The present invention relates generally to flow cytometers. More particularly, the present invention relates to flow cytometers that sense optical properties of microscopic particles or components in a flow stream.
This invention is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/225,325, by Bernard Fritz et al., filed Aug. 21, 2002, and entitled “Optical Alignment Detection System”, which is incorporated herein by reference, and this invention is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/304,773, to Aravind Padmanabhan et al., filed Nov. 26, 2002, and entitled “Portable Scattering and Fluorescence Cytometer”, which is incorporated herein by reference. This invention also is related to U.S. Pat. No. 6,549,275 B1, by Cabuz et al., issued Apr. 15, 2003, and entitled “Optical Detection System for Flow Cytometry”; U.S. Pat. No. 6,597,438 B1, by Cabuz et al., issued Jul. 22, 2003, and entitled “Portable Flow Cytometer”; U.S. Pat. No. 6,382,228 B1, by Cabuz et al., issued May 7, 2002, and entitled “Fluid Driving System for Flow Cytometry”; U.S. Pat. No. 6,700,130 B2, issued Mar. 2, 2004, by Fritz, and entitled “Optical Detection System for Flow Cytometry”; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,240,944 B1, by Ohnstein et al., issued Jun. 5, 2001, and entitled “Addressable Valve Arrays for Proportional Pressure or Flow Control”; all of which are incorporated herein by reference. The term “fluid” may be used here as a generic term that includes gases and liquids as species. For instance, air, gas, water and oil are fluids.
The invention is a cytometer having a mechanism for aligning a fluid core stream in a channel.
Portions and components of cytometer 10 are not drawn to scale in
The controlled sample fluid 15 and supporting fluids 12 may be provided by fluidic circuits 16 and 47. A fluidic containment structure 39 may enclose hydrodynamic focusing that causes the desired particles 11 to fall into single file in a core stream 17 surrounded by a sheath fluid 12. One or more light sources 44 or light source arrangements 18 may provide light 13 through the core stream 17, and one or more light detectors 42, 43, or light detector arrangements 19 may detect the scatter 14 profiles and possible fluorescence of the particles 11 of a flow stream 30. Detector 43 may be an annular detector or an array of annular detectors. There may be a detector 42 positioned proximate to the center of the channel 31. An arrangement 38 may have one or more light sources 44 and/or one or more light detectors 42, 43. Arrangement 38 may include a single optical device or element arrangements 18 and 19 or an array of such items. A computer or processing block 20 may use output signals 46 via connection or line 45 from the light detector arrangement 19 to identify and/or count selected particles 11 in the core stream 17.
Flow sensors/pressure sensors (P-S) 24, 25, 34 may be provided in-line with each fluid prior to hydrodynamic focusing in region 32 of enclosure 39. Each flow sensor 24, 25, 34 may measure the velocity of the corresponding fluid. The flow sensors 24, 25, 34 may be thermal anemometer type flow sensors and/or microbridge type flow sensors. Pressure sensors 24, 25 and 34 may measure the pressures of the respective fluids 12 and 15.
The flow stream 30 may include a core stream 17 surrounded by a sheath fluid 12. Core stream 17 may be formed with hydrodynamic focusing with fluid 15 having particles 11 sheathed with a fluid 12, and may move along an axis 36 of channel 31. Particles 11 may be in suspension and in a focused flow of a single file. The fluid 15 with particles 11 may be injected from orifice 37 that may have a size between 50 and 200 microns. In
The velocity of the sheath fluid 12 may be different than that of the core stream 17 for a laminar flow. However, the velocity of the sheath fluid 12 and core stream 17 may remain sufficiently low to maintain laminar flow in the flow channel 31. Fluid 12 may enter through input port 56 into region 54 from reservoir 21 via pump/valve 26 and flow sensor/pressure sensor 24. Fluid 12 may enter through input port 57 into region 55 from reservoir 21 via pump/valve 27 and flow sensor/pressure sensor 25. The fluid 15 with particles 11 may have a low volume flow rate whereas the sheath fluid volume flow rate may be larger and set by the sheath fluid 12 pressures in regions 54 and 55 of containment 39. A barrier 49 may be a dividing wall between the channels or regions 54 and 55. A difference in pressure between fluid 15 and fluid 12 may be used to control the fluid 15 volume flow rate. The achievement of hydrodynamic focusing may depend on a laminar flow in which fluid 15 with its particles flows in central core stream that does not mix with the sheath fluid 12. Whether a flow is laminar may be determined from a Reynolds number (Re). Re=dρ
As particles 11 are hydrodynamically focused, they may be subject to shear stresses which may cause the particles to have their longer dimension (if any) oriented along the axis of their flow direction. Such shear forces may cause some particles to be somewhat elongated in the direction of flow.
In flow cytometer 10 using optical scattering, the particles 11 may be centered on the focused optical light beam 13 in order to achieve high signal-to-noise and accuracy in measurements. Adjustment of the location of the fluid core stream 17 containing the particles 11 such as cells may be accomplished by varying the flow parameters, (e.g., velocity, pressure and the like) of the surrounding sheathing fluid 12 in independent regions 54 and 55 during the injection process from nozzle or orifice 37 at the hydrodynamic focusing region 32. A control loop may be established between channel 31 having an optical light emitting and detection arrangement 38 (i.e., a light source 44 with a focused beam 13 and light detectors 42 and 43) and the control of the flow parameters (i.e., pressure and/or volume via pumps/valves 26 and 27 connected to computer/processor 20) in the sheathing fluid 12 portions in segments or regions 54 and 55 to move the core 17 with particles 11 to or from the center axis 36 where the focused light beam 13 is located so as to maximize or minimize (e.g., null) the optical light signals 13 and/or 14, which in turn may send corresponding electrical signals 46 to computer/processor 20 along an electrical conductor 45. Flow/pressure sensors 24 and 25 may monitor the differential flow and pressure of fluid 12 going into regions 54 and 55. These components may be connected to the computer/processor 20. As needed in maintaining control of the hydrodynamic focusing of core stream 17, the pump/valve 33 and flow/pressure sensor may be connected to computer/processor 20.
A flow cytometer measurement channel 31 may consist of a core region 17 of laminar flow containing the isolated particles 11 to be measured surrounded by a region of sheathing fluid 12. Both sheathing and particle 11 fluid regions may be injected into the measurement channel 31 by way of a hydrodynamic focusing mechanism. For a cytometer 10 which uses optical scattering as a measurement mechanism, it may be important to place the particles 11 substantially in the focused optical beam formed by the light source 18. This factor may be accomplished by adjusting the focused beam 13 to coincide with the particular location of the core 17 channel 31, and this may require the use of either multiple optical sources or a mechanical mechanism to translate or steer the optical beam 13. The same task may be accomplished by using a simple, fixed optical source 18/detector 19 module arrangement 38, adjusting the flow configuration to move the core stream 17, containing the fluid 15 with particles 11, sideways in channel 31 to the location of focused optical light beam 13. This may be done by dividing the sheathing fluid 12 into a number of independent channels, segments or regions 54 and 55, as shown in
There may be a miniaturized portable version 80 of cytometer 10 provided in a housing 81 sufficiently small to be appropriately and comfortably wearable on a person. As one illustrative example in
Although the invention has been described with respect to at least one illustrative embodiment, many variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the present specification. It is therefore the intention that the appended claims be interpreted as broadly as possible in view of the prior art to include all such variations and modifications.
The present application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/899,607, filed Jul. 27, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,242,474.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3661460 | Elking et al. | May 1972 | A |
| 3822095 | Hirschfeld | Jul 1974 | A |
| 3928094 | Angell | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3976862 | Curbelo | Aug 1976 | A |
| 4284412 | Hansen et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4352558 | Eisert | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4478076 | Bohrer | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4478077 | Boher | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4501144 | Higashi et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4599000 | Yamada | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4651564 | Johnson et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4683159 | Bohrer et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4695034 | Shimizu et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4704033 | Fay et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4745279 | Karkar et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4818263 | Mitch | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4874949 | Harris et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4911616 | Laumann, Jr. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4932989 | Presby | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4980292 | Elbert et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4983038 | Ohki et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5007732 | Ohki et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5017497 | Gerard de Grooth et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5050429 | Nishimoto et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5078581 | Blum et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5082242 | Bonne et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5085562 | van Lintel | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5096388 | Weinberg | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5108623 | Cangelosi et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5129794 | Beatty | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5171132 | Miyazaki et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5176358 | Bonne et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5185641 | Igushi et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5194909 | Tycko | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5219278 | van Lintel | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5224843 | van Lintel | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5244537 | Ohnstein | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5323999 | Bonne et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5441597 | Bonne et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5452878 | Gravesen et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5457526 | Kosaka | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5510267 | Marshall | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5528045 | Hoffman et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5530540 | Wyatt et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5570193 | Landa et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5601080 | Oppenheimer | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5616501 | Rodriguez | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5633724 | King et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5683159 | Johnson | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5716852 | Yager et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5717631 | Carley et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5726751 | Altendorf et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5728351 | Carver, Jr. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5757476 | Nakamoto et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5760900 | Ito et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5793485 | Gourley | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5799030 | Brenner | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5822170 | Cabuz et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5836750 | Cabuz | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5837547 | Schwartz | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5839807 | Perlo | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5863502 | Southgate et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5880474 | Norton et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5893722 | Hibbs-Brenner et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5901939 | Cabuz et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5922210 | Brody et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5932100 | Yager et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5948684 | Weigl et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5970315 | Carley et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5971158 | Yager et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5972710 | Weigl et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974867 | Forster et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6007775 | Yager | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6032689 | Tsai et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6054335 | Sun et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6082185 | Saaski | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6091197 | Sun et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6091537 | Sun et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6094293 | Yokoyama et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6097485 | Lievan | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6097859 | Solgaard et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6106245 | Cabuz | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6109889 | Zengerie et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6116756 | Peeters et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6124663 | Haake et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6139800 | Chandler | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6179586 | Herb et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6184607 | Cabuz et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6200820 | Hansen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6215221 | Cabuz et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6237619 | Maillefer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6240944 | Ohnstein et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6249341 | Basiji et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6281975 | Munk | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6382228 | Cabuz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6473171 | Buttry et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6473172 | Pelmulder | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6549275 | Cabuz et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6597438 | Cabuz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 20030057968 | Wang et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030142291 | Padmanabhan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20040043506 | Haussecker et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040065143 | Husher | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040109386 | Gold et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040154933 | Cosofret | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040233424 | Lee et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050074364 | Jindo | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050105077 | Padmanabhan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050123450 | Gilbert et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 10122321 | Apr 2002 | DE |
| 0269076 | Jun 1988 | EP |
| 0694784 | Jan 1996 | EP |
| 1001326 | May 1999 | EP |
| 1134548 | Sep 2001 | EP |
| 1359419 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 60082865 | May 1985 | JP |
| 61066947 | Apr 1986 | JP |
| 10073528 | Mar 1998 | JP |
| 2000056228 | Feb 2000 | JP |
| 2004257756 | Sep 2004 | JP |
| WO9527199 | Mar 1995 | WO |
| WO9960397 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO0109598 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| 0210713 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| 0210714 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| 2004059316 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| 2005090983 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| 2005108963 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| 2005114142 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| 2005114144 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080124805 A1 | May 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10899607 | Jul 2004 | US |
| Child | 11744685 | US |