1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to superabrasive cutting elements, inserts, or compacts, for abrasive cutting of rock and other hard materials. More particularly, the invention pertains to improved interfacial geometries for polycrystalline diamond compacts (PDCs) used in drill bits, reamers, and other downhole tools used to form a borehole in a subterranean formation.
2. Background of Related Art
Drill bits for oil field drilling, mining and other uses typically comprise a metal body into which cutting elements are incorporated. Such cutting elements, also known in the art as inserts, compacts, buttons, and machining tools, are typically manufactured by forming a superabrasive layer on the end of a sintered or cemented tungsten carbide substrate. As an example, polycrystalline diamond, or other suitable superabrasive material, such as cubic boron nitride, may be sintered onto the surface of a cemented carbide substrate under ultra-high pressure and ultra-high temperature to form a PDC, or other polycrystalline compact. During this process, a sintering aid such as cobalt may be premixed with the powdered diamond or swept from the substrate into the diamond table. The sintering aid also acts as a continuous bonding phase between the diamond table and substrate.
Because of different coefficients of thermal expansion and bulk modulus, large residual stresses of varying magnitudes, at different locations, may remain in the cutting element following cooling and release of pressure. These complex stresses are concentrated near the superabrasive table/substrate interface. Depending upon the cutting element construction, the direction of any applied forces, and the particular location within the cutting element under scrutiny, the stresses may be either compressive, tensile, shear, or mixtures thereof. In the superabrasive table/substrate interface configuration, any nonhydrostatic compressive or tensile load exerted on the cutting element produces shear stresses. Residual stresses at the interface between the superabrasive table and substrate may result in failure of the cutting element upon cooling or in subsequent use under thermal stress and applied forces, especially with respect to large-diameter cutting elements. These manufacturing-induced stresses are complex and are of a nonuniform nature and thus often undesirably place the superabrasive table of the cutting element into tension at locations along the superabrasive table/substrate interface.
During drilling operations, cutting elements may be subjected to very high forces in various directions, and the superabrasive layer may fracture, delaminate, spall, or fail due to the combination of drilling-induced stresses as well as residual stresses much sooner than would be initiated by normal abrasive wear of the superabrasive layer. Because a tendency toward premature failure of the superabrasive layer and failure at the superabrasive table/substrate interface may be augmented by the presence of high residual stresses in the cutting element, many attempts have been made to provide PDC cutting elements which are resistant to premature failure. For instance, the use of an interfacial transition layer with material properties intermediate of those of the superabrasive table and substrate is known within the art. Also, the formation of cutting elements with noncontinuous grooves or recesses in the substrate filled with superabrasive material is also practiced, as are cutting element structures having interfacial concentric circular grooves or a spiral groove.
The patent literature reveals a variety of cutting element designs in which the superabrasive table/substrate interface is three dimensional, i.e., the superabrasive layer and/or substrate have portions which protrude into the other member.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,351,772 of Smith shows various patterns of radially directed interfacial structures on the substrate surface; the formations project into the superabrasive surface. More particularly, a cutting element interface having inner spokes that radially extend circumferentially between outer spokes is shown in
As shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,486,137 of Flood et al., the interfacial superabrasive surface has a pattern of unconnected radial members which project into the substrate; the thickness of the superabrasive layer decreases toward the central axis of the cutting element.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,590,728 of Matthias et al. describes a variety of interface patterns in which a plurality of unconnected straight and arcuate ribs or small circular areas characterizes the superabrasive table/substrate interface.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,605,199 of Newton teaches the use of ridges at the interface which are parallel or radial, and includes a ring of greater thickness than the remaining superabrasive table proximate the radial periphery thereof.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,709,279 of Dennis, the superabrasive table/substrate interface is shown to be a repeating sinusoidal surface about the axial center of the cutting element.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,871,060 of Jensen et al., assigned to the assignee hereof, shows cutting element interfaces having various ovaloid or round projections. The interface surface is indicated to be regular or irregular and may include surface grooves formed during or following sintering. A cutting element substrate is depicted having a rounded interface surface with a combination of radial and concentric circular grooves formed in the interface surface of the substrate.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,026,919 of Thigpen et al. discloses, in
U.S. Pat. No. 6,315,067 of Fielder discloses, in
U.S. Pat. No. 6,571,891 to Smith et al., assigned to the assignee of the present invention and the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its entirety, discloses concentric ring structures formed in a substrate of a cutting element, wherein the members comprising the ring structures are substantially circumferentially aligned. Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 6,739,417 to Smith et al., assigned to the assignee of the present invention and the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its entirety, discloses concentric ring structures formed in a substrate, including a substantially cylindrical PDC-type substrate having a substantially planar surface and a stud-type substrate having a generally domed surface, of a cutting element, wherein the members comprising the ring structures are substantially circumferentially aligned.
Drilling operations subject the cutting elements on a drill bit to extremely high stresses, often causing crack initiation and subsequent failure of the superabrasive table. Much effort has been devoted by the industry to making cutting elements resistant to rapid deterioration and failure.
Each of the above-indicated references, the disclosures of each of which are hereby incorporated herein, describes three-dimensional superabrasive table/substrate interfacial patterns which may ameliorate certain residual stresses in a cutting element. Nevertheless, the tendencies of the superabrasive table to fracture, defoliate, and delaminate remain. Accordingly, an improved cutting element having enhanced resistance to such stress-induced degradation is needed in the industry.
The present invention comprises a drill bit cutting element having a superabrasive table/substrate interface which provides enhanced resistance to fracture, defoliation, and delamination of the superabrasive table. The invention also provides a cutting element with a substrate and superabrasive table configuration which helps to separate, distribute, or isolate areas of residual stress within the interfacial area.
The present invention comprises a cutting element having a superabrasive layer of table overlying and attached to a substrate. The interface between the superabrasive layer and the substrate is configured to enable optimization of the nature, magnitude, and characteristics of residual stresses within the superabrasive table. The interface surface preferably incorporates a three-dimensional interface having a first ring pattern comprising a plurality of circumferentially arranged raised sections which are separated by a plurality of radially extending grooves. Also, the interface configuration includes at least a second ring pattern comprising a plurality of circumferentially arranged raised sections which are separated by a plurality of radially extending grooves. The inner raised sections may substantially circumferentially overlap with the outer grooves, while the inner grooves may substantially circumferentially overlap with the outer sections. Such a relationship between the raised sections and grooves of radially adjacent ring patterns, as used herein, is termed “substantially circumferentially misaligned.”
Accordingly, the present invention contemplates a cutting element including a substrate, the interfacial surface of the cutting element having one or more smaller ring patterns formed by raised sections disposed within one or more larger ring patterns formed by raised sections, where the radially adjacent ring patterns are substantially circumferentially misaligned. The raised sections may be configured with varying geometries, as may the grooves separating the raised sections.
It should also be understood that the advantages of the present invention may be achieved by causing the interfacial surfaces as described above to form upon or within either the substrate or the superabrasive table. Since diamond powder is normally applied to the substrate prior to the ultra high pressure, ultra high temperature process of fabrication of a PDC cutting element, the substrate would normally possess the inverse of the geometry desired to be formed by the superabrasive table. Since the residual stresses that develop within the superabrasive table and carbide are, to some extent, related to one another, it would be apparent that the inverse of a particular interfacial surface may ameliorate, distribute, reduce, or increase the residual stresses that develop within both the substrate, superabrasive table, or both, in response to bonding and cooling during the manufacture of a cutting element by separating, or beneficially distributing, residual stress fields.
In a further embodiment of the present invention, the interfacial surface of the substrate or superabrasive table associated therewith may include at least one ring pattern that comprises an odd number of sections. Such a configuration may reduce symmetry and distribute symmetrical stress fields in the substrate, the superabrasive table associated therewith, or both.
Also, various constructions or definitions of radially extending grooves separating raised sections may be utilized. Moreover, the ring patterns may be concentric, nonconcentric, substantially circular, ring-like, or elliptical. Further, the substrate interface surface or superabrasive interface surface may be dome-shaped, hemispherically shaped, or otherwise arcuately shaped.
The present invention also includes tools for drilling a borehole in a subterranean formation including at least one cutting element of the present invention. Particularly, the present invention contemplates that a rotary drill bit may include at least one cutting element according to the present invention. As used herein, the term “rotary drill bit” includes and encompasses full-hole bits, core bits, roller-cone bits, fixed-cutter bits, eccentric bits, bicenter bits, reamers, reamer wings, or other earth boring tools as known in the art.
The foregoing and other advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon review of the following detailed description and drawings, which illustrate various embodiments of the invention and are not necessarily drawn to scale, wherein:
The several illustrated embodiments of the invention depict various features which may be incorporated into a drill bit cutting element in a variety of combinations.
The invention comprises a superabrasive cutting element 20 such as a polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) which has a particular three-dimensional interface 38 between superabrasive, or diamond, table 12 and substrate 10. The interface 38 between the superabrasive layer or table 12 and the substrate 10 may be configured to enable optimization of the residual stresses of the superabrasive table 12 by the substrate 10.
As depicted in
The interfacial surfaces 32 and 30, when taken together, are considered to be the interface 38 between superabrasive table 12 and substrate 10. The interface 38 may be generally nonplanar, i.e., having three-dimensional characteristics, and includes portions of superabrasive table 12 which extend into and are accommodated by substrate 10, and vice versa, since each comprises complementary features in relation to the other. In other words, any irregularity, or three-dimensional configuration, at the interface 38 may be looked upon as both a projection, or protrusion, of the substrate into the superabrasive table and the inverse, i.e., a projection, or protrusion, of the superabrasive table into the substrate. Therefore, if one defines the interfacial surface of one of the superabrasive table or substrate, the other interfacial surface of the substrate or superabrasive table, is simply the inverse, complementary shape thereof.
Substrate 10 includes a region 26 which is raised in relation to radially outer lip 25. Raised region 26 may, correspondingly, form an edge 13 of superabrasive table 12 that exhibits an increased thickness, or, alternatively, substrate 10 may not include a difference in elevation between the area of the raised region 26 and the area of the outer lip 25. The interfacial surface 30 of the substrate 10 is shown in
As may be seen in reference to
It should be noted that the cross-sectional views shown in
Of course, inner raised sections 24 and outer raised sections 22 may comprise other geometries and configurations as well. For instance, inner raised sections 24 and outer raised sections 22 may exhibit varying radial width (meaning a measurement radially across the area shown in
In another embodiment of the present invention,
Substrate 60 may include a region 56 which is raised in relation to radially outer lip 55. Raised region 56 may, correspondingly, form an edge 43 of superabrasive table 62 that exhibits an increased thickness, or, alternatively, substrate 60 may not include a difference in elevation between the area of the raised region 56 and the area of the outer lip 55. The interfacial surface 61 of the substrate 60 is shown in
The radially extending outer grooves 53 associated with the outer ring pattern 70 and the radially extending inner grooves 57 associated with the inner ring pattern 66 are circumferentially misaligned in relation to one another. Thus, the inner raised sections 54 substantially circumferentially overlap with the radially extending outer grooves 53, while the radially extending inner grooves 57 substantially circumferentially overlap, in a generally radial direction, with the outer raised sections 52. Thus, the respective raised sections 52 and 54 and radially extending grooves 53 and 57 of radially adjacent ring patterns 70 and 66 are substantially circumferentially misaligned. Such a configuration may ameliorate, distribute, or reduce the residual stresses that develop within both the substrate 60 as well as the superabrasive table 62 in response to bonding and cooling during the manufacture of cutting element 50. In addition, such a configuration may enhance the bonding strength between the substrate 60 and the superabrasive table 62.
The substrate 60 and/or superabrasive table 62, aside from the at least two circumferentially misaligned ring patterns, may be of any cross-sectional configuration, or shape, including circular, polygonal, and irregular. Accordingly, as known in the art, the superabrasive table 62 may include one or more chamfers or buttress geometries formed on the outer radial region thereof. In addition, the superabrasive table 62 may have a cutting face 64 which is flat, rounded, or of any other suitable configuration.
As can now be appreciated, a cutting element interface embodying the present invention provides enhanced resistance to fracture, spalling, and delamination of the superabrasive table, or compact.
Therefore, the present invention comprises at least one inner ring pattern disposed within another ring pattern wherein the outer raised sections are aligned with inner grooves and inner raised sections are aligned with outer grooves. Further, preferably, the number of inner sections, outer sections, inner grooves, and outer grooves may be the same and may be an odd number. An odd number of raised sections comprising each ring pattern may be advantageous, particularly for reducing symmetry. Symmetrical stress patterns generally may develop within a substantially cylindrical superabrasive table and substantially cylindrical substrate that are bonded to one another. Even if the superabrasive table and substrate interfacial surfaces are nonplanar, nonplanar geometries that are symmetric about the longitudinal axis as well as another axis or plane, for instance, a cross-section through the cutting element, perpendicular to the cutting face thereof which divides the cutting element in half, may retain or form stress fields that are a product of, at least partially, such symmetry. A configuration including one or more smaller ring patterns disposed within one or more larger ring patterns wherein radially adjacent ring patterns are circumferentially misaligned may have a propensity to separate or beneficially distribute residual stresses which develop, at least partially, in response to symmetry, particularly if the number of raised sections in each ring pattern is odd. Put another way, such a configuration may reduce symmetry of the residual stress field, which may reduce the maximum and minimum stresses within either of the substrate and superabrasive table. Such a stress state may be preferable within a cutting element to resist fracturing, defoliation, or delamination during use thereof. It should be understood, however, that the present invention is not limited to ring patterns with an odd number of sections, but rather, only that such a configuration may be preferable. Another preferable ring pattern configuration that may tend to separate or distribute the symmetry of stress fields within the cutting element may be radially adjacent, circumferentially misaligned ring patterns wherein one ring pattern contains an even number of raised sections and one ring pattern contains an odd number of sections. Conversely, there may be configurations that exhibit sufficient separation or distribution of residual stress fields despite including ring patterns including an even number of sections. Therefore, in general, any circumferentially misaligned ring pattern of the present invention may comprise an even or odd number of sections, without limitation.
Illustratively, an equal number of raised sections in each ring pattern, equal sizing of each raised section, or equal spacing of each raised section in relation to other raised sections within each ring pattern is not required to accomplish substantially circumferential misalignment according to the present invention. As shown in
It should further be understood that a cutting element according to the present invention may include more than two ring patterns. For instance, a cutting element of the present invention may include a substrate that exhibits three ring patterns, wherein at least two radially adjacent ring patterns are substantially circumferentially misaligned.
As yet another embodiment, a cutting element according to the present invention may include at least one ring pattern having an odd number of sections. For instance,
To further illustrate substantially circumferentially misaligned configurations,
Similarly, turning to
Of course, each of the substrates 110, 210 and 250, as described above, may be preferably employed to form a cutting element including a superabrasive table with an interfacial surface having mutually complementary but reverse features. Such a cutting element, in effect, may provide the previously described residual stress mitigation, distribution, or separation benefits of the at least one ring pattern disposed within at least another ring pattern wherein radially adjacent ring patterns are substantially circumferentially misaligned, as exhibited by the cutting elements illustrated in the drawings and described herein.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention,
In yet a further embodiment of the present invention, as shown in
While the above embodiments are described in terms of sections that protrude or extend from the substrate, similar advantages may be achieved by forming the interfacial surfaces as described above as extending from the superabrasive table, or, put another way, by forming the inverse of the interfacial surfaces, described in the embodiments above, into the substrate. Since diamond powder is normally applied to the substrate prior to the ultra high pressure, ultra high temperature process of fabrication of a PDC cutting element, geometric features may be formed into or onto the substrate in order to cause the superabrasive table to be formed accordingly. Since the residual stresses that develop within the superabrasive table and carbide are, to some extent, related to one another, it would be apparent that such a configuration may ameliorate, distribute, or reduce the residual stresses that develop within both the substrate as well as the superabrasive table in response to bonding and cooling during the manufacture of a cutting element by separating or distributing residual stress fields. While such a configuration may not produce identical stress fields as if the pattern were formed as extending from the substrate rather than into the substrate, since the mechanical behavior of diamond (or any superabrasive material generally) and the substrate may be largely different from one another, the overall effect, however, may be similar to the desired residual stress states described hereinabove.
Therefore, for completeness, one example of an embodiment of the present invention wherein the superabrasive table exhibits at least two ring patterns that are circumferentially misaligned is shown in
As shown in
As yet a further aspect of the present invention, although interfacial surfaces including ring patterns according to the present invention are shown hereinabove as being formed upon or within a generally planar, or flat, substrate surface or end, the present invention is not so limited. For instance, the configuration of the substrate interface surface may be dome-shaped, hemispherically shaped, or otherwise arcuate in shape such as the interfacial ends of substrates 470 and 471 of cutting elements 450 and 451, respectively illustrated in
More specifically,
As noted above, similar advantages may be achieved by forming the interfacial surfaces as described above on the superabrasive table, or, put another way, by forming the inverse of the interfacial surfaces, depicted in the embodiments above, into the substrate. Accordingly,
In addition, the present invention includes a tool for drilling a borehole into a subterranean formation, such as, for instance, a rotary drill bit. In
Although specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and have been described in detail herein, the invention may be susceptible to various modifications, combinations, and alternative forms. Therefore, it should be understood that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention includes all modifications, equivalents, combinations, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4109737 | Bovenkerk | Aug 1978 | A |
RE32036 | Dennis | Nov 1985 | E |
4558753 | Barr | Dec 1985 | A |
4593777 | Barr | Jun 1986 | A |
4604106 | Hall et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4660659 | Short, Jr. et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4679639 | Barr et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4764434 | Aronsson et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4811801 | Salesky et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4858707 | Jones et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4987800 | Gasan et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4997049 | Tank et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5016718 | Tandberg | May 1991 | A |
5120327 | Dennis | Jun 1992 | A |
5154245 | Waldenstrom et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5158148 | Keshavan | Oct 1992 | A |
5248006 | Scott et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5273125 | Jurewicz | Dec 1993 | A |
5304342 | Hall, Jr. et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5335738 | Waldenstrom et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5351772 | Smith | Oct 1994 | A |
5355969 | Hardy et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5379854 | Dennis | Jan 1995 | A |
5435403 | Tibbitts | Jul 1995 | A |
5437343 | Cooley et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5460233 | Meany et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5472376 | Olmstead et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5484330 | Flood et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5486137 | Flood et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5494477 | Flood et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5499688 | Dennis | Mar 1996 | A |
5544713 | Dennis | Aug 1996 | A |
5566779 | Dennis | Oct 1996 | A |
5590728 | Matthias et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5590729 | Cooley et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5605199 | Newton | Feb 1997 | A |
5617928 | Matthias et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5647449 | Dennis | Jul 1997 | A |
5649604 | Fuller et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5706906 | Jurewicz et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5709279 | Dennis | Jan 1998 | A |
5711702 | Devlin | Jan 1998 | A |
5758733 | Scott et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5823277 | Delwiche et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5862873 | Matthias et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5871060 | Jensen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875862 | Jurewicz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887580 | Eyre | Mar 1999 | A |
5890552 | Scott et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5906246 | Mensa-Wilmot et al. | May 1999 | A |
5928071 | Devlin | Jul 1999 | A |
5967249 | Butcher | Oct 1999 | A |
5971087 | Chaves | Oct 1999 | A |
6003623 | Miess | Dec 1999 | A |
6026919 | Thigpen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6041875 | Rai et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6065554 | Taylor et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068071 | Jurewicz | May 2000 | A |
6082474 | Matthias | Jul 2000 | A |
6135219 | Scott | Oct 2000 | A |
6189634 | Bertagnolli et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196340 | Jensen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199645 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202771 | Scott et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6227319 | Radford | May 2001 | B1 |
6241036 | Lovato et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6315066 | Dennis | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315067 | Fielder | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6408959 | Bertagnolli et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6412580 | Chaves | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6527069 | Meiners et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6571891 | Smith et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6739417 | Smith et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 356 097 | Nov 1994 | EP |
2 300 208 | Oct 1996 | GB |
2 316 698 | Apr 1998 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060021802 A1 | Feb 2006 | US |