This invention relates to damped hinge assemblies, and more particularly, to damper assemblies for use with toggle type hinges of the sort that are typically used on kitchen cupboards.
The invention provides a damper assembly for a hinge, comprising a linear damping device, retaining means for mounting the damping device on a hinge, and a mechanism for converting rotational movement of the hinge in at least part of one direction into linear actuation of the damping device, wherein the movement converting mechanism comprises two separate camming devices which are both capable of transmitting force.
By way of example, embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The form of damper assembly seen in exploded view in
As seen in
The damper unit 10 is in the form of an elongate linear piston and cylinder device, with a piston (not shown) arranged on the end of a piston rod 14 to be reciprocable within a cylinder 15 containing a damping fluid such as silicone, and with a compression spring (not shown) biasing the piston rod towards its extended position. The device is designed to produce a damped resistive force upon its compression, in known manner.
The damper unit 10 is mounted on the bracket 11 via an elongate, radiussed groove 13. This enables the damper unit 10 to have freedom to rotate about its longitudinal axis and to have freedom to move axially with respect to the bracket 11. The housing 12 is attachable to the bracket 11 by suitable means such as fasteners or spring clips and thereby retains the damper unit 10. The bracket 11 is itself attachable to the cup flange of the hinge by suitable means such as fasteners or spring clips, in known manner.
Extending laterally from the cylinder 15 is a wing 16, which in use protrudes out of an opening 17 in the housing 12. The wing 16 is designed to be engageable by an arm 32, which is part of the link mechanism of the hinge 31 (see
As seen best in
An end cap 22 is mounted in a hole 23 in the housing 12. The purpose of the end cap 22 is to allow adjustment of the axial end position of the cylinder 15. Adjusting the end position of the cylinder 15 effectively causes the rotational position of the wing 16 to vary, by operation of the two interengaging camming surfaces 18,19 of the camming device. Varying the rotational position of the wing 16 alters the point at which it is engaged by the arm 32 of the link mechanism of the hinge 31. Accordingly, adjustment of the end cap 22 effectively controls the damping response produced by the assembly.
To be fully useful, a damper assembly such as this must be capable of withstanding the forces generated by a slammed door. The helical profile of the camming device means that in addition to generating an axial component of force, it will also generate a radial component of force. When a door is slammed, the impact on the actuating wing 16 will be unusually high. This in turn means that an unusually high degree of radial force will be transmitted to the damper unit 10. In some cases, the radial force component can be sufficient to lead to distortion of the cylinder 15, potentially jamming the piston within it, or even causing a fatal fracture of the cylinder.
It will be noted that in the assembly seen in the drawings, the camming device is located at the end of the cylinder 15. In this position, the radial component of force generated by the slamming of a door will have least effect on the integrity of the cylinder 15. Moreover, the camming surface 18 is positioned on the cylinder 15 beyond the extent of the working stroke of the piston (indicated by the letter x in
With the camming surface 18 being situated at the end of the cylinder 15, the camming device is axially spaced apart from the position of the wing 16, which is located in a central region of the cylinder. This separation gives rise to the possibility that impact forces acting on the wing 16 (from a closing door) and transmitted by the camming device might cause some destabilisation of the seating of the cylinder 15. In particular, there might be a tendency for the cylinder 15 to be prised out of its proper engagement with the groove 13 on the bracket 11, especially under heavy impact loads. Increasing the radial depth of the camming surface 18 will help to some extent in combatting this problem by spreading the load. However, a more effective solution is the addition of a second camming device.
As seen in
The second camming surface 24 on the cylinder 15 is designed to engage a follower, here in the form of a second camming surface 25 on the bracket 11, the two together forming the second camming device. The second camming surface 25 extends in the same direction as the first camming surface 19 on the bracket 11 and has the same pitch.
The two camming devices formed by the two pairs of interengaging camming surfaces 18,19 and 24,25 are designed to work in tandem when the wing 16 experiences heavy impact loads. The additional area of working surface helps to spread the load. Also, the positioning of the second camming device in the vicinity of the wing 16 helps to provide a more direct transmission of forces and hence less tendency for de-stabilisation of the cylinder 15.
At lower impact loads, it may not be necessary for the second camming device to come into operation. For that reason, the axial separation between the two camming surfaces 18,24 on the cylinder 15 is designed to be slightly greater than the axial separation between the two camming surfaces 19,25 on the bracket 11. This means that under normal loading, only the first camming device will be in engagement, whereas if the cylinder 15 experiences higher loads sufficient to distort it, this will additionally bring the second camming device into engagement. For this purpose, the difference in separation need only be small, for example in the order of 0.1-0.2 mm.
It will be noted that the form of damper assembly seen in
The damper unit 10′ here is essentially the same as the damper unit 10 seen in
It will be appreciated that the camming devices that act as the movement converting mechanism described above could be configured in various other ways. For example, the roles of the two camming devices could be reversed. Also, the camming devices could be designed with one camming surface on the housing 12 and another on the bracket 11 or on the hinge cup flange 30,43. It would also be possible to provide the two camming devices at the same axial location, ie not spaced apart. For example, the camming devices could comprise two grooves in the outer surface of the cylinder, both extending helically around it, in the manner of a twin-start screw thread.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1609652.1 | Jun 2016 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/062165 | 5/19/2017 | WO | 00 |