Patent Application
20230383731
The following relates to a damage assessment arrangement for assessing the extent of damage to a lightning receptor electrically connected to a down conductor of a wind turbine rotor blade. The following also relates to a damage assessment method and a calibration method.
A wind turbine is generally equipped with a lightning protection system (LPS) that comprises a network of down conductors which serve to guide lightning current safely to ground in the event of a lightning strike. Generally, the current path to ground will comprise several down conductors at various regions of the wind turbine, as will be known to the skilled person. The rotor blades of a wind turbine are particularly susceptible to lightning strikes on account of their exposed position. Therefore, it is usual to equip a rotor blade with at least one lightning receptor and a down conductor to electrically connect the receptor to the remainder of the LPS. The rotor blade down conductors converge in the hub, and a bridge (for example a set of carbon brushes) provides a lightning path from the hub to ground, for example in to the nacelle, from the nacelle to the tower, and from the tower to ground. EP2884099A1 describes a way of assessing lightning damage to a wind turbine rotor blade by indirectly measuring the current through a lightning current path and deploying sensors to measure various parameters following a lightning strike. EP2551517A2 also suggests indirectly measuring current through a lightning current path and analyzing the measured signal to gain an understanding of the effects of lighting strikes to the wind turbine rotor blades.
A rotor blade down conductor may be assumed to extend from the inner root end of the rotor blade outwards towards the outer tip end. It shall be understood that a lightning receptor is mounted at the exterior of the rotor blade and is electrically connected to the down conductor. A down conductor and its receptors may collectively be referred to herein as a “rotor blade LPS”. A rotor blade LPS may comprise several receptors attached at intervals to the down conductor, for example a receptor close to the tip end, and a number of further receptors attached at intervals to the down conductor between tip and root. The mass of a receptor may be in direct proportion to its distance from the root, since a receptor further outward along the rotor blade is more likely to attract a lightning strike.
A receptor is usually a compact block made of one or more metals or metal alloys, and designed to safely attract a lightning strike and to form a robust connection to the down conductor, while at the same time having minimal effect on the rotor blade's aerodynamic performance. A receptor mounted on a wind turbine rotor blade may receive multiple lightning strikes each year, for example several hundred, depending on the geographical location of the wind turbine. Each lightning strike to a receptor results in rapid heating and expansion of the receptor, and some vaporization of the metal. The receptor is also subject to environmental influences such as extreme heat, extreme cold, impact from hailstones, etc. Ultimately, any such receptor will exhibit damage of some kind. The reliability of the receptor may initially be unaffected by minor damage, but subsequent accumulated strikes ultimately have a detrimental effect on the functionality of the receptor. Severe failure may result when the mass of a receptor has been reduced by vaporization to such an extent that it can no longer provide a safe current path to the down conductor. A lightning strike to such a compromised receptor may result in severe damage to the body of the rotor blade.
For this reason, it is important to regularly inspect the receptors and to repair or replace any damaged receptors in order to avoid catastrophic failure. Since the receptors are located on the exterior of the rotor blades, their physical state can generally only be assessed by visual inspection by a technician in a safety harness. However, it is hazardous, expensive and time-consuming to carry out such a visual inspection of the rotor blade receptors, so that this aspect of wind turbine maintenance presents a significant cost factor. Alternatively, a drone equipped with cameras may be deployed to obtain images of the rotor blade LPS receptors, but it is difficult to assess the extent of receptor damage from such images.
An aspect relates to provide a more economical way of assessing the health of a lightning receptor of a wind turbine rotor blade.
In the context of embodiments of the invention, a wind turbine comprises a number of rotor blades, usually three, mounted to a hub. The rotor blades and hub are collectively referred to as the aerodynamic rotor. As explained above, each rotor blade of a wind turbine may be assumed to be equipped with at least one LPS down conductor extending from the root end of the rotor blade towards the tip end, and with one or more lightning receptors mounted to face outward from the rotor blade near the tip end and electrically connected to the down conductor.
According to embodiments of the invention, the damage assessment arrangement comprises a measurement pulse module that has a pulse generator arranged to transmit a pulse into the down conductor (at its inner end), and a return signal detector arranged to detect the signal returned after reflection of the pulse by the various elements of the rotor blade LPS. A single transmitted pulse may result in a complex return signal, depending on the realization of the LPS down conductor and its receptor(s), so that time-delay, distortion and attenuation are recorded for each reflected return signal following a transmitted pulse. The damage assessment arrangement further comprises a return signal analysis module that is configured to determine the extent of alteration of the reflected return signal relative to an expected return signal, and a damage estimation module that is configured to relate the relative extent of alteration to a measure of damage to rotor blade LPS.
In the context of embodiments of the invention, the “expected return signal” of a healthy rotor blade may be determined early on in the rotor blade lifetime, for example prior to or shortly after installation of the rotor blade. The physical characteristics (geometry, receptor position, receptor mass etc.) of the rotor blade LPS will govern the time-domain and frequency-domain properties of the expected return signal. For example, when several receptors are arranged at intervals along the down conductor, each of these will contribute to the return signal, and the time-domain position of each such contribution is characteristic for the actual position of the receptor. With this information, the return signal can be analyzed to determine the health of each of several receptors of the rotor blade LPS. Any alteration to the physical characteristics of a receptor will affect the return signal in some way. Equally, the physical state of the down conductor will affect the return signal, so that damage to the down conductor can also be determined by analysis of the return signal.
An advantage of the inventive damage assessment arrangement is that it makes use of the down conductor that is already installed in a rotor blade to provide a mode of performing LPS receptor health diagnostics. The inventive damage assessment arrangement can therefore be realized with little effort. The pulse generator and return signal detector can be purchased as a simple off-the-shelf unit or set of units, and connection of the measurement pulse module to the down conductor is relatively straightforward.
The analysis module and damage estimation module can be completely or partially realized as software modules running on a processor of a control unit such as a wind turbine controller, for example a local wind turbine controller already installed in the wind turbine, or a remote wind park controller, and may therefore be associated with favorably low costs. The software already installed on an existing system can be updated, with relatively little effort, to install and run the relevant method steps of the present application.
According to embodiments of the invention, the method of assessing the extent of receptor damage comprises the steps of providing such a damage assessment arrangement; operating the pulse generator of the measurement pulse module to transmit a pulse into one end of a lightning down conductor of a rotor blade of the wind turbine; operating the return signal detector to detect the reflected signal; analyzing the reflected return signal to determine the extent of alteration relative to an expected return signal; and relating the relative extent of alteration to a measure of damage to the rotor blade LPS.
An advantage of the inventive method is that a damage estimate can be obtained with relatively little effort, since the method only requires transmitting a pulse into the down conductor that is already installed in the rotor blade and evaluating the reflected signal. Embodiments of the invention are based on the insight that any alteration to the structure of the receptor will cause a known or expected signal shape to be distorted, and the degree of distortion (relative to an expected signal shape) will be related to the degree of alteration—i.e. the degree of damage—to the of the receptor(s) of the down conductor. Embodiments of the invention make it possible to carry out accurate LPS receptor damage assessment by analyzing one or more reflected signals, and this can be done in a straightforward manner with little computational effort.
By regularly assessing receptor health at suitable intervals, it is possible to distinguish between healthy and damaged receptors, so that unnecessary inspection routines can be avoided, and receptor maintenance procedures can be scheduled only when these become necessary.
In the following, it may be assumed that a lightning down conductor extends from the root region of a rotor blade towards the tip of the rotor blade. The “inner end” of the down conductor shall be understood to be the end that terminates in or near the root region of the blade. The “outer end” of the down conductor shall be understood to be the end that terminates in or near the tip of the blade. The down conductor may extend along the length of the rotor blade in a direction that follows the longitudinal axis of the rotor blade. The down conductor may be assumed to be rigidly mounted in the interior of the rotor blade and may for example be secured at several points along its length to the interior surface of the rotor blade. The down conductor can be suspended in the interior cavity of the rotor blade, or it may lie against the interior surface of the rotor blade. Equally, a down conductor may be partially or completely embedded in a wall of the rotor blade. Regardless of how the down conductor is actually realized, a main aspect of embodiments of the invention is that any deterioration of the structure of a receptor attached to the down conductor will distort a pulse transmitted from the inner end of the down conductor, and the extent or nature of the distortion will be related to the extent or nature of the deterioration of the receptor.
The inventive wind turbine also comprises an embodiment of the inventive damage assessment arrangement. The damage assessment arrangement is realized to transmit a pulse into the end of the lightning down conductors of all rotor blades and to detect each reflected signal. This can be done by providing three measurement pulse modules and connecting each to a down conductor, or by connecting a single measurement pulse module to the three down conductors. The advantage of using three measurement pulse modules is that each can operate independently of the other, so that the health of the receptors can be assessed simultaneously for all rotor blades.
However, the use of a single measurement pulse module is more economical. Therefore, in an embodiment of the invention, the measurement pulse module comprises a single pulse generator and a single return signal detector. In this embodiment, an identical pulse is transmitted to each rotor blade in turn. Pulse transmission and the detection of the reflected signal can be accomplished within a very brief time.
A measurement pulse module is arranged in the wind turbine hub or at a suitable location near the root regions of the rotor blades. A measurement pulse module is connected to a rotor blade down conductor using a low impedance cable, for example a 50Ω coaxial cable, and a suitable connector. Appropriate measures may be taken to protect the measurement pulse module from lightning current, as will be known to the skilled person.
The rotor blade LPS health can be assessed on the basis of the time delay and/or the degree of distortion and/or the degree of attenuation of the reflected return signal.
The down conductor of a rotor blade may be regarded as an antenna. A pulse transmitted into an ideal straight antenna will be returned (reflected) with some time delay but without any significant attenuation or distortion. However, for various reasons, a rotor blade down conductor does not behave as an ideal antenna, so that the pulse reflected by a pristine arrangement of down conductor and receptor(s) will exhibit a time delay as well as some amount of attenuation and distortion. These parameters will also be affected by the curvature of the down conductor, which in turn may be influenced by the angular position of the rotor blade and by any deflection in the outboard region caused by wind loading. Therefore, calibration and damage assessment are carried out under similar conditions, for example with the rotor blade at the “six o'clock” position, when wind speed is less than a certain threshold (the rotor blade is not bent by wind loads), etc.
In the following, therefore, the signal that is reflected by a down conductor under such conditions is referred to as the “expected” or “healthy” return signal, since it represents the expected behavior of a healthy rotor blade LPS.
For example, if the reflected return signal has a similar shape to the expected return signal, and if the reflected return signal has been attenuated only slightly, this can be interpreted to mean that the structure of the rotor blade LPS is in good health, i.e., its elements have not sustained any significant damage and the electrical connection between each receptor and down conductor is sound. It would not be necessary to include the receptor(s) of that rotor blade in a planned maintenance routine. In another example, if the reflected return signal is significantly distorted and/or attenuated compared to the expected return signal, this can be interpreted to mean that a receptor and/or its electrical connection may have sustained severe damage. In this case, it would be appropriate to schedule an inspection and maintenance routine for that rotor blade.
According to embodiments of the invention, the shape of the expected return signal is determined in a previous calibration step. To this end, the damage assessment arrangement is calibrated as follows. For a receptor position of a specific rotor blade down conductor, a pristine (new and undamaged) receptor is obtained, as well as several receptors exhibiting varying measures of damage. The measure of damage of each receptor is quantified or classified using some suitable mode, for example a scale from 1 (pristine, new, undamaged) to 10 (severe fault). The selected set of receptors is connected at the various positions along the down conductor. The measurement pulse module is operated in order to obtain a reflected return signal. This measurement step is initially carried out with only pristine receptors mounted to the down conductor, in order to obtain an exemplary “expected return signal” for that rotor blade LPS. The time-domain and frequency-domain signal characteristics of the expected return signal are then stored as a reference for that rotor blade LPS.
The measurement step is then carried out with various combinations of the damaged receptors mounted to the down conductor, in order to obtain the corresponding return signals. For example, for a rotor blade LPS with three receptors, and ten versions of each receptor as explained above, the measurement step can be carried out ten times in order to obtain the expected return signal (all receptors have damage class 1) and nine return signals, each of which is obtained for receptors with a specific damage class. The measurement step can be carried out any number of times to cover all possible combinations.
The distortion of a reflected return signal relative to the expected return signal is quantified in some suitable manner, for example by a set of values for time delay, attenuation, distortion, number of peaks/troughs in the return signal, etc. The outcome of the calibration procedure can be a catalogue or table listing receptor health classes against corresponding signal parameter sets. In this way, a “library” can be compiled to relate return signal shapes to damage levels. Of course, as will be known to the skilled person, machine learning could be deployed to learn how to identify damage to receptors from a training set of return signals.
A favorable accuracy is obtained by providing a set of receptors that exhibit a broad range of damage, i.e. from undamaged (corresponding to factory-new) to severely damaged (corresponding to a receptor at the end of its lifetime after sustaining multiple lightning strikes), with many intermediate levels of damage.
The calibration method comprises a step of compiling a look-up-table that relates the measure of damage of each receptor to the corresponding reflected signal parameters. A look-up-table is compiled for a specific rotor blade LPS assembly, i.e. a down conductor and one or more receptors.
The calibration procedure may be repeated for various temperature ranges, since electrical conductivity is temperature dependent. A LUT can be prepared for each temperature range, e.g., a LUT for the −10° C. to 0° C. range, another LUT for the 0° C. to 10° C. range, another LUT for the 10° C. to 20° C. range, etc. When assessing receptor damage, an ambient temperature reading is obtained, and the appropriate LUT is consulted.
Machine learning can be used to analyze the expected return signal under various operating conditions and in respect of various parameters. In a return signal obtained using imperfect receptors, any deviation from the expected values can be processed using machine learning to deduce the associated extent of damage. During the lifetime of the rotor blade, machine learning can be applied to the rotor blade LPS return signals to determine the extent of damage.
Some of the embodiments will be described in detail, with reference to the following figures, wherein like designations denote like members, wherein:
This is illustrated in
A first reflected signal R1 has undergone only minor distortion relative to the expected return signal RE, so that the rotor blade LPS may be deemed to be healthy. The receptors 20R are each assigned an appropriate damage assessment level, for example: Dgood meaning “receptor is healthy”. A second reflected signal R2 has undergone minor distortion relative to the expected return signal RE, indicating that the receptors are functional but have sustained minor damage. Each receptor 20R is assigned an appropriate damage assessment level, for example: Dmild meaning “receptor exhibits slight wear”. A third reflected signal R3 has undergone severe distortion relative to the expected return signal RE, indicating that at least one receptor may no longer be reliable. Analysis of the reflected signal R3 indicates that the receptor 20R at the third position S3 is no longer reliable, while the receptors at the other positions have sustained significant levels of wear. The receptors are assigned appropriate damage assessment levels, for example: Dfail meaning “receptor fail” for the receptor at position S3; and Dpoor for the remaining receptors. This exemplary diagram indicates a time-domain representation of the return signals, but it shall be understood that the damage levels can be deduced from a time-domain and frequency-domain analysis of the return signal. Of course, these damage assessment levels are proposed only by way of example, and any number of damage assessment levels may be used to cover a broader range of “health states” for the rotor blade LPS receptors.
By collecting information in a calibration phase, using many instances of that receptor and down conductor arrangement, a look-up table (LUT) can be compiled to relate parameters of such return signals to receptor damage. The damage assessment levels described in the above example may be chosen by identifying a “best match” between the parameters of a reflected signal and the parameters of a LUT entry, as will be known to the skilled person.
In this exemplary embodiment, the pulse generator 10 applies an electrical pulse P to the inner end 20Croot of the lightning conductor 20C. The pulse P—for example a Gaussian pulse P—travels along the lightning conductor 20C in the direction of the tip. The pulse P will travel to the outer end of the down conductor 20C, where it is reflected. Any receptor 20R (e.g., at positions S1-S4 of
A receptor damage assessment unit 12 is configured to estimate the receptor health on the basis of the observed reflection parameters 110 recorded by the return signal detector 11. In a straightforward embodiment as indicated here, the observed reflection parameters 110 can be matched to the closest corresponding entry in a look-up table 120 as described above. For example, a set of return signal parameters 110 reported by the return signal detector 11 can be matched to a set of return signal parameters in the database 120, and the corresponding damage assessment level 12R can be identified and reported to an operator or controller, for example to a remote wind park operator 4. The operator can then decide whether a service schedule is necessary (e.g., the damage assessment level 12R is classified as “poor” or “fail”) or whether a service schedule is not necessary (e.g., the damage assessment level is classified as “good” or only “mild”).
Although the present invention has been disclosed in the form of preferred embodiments and variations thereon, it will be understood that numerous additional modifications and variations could be made thereto without departing from the scope of the invention.
For the sake of clarity, it is to be understood that the use of ‘a’ or ‘an’ throughout this application does not exclude a plurality, and ‘comprising’ does not exclude other steps or elements.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20203019.3 | Oct 2020 | EP | regional |
This application claims priority to PCT Application No. PCT/EP2021/075913, having a filing date of Sep. 21, 2021, which claims priority to EP Application No. 20203019.3, having a filing date of Oct. 21, 2020, the entire contents both of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2021/075913 | 9/21/2021 | WO |
