Zublin | Dec 1943 | A |
| 2336337 | Zublin | Dec 1943 | A |
| 2517267 | Watson | Aug 1950 | A |
| 2619338 | Lindgren | Nov 1952 | A |
| 2619339 | Cartlidge | Nov 1952 | A |
| 2654586 | Berry | Oct 1953 | A |
| 2659585 | McCallum | Nov 1953 | A |
| 2745651 | Herrmann | May 1956 | A |
| 2756039 | Barrett | Jul 1956 | A |
| 2776823 | Barrett | Jan 1957 | A |
| 3157437 | Gonski | Nov 1964 | A |
| 3197256 | Hlinsky | Jul 1965 | A |
| 3302974 | Hlinsky | Feb 1967 | A |
| 3306663 | Webster | Feb 1967 | A |
| 3353871 | Arentzen | Nov 1967 | A |
| 3355215 | Haspert et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
| 3408109 | Lockwood | Oct 1968 | A |
| 3412816 | Lautsch | Nov 1968 | A |
| 3446535 | Lauber | May 1969 | A |
| 3647263 | Lauber et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3663054 | Dubois | May 1972 | A |
| 3729056 | Paurat | Apr 1973 | A |
| 3719404 | Sterner | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3840271 | Sugden | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3922017 | Cobb | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3929378 | Frenyo et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3972571 | Benkowski | Aug 1976 | A |
| 3995907 | Dubois | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4005905 | Dubois | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4087131 | Peterson et al. | May 1978 | A |
| 4096917 | Harris | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4108494 | Kogler | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4230372 | Marten | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4248481 | Stoltefuss | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4273383 | Grisebach | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4302054 | Haskew et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4372403 | Beeman | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4377311 | Seller | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4470635 | Paurat et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4516807 | Eagles | May 1985 | A |
| 4548442 | Sugden et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4589701 | Beckmann et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4643483 | Brooks et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4647112 | Demoulin et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4662684 | Marten | May 1987 | A |
| 4682819 | Masse | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4741577 | Sato | May 1988 | A |
| 4755002 | Parrott | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4760513 | Edwards | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4796713 | Bechem | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4838614 | Pentith et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4838615 | Oldham | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4848486 | Bodine | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4878714 | Barnthaler et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4968098 | Hirsch | Nov 1990 | A |
| 5028092 | Coski | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5050934 | Brandl et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5087102 | Kiefer | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5112111 | Addington et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5190353 | Bechem | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5205612 | Sugden et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5210997 | Mountcastle, Jr. | May 1993 | A |
| 5234257 | Sugden et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5601153 | Ensminger et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5676125 | Kelly et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5697733 | Marsh | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5938288 | Saint-Pierre | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6086257 | Lee | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6561590 | Sugden | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6857706 | Hames et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6938702 | Saha et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 7182407 | Peach et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7325882 | Sugden et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7384104 | Sugden | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7431402 | Peach et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7490911 | Steinberg et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7695071 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7731298 | Merten et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7934776 | de Andrade | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7954735 | Belotserkovsky | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8079647 | Yao et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8276991 | Thomson | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8328292 | de Andrade et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8636324 | Skea | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8690262 | Ebner et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8727450 | de Andrade et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 9470087 | Smith et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 20020093239 | Sugden | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20050200192 | Sugden et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20070090678 | Peach et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070193810 | Steinberg et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20080156531 | Boone et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20090058172 | DeAndrade et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090066148 | Willison | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090127918 | Yao et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20100019563 | Thomson | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100260563 | Conroy et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20110062768 | Van Zyl et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110181097 | Skea | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20120098325 | Junker et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20130057044 | De Andrade et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20140077578 | Smith et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140091612 | Rowher et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140178155 | Feasey | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20150152728 | Hartwig et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20170204666 | Galler et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170211383 | Lugg et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170342829 | De Sousa et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180051561 | Daher et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180051562 | Daher et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180087379 | Lugg et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 466244 | Feb 1972 | AU |
| 2141984 | Aug 1996 | CA |
| 35975 | Feb 1988 | CL |
| 199600179 | Sep 1996 | CL |
| 199900483 | Mar 1999 | CL |
| 200901978 | Feb 2010 | CL |
| 101778998 | Jul 2010 | CN |
| 101828004 | Sep 2010 | CN |
| 102061914 | May 2011 | CN |
| 102305067 | Jan 2012 | CN |
| 102513998 | Jun 2012 | CN |
| 102587911 | Jul 2012 | CN |
| 102606154 | Jul 2012 | CN |
| 102704927 | Oct 2012 | CN |
| 102733803 | Oct 2012 | CN |
| 202500560 | Oct 2012 | CN |
| 202991028 | Jun 2013 | CN |
| 103206213 | Jul 2013 | CN |
| 103498671 | Jan 2014 | CN |
| 104047603 | Sep 2014 | CN |
| 104500086 | Apr 2015 | CN |
| 204283458 | Apr 2015 | CN |
| 4123307 | Dec 1992 | DE |
| 4440261 | May 1996 | DE |
| 19900906 | Jul 2000 | DE |
| 0176234 | Apr 1986 | EP |
| 0329915 | Aug 1989 | EP |
| 2214963 | Sep 1989 | GB |
| S5540058 | Mar 1980 | JP |
| H02147793 | Jun 1990 | JP |
| 1779278 | Nov 1992 | RU |
| 2044125 | Sep 1995 | RU |
| 2142561 | Dec 1999 | RU |
| 2187640 | Aug 2002 | RU |
| 2209979 | Aug 2003 | RU |
| 2276728 | May 2006 | RU |
| 2441155 | Jan 2012 | RU |
| 323552 | Nov 1972 | SU |
| 514097 | May 1976 | SU |
| 581263 | Nov 1977 | SU |
| 619117 | Aug 1978 | SU |
| 750061 | Jul 1980 | SU |
| 804832 | Feb 1981 | SU |
| 962626 | Sep 1982 | SU |
| 1328521 | Aug 1987 | SU |
| 1712599 | Feb 1992 | SU |
| 1731946 | May 1992 | SU |
| 1744249 | Jun 1992 | SU |
| 0043637 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| 0046486 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| 0201045 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| 02066793 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| 2003062587 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| 03089761 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| 2012156843 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| 2006075910 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| 2016055087 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Examination Report No. 2 issued by the Australian Government for Application No. 2018203820 dated Aug. 5, 2020 (3 pages). |
| Chilean Patent Office Search Report and Examiner's Report for Application No. 201901190 dated Mar. 11, 2020 (18 pages including statement of relevance). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/060017 dated Apr. 15, 2014 (18 pages). |
| Second Office Action with English translation from the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China for Application No. 201380053676.0 dated Nov. 2, 2016 (20 pages). |
| Supplementary European Search Report from the European Patent Office for Application No. 13837734.6 dated Jul. 26, 2016 (1 page). |
| Chilean Office Action for Application No. 2015-000627 dated Oct. 7, 2017 (17 pages including Statement of Relevance). |
| Second Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2013315063 dated Nov. 9, 2017 (3 pages). |
| Fourth Office Action of the People's Republic of China for Application No. 201380053676.0 dated Jan. 3, 2018 (16 pages Including English Translation). |
| European Extended Search Report for Application No. 17201425.0 dated Mar. 1, 2018 (7 pages). |
| European Partial Search Report for Application No. 17201428.4 dated Mar. 8, 2018 (12 pages). |
| European Extended Search Report for Application No. 17201428.40 dated Jun. 18, 2018 (10 pages). |
| Peruvian Office Action for Application No. 000367-2015 dated Jul. 19, 2019 (11 pages including English translation). |
| Australian Patent Office Examination Report No. 1 for Application No. 2018203820 dated Aug. 12, 2019 (4 pages). |
| Chinese Patent Office Action for Application No. 201910052648.6 dated May 6, 2020 (13 pages including English translation). |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. 19218676.5 dated Apr. 2, 2020 (5 pages). |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. 19218632.8 dated Apr. 7, 2020 (7 pages). |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. 19218675.7 dated Apr. 3, 2020 (7 pages). |
| International Mining, “DynaCut Technology Achieving Breakthroughs,” <https://im-mining.com/2015/12/17/dynacut-technology-achieving-breakthroughs/> web page accessed Nov. 22, 2019. |
| Mining3 Mining, “CRCMining Joy Global Oscillating Disc Cutter (ODC) Hard Rock Cutting Machine,” <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anyPQWkH4rM> web page accessed Oct. 24, 2019. |
| Brazilian Patent Office Action for Application No. 122020010678 dated May 27, 2020 (58 pages including statement of relevance). |
| Chinese Patent Office Second Office Action for Application No. 201910052648.6 dated Mar. 4, 2021 (6 pages including English summary). |
| Chilean Patent Office Action and Search Report for Application No. 202002400 dated Jun. 26, 2021 (14 pages including statement of relevance). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200072050 A1 | Mar 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61701256 | Sep 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15266386 | Sep 2016 | US |
| Child | 16678656 | US | |
| Parent | 14028511 | Sep 2013 | US |
| Child | 15266386 | US |
