This disclosure relates generally to the field of cycling footwear, more particularly to a cycling shoe.
There are numerous types of cycling shoes which vary in weight, fit and comfort.
One aspect of one embodiment of the invention is the recognition that the stiffness of the cycling shoe is one of the factors that determine the amount of energy transferred from a rider to the bike. By making the shoe stiffer, the amount of energy transferred from the rider to the bike during the pedal stroke can be increased. One of the ways to increase the stiffness of the cycling shoe is to increase the stiffness of the base plate.
Another aspect of one embodiment of the invention is that the energy transfer is influenced not only by the amount of stiffness of the shoe, but also the area in which stiffness is increased. Specifically, in one embodiment the cycling shoe provides strength and stiffness where the cycling shoe is actually applying pressure during a pedal stroke. One aspect of the invention is the recognition that during a pedal stroke the most pressure is applied by the first metatarsal, the big toe, and the heel.
In one embodiment, a clipless cycling shoe has an upper and a base plate. The base plate includes a medial portion, a lateral portion, and a medial sidewall. The medial portion has a rigid support structure having a top portion and a bottom portion, a cavity is formed between the top portion and bottom portion, wherein the cavity is filled with a core material. The lateral portion has a lateral plate. The medial sidewall adjacent the medial portion that extends upward from the medial portion, the medial sidewall extends longitudinally along a portion of the length of the base plate. The medial portion is thicker than the lateral portion.
In other embodiments the core material is a polyurethane foam. The bottom portion can be thicker than the top portion of the support structure. The medial portion can be wider than the lateral portion. The lateral plate can have a uniform thickness. The base plate can have an orifice positioned in a toe section of the lateral portion. The upper can be flexible. The base plate can be carbon fiber. The base plate can be a noncompressible material.
In an alternate embodiment, a clipless cycling shoe has an upper and a base plate. A width of the base plate divided between a lateral portion and a medial portion. The medial portion of the base plate has a rigid support structure has a top portion and a bottom portion, a cavity is formed between the top portion and the bottom portion, and a core material substantially fills the cavity. The lateral portion has a lateral rigid plate. The base plate also has a phalanges section. At the phalanges section, a width of the medial portion is at least the same size or greater than a width of the lateral portion and a thickness of the medial portion is at least 1.75 times greater that a thickness of the medial portion.
In another embodiment at a metatarsal section of the base plate, a width of the medial portion is at least three times greater than a width of the lateral portion and a thickness of the medial portion is at least 2 times greater that a thickness of the medial portion.
In another embodiment at an upper tarsal section of the base plate, a width of the medial portion is at least 1.5 times greater than a width of the lateral portion and a thickness of the medial portion is at least 2 times greater that a thickness of the medial portion.
In another embodiment at a lower tarsal section of the base plate, a width of the medial portion is at least the same size or greater than a width of the lateral portion and a thickness of the medial portion is at least 2.5 times greater that a thickness of the medial portion.
In some embodiments the base plate further comprises a medial sidewall.
Clipless cycling shoes have generally been designed with a symmetrical focus across the base plate or sole. The shoes have generally been designed to have consistent stiffness and rigidity across the medial side and lateral side. To do this, the structure of the shoe on the medial side has been generally symmetric with the structure of the shoe on lateral side. This symmetric design generally yields consistent stiffness and rigidity across the base plate.
The cycling shoe can be designed to focus the weight and strength where the pressure is actually being applied during a pedal stroke. During a pedal stroke the most pressure is applied towards the medial side of the plate, more specifically to the first metatarsal, the big toe, and the heel sections of the base plate. The geometry and structure of the base plate can be reinforced in the areas where the most pressure is applied in order to increase the stiffness, reduce the weight, and increase the fit and comfort of the shoe.
A reinforced medial side with a rigid support structure can increase the stiffness of the shoe and reduce the weight. By focusing more material and increasing the stiffness of the structure on the medial side, the base plate can have a higher stiffness on the portions of the base plate where pressure is applied. A base plate that has higher stiffness and rigidity where pressure is applied yields less flex thereby transferring more power directly from the cyclist's leg and foot to the pedal and the bike. Further by focusing the material on the medial portion and having less material on the lateral portion, the overall weight of the shoe can be reduced even though the effective stiffness is increased.
The stiffness of the base plate can be increased by having sidewalls on the medial and lateral sides of the plate wrap up around the foot and create a “bathtub” style construction. This can increase stiffness; however this bathtub design can be limiting to the fit and comfort of the cyclist's foot. The tall wrapping edges on both sides of the base plate can cause a rigid and restrictive fit that does not accommodate variations in foot shape. Similarly, rigid sidewalls on both sides of the base plate can make it difficult to accommodate different sized feet. For example, wider feet are constrained and restricted by the rigid sides, which can make the shoe uncomfortable and can restrict the flow of blood to the feet during long rides. Feet that are too narrow can shift within the rigid soles of the shoe during cycling because the shoe closure mechanism does not adequately adjust the sizing of the rigid sidewalls.
A rigid sidewall or wrap on the medial side and a substantially flat lateral side can increase the stiffness of the base plate and provide improved fit and comfort for the cyclist's foot. The medial side of the foot is supported by the rigid sidewall and the flexible upper conforms to the lateral side of the foot. The flexible upper provides support and can be adjusted by appropriately accommodate different sized feet. The closure mechanism can be used to adjust the flexible upper to appropriately secure the foot within the shoe. A wider foot can extend off the lateral side of the base plate and be held in place by the upper. A narrower foot can be substantially secured into place by the closure mechanism of the upper.
In this embodiment, the base plate 30 has a skid plate 42 positioned substantially around the top part of the base plate 30. The skid plate 42 can be formed from a rubberized coating, thermoplastic polyurethane, or other suitable material. The skid plate 42 is designed to help protect the toe section of the base plate 46 from being damaged during normal usage. The base plate also has two heel pads 48. The pads 48 can be removable. The pads 48 are configured to protect the base plate of the shoe when the cyclist is walking. In this embodiment the bottom side of the base plate 30 is substantially smooth and does not have tread or other material for traction.
The orifice 44 desirably extends through the base plate. The orifice can provide airflow to the interior of the shoe to cool the foot of the cyclist while riding. In some embodiments the orifice 44 can have a mesh coating that covers the orifice. An insole can also cover the orifice 44. The orifice 44 is desirably sized and shaped to not substantially affect the effective stiffness and rigidity of the shoe that is required for pedaling.
The plurality of cleat mounting holes 46 is desirably positioned in the middle or metatarsal portion of the shoe. There are desirably three holes 46 positioned in a triangular cleat mounting pattern. The three cleat mounting holes 46 are desirably configured in a pattern that fits a plurality of different cleats and clipless pedals.
The medial portion 38 of the base plate 30 desirably has a medial support structure 50. The support structure 50 desirably has a top portion 52 and a bottom portion 54. The bottom portion 54 extends or angles upward toward the top portion 52. A cavity 56 is formed in the support structure 50 between the top portion 52 and the bottom portion 54. In some embodiments the medial support structure 50 is solid does not have a cavity 56. The support structure 50 is formed from a rigid material. A filler or core material 57 can fill the cavity 56. In some embodiments, a core material 57 can be used to increase the stiffness of the base plate 30. In some embodiments, the core material 57 can be a noncompressible lightweight material, such as polyurethane foam. The support structure has a medial side end 60 and a lateral side end 62. The bottom portion 54 ramps up to the top portion 52 on the medial side end. The side wall 36 extends upward from the medial side end of the support structure 50. The bottom portion 54 ramps up to the top portion 52 at the lateral side end. The lateral portion 40 extends outwards from the lateral side end of the support structure 50. The support structure 50 is configured to increase the rigidity and stiffness of the base plate 30. The thickness of the support structure 50 is desirably largest when at medial side end and decreases towards the lateral side end.
The lateral portion 40 is desirably a single plate having a top and bottom surface. The lateral portion desirably merges with the top portion 52 and the bottom portion 54 of the support structure 50. The lateral portion can have a uniform thickness and has the same curvature as the base plate. The bottom surface of the lateral portion desirably intersects with the lateral side end 62 of the medial portion structure 50.
The sidewall 36 portion curves generally upward relative to the medial and lateral portions 38, 40 of the base plate 30. The sidewall 36 desirably merges with the top portion 52 and the bottom portion 54 of the support structure 50 at the medial side end 60. The height and curvature of the sidewall 36 desirably varies along the length of the base plate 30. The height and profile of the sidewall 36 is illustrated in
The structural elements discussed with respect to the sidewall, medial, and lateral portions apply generally to the base plate 30. The widths and proportions of the medial portions and the lateral portions can vary along the length of the base plate 30. By way of example,
The base plate 30 is described herein as having different portions and/or structures, such as the medial, lateral, and sidewall portions. These conventions are used to describe the structure of the base plate and are not to be construed to limit the disclosure to a base plate having separate components with explicit structural boundaries. The medial, lateral, and sidewall portions can be formed and fabricated as a single structure.
At the cleat section 90, the width of the medial portion 92 can be at least five times greater than the width of the lateral portion 94. The thickness of the medial portion 93 can be at least two times greater than the thickness of the lateral portion 95. In one embodiment the medial portion has a width of 73 mm and a thickness that ranges from approximately 6.00 mm to 4.35 mm, and the lateral side has a width of 11 mm and a thickness of 1.70 mm.
Different embodiments and different size cycling shoes can have different dimensions for the medial and lateral portions at the different sections, but the relative ratios between the medial and lateral portion can be substantially the same.
Although this invention has been disclosed in the context of certain preferred embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. In addition, while a number of variations of the invention have been shown and described in detail, other modifications, which are within the scope of this invention, will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art based upon this disclosure. It is also contemplated that various combinations or sub-combinations of the specific features and aspects of the embodiments may be made and still fall within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, it should be understood that various features and aspects of the disclosed embodiments can be combined with or substituted for one another in order to form varying modes of the disclosed invention. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims that follow.
Similarly, this method of disclosure, is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that any claim require more features than are expressly recited in that claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in a combination of fewer than all features of any single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the claims following the Detailed Description are hereby expressly incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4316334 | Hunt | Feb 1982 | A |
4547979 | Harada et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4825565 | Bigolin | May 1989 | A |
5406723 | Okajima | Apr 1995 | A |
5446977 | Nagano et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5836094 | Figel | Nov 1998 | A |
5924220 | Ueda et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5943795 | Ueda et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6018889 | Friton | Feb 2000 | A |
6055746 | Lyden et al. | May 2000 | A |
6108943 | Hudson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6260291 | Farys | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6286232 | Snyder et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6568102 | Healy et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6966131 | McCracken et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7191550 | Baek | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7882648 | Langvin | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8171655 | Morgan | May 2012 | B2 |
8567095 | Ellis | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20010022041 | Gebhard | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20050278980 | Berend et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060059724 | Garneau | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070017127 | Chao et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070113428 | Jau et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080276496 | Kerns et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295362 | White | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090193682 | Rosenbaum | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090199432 | Park | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100199523 | Mayden et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110061264 | Solymosi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110107622 | Schwirian | May 2011 | A1 |
20110302809 | Kim | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120227287 | Czan | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130019505 | Borel et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0795280 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0741529 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1685772 | Aug 2006 | EP |
2008307199 | Dec 2008 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Combined Search and Examination Report; dated: Jan. 29, 2015; 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140007463 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |