This invention relates generally to a method for selective cutout of one or more cylinders of an engine and, more particularly, to a method for determining a fluctuation of an engine parameter and selectively disabling one or more cylinders in response to the fluctuation.
It has long been known that one or more cylinders of a multiple cylinder engine may be disabled from normal operation, i.e., cutout, to achieve a desired objective. For example, it is a widely followed practice to periodically cutout a cylinder for a brief period of time to monitor resultant engine operating conditions and thus determine if the cylinder and associated components are functioning within acceptable limits.
Cylinder cutout techniques may be employed for other purposes as well. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,009,857, Hasler et al. disclose a system in which one or more cylinders are disabled to reduce the occurrence of white smoke. Engine speed and coolant temperature are monitored and when conditions exist which would cause white smoke, a fractional percentage of the cylinders are cutout.
There are engine operating conditions which may exist in which an engine may run unstable, i.e., the speed of the engine may fluctuate more than allowable from a desired speed. For example, an engine running at an idle speed, e.g., a marine engine at idle, may tend to fluctuate from the desired idle speed due to nonlinearities associated with operating parameters such as fuel delivery. These fluctuations in speed are often undesirable and it would be preferable to cause the engine to operate under more linear portions of operating curves to reduce the fluctuations.
The present invention is directed to overcoming one or more of the problems as set forth above.
In one aspect of the present invention a method for controlling operation of an engine having a plurality of cylinders is disclosed. The method includes the steps of monitoring a parameter associated with engine operation, determining a range of fluctuation of the parameter from a desired parameter value, and selectively disabling operation of at least one cylinder and less than all of the plurality of cylinders in response to the range of fluctuation being greater than a predetermined threshold.
In another aspect of the present invention a method for controlling operation of an engine having a plurality of cylinders and a corresponding one of a plurality of fuel injectors for each cylinder is disclosed. The method includes the steps of monitoring a parameter associated with engine operation, determining a range of fluctuation of the parameter from a desired parameter value, selectively disabling a delivery of fuel from at least one fuel injector and less than all of the plurality of fuel injectors to a corresponding at least one cylinder in response to the range of fluctuation being greater than a predetermined threshold, and increasing a delivery of fuel from a normal operating value to an increased operating value from each of the remaining enabled fuel injectors to each corresponding enabled cylinder.
In yet another aspect of the present invention a method for controlling operation of an engine having a plurality of cylinders is disclosed. The method includes the steps of monitoring a speed of the engine, determining a range of fluctuation of the engine speed from a desired engine speed, selectively disabling operation of at least one cylinder and less than all of the plurality of cylinders in response to the range of fluctuation being greater than a predetermined threshold, and enabling operation of each of the plurality of cylinders in response to the range of fluctuation being less than the predetermined threshold.
Referring to the drawings, a method for controlling operation of an engine 102 is shown. With particular reference to
Associated with each cylinder 104 is a piston 106, for example six pistons 106a–f. Each piston 106 may be drivably connected to a connecting rod 108. Thus, the six cylinder engine 102 of
Each cylinder 104 may receive fuel by way of a fuel injector 110. As
A controller 112 may receive information regarding a parameter associated with engine operation, e.g., a parameter associated with a speed of the engine 102. More specifically, the controller 112 may receive signals from a speed sensor 118 by way of a sensor signal line 120. Examples of speed sensors suited for use include, but are not limited to, angular position sensors at a location near a crankshaft or drive train, detonation sensors located near a cylinder, and the like.
Alternatively, the controller 112 may receive information indicative of parameters other than engine speed, e.g., fuel delivery information, engine load information, and the like, and may determine engine speed from the received information.
The controller 112 may be further configured to deliver command information to the fuel injectors 110a–f by way of respective control signal lines 117a–f. Control signals may include such information as timing commands for fuel injection, current duration commands for duration of injection of fuel, injector enable and disable commands, and the like.
Referring to
Operation of the fuel injector 110 may be characterized by stable delivery of fuel when the current duration is high enough to place operation on the flat portion 206. More specifically, a variation in current duration Δx2 may result in a corresponding small variation in fuel delivery Δy2. However, when operation is below the knee portion 210, i.e., on the steep portion 208, delivery of fuel may become unstable. For example, a variation in current duration Δx1 of the same magnitude as Δx2 results in a variation in fuel delivery Δy1 that is much greater than Δy2. It is thus preferred to maintain current duration in the flat portion 206 of the curve 204, i.e., above the knee portion 210.
Referring to
In a first decision block 302, an operating condition of the engine 102 is determined. More particularly, it is determined whether the engine 102 is in a no load idle condition. The no load condition may correspond to the engine 102 being in neutral. For example, a marine engine may be required to operate at no load and at idle for periods of time before actuating a throttle and applying a load to the engine.
Continuing with the example of a marine engine, typical engines of this type may not have a direct means to determine when the engine is in neutral. An alternative method may be to monitor fuel delivery, since fuel delivery may be based on throttle position and load. When fuel delivery levels fall below a specified value, it may be determined that the engine is in neutral. In addition, when the engine speed falls below another specified value, it may be determined that the engine is at idle. Under these circumstances, it may be determined that the operating condition of the engine is in a no load idle condition. Fuel delivery may be monitored by monitoring command signals for fuel delivery, such as current duration, injector on-time, and the like.
If a no load idle condition is determined, control proceeds to a first control block 304, in which the speed of the engine 102 is monitored, for example by a signal from a speed sensor 118 as described above. In a second control block 306, fluctuations in engine speed are determined. The fluctuations in engine speed may be indicative of fluctuations in fuel delivery, as shown in the graph 204 of
In a second decision block 308, it is determined whether the engine speed fluctuations exceed a threshold. For example, a desired engine speed at idle may be 550 rpm. It may be established that a range of fluctuation from 540 rpm to 560 rpm may be allowed as a threshold range. Thus, if it is found that the range of fluctuation is from 530 rpm to 570 rpm, it would be determined that the predetermined threshold has been exceeded.
If the threshold is exceeded, control proceeds to a third control block 310, in which one or more cylinders are cutout. For example, if the engine has six cylinders, one, two, or three cylinders may be cutout. Referring briefly to
The controller 112 continues to monitor the engine operating condition and, in a third decision block 312, if it is determined that a load has been applied, e.g., the engine is no longer in neutral, control proceeds to a fourth control block 314, in which all cylinders are enabled for normal operation.
Other aspects can be obtained from a study of the drawings, the disclosure, and the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4489684 | Yamada | Dec 1984 | A |
4492191 | Aoki et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4781160 | Lohr et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4962740 | Fujimoto et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4967727 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5035220 | Uchinami et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5579736 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5645032 | Motose | Jul 1997 | A |
5758616 | Motose | Jun 1998 | A |
5797371 | Nonaka | Aug 1998 | A |
5826563 | Patel et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827150 | Mukumoto | Oct 1998 | A |
5868116 | Betts et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5899189 | Adelsperger et al. | May 1999 | A |
5970951 | Ito | Oct 1999 | A |
6009857 | Hasler et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6098592 | Hess et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6125812 | Garabedian | Oct 2000 | A |
6158218 | Herold et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6336440 | Schmitz et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6367443 | Bassi et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6401684 | Hori et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6435156 | Copus | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6484686 | Ordanic | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6520158 | Mills | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6823835 | Dunsworth et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
20010013330 | Grizzle et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
126236 | May 1993 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040177836 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |