The present invention relates to cutting tools and inserts having an internal cooling mechanism.
It is known in the art to provide a cooling fluid to a cutting interface between a cutting tool and a workpiece during a cutting operation. The provision of the cooling fluid allows reducing the heat generated at the cutting interface during the cutting operation and thereby preventing damage to both the cutting edge and the workpiece.
In general, a cutting tool has a rake face and a relief face, defining at the intersection thereof a cutting edge of the cutting tool. Cooling fluid is generally provided directly to the cutting interface either from the side of the rake face or from the side of the relief face or from both.
In some examples, cutting inserts used in cutting tools are preformed with apertures configured for the provision of a cooling fluid. In other examples, cutting tools and/or cutting tool holders are provided with a cooling arrangement separate from the cutting insert, which is configured for provision of the cooling fluid.
Examples of cooling arrangements as discussed above are disclosed, for example, in EP0791420, U.S. Pat. No. 5,346,335, U.S. Pat. No. 5,775,854, U.S. Pat. No. 5,901,623, U.S. Pat. No. 6,705,805, U.S. Pat. No. 7,634,957, U.S. Pat. No. 7,934,891 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,959,384. Another example is WO12070046 to the applicant.
Acknowledgement of the above references herein is not to be inferred as meaning that these are in any way relevant to the patentability of the presently disclosed subject matter.
According to one aspect of the subject matter of the present application, there is provided a cutting element having a front face, an opposite rear face and at least one side face extending therebetween, said cutting element comprising a cooling cavity defined by a cavity surface, and at least one shell-like cutting zone defined by an external surface and an internal surface, the external surface being constituted by a cutting edge defined at the intersection between the front face and the at least one side face and corresponding rake and relief surfaces constituted by portions of the front fact and at least one side face respectively, and the internal surface being constituted by a portion of the cavity surface, wherein the maximal distance between the cavity surface and the external surface at the cutting zone is considerably smaller than the distance between the front face and the opposite rear face, said cooling cavity being configured for receiving therein a cooling fluid for cooling said inner surface and thereby withdrawing heat from the cutting edge.
The definition of ‘shell-like’ refers to the fact that the cutting zone is formed of a relatively thin shell owing to a hollow structure of the cutting element. In particular, the ratio between the maximal distance between the cavity surface and the external surface and the distance between the front face and its opposing rear face can be in the range of 1:5 to 1:10.
More specifically, the maximal distance between the cavity surface and the external surface ranges between 0.2-1 mm, more particularly between 0.3-0.9 mm, even more particularly between 0.4-0.8 mm and still more particularly between 0.5-0.7 mm.
According to one example, the cavity surface can be sloped towards the cutting zone in order to direct cooling fluid entering the cavity towards the cutting zone. The arrangement can be such that, in operation, cooling fluid entering the cavity is configured to impact the sloped cavity surface and directed to flow towards the cutting zone so as to cool down the cutting edge from its internal side.
According to one design embodiment, the cavity surface can be formed with a rib array extending along the cutting zone. In particular, said rib array can comprise rake ribs extending generally parallel to the rake surface and relief ribs extending generally parallel to the relief surface.
The ribs of the rib array can provide, inter alia, for at least one of the following:
In particular, it is appreciated that the ribs provide the shell-like structure of the cutting zone, which is considerably thinner than in a standard, non-hollow insert (full of material at the cutting zone) with the required mechanical integrity to withstand the loads exerted on the cutting element during a cutting operation.
It is also appreciated that the jagged design of the ribs yields that some points of the cavity surface are closer to the cutting edge than others. Thus, while the average shell-thickness can be T (an average of the distances of all points on the cavity surface at the cutting zone from the cutting edge), some points along the cavity surface at the cutting zone are extremely close to the cutting edge, with a thickness t<T. This provides for considerable efficiency in the cooling of the cutting edge without deteriorating mechanical integrity of the cutting zone.
In other words, in a corresponding structure having a smoother cavity surface at the same average thickness T, the cooling efficiency would be lesser than in the above described example and the mechanical integrity may be lesser as well.
The arrangement can be such that the cooling fluid provided to the cavity is configured for cooling the cutting edge from the side of the cavity surface. In particular, cooling fluid provided into the cooling cavity is configured, by virtue of the geometry of the cavity so as not to come into direct contact with the cutting edge.
According to one example, each cutting edge of the cutting element can have a corresponding cooling cavity. Alternatively, the majority of said cutting element can be hollow, comprising a single cooling cavity facilitating cooling for all cutting edges of the cutting element.
In addition, it is appreciated that, on the one hand, the smaller the height of the cutting element (i.e. the distance between the front face and the rear face), the stronger the cutting element since the cutting edge is elevated over a smaller hollow area. On the other hand, the lesser the height of the cutting element, the lesser the space for cooling fluid to flow. Thus, the geometry of the cutting element and of the cavity can be such that meet the required cooling on the one hand while meeting mechanical integrity requirements on the other.
In particular, the following differences should be noted between different cutting operations:
Milling—the cutting edge keeps coming in and out of contact with the workpiece. As a result, when it is in contact with the workpiece the cutting edge heats up, whereas when it is out of contact, the cutting edge cools down. However, this constant motion in and out of the workpiece causes the milling insert to be repeatedly ‘impacted’ by the workpiece, requiring sufficient mechanical robustness and stability. In such case, it may be beneficial to provide a more robust structure of the cutting element by using a configuration in which each cutting zone is provided with its individual cooling cavity;
Turning—the cutting edge remains within the workpiece throughout the cutting operation, whereby the effect of ‘impact’ by the workpiece, which occurs in milling, is eliminated. However, since the cutting edge is constantly in contact with the workpiece, it constantly heats up, requiring sufficient cooling to prevent mechanical damage to the cutting insert.
In addition, the front face of the cutting element can be formed with at least one drainage outlet being in fluid communication with the cooling cavity, and wherein the discharge outlet is arranged such that cooling fluid discharged therethrough does not come in contact with the cutting edge.
According to another aspect of the subject matter of the present application, there is provided a cutting tool comprising:
wherein, a cooling cavity of the cutting element is aligned with said inlet and said outlet, whereby cooling fluid is configured for being provided into the cooling cavity via said inlet and be withdrawn therefrom via said outlet.
In reference to the above, the base surface can be provided with a ramp element configured, when the cutting tool is assembled and the cutting element is mounted onto the base surface, to protrude into the cavity of the cutting element to thereby define a fluid path. Specifically, the fluid path can be configured for receiving cooling fluid through said inlet, directing it towards the portion of the cavity surface at the cutting zone and then towards said outlet. According to a specific example, the cross-sectional area of the fluid path can decrease towards the cutting zone.
According to one design, the base surface can be unitary with the cutting tool holder. Alternatively, according to another design, the cutting tool holder can comprise an intermediate base plate formed with said base surface.
The intermediate base plate can be provided with an inlet bore aligned with the inlet of the cutting tool holder and the cooling cavity of the cutting element and an outlet bore aligned with the outlet of the cutting tool holder and the cooling cavity of the cutting element, to allow passage of cooling fluid therethrough.
The cutting tool can be a milling tool comprising a plurality of cutting elements mounted thereto, wherein said outlet has an open end at a rear portion of the seat so as to direct cooling fluid discharged from the outlet towards a subsequent cutting element of the milling tool.
According to still another aspect of the subject matter of the present application, there is provided a cutting tool holder for mounting thereon a cutting element to form a cutting tool, said cutting tool holder comprising a seat portion having a base surface onto which said cutting element is to be mounted, said base surface being provided with a fluid inlet for providing cooling fluid to the seat portion and a fluid outlet configured for removing cooling fluid from the seat portion.
In addition, the following points should be noted:
The cavity of the cutting element can be formed at an angle to the cutting edge. I particular, it can be angled at 45° to a top or bottom surface of the cutting element. The insert bore, in turn, can be angled to a top and bottom surface thereof and configured for receiving therein a fastening member in a direction generally perpendicular to the top and bottom surface.
The cutting insert can have a first portion and a second portion, angled at about 135° with respect to each other.
The cutting element can comprise a flow channel at the top surface thereof, configured for concentrating fluid flow towards the cutting edge. An outlet of the flow channel can be located below the top surface, and a top surface of the cutting element can be of angled configuration while a bottom surface thereof is generally flat.
The cutting element can be configured for performing a drilling operation or mounting onto a tool holder to form a drilling tool configured for performing a drilling operation.
Specifically, the drilling element can comprise an outlet configured for emitting a cooling fluid to cool the cutting edge, wherein cooling is aided by centrifugal forces caused by rotation of the drilling tool itself.
In effect, centrifugal forces facilitate emission of the cooling fluid towards the cutting edge while rotation of the drilling tool with respect to a bottom surface of the workpiece allows the workpiece to remove cooling fluid away from the cutting edge.
In order to better understand the subject matter that is disclosed herein and to exemplify how it may be carried out in practice, embodiments will now be described, by way of non-limiting example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Turning to
With particular reference being made to
The seat portion 20 has a bottom face 22 configured for positioning thereon of the base plate 30, and is delimited by two side walls 24. The bottom face 22 is formed with an auxiliary bore 27 configured for receiving therein an auxiliary securing bolt 80 for fastening of the base plate 30 into the seat 20, and a main bore 25 configured for receiving therein a main securing bolt 70 for fastening of the cutting insert 50 into the seat 20.
The seat portion 20 is also formed with an cooling inlet 26 configured for emitting the cooling fluid provided through the channel 16, and an outlet 28 configured for removal of the cooling fluid from the area of the seat portion 20.
Turning now to
The base plate 30 further comprises an inlet hole 36 and an outlet hole 38 which, when the base plate 30 is mounted into the seat portion 20 of the cutting tool holder 10, are aligned with the respective inlet and outlet 26, 28 of the cutting tool holder 10.
The base plate 30 further comprises a fluid ramp 40 projecting from the top surface 32T thereof, disposed between the inlet 36 and the outlet 38, and configured for directing the flow of the cooling fluid towards a designated area of the cutting insert 50.
In particular, as shown in
Attention is now drawn to
In addition, the cutting insert 50 comprises four cooling cavities 60, each associated with a respective cutting edge 54. Each cooling cavity has an inner space 62 delimited by side walls and a ramp 64, tapering away from the cutting edge 54. The inner surface of the cavity provides each cutting corner of the cutting insert 50 with a shell-like geometry (a thin-walled structure) which has an external, operational surface (comprising the cutting edge 54) and an internal, cooling surface constituted by the surface of the cavity 60.
It is observed that the cooling surface is formed with an array of ribs, including rake ribs 66 which extend generally parallel to the rake surface 56 and relief ribs 68 which extend generally parallel to the relief surface 58. With particular reference to
Turning to
It is also noted that the geometry of ribs (as opposed to a straight wall) provides for a much stronger construction, allowing the pocket 60 to be even closer to the cutting edge 54, i.e. provide a smaller thickness between the external, operative surface and internal, cooling surface (as small as 0.5 mm).
In operation, during cutting of a workpiece (not shown), the cutting edge 54 heats up due to constant friction with the workpiece. This heat, reduction of which is usually facilitated by providing a cooling fluid directly to the cutting edge, propagates towards the center of the cutting insert 50 so that the body 52 of the cutting insert 50 becomes a heat accumulator.
In order to mitigate this effect, the arrangement according to the subject matter of the present application allows cooling the inner portion of the cutting zone of the cutting insert 50 thereby facilitating both increased cooling of the cutting edge 54 (external cooling is used anyway, though not shown here) and cooling of the body 52 of cutting insert 50 itself.
With additional reference being made to
The above described cutting insert 50 is configured for both milling and turning operations. In this regards, the following differences should be noted between these two operations:
Milling—the cutting edge keeps coming in and out of contact with the workpiece. As a result, when it is in contact with the workpiece the cutting edge heats up, whereas when it is out of contact, the cutting edge cools down. However, this constant motion in and out of the workpiece causes the milling insert to be repeatedly ‘impacted’ by the workpiece, requiring sufficient mechanical robustness and stability;
Turning—the cutting edge remains within the workpiece throughout the cutting operation, whereby the effect of ‘impact’ by the workpiece, which occurs in milling, is eliminated. However, since the cutting edge is constantly in contact with the workpiece, it constantly heats up, requiring sufficient cooling to prevent mechanical damage to the cutting insert.
The above described cutting insert 50 provides both for sufficient mechanical integrity to withstand a milling operation as well as sufficient heat removal space for the cooling fluid.
Turning now to
Attention is now drawn to
The only difference between the cutting tool 1′ and cutting tool 1′ lies in that the outlets 28, 38 of the cutting tool holder 10′ and base plate 30′ respectively, are in the shape of open channels.
Specifically, the heated cooling fluid emitted from the pocket 60 of the cutting insert 50 does not pass through a closed channel as shown in cutting tool 1, but rather through an open channel 38′, 28′ as shown in the above Figs.
The open channel configuration allows increasing the flow rate of the cooling fluid W by increasing the drainage rate of the cooling fluid.
Turning now to
In the present example, the seat portion 20″ of the cutting tool holder 10″ comprises one inlet 26″ located at the proximity of the working corner and two outlets 28″ located spaced therefrom.
Respectively, the base plate 30″ comprises an inlet 36″ configured to be aligned with the inlet 26″ and two outlets 38″ spaced therefrom and configured for being aligned with the outlets 28″. Contrary to the previously described example, the base plate 30″ does not comprise a fluid ramp.
Turning to
Reverting to
It is observed that, as opposed to the previously described example, the cutting insert 50″ of the present example comprises much less material, and is therefore less robust. As a result, it may be that the above cutting insert 50″ is more suitable for turning operation rather than milling.
However, it is noted that the above cutting insert may also be used in milling, in particular, in milling operations in which three corners of the cutting insert 50″ come into contact with the workpiece. In this case, it is appreciated that the cooling fluid W facilitates cooling not only of the main corner towards which the fluid is discharged but also to the adjacent cutting corners due to flow of the cooling fluid towards the evacuation outlets 38″.
Attention is now drawn to
Reduced corner—the cutting insert 50′″ has a chipped-away portion 59′″ at each corner proximal to the bottom face 52B′″, which provides an additional drainage outlet for the cooling fluid during operation, via a formed gap g; and
Additional holes—the top face 52T′″ of the cutting insert 50′″ is provided with four through going drainage holes 57′″ which are configured for facilitating greater removal of cooling fluid from the cutting insert 50′″.
It is noted that the drainage outlet holes 57′″ are not directed to the cutting corner as they are not intended for providing cooling fluid to the external surface of the cutting edge 54′″. To the contrary—the drainage holes 57′″ are only configured for allowing increased evacuation of cooling fluid from the cutting insert 50′″. Thus, it can be posited that the majority of the cooling fluid emitted from the drainage holes 57′″ does not reach the operative cutting corner at all.
Turning to
The male part 130′″ also comprises eight mid-projections 150′″ which are configured for the forming of the ribs disposed along the side of the cutting insert 50′″, between two neighboring corners.
Turning now to
With particular reference being made to
In addition, each seat comprises an inlet 226 configured for provisional cooling fluid into the seat 220 and an outlet 228 configured for removal of cooling fluid therefore. As opposed to the cutting tool 1 previously described, in this case there is no base plate 230, and the seat itself serves as a base plate.
Thus, the seat surface 222 is formed with a ramp element 240 projecting from the seat and has a body 242 with a ramp surface 244, an inlet channel 246 and an outlet channel 248 merging with respective inlet and outlet 226, 228. It is also noted that the outlet channel 228 extends along the seat and has a discharge opening 229 at the rear side of the seat, the purpose of which will not be explained.
Turning to
In this case, the cooling fluid is discharged from the seat 220 via a rear outlet 229. It is noted here that the outlet 229 is arranged such the discharged fluid is aimed at the cutting corner of the subsequent cutting insert 250, so it also serves as an addition to the standard external cooling. However, it is noted that the cooling fluid passing through the seat is not used for external cooling of the cutting edge of the cutting insert mounted into that seat.
Reference is now made to
With reference to
With regards to all of the above cutting inserts 50, 50′, 50″, 50′″ and 250—all can be manufactured in a pressing/sintering process, allowing for convenient mass production of the cutting inserts.
Attention is now drawn to
As observed specifically from
Such an orientation of the insert bore allows forming the cooling cavities 460a, 460b, closer to the cutting edge 454, since the diagonal orientation leaves more material area to be worked with. This, in turn, allows for a more robust structure of the cutting insert, the mechanical integrity of which is not greatly deteriorated due to the forming of the cooling cavity 460a.
With reference being made to
Turning now to
It is observed that the cutting insert 450 produced by the mold 501 is oriented at a 45° angle with respect to the longitudinal axis of the mold (the axis along which the members 510, 530 displaced when pressing). As a result, the cooling cavities 460, which are formed generally along the longitudinal axis, are eventually angled to the cutting edge 454 of the cutting insert 450 and the desired angle.
It is important to note that while the pressing is performed along a pressing axis which extends generally along the longitudinal direction of the male and female member, the operative surfaces of the latter, the ones used to form the top and bottom surfaces of the cutting insert are angled at 45° to the pressing axis, allowing the forming of the cavity at the desired angle.
It is also observed that the female member 530 comprises a side ledge 550 configured for forming the cutting edge of the cutting insert at a location other than the split line at which the male and female members meet during press molding. This yields a side channel 459 formed along two sides of the cutting insert 450.
Turning now to
Similar elements have been designated with similar reference numbers, with the addition of 600 (i.e. cutting insert 650 uses a similar reference number as cutting insert 450, both having cutting edge 454, 654 etc.)
However, contrary to the previous example, the cutting insert 650 comprises two portions which are angled to one another at 135°, yielding that the cooling cavities 660 are generally parallel to one another.
This provides a very important advantage with respect to the pressing process. In particular, contrary to the previous example which required forming the cutting insert at an orientation angled to the pressing axis, in this example, the cutting insert can be formed symmetrically with the pressing axis as the projections forming the cooling cavities extend generally along the pressing axis.
The above yields an angled configuration of the cutting insert itself 650, in this particular example, each portion of the cutting insert is of a triangular shape, the portioned being angled to one another, as shown in
In addition, with particular reference being made to
Reverting back to
The flow channel 659 merges with the chip breaking channel 656 of the cutting insert, allowing fluid flow to reach very close to the cutting edge and, at the same time, lift chips removed from the workpiece during a cutting operation.
Attention is now drawn to
The main differences between the turning tool 601′ and 601 are as follows:
First of all, the holder 610′ is designed with an additional flow channel 618′ and 619′ (
Secondly, the flow channel 659′ is provided with a blocker 651′ which is configured for preventing chips removed from the workpiece by the cutting edge 654′ from flowing towards the outlet 657′ and blocking it. On the other hand, the blocker 651′ has a stream-line design configured for minimally obstructing cooling fluid emitted from the outlet 657′ towards the cutting edge 654′ (see
Contrary to the previously described example 601, the cutting insert 650′ further comprises supports 690 in the form of triangular projections 692′ and 694′, configured for being received with the holder 610′. The arrangement of the supports 692′, 694′ is such that allows the cutting insert 650′ more surface contact with the holder 610′ (compared to the example 601).
Since the bottom surface of the other portion of the cutting insert (the one that, at a given moment, does not perform a cutting operation) is not mated against a base surface of the holder, the supports 692′, 694′ allow preventing a see-saw motion of the cutting insert which could lead to disengagement of between the bottom surface 652B′ of the operational cutting portion and the plate 630′.
Attention is now drawn to
The main difference between the cutting insert 650″ and the previously described cutting insert 650′ lies in the design of the bottom surface of the cutting insert, 652B″. Whereas the previous cutting insert 650′ was shown to has a see-saw configuration, the cutting insert 650″ has a flat bottom surface 652B″.
With particular reference being made to
Attention is now drawn to
The main difference between the cutting tool 601′″ and the cutting tool 601″ lies in the fastening mechanism used to secure the cutting insert 650′″ to the tool holder 610′″. In particular, a clamping mechanism 700 is used, which operates in conjunction with a recess 635′″ of the cutting insert 650′″, contrary to an insert bore as described with respect to the previous examples.
Turning now to
Similar elements have been designated with similar reference numbers, with the addition of 800 (i.e. cutting insert 850 uses a similar reference number as cutting insert 650, both having cutting edge 654, 854 etc.).
The cutting insert 850 is formed with openings along the circumference thereof configured for allowing cooling fluid to flow therein and reach the entire length of the cutting edge 854 of the cutting insert 850.
Cooling fluid is provided through the cutting tool holder 810 and intermediate plate 830, and emitted from outlets O (see
It is noted that the wall of the openings are arrange so as to face the cutting corner of the cutting insert (rather than being perpendicular to the side surfaces 852S of the cutting insert 850).
Turning now to
In addition, as shown in
A first portion of the cooling fluid is directed, similar to cutting tool 601′, back towards the relief surface of the cutting insert 950 via outlet 919b.
A second portion of the cooling fluid is directed backwards to impact the cutting edge of the subsequent milling insert 950, via outlets 918b.
In this manner, cooling fluid usage is somewhat optimized to remove heat not only from the cutting insert to which it is originally directed but from a subsequent cutting insert as well. It is appreciated that the subsequent cutting insert has a cooling mechanism of its own and that a portion of the cooling fluid used therein is directed to a cutting insert subsequent thereto and so on, and so forth.
Attention is now brought to
In the example described herein, as in previous examples, the cooling cavity 1136 almost reaches the cutting edge of the drilling tool, allowing to provide cooling fluid directly to the cutting edge.
However, due to the geometry of the drilling tool (see
In particular, when the drilling tool revolves with respect to the workpiece, the bottom surface of the bore formed in the workpiece constantly carries away with it, during respective turning of the drilling tool, the cooling fluid ‘stuck’ at the dead-end and removes it from the area. This also allows breaking up the boundary layers at the front surface of the drill, allowing for more efficient cooling and fluid flow.
With particular reference to
Those skilled in the art to which this invention pertains will readily appreciate that numerous changes, variations, and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention, mutatis mutandis.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
227228 | Jun 2013 | IL | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IL2014/050573 | 6/26/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/207747 | 12/31/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4544517 | Ohno | Oct 1985 | A |
5237894 | Lindeke | Aug 1993 | A |
5346335 | Harpas et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5775854 | Wertheim | Jul 1998 | A |
5901623 | Hong | May 1999 | A |
6053669 | Lagerberg | Apr 2000 | A |
6705805 | Lagerberg | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7634957 | Ghosh et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7934891 | Jonsson | May 2011 | B2 |
7959384 | Breisch | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7997832 | Prichard et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8328471 | Nelson et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
9656323 | Harif | May 2017 | B2 |
20010007215 | Murata | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020172569 | Nakamura | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20040086415 | Gubanich | May 2004 | A1 |
20040240949 | Pachao-Morbitzer | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20070042217 | Fang | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20100272529 | Rozzi et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110027021 | Nelson | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20130078043 | Henry | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130108383 | Scheicher | May 2013 | A1 |
20130251463 | Harif | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130266681 | Cripps | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140079495 | Chen | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140086695 | Jameson | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150139744 | Harif | May 2015 | A1 |
20170368612 | Imai | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102006034489 | Jan 2008 | DE |
0791420 | Aug 1997 | EP |
333005 | Apr 1991 | JP |
2012070046 | May 2012 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160368061 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |