The present invention relates to the use of high strength/tough carbon nanotube fibers and polymer composites, and more particularly, to an improved apparatus for cutting resin coated carbon assemblages such as fibers and sheets.
Fiber reinforced composites have been utilized in various applications including aerospace, automotive, and high performance sporting goods. Typically, the reinforcement or composite must be cut during processing. In particular, additive manufacturing processes of continuous fiber reinforced composites may utilize automated cutting of the polymer matrix and reinforcement.
A number of devices for cutting filaments have been developed. For example, Mark et al. WIPO Patent Application WO2014/153535 discloses cutting a fiber using a hot or cold knife. Jimenez U.S. Pat. No. 4,984,727, discloses a device for cutting textile filaments. Scharfenberger U.S. Pat. No. 3,763, 561 discloses a device for cutting materials such as glass roving. Becker U.S. Pat. No. 4,538,490 discloses a staple fiber cutter. Jones U.S. Pat. No. 5,500,505 which provides a method for cutting epoxy/carbon fiber composites with lasers. Alexander et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,248,114 which provides an improved apparatus for cutting filamentary tows with a cutting assembly including a plurality of spaced apart knife edges. Sand U.S. Pat. No. 5,873,291 discloses an apparatus having a rotary cutter including a number of knives for cutting fibrous reinforcement material. Nordlin U.S. Pat. No. 6,735,870, Cribbs et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,557,049, and Hasegawa US Patent Application 2013/0255084 disclose cutters for optical fibers. Viniglia US Patent Application 2012/0036977 discloses a motorized head for applying composite material to an application surface. The apparatus includes a cutter and a shear surface for the cutter blade. Lehner U.S. Pat. No. 5,044,235 discloses a filament cutting machine system including a cutter ram and blades. Wadsworth et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,169,398 discloses an apparatus for cutting filamentary material using knife blades against which a material to be cut is wound and then severed by applied pressure. Singer U.S. Pat. No. 2,871,622 discloses an apparatus for severing a length of continuously moving frangible filament into short lengths using a rotating scoring tool. Gregory U.S. Pat. No. 2,356,841 discloses a method for cutting tapered filaments using an electrically-controlled knife. Heffelfinger U.S. Pat. 2,821,253 which provides a fiber cutter that includes a rotatable cutter head or disc with at least one cutting blade attached thereto, and a stationary blade which cooperates with the rotating blades to shear off the fiber or filament supply in a scissor-like manner.
Although numerous devices for cutting fibers and fiber composites have been developed, known devices may suffer from various drawbacks.
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) show promise as multifunctional materials for a range of applications due to their outstanding combination of mechanical, electrical and thermal properties. The measured elastic moduli for CNTs typically range from 1.28 to 1.8 TPa. CNTs have exhibited breaking strengths ranging from 11 to 63 GPa and failure strain of 1.6% under a tensile load. These properties of CNTs make them an ideal reinforcement material for additive manufacturing and other processing. However, the high strength of the CNT reinforcements such as yarns, tapes and sheets makes them very difficult to cut. Continuous CNT reinforced materials typically cannot be readily cut by blades, ultrasonic cutters or shears. The mechanism described herein takes advantage of the electrical, thermal and chemical properties of CNTs and/or other electrically conductive materials to provide a robust cutting method.
One aspect of the present disclosure is a filament cutter that includes a set of blades to score through resin coatings that may be present on the fibers. The filament cutter also utilizes an electrical current to heat and cut the fiber reinforcement and any remaining resin.
The present disclosure provides a filament cutter mechanism and process for cleanly cutting high strength/toughness fibers and polymer fiber composites with minimal blade wear. The filament cutter may be used as part of an additive manufacturing device/process. The filament cutter is fast, compact and requires relatively low power.
The filament cutting mechanism described herein utilizes the electrical conductivity and chemistry of composites to provide a way to effect clean and precise cuts utilizing a low amount of energy. It will be understood that an electrically conductive filament may comprise virtually any conductive filament, including (but not limited to) combinations of one or more of the following: (1) An electrically conductive core with an insulating coating; (2) An insulating matrix doped with electrically conductive fibers and/or particles; and/or (3) An insulating core surrounded by an electrically conductive fiber.
In a process according to the present disclosure, a set of electrically conductive (e.g. metal) blades are connected to an electrical power supply and act as electrodes. The blades are used to isolate a region of the filament to be cut. The blades score and degrade (penetrate) any resin coating on the reinforcement fiber, thereby causing the blades to come into contact with the electrically conductive material of the filament (e.g. carbon fiber), thereby completing an electrical circuit. This completion of the electrical circuit causes a surge of electrical current to flow through the conductive material of the filament in a small region between the blades, causing the conductive material (e.g. carbon fiber) of the filament therein to heat up rapidly.
When an electrical current I flows through conductive materials such as a fiber of electrical resistance R, the power (P=I2R) is dissipated primarily as heat energy. In the case of carbon fibers, the rapid heating of a carbon containing fiber in an oxidizing atmosphere causes its oxidation via the reaction:
C+O2→CO2.
The rapid heating may also cause oxidation of any polymer that is on the fiber surface. Additionally, rapid heating also cause oxidation/vaporization of the carbon fiber and/or the polymer coating.
The products produced by the gaseous reaction drift away and a clean break (gap) is created in the fiber/composite material in between the blades. Because only a small part of the filament is heated, a relative low amount of electrical energy is required for the cut. Additionally, no shearing action is typically required to cut the fibers, thereby reducing or eliminating unintended damage to the fibers that could otherwise be caused by the blades. Still further, because the cutting is solely or in part the result of heating and oxidation rather than mechanical shearing, blade life is increased relative to conventional cutting processes.
These and other features, advantages, and objects of the present invention will be further understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art by reference to the following specification, claims, and appended drawings.
For purposes of description herein, the terms “upper,” “lower,” “right,” “left,” “rear,” “front,” “vertical,” “horizontal,” and derivatives thereof shall relate to the invention as oriented in
With reference to
In use, electric motor 22 is actuated to shift the support block 20 from a retracted position (
A cutting mechanism 1A according to another aspect of the present disclosure is shown in
It will be understood that other mechanical devices such as spring mechanisms, pneumatic devices and manual force (e.g.
With further reference to
In use, a user grasps handles/jaws 54A and 54B, and manually (i.e. by hand) applies a mechanical force to the handles/jaws 54A, 54B to push the blades 52A and 52B towards the support block 62. As blades/electrodes 52A, 52B are pressed into filament 10, degradation (cutting) of the coating 12 causes blades 52A and 52B to come into contact with electrically conductive core 14, thereby causing an electrical current to flow from the power supply 6 through core 14 to cut filament 10 due to heating/oxidation.
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
With further reference to
The nozzle 102 is made of an electrically conductive material (e.g. metal) and forms a first electrode. Outlet opening 118 of nozzle 102 has an outlet diameter that is greater than or equal to the diameter of the filament 110. Plate 106 is also made of an electrically conductive material (e.g. metal), and forms a second electrode. Electrical current is supplied via an electrical power supply 6 that is connected to the electrodes 102, 106. Hole 108 in plate 106 has a minimum diameter “D1” that is greater than a diameter “D” of the filament 110. Hole 108 forms a sharp edge 120 at a bottom 122 of the plate 106. Mechanism 100 is configured so that the nozzle outlet 118 and hole 108 in plate 106 are concentric with the larger diameter D2 of the hole 108 in plate 106 facing the nozzle outlet 118. This allows for cutting of filament 110 to take place regardless of the last printing move direction. Additionally, a vertical distance Z1 between the nozzle 102 and plate 106 is adjustable to thereby adjust a length of filament 110 through which electrical current flows during the cutting operation. The vertical position of nozzle 102 relative to plate 106 can be adjusted such that a lower portion of nozzle 102 is received in hole 108 of plate 106 with lower end 117 of nozzle 102 protruding below lower surface 122 of plate 106.
In use, an end 126 of the filament 110 is first anchored to build platform 104 by applying a force on filament 110 using the plate 106 or lower end 117 of nozzle 102 to clamp an end 126 of filament 110 between plate 106 or lower end 117 of nozzle 102 and a printing substrate 124 on build platform 104. It will be understood that nozzle 102 may be heated to soften/melt the polymer material of filament 110 prior to depositing filament 110 onto build platform 104. During printing, the bottom of plate 106 may be moved a distance Z1 to a position at or above the lower end 117 of nozzle 102. Next, the distance Z1 between the nozzle 102 and plate 106 is adjusted so that nozzle 102 and plate 106 are not touching each other or any other surface which could otherwise cause a short in the circuit, and wherein the bottom 122 of plate 106 is below the lower end 117 of nozzle 102. The filament 110 is then pulled taut by feed mechanism 114 and/or by actuating (moving) the nozzle 102 in the X and/or Y direction relative to the build platform 104 while clamping the filament 110 (e.g. yarn) in place using the feed mechanism 114. Feed mechanism 114 may comprise a standard component of known 3D printers. The tension on filament 110 ensures that good electrical contact is made between the conductive portion (core) of filament 110 and the nozzle 102, as well as between the filament 110 and edge 120 of the plate 106. Electrical current is then supplied to the filament 110 by electrical power source 6 until filament 10 is cut due to oxidation of conductive carbon material and/or melting of polymer material of filament 110. Greater tension on the filament 110 may be provided by keeping filament 110 taut to provide a better connection, thereby reducing the overall resistance of the circuit and allowing for faster cutting. Also, the angles of the filament 110 at each electrode 102, 106 may be adjusted by varying the distance Z1 between the nozzle 102 and the flat plate 106. This adjustment provides control over the location of the cut (separation) during cutting. If the filament angle at the plate 106 is less than the angle at the nozzle 102 (as shown in
Operation of test cutting mechanism 130 is shown in
While the preferred embodiments of the invention have been disclosed in detail it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. Many changes and modifications within the spirit of the invention can be made by those skilled in the art. Such modifications and changes are considered to fall within the scope of the appended claims.
The preceding description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the following claims and the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
All cited patents, patent applications, and other references are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. However, if a term in the present application contradicts or conflicts with a term in the incorporated reference, the term from the present application takes precedence over the conflicting term from the incorporated reference.
All ranges disclosed herein are inclusive of the endpoints, and the endpoints are independently combinable with each other. Each range disclosed herein constitutes a disclosure of any point or sub-range lying within the disclosed range.
The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. “Or” means “and/or.” As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. As also used herein, the term “combinations thereof” includes combinations having at least one of the associated listed items, wherein the combination can further include additional, like non-listed items. Further, the terms “first,” “second,” and the like herein do not denote any order, quantity, or importance, but rather are used to distinguish one element from another. The modifier “about” used in connection with a quantity is inclusive of the stated value and has the meaning dictated by the context (e.g., it includes the degree of error associated with measurement of the particular quantity).
Reference throughout the specification to “another embodiment”, “an embodiment”, “exemplary embodiments”, and so forth, means that a particular element (e.g., feature, structure, and/or characteristic) described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment described herein, and can or cannot be present in other embodiments. In addition, it is to be understood that the described elements can be combined in any suitable manner in the various embodiments and are not limited to the specific combination in which they are discussed.
This patent application claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/251,372, filed on Nov. 5, 2015 and titled “CUTTING MECHANISM FOR CARBON NANOTUBE YARNS, TAPES, SHEETS AND POLYMER COMPOSITES THEREOF,” the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The invention described herein was made in the performance of work under a NASA contract and by an employee of the United States Government and is subject to the provisions of Public Law 96-517 (35 U.S.C. §202) and may be manufactured and used by or for the Government for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or therefore. In accordance with 35 U.S.C. §202, the contractor elected not to retain title.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2356841 | Gregory | Aug 1944 | A |
2544673 | Bernard | Mar 1951 | A |
2871622 | Edward et al. | Feb 1959 | A |
3740517 | Lauer | Jun 1973 | A |
3763561 | Scharfenberger | Oct 1973 | A |
4169398 | Wadsworth et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4248114 | Alexander et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4557049 | Cribbs et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4916278 | Rudd | Apr 1990 | A |
4984727 | Jimenez | Jan 1991 | A |
5044235 | Lehner | Sep 1991 | A |
5121329 | Crump | Jun 1992 | A |
5176028 | Humphrey | Jan 1993 | A |
5429163 | Frenkel | Jul 1995 | A |
5448186 | Kawata | Sep 1995 | A |
5500505 | Jones | Mar 1996 | A |
5873291 | Sand | Feb 1999 | A |
6282950 | Taylor, Jr. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6518330 | White et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6735870 | Sand | May 2004 | B2 |
6934600 | Jang | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7137761 | Hara et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7297304 | Swanson et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7799849 | Raravikar et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8221669 | Batchelder | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8347723 | Questo et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8452073 | Taminger et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
20030236588 | Jang | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050120846 | Ellner | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20090294022 | Hayes et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20120036977 | Vaniglia | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130233471 | Kappesser et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130255084 | Hasegawa et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140061974 | Tyler | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140249773 | Beuth, Jr. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140268604 | Wicker et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140291886 | Mark | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150044383 | Kim | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150108677 | Mark et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150165666 | Butcher | Jun 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Iijima, Sumio, “Hellcal Microtubules of Graphitic Carbon”, Letter to Nature, Nov. 7, 1991, pp. 56-58, vol. 354. |
Dresselhaus Mildred S. et al., Carbon Nanotubes Synthesis, Structures, Properties and Applications (T. W. Ebbesen, Ed 1991) Chapter 2, Relation of Carbon Nanotubes to Other Carbon Materials, Graphite p. 14; Chapter 3, Nanotube Growth and Characterization, p. 29 and Chapter 6, Electronic Properties and Defects, p. 118. |
Koratkar, Nikhil A. et al., “Multifunctional Structural Reinforcement Featuring Carbon Nanotube Films”, Compos. Sci. and Technol. (2003) pp. 1525-1531, vol. 63. |
Atkinson, Ken R. et al., “Multifunctional Carbon Nanotube Yarns and Transparent Sheets: Fabrication, Properties, and Applications”, Physica B (2007) pp. 339-343, vol. 394. |
Qiu, Jingjing et al., “Carbon Nanotube Integrated Multifunctional Multiscale Composites”, Nanotechnology (2007) pp. 1-11, vol. 18, 275708. |
Kaemogebm M. et al., Multifunctional Carbon Nanotube for Fuel Cells, Appl. Phys. Lett. (2008) pp. 094103-1-094103-3, vol. 92, 094103. |
Lee, Woo Il et al., Microwave Curing of Composites, J. Comps. Mater (1984) 387-409, vol. 18, Technomic Publishing Co. |
Dresselhaus, M. S. et al., “Physics of Carbon Nanotubes”, (1995) Carbon, pp. 883-891, vol. 33, No. 7. |
Park, Cheol et al., “Dispersion of Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes by in Situ Polymerization Under Sonication”, Chem. Phys. Lett. (2002) pp. 303-308, vol. 364. |
Thostenson, E. T. et al., “Processing-structure-multi-functional Property Relationship in Carbon Nanotube/epoxy Composites”, (2006) Carbon, pp. 3022-3029 vol. 44. |
Ma, Peng-Cheng et al., “Dispersion and Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes for Polymer-based Nanocomposites: A Review”, Composites Part A (2010) pp. 1345-1367, vol. 41. |
De Volder, Michael F. L. et al. “Carbon Nanotubes: Present and Future Commercial Applications”, Science (2013) pp. 535-539, vol. 339. |
Gurau, Michael, “Part 2: The world's First Commercial All-CNT Sheets, Tape and Yarns”, archived at http://www.nanocomptech.com/blog/need-to-know-part-2-sheets-tape-yarn, accessed Apr. 17, 2016. |
Qunfeng, Cheng et al., “High mechanical performance composite conductor: multi-walled carbon nanotube sheet/bismaleimide nanocomposites”, Adv. Funct. Mater. (2009) pp. 3219-3225, vol. 19. |
Qunfeng, Cheng et al., “Functionalized Carbon-Nanotube Sheet/Bismaleimide Nanocompoites. Mechanical and Electrical Performance Beyond Carbon-Fiber Composites”, Small (2010) pp. 763-767, vol. 6. |
Kim, Jae-Woo et al., “Polyaniline/carbon Nanotube Sheet Nancomposites: Fabrication and Characterization”, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces (2013) pp. 8597-8606, vol. 5. |
Kim, Jae-Woo et al., “Toward High Performance Thermoset/Carbon Nanotube Sheet Nancomposites via Resistive Heating Assisted Infiltration and Cure”, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces (2014) pp. 18832-18843, vol. 6. |
Downs, Rebekah et al., “Strain-Induced Alignment Mechanisms of Carbon Nanotube Networks”, Adv. Eng. Mater. (2015) pp. 349-356, vol. 17. |
Harvey, Stefanie E., “Carbon as Conductor: A Pragmatic Review”, Proceedings of the 61st IWCS Conference (2013) pp. 558-562. |
Behabtu, Natnael et al., “Strong, Light, Multifunctional Fibers of Carbon Nanotube with Ultrahigh Conductivity”, Science (2013) pp. 182-186, vol. 339. |
Bak, David, “Rapid Prototyping of Rapid Production? 3D Printing Processes Move Industry Towards the Latter”, Assembly Automation (2003) pp. 340-345, vol. 23. |
Jones, Rhys. et al., “RepRap-the Replicating Rapid Prototyper”, Robotica (2011) pp. 177-191, vol. 29. |
Espalin, D. et al., “3D Printing Multifunctionality: Structures with Electronics”, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol, (2014) pp. 963-978, vol. 72. |
Tymrak, B. M. et al., “Mechanical Properties of Components Fabricated with Open-source 3-D Printers Under Realistic Environmental Conditions”, Materials & Design (2014) pp. 242-246, vol. 58. |
Garcia-Tunon, E. et al., “Printing in Three Dimensions with Graphene”, Adv. Mater. (2015) pp. 1688-1693, vol. 27. |
Kim, J. H. et al, 3D Printing of Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanowires, Adv. Mater. (2015) pp. 157-161, vol. 27. |
Nikzad, M. et al, “Thermo-mechanical Properties of a Highly Filled Polymeric Composites for Fused Deposition Modeling”, Materials & Design (2011) pp. 3448-3456, vol. 32. |
Walker, Brett S et al., “Reactive Silver Inks for Pattering High-conductivity Features at Mild Temperatures”. J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2012) pp. 1419-1421, vol. 134. |
Campbell, Thomas A., et al., “The Next Wave: 4D Printing Programming the Material World”, Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security Report, Atlantic Council (2014) pp. 1-18. |
Meng, Fancheng et al., “Electro-Induced Mechanical and Thermal Responses of Carbon Nanotube Fibers”, Adv. Mater. (2014) pp. 2480-2485, vol. 26. |
Namiki, M. et al., “3D Printing of Continuous Fiber Reinforced Plastic”, SAMPE Conf. Proc., (2014) pp. 59-4328. |
Dresselhaus, M. S., Dresselhaus, G. and Saito, R., Pergamon “Physics of Carbon Nanotubes,” Carbon vol. 33, No. 7, pp. 883-891, (1995). |
Hoogenboom, R. et al., “Microwave-Assisted Polymer Synthesis: Recent Developments in a Rapidly Expanding Field of Research”, Macromol. Rapid Commun., (2007) pp. 368-386, vol. 28. |
Kumar, P. K.. et al., “Development of Infrared rRadiation Curing System for Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites: An Experimental Investigation”, Indian J. Eng. Mater. Sci. (2011) pp. 24-30, vol. 18. |
Levy, A. et al., “Ultrasonic Welding of Thermoplastic Composites: a Numerical Analysis at the Mesoscopic Scale Relating Processing Parameters, Flow of Polymer and Quality of Adhesion”, Int. J. Mater. Form. (2014) pp. 39-51, vol. 7. |
Bayerl, T. et al., “The Heating of Polymer Composites by Electromagnetic Induction—A review”, Composites, Part A, pp. 27-40 (2014), vol. 57. |
Kim, Jae-Woo et al., “Toward High Performance Thermoset/Carbon Nanotube Sheet Nanocomposites via Resistive Heating Assisted Infiltration and Cure”, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces (2014) pp. 8832-18843, vol. 6. |
Soylemez, Emrecan et al., “Controlling Melt Pool Dimensions Over a Wide Range of Material Deposition Rates in Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing”, Solid Freeform Fabrication Conference (2010) pp. 571-582. |
Vasinonta, Aditad et al., “Process Maps for predicting residual stress andmelt pool size in the laser—based fabrication of thin—walled structures,” J. Manuf., Sci. Eng (2006) pp. 101-109, vol. 129(1). |
Beuth, J. et al., “The Roles of process variables in laser—based direct metal solid freeform fabrication”, N. JOM (2001) pp. 36-39, vol. 53. |
Stiltner, Justin L. et al., “A Method for Creating Actuated Joints via Fiber Embedding in a Polyjet 3D Printing Process”, 22nd Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 2011, pp. 583-592. |
Ge, QI et al., “Active materials by four-dimension printing,” cited as Applied Physics Letters (2013) pp. 131901-1-1319015-5, vol. 103. |
Wool, Richard P., “Self-healing Materials a Review”, Soft Matter, 2008 pp. 400-418, vol. 4. |
Liu, Ying et al., “Self-folding of Polymer Sheets Using Local Light Absorption”, Soft Matter Feb. 14, 2012, pp. 1764-1769, vol. 8, No. 6. |
Seufzer, William J., “Additive Manufacturing Modeling And Simulation”, NASA/TM—2014-13 218245, pp. 1-23, Apr. 2014. |
Beuth, Jack and Klingbeil, “The Role of Process Variables in Laser-Based Direct Metal Solid Freeform Fabrication”, JOM, Sep. 2001, pp. 36-39. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170129182 A1 | May 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62251372 | Nov 2015 | US |