The present invention relates to a self-adjusting downhole tool and more particularly to a self-adjusting downhole tool for removing a material, such as an under reamer or a milling tool.
Following the initial drilling of a wellbore or borehole into a formation, it is sometimes necessary to under ream or enlarge the borehole. For example, it may be required that the diameter of a borehole be larger than can be achieved with a drill bit that currently fits inside the borehole. Alternatively, if the drill bit has worn down during the drilling of the borehole, then a section of the borehole may not be as large as it should be, or a section of the wall of the borehole may have collapsed or moved into the borehole, at least partially obstructing the borehole.
Typically, for both milling tools and under reamers, once the blades (or cutters) are deployed they are fixed in position 23 relative to the tool body 21 with no possibility for subsequent adjustment. As the tools are rotating it is possible for load to be unevenly distributed between the blades causing excessive and uneven wear to the blades. For example, in the case of a milling tool which is being pulled upward or pushed downward during milling, one of the blades may have a higher/lower cutting surface than the other blades meaning that this blade will be doing most of the milling work, causing that blade to wear excessively. This in turn can reduce the milling speed and result in the need to replace blades more frequently than would otherwise be the case. An uneven load may also cause vibration in the tool which can exacerbate the problem and/or cause other damage to the tool and associated components, e.g. sensitive electronic components.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a milling tool or under reamer that provides for reduces wear on individual blades and/or which increases operating efficiency.
According to the present invention there is provided a tool for use in a borehole to perform a milling, under reaming, or other cutting operation. The tool comprises a tool body configured for rotation about its longitudinal axis, within the borehole, and a set of cutters, the set comprising two or more cutters which, at least in a deployed configuration, extend outwardly from the tool body and are fixedly coupled together whilst being pivotally coupled to the tool body substantially on said axis so that the cutters rotate with the tool body whilst being pivotable together relative to the tool body during cutting.
The cutters of said set of cutters may be spaced substantially equiangularly around the tool.
The tool may comprise a set of arms fixedly connecting respective cutters to a centre point on said axis, the arms being fixedly connected together at the centre point and to the tool by a pivotable coupling.
The tool may comprise two or more of said sets of cutters, the cutters of each set being pivotable relative to the tool body independently of the cutters of the or each other set of cutters.
The set of cutters may comprise two cutters.
The tool may comprise a deployment mechanism for holding the cutters in a retracted position substantially within the tool body to enable lowering of the tool into the borehole and for deploying the cutters radially outwardly to said deployed position.
As has been discussed above, conventional milling tools and under reamers, such as are used to remove material from within a borehole, make use of blades and cutters that are rigidly fixed to the tool body at least following deployment, i.e. radial extension.
This can lead to uneven wear on the blades as well as other problems.
In order to mitigate these problems it is proposed here to couple the blades to the tool body so as to allow for a degree of movement between the blades and the tool body and moreover to link the blades together to help share and adjust the loads on the individual blades. This linkage can take various forms depending on what is to be achieved but, in short, the object is to transfer part of the load from one blade experiencing a high load to another blade experiencing a lower load, thereby more evenly distributing the load. A benefit may be increased tool lifetime as even wear over the cutters may prevent premature tool failure and/or faster milling or under reaming speeds. Further benefits include extended milling lengths and reduced number of trips into the borehole.
The cutters 24a, 24b are attached to respective arms 26a, 26b, with the arms being connected together at a centre point of the tool body. In the fully deployed state shown in
Although not shown in
In a modification to the embodiment of
In addition to balancing the downward forces exerted on the cutters, the arrangements described above can also reduce the uneven sideways force when cutters bite into the tubulars or formation, thereby tending to centre the tool and reduce the amount of vibration caused by under reaming or milling operations. This also mitigates the damaging effects of any sudden side forces created if a single arm bites into formation or casing.
It will be appreciated that various modifications may be made to the above described embodiments without departing from the scope of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1711287 | Jul 2017 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO2018/050182 | 7/9/2018 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/013645 | 1/17/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1022129 | Evans | Apr 1912 | A |
2188409 | Lane | Jan 1940 | A |
2216895 | Stokes | Oct 1940 | A |
4431065 | Andrews | Feb 1984 | A |
4938291 | Lynde | Jul 1990 | A |
5074355 | Lennon | Dec 1991 | A |
5201817 | Hailey | Apr 1993 | A |
5265675 | Hearn | Nov 1993 | A |
5671816 | Tibbitts | Sep 1997 | A |
5732770 | Beeman | Mar 1998 | A |
7143847 | Pia | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7909100 | Bryant, Jr. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
9187971 | Hutchinson | Nov 2015 | B2 |
10202814 | Fuller | Feb 2019 | B2 |
20050205305 | Stout | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20110297379 | Laird | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120205157 | Radford | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 372 056 | Aug 2002 | GB |
WO 2004104361 | Dec 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, issued in PCT/NO2018/050182, dated Aug. 29, 2018. |
United Kingdom Combined Search and Examination Report, issued in Priority Application No. 1711287.1, dated Nov. 30, 2017. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, issued in PCT/NO2018/050182, dated Aug. 29, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200217158 A1 | Jul 2020 | US |