The present disclosure generally relates to an anvil for supporting cuts in sheet and roll stock. More particularly, the present disclosure pertains to an improved anvil for supporting cuts in composite ply material and its method of use.
Composite structures are typically constructed from multiple layers or plies. These plies may include a variety of materials such as carbon fiber, various other fibers, metal foils, and the like. In addition, the plies may be pre-impregnated with a resin and are often dispensed from a roll or spool. In roll form, the ply material may be referred to as “tape” and typically includes a paper backing film. This backing film generally prevents pre-impregnated ply material (prepreg) from adhering to itself and aids in handling the ply as the ply is applied to the tool and the layup. In particular, at the beginning and end of each ply placement, the ply material is generally cut to match the profile of the layup while the backing film is left intact. In this manner, the intact backing film is utilized to guide the severed ply on to the layup. During the layup process, the backing film is removed prior to placement of any subsequent ply. To provide support for the material being cut and facilitate cutting to a proper depth, an anvil is typically utilized. The anvil may be situated on the opposite side of the tape from the cutting tool and lays along the cutting path or is controlled to move in unison with the cutting tool.
A disadvantage associated with conventional anvils is the relatively high precision required to install and prepare them for use. Minor deviations in height adjustment may result in incomplete cuts of the ply material or cutting of the backing film. In particular, cuts in the backing film, introduced during the ply cutting procedure, may serve as a starting point for a tear. As the backing film is removed, torn backing film may remain on the ply, may fowl the ply placement head, and/or may lead to breakage of the backing film.
Another disadvantage associated with conventional anvils is that essentially any contact between the cutting tool and the anvil while setting up the cutting assembly or during use may result in damage to the cutting tool and/or the anvil. Even apparently minor damage to the cutting tool may produce unsatisfactory cutting performance and thus, require cutting tool replacement or regrinding. Damage to the anvil typically manifests itself as score marks. These score marks may cause cutting problems resulting from an altered cutting surface and generally tend to increase the drag of the tape as the tape is fed through the tape laying head. Down time associated with replacement of the cutting tool and/or anvil wastes resources.
Accordingly, it is desirable to provide a anvil that is capable of overcoming the disadvantages described herein at least to some extent.
The foregoing needs are met, to a great extent, by the present disclosure, wherein in some embodiments an anvil that facilitates cutting ply material is provided.
An embodiment of the present disclosure relates to a system for cutting a backed ply material with an ultrasonic blade. The system includes an ultrasonic cutting tool, and an anvil. The ultrasonic cutting tool includes a stylus. This stylus includes a tip. The anvil includes a first surface to support a backed ply material at a first height, a second surface to support the backed ply material at a second height, and a third surface in cooperative alignment with the tip. The third surface is disposed between the first surface and the second surface. The third surface provides support for the backing at a third height and the third height is relatively below the first height and the second height.
Another embodiment of the present disclosure relates to a cutting system including a cutting assembly and an anvil. The cutting assembly include an ultrasonic cutting tool having a stylus with a tip and an actuator to move the tip along a path. The path is oriented in a transverse manner relative to movement of a backed ply material. The anvil includes a rigid base for securing the anvil to the cutting assembly and a surface coinciding with the path. The system is configured to drive the tip into the surface and draw the tip along the path to generate a groove disposed upon the surface. The groove being in cooperative alignment with the tip.
There has thus been outlined, rather broadly, certain embodiments of the disclosure in order that the detailed description thereof herein may be better understood, and in order that the present contribution to the art may be better appreciated. There are, of course, additional embodiments of the disclosure that will be described below and which will form the subject matter of the claims appended hereto.
In this respect, before explaining at least one embodiment in detail, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited in its application to the details of construction and to the arrangements of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The various embodiments are capable of embodiments in addition to those described and of being practiced and carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein, as well as the abstract, are for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
As such, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the conception upon which this disclosure is based may readily be utilized as a basis for the designing of other structures, methods and systems for carrying out the several purposes of the present disclosure. It is important, therefore, that the claims be regarded as including such equivalent constructions insofar as they do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.
The present disclosure provides, in some embodiments, a cutter assembly, an anvil for the cutter assembly, and a method of generating the anvil. In an embodiment provides for an anvil for cutting a backed ply material.
Some embodiments will now be described with reference to the drawing figures, in which like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout. As shown in
In a particular example shown in
Depending upon the material to be cut and/or the particular application, the cutting assembly 10 may further include an ultrasonic transducer 30 and stylus orientation assembly 32. The ultrasonic transducer 30 generates vibrational energy that is transmitted through the stylus 14 and thereby facilitates cutting of various materials. The stylus orientation assembly 32 includes a stepper motor 34, pulleys 36 and 38, and belt 40. To modulate the orientation of the stylus 14, the stepper motor 32 is controlled to rotate the pulley 36. This rotation is transferred via the belt 40 to the pulley 38 which, in turn, causes the rotation of the stylus 14.
In operation, a sheet of ply material or backed ply material is fed between the platform 18 and the anvil 12 and generally controlled to move as indicated by direction B. By controlling the movement of the ply material in conjunction with the movement of the various components of the cutting assembly 10, the cutting assembly 10 is controllable to generate slitting cuts, butt cuts, tapers, curves, and the like.
Another material for use in the anvil 12 includes any suitable dimensionally stable, rigid and/or wear resistant material. Particular examples of such suitable materials include MICARTA® and other such high pressure laminates produced by Industrial Laminates/Norplex, Inc. of Postville, Iowa 52162, USA. An advantage of the use of high pressure laminates is that contact between the stylus 14 and a high pressure laminate tends to have fewer negative effects than contact between the stylus 14 and a relatively hard metal. In addition, in an embodiment of the disclosure, it is preferable that the material for use in the anvil 12 be readily carved or scraped as well as dimensionally stable, rigid and/or wear resistant. In this embodiment and as described herein, the stylus 12 may be utilized to generate the groove 16 in the insert 60. In this manner, the groove 16 may essentially correspond to a profile of the tip 44.
As shown in
According to an embodiment of the disclosure, the cutting assembly 10 is operable to cut a backed ply material 46. In this regard, the backed ply material 46 includes a ply 48 and a backing 50. In various embodiments of the disclosure, the ply material 46 may include any suitable sheet stock. Examples of suitable sheet stocks include: woven fiber fabric; oriented strand tape; metal foil such as aluminum alloy and titanium foil; composite materials such as titanium graphite metal-fiber laminates; and the like. In a particular embodiment, the ply material 48 is a graphite fiber tape pre-impregnated with an epoxy or toughened epoxy resin (pre-preg). In another particular embodiment, the ply material 48 is a toughened epoxy resin coated titanium foil. In general, the backing 50 lends support to the ply material 48 and aids in handling the ply material 48. In this regard, during layup operations, the backing 50 is typically removed. Examples of suitable backing materials generally include conventional backing materials as well as resilient, compliant, or materials otherwise polymeric in nature. For the purpose of this disclosure, the terms, “polymeric” and “polymer” and variations thereof are defined as a chemical compound or mixture of compounds formed by a chemical reaction in which two or more molecules combine to form a larger molecule that includes repeating structural units. In addition, other examples of suitable backing material and backed ply material may be found in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. not yet assigned, entitled, “Backing Film and Method for Ply Materials”, having inventor Richard B. Evans, and having a filing date of Apr. 22, 2004, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In operation, the backed ply material 46 is moved, relative to the stylus 14. Oriented as indicated by the direction B, the cutting assembly 10 is configured to produce a slitting operation. As shown in
Optionally, the anvil 12 includes a pair of transition surfaces 54 and 56 and a tapped bore 58. The transition surfaces 54 and 56, if present, facilitate alignment of the groove 16 with any suitable surface and/or tape guide. That is, according to an embodiment of the disclosure, the cutting assembly 10 is installed within a tape chute of a tape laying head. The tape chute includes surfaces and/or devices that guide the tape through the tape chute. When the anvil 12 is installed in the tape laying head, the groove 16 is typically aligned with the surfaces and/or devices that guide the tape through the tape chute. In some embodiments, the transition surfaces 54 and 56 facilitate this alignment. However, in other embodiments, the groove 16 aligned without the surfaces and/or devices that guide the tape through the tape chute.
The tapped bore 58, if present, facilitates securing the anvil 12 to the cutting assembly 10. For example, a threaded bolt configured to engage the tapped bore 58, may be utilized to secure the anvil 12 to a case or frame member of the cutting assembly 10 and/or other such structures of a tape laying head. However, the anvil 12 need not be secured in this manner, but rather, the anvil 12 may be secured relative to the stylus 14 via any suitable fastening device.
According to an embodiment of the disclosure, by utilizing a compliant material in the insert 60, the groove 16 varies in response to modulations of the stylus 14 and/or the backed ply material 46. That is, when the stylus 14 is in a slitting orientation, the groove 16 is shaped generally as shown in
At step 72 a “blank” for the anvil 12 is prepared. In this regard, a, “blank” is essentially an anvil similar to the anvil 12 illustrated in
At step 74 the blank is secured to the cutting assembly 10. For example, one or more bolts may be utilized to fasten the blank to the cutting assembly 10. In addition, the position of the blank may be modulated by various leveling devices such that the transition surfaces are properly positioned.
At step 76 the tip 44 is lowered towards the blank. The method of lowering the tip 44 towards the blank is dependent upon the particular configuration of the cutting assembly 10. In this regard, the disclosure is not limited by the method of lowering the tip, nor is the term, “lowering” to be construed as limiting, but rather, any suitable manner of controlling the tip 44 and the blank to be drawn towards one another are within the purview of the disclosure.
At step 78 it is determined whether the tip 44 has been lowered sufficiently. In general, the tip 44 is to drive into the blank to a predetermined depth. This predetermined depth is based on a variety of factors such as, for example: hardness of the blank, friability of the blank, hardness of the tip 44, durability of an edge of the tip 44, power of the various drive mechanisms of the cutting assembly 10, and the like. Generally, the predetermined depth is such that, when the tip 44 is draw across the blank at step 80, a relatively smooth groove is generated. As such, the predetermined depth is dependent generally upon the material characteristics of the blank and the tip 44 as well as the angle the tip 44 meets the blank and the speed at which the tip 44 is drawn across the blank. In a particular embodiment, the tip 44 is driven about 1 to 3 thousandths of an inch into the blank. If it is determined that the tip 44 has not been lowered to the predetermined depth, the tip 44 is lowered further at step 76. If it is determined that the tip 44 has been lowered to the predetermined depth, the tip 44 is drawn across the blank at step 80.
At step 80 the tip 44 is drawn across the blank. For example, the tip 44 is controlled to move relative to the blank as indicated by direction A as shown in
At step 82 it is determined whether the groove 16 is a predetermined depth. The predetermined depth of the groove 16 is dependent upon a variety of factors such as, for example: the material of the backing 50, the thickness of the backing 50, the configuration of the tip 44, the material characteristics of the ply 48, and the like. In general, the depth of the groove 16 is related to the thickness and material characteristics of the backed ply material 46. In an embodiment of the disclosure, the backing 50 is a relatively flexible, resilient material about 4 thousandths of an inch thick. In this embodiment, the predetermined depth of the groove 16 is about 3 thousandths of an inch deep. If it is determined that the groove 16 is not the predetermined depth, the tip 44 is lowered further at step 76. If it is determined that the groove 16 is the predetermined depth, the tip 44 is raised at step 84.
At step 84 the tip 44 is raised in preparation to perform ply cutting operations. It is an advantage of some embodiments of the present disclosure that setting the height of the tip 44 relative to the anvil 12 requires relatively less precision than in cutter assemblies employing conventional anvils. As such setup time is correspondingly reduced. Following this tip raising procedure, the cutting assembly idles or is shut down until ply cutting or other such operations are performed.
In addition, other embodiments of the disclosure include methods of generating the anvil 12 and/or the groove 16 that differ from that of the method 70. In particular, the groove 16 may be cast or milled into various metals. For example, a computer numerically controlled (CNC) milling machine may be instructed to mill the groove 16 into the anvil 12.
The many features and advantages of the various embodiments are apparent from the detailed specification, and thus, it is intended by the appended claims to cover all such features and advantages of the disclosure which fall within the true spirit and scope of the various embodiments. Further, since numerous modifications and variations will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the disclosure to the exact construction and operation illustrated and described, and accordingly, all suitable modifications and equivalents may be resorted to, falling within the scope of the various embodiments.
This application is a Division of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/829,269, filed on Apr. 22, 2004, titled “CUTTING ANVIL AND METHOD,” the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in the entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3645304 | Thrasher | Feb 1972 | A |
3683736 | Loose | Aug 1972 | A |
3788175 | Davis | Jan 1974 | A |
3918337 | Lindblad et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
4060017 | Backlund | Nov 1977 | A |
4077290 | Hreha | Mar 1978 | A |
4133711 | August et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4208238 | August et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4373412 | Gerber et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4438698 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4867023 | Kozyrski et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4867834 | Alenskig et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4920495 | Pilkington | Apr 1990 | A |
4925515 | Yoshimura et al. | May 1990 | A |
5028052 | Miller | Jul 1991 | A |
5072640 | Greve et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5265508 | Bell et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5368464 | Stewart et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5480508 | Manabe et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5688351 | Thomas | Nov 1997 | A |
5944924 | Engle et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6048353 | Freed et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6152003 | Jung | Nov 2000 | A |
6637490 | Azulay | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6720058 | Weeks et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6749102 | Yamano et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755105 | Downing | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6813985 | Gharst et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
20040079208 | Carlson et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050081692 | Mosiewicz et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050235795 | Evans | Oct 2005 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Appeal brief dated Jun. 23, 2010 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 23 Pages. |
USPTO examiner's answer dated Sep. 17, 2010 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 17 Pages. |
Amendment filed with RCE dated Apr. 27, 2007 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 12 Pages. |
Amendment filed with RCE dated Aug. 20, 2008 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 11 Pages. |
Amendment filed with RCE dated Sep. 21, 2009 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 22 Pages. |
USPTO final office action dated Feb. 1, 2010 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 11 Pages. |
USPTO final office action dated Feb. 22, 2007 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 13 Pages. |
USPTO final office action dated Mar. 21, 2008 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 10 Pages. |
USPTO final office action dated Jun. 22, 2009 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 12 Pages. |
USPTO non-final office action dated Oct. 16, 2009 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 9 Pages. |
USPTO non-final office action dated Dec. 5, 2008 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 11 Pages. |
USPTO non-final office action dated Feb. 9, 2006 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 14 Pages. |
USPTO non-final office action dated Jul. 26, 2007 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 12 Pages. |
Reply brief dated Oct. 18, 2010 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 4 Pages. |
Response to final office action dated Jul. 31, 2009 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 13 Pages. |
Response to office action dated Nov. 18, 2009 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 13 Pages. |
Response to office action dated Dec. 12, 2007 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 15 Pages. |
Response to office action dated Mar. 3, 2009 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 19 Pages. |
Response to office action dated Aug. 9, 2006 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 12 Pages. |
USPTO restriction requirement dated Oct. 30, 2006 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 5 Pages. |
USPTO restriction requirement dated Nov. 22, 2005 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 5 Pages. |
Response to restriction requirement dated Nov. 27, 2006 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 1 Page. |
Response to restriction requirement dated Nov. 30, 2005 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,269, 1 Page. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090000451 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10829269 | Apr 2004 | US |
Child | 12205573 | US |