The invention relates to sampling of pressurized process fluids for on-stream and spot sampling of pressurized process fluid such as natural gas or the like having liquid entrained therein, or otherwise referenced as multiphase or “wet”. The preferred embodiment of the present invention contemplates a cyclonic filtration apparatus integrated into a sample probe formed for insertion into a pressurized process fluid stream, the present system formed to separate and exclude entrained liquids in the process gas stream, preventing same from entering the sample stream.
Natural gas is bought and sold based on its heating value. It is the BTU content that determines the monetary value of a given volume of natural gas. This BTU value is generally expressed in decatherms (one million BTU). In the determination of total heat value of a given volume of gas, a sample of the gas is analyzed and from the composition its heat value per unit volume is calculated. This value is generally expressed in BTU/cu ft. The typical range of transmission quality gas ranges between 1000 and 1100 BTU/cu ft. Production gas, storage facility gas, NGL, and new found Shale Gas can have much higher heating values up to or even exceeding 1500 BTU/cu ft.
There has been a long standing controversy between gas producers and gas transporters regarding entrained liquid typically present in most high BTU/cu ft. gas (rich or “wet” gas). Transporter tariffs require essentially liquid-free gas. Hydrocarbon liquid in the gas being transported causes operational and safety problems. The practice is to separate the liquid before entering a transport (pipe) line.
The API 14.1 standards (Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards, 2006) scope does not include supercritical fluid (dense phase) or “wet gas” “(a term referenced by the Natural Gas industry as a gas that is at or below its hydrocarbon dew point temperature and/or contains entrained liquid), nor does the GPA 2166 standard (Obtaining Natural Gas Samples for Analysis by Gas Chromatography, 2005). In summary, there is no known standard which defines how to obtain a “representative sample” of a natural gas supply having entrained hydrocarbon in any form.
Therefore to fully comply with the current industry standards, there exists a compelling need to effectively prevent entrained liquids from entering sample systems. Membrane-tipped probes such as the A+ Corporation Genie Probe (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,357,304, U.S. Pat. No. 6,701,794, U.S. Pat. No. 6,904,816, U.S. Pat. No. 7,004,041, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,134,318) have been used for many years to shed entrained liquids inside pressurized pipelines. However, these systems can be overwhelmed with excessive liquid loading, causing the maximum allowable differential pressure to be exceeded, which tends to force liquids through the coalescing elements, and into the sample system.
The differential pressure needed to force liquids through the coalescing elements is a function of the surface tension of the liquid as well as the construction of the coalescing element. This can be further complicated by the use of various liquid chemicals, which are routinely injected into the process, gas such as corrosion inhibitors, amine and carbon dioxide inhibitors, as well as chemicals meant to dry the gas, like alcohols and glycols.
These liquid chemicals may have low surface tensions and may penetrate coalescing elements, in which case said liquid chemicals may combine with the sample, or lower the surface tension of entrained liquids at the coalescing membrane, making it easier for the said undesired liquids to penetrate and get past some coalescing elements. Also, some coalescing elements may have temperature limitations, and thus may be impractical for some applications.
Further, coalescing membranes or the like may have to be changed periodically as a maintenance precaution to insure reliable operation. Accordingly there is a need for a physical pre-filter to eliminate the bulk of the liquid entrained in the gas which would operate in a variety of conditions with little maintenance, and which is more reliable in operation than current systems.
Cyclonic separation techniques have been utilized in a variety of capacities for over 100 years. A typical cyclonic separator channels a fluid stream through a housing having a geometry formed to generate a vortex, exploiting centrifugal force with gravity and pressure differentials to separate liquid particles from gaseous streams, as well as other applications.
Cyclone-type pre-filters have been used for many decades. For example, D. W. Birnstingl describes a measuring head for a conductivity meter combining a conductivity cell with a cyclone filter to filter liquid in U.S. Pat. No. 3,471,775 filed in 1966.
UOP Inc. of Des Plains, Ill., describe a sampling probe that uses a V-shaped shield to pre-filter particles from sample (see U.S. Pat. No. 4,481,833 from 1984). Another company, Anarad Inc. of Santa Barbara, Calif., describes a filter probe for stack gas that uses an inertial filter with a constant bypass flow requirement to remove dust without clogging (U.S. Pat. No. 5,237,881 from 1993). The University of Akron describes a cyclone collection vessel combined with filter media for separation of a suspension (U.S. Pat. No. 6,210,575 from 2001). M & C Products Analysis Technology, Inc. of Ventura, Calif., describes an in situ particle separation system with filter media for separating particles from gas samples (U.S. Pat. No. 7,337,683 from 2008).
More recently, the General Electric Company of Schenectady, N.Y. describes sample probe for removing particles from a gas stream using a shield and a flow reversal technique (U.S. Pat. No. 8,087,308 from 2012). These devices are not used to remove entrained liquids from gas samples. No one in industry has contemplated using the cyclone technology to solve the problem of entrained liquids in natural gas samples.
Dekati Ltd of Finland offers the CYCLONE brand cyclonic separator for removal of large particles from a Sample Stream. This device is designed to be placed in a flue gas flow in a stack as well as exterior to the stack. In either instance, an isokinetic sampling probe is utilized to draw the sample. Various isokinetic nozzles are available and may be utilized interchangeably, depending upon the circumstances of use.
Other types of fluid separators may include:
A+ Corporation makes a self-cleaning filter under the trademark TORNADO (for example, model 602). It is an external cyclone type filter. Another external cyclonic filter is made by Collins Products Co, maker of the SWIRLKLEAN brand bypass filter which also uses a cyclone-type filter external to the pipeline, situated upstream the analyzer, although the SWIRLKLEAN system does not utilize gravity separation, instead exploiting a bypass technique as detailed at http://www.collins-products.com/.
To summarize, the prior art teaches various systems for removing liquid particulates or the like from a gaseous fluid stream. Removal of such entrained liquid is imperative as a component of gas analysis as detailed above, although such systems are imperfect and many designs can be overwhelmed by a liquid slug or the like. Anytime liquid is removed from the source and transported into the sample system, the liquid distorts the true composition of the sample.
However, due to shortcomings in the above systems there remains a long felt, but unresolved need for a system with the ability to reliably prevent liquids from overwhelming the separator to prevent liquid from entering the sample system, thus preventing sample distortion and contamination, which can equate to wrong analysis and very costly incorrect monetary exchanges. This is especially true at custody transfer points for both producers and transporters.
It would therefore be an improvement over the art to provide a system which does not require a bypass stream and with the required venting to the atmosphere or the ground, an undesirable requirement of several of the above referenced systems.
The present invention solves many of the shortcomings of prior art systems addressed supra. Unlike the known prior art systems, the present invention solves the problems discussed above. The device of the present invention is inserted into the pressurized pipeline to prevent liquids from entering the sample system. It does not require a bypass stream vented to the atmosphere, nor does it require any drain of liquids exterior to the pipeline which might otherwise occur onto the ground, or piped to a flare.
Rather, the present device prevents entrained liquids at the tip of the probe, thus ensuring that no liquids pass through to the sample probe and that a single gas-phase sample is taken. Further, the present invention also reduces or may even eliminate the need for filter elements that must be replaced or cleaned. It protects the entire sample system from contamination that otherwise would require costly downtime for cleaning or replacement. By preventing undesired liquids from entering the sample, the present lessens the likelihood of sample distortion and flawed analysis, especially when utilizing the current API and GPA sampling standards.
A first, preferred embodiment of the present invention, as illustrated in
A second embodiment utilizes the cyclone filter at the tip of a sample probe that is insert-able under pressure into pressurized pipelines like the first embodiment, but without any filter or coalescing element of any type behind the cyclone filter (
The inlet opening size, and length and diameter of the conical section, as well as the outlet and drain diameters of the probe tip may need to be properly proportioned to optimize the flow-to-filter ratio of the cyclone filter probe tip. This ratio must properly sized, taking into account the normal analytical flow rate in a gas or vapor only single phase sample so that the cyclone filter supplies the appropriate flow of sample. Further, the passageways must also be sized so that when liquid slugs are present, the cyclone filter can remove the liquid prior to entering the sample stream intended for the analyzer.
A third embodiment comprises a more permanent installation wherein a fixed probe is installed in a manner which would typically require a meter run section of pipeline or so to be depressurized for insertion and installation (
The coalescing element downstream of the cyclone filter could be sintered plastic or metal or spun borosilicate glass or membrane material. A fourth embodiment would be various combinations of probe elements with the cyclone filter.
For a further understanding of the nature and objects of the present invention, reference should be had to the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like parts are given like reference numerals, and wherein:
The first embodiment 1 of the present invention (
Accordingly, if a slug of liquid 14 is present in the sample stream entering the cyclone filter, said cyclone filter 8, in combination with the coalescing element 12, effectively diminishes or even fully prevents said large slug of liquid 14 (or any residual liquid therefrom) from entering via probe the sample passage 6 leading to the sample system.
As shown in
Situated between the insert 19 and the and the connection 28 section is a base 27 having an outer diameter 20 formed to engage inner diameter of cylindrical cavity 35 formed in sleeve 34 forming an internal barrier 7. An o-ring 31 or other seal is formed to sealingly engage groove 32 in mounting section 33 and groove 32′ of sleeve 34. Also formed within sleeve 34, engaging the distal end of cylindrical cavity 35 is a conical cavity 10 having an inverted apex in the form of a drain 11 at the second end 30′ of sleeve.
Continuing with
A portion of the fluid flow exits 23 via the outlet 9′ opposite inlet 9, the remaining flow spiraling down 24 the clearance 17 between internal barrier 7 and housing 21, down along the outer surface of internal barrier 7 to engage the lower inverted cone-shaped portion 10, which forms a cyclonic chamber to facilitate cyclonic action and fluid-liquid separation so that a gas or vapor only sample is drawn upward 18 through the lower pressure center of the vortex 22 to pass through fluid flow outlet 15, out of the cyclone filter/separator an, in the case of the first embodiment (
Any liquid particulates in the fluid stream are thereby cyclonically extracted from the stream and drain through drain port 11 at the base thereof, with any residual liquid taken out by coalescing element 12 downstream therefrom.
The illustration of the cylindrical insert 19 forming internal barrier 7 is not meant to limit the cyclone filter or separator design to have the cylindrical configuration as shown in
The inlet opening size and the length and diameter of the conical section and internal barrier as well as the outlet and drain diameters of the probe tip may need to be sized for the flow to filter ratio of the cyclone filter probe tip. This ratio must be sized correctly so that under normal analytical flow rates in a gas or vapor only single phase sample, the cyclone filter supplies the appropriate flow of sample. Then the passageways must also be sized so that when liquid slugs are present, the cyclone filter can remove the liquid in sample intended for the analyzer. The material of construction of the coalescing element may be application dependent (i.e. may depend on process fluid, analytical flow rate thru probe, the properties of the type of liquid entrained, etc.). Further, the cyclonic chamber may be frustoconical, the inverted end having a drain passage formed therethrough.
A second embodiment would utilize a cyclone filter 8 at the tip of a sample or insertion probe 2 that is insertable under pressure into pressurized pipelines (
A third embodiment 16 would be a fixed probe that requires a meter run section of pipeline to be depressurized for insertion and installation (
A fourth embodiment would be a combination of the cyclone filter 8 with the coalescing element 12, along with a pressure reducing device 37 downstream, shown in
The embodiments listed are not intended to be an exhaustive list of applications for the cyclone filter but only intended to show the need and some of the practical applications of the invention.
# Description
The invention embodiments herein described are done so in detail for exemplary purposes only, and may be subject to many different variations in design, structure, application and operation methodology. Thus, the detailed disclosures therein should be interpreted in an illustrative, exemplary manner, and not in a limited sense.
The present invention claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/076,472 filed Nov. 6, 2014, entitled “Cyclonic System for Enhanced Separation in Fluid Sample Probes and the Like”, listing Valmond Joseph St Amant, III as inventor.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3014553 | Jerman | Dec 1961 | A |
3471775 | Birnstingl | Oct 1969 | A |
3581467 | Donnelly | Jun 1971 | A |
3778977 | Conn | Dec 1973 | A |
3831452 | Pittenger | Aug 1974 | A |
4481833 | Bajek | Nov 1984 | A |
4497714 | Harris | Feb 1985 | A |
4586390 | Helke | May 1986 | A |
4624779 | Hurner | Nov 1986 | A |
4838906 | Kiselev | Jun 1989 | A |
5237881 | Ross | Aug 1993 | A |
5579803 | Welker | Dec 1996 | A |
5698014 | Cadle | Dec 1997 | A |
5755965 | Reiber | May 1998 | A |
5777241 | Evenson | Jul 1998 | A |
6003362 | Dieckmann | Dec 1999 | A |
6210575 | Chase et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6284547 | Schafer | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6332356 | Hecht | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6357304 | Mayeaux | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6701794 | Mayeaux | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6764536 | Welker | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6818045 | Welker | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6851309 | Lenzing | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6904816 | Mayeaux | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7004041 | Mayeaux | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7097693 | Mayeaux | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7134318 | Mayeaux | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7337683 | DeFriez et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7907693 | Bae et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8087308 | Gauthier et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8176766 | Ruiz | May 2012 | B1 |
8904886 | Mayeaux | Dec 2014 | B1 |
9410871 | St Amant, III | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9766163 | Knight | Sep 2017 | B2 |
20010015093 | Kempe | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020036167 | Mayeaux | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20050223829 | Mayeaux | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20070068223 | Chen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070128079 | Counts | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080307901 | Knight | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090107532 | Lonne | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20110185892 | Smith | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110308311 | Dalla Betta | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000366 | Nixdorff | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20140076027 | Nicholson | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150377750 | Scipolo | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20170102298 | Knight | Apr 2017 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Collins Products Co, Collins Products Company Catalog, Jan. 2008, 60 pages. |
Dekati LTD of Finland, Dekati Cyclone product brochure, Aug. 2014, origin unknown. |
Author Unknown, Cyclonic Separation, Wikipedia, Oct. 15, 2014, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclonic_separation. |
Collins Products Co, Collins Products Company website image, 2014, www.collins-products.com. |
A+ Corp, Tornado 602 Brochure, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62076472 | Nov 2014 | US |