Patent Grant
12258095
Any and all applications for which a foreign or domestic priority claim is identified in the Application Data Sheet as filed with the present application are hereby incorporated by reference under 37 CFR 1.57.
The disclosure is generally directed to wheel suspension assemblies for cycles, and is more specifically directed to wheel suspension assemblies for cycles that include a rotation sensor for measuring angular displacement between two links in the wheel suspension assembly.
Suspensions are important components of wheeled vehicles, including cycles. Suspensions allow a wheel to move in a compliant manner, relative to a frame, in response to ground conditions as a rider pilots the vehicle, while improving handling and control during riding. In many cases, suspensions comprise links and pivot assemblies which together form an articulating mechanism which allows a wheel to move. Pivot assemblies allow suspension components such as links to articulate in one or more degrees of freedom, typically via rotation.
Recently, telescopic front suspension forks have dominated suspension systems for two-wheeled vehicles. A telescopic fork includes sliding stanchions connected in a steerable manner to a vehicle frame, and at the same time, includes a telescoping mechanism for wheel displacement. Few, if any, telescopic forks include pivot assemblies.
Linkage front suspensions, comprising links and pivot assemblies, have been attempted in the past as an alternative to telescopic forks, yet they have failed to achieve market acceptance. In contrast, linkages comprising links and pivot assemblies account for almost all the rear suspensions available for two wheeled suspension structures sold today, and almost no examples of solely telescopic or sliding rear suspension structures can be found in today's marketplace.
While linkages including links and pivot assemblies can be economically manufactured, and typically feature very low friction, and linkages are also relatively easy to seal from the elements, many front suspension linkages suffer from poor kinematic performance, usually driven by prioritizing brake dive performance rather than stability.
Telescopic forks on the other hand use sliding stanchions, which require very expensive and tight manufacturing tolerances. Outer surfaces of the stanchion typically slide against bushings to allow for compliance. Front suspension for a cycle is subject to large bending forces fore and aft and less significant lateral forces. Because telescopic forks have relatively large stanchions, and relatively large sliding surfaces and seals, large breakaway friction in the system (known as stiction) is generated by these components. Stiction resists compression of the suspension in reaction to bumps, which is a drawback in a suspension product where the goal is to react to road or terrain conditions, for example by deflecting in response to ground conditions, and/or absorbing impact from bumps. Additionally, as the telescopic fork is loaded in the fore/aft direction (usually on impact or braking), the bushings bind, resulting in even greater stiction at the exact moment when a rider needs the most compliance. Telescopic forks and their large sliding bushings also require smooth stanchion surfaces and significant maintenance and upkeep to keep performance from diminishing quickly.
The quality of cycle suspension performance is correlated to proper setup for the rider. Proper setup for the rider includes adjusting the performance characteristics of certain suspension components to optimize overall ride characteristics, for a rider's weight and ability for example.
Adjusting rider setup on a telescopic fork or rear shock typically involves measuring fork or shock compression, which typically requires two people, one to compress the suspension and the other to measure the suspension displacement with a ruler. This is a difficult, time consuming, and frequently inaccurate method of measuring suspension displacement. External devices such as tape measures adapted for one person suspension displacement measuring have been tried with limited success. Another method involves affixing an o-ring around the stanchion or sliding shaft, and letting the o-ring contact the fork or shock seal. As the suspension compresses, the o-ring is forced along the stanchion or shaft via contact with the fork or shock seal, and then when the suspension is fully extended, the o-ring remains at the compressed position due to friction, and a measurement between measurement between the o-ring and fork or shock seal can be made to determine suspension travel used. Using an o-ring to measure travel is problematic because it can trap dirt and grit against the stanchion or shaft, causing surface damage and further compromising friction, stiction, and suspension performance. Furthermore, o-rings are fragile thin section pieces of rubber that can be easily damaged or degrade over time, and in some cases are impossible or difficult to replace when damaged due to fork or shock construction.
In accordance with a first embodiment, a suspension assembly for a cycle includes a first link having a first pivot and a second link movably connected to the first link by the first pivot. A rotation sensor is operably connected to the first pivot. The rotation sensor measures angular displacement between the first link and the second link.
In accordance with a second embodiment, a front wheel suspension assembly for a cycle includes a first front suspension link having a first pivot and a second front suspension link movably connected to the first suspension link by the first pivot. A front wheel of a cycle is operably connected to one of the first front suspension link or the second front suspension link. A rotation sensor is operably connected to the first pivot, and the rotation sensor measures angular displacement between the first front suspension link and the second front suspension link.
In accordance with a third embodiment, a suspension assembly for a cycle includes a first link having a first pivot and a second link movably connected to the first link by the first pivot. A shock absorber is operably coupled to the first link or to the second link. The shock absorber includes a damper with a variable orifice.
The first, second, and third embodiments may include any one or more of the following aspects.
In one aspect, the first pivot is a fixed pivot and in another aspect, the first pivot is a floating pivot.
In another aspect, the first link is a fork arm.
In yet another aspect, the rotation sensor comprises one of a magnetic sensor, an optical sensor, an electrical sensor, an accelerometer, a potentiometer, or a resistive sensor.
In yet another aspect, the rotation sensor is one of an optical reflective sensor or an optical interrupter sensor.
In yet another aspect, the rotation sensor is one of a variable reluctance sensor, an eddy current killed oscillator sensor, a Wiegand sensor, or a Hall effect sensor.
In accordance with a fourth embodiment, a method for adjusting a suspension assembly for a cycle includes providing a suspension assembly including a first link having a first pivot, a second link movably connected to the first link by the first pivot, and a rotation sensor operably connected to the first pivot. The rotation sensor measures a first angular relationship between the first link and the second link when the suspension assembly is in an uncompressed state. The first angular relationship is output to a processor. The suspension assembly is moved into a compressed state. The rotation sensor measures a second angular relationship between the first link and the second link in the compressed date. The second angular relationship is output to the processor. A difference between the first angular relationship and the second angular relationship is calculated in the processor to determine a setpoint value for a component of the suspension assembly. The setpoint value from the processor is output to a display. A component of the suspension assembly is adjusted based on the setpoint value.
The fourth embodiment may include any one or more of the following aspects.
In one aspect, the first pivot is a fixed pivot and in another aspect, the first pivot is a floating pivot.
In another aspect, the first link is a fork arm.
In yet another aspect, the rotation sensor comprises one of a magnetic sensor, an optical sensor, an electrical sensor, an accelerometer, a potentiometer, or a resistive sensor.
In yet another aspect, the rotation sensor is one of an optical reflective sensor or an optical interrupter sensor.
In yet another aspect, the rotation sensor is one of a variable reluctance sensor, an eddy current killed oscillator sensor, a Wiegand sensor, or a Hall effect sensor.
In yet another aspect, the step of adjusting the component includes changing a characteristic of a shock absorber, a damper, or a combination of a shock absorber and a damper, based on the setpoint value.
In yet another aspect, the characteristic is a fluid flow rate through an orifice.
In yet another aspect, a size of the orifice is changed based on the setpoint value.
In yet another aspect, the step of adjusting the component includes changing a characteristic of one of a gas spring or a coil spring.
In yet another aspect, the characteristic is a spring constant.
In yet another aspect, the spring constant is changed by varying gas pressure in the gas spring.
In yet another aspect, the gas pressure is varied by changing an internal volume of the gas spring
The present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments described below, which are intended as exemplary illustrations of individual aspects of the invention. Functionally equivalent methods and components fall within the scope of the invention. Various modifications of the invention, in addition to those shown and described herein, will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description. Such modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims. Throughout this application, the singular includes the plural and the plural includes the singular, unless indicated otherwise. The words “formed,” “provided,” “disposed,” and “located” are used interchangeably to denote relative positioning in the instant description. All cited publications, patents, and patent applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The disclosed rotation sensor may be combined with multi-link cycle suspension assemblies, such as the suspension assemblies described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/661,821, filed on Jul. 27, 2017; and the disclosed rotation sensor may be used in conjunction with pivot assemblies such as the pivot assemblies described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/153,396, filed on Oct. 5, 2018. Each of U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 15/661,821 and 16/153,396 are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Turning now to
The front wheel suspension assembly 12 also includes a plurality of pivotably connected links 22. One or more of the links 22 may be pivotably connected to a frame member, such as a fork arm 24. The frame member 24 may act as a fixed location for the pivotably connected links 22. As the front wheel 51a moves relative to the frame member, due to changing ground topography/conditions, the links 22 articulate relative to one another, and relative to the frame member 24, thus allowing the front wheel 51a to move relative to the frame member 24 in a compliant manner in response to the changing ground topography/conditions as a rider pilots the cycle 10. The front wheel suspension assembly 12, and thus the links 22, improve handling and control during riding by directing movement of the front wheel 51a relative to the frame member 24 in a predictable and predetermined manner.
As used herein, the term “operably connected” or “operable connection” means any direct or indirect connection between two elements. For example, if a first element is directly connected to a first link in a suspension assembly, the first element is “operably connected” to all links in the suspension assembly because the first element is indirectly connected to all links in the suspension assembly by the direct connection to the first link.
As illustrated in
A shock link 50 is pivotably connected to the first arm fixed pivot 40. The shock link 50 includes a shock link fixed pivot 52 and a shock link floating pivot 54 spaced apart from one another along a length of the shock link 50. The shock link 50 is pivotably connected to the fork arm fixed pivot 40 at the shock link fixed pivot 52 such that the shock link 50 is rotatable about the shock link fixed pivot 52 and the shock link fixed pivot 52 remains in a fixed location relative to the fork arm 24, while the shock link floating pivot 54 is movable relative to the fork arm 24.
A pivot, as used herein, includes any connection structure that may be used to operably connect one element to another element, and that allows relative movement between the connected components. An operative connection may allow for one component to move in relation to another while constraining movement in one or more degrees of freedom. For example, the one degree of freedom may be pivoting about an axis. In one embodiment, a pivot may be formed from a journal or through hole in one component and an axle in another component. In other examples, pivots may include ball and socket joints. Yet other examples of pivots include, but are not limited to singular embodiments and combinations of, compliant mounts, sandwich style mounts, post mounts, bushings, bearings, ball bearings, plain bearings, flexible couplings, flexure pivots, journals, holes, pins, bolts, and other fasteners. Also, as used herein, a fixed pivot is defined as a pivotable structure that does not change position relative the fork arm 24. As used herein, a floating pivot is defined as a pivot that is movable (or changes position) relative to another element, and in this case, is movable relative to fork arm 24. Some examples of pivot structures are further discussed with reference to
The linkage or front wheel suspension assembly 12 is configured in a trailing orientation. A trailing orientation is defined herein as a linkage that includes a fixed pivot that is forward of the corresponding floating pivot when the cycle is traveling in the forward direction of travel as represented by arrow A in
Turning now to
The inshaft 80 and outshaft 90 can comprise a singular component or plurality of components, and may be combined with other components. In some embodiments, the damper piston 83 may be connected to or include a portion or the entirety of the inshaft 80 or outshaft 90. In some embodiments, the damper piston 83 has a greater radial cross-sectional area than the inshaft 80 or the outshaft 90. The inshaft 80 and outshaft 90 can extend between and through a shaft seal 85 to operably connect a gas spring with a damper to provide concurrent movement of the inshaft 80, outshaft 90, gas piston 81, and damper piston 83 during suspension compression and extension.
The spring body 88 may include a gas chamber 88a, which is pressurized with a gas. The pressurized gas biases the gas piston 81 towards the damper body 89. The pressure of the gas within the gas chamber 88a may be changed, as discussed further below, by either changing the volume of the gas chamber 88a, or by adding or subtracting gas molecules to/from the gas chamber 88a, to adjust a setpoint of the front wheel suspension assembly 12 according to rider ability or characteristics.
The damper body 89 may include a first fluid chamber 89a and a second fluid chamber 89b, and a damping fluid. The damping fluid moves between the first fluid chamber 89a and the second fluid chamber 89b, which are separated by a flow control device, such as a flow restriction or a variable orifice (see
Dampers can be dry-friction, or hydraulically based with fluid elements. Dampers dissipate motion energy in the front wheel suspension assembly 12 by producing a force that opposes the direction of motion. Generally, hydraulic dampers include two or more fluid chambers. Fluid moves from one chamber to the other during movement of a piston. Generally, one chamber experiences high pressure during compression and the other chamber experiences high pressure during extension or rebound. As fluid moves between the two chambers, it passes through a flow control device, such as a flow restriction. As the fluid moves through the flow restriction, cavitation can occur due to pressure differences. Increasing the pressure of the oil can reduce cavitation. The oil pressure may be increased by applying force from a spring, such as a gas spring, to the damper stem. For example, in the disclosed embodiment, the gas spring 92 is connected to the outshaft 90, which is connected to the damper piston 83.
In one embodiment, the damper 94 may comprise a twin-tube damper. In other embodiments, the damper 94 may comprise a through-rod telescopic damper, a single tube telescopic damper, or a single tube telescopic damper with a compression piston. Some examples of single tube and twin-tube dampers may be found in “Development of software that can predict damper curves on shock absorbers,” Uppsala Universitet, Examensarbete 15 hp, June 2013; “Understanding your Dampers: A guide from Jim Kasprzak,” www.kaztechnolgies.com; “Flow control valves,” Hydraulics and Pneumatics, Jan. 1, 2012, http://hydraulicspneumatics.com/200/TechZone/HydraulicValves/Article/False/6409/TechZone-HydraulicValves; and “The Shock Absorber Handbook,” John C. Dixon, Chichester, England, John Wiley, 2007; each of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
In some embodiments, the flow control device may comprise a flow restriction such as a narrow passageway. In other embodiments, the flow control device may comprise a variable orifice having an orifice or passageway with a variable cross-sectional area. In other embodiments, the flow control device may comprise a valve, such as a calibrated needle valve. In yet other embodiments, the flow control device may comprise a fluid control regulator. In yet other embodiments, the flow control device may comprise an electrohydraulic valve with a closed loop feedback.
In some embodiments, the flow control device may be located in the damper piston, which is sometimes called a piston valve. In other embodiments, the flow control device may be located between two chambers that are not separated by the piston, this location is sometimes called a foot valve. In other embodiments, the damper may include more than one flow control device, each flow control device targeting a different flow characteristic, such as one flow control device that targets a high speed characteristic and another flow control device that targets a low speed characteristic.
Turning now to
The pressure of the gas in the gas chamber 88a and the flow control device may be adjusted to change the performance characteristics (or setup) of the front wheel suspension assembly 12, as further discussed below.
The damper piston mates to or includes a damper piston seal 93. In some embodiments, the damper piston seal 93 may comprise; multiple, or combinations of glide ring, wear band, o-ring. X-ring, Q ring, quad ring, Teflon seal, cap seal, piston ring, solid piston, T seal, V ring, U cup, urethane seal, PSQ seal, preloaded piston band, or other type of band or seal. The damper piston seal 93 is intended to seal damping fluid between each side of the damper piston 83, while allowing axial movement of the damper piston 83 and therefore axial movement of the inshaft 80 and/or outshaft 90.
In certain embodiments, the gas spring 92 has certain advantages over other types of springs. The gas spring 92 uses a pressurized gas such as air, nitrogen, or other gases to act on the area of a gas piston 81, which results in a force against the gas piston 81. In certain embodiments, a user can change the gas pressure and therefore the force output at the gas piston 81. This allows the user to tailor output force based on preferences or to meet the requirements of varying road conditions. In certain embodiments, a gas spring 92 may comprise pressures that can act on both sides of the gas piston 81. By varying the volume of gas acting on each side of the gas piston 81 and the area of each side of the gas piston 81, one can vary the amount of force output at the gas piston 81 at various points in the damper displacement. This variability can be a valuable tool for allowing the user to tailor output force based on their preference or to meet the requirements of varying road conditions.
The gas piston 81 can be connected to or include a portion or the entirety of the inshaft 80 or outshaft 90. In preferred embodiments, the gas piston 81 has a greater radial cross-sectional area than the inshaft 80 or the outshaft 90. In certain other preferred embodiments, the gas piston 81 has a greater radial cross-sectional area than the damper piston 83. The gas piston 81 mates to or includes a gas piston seal 91. In some embodiments, the gas piston seal 91 may comprise; singular, multiple, or combinations of glide ring, wear band, o-ring. X-ring, Q ring, quad ring, Teflon seal, cap seal, piston ring, solid piston, T seal, V ring, U cup, urethane seal, PSQ seal, preloaded piston band, or other type of band or seal. The gas piston seal 91 is intended to seal gas between each side of the gas piston 81, while allowing axial movement of the gas piston 81 and therefore axial movement of the inshaft 80 and/or outshaft 90.
The shock absorber 44 includes the shaft seals 85. The shaft seals 45 are used to seal damping fluid or gas inside the damper body 89 or spring body 88 while allowing axial movement of an inshaft 80 and/or outshaft 90. The shaft seals 45 can be located at one end of a spring body 88, while sealing gas inside the spring body 88 and allowing axial movement of an inshaft 80 or outshaft 90. The shaft seals 45 can be located at one or more ends of a damper body 89, while sealing damping fluid inside the damper body 89 and allowing axial movement of an inshaft 80 or outshaft 90.
Returning now to
A control link 70 includes a control link floating pivot 72 and a control link fixed pivot 74. The control link floating pivot 72 is pivotably connected to the wheel carrier second pivot 66, and the control link fixed pivot 74 is pivotably connected to a fork arm control pivot 76 located on the fork arm 24 such that the control link floating pivot 72 is pivotable about the control link fixed pivot 74, which remains in a fixed location relative to the fork arm control pivot 76.
In some embodiments, the shock connection pivot 60 is closer to the shock link fixed pivot 52 than to the shock link floating pivot 54, as illustrated in
Mechanical trail (or “trail”, or “caster”) is an important metric relating to handling characteristics of two-wheeled cycles. Mechanical trail is a configuration in which the wheel is rotatably attached to a fork, which has a steering axis that is offset from the contact point of the wheel with the ground. When the steering axis is forward of the contact point, as in the case of a shopping cart, this configuration allows the caster wheel to follow the direction of cart travel. If the contact point moves forward of the steering axis (for example when reversing direction of a shopping cart), the directional control becomes unstable and the wheel spins around to the original position in which the contact point trails the steering axis. The friction between the ground and the wheel causes a self-righting torque that tends to force the wheel to trail the steering axis. The greater the distance between the contact point and perpendicular to the steering axis, the more torque is generated, and the greater the stability of the system. Similarly, the longer the distance between the cycle wheel contact point and perpendicular to the steering axis, the more torque is generated, and the greater the stability of the system. Conversely, the shorter the distance between the cycle wheel contact point and perpendicular to the steering axis, the less torque is generated, and the lower the stability of the system.
This caster effect is an important design characteristic in cycles. Generally, the caster effect describes the cycle rider's perception of stability resulting from the mechanical trail distance described above. If the wheel gets out of line, a self-aligning torque automatically causes the wheel to follow the steering axis again due to the orientation of the wheel ground contact point being behind the steering axis of the fork. As the contact point of the wheel with the ground is moved further behind the steering axis, self aligning torque increases. This increase in stability is referred to herein as the caster effect.
In the disclosed front wheel suspension assembly 12, when the suspension is at a state of full extension, the steering axis of the fork 30 projects ahead of the contact point 82. As the suspension assembly moves towards a state of full compression, the steering axis S projects farther ahead of the contact point 82, which results in the stability increasing. This increased stability stands in contrast to known telescopic fork cycles, which experience reduced trail and thus reduced stability during compression.
Leverage ratios or motion ratios are important metrics relating to performance characteristics of some suspensions. In certain embodiments, a shock absorber can be compressed at a constant or variable rate as the suspension moves at a constant rate towards a state of full compression. As a wheel is compressed, incremental suspension compression distance measurements are taken. Incremental suspension compression distance is measured from the center of the wheel at the wheel rotation axis and parallel with the steering axis, starting from a state of full suspension extension, and moving towards a state of full suspension compression. These incremental measurements are called the incremental suspension compression distance. A shock absorber length can be changed by wheel link, and/or brake link, and/or control link movements as the suspension compresses. At each incremental suspension compression distance measurement, a shock absorber length measurement is taken. The relationship between incremental suspension compression distance change and shock absorber length change for correlating measurements of the suspension's compression is called leverage ratio or motion ratio. Leverage ratio and motion ratio are effectively equivalent but mathematically different methods of quantifying the effects of variable suspension compression distance versus shock compression distance. Overall leverage ratio is the average leverage ratio across the entire range of compression. Overall leverage ratio can be calculated by dividing the total suspension compression distance by the total shock absorber compression distance. Overall motion ratio is the average motion ratio across the entire range of compression. Overall motion ratio can be calculated by dividing the total shock absorber compression distance by the total suspension compression distance.
Generally, a suspended wheel has a compressible wheel suspension travel distance that features a beginning travel state where the suspension is completely uncompressed to a state where no further suspension extension can take place, and an end travel state where a suspension is completely compressed to a state where no further suspension compression can take place. At the beginning of the wheel suspension travel distance, when the suspension is in a completely uncompressed state, the shock absorber is in a state of least compression, and the suspension is easily compressed. As the suspended wheel moves compressively, force at the wheel changes in relation to shock absorber force multiplied by a leverage ratio. A leverage ratio is defined as the ratio of compressive wheel travel change divided by shock absorber measured length change over an identical and correlating given wheel travel distance. A motion ratio is defined as the ratio of shock absorber measured length change divided by compressive wheel travel change over an identical and correlating given wheel travel distance.
In known telescopic forks no leverage ratio exists and, the leverage ratio is always equivalent to 1:1 due to the direct coupling of the wheel to the shock absorber.
A leverage ratio curve is a graphed quantifiable representation of leverage ratio versus wheel compression distance or percentage of full compression distance. Wheel compression distance, suspension compression, or wheel travel is measured from the center of the wheel at the wheel rotation axis and parallel with the steering axis, with the initial 0 percent measurement taken at full suspension extension with the vehicle unladen. As a suspension is compressed from a state of full extension to a state of full compression at a constant rate, measurements of shock absorber length are taken as the shortest distance between a first shock pivot and a second shock pivot at equal increments of suspension compression. When graphed as a curve on a Cartesian graph, leverage ratio is shown on the Y axis escalating from the x axis in a positive direction, and vertical wheel travel is shown on the X axis escalating from the Y axis in a positive direction.
A motion ratio curve is a graphed quantifiable representation of motion ratio versus wheel compression distance or percentage of full compression distance. Wheel compression distance, suspension compression, or wheel travel is measured from the center of the wheel at the wheel rotation axis and parallel with the steering axis, with the initial 0 percent measurement taken at full suspension extension with the vehicle unladen. As a suspension is compressed from a state of full extension to a state of full compression, measurements of shock absorber length are taken as the shortest distance between a first shock pivot and a second shock pivot at equal increments of suspension compression. When graphed as a curve on a Cartesian graph, motion ratio is shown on the Y axis escalating from the x axis in a positive direction, and vertical wheel travel is shown on the X axis escalating from the Y axis in a positive direction.
In contrast to telescopic suspensions, the disclosed front wheel suspension assembly 12 provides a greater than 1:1 overall leverage ratio between the shock absorber 44 and the shock link 50, due to the indirect coupling of the front wheel 51a and the shock absorber 44. Additionally, because of the movement arcs of the various linkage elements, at any given point during compression, instantaneous leverage ratio and motion ratio can vary non-linearly.
The central axis I of the inshaft 80 of the shock absorber 44 is arranged to form an angle B of between 0° and 20° relative to a central axis F of the fork arm 24, the central axis F of the fork arm 24 being defined by a line formed between the fork arm shock pivot 42 and the fork arm fixed pivot 40. In other embodiments, the central axis I of the inshaft 80 of the shock absorber 44 forms an angle with the central axis F of the fork arm 24 of between 0° and 15°. In other embodiments, the central axis I of the inshaft 80 of the shock absorber 44 forms an angle with the central axis F of the fork arm 24 of between 0° and 30°. The angle B may vary within these ranges during compression and extension.
In some embodiments, the fork arm 24 includes a hollow portion 86 and the shock absorber 44 is located at least partially within the hollow portion 86 of the fork arm 24.
The shock link fixed pivot 52 is offset forward of the central axis I of the inshaft 80 of the shock absorber 44. In other words, the central axis I of the inshaft 80 of the shock absorber 44 is positioned between the shock link fixed pivot 52 and the shock link floating pivot 54 in a plane defined by the central axis I of the inshaft 80, the shock link fixed pivot 52 and the shock link floating pivot 54 (i.e., the plane defined by the view of
A line between the wheel carrier first pivot 64 and the wheel carrier second pivot 66 defines a wheel carrier axis WC, and the wheel mount 68 is offset from the wheel carrier axis WC in a plane defined by the wheel carrier axis WC and the wheel mount 68 (i.e., the plane defined by the view of
In the embodiment of
Returning to
The damper body 89 and the spring body 88 shall be considered to be inline and arranged sequentially along a substantially common central axis when a central axis of the spring body 88 and a central axis of the damper body 89 are offset from one another by a maximum of 100% of the outside diameter of an inshaft 80. In other embodiments, the damper body 89 and the spring body 88 are offset from one another by a maximum of 50% of the outside diameter of the inshaft 80. In other embodiments, the damper body 89 and the spring body 88 are offset from one another by a maximum of 33% of the outside diameter of the inshaft 80. In yet other embodiments, the damper body 89 and the spring body 88 are offset from one another by a maximum of 25% of the outside diameter of the inshaft 80. In a preferred embodiment, the damper body 89 and the spring body 88 share a common central axis.
The inshaft 80 extends from the damper body 89, and an outshaft 90 extends through the damper body 89 and into the spring body 88. The second shock mount 58 is formed at one end of the inshaft 80, and the inshaft 80 is pivotably connected to the shock connection pivot 60 by the second shock mount 58 such that the inshaft 80 and the outshaft 90 are compressible and extendable relative to the damper body 89 as the shock link 50 pivots about the shock link fixed pivot 52. In the embodiments of
Returning now to
Turning to
For example, for each embodiment disclosed herein, when suspension assembly compression is initiated (relative to an uncompressed state), mechanical trail distance T increases. Mechanical trail distance T may increase, for example continuously increase, from a minimum value in the uncompressed state of the suspension assembly to a maximum value in the fully compressed state of the suspension assembly. In other embodiments, mechanical trail distance T may increase initially from the uncompressed state of the suspension assembly to a maximum value at a partially compressed intermediate state of the suspension assembly, and then mechanical trail distance T may decrease from the maximum value as the suspension assembly continues compression from the partially compressed intermediate state to the fully compressed state.
When the disclosed front wheel suspension assembly 12 is at a fully extended state (e.g., uncompressed), as illustrated in
As the front wheel suspension assembly 12 initially begins to compress, the front wheel suspension assembly 12 moves through a partially compressed intermediate state, as illustrated in
The mechanical trail distance T is larger in the partially compressed intermediate state of
As stated above, the increase in mechanical trail distance T as the front wheel suspension assembly 12 compresses advantageously increases wheel stability due to the increased caster effect. Compression is usually experienced during challenging riding conditions, such as braking, cornering, and shock absorbing, all of which benefit from the advantageously increased stability that results from the mechanical trail distance increase observed in the disclosed front wheel suspension assemblies.
As the front wheel suspension assembly 12 moves towards the further compressed state, for example as illustrated in
As a function of suspension compression and link movement, the mechanical trail distance T, and the offset distance 515, vary as the suspension assembly compresses and extends. In some embodiments, the mechanical trail distance T may increase, for example continuously increase, from full extension to full compression. In some embodiments, the increase in mechanical trail distance T may occur at a non constant (e.g., increasing or decreasing) rate.
Turning now to
Advantageously, the rotation sensor 101 measures instantaneous rotation data that may be electronically output to a processor and/or a display for real-time use. The rotation sensor 101 also advantageously measures rotation data from a starting point without the need to be reset before every measurement. As a result, the rotation sensor 101 is capable of measuring a lesser rotation immediately after a greater rotation, without the need to reset the sensor. Additionally, the rotation sensor 101 can average measurements, or output other statistical data from as set of rotational measurement readings.
Turning now to
The pivot assembly 20 is seated in a central aperture 133 of a housing, such as a body of a link 114. The link 114 may be any of the links illustrated above. For example, the link 114 may be the shock link 50, the wheel carrier 60, or the control link 70. The indicator 16 is located about a circumference of the bolt 2, and the indicator 16 includes a first retention feature or protrusion 134, and a pointer 130. The bolt 2 includes a second retention feature or channel 140. In other embodiments, the second retention feature may be located about a circumference of the pivot body 4. While the first retention feature is illustrated as a protrusion 134 and the second retention feature is illustrated as a channel 140, in other embodiments, the protrusion 134 and the channel 140 may be reversed, or other retention features may be used that axially locate the indicator 16 relative to the pivot assembly 20 while allowing rotational movement between the indicator 16 and the pivot assembly 20 when a threshold force is exceeded.
The scale 18 is located on an external component, such as on the housing 114. The housing 114 may be part of a link 122, or in other embodiments, the housing may be part of a frame member, such as the fork arm 124. A bearing 110 is installed in the central aperture 133. The bearing 110 facilitates rotational movement between the pivot assembly 20 and the housing 114. The pivot assembly 20 positions the bearing 110 in radial and axial directions relative to the housing 114 such that any combination of links 122 or frame members 24 can articulate in a pivotable or rotatable manner. The first interference member 134 on the indicator 16 interfaces with, or is partially seated within, the second interference member 140 on the bolt 2, such that the first interference member 134 and second interference member 140 allow rotation of the indicator 16 when enough force is applied to overcome rotational friction and, at the same time, produce enough rotational friction to prevent rotation of the indicator 16 relative to the bolt 2 when sufficient force is not present, thereby maintaining relative positioning between the indicator 16 and the bolt 2 unless sufficient force is applied.
For example, the rotational friction between the first interference member 134 and the second interference member 140 may be overcome to cause the indicator 16 to rotate relative to the bolt 2 when force is applied to the indicator 16 by, for example, an actuator 126 during suspension assembly compression, or to return the indicator 16 to a starting position by force applied by a tool or a finger after suspension assembly is complete. By allowing the indicator 16 to rotate relative to the bolt 2 during suspension assembly compression, and by maintaining the indicator 16 rotational position relative to the bolt 2 when suspension assembly compression is complete, the indicator 16 provides a measurement of maximum suspension assembly compression for a compression event. The measurement may then be used by the rider to adjust suspension assembly characteristics to improve suspension assembly performance. While the first interference member 134 is illustrated as one or more protrusions and the second interface member 140 is illustrated as an annular channel, in other embodiments, the protrusions and the annular channel may be reversed, or other connection structures that produce rotational friction may be used. In some preferred embodiments, the indicator 16 comprises one or more of metal, plastic, composites, and compliant materials, such as natural or synthetic rubbers and urethanes. In other embodiments, the indicator comprises one or more of rubber, aluminum, steel, copper, other metals, fiberglass, carbon fiber, fiber reinforced thermoplastics, urethanes, foam, wood, and bamboo.
Turning now to
The indicator 16 comprises the first retention feature 134, which in the illustrated embodiment is a plurality of protrusions projecting inward into a center opening of the indicator, the pointer 130, which in the illustrated embodiment is a ledge that projects outward from a face of the indicator 16, and a stop member 128, which in the illustrated embodiment is a shoulder that is formed along an outer edge of the indicator 16. The stop member 28 forms a stop or buttress that cooperates with the actuator 126 during suspension assembly compression. The first interference member 134 is sized and shaped to cooperate with the second interference member 140, the protrusions seating within the channel of the second interference member 140. The seating of the first interference member 134 in the second interference member 140 allows rotation of the first interference member 134 relative to the second interference member 140 when sufficient force is applied to overcome the rotational friction between the first interference member 134 and the second interference member 140, which allows rotation of the indicator 16 relative to the bolt 2 (and thus relative to the scale 18) when force is applied to the indicator 16. The frictional interaction between the first interference member 134 and the second interference member 140 also provides enough resistance to hold the indicator 16 in place relative to the bolt 2 (and thus relative to the scale 18) when not being acted upon by outside forces.
The central aperture 165 of the indicator 16 has a center point that is coincident with a central axis of the pivot assembly 20. The pointer 130 is generally linear in shape and when viewed on the face of the indicator 16 forms a chord, intersecting the outer circumference of the indicator at two locations without passing through the center. In other embodiments, the indicator may or may not intersect the outer circumference of the indicator 16. The pointer 130 is offset a distance from the center point of the indicator 16, when viewed face-on. This offset distance 44 allows the user to easily and accurately read the suspension travel.
The link 122 rotates in an arc 164 about the central axis of the pivot assembly 20 during suspension travel (e.g., compression). As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
Turning now to
In alternate embodiments, threads can be either internal or external on the pivot body 4 or on the bolt 2. In other embodiments, the slot 236 can be fully formed about the diameter of the pivot body 4, or formed as a partial slot 236. In yet other embodiments, the slot 236 may be formed in the bolt 2.
As illustrated in the figures, the first and second retention features 134, 140 provide a captured mounting mechanism for the indicator 16, which locates the indicator 16 axially on the bolt 2 while allowing rotational movement between the indicator 16 and the bolt 2 when sufficient force is applied to overcome rotational friction. In certain embodiments, the first retention feature 134 may be any one or more of a tab, a slot, a bump, a hole, a protrusion, a depression, a boss, a flap, or any other type of feature that can mate or interface with a corresponding second retention feature 140. In certain embodiments, the second retention feature 140 may be any one or more of a tab, a slot, a bump, a hole, a protrusion, a depression, a boss, a flap, or any other type of feature that can mate or interface with a corresponding first retention feature 34. Interference features 134, 140 may cooperate with other surfaces or other parts such as the pivot bodies 4, the bolts 2, the links 122, and/or the frame members to allow rotation of the indicator 16 and at the same time allow for enough rotational interference friction that the indicator 16 can be rotated back to an original position by the actuator 126 or by a human finger if registration of a new travel displacement measurement is desired, and also allow for enough rotational interference friction to hold the indicator 16 in place when not being acted upon outside forces, such as the actuator 126 or the human finger, such that a prior travel displacement measurement can be observed and registered.
In certain embodiments, the actuator 126 may be any one or more of a tab, a slot, a bump, a hole, a protrusion, a depression, a boss, a flap, or any other type of feature that can mate or interface with the stop member 128. In certain embodiments, the stop member 128 may be any one or more of a tab, a slot, a bump, a hole, a protrusion, a depression, a boss, a flap, or any other type of feature that can mate or interface with the actuator 126. The actuator 126 and the stop member 128 may cooperate with other surfaces or other parts such as the pivots bodies 4, the bolts 2, the links 122, and/or the frame members to cause rotation of the indicator 16 when there is contact 146 between the actuator 126 and stop member 128.
Turning now to
Similar to the embodiment of
Turning now to
The step 470 of adjusting the component may include changing a characteristic of a shock absorber, a damper, or a combination of a shock absorber and a damper, based on the setpoint value. The characteristic may be a fluid flow rate through the opening in the damper piston, which requires changing a size of the opening based on the setpoint value. In other embodiments, the step of adjusting the component may include changing a characteristic of one of a gas spring or a coil spring. More specifically, the spring constant of the gas or coil spring may be changed by changing the gas pressure in the gas spring, or by changing a spring force produced by a coil spring. The spring force may be changed by changing a spring constant. In the gas spring, the spring constant may be changed by varying gas pressure in the gas spring and/or by changing a gas volume of the gas spring.
By changing a component characteristic of the front wheel suspension assembly based on angular measurements taken by a rotation sensor, a user can quickly and accurately change the setup of the front wheel suspension assembly to suit his or her needs.
The rotation sensor may be connected to any pivot, fixed or floating, or any link in the suspension assembly. Additionally, in other embodiments, the rotation sensor may be one of a magnetic sensor, an optical sensor, an electrical sensor, an accelerometer, a potentiometer, or a resistive sensor. In other embodiments, the rotation sensor may be one of an optical reflective sensor or an optical interrupter sensor. In yet other embodiments, the rotation sensor may be one of a variable reluctance sensor, an eddy current killed oscillator sensor, a Wiegand sensor, or a Hall effect sensor.
Elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions and/or relative positioning of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help to improve understanding of various embodiments of the present invention. Also, common but well-understood elements that are useful or necessary in a commercially feasible embodiment are often not depicted in order to facilitate a less obstructed view of these various embodiments. The same reference numbers may be used to describe like or similar parts. Further, while several examples have been disclosed herein, any features from any examples may be combined with or replaced by other features from other examples. Moreover, while several examples have been disclosed herein, changes may be made to the disclosed examples within departing from the scope of the claims.
A variety of modifications, alterations, and combinations can be made with respect to the above described embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention, and that such modifications, alterations, and combinations are to be viewed as being within the scope of the inventive concept.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 389200 | Clegg | Sep 1888 | A |
| 393387 | Norton | Nov 1888 | A |
| 400727 | Baudreau | Apr 1889 | A |
| 412322 | Copeland | Oct 1889 | A |
| 414048 | Hunter | Oct 1889 | A |
| 423471 | Easthope | Mar 1890 | A |
| 426402 | Torkelson | Apr 1890 | A |
| 435477 | Blackledge | Sep 1890 | A |
| 441649 | Dunlop | Dec 1890 | A |
| 443266 | Bell | Dec 1890 | A |
| 444639 | O'Neill | Jan 1891 | A |
| 447234 | Donnelly | Feb 1891 | A |
| 467794 | Ellis | Jan 1892 | A |
| 468643 | Clement | Feb 1892 | A |
| 524389 | La Casse | Aug 1894 | A |
| 602354 | Ohlgart | Apr 1898 | A |
| 638723 | Kelly | Dec 1899 | A |
| 739476 | Becker | Sep 1903 | A |
| 783236 | Ashburn | Feb 1905 | A |
| 848324 | Sager | Mar 1907 | A |
| 913961 | Levedahl | Mar 1909 | A |
| 927989 | Meiser | Jul 1909 | A |
| 940245 | Gates | Nov 1909 | A |
| 946143 | Levedahl | Jan 1910 | A |
| 953697 | Kuebodeaux | Apr 1910 | A |
| 973071 | Redmond | Oct 1910 | A |
| 979674 | Kittle et al. | Dec 1910 | A |
| 980999 | Pommer | Jan 1911 | A |
| 989638 | Pilgrm | Apr 1911 | A |
| 1000115 | Oquist | Aug 1911 | A |
| 1036263 | Kittle | Aug 1912 | A |
| 1042480 | Ridgway | Oct 1912 | A |
| 1077105 | Stewart | Oct 1913 | A |
| 1096417 | Ekstrom | May 1914 | A |
| 1101614 | Bramham | Jun 1914 | A |
| 1132829 | Cobb | Mar 1915 | A |
| 1144753 | Budroe | Jun 1915 | A |
| 1166156 | Shimmin | Dec 1915 | A |
| 1189874 | Schickel | Jul 1916 | A |
| 1203927 | Stagni | Nov 1916 | A |
| 1213995 | Anderson | Jan 1917 | A |
| 1223572 | Drew | Apr 1917 | A |
| 1227634 | Lake | May 1917 | A |
| 1251992 | Drew | Jan 1918 | A |
| 1254798 | Harley | Jan 1918 | A |
| 1273179 | Perry et al. | Jul 1918 | A |
| 1298958 | Johnston | Apr 1919 | A |
| 1333449 | Russell | Mar 1920 | A |
| 1365524 | Mellantine | Jan 1921 | A |
| 1397850 | Yoxall et al. | Nov 1921 | A |
| 1432376 | Wolff | Oct 1922 | A |
| 1452436 | Pullin | Apr 1923 | A |
| 1475044 | Bloom | Nov 1923 | A |
| 1517146 | Bloom | Nov 1924 | A |
| 1527133 | Harley | Feb 1925 | A |
| 1605680 | Merkel | Nov 1926 | A |
| 1834308 | Harley | Dec 1931 | A |
| 1924363 | Kanai | Aug 1933 | A |
| 1924586 | Zerk | Aug 1933 | A |
| 1999394 | Burnett | Apr 1935 | A |
| 2038011 | Spiegler et al. | Apr 1936 | A |
| 2063704 | Slack | Dec 1936 | A |
| 2073736 | Duffy | Mar 1937 | A |
| 2087299 | Pribil | Jul 1937 | A |
| 2160034 | Schwinn | May 1939 | A |
| 2170565 | Macbeth | Aug 1939 | A |
| 2203342 | Sloman | Jun 1940 | A |
| 2233313 | Hazelroth | Feb 1941 | A |
| 2271304 | Mulholland | Jan 1942 | A |
| 2376788 | Latscher-Latka | May 1945 | A |
| 2462711 | Barnett | Feb 1949 | A |
| 2463310 | Probst | Mar 1949 | A |
| 2464326 | MacGregor | Mar 1949 | A |
| 2475774 | Benson | Jul 1949 | A |
| 2485484 | Dean | Oct 1949 | A |
| 2486430 | Moore | Nov 1949 | A |
| 2489821 | Ryder | Nov 1949 | A |
| 2504452 | Rostan | Apr 1950 | A |
| 2525171 | Franks | Oct 1950 | A |
| 2537679 | Kraeft | Jan 1951 | A |
| 2540585 | Kranz | Feb 1951 | A |
| 2543991 | Schuricht | Mar 1951 | A |
| 2550876 | Spencer | May 1951 | A |
| 2561156 | Thorkildsen | Jul 1951 | A |
| 2588889 | Sherwood | Mar 1952 | A |
| 2596411 | Jordan | May 1952 | A |
| 2636567 | Landrum | Apr 1953 | A |
| 2649312 | Miller | Aug 1953 | A |
| 2660455 | Douglas et al. | Nov 1953 | A |
| 2664644 | Tyerman | Jan 1954 | A |
| 2708112 | Seddon et al. | May 1955 | A |
| 2729465 | Torre | Jan 1956 | A |
| 2751991 | Mennesson | Jun 1956 | A |
| 2752167 | Propst et al. | Jun 1956 | A |
| 2756070 | Torre | Jul 1956 | A |
| 2756832 | Dalrymple | Jul 1956 | A |
| 2855212 | Houser | Oct 1958 | A |
| 2918306 | Lewandoski | Dec 1959 | A |
| 2953395 | Turner | Sep 1960 | A |
| 2969992 | Hahn | Jan 1961 | A |
| 2976056 | Henry | Mar 1961 | A |
| 3083038 | Moulton | Mar 1963 | A |
| 3133748 | Gunnerson | May 1964 | A |
| 3188072 | Wustenhagen et al. | Jun 1965 | A |
| 3433318 | Packard | Mar 1969 | A |
| 3673608 | Voorman, Jr. | Jun 1972 | A |
| 3694004 | Siebers | Sep 1972 | A |
| 3701544 | Stankovich | Oct 1972 | A |
| 2303568 | McWhorter et al. | Dec 1972 | A |
| 3730553 | Harman | May 1973 | A |
| 3774935 | Aldrich | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3942821 | Bock | Mar 1976 | A |
| 3944254 | Inui | Mar 1976 | A |
| 3954284 | Phillips et al. | May 1976 | A |
| 3989261 | Kawaguchi | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4030641 | Bailey et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
| 4057264 | Suzuki et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4058903 | Wilkerson | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4147371 | Morita et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4153237 | Supalla | May 1979 | A |
| 4159123 | Petty | Jun 1979 | A |
| 4162797 | McBride | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4170369 | Strutman | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4179135 | Slater | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4180280 | Doveri | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4184695 | Roe et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4186936 | Offenstadt et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4189168 | Courtney | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4212481 | Ribi | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4242481 | Fannin | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4265329 | de Cortanze | May 1981 | A |
| 4268055 | Bell | May 1981 | A |
| 4295658 | Kashima | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4367882 | Alexander et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4388978 | Fior | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4401316 | Miyakoshi et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4406475 | Miyakoshi et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4408399 | Darwood et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4410196 | Ribi | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4421337 | Pratt | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4422662 | Inoue et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4433850 | Miyakoshi et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4433851 | Miyakoshi et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4437678 | Schultz | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4438909 | Matsumoto | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4444406 | Isono | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4455032 | Kajikawa | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4480711 | Satoh et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4482264 | Kodera | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4520892 | Satoh | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4526249 | Parker | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4531755 | Isono et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4533153 | Tsunoda et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4540190 | Moulton | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4542910 | Watanabe | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4561669 | Simons | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4570963 | Isono | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4572534 | Heyl | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4576393 | Moulton et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4585245 | Rose | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4616810 | Richardson et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4625985 | Nakano et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4629205 | Haynes | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4650027 | de Cortanze | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4660683 | Hayashi et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4685694 | Kouyama | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4702338 | Trema | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4703839 | Yasuo et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4723621 | Kawano et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4732241 | Yoshida | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4738468 | Baron | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4741545 | Honma et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4742884 | Ishikawa | May 1988 | A |
| 4744434 | Miyakoshi et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4770434 | Pietro et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4775163 | McGowan et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4776609 | Pan et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4789174 | Lawwill | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4807898 | Huntly | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4809802 | Seino et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4815763 | Hartmann | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4828069 | Hatsuyama | May 1989 | A |
| 4834412 | Trema | May 1989 | A |
| 4878558 | Asakura | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4881750 | Hartmann | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4890857 | de Cortanze | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4971344 | Turner | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4993734 | Trema | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4997197 | Shultz | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5009451 | Hayashi et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5042608 | Horiike et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5050699 | Savard | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5064212 | Yun | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5069303 | Fuller | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5069467 | Claudio | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5088705 | Tsai | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5133223 | Morri | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5156231 | Trema | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5186481 | Turner | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5193832 | Wilson et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5193833 | Reisinger | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5195766 | Dohrmann et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5219211 | Tsuchida et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5248159 | Moore | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5249650 | Tanaka | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5269549 | Wilson et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5284352 | Chen | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5299820 | Lawwill | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5308099 | Browning | May 1994 | A |
| 5310203 | Chen | May 1994 | A |
| 5320374 | Farris et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5328196 | Ohma | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5350185 | Robinson | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5354085 | Gally | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5359910 | Chang et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5361864 | Tanaka | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5380026 | Robinson | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5403028 | Trimble | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5405159 | Klein et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5409248 | Williams | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5413368 | Pong et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5417446 | Pileggi | May 1995 | A |
| 5427208 | Motobu et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5427397 | Chonan | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5429380 | Lawwill | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5431426 | Ijams et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5441291 | Girvin, III | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5449155 | Mack | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5456480 | Turner et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5462302 | Leitner | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5474318 | Castellano | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5487223 | Krane | Jan 1996 | A |
| D368054 | Behrens et al. | Mar 1996 | S |
| 5498013 | Hwang | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5509674 | Browning | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5509676 | Fukuake et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5564534 | Toyoda et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5599034 | Brigden | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5615756 | Grundei et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5709399 | Smith, Jr. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5720473 | Thomas | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5743547 | Voss et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5743574 | Kohn | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5749590 | Roerig | May 1998 | A |
| 5782313 | Kurawaki et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5799963 | Berkmann | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5810102 | Stewart | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5813684 | Baron | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5829773 | Rajaee | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5855388 | Brewer | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5899478 | Woodside | May 1999 | A |
| 5908200 | Stewart | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5927741 | Chi | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5931487 | Koppelberg et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5931489 | Damman et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5951033 | Winter et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6017047 | Hoose | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6036211 | Nohr | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6047981 | Burrows | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6089585 | Theobald | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6149173 | Bynoe | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6152472 | Woodside | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6155370 | Iwai et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6161858 | Tseng | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6164424 | Girvin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6164675 | Pickering | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6199885 | Seidl | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6241391 | Hoose | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6244609 | Wilson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6260869 | Hanlon et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6260870 | Fan | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6263994 | Eitel | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6311961 | Julia | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6336647 | Iwai et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6357775 | Iwai et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6371263 | Hoose | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6382374 | Iwai et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6386567 | Schonfeld | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6402175 | Jansson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6457732 | Ito et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6485043 | Ito et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6488300 | Ito et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6517095 | Lansac et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6517096 | Yih | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6533305 | Falk | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6783140 | Huang | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6789810 | Strong | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6896276 | Sparrow | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6908092 | Kofuji et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6910702 | Hals | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6918605 | Wada et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6994365 | Kofuji | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7011325 | Kinzler et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7047831 | Reynolds et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7140627 | Wimmer | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7159883 | Mydiarz | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7210695 | Griffiths | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7331594 | Wimmer | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7350787 | Voss | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7364178 | Wimmer | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7425008 | Pokrywka | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7425009 | Namazue et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7434823 | Robinson et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7441622 | Costa | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7635141 | O'Connor | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7699330 | Chen | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7708296 | Becker et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7744107 | Chen | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7887077 | Thiers | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7896379 | Nagao et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 8333528 | Oertley et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8448970 | Vardon | May 2013 | B1 |
| 8534692 | Trebichavsky | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8939458 | Nesbitt, III | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 9194456 | Laird et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9248883 | D'Aluisio | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9278598 | Galasso et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9592838 | Mecklenburg et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
| 9682741 | Fioravanzo et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9707817 | Arnott et al. | Jul 2017 | B1 |
| 9724701 | Harney et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 10053166 | Moriguchi | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10094683 | Przykucki et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
| 10099743 | Walthert et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10196106 | Weagle | Feb 2019 | B1 |
| 10300979 | Weagle | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10308312 | Weagle | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| D859125 | Weagle et al. | Sep 2019 | S |
| D860061 | Weagle et al. | Sep 2019 | S |
| D860062 | Weagle | Sep 2019 | S |
| D861542 | Weagle | Oct 2019 | S |
| 10518836 | Weagle | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10518839 | Weagle | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10526039 | Weagle | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 10526040 | Weagle | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 10537790 | Galasso et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 10549812 | Weagle | Feb 2020 | B2 |
| 10549813 | Weagle | Feb 2020 | B2 |
| 10549815 | Weagle | Feb 2020 | B2 |
| D880369 | Weagle | Apr 2020 | S |
| D880370 | Weagle | Apr 2020 | S |
| D880371 | Weagle | Apr 2020 | S |
| D880372 | Weagle | Apr 2020 | S |
| 10689061 | Weagle | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10894572 | Przykucki et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 10906601 | Aoki et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 11084552 | Weagle | Aug 2021 | B2 |
| 11117635 | Przykucki, Jr. et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
| 11208172 | Weagle | Dec 2021 | B2 |
| 11230346 | Weagle | Jan 2022 | B2 |
| 11230347 | Weagle | Jan 2022 | B2 |
| 11230348 | Weagle | Jan 2022 | B2 |
| 11273887 | Weagle | Mar 2022 | B2 |
| 11345432 | Weagle | May 2022 | B2 |
| 11524744 | Weagle | Dec 2022 | B2 |
| 11945539 | Weagle | Apr 2024 | B2 |
| 20010019197 | Ito et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20020005066 | Tanner et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020079670 | Yih | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020084619 | Odom | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20040036250 | Kofuji | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20050248119 | Callahan et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20080023934 | van Houweling | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080041681 | Shipman | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080060863 | Iizuka | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080258424 | Paul | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080277848 | Davis | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080296863 | Heyl et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080303242 | O'Connor | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090001684 | McAndrews et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090033009 | Kirchner et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090266656 | Murakami | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20100010709 | Song | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100244340 | Wootten et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110012321 | Chen | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110083930 | Laird et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110093930 | Bartel-Kurz et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110156728 | Sato et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110313568 | Blackwell | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120228850 | Tseng | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120248666 | Debruler et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20140061987 | DeBruler et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140202809 | Ozaki et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140316652 | Ericksen et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150183440 | Jackson | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150317065 | Meriaz et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150375823 | Fioravanzo et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160288867 | Murakami | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160339987 | Walthert et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160339989 | Walthert et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20170043818 | Moriguchi | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170087932 | Winshtein et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170198779 | Batsch et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170219041 | Debruler et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170284493 | Smith | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20180281878 | Aoki et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180297435 | Brady et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180304952 | Krugman et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180334219 | Walthert et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20190031275 | Weagle | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190031276 | Weagle | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190031277 | Weagle | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190039681 | Weagle | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190047657 | Weagle | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190047658 | Weagle | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190061865 | Weagle | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190061866 | Weagle | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190061867 | Weagle | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190061868 | Weagle | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190092116 | Magnus et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190168838 | Weagle | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20200079462 | Weagle | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200079463 | Weagle | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200094908 | Weagle | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200094910 | Weagle | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200354012 | Pelot | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20210323632 | Weagle | Oct 2021 | A1 |
| 20210323633 | Weagle | Oct 2021 | A1 |
| 20220097792 | Przykucki, Jr. et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
| 20220153381 | Zawistowski et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
| 20220204123 | Weagle | Jun 2022 | A1 |
| 20220363335 | Weagle | Nov 2022 | A1 |
| 20220363336 | Weagle | Nov 2022 | A1 |
| 20230023390 | Weagle | Jan 2023 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 507753 | Dec 1951 | BE |
| 474575 | Jun 1951 | CA |
| 63758 | Feb 1914 | CH |
| 1309053 | Aug 2001 | CN |
| 2846274 | Dec 2006 | CN |
| 201198348 | Feb 2009 | CN |
| 302966622 | Oct 2014 | CN |
| 303438302 | Nov 2015 | CN |
| 303584666 | Feb 2016 | CN |
| 303604532 | Mar 2016 | CN |
| 304240449 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 304327156 | Oct 2017 | CN |
| 1084599 | Jun 1960 | DE |
| 1122392 | Jan 1962 | DE |
| 3133576 | May 1983 | DE |
| 3223728 | Dec 1983 | DE |
| 8906328 | Nov 1989 | DE |
| 3833880 | Apr 1990 | DE |
| 4119339 | Jan 1992 | DE |
| 9404873 | May 1994 | DE |
| 9403640 | Jun 1994 | DE |
| 9414705 | Feb 1995 | DE |
| 19503047 | Aug 1996 | DE |
| 19635939 | Jun 1997 | DE |
| 19633692 | Feb 1998 | DE |
| 102013004788 | Sep 2013 | DE |
| 49600 | Dec 1934 | DK |
| 0032170 | Feb 1986 | EP |
| 0030306 | Apr 1986 | EP |
| 0125244 | Jan 1987 | EP |
| 0399615 | Nov 1990 | EP |
| 0336891 | Jul 1992 | EP |
| 420610 | Feb 1996 | EP |
| 726198 | Aug 1996 | EP |
| 0744562 | Nov 1996 | EP |
| 0731017 | Oct 1997 | EP |
| 0941916 | Sep 1999 | EP |
| 0992374 | Apr 2000 | EP |
| 1049618 | Sep 2003 | EP |
| 728093 | Nov 2005 | EP |
| 02000398 | Dec 2008 | EP |
| 01884455 | Apr 2009 | EP |
| 2096024 | Sep 2009 | EP |
| 2100807 | Sep 2009 | EP |
| 2357098 | Aug 2011 | EP |
| 02001733 | Dec 2012 | EP |
| 2483141 | Nov 2013 | EP |
| 02913257 | Sep 2015 | EP |
| 347724 | Mar 1905 | FR |
| 353990 | Sep 1905 | FR |
| 350269 | Dec 1905 | FR |
| 376759 | Aug 1907 | FR |
| 467213 | Jun 1914 | FR |
| 547006 | Nov 1922 | FR |
| 559088 | Sep 1923 | FR |
| 28240 | Jan 1925 | FR |
| 636211 | Apr 1928 | FR |
| 902973 | Sep 1945 | FR |
| 972653 | Feb 1951 | FR |
| 1030006 | Jun 1953 | FR |
| 1032268 | Jun 1953 | FR |
| 1059922 | Mar 1954 | FR |
| 1064265 | May 1954 | FR |
| 1067221 | Jun 1954 | FR |
| 1082316 | Dec 1954 | FR |
| 2418742 | Sep 1979 | FR |
| 2494208 | May 1982 | FR |
| 2687976 | Sep 1993 | FR |
| 3004415 | Oct 2014 | FR |
| 166065 | Jul 1921 | GB |
| 223638 | Oct 1924 | GB |
| 238069 | Aug 1925 | GB |
| 239848 | Dec 1925 | GB |
| 258141 | Sep 1926 | GB |
| 264003 | Jan 1927 | GB |
| 279630 | Nov 1927 | GB |
| 302026 | Dec 1928 | GB |
| 322370 | Dec 1929 | GB |
| 469697 | Jul 1937 | GB |
| 585122 | Jan 1947 | GB |
| 585904 | Feb 1947 | GB |
| 586372 | Mar 1947 | GB |
| 691551 | May 1953 | GB |
| 717259 | Oct 1954 | GB |
| 720093 | Dec 1954 | GB |
| 824866 | Dec 1959 | GB |
| 841523 | Jul 1960 | GB |
| 1540824 | Feb 1979 | GB |
| 1545403 | May 1979 | GB |
| 2038736 | Jul 1980 | GB |
| 2052407 | Jan 1981 | GB |
| 2073680 | Oct 1981 | GB |
| 2106843 | Apr 1983 | GB |
| S60-110588 | Jun 1985 | JP |
| S61-124683 | Feb 1986 | JP |
| S61-160380 | Jul 1986 | JP |
| S62-187608 | Aug 1987 | JP |
| 63-112191 | Jul 1988 | JP |
| 649887 | Jan 1989 | JP |
| 1204884 | Aug 1989 | JP |
| 5069875 | Mar 1993 | JP |
| 05-020635 | May 1993 | JP |
| 1999-091671 | Apr 1999 | JP |
| 2000159170 | Jun 2000 | JP |
| 2000159171 | Jun 2000 | JP |
| 2000159177 | Jun 2000 | JP |
| 2000159178 | Jun 2000 | JP |
| 2000168666 | Jun 2000 | JP |
| 10-2009-0117921 | Nov 2009 | KR |
| 416920 | Jan 2001 | TW |
| 484570 | Apr 2002 | TW |
| 568054 | Dec 2003 | TW |
| 596028 | Jun 2004 | TW |
| D111693 | Jul 2006 | TW |
| M335458 | Jul 2008 | TW |
| M354565 | Apr 2009 | TW |
| D140125 | Apr 2011 | TW |
| D149623 | Oct 2012 | TW |
| 2017-22777 | Jul 2017 | TW |
| WO 198200445 | Feb 1982 | WO |
| WO 198400526 | Feb 1984 | WO |
| WO 198701670 | Mar 1987 | WO |
| WO 199523728 | Sep 1995 | WO |
| WO 199746443 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO 199910224 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO 2000013961 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO 2002038437 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO 2019046039 | Mar 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019046040 | Mar 2019 | WO |
| WO 2021066819 | Apr 2021 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Anubi et al., “Variable stiffness suspension system”, Mechanical Sciences, vol. 4:139-151 (2013), www.mech-sci-net/4/139/2013. |
| Black and white photograph of Greeves trials machine, Applicant Admitted Prior Art, Applicant's internal files. |
| Black and white photograph of Scorpion motorcycle, Applicant Admitted Prior Art, Applicant's internal files. |
| Black and white photograph of Silencer motorcycle, Applicant Admitted Prior Art, Applicant's internal files. |
| Color photograph of a cotton TC-70 motorcycle, Applicant Admitted Prior Art, Applicant's internal files. |
| Color photograph of Armstrong bicycle, Applicant Admitted Prior Art, Applicant's Internal Files. |
| Color photograph of Armstrong motorcycle, Applicant Admitted Prior Art, Applicant's internal files. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20230271670 A1 | Aug 2023 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16379386 | Apr 2019 | US |
| Child | 18060721 | US |
