The present application relates to the field of cutting tools comprising round cutting inserts, and in particular, to anti-rotation mechanisms for the same.
Cutting inserts used in cutting tools such as milling cutters are typically mounted in complementary-shaped pockets spaced around a periphery of a tool body. The cutting inserts are typically secured within their respective pockets by screws inserted through an aperture provided in the center of the cutting insert. During a cutting operation, such cutting inserts often experience not only compressive and vibratory forces, but some amount of torque due to the angle between the cutting edges of the cutting inserts and the workpiece. For cutting inserts of non-round shapes, such torque does not result in rotation of the cutting insert due to the interference-type fit between the angled exterior sidewalls of such cutting inserts and the complementary-shaped walls of the pocket that receive them. By contrast, round cutting inserts can rotate within their respective pockets since no such mechanical interference naturally arises between the exterior sidewalls of round cutting inserts and walls of the pockets which receive them.
To prevent such unwanted rotation of round cutting inserts, several anti-rotation mechanisms have been developed previously.
In an example, a single lug is provided on a pocket of a toolholder to engage with one of a plurality of grooves on a round cutting insert to retain the round cutting insert against rotation. As the corresponding portion of the cutting edge of the round cutting insert is worn by the cutting operation, the round cutting insert is repositioned such that the lug engages with another one of the plurality of grooves to expose an unworn portion of the cutting edge of the round cutting insert to the cutting operation. Such round cutting inserts are provided with a different number of grooves (e.g. 4, 6, 8) depending on the desired depth of the cut. However, during machining, a heavy feed tends to cause damage to or even remove the single lug from the pocket, thus reducing the life of the round cutting insert and ruining the tool holder.
In another example, a plurality of lugs (e.g. 4, 6, 8) are provided on a pocket of a toolholder to engage with a corresponding plurality of grooves (e.g. 4, 6, 8) on a round cutting insert to overcome the problem with damaging a single lug. However, the toolholder is limited to use with a cutting insert having the same number of grooves as the number of lugs on the pocket of the toolholder.
Thus, there is a need for an anti-rotation mechanism for round cutting inserts which overcomes the problems of the prior art.
In one embodiment, a cutting tool includes a toolholder and a round cutting insert for mounting on a pocket floor of the toolholder. The toolholder includes the toolholder pocket floor having a bore therein and a plurality of grooves in the pocket floor arranged radially about the bore, wherein adjacent grooves are radially offset by a groove offset angle x. The round cutting insert includes an upper surface having a cutting edge, a lower surface opposite the upper surface, an exterior side surface between the upper surface and the lower surface, an interior side surface defining an aperture extending from the upper surface to the lower surface, and a plurality of lugs arranged radially about the aperture, wherein adjacent lugs are radially offset by a lug offset angle y, and wherein a ratio of y:x is an integer greater than or equal to 2.
In another embodiment, a method for repositioning the round cutting insert in the toolholder pocket includes unfastening the round cutting insert from the toolholder pocket, rotating the round cutting insert by a rotation angle z, and fastening the round cutting insert in the toolholder pocket. The rotation angle z may be, for example, about 45 degrees, about 60 degrees, or about 90 degrees.
In yet another embodiment, a toolholder includes a pocket floor having a bore hole therein, and a plurality of grooves in the pocket floor arranged radially about the bore hole, wherein adjacent grooves are radially offset by a groove offset angle x.
In yet another embodiment, a round cutting insert includes an upper surface having a cutting edge, a lower surface opposite the upper surface, an exterior side surface between the upper surface and the lower surface, an interior side surface defining an aperture extending from the upper surface to the lower surface, and a plurality of lugs arranged radially about the aperture, wherein adjacent lugs are radially offset by a lug offset angle y.
Other embodiments of the disclosed cutting tools will become apparent from the following detailed description, the accompanying drawings and the appended claims.
The toolholder 100 as illustrated in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The plurality of grooves 120 may be formed into a raised island 116 that is raised relative to a base 118 of the pocket floor 112. As shown in
Referring to
The upper edge of the first segment engagement surface 122 and the upper edge of the second segment engagement surface 123 may define a maximum angular segment width 126, which is defined in terms of degrees about the bore 114. In an aspect, the maximum angular segment width 126 of each segment 121 may be less than the groove offset angle x to facilitate a maximum density of segments 121 positioned on the pocket floor 112 and to avoid interference of the segments 121 with the cutting insert 200.
Each segment 121 may further include an inner end 124 proximate the bore 114 and an outer end 125 opposite the inner end 124. In an aspect, the first segment engagement surface 122, the second segment engagement surface 123, the inner end 124, and the outer end 125 may include slanted surfaces to provide for an increased resistance of the segments 121 against damage during operation of the cutting tool 10. In an aspect, the outer end 125 may have a higher width than the inner end 124 to facilitate a decreased maximum angular segment width 126 of each segment 121.
The cutting insert 200 may be formed of any material not inconsistent with the objectives of the present description. Exemplary materials include cemented carbide, carbide, polycrystalline diamond, polycrystalline cubic boron nitride, ceramic, cermet, steel or other alloy. In a specific example, the substrate is formed of cemented carbide. A cemented carbide substrate may include tungsten carbide (WC). WC can be present in any amount not inconsistent with the objectives of the present description. For example, WC can be present in an amount of at least 70 weight percent, in an amount of at least 80 weight percent, or in an amount of at least 85 weight percent. Additionally, a metallic binder of cemented carbide can include cobalt or cobalt alloy. Cobalt, for example, can be present in a cemented carbide substrate in an amount ranging from 1 weight percent to 15 weight percent. In some embodiments, cobalt is present in a cemented carbide substrate in an amount ranging from 5-12 weight percent or from 6-10 weight percent. Further, a cemented carbide substrate may exhibit a zone of binder enrichment beginning at and extending inwardly from the surface of the substrate. Cemented carbide substrates can also include one or more additives such as, for example, one or more of the following elements and/or their compounds: titanium, niobium, vanadium, tantalum, chromium, zirconium and/or hafnium. In some embodiments, titanium, niobium, vanadium, tantalum, chromium, zirconium and/or hafnium form solid solution carbides with WC of the substrate. For example, the substrate can include one or more solid solution carbides in an amount ranging from 0.1-5 weight percent. Additionally, a cemented carbide substrate can include, for example, nitrogen. In an aspect, the cutting insert 200 may be a coated body, including one or more coatings.
The round cutting insert 200 includes an upper surface 210 having a cutting edge 211, a lower surface 220 opposite the upper surface 210, an exterior side surface 230 between the upper surface 210 and the lower surface 220, and an interior side surface 240 defining an aperture 241 extending from the upper surface 210 to the lower surface 220. When the round cutting insert 200 is mounted onto the toolholder body 102 of the toolholder 100, the lower surface 220 of the round cutting insert 200 engages with the pocket floor 112 of the toolholder 100, and the exterior side surface 230 is proximate to the pocket sidewall 115 of the toolholder 100.
As shown in the illustrated example of
Referring to
The interior side surface 240 defines aperture 241 that is centrally disposed through the round cutting insert 200. As shown to
Referring to
By selecting the ratio of the lug offset angle y to the groove offset angle x to be an integer greater than or equal to 2, the plurality of lugs 221 may be positioned within the plurality of grooves 120 such that the cutting insert 200 may be rotated with respect to the toolholder pocket 110 in small amounts defined by the groove offset angle x. Thus, the minimum amount of rotation of the cutting insert 200 is limited by the groove offset angle x rather than by the lug offset angle y. Manufacturing the plurality of grooves 120 to have a small groove offset angle x may easier than manufacturing the plurality of lugs 221 to have a small lug offset angle y. Therefore, by limiting the minimum rotation of the cutting insert by only the groove offset angle x, the present description provides for a cutting tool 10 having a low minimum rotation of the cutting insert 100 while minimizing difficulties of manufacturing of the cutting insert 100.
In an aspect, the groove offset angle is in a range of from 7 to 17 degrees. In a first example, the groove offset angle is in a range of from 7 to 9 degrees, preferably 7.5 degrees. In a second example, the groove offset angle is in a range of from 9 to 11 degrees, preferably 10 degrees. In a third example, the groove offset angle is in a range of from 14 to 16 degrees, preferably 15 degrees. A groove offset angle of about 7.5 degrees or about 15 degrees is beneficial because the 7.5 or 15 degree groove offset angle enables for rotation of the cutting insert 200 in standard amounts of 90 degrees, 60 degrees, and 45 degrees, which provides for 4 rotations (360 degrees/90 degrees), 6 rotations (360 degrees/60 degrees), and 8 rotations (360/45 degrees). The groove offset angle of 7.5 degrees would provide for additional flexibility in the angles of rotation of the cutting insert upon repositioning, and the groove offset angle of 15 degrees would provide for ease of manufacturing of the lugs and grooves in the cutting insert and pocket floor. A groove offset angle of about 10 degrees would enables for rotation of the cutting insert 200 in amounts of, for example, 90 degrees, 60 degrees, and 40 degrees, which provides for 4 rotations (360 degrees/90 degrees), 6 rotations (360 degrees/60 degrees), and 9 rotations (360/40 degrees).
The cutting insert 200 would provide for replacement of conventional round cutting inserts that have a defined number of grooves therein for engaging with a corresponding number of lugs on a toolholder pocket. Thus, the cutting insert 200 would eliminate or reduce the need for creating multiple cutting inserts having differing number of grooves to satisfying differing requirements regarding depth of cut and number of rotations of the cutting insert upon repositioning.
In an aspect, the lug offset angle is in a range of from 14 to 32 degrees. In a first example, the lug offset angle is in a range of from 14 to 16 degrees, preferably 15 degrees. In a second example, the lug offset angle is in a range of from 19 to 21 degrees, preferably 20 degrees. In a third example, the lug offset angle is in a range of from 29 to 31 degrees, preferably 30 degrees.
A lug offset angle of about 15, about 20, or about 30 degrees is beneficial because these degree lug offset angles are twice of the groove offset angles of about 7.5, about 10, and about 15, and thus alternating grooves in the pocket floor may be engaged with lugs of the cutting insert to ensure high resistance against rotation of the cutting insert. A lug offset angle of three times the number of grooves, i.e., about 22.5 degrees, about 30 degrees, or about 45 degrees, or a lug offset angle of four times the number of grooves, i.e. about 30 degrees, about 40 degrees, or about 60 degrees, etc., would also function, but would result in less engagement between grooves in the pocket floor and lugs of the cutting insert.
Also, a lug offset angle of 30 degrees is beneficial because the 30 degree lug offset provides for enough clearance between lugs for ease of manufacturing during a process of machining the lugs at the bottom of the cutting insert. A smaller lug offset angle of about 20 degrees or about 15 degrees would also function but machining of the lugs would be increasingly challenging.
The lower surface 220 may include landing 222 extending about a periphery of the lower surface 220. The landing 222 may function to engage with the base 118 of the pocket floor 112 to support the cutting insert 200 when fastened within the toolholder pocket 110. The landing 222 may typically take the form a generally planar surface. The landing 222 may having a landing width 223 sufficient to support the cutting insert 200 when fastened within the toolholder pocket 110.
The plurality of lugs 221 on the lower surface 220 may be positioned within a depressed cavity 224 that is depressed relative to the landing 222. By positioning the plurality of lugs 221 within the cavity 224, the cutting insert 200 may be primarily supported by the landing 222 when fastened within the toolholder pocket 110, and the plurality of lugs 221 may primarily function to prevent unintended rotation of the cutting insert 200 within the toolholder pocket 110.
Each lug 221 may be defined by a structure of the cutting insert 200 extending from a trough 225 to a crest 226 to an adjacent trough 225, having a height 227 and length 228. The height 227 corresponds to a depth of the grooves 120 in the pocket floor 112. Thus, the lugs have first lug engagement surfaces that corresponds to the first segment engagement surfaces 122 and second lug engagement surfaces that corresponds to the second segment engagement surfaces 123. The lugs may define a maximum angular lug width 229, which is defined in terms of degrees about the aperture 241. In an aspect, the maximum angular segment width 229 of each lug 221 may be less than the groove offset angle x to facilitate a maximum density of lugs 221 and segments 121 and to avoid interference of the lugs 221 with the segments 121 during placement of the cutting insert 200 within the pocket floor 112 of the toolholder 100.
With references to
In the case that the groove offset angle is, in the first example, about 15 degrees, the cutting insert 200 may be rotated by a rotation angle z in increments of 15 degrees. Thus, the cutting insert 200 may be rotated by, for example, a rotation angle z of about 45 degrees to provide for 8 total of rotations before replacement of the cutting insert. Alternatively, the same cutting insert 200 may be rotated by a rotation angle z of about 60 degrees to provide for 6 total of rotations before replacement of the cutting insert. Alternatively, the same cutting insert 200 may be rotated by a rotation angle z of about 90 degrees to provide for 4 total of rotations before replacement of the cutting insert.
In the case that the groove offset angle is, in the second example, about 10 degrees, the cutting insert 200 may be rotated by a rotation angle z in increments of 10 degrees. Thus, the cutting insert 200 may be rotated by, for example, a rotation angle z of about 40 degrees to provide for 9 total of rotations before replacement of the cutting insert. Alternatively, the same cutting insert 200 may be rotated by a rotation angle z of about 60 degrees to provide for 6 total of rotations before replacement of the cutting insert. Alternatively, the same cutting insert 200 may be rotated by a rotation angle z of about 90 degrees to provide for 4 total of rotations before replacement of the cutting insert.
In the case that the groove offset angle is, in the third example, about 7.5 degrees, the cutting insert 200 may be rotated by a rotation angle z in increments of 7.5 degrees. Thus, the cutting insert 200 may be rotated by, for example, a rotation angle z of about 22.5 degrees to provide for 16 total of rotations before replacement of the cutting insert. Alternatively, the same cutting insert 200 may be rotated by a rotation angle z of about 30 degrees to provide for 12 total of rotations before replacement of the cutting insert. Alternatively, the same cutting insert 200 may be rotated by a rotation angle z of about 45 degrees to provide for 8 total of rotations before replacement of the cutting insert.
Thus, the toolholder 100 and cutting insert 200 of the present description provide for a single cutting tool 10 that provides for a durable and effective anti-rotation mechanism while providing flexibility for the user to select a number of total desired rotations (e.g., 4 rotations, 6 rotations, 8 rotations) depending on the desired depth of the cut for the machining operation.
Although various embodiments of the disclosed cutting tool have been shown and described, modifications may occur to those skilled in the art upon reading the specification. The present application includes such modifications and is limited only by the scope of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
349475 | Barclay | Sep 1886 | A |
1460030 | Mattson | Jun 1923 | A |
2289344 | Cedarleaf | Jul 1942 | A |
5236288 | Flueckiger | Aug 1993 | A |
5658100 | Deiss et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5810518 | Wiman et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5924826 | Bystrom | Jul 1999 | A |
5931613 | Larsson | Aug 1999 | A |
6146060 | Rydberg | Nov 2000 | A |
6152658 | Satran | Nov 2000 | A |
6238133 | DeRoche | May 2001 | B1 |
6626614 | Nakamura | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6926472 | Arvidsson | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7001114 | Blucher | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7121771 | Englund | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7156006 | Hyatt et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7325471 | Massa | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7490533 | Dehn | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7607867 | Benson | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7722297 | Dufour et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7908945 | Dufour et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
D658218 | Morrison et al. | Apr 2012 | S |
8147171 | Dufour et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8573901 | de Souza Filho | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8573903 | Morrison et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8657539 | Morrison et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
D709110 | Morrison et al. | Jul 2014 | S |
8858130 | Morrison et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9011049 | Fang et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9120154 | Hecht | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9283626 | Fang et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9505065 | Morrison et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9656334 | Saji et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
10173275 | Roman | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10252355 | Marie et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10363616 | Yamada | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10406608 | Brown et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
20030210961 | Arvidsson | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040028486 | Englund | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040057785 | Blucher | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050047885 | Hyatt et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050152754 | Wiman | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20070009334 | Edler | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011860 | Dehn et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070122242 | Englund | May 2007 | A1 |
20080145159 | Benson | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20110103905 | Morrison | May 2011 | A1 |
20120251250 | Morrison | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130279994 | Morrison | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140086694 | Fang | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140086696 | Fang | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140212226 | Saji | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140294525 | Hecht | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20160207124 | Brown | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20170291232 | Yamada | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170291233 | Marie et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20210129239 | Dufour | May 2021 | A1 |
20210379679 | Bonenfant | Dec 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
105269058 | Jan 2016 | CN |
102009049088 | Apr 2011 | DE |
11245105 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2013075337 | Apr 2013 | JP |
2014076505 | May 2014 | JP |
5754331 | Jul 2015 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220339721 A1 | Oct 2022 | US |