The present disclosure relates to a cylinder liner for an internal combustion engine and method for making a cylinder liner.
This introduction generally presents the context of the disclosure. Work of the presently named inventors, to the extent it is described in this introduction, as well as aspects of the description that may not otherwise qualify as prior art at the time of filing, are neither expressly nor impliedly admitted as prior art against this disclosure.
Cylinder liners for combustion engines made from, for example, cast iron, provide improved wear resistance in engine blocks that may be formed from lightweight materials, such as, for example, an aluminum alloy. These cylinder liners may be placed within an engine block mold and the engine block material may be cast around the cylinder liners. The cylinder liners are then embedded within and define the cylinder bores within the engine block. These liners are known as a “cast in place” type of liner.
It is important to maintain a strong bond between the liner and the block to prevent the liner from moving, to prevent or resist deformation during operation, and to improve thermal conductivity between the liner and the engine block. Cylinder liners which are known to provide an excellent mechanical and thermal bond include a rough exterior surface. These liner surfaces may be referred to as having an “as-cast,” “spiny,” or a rough cast surface. An example of such an “as-cast” surface may provide spines, mushrooms and crevices on the outside surface of the liner. Liners including exemplary “as-cast” surfaces may be provided by various manufacturers. One exemplary manufacturer, TPR Kabushiki Kaisha, holds a trademark registration for AsLock® for a cylinder liner under which they provide a liner having an as-cast external surface. Other manufacturers providing similar cylinder liners having a similar as-cast surface include Mahle, Federal Mogul and others.
Exemplary cylinder liners having an “as-cast” surface may include surface projections which extend between about 0.3 to 0.7 millimeters in depth on the external surface of the liner and are generally produced using a centrifugal casting process. In contrast, other types of liners are typically manufactured by machining a cast tube. This results in a smooth machined external surface, or a threaded or specifically patterned external surface such as, for example, a cross-hatched external surface, they are intended to be pressed into place in a previously cast engine block or may be “cast-in-place”.
Other types of interfaces between the cylinder liner and engine block have been developed such as, for example, an improved structural and thermal bond which is provided by machining special “dove-tail” shaped recessions in the inner surface of the engine block cylinder bore and then applying a cylinder liner material using a spray technique with, for example, a steel liner material. This type of interface provides an improved thermal bonding between the cylinder liner and the engine block.
A problem which has always been a challenge is the management of heat in the inter-bore section between adjacent cylinders in an engine block. There is only a very small mass of material in the engine block in the inter-bore section which is available to receive the heat being transferred into it from the combustion process occurring in the adjacent cylinders during operation of the engine. As the amount of heat in the engine block inter-bore section increases, the temperature of that material necessarily increases. This results in a potential degradation of material properties and characteristics of that engine block material. Indeed, at higher temperatures, an increase of only about 10 degrees Celsius may cause a reduction in properties of the engine block material by one half. For example, the engine block material may become soft and result in an undesirable amount of movement of the material away from the inter-bore section. This mechanism may be known as “recession” or “creep” in the industry. This movement or recession of the engine block material in the inter-bore section may result in a loss of seal between the engine block and a gasket seal and/or cylinder head. Indeed, the pressure of the cylinder head and gasket seal upon the deck surface of the engine block only tends to encourage movement of the engine block material away from the seal under the conditions where the increased temperature of the engine block material makes it increasingly susceptible to movement. This may result in an undesirable propagation of flame between adjacent cylinders and overall loss of efficiency in the combustion process.
Additionally, the movement or recession of engine block material may also induce stress into a cylinder liner and potentially alter the shape of a cylinder bore. The excellent structural bond between the as-cast cylinder liner and the engine block material means that when that engine block material recedes or moves, that moving material tends to induce a stress into the cylinder liner. In some instances, this heat related stress caused by the increased temperatures of the inter-bore engine block material may result in or encourage failure in the cylinder liner, such as by, for example, cracking of the cylinder liner and/or the engine block material.
The improved thermal conductivity provided by a cylinder liner with as-cast external features only exacerbates the above-described problems. The amount of heat being transferred into the engine block in the inter-bore section is increased because of the improved thermal transfer provided by the increased intimacy of the as-cast cylinder liner surface with the engine block material.
One attempt at addressing and managing the heat being transferred from the cylinders into the inter-bore section of the engine block is to provide a “saw-cut” in the deck surface across the inter-bore section such that a liquid coolant may flow through the area between cooling jackets arranged around the cylinders. However, providing the saw-cuts increases the cost, undesirably adds to the complexity of manufacture, increases the stress in the liner near the saw cut, and may lead to failure and/or cracking of the liner and the engine block material alongside the saw cut.
Another attempt to address these issues is to ensure that the cylinder liner may extend completely to the deck face, such that recession of the engine block material in the inter-bore section and loss of seal between the engine block and the cylinder head reduces the risk of combustion chamber seal and accompanying potential flame propagation between cylinders. This type of seal is typically achieved by pressing together of hard materials, including, for example, a multiple layer steel gasket. The hardness of these materials makes sealing somewhat difficult to achieve because the materials are not readily compliant such that they easily conform to each other under pressure. This pressure may yet further encourage recession of the block material away from the seal, which may be especially vulnerable because of the increased temperatures and resultant potential loss in material characteristics in the inter-bore areas.
Yet another attempt to address these problems has been to focus upon the composition of the alloy material that is used for the engine block. However, yet again, this may only increase the cost of the alloy, introduce complexity, and risk compromise of alloy characteristics that may be useful for other purposes.
In an exemplary aspect, a method of manufacturing a cylinder liner for an engine block for a vehicle propulsion system includes providing a cylinder liner mold having a cylindrical inner surface, masking a first portion of the cylindrical inner surface, applying a coating to a second portion of the cylindrical inner surface, and forming a cylinder liner by solidifying molten metal in the cylinder liner mold.
In this manner, a method for producing a cylinder liner reduces the post-casting steps, and improves the local heat transfer in non-inter-bore engine block regions, reduces residual stress from an engine block casting process incorporating the cylinder liner, reduces material costs by permitting a larger wall thickness, and improves structural bonding to the engine block.
In another exemplary aspect, the method further includes removing the masking from the first portion of the cylindrical inner surface prior to forming the cylinder liner.
In another exemplary aspect, the method further includes applying a second coating to the first portion of the cylindrical inner surface.
In another exemplary aspect, masking the first portion includes inserting a mask into the cylinder liner mold that masks the first portion of the cylindrical inner surface.
In another exemplary aspect, the method further includes inserting a spray tool having a spray nozzle into the cylinder liner mold prior to applying the coating.
In another exemplary aspect, the spray tool includes a mask that masks the first portion of the cylinder liner surface.
In another exemplary aspect, the cylinder liner mold further includes a spline formed in the second portion of the cylindrical inner surface.
In another exemplary aspect, a cylinder liner is produced by the method.
In another exemplary aspect, the cylinder liner includes a first engine block bonding surface formed adjacent to the first portion of the cylindrical inner surface and a second engine block bonding surface formed adjacent to the coating on the second portion of the cylindrical inner surface.
In another exemplary aspect, the second engine block bonding surface provides a lower heat transfer coefficient between the cylinder liner and an adjacent engine block material than the first engine block bonding surface.
In another exemplary aspect, the second engine block bonding surface extends a substantial portion of the axial length of the cylinder liner.
In another exemplary aspect, an outer diameter of the first engine block bonding surface is substantially equal to the outer diameter of the second engine block bonding surface.
In another exemplary aspect, an outer diameter of the first engine block bonding surface is less than the outer diameter of the second engine block bonding surface.
In another exemplary aspect, the cylinder liner includes a spline formed in the second engine block bonding surface.
In another exemplary aspect, the spline is a rectangular-shaped spline.
In another exemplary aspect, the spline is a triangular-shaped spline.
In another exemplary aspect, the spline is a dovetail-shaped spline.
Further areas of applicability of the present disclosure will become apparent from the detailed description provided below. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure.
The above features and advantages, and other features and advantages, of the present invention are readily apparent from the detailed description, including the claims, and exemplary embodiments when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
The present disclosure will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring now to the drawings, wherein the showings are for the purpose of illustrating certain exemplary embodiments only and not for the purpose of limiting the same,
The engine block 100 includes a cooling fluid jacket 106 which is exposed to (“open to”) the deck surface 110 and is, thus, known as an “open deck” block. The cooling fluid jacket 106 substantially surrounds the cylinder bores and provides fluid communication channels through which cooling fluid may be circulated to remove and manage heat which may be generated during a combustion process during operation of an engine incorporating the engine block 100.
The present inventors understand that there is a substantial difference in the coefficients of thermal expansion between the cast-iron liner material and the aluminum alloy material and further appreciate that the “as-cast” surface of the liner provides a strong mechanical bond between the liner and the engine block material. The aluminum alloy has a larger coefficient of thermal expansion than that of cast-iron. This means that the aluminum alloy will tend to shrink more than the cast-iron material as it cools. This has not generally caused problems in engine blocks which included cast in place cylinder liners which do not have an “as-cast” surface because the aluminum alloy is not as firmly bonded to the cylinder liner. In those situations, the aluminum alloy is free to “slide” down the surface of cylinder liner which reduces or substantially eliminates the residual stress that may otherwise be placed on the liner from the engine block material. In stark contrast, upon the introduction of cylinder liners having “as-cast” surfaces, which provide a much stronger structural bond between the cylinder liner and the engine block, this has resulted in the engine block material introducing stress in the cylinder liner. Unlike the non-as-cast surface liners, the potential for residual stress could not be alleviated by the engine block material sliding down the outside of the liner during the cooling process. Thus, cylinder liners having an “as-cast” surface experience residual stresses which are not present in liners that do not have an “as-cast” surface such as the press-in-place liners which have machined smooth or threaded external surfaces.
The second engine block bonding surface 308 extends a substantial portion of the axial length of the cylinder liner. It is to be understood that the second engine block bonding surface is not limited to any particular axial length. The extent of coverage of the second engine block bonding over the exterior surface of the cylinder liner only needs to be sufficient to reduce the thermal transfer coefficient from the cylinder bore into an inter-bore section of an engine block without limitation.
When the cylinder liner 304 is cast into an engine block, the second engine block bonding surface 308 may be oriented to be adjacent to an inter-bore section of the engine block such that the coefficient of thermal transfer between the cylinder liner 304 and the inter-bore section is less than the coefficient of thermal transfer between the cylinder liner 304 and other portions of the engine block. In this manner, the amount of heat transferred into the inter-bore section is reduced and the problems explained above, such as, for example, recession and cracking, are significantly reduced.
In the exemplary cylinder liner 304, the first engine block bonding surface 306 may extend around a substantial majority of the circumferential periphery of the cylinder liner 304. Further, in this exemplary cylinder liner 304, the first engine block bonding surface 306 is an as-cast rough surface while the second engine block bonding surface 308 may not have an as-cast rough surface.
With reference to
After solidification, the cylinder liner 608 has the structure illustrated in
The mold 800 further includes a second coating 804 that may have been applied using a spray arm having complementary mask elements to that of the spray arm 402 of
This description is merely illustrative in nature and is in no way intended to limit the disclosure, its application, or uses. The broad teachings of the disclosure can be implemented in a variety of forms. Therefore, while this disclosure includes particular examples, the true scope of the disclosure should not be so limited since other modifications will become apparent upon a study of the drawings, the specification, and the following claims.