This application claims priority to United Kingdom Application No. 1913436.0, filed Sep. 18, 2019, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The present disclosure related generally to surgical instruments which are used to assist in the removal, repair or replacement of tissue, and particularly to cutting blocks for use in the resection of a bone.
Joint arthroplasty is a well-known surgical procedure by which a diseased and/or damaged natural joint is replaced by a prosthetic joint. For example, in a total knee arthroplasty surgical procedure, a patient's natural knee joint is partially or totally replaced by a prosthetic knee joint or knee prosthesis.
A typical knee prosthesis includes a tibial tray, a femoral component, and a polymer insert or bearing positioned between the tibial tray and the femoral component. The tibial tray generally includes a plate having a stem extending distally therefrom, and the femoral component generally includes a pair of spaced apart condylar elements, which include surfaces that articulate with corresponding surfaces of the polymer bearing. The stem of the tibial tray is configured to be implanted in a surgically-prepared medullary canal of the patient's tibia, and the femoral component is configured to be coupled to a surgically-prepared distal end of a patient's femur.
From time-to-time, a revision knee surgery may need to be performed on a patient. In such a procedure, the previously-implanted knee prosthesis is surgically removed and a replacement knee prosthesis is implanted. In some revision knee surgeries, all of the components of the previously-implanted knee prosthesis, including, for example, the tibial tray, the femoral component, and the polymer bearing, may be surgically removed. In other revision knee surgeries, only part of the previously-implanted knee prosthesis may be removed and replaced.
An example of a conventional cutting block used during revision surgery on a left tibia is shown in
The tibial cutting block is often larger than those used during primary knee arthroplasty. This is so that the cutting block can accommodate the connection to an intramedullary surgical instrument, such as a reamer. Furthermore, the cutting block may include cutting slots for augments.
The revision tibial cutting block 100 shown in
A need therefore exists for an improved tibial cutting block having an optimal placement of the pin hole array for secure mounting of the block onto the tibia, during revision knee arthroplasty, regardless of the size of the patient's bone.
Aspects of the disclosure are set out in the accompanying independent and dependent claims. Combinations of features from the dependent claims may be combined with features of the independent claims as appropriate and not merely as explicitly set out in the claims.
As shown in
The bone pin holes in this exemplary tibial cutting block are labelled “0”, “2.5” and “5”. The centrepoint of each hole is vertically offset by about 2.5 mm. The block may be mounted on the tibia by inserting pins first through the holes marked “0”. This technique will allow the block to be shifted inferiorly by 2.5 mm or 5 mm should additional resection be needed. In other constructions, the centrepoint of each hole is vertically offset such that the block may be shifted inferiorly by 2 mm or 4 mm should additional resection be needed. In some other constructions, the centrepoint of each hole is vertically offset such that the block to be shifted inferiorly by 1.5 mm or 3 mm should additional resection be needed.
Rather than simply replicating the bone pin hole array found in the primary tibial cutting blocks, in some constructions of a tibial cutting block according to the present invention, the most medially-placed hole of the tri-hole array is shifted laterally. Furthermore, the most medially-placed hole is interconnected with the other two bone pin holes. This arrangement is advantageous because it reduces the distance that the cutting block must be moved laterally when the block is shifted in the superior-inferior direction. As a result, this eliminates or minimises the extent that the lateral part of the cutting block impinges on the patella tendon during movement.
Advantageously, this design also reduces the overall width of the cutting block in the medial-lateral direction. Again, this eliminates or minimises the risk of impingement of the patella tendon, whilst also increasing the likelihood that the cutting block can be mounted on bone pins that have been securely inserted into the tibial metaphysis.
According to a first aspect, there is provided a cutting block for use in preparing a bone during orthopaedic surgery, the cutting block comprising:
a bone attachment face, and
a front face opposing the bone attachment face,
wherein the cutting block further comprises at least a first group of bone pin holes, each hole being configured for removable receipt of a bone pin, the first group of pin holes including at least two bone pin holes that extend between the bone attachment face and the front face,
wherein the at least two bone pin holes extend parallel to each other in an anterior-posterior direction,
wherein the at least two bone pin holes are offset from each other in at least one of a superior-inferior direction or a medial-lateral direction, and
wherein the at least two bone pin holes are interconnected.
In some constructions of the cutting block, the at least two bone pin holes overlap. This overlap may be achieved by breaking through the walls to create a continuous, albeit offset hole.
In some further constructions, the cutting block includes a third pin hole which overlaps with the second pin hole. The third bone pin hole is located inferior of the second bone pin hole.
The third bone pin hole may also be offset from the second bone pin hole in a medial-lateral direction.
The third bone pin hole may also be aligned with the first pin hole in the medial-lateral direction.
Once the cutting block has been positioned on a bone, and an initial resection has be performed, the surgeon may decide that an additional resection is required. If this is the case, it may be considered desirable to maintain the orientation of the cutting block relative to the initial resection. This may be achieved by mounting the cutting block on at least two bone pins that are spaced apart and aligned in the medial-lateral direction. In order to do this, the cutting block may further comprise a second group of bone pin holes, which are spaced apart from the first group of bone pin holes.
Accordingly, the cutting block described herein may further comprise a second group of bone pin holes, wherein the second group of bone pin holes includes at least two bone pin holes extending between the bone attachment face and the front face,
wherein the at least two bone pin holes extend parallel to each other in an anterior-posterior direction,
wherein the at least two bone pin holes are offset from each other in at least one of a superior-inferior direction or a medial-lateral direction, and
wherein the at least two bone pin holes are interconnected.
In terms of the geometry of the bone pin holes, each pin hole may be have a circular cross section when viewed from the anterior face of the cutting block. It is envisaged that the cutting block may be 3D printed, and accordingly to facilitate this method of manufacture each pin hole may have a polygonal cross section when viewed from the anterior face of the cutting block. For example, each bone pin hole may have a hexagonal or pentagonal cross section when viewed from the anterior face of the cutting block.
Advantageously, the geometry of each bone pin hole is selected such that at least three points of contact are maintained between the wall of the bone pin hole and the bone pin. This improves the stability of the connection, and hence the stability of the mounted cutting block.
The cutting block may be manufactured from a metal, for example stainless steel.
A surgeon may utilise one of the perimeter faces of the cutting block as a resection surface for guiding the resection of a bone to create a surgically-prepared surface. For example, the surgeon may utilise the superior face as a resection guide. However, it is also envisaged that in some constructions of the cutting block, a separate cutting guide slot, sized to receive a cutting tool, is provided within the cutting block.
The cutting block may be a tibial cutting block for use in either primary or revision knee arthroplasty. The cutting block may also be a femoral cutting block.
According to a second aspect, there is provided a surgical kit comprising a cutting block as herein described.
According to a third aspect, there is provided a method of surgically preparing a bone, the method comprising:
inserting a bone pin into the bone,
securing a cutting block to the bone, said cutting block comprising:
a bone attachment face, and
a front face opposing the bone attachment face,
wherein the cutting block further comprises at least a first group of bone pin holes, the first group of pin holes including at least two bone pin holes that extend between the bone attachment face and the front face,
wherein the at least two bone pin holes extend parallel to each other in an anterior-posterior direction,
wherein the at least two bone pin holes are offset from each other in at least one of a superior-inferior direction or a medial-lateral direction, and
wherein the at least two bone pin holes are interconnected, wherein the step of securing the cutting block to the bone includes:
aligning at least one of the two bone pin holes with the bone pin, and
sliding the cutting block in a posterior direction along the bone pin towards the bone.
According to a fourth aspect, there is provided a method of surgically preparing a proximal end of a tibia, the method comprising inserting a bone pin into the tibia,
securing a tibial cutting block to the tibia, said cutting block comprising
wherein the cutting block further comprises at least a first group of bone pin holes, the first group of pin holes including at least two bone pin holes that extend between the bone attachment face and the front face,
wherein the at least two bone pin holes extend parallel to each other in an anterior-posterior direction,
wherein the at least two bone pin holes are offset from each other in at least one of a superior-inferior direction or a medial-lateral direction, and
wherein the at least two bone pin holes are interconnected, wherein the step of securing the cutting block to the bone includes:
aligning at least one of the two bone pin holes with the bone pin, and
sliding the tibial cutting block in a posterior direction along the bone pin towards the tibia.
Constructions of the cutting block will be described hereinafter, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like reference signs relate to like elements and in which:
While the concepts of the present disclosure are susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific exemplary embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that there is no intent to limit the concepts of the present disclosure to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Constructions of the cutting block are described in the following with reference to the accompanying drawings.
A conventional tibial cutting block 100 used in revision knee arthroplasty is shown in
A conventional tibial cutting block 200 using in primary knee arthroplasty is shown in
The first group of holes includes three bone pin holes, 202a, 202b, 202c arranged about a central point 206. The first bone pin hole 202a is the most superiorly located hole. The second bone pin hole 202b is placed inferior of the first bone pin hole 202a, and is also offset in the medial direction. The third bone pin hole 202c is placed inferior of the second bone pin hole 202b, and is offset in the lateral direction. When viewed from the front, also referred to as the anterior face of the cutting block, the first and third 202a, 202c bone pin holes are aligned in the medial-lateral direction.
The array of the first group of bone pins fits within a virtual equilateral triangle 208.
The bone pins holes 202a, 202b, and 202c extend parallel to each other in the anterior-posterior direction. The bone pins holes 202a, 202b, and 202c are not interconnected. Each hole is discrete, and there is “land” between each hole.
The cutting block also includes a second group of bone pin holes 210 arranged on a medial portion 212 of the block. The second group of holes includes three bone pin holes, 210a, 210b, 210c arranged about a central point 214.
The first bone pin hole 210a is the most superiorly located hole. The second hole 210b is placed inferior of the first bone pin hole 210a, and is also offset with respect to the first bone pin hole in the medial direction. The third bone pin hole 210c is placed inferior of the second bone pin hole 210b, and is offset with respect to second bone pin hole in the lateral direction. When viewed from the front, also referred to as the anterior face of the cutting block, the first and third 210a, 210c bone pin holes are aligned in the medial-lateral direction.
The bone pins holes 210a, 210b, and 210c extend parallel to each other in the anterior-posterior direction. The bone pins holes 210a, 210b, and 210c are not interconnected. Each hole is discrete, and there is “land” between each hole.
Each pin hole 210a, 210b and 201c has a center point, with a vertical spacing between center points of about 2.5 mm.
The cutting block includes a slot 216 which is configured for connection to a reamer placed within the intramedullary canal.
Turning now to
The cutting block includes a first group of bone pin holes 412 arranged on a lateral portion 414 of the block.
The first group of holes includes three bone pin holes, 412a, 412b, 412c. The bone pin holes extend between the bone attachment face and the front face, and extend parallel to each other in an anterior-posterior direction.
The first bone pin hole 412a is the most superiorly located hole. The second bone pin hole 412b is placed inferior of the first bone pin hole 412a, and is also offset with respect to the first bone pin hole in the medial direction. The first and second bone pin holes 412a, 412b overlap with each other. The wall member of the first and second bone pin holes is omitted in the overlapping region. As a result, the two holes are interconnected in the overlapping region.
The third bone pin hole 412c is placed inferior of the second bone pin hole 412b, and is offset with respect to the second bone pin hole in the lateral direction.
The second and third bone pin holes 412b, 412c overlap with each other. The wall member of the second and third bone pin holes is omitted in the overlapping region. As a result, the two holes are interconnected in the overlapping region.
When viewed from the front face, also referred to as the anterior face of the cutting block, the first and third 412a, 412c bone pin holes are aligned in the medial-lateral direction.
Each pin hole 412a, 412b and 412c has a centre point, with a vertical spacing between centre points of about 2.5 mm. Hole 412c is labelled 0. Hole 412b is labelled 2.5. Hole 412a is labelled 5. The cutting block may be initially be mounted on the tibia by inserting a bone pin hole 412c. This technique will allow the block to be shifted by 2.5 mm or 5 mm should additional resection be needed. This is achieved by removing the cutting block, and remounting it onto the tibia with either bone pin hole 412b, or bone pin hole 412a receiving the bone pin.
The cutting block also includes a slot 416 for connection to a reamer inserted within the intramedullary canal. The slot has a central point 418.
The overlapping manner of the first, second and third bone pin holes 412a, 412b and 412c narrows the array of holes. As such, as shown in
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3727928 | Benjamin | Apr 1973 | A |
4710075 | Davison | Dec 1987 | A |
4952213 | Bowman et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5100409 | Coates et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5176684 | Ferrante et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5356414 | Cohen et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5415662 | Ferrante et al. | May 1995 | A |
5569259 | Ferrante et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571194 | Gabriel | Nov 1996 | A |
5601563 | Burke et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5613970 | Houston et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5634927 | Houston et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5681316 | DeOrio et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683397 | Vendrely et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5702460 | Carls et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5769854 | Bastian et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5931841 | Ralph | Aug 1999 | A |
5976147 | Lasalle et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6063091 | Lombardo | May 2000 | A |
6488687 | Masini | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6575980 | Robie et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6945145 | Kesinger et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7048477 | Abrams | May 2006 | B2 |
7497874 | Metzger et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7547327 | Collazo | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7559765 | Courvosier | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7682362 | Dees, Jr. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7744600 | Rangaiah et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7963968 | Dees, Jr. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8002777 | Fox et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8038681 | Koenemann | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8187280 | May et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8377141 | McMinn | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8425524 | Aker et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8771280 | Bailey et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8986310 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9028501 | Thomas et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9113915 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9232950 | Chaney | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9282981 | Chaney | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9364243 | Beedall | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9579113 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9636122 | Chaney et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9962173 | Thomas et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10098646 | Ardito | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10413307 | Chaney | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10470898 | Hathaway et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10682195 | Tredinnick | Jun 2020 | B2 |
20010001121 | Lombardo et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20030114859 | Grusin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040039450 | Griner et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040078043 | Masini | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087960 | Kinnett | May 2004 | A1 |
20040153087 | Sanford et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040225368 | Plumet et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050192588 | Garcia | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060173463 | Dees | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195113 | Masini | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060241634 | Tuttle et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070010890 | Collazo | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070073305 | Lionberger et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070173850 | Rangaiah et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080091273 | Hazebrouck | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080183177 | Fox et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080228189 | Fox et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080312659 | Metzger et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090088762 | Koenemann | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090088763 | Aram et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125114 | May et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090204115 | Dees, Jr. et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222008 | Hogg et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100076441 | May et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100121334 | Couture et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100234850 | Dees, Jr. et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110093081 | Chana et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110218541 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110307067 | Dees | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120310246 | Belcher et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120323334 | Jones et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130144293 | Wilkinson | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130144296 | Yoko et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130165936 | Myers | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130325014 | Sordelet et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130325016 | Sordelet et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130325018 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130325019 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130325021 | Sordelet et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130325136 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140276858 | Major et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20160089161 | Ardito et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20170333215 | Wolfson et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
706593 | Dec 2013 | CH |
101742972 | Jun 2010 | CN |
101849864 | Oct 2010 | CN |
101879099 | Nov 2010 | CN |
947169 | Oct 1999 | EP |
2145590 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2777550 | Sep 2014 | EP |
2777556 | Sep 2014 | EP |
2748389 | Nov 1997 | FR |
2752519 | Feb 1998 | FR |
2943528 | Oct 2010 | FR |
2323037 | Sep 1998 | GB |
11104155 | Apr 1999 | JP |
2009006066 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2010057527 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2168315 | Jun 2001 | RU |
2148960 | May 2020 | RU |
9625123 | Aug 1996 | WO |
9730661 | Aug 1997 | WO |
9852499 | Nov 1998 | WO |
0013597 | Mar 2000 | WO |
2007041644 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007114841 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2010019284 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2016126168 | Aug 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Zimmer NexGen LCCK, Surgical Technique for use with LCCK 4-in-1 Instrument, 2009, 52 pages. |
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Sigma Revision and M.B.T. Revision Tray, Surgical Technique, 2008, 82 pages. |
Smith & Nephew, Legion, Revision Knee System, Surgical Technique, 2005, 40 pages. |
Biomet, Vanguard SSK, Revision System, Surgical Technique, Feb. 2008, 64 pages. |
GMK Revision, Surgical Technique, Ref. 99.27.12US rev. 1, 1999, 74 pages. |
PFC Sigma RP-F, Specialist 2 Instruments, Surgical Technique, Performance in Flexion, 2007, 32 pages. |
P.F.C. Sigma Rotating Platform Knee System with M.B.T Tray, Primary Procedure with a Curved or Posterior Stablised Implant, 2003, 43 pages. |
LCS High Performance Instruments, Surgical Technique, 2008, 44 pages. |
Sigma High Performance Instruments, Design Rationale, 2007, 12 pages. |
Sigma High Performance Instruments, Classic Surgical Technique, 2010, 52 pages. |
Attune Knee System Surgical Technique, 2013, 73 pages. |
Redacted Memorandum with Appendix A, dated Jan. 26, 2010, outlining a surgical instrument evaluation that commenced in 2010, 37 pages. |
“Reinstall Wave 1 Evaluation Surgical Technique,” used during the surgical instrument evaluation that commenced in 2010, 36 pages. |
Tray configuration cards showing the instruments used during the surgical instrument evaluation that commenced in 2010, 8 pages. |
Declaration of Gary M. Lindsay dated Dec. 23, 2014, 5 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2017/033295, dated Dec. 18, 2017, 8 pages. |
International Search Report issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/033307, dated Sep. 25, 2017, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2017/033278, dated Nov. 21, 2017, 8 pages. |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US2017/033295, dated Sep. 4, 2017, 14 pages. |
GB Search Report from corresponding GB Application No. GB1913436.0 dated Feb. 24, 2020, 1 page. |
European Search Report, European Patent Application No. 20178555.7, dated Sep. 24, 2020, 8 pages. |
Attune Revision Knee System Fixed Bearing Surgical Technique, DSUS/JRC/0217/2020 Rev. 2, 129094-191206 DSEM, (2019) 228 pgs. |
Attune Knee System, Intuition Instruments Surgical Technique, DSUS/JRC/0316/1437 Rev. 6, DePuy Synthes (2017, 2018, 2019, 2020), 118 pages. |
Attune Revision LPS Insert with S-ROM Noiles Rotating Hinge System and LPS System Surgical Technique, 103478192 Rev. 2, (2018), 92 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210077122 A1 | Mar 2021 | US |