The present invention relates to the field of formation testing and formation fluid sampling, and in particular to the determination, within the borehole, of various physical properties of the formation or the reservoir and of the fluids contained therein using a downhole instrument or “tool” comprising a snorkel interface.
A variety of systems are used in borehole geophysical exploration and production operations to determine chemical and physical parameters of materials in the borehole environs. The borehole environs include materials, such as fluids or formations, near a borehole as well as materials, such as fluids, within the borehole. The various systems include, but are not limited to, formation testers and borehole fluid analysis systems conveyed within the borehole. In all of these systems, it is preferred to make all measurements in real-time and within instrumentation in the borehole. However, methods that collect data and fluids for later retrieval and processing are not precluded.
Formation tester systems are used in the oil and gas industry primarily to measure pressure and other reservoir parameters of a formation penetrated by a borehole, and to collect and analyze fluids from the borehole environs to determine major constituents within the fluid. Formation testing systems are also used to determine a variety of properties of the formation or reservoir near the borehole. These formation or reservoir properties, combined with in situ or uphole analyses of physical and chemical properties of the formation fluid, can be used to predict and evaluate production prospects of reservoirs penetrated by the borehole. By definition, formation fluid refers to any and all fluid including any mixture of fluids.
Formation tester tools can be conveyed along the borehole by variety of means including, but not limited to, a single or multi-conductor wireline, a “slick” line, a drill string, a permanent completion string, or a string of coiled tubing. Formation tester tools may be designed for wireline usage or as part of a drill string. Tool response data and information as well as tool operational data can be transferred to and from the surface of the earth using wireline, coiled tubing and drill string telemetry systems. Alternately, tool response data and information can be stored in memory within the tool for subsequent retrieval at the surface of the earth.
Formation tester tools typically comprise a fluid flow line cooperating with a pump to draw fluid into the formation tester tool for analysis, sampling, and optionally for subsequent exhausting the fluid into the borehole. Typically, a sampling pad is pressed against the wall of the borehole. A probe port or “snorkel” is extended from the center of the pad and through any mudcake to make contact with formation material. The snorkel and pad are designed to isolate the pressure and fluid movement to and from the formation and the wellbore. The best sample to be analyzed and/or taken should be from an undisturbed formation without any wellbore contamination.
Fluid is drawn into the formation tester tool via a flow line cooperating with the snorkel. Fluid is sampled for subsequent retrieval at the surface of the earth, or alternately exhausted to the borehole via the flow lines and pump systems.
When performing formation tester probe operations in a wellbore, it is critical to maintain a proper seal against the formation while performing a drawdown/build-up sequence. As significant differential pressures (1,000's of psi) can be created during this operation, the sampling pad, typically made of an elastomeric material, may extrude between the surface of the wellbore and the interface of the snorkel. Generally, soft pliable rubber is wanted for the pad seal, however, this is more likely to extrude.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate an implementation of apparatus and methods consistent with the present invention and, together with the detailed description, serve to explain advantages and principles consistent with the invention. In the drawings,
In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, structure and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid obscuring the invention. References to numbers without subscripts or suffixes are understood to reference all instance of subscripts and suffixes corresponding to the referenced number. Moreover, the language used in this disclosure has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and may not have been selected to delineate or circumscribe the inventive subject matter, resort to the claims being necessary to determine such inventive subject matter. Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or to “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiments is included in at least one embodiment of the invention, and multiple references to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” should not be understood as necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
Wellbores are effectively circular. However, this is not required. The more advanced formation testers have pad and snorkel assemblies that will pivot and tilt so that the tester will provide a better seal to the formation. Conventional (prior art) snorkel designs have a flat surface, so that the edges of the snorkel rest on the curved surface of the wellbore. This leaves a gap between the snorkel and the wellbore that is at a maximum in a plane orthogonal to the initial contact between the snorkel and the wellbore. In various embodiments described below, the interface surface of the snorkel is formed with a cylindrical geometry to minimize the extrusion gap between the snorkel and the wellbore. The snorkel may be configured to prevent rotation of the snorkel, to ensure that the cylindrical geometry is correctly oriented with the wellbore surface.
As illustrated in
As is best illustrated in
The pad 116 is typically designed with a cylindrical surface made of an elastomeric material such as a rubber. In one embodiment, the pad 116 includes a structural support element 210 to reduce the rubber extrusion. The support element 210 may also have a cylindrical geometry similar to that of the snorkel 110.
The snorkel 110 is configured to make contact with the surface 102 in a desired rotational orientation. Conventional snorkels are allowed to rotate. If the snorkel 110 were to rotate so that the cylindrical geometry of the interface surface 112 was oriented orthogonal to the longitudinal axis of the borehole, instead of parallel to the longitudinal axis of the borehole, rather than minimizing the gap between the snorkel 110 and the borehole surface 102, the cylindrical geometry would increase the gap over that caused by the flat interface surface of a conventional snorkel. Therefore, in one embodiment, the body 118 of the snorkel may be keyed, allowing insertion of an anti-rotation pin 130 to prevent rotation of the snorkel body 118 relative to the piston cylinder 120 as the snorkel 110 extends or retracts, thus ensuring the desired orientation of the snorkel 110 relative to the borehole. The configuration and placement of the anti-rotation pin 130 of
In another embodiment, the snorkel 110 may be formed with an elliptical or other non-circular body 118 to prevent undesired rotation of the snorkel 110 relative to the piston cylinder 120, and thus to the borehole.
In contrast, prior art snorkel 300 when viewed along line A-A, as illustrated in
By using a cylindrical geometry at the interface surface 112 of a snorkel 110, a properly oriented snorkel 110 that is configured for the size of the borehole, extrusion of the sample pad between the borehole surface 102 and the snorkel interface surface 112 can be minimized or eliminated. Using an internal support element 210 that also has a cylindrical geometry may further reduce extrusion of the pad 116.
The formation tester borehole instrument or tool 910 comprises a plurality of operationally connected sections including a packer section 911, a probe or port section 912, an auxiliary measurement section 914, a fluid analysis section 916, a sample carrier section 918, a pump section 920, a hydraulics section 924, an electronics section 922, and a downhole telemetry section 925. Two fluid flow lines 950 and 952 are illustrated conceptually with broken lines and extend contiguously through the packer, probe or port tool, auxiliary measurement, fluid analysis, sample carrier, and pump sections 911, 912, 914, 916, 918 and 920, respectively. Although two fluid flow lines 950 and 952 are illustrated in
Fluid is drawn into the tester tool 910 through a snorkel 110 of a probe or port tool section 912. The probe or port section 912 can comprise one or more snorkels 110 as input ports. Fluid flow into the probe or port section 912 is illustrated conceptually with the arrows 936. During the borehole drilling operation, the borehole fluid and fluid within or near the borehole formation 100 may be contaminated with drilling fluid typically comprising solids, fluids, and other materials. Drilling fluid contamination of fluid drawn from the formation 100 is typically minimized using one or more probes cooperating with a borehole isolation element such as the pad 116 and the snorkel 110. One or more snorkels 110 extend from the pad onto the formation 100 as described above. The formation 100 may further be isolated from the borehole 928 by one or more packers controlled by the packer section 911. A plurality of packers can be configured axially as straddle packers.
Fluid passes from the probe or port section 912 through one or more flow lines 950 and 952 under the action of the pump section 920. The pump section 920 cooperating with other elements of the tool 910 allows fluid to be transported within the flow lines 950 and 952 upward or downward through various tool sections.
An auxiliary fluid measurement may be made using auxiliary measurement section 914. The auxiliary measurement section 914 typically comprises one or more sensors that measure various physical parameters of the fluid flowing within one or more of the flow lines 950 and 952.
The fluid analysis section 916 is typically used to perform fluid analyses on the fluid while the tool 910 is disposed within the borehole 928. As an example, fluid analyses can comprise the determination of physical and chemical properties of oil, water, and gas constituents of the fluid.
Fluid is directed via one or more of the flow lines 950 and 952 to the sample carrier section 918. Fluid samples can be retained within one or more sample containers within the sample carrier section 918 for return to the surface 942 of the earth for additional analysis. The surface 942 is typically the surface of earth formation 100 or the surface of any water covering the earth formation 100.
The hydraulic section 924 provides hydraulic power for operating numerous valves and other elements within the tool 910. The electronics section 922 comprises necessary tool control to operate elements of the tool 910, motor control to operate motor elements in the tool 910, power supplies for the various section electronic elements of the tool 910, power electronics, an optional telemetry for communication over a wireline to the surface, an optional memory for data storage downhole, and a tool processor for control, measurement, and communication to and from the motor control and other tool sections. The individual tool sections may also contain electronics (not shown) for section control and measurement.
The tool 910 may have a downhole telemetry section 925 for transmitting various data measured within the tool 910 and for receiving commands from surface 942 of the earth. The downhole telemetry section 925 can also receive commands transmitted from the surface 942 of the earth. The upper end of the tool 910 is terminated by a connector 927. The tool 910 is operationally connected to a conveyance apparatus 930 disposed at the surface 942 by means of a connecting structure 926 that is typically a tubular or a cable. More specifically, the lower or downhole end of the connecting structure 926 is operationally connected to the tool 910 through the connector 927. The upper or uphole end of the connecting structure 926 is operationally connected to the conveyance apparatus 930. The connecting structure 926 can function as a data conduit between the tool 910 and equipment disposed at the surface 942.
If the tool 910 is a logging tool element of a wireline formation tester system, the connecting structure 926 may comprise a multi-conductor wireline logging cable and the conveyance apparatus 930 may be a wireline draw works assembly comprising a winch. If the tool 910 is a component of a measurement-while-drilling or logging-while-drilling system, the connecting structure 926 may be a drill string and the conveyance apparatus 930 may be a rotary drilling rig. If the tool 910 is an element of a coiled tubing logging system, the connecting structure 926 may be coiled tubing and the conveyance apparatus 930 may be a coiled tubing injector. If the tool 910 is an element of a drill string tester system, the connecting structure 926 may be a drill string and the conveyance apparatus 930 may be a rotary drilling rig.
Surface equipment 932 is operationally connected to the tool 910 through the conveyance apparatus 930 and the connecting structure 926. The surface equipment 932 comprises a surface telemetry element (not shown), which communicates with the downhole telemetry section 925. The connecting structure 926 functions as a data conduit between the downhole and surface telemetry elements. The surface unit 932 typically comprises a surface processor that optionally performs additional processing of data measured by sensors and gauges in the tool 910. The surface processor also cooperates with a depth measure device (not shown) to track data measured by the tool 910 as a function of depth within the borehole 928 at which it is measured. The surface equipment 932 typically comprises recording means for recording logs of one or more parameters of interest as a function of time and/or depth.
It is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. For example, the above-described embodiments may be used in combination with each other. Many other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The scope of the invention therefore should be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. In the appended claims, the terms “including” and “in which” are used as the plain-English equivalents of the respective terms “comprising” and “wherein.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2674313 | Chambers | Apr 1954 | A |
2892501 | Boller | Jun 1959 | A |
2927459 | Farrington | Mar 1960 | A |
3062294 | Huitt et al. | Nov 1962 | A |
3173485 | Bretzke, Jr. | Mar 1965 | A |
3330367 | Redwine | Jul 1967 | A |
3344860 | Voetter | Oct 1967 | A |
3530933 | Whitten | Sep 1970 | A |
3565169 | Bell | Feb 1971 | A |
3732143 | Joosse | May 1973 | A |
3864970 | Bell | Feb 1975 | A |
4285398 | Zandmer et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4287946 | Brieger | Sep 1981 | A |
4533301 | Foster | Aug 1985 | A |
4951749 | Carroll | Aug 1990 | A |
5056595 | Desbrandes | Oct 1991 | A |
6026915 | Smith et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6157893 | Berger et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6729399 | Follini et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
7584655 | van Zuilekom et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7690423 | Del Campo et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7793713 | Nold et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7966875 | Proett et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8047286 | Zazovsky et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8113280 | Sherrill | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8220536 | Tao et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20010035289 | Runia | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030145652 | Arian | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040079527 | Meister et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050072565 | Segura et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050109538 | Fisseler et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20070007008 | Sherrill | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070151727 | Tao et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070181341 | Segura et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070284099 | DiFoggio et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080156487 | Zazovsky et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080295588 | van Zuilekom et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090283266 | Nold et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100155053 | Tao et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110011583 | Niconoff | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110162836 | Church | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110284212 | Tao et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120111632 | Sherrill et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1798368 | Jun 2007 | EP |
2384796 | Aug 2003 | GB |
03097999 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2007005071 | Jan 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Great Britain Search Report and Search Opinion for GB Application No. 1108850.7, dated Jun. 29, 2011, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120234088 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61454281 | Mar 2011 | US |