Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6270165
-
Patent Number
6,270,165
-
Date Filed
Friday, October 22, 199925 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, August 7, 200123 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
- Bagnell; David
- Kreck; John
Agents
- Burns, Doane, Swecker & Mathis, LLP
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 299 111
- 299 113
- 299 110
- 299 791
- 299 852
- 299 871
- 299 100
- 299 102
- 299 103
- 299 104
- 299 105
- 299 106
- 299 107
- 299 108
- 299 109
- 175 426
- 037 453
- 037 454
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A rotatable tool for breaking hard material includes an elongated tool body and a cutting cap mounted on the tool body. The cutting cap includes a generally conical front tip having a maximum first diameter (d), and a rear base portion having an outer peripheral surface defining a maximum second diameter (D). An intermediate portion extends from the tip to the base, and at least a part of the intermediate portion has a concave outer peripheral surface. A longitudinal extent (H) of the cap extends from a front end of the tip to a rear end of the outer peripheral surface of the base. A ratio of d to D is equal to or greater than 0.7. A ratio of H to D is equal to or greater than 1.0.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to cutting tools used on mining and construction machines to break hard natural materials such as rock and minerals (e.g., coal) and also man-made materials such as concrete and asphalt.
Known in the industry is a prior art cutting tool of that type which comprises a hard alloy cap having a base mounted on a metal shank (e.g., see U.S. Pat. No. 4,938,538). The base of the hard alloy cap is shaped in such a way as to provide the tool with sufficient strength and durability for its intended operating conditions. Also known in the industry is the fact that caps have a better geometric shape than inserts, which improves the cutting efficiency of the tool by reducing the cutting forces needed to break the material. Further known is the fact that caps increase the operating life of prior art tools by better protecting the metal shank from the material being cut.
However, the geometric form of the cap is not optimal for the operating life of the tool. A prior art tool depicted in
FIGS. 1 and 2
comprises a steel tool body
10
and a cap
11
of hard metal. The cap
11
has a conical tip
12
, and a base
13
intended to rest against a supporting surface
14
on the tool body
10
, to protect the portion of the steel tool body
10
surrounding the cutting cap
11
from such wear as would cause the cap
11
to become loose. The rear contact surface
20
of the base
13
is brazed to the supporting surface
14
. The cap
11
is provided with an intermediate portion
15
located between the tip
12
and the base
13
.
The intermediate portion
15
comprises a cylindrical intermediate surface portion
17
″, and a concave portion
17
′. Due to the elongated intermediate surface portion
17
″ the required cutting force is maintained low even when the tip portion
12
becomes worn since the tip size remains generally the same as the tip wears down along the elongated intermediate surface portion
17
″. Due to this design it is also ensured that the steel in the tool body
10
surrounding the cutting insert is protected against premature abrasion; this protection being provided by the concave portion
17
′ and the base
13
. The base
13
has a diameter D, and the intermediate surface portion
17
″ has a diameter d. A distance H extends from the front of the tip portion
12
to a rear end of the base
13
. A ratio of H/D is less than 1.0, and a ratio of d/D is less than 0.7.
Despite the successful performance of that cap
11
, room for improvement remains. Often times the cap wears down to a shape that increases the cutting forces so much that the tool becomes unusable. Larger caps can increase the life of the tool, but since the hard alloy material is usually an expensive tungsten-cobalt material, the cost of the tool also increases.
An object of the invention is to provide a cap geometry which reduces the cost of the tool by using less tungsten-cobalt material while increasing the life of the tool by maintaining lower cutting forces longer, and at the same time protecting the metal shank from the material being cut.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to a rotatable tool for breaking hard material.
The tool comprises an elongated tool body, and a cutting cap formed of hard metal and defining a longitudinal axis. The cutting cap includes a generally conical front tip, a rear base portion, and an intermediate portion. The tip has a maximum first diameter (d). The base portion has an outer peripheral surface defining a maximum second diameter (D), and a rearwardly facing surface bonded to a front end of the tool body. The intermediate portion extends from the tip to the base and defines an abrupt transition from the tip. At least part of the intermediate portion has a concave outer peripheral surface. A longitudinal extent (H) of the cap extends from a front end of the tip to a rear end of the outer peripheral surface of the base. The ratio of d to D is equal to or greater than 0.7. The ratio of H to D is equal to or greater than 1.0.
The invention also relates to the cutting cap per se.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
The objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment thereof in connection with the accompanying drawing in which like numerals designate like elements in which;
FIG. 1
is a side elevational view, partly broken away, depicting a prior art excavating tool;
FIG. 2
is a side elevational view of a prior art cutting cap used in the tool of
FIG. 1
;
FIG. 3
is a side elevational view of a cutting cap according to the present invention;
FIG. 4
is a side elevational view, partly broken away, depicting the cutting cap of
FIG. 3
mounted in a tool body;
FIG. 5
is a view of a modified form of the cap depicted in
FIG. 3
; and
FIG. 6
is a view of the cap of
FIG. 5
mounted in a tool body.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
A hard alloy cap
111
for use in a steel tool body
10
defines a longitudinal axis L. The cap
111
includes a conical tip
112
, and a base
113
which is intended to rest on a front supporting surface
14
of the tool body
10
. The base
113
includes a cylindrical outer peripheral surface
114
, and a projection forming a rearwardly facing contact surface
120
brazed to the supporting surface
14
. The cutting cap
111
includes an intermediate portion
115
located between the tip
112
and the base
113
. The base
113
protects the portion of the tool body
10
that surrounds the cap from excessive wear.
The intermediate portion
115
comprises a cylindrical intermediate surface
117
″ adjoining the tip
112
, and a concave surface portion
117
′ extending from the intermediate surface
117
″ to the front end of the base
113
. In
FIG. 3
the following dimensions are represented:
D—maximum diameter of base
113
d—maximum diameter of tip
112
H—longitudinal extent from the front end of the tip
112
to an intersection
130
of the rearwardly facing surface
120
with the maximum diameter of the base (i.e., the effective height of the cap.) That surface
120
tapers rearwardly and is oriented coaxially with the longitudinal center axis L of the cap
111
.
The following relationships are critical for the invention:
H/D≧
1.0
d/D≧
0.7
Thus, it is critical that the ratio of H/D be equal to or greater than 1.0, and that the ratio of d/D be equal to or greater than 0.7.
Prior art caps having a d/D ratio less than 0.7, and a H/D ratio less than 1.0, result in a short geometry having a small intermediate diameter d, and a wide base.
By making the d/D ratio greater than or equal to 0.7, and making the H/D ratio equal to or greater than 1.0, there results a taller geometry having a larger intermediate diameter and smaller base diameter. Those ratios make the cap more economical by reducing the cap volume, i.e., the amount of expensive hard alloy (e.g., tungsten carbide-cobalt alloy) that must be used to make the cap. The ratios also keep the tool sharper, thereby increasing tool life by maintaining lower cutting forces for a longer period.
Although the intermediate portion
115
has been depicted as including a cylindrical portion
117
″, that portion
117
″ could be deleted and replaced by an extension of the concave surface
117
′, which extension would be substantially parallel to the axis L at the place where it intersects the tip
112
.
A modified form of a cap
111
A is depicted in
FIGS. 5 and 6
. The cap
111
A corresponds to the cap
111
, except that the base
113
A does not include a rearward projection. Thus, the surface
120
A that is brazed to the tool body
110
extends perpendicularly to the axis L and intersects the rear end of the cylindrical surface
1114
A of the base
113
A at
130
A.
Although the present invention has been described in connection with a preferred embodiment thereof, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that additions, deletions, modifications, and substitutions not specifically described may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in appended claims.
Claims
- 1. A rotatable tool for breaking hard material, comprising:an elongated tool body; and a cutting cap formed of hard metal defining a longitudinal axis and including: a generally conical front tip having a maximum first diameter (d), a rear base portion having an outer peripheral surface defining a maximum second diameter (D), and a rearwardly facing surface bonded to a front end of the tool body, and an intermediate portion extending from the tip to the base and defining an abrupt transition from the tip, at least part of the intermediate portion having a concave outer peripheral surface, a longitudinal extent (H) of the cap extends from a front end of the tip to an intersection of the rearwardly facing surface with the maximum second diameter, wherein d/D≧0.7 and H/D≧1.0.
- 2. The tool according to claim 1 wherein the intermediate portion further includes a cylindrical portion interconnecting the tip and the concave surface.
- 3. The tool according to claim 1 wherein the intersection between the rearwardly facing surface and the maximum second diameter lies at a rear end of a cylindrical portion of the outer peripheral surface.
- 4. The tool according to claim 1 wherein the rearwardly facing surface is disposed on a projection projecting rearwardly from the maximum second diameter coaxially relative to a longitudinal center axis of the cutting cap, the rearwardly facing surface tapering rearwardly.
- 5. The tool according to claim 1 wherein the rearwardly facing surface is oriented perpendicular to a longitudinal center axis of the cutting cap.
- 6. A cutting cap adapted to be mounted on a rotatable tool body for breaking hard material, the cutting cap formed of a hard metal and defining a longitudinal axis, the cutting cap comprising:a generally conical front tip having a maximum first diameter (d), a rear base portion having an outer peripheral surface defining a maximum second diameter (D), and a rearwardly facing surface adapted to be bonded to a front end of the tool body, and an intermediate portion extending from the tip to the base and defining an abrupt transition from the tip, at least part of the intermediate portion having a concave outer peripheral surface, a longitudinal extent (H) of the cap extends from a front end of the tip to an intersection of the rearwardly facing surface with the maximum second diameter, wherein d/D≧0.7 and H/D≧1.0.
- 7. The cutting cap according to claim 6 wherein the intermediate portion further includes a cylindrical portion interconnecting the tip and the concave surface.
- 8. The cutting cap according to claim 6 wherein the concave surface has a constant radius of curvature.
- 9. The cutting cap according to claim 6 wherein the intersection between the rearwardly facing surface and the maximum second diameter lies at a rear end of a cylindrical portion of the outer peripheral surface.
- 10. The cutting cap according to claim 6 wherein the rearwardly facing surface is disposed on a projection projecting rearwardly from the maximum second diameter coaxially relative to a longitudinal center axis of the cutting cap, the rearwardly facing surface tapering rearwardly.
- 11. The cutting cap according to claim 6 wherein the rearwardly facing surface is oriented perpendicular to a longitudinal center axis of the cutting cap.
US Referenced Citations (6)