The present application claims priority to Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-202867, filed Sep. 30, 2013, incorporated herein in its entirety.
The present invention relates to a cutting device for metal foil as represented by aluminum foil, copper foil and the like.
As this kind of metal foil cutting device, an example as discussed in Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2007-152436 has been proposed. A cutting device as discussed in Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2007-152436 is provided for the purpose of cutting metal foil for use in a capacitor such as aluminum, tantalum, niobium, titanium and zirconium by a shearing action caused by an engagement between a first blade and a second blade, in which both of the blades are adapted to have a depth of engagement (or a lap margin) and a clearance therebetween within a specified numerical value range.
However, the cutting device discussed in Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2007-152436 is provided based on a shearing action caused by an engagement between the first and second blades and therefore it cannot avoid the occurrence of a phenomenon where metal foil is pulled toward the side of an engaged portion of both of the blades. The trend becomes noticeable as the thickness dimension of a metal foil to be cut increases; this is because the depth of engagement and a clearance between the blades are inevitably increased according to the increase of the thickness dimension of metal foil. As a result, the metal foil is moved thereby possibly causing the deterioration of cutting quality and the occurrence of “burr” and “roll-up” on the cut surface.
The present invention has been made in view of such problems, for the purpose of providing a cutting device able to restrain metal foil from being dragged and moved at the time of cutting while basically performing cutting under a shearing action caused by the engagement of both blades.
The present invention is adapted to cut metal foil placed on a lower blade by a shearing action based on an engagement of a lower blade and an upper blade, in which a holding device having a larger friction coefficient than that of the lower blade is provided on the lower blade in such a manner as to interpose between the lower blade and metal foil placed thereon.
According to the present invention, a holding device having a larger friction coefficient than that of the lower blade is provided to intervene between the lower blade and metal foil, with which it becomes possible to prevent the metal foil from being dragged and moved at the time of cutting and prevent the occurrence of “burr” and “roll-up” while improving cutting accuracy and cutting quality.
As shown in
Lower die 1 is provided including lower holder 3, and lower blade 4 fixed onto lower holder 3 and formed of steel, a super hard metal or the like. Lower blade 4 has a corner part formed between its front-side vertical wall and top surface, the corner part serving as cutting edge 4a of the lower blade 4 side. An object to be cut, i.e., a long lengths of metal foil base material (for example, a long lengths of multilayered metal foil base material W) is to be supplied and placed onto lower blade 4.
On the other hand, upper die 2 is provided having upper holder 5 as a main body, with which upper blade 6 formed of steel, a super hard metal or the like and pad 7 serving as a pressing member formed of steel or the like are combined. Pad 7 is secured to pad holder 8. Upper blade 6 has a corner part at its lower end portion and on the side closer to pad 7, the corner part serving as cutting edge 6a. Additionally, upper blade 6 is supported to be vertically movable with respect to upper holder 5, while pad holder 8 is vertically movably and elastically supported by upper holder 5 through elastic member 9 such as urethane and compression coil spring. In the state where pad 7 is brought up to the uppermost position as shown in
In the thus constructed cutting device, when the long lengths of multilayered metal foil base material W is conveyed from the left of
Even if upper die 2 is further lowered, pad 7 is kept being pressed against metal foil base material W and therefore only upper holder 5 and upper blade 6 are moved downward, so that cutting edge 4a of the lower blade 4 side and cutting edge 6a of the upper blade 6 side comes to engage with each other. By receiving a shearing action based on the engagement between cutting edge 4a of the lower blade 4 side and cutting edge 6a of the upper blade 6 side, metal foil piece P having a certain size is to be cut out of metal foil base material W as shown in
When upper die 2 is moved upward after cutting, firstly upper blade 6 moves upward and then pad 7 moves upward to go away from metal foil base material W. Thus the whole of upper die 2 including upper blade 6 and pad 7 is reset to the initial state as shown in
With the above arrangement, when restraining lower blade 4 and metal foil base material W under pressure as shown in
Face sheets 10, 11 are conditioned to have a friction coefficient larger than that of metal that forms lower blade 4 and pad 7. In the present embodiment, a resin sheet having a larger friction coefficient than that of metal and formed of polypropylene (PP) or polyethylene (PE) is adopted as face sheets 10, 11. For example, in the case of regarding face sheet 10 of the lower blade 4 side, it has a width dimension Wa of about 2 mm as shown in
Additionally, as apparent from
Hence, when metal foil base material W is cut under a searing action based on the engagement between cutting edge 4a of the lower blade 4 side and cutting edge 6a of the upper blade 6 side in the state where metal foil base material W is restricted under pressure by face sheet 10 of the lower blade 4 side and face sheet 11 of the pad 7 side, a section of metal foil base material W overhanging from the upper blade 4 side toward the upper blade 6 side is to be depressed by upper blade 6. Due to the depressing force of upper blade 6, even a section restricted under pressure between upper and lower face sheets 10, 11 tends to be dragged and moved in advance of cutting.
However, the upper and lower face sheets 10, 11 have so large friction coefficient as to generate a great frictional force against metal foil base material W, thereby resisting the action of metal foil base material W inclinable to be dragged by the above-mentioned depressing force of upper blade 6. With this, it becomes possible to ease the action of metal foil base material W inclinable to be dragged in the depression direction by upper blade 6. As a result, metal foil base material W and metal foil piece P cut out thereof can obtain a good cutting quality at their cut surfaces and the cut surfaces are prevented from the occurrence of “burr” and “roll-up”, thereby contributing to the improvement of the cutting quality.
Since lower blade 4 and pad 7 are provided with face sheets 10, 11 at positions opposite to each other, metal foil base material W before cutting can surely be restricted under pressure while absorbing unevenness on the top surface of lower blade 4 and the pressing surface of pad 7, defective parallelism between these surfaces etc, so that the action of metal foil base material W inclinable to be dragged in the depression direction by upper blade 6 can more excellently be suppressed.
Moreover, the upper and lower face sheets 10, 11 are disposed at a location distant from cutting edge 4a of the lower blade 4 side and from cutting edge 6a of the upper blade 6 side, respectively, as shown in
In view of the above, when the thickness β of face sheet 10 is larger, metal foil base material W which droops from the face sheet 10 side toward the cutting edge 4a side while lying over face sheet 10 and cutting edge 4a as shown in
In other words, if angle θ formed between the top surface of lower blade 4 and metal foil base material W lying over face sheet 10 and cutting edge 4a as shown in
As has been explained on
On the precondition that face sheet 10 is fixed at a location about 0.5 mm (as a certain distance α) farther than the position of cutting edge 4a of the lower blade 4 side, a 90% or greater sheared plane ratio (an index of cutting quality) should be ensured if the thickness β of face sheet 10 of the lower blade 4 side ranges from 50 to 100 μm and if angle θ is not larger than 12°. These conditions are considered to be also applicable to face sheet 11 of the pad 7 side.
The second embodiment not only provides the same effect as the above-mentioned first embodiment provides but also brings the advantage of achieving a desired result even if angle θ formed between the top surface of lower blade 4 and metal foil base material W lying over face sheet 10 and cutting edge 4a is relatively large.
Although the above embodiments have been described by reference to a case of cutting the multilayered metal foil base material W while keeping its multilayered state, the number of multilayered sheets are not particularly limited as far as the cutting quality is guaranteed. Moreover, a pattern where cutting is conducted on metal foil base material W having only one layer is also acceptable.
The primary function of face sheets 10, 11 serving as holding devices in the above-mentioned embodiments is to generate a relatively great frictional force against metal foil base material W. So long as this requirement is satisfied, face sheets 10, 11 are not necessarily limited to a resin product formed of polypropylene, polyethylene or the like. For example, face sheets 10, 11 may be an elastic product such as rubber. In this case face sheets 10, 11 formed of elastic material is positively subjected to elastic deformation due to the pressing force, thereby bringing the advantage of generating a greater frictional force.
Furthermore, it is also possible to employ an iron-based sheet or a nonferrous metal sheet as face sheets 10, 11, in which case the surfaces thereof may be formed to have a rough shape attaining a desired frictional force, such as a satin shape or an uneven shape. With such a rough shape, it becomes possible to generate a desired frictional force against metal foil base material W.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2013-202867 | Sep 2013 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2014/068993 | 7/17/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/045580 | 4/2/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4002092 | Smith | Jan 1977 | A |
5458717 | Kurita | Oct 1995 | A |
7430951 | Li | Oct 2008 | B1 |
8911166 | Tsukada | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20030029288 | Golovashchenko | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050211032 | Liu | Sep 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101954800 | Jan 2011 | CN |
102012011767 | Nov 2013 | DE |
0323673 | Jul 1989 | EP |
57184617 | Nov 1982 | JP |
2004058180 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2007152436 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007216293 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007237324 | Sep 2007 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160214266 A1 | Jul 2016 | US |