The invention relates to cyclonic separating apparatus. Particularly, but not exclusively, the invention relates to cyclonic separating apparatus suitable for use in a vacuum cleaner.
Cyclonic separating apparatus is known, for example, from EP 0 042 723 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,160,356. Both examples show domestic vacuum cleaners which operate using reverse flow cyclones to achieve particle separation. Such apparatus generally provides a cyclone body having a tangential inlet. Dirt-laden fluid flow enters the inlet and follows a helical path around the interior of the cyclone body. Centrifugal forces act on the entrained dirt to separate the dirt from the flow. The separated dirt collects at the base of the cyclone body for subsequent removal from the apparatus. The cleaned flow then changes direction and flows back up the cyclone body to exit the cyclone body via a centrally located outlet provided at the same end of the cyclone body as the inlet. Axial flow cyclonic separators can be used as an alternative to reverse flow cyclonic separators in which the cleaned flow exits the cyclone body at the same end of the cyclone body as the separated dust.
It is a known advantage to have a number of cyclones working in parallel within cyclonic separating apparatus. Each individual cyclone is small in comparison to that used in an equivalent single cyclone apparatus. The relatively small size of each individual cyclone has the effect of increasing the centrifugal force acting on particles entrained in the airflow passing through the cyclone body. This increase in the force results in an increase in the separation efficiency of the apparatus.
Cyclones can be prone to blocking. In particular, small cyclones are more likely to become blocked because there is a smaller area for the dust to pass through. Such blockages can cause a reduction in flow which has the overall effect of reducing the separation efficiency. A substantial blockage may completely stop the flow from passing through the cyclone.
It is an object of the present invention to provide cyclonic separating apparatus in which the risk of blockage of a cyclone is reduced.
The invention provides cyclonic separating apparatus comprising at least one cyclone, the cyclone having a first end and a second end, an inlet being located at the first end for introducing a fluid flow into the cyclone, a cone opening being located at the second end, the cyclone further comprising a longitudinal axis, wherein at least part of the cone opening lies in a plane inclined at an angle to the longitudinal axis. The configuration of the cone opening provides a greater area for the dirt to pass through which helps to prevent blockages occurring in the cyclone.
Preferably, the plane is inclined at an angle of between 40° and 80° to the longitudinal axis. More preferably, the plane is inclined at an angle of substantially 60° to the longitudinal axis. It has been found that at this angle cone blocking is less likely to occur and there is no increased risk of the separated dust being re-entrained.
In a preferred embodiment, the cyclone projects into the collector. This enables any dust which has been separated from the flow to be contained and so prevented from passing into the surrounding atmosphere. The contained dust can then be emptied from the collector in a safe and hygienic manner. Preferably, the collector has a portion having a substantially circular cross section, the diameter of the said portion being at least three times the diameter of the cone opening. More preferably, the said portion lies in a plane which intersects the cone opening. In this configuration, the separation performance may be optimised and the dust collected more efficiently.
The invention is particularly suited to use with a plurality of cyclones. The effect of passing the dust laden flow through a plurality of cyclones arranged in parallel is to enhance the separation efficiency of the apparatus. It is an advantage to have all of the cyclones communicating with a single collector to ensure that all of the dust separated from the flow can be disposed of easily and efficiently.
In this case, it is preferred that the cone opening has a lowermost portion which extends furthest from the first end of the cyclone and the said lowermost portion faces the wall of the collector. In this orientation, it is believed that separation of the entrained dust is optimised and the risk of cone blocking is reduced.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
A side wall 26 tapers inwardly towards the longitudinal axis 18 from the first end 14 towards the second end 16 to form a frusto-conical portion 28. A cone opening 30 is formed at a free end of the frusto-conical portion 28. The cone opening 30 lies in a plane 32 inclined at an angle α to the longitudinal axis 18. The angle α shown in
In a second embodiment, shown in
In use, a dust-laden fluid flow enters the separating apparatus 10 via the inlet 20. The fluid flow is caused to follow a helical path around the interior of the cyclone 12 from the first end 14 downwardly towards the second end 16 and through the cone opening 30. The frusto-conical portion 28 causes the angular velocity of the fluid flow to increase which in turn causes a significant proportion of larger particles originally entrained in the fluid flow to become separated from the main body of the fluid flow and to become deposited in the collector 50. Due to the configuration of the cone opening 30, the particles can pass easily through the cone opening 30 and into the collector 50. There is a reduced risk of the particles collecting in the area of the cone opening 30 and causing a blockage. The cleaned fluid flow forms a vortex along the longitudinal axis 18 of the cyclone 12 and exits the cyclone 12 by way of the outlet 22. Any particles remaining in the fluid flow can be separated therefrom by providing at least one additional cyclone or filter downstream of the outlet 22 (not shown).
A third embodiment of the invention is shown in
A fourth embodiment of the invention is shown in
A specific arrangement of parallel cyclones is shown in
Different arrangements of parallel cyclones are contemplated.
The invention is not intended to be limited to the precise features of the embodiments described above. Other variations and modifications will be apparent to a skilled reader. It is intended that the cyclonic separating apparatus would be incorporated into a vacuum cleaner but it will be appreciated that the apparatus may also be utilised in any other suitable particle separation apparatus.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0203723.2 | Feb 2002 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB03/00503 | 2/4/2003 | WO | 00 | 1/11/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO03/068407 | 8/21/2003 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1505166 | Rupp | Aug 1924 | A |
2134978 | Marshall | Jan 1938 | A |
4451358 | Chupka | May 1984 | A |
5160356 | Dyson | Nov 1992 | A |
6174339 | Varady | Jan 2001 | B1 |
20050050864 | Oh et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
450430 | Aug 1948 | CA |
619363 | May 1961 | CA |
1060355 | Aug 1979 | CA |
1251147 | Mar 1989 | CA |
2295692 | Jan 1999 | CA |
1679609 | Jul 1954 | DE |
0 042 723 | Dec 1981 | EP |
2360719 | Mar 2001 | GB |
2000084438 | Mar 2000 | JP |
WO 9835601 | Aug 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050102982 A1 | May 2005 | US |