Damage-resistant deflector vane

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6409108
  • Patent Number
    6,409,108
  • Date Filed
    Friday, December 22, 2000
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 25, 2002
    23 years ago
Abstract
A deflectable vane member for a coal mill pulverizer throat. The vane is yieldingly mounted in the throat with a spring support member whose force is designed to hold the vane rigidly in place during normal operations, and to yield when the vane is struck by large debris with sufficient force. The spring support member causes the vane to spring back into its operative position after it has yielded to the debris.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is in the field of deflector vanes used in the “throat” portions of coal mill pulverizers.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Coal mill pulverizers, especially those of the bowl mill roller type, are typically provided with a pulverizer “throat” comprising an annular air passage surrounding the pulverizer and directing an upward flow of air around the pulverizer to entrain freshly-pulverized coal particles upwardly to a classifier device. The pulverizer throat is typically provided with a plurality of angled deflector vanes which impart a spiral direction to the air flow to better assist the classifying function. Pulverizer throats come in both stationary and rotating types.




The deflector vanes themselves are often fixed in place, although adjustable vanes have been developed which allow the air passages between the vanes to be adjusted as to flow area and angular orientation.




The coal originally fed into the pulverizer is often pre-classified using known sortation machinery to eliminate debris such as rock and scrap or “tramp” iron. Occasionally, however, heavy debris such as tramp iron is fed into the pulverizer and collides with the deflector vanes in the throat. If the debris is big enough, the vanes can be damaged and even broken off.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is a spring-loaded, deflectable deflector vane which, under suitably forceful impact by large pieces of debris, momentarily deflects to absorb the shock and then springs back into position.




In a first embodiment a vane is pivotally mounted in the pulverizer throat on an axis permitting it to rotate downwardly and outwardly. A torsion spring has one end secured to the lower side of the deflector vane, and the other end secured to a fixed location such as the inner ring or “race” of the pulverizer throat. When a large piece of debris strikes the upper surface of the vane, the vane is momentarily forced downwardly and outwardly against the force of the spring, letting the impacting piece pass to the lower mill reject (pyrite) area, and thereby producing a resistive force which returns the vane to its normal position after the collision.




In a second embodiment the vane is supported in the pulverizer throat on the axis of a horizontal tubular coil spring which has an outer end connected to the vane and an inner end secured to the pulverizer throat or other fixed structure in close association with the vane. The spring is sufficiently rigid to function as a vane support during normal vane operation. Debris striking the vane causes it to deflect downwardly and outwardly as the axis of the normally rigid tubular vane support is bent.




Although torsion and coil springs are preferred, other types of spring such as leaf springs and spring equivalents could be used in the invention to provide a normally rigid vane support capable of yielding to sharp blows and then forcing the vane back to its usual position.




The vane is preferably mounted to a radially inner portion of the throat to deflect downwardly and outwardly. Whether the deflection can be described as more downward or more outward will depend on the shape and angular orientation of the vane in its rest position. It will be understood that “outward” is to be understood relative to the portion of the throat on which the vane is mounted.




These and other features and advantages of the invention will become apparent on a further reading of the specification, in light of the accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a partially cut-away, perspective view of a typical pulverizer throat vane arrangement according to the prior art.





FIG. 2

illustrates one of the

FIG. 1

vanes being broken off by impact with a large piece of debris cascading over the bowl of the pulverizer.





FIG. 3

is a rear, perspective view of a deflectable vane according to the present invention, using a pivoting torsion spring support.





FIG. 3A

illustrates the vane of

FIG. 3

deflecting under impact from debris.





FIG. 4

is a rear perspective view of an alternate embodiment of the invention, using a tubular coil spring as the spring support.





FIG. 4A

illustrates the vane of

FIG. 3

deflecting under impact from debris.





FIG. 4B

is a plan view, partially sectioned, of a vane and mount from FIG.


4


A.





FIG. 5

is a plan view of another alternate spring support for the vane of the present invention, illustrating the use of a leaf spring.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATED EMBODIMENT




Referring to

FIG. 1

, a typical bowl mill type pulverizer


10


comprises grinding wheels


12


,


14


, and


16


, operating to crush coal in a bowl


18


. Surrounding the bowl


18


and rotatable therewith is a rotating vane assembly


20


which includes an essentially circular arrangement of uniformly spaced, angled steel vanes


22


through which air is caused to flow upwardly around the periphery of the grinding bowl


18


for the purpose of carrying coal fines to a classification area above the pulverizer. Vanes


22


are welded to a steel inner ring or race


24


which is mounted for rotation around bowl


18


. Larger particles of ground coal and occasional pieces of debris may pass downwardly through the vanes


22


into the lower section of the bowl mill


10


, to be handled in known manner.




While

FIG. 1

illustrates a rotating vane assembly


20


, it is also known to provide vanes such as


22


in fixed, non-rotating vane assemblies in a manner well known to those skilled in the art. The overall construction and operation of bowl mill type pulverizers with both rotating and stationary throats is well known.




It is a common practice to refer to the annular space bounded by the inner and outer races


24


,


24




a


of the vane assembly


20


as the pulverizer “throat”, and this term will be used hereafter to generally denote the region through which air passes an array of vanes to entrain coal fines spilling over from the pulverizer bowl. It should be understood that although annular, ring-like throats are typical, other shapes may occur.




Vanes


22


are fixed in place by welds


22




a


on inner race


24


; they may also include adjustable airflow control devices on lower surfaces which can be adjusted relative to the lower surface of their respective vanes to extend in greater or lesser degrees into the upward flow of air between the vanes. The construction of such airflow control devices are known to those skilled in the art and the operation of one type is described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,090,631, for example.




Referring next to

FIG. 2

, it is not uncommon for large pieces of debris to be delivered into the pulverizer, where they fall or are thrown against the upper surfaces


22




b


of vanes


22


in the pulverizer throat. In

FIG. 2

a large piece of debris labeled


40


is illustrated as impacting and breaking one of the welded steel vanes


22


off the inner race


24


. This type of damage is difficult to repair, since an entire vane assembly falling off can cause damage to the lower pyrite area and results in pulverizer downtime while the vane is being replaced or repaired. Damage or destruction of a vane also affects the efficiency of the classifying function near the upper end of the classifier, as will be understood by those skilled in the art.




Referring now to

FIG. 3

, the plurality of vanes


22


are shown modified according to the present invention. While the vanes


22


themselves are standard, having upper surfaces


22




b,


lower surfaces


22




c,


and coming in various shapes and sizes, the manner in which vanes


22


are mounted in the pulverizer throat allows them to deflect to allow heavy debris to pass without becoming damaged or broken off.




The underside of each vane


22


is provided with a spring return mount


49


which in the illustrated embodiment is secured to inner race


24


. Each spring return mount includes pivot bushing or mount


50


secured to inner race


24


with a weld


50




a.


The illustrated pivot mounts


50


comprise hollow tubes rotatably supporting steel pivot pins


52


which have upper ends extending from pivot mount


50


and secured to the underside of the associated plate


54


, for example as shown at weld


52




a.


More specifically in the illustrated embodiment, each pivot pin


52


is welded at its upper or external end to a spacer plate


54


fastened to the underside


22




c


of the vane. Spacer plate


54


functions as an adapter to allow the flat-bottomed vane


22


in the illustrated example to be conveniently welded to the pivot pin, in particular where the invention is applied as an add-on modification to an existing vane wheel and vane arrangement using standard vanes. It should be noted in

FIG. 3

that plate


54


has a cut-out portion


54




a


at its lower end to make room for the larger-diameter pivot bushing


50


.




Spacer plate


54


can further function as a removable mounting platform for a standard vane such as that shown at


22


. This allows for the easy replacement of vane


22


should the vane itself become damaged despite the assistance of the invention, or should the vanes become worn in the ordinary course of use. The removable mounting platform of plate


54


allows the quick switch-out of different types of vanes on the same spring return mount, which is more permanently secured to inner race


24


. In the illustrated embodiment, vane


22


is attached to mounting plate


54


with simple bolt and nut structure


54




b,




54




c.






It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that while the foregoing specific methods of attaching various portions of the spring return mount


49


to the inner race


24


and to vane


22


are preferred, it will be understood that other securing methods and techniques can be used which are known to those skilled in the art. For example, rather than welds


50




a


and


52




a,


various mechanical fasteners could be used.




It will generally be preferred to mount vane


22


on spring return mount


49


with the vane's inside edge


22




d


immediately adjacent or abutting the wall of race


24


. This serves to protect spring return mechanism


49


not only from larger pieces of debris, but also from the abrasive effect of oversized coal fines flowing over the lip of the pulverizer into the throat.




Spring return mount


49


includes a spring


60


, in the illustrated embodiment a coil spring having a vane end


60




a


and a race end


60




b


respectively held against or secured to vane


22


and race


24


. Spring


60


is preferably at least axially secured on pivot pin


52


, for example with a weld, stop, or internal collar on pin


52


which prevents spring


60


from sliding off the upper end of the pin.




Referring next to

FIG. 3A

, when a large piece of debris such as


40


strikes the upper surface of one of the vanes


22


provided with spring return mount


49


, the vane with its attached pivot pin


52


rotates downwardly and outwardly along the axis of bushing


50


, yielding to the impact force and safely allowing debris to pass to the pyrite section of the mill for normal ejection and thereby preserving the vane. Since the vane is mounted in a pivoting manner to race


24


, no damage is suffered by the vane mount. Instead, as vane


22


rotates downwardly and outwardly (relative to the inner race


24


) on the pivot axis defined by mount


49


, upper end


60




a


of the spring is forced inwardly against the spring winding force while lower end


60




b


remains fast against race


24


. This means that the force of the blow from debris


40


is progressively absorbed by and stored in spring


60


, until the debris has bounced off, at which point spring


60


forces upper leg


60




a


and therefore vane


22


back up into the normal vane operating position shown in FIG.


3


.




It can be seen from the foregoing that vanes provided with the spring return mechanism according to the invention are virtually impervious to heavy blows, greatly extending their useful life in the pulverizer throat. It can also be seen that the angled pivot axis defined by mount


49


, aligned along the inner edge of the vane and parallel to the race, provides a unique downward and outward deflecting movement believed to have been unknown in the pulverizer throat art until now.




Referring next to

FIGS. 4

,


4


A, and


4


B, an alternate spring return mechanism


149


is illustrated comprising horizontally arranged tubular spring elements


160


comprising stiff, tightly coiled springs with enough rigidity to provide horizontal supports for the underside of vanes


22


under normal operating conditions, but to yield in a manner similar to the spring return mechanism


49


in

FIG. 3

when the vanes are struck by debris, as best shown in FIG.


4


A. These alternate spring return mechanisms


149


further include an angled spacer plate


154


welded or removably fastened to the underside of vanes


22


to provide a mounting platform for the ends of horizontally arrayed tubular springs


160


. In the illustrated embodiment of

FIG. 4

, springs


160


are secured to the perpendicular portion


154




b


of plate


154


with bushings


160




a


secured to the ends of the springs and in turn fastened to plate portion


154




b


with through-bolts


154




a


extending through the plate and bushings and at least partway into the springs, secured therein in a suitable fashion, for example with a nut. Other methods of securing the spring ends to the vane are of course possible and within the abilities of those of ordinary skill in the art.




Comparison of the spring return mounts


49


,


149


in

FIGS. 3 and 4

shows that mount


149


is better suited for vanes with an overhanging, differently-angled upper leg due to the different range of motion through which the horizontal springs allow the vane to yield. The fixed pivot axis of mounts


49


in

FIG. 3

immediately adjacent and tangential to race


24


requires vanes shaped such that no protruding portion or edge geometry will interfere with the desired range of pivot motion by colliding with race


24


. The flat, rectangular vanes illustrated in

FIG. 3

are one possible and preferred shape.




In

FIG. 4

, like in

FIG. 3

, the spring return mechanism is shown secured to inner race


24


of the pulverizer throat. It will again be emphasized that the invention can be practiced by securing portions of the spring return mechanism to the inner race, the outer race, or any other portion of the pulverizer in a location suitable to provide a convenient mount for a vane in the throat. In the illustrated embodiment, the race-side ends of springs


160


are secured to annular bushings


160




a,


for example by welding the end of the spring to the bushing. Bushing


160




a


can in turn be welded to the inner race


24


, or if possessing an aperture therethrough coaxial with the spring, can be secured to the inner race mechanically, for example with a bolt extending through the race wall into the aperture in the bushing. A preferred arrangement for securing the springs to plate


154


and inner race


24


is shown in FIG.


4


B.




Referring next to

FIG. 5

, a vane


22


is illustrated as being pivotally mounted on race


24


in a manner similar to that shown in

FIG. 3

, but with a leaf spring element


260


secured at each end


260




a,




260




b


to vane


22


and race


24


, respectively. In the embodiment of

FIG. 5

, the spring element


260


is mounted separately from the pivot attachment


250


of vane


22


to the race


24


. Illustrated pivot mount


250


can be a hinge-type of a kind commonly available, for example bolted to vane


22


and race


24


.




It will accordingly be understood by those skilled in the art that while we have disclosed several embodiments of the invention, there will be many different ways to carry out the invention according to its principles without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims. For example, the exact type of spring element used is subject to variation, depending on the nature of the pivoting or other folding or yieldable mounting arrangement which allows vane


22


to yield from race


24


. The invention can be applied to vanes secured to either the inner or outer race portions of the throat, or perhaps other suitable regions in the throat. The type and shape of vanes


22


which the invention is capable of yieldingly supporting is also subject to variation according to many known types of vanes in the art. Techniques for connecting the various components of a yieldable spring mount for a vane will also be subject to variation according to the skill of those experienced in the art.



Claims
  • 1. In a coal mill pulverizer throat, a damage-resistant vane assembly comprising:a deflectable vane mounted in the throat on a spring support, the spring support being designed to support the vane in a normal position in the throat during normal operating conditions, and to allow the vane to temporarily yield to a deflected position when the vane is struck by heavy debris, and to return the vane to the normal position when the debris has passed.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the vane is mounted adjacent an inner race of the pulverizer throat to move from the normal position to the deflected position, and the spring support comprises a spring member between a lower side of the vane and the inner race, the spring member acting against the lower side of the vane to maintain the vane in the normal position during normal operating conditions and to yield the vane to the deflected position when the vane is struck with heavy debris.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the vane is pivotally mounted on the inner race and the spring member is a torsion spring.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the vane is pivotally mounted on the inner race and the spring member is a leaf spring.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the spring member is at least one tubular spring secured at an inner end to the inner race so as to extend horizontally from the race into the throat, the vane being supported on an outer portion of the tubular spring with an inner edge of the vane adjacent the inner race in the normal position.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the spring member comprises a pair of tubular springs, the vane being supported on an outer portion of the pair of tubular springs.
US Referenced Citations (12)
Number Name Date Kind
3040888 Hosokawa et al. Jun 1962 A
4504018 Diggins Mar 1985 A
4598872 Henne et al. Jul 1986 A
4638953 Taylor Jan 1987 A
4750677 Taylor Jun 1988 A
4907751 Wark et al. Mar 1990 A
5090631 Wark Feb 1992 A
5186404 Wark Feb 1993 A
5251831 Yoshida et al. Oct 1993 A
5381968 Lohnherr et al. Jan 1995 A
5533629 Ito et al. Jul 1996 A
5957300 Nardi et al. Sep 1999 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
264 156 Sep 1987 DE