This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to European App. No. 10166140.3, filed 16 Jun. 2010, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.
1. Field of Endeavor
The present invention relates to a damper arrangement and a method for designing same.
In particular, in the following reference to a damper arrangement having two or more Helmholtz dampers, connected in series and used to damp pressure oscillations or pulsations that may generate in a combustion chamber of a gas turbine, is made.
2. Brief Description of the Related Art
Gas turbines are known to have one or more combustion chambers, wherein a fuel is injected, mixed to an air flow and combusted, to generate high pressure flue gases that are expanded in a turbine.
During operation, pressure oscillations may generate that could cause mechanical and thermal damage to the combustion chamber and limit the operating regime.
For this reason, usually combustion chambers are provided with damping devices, such as quarter wave tubes, Helmholtz dampers or acoustic screens, to damp these pressure oscillations.
With reference to
The resonance frequency (i.e., the damped frequency) of the Helmholtz damper depends on the geometrical features of the resonator volume 3 and neck 4 and must correspond to the frequency of the pressure oscillations generated in the combustion chamber 5.
In order to address pressure oscillations having different frequencies, two or more Helmholtz dampers are used.
For example, DE 10 2005 062 284 discloses a damper arrangement having two or also more than two Helmholtz dampers connected in series, i.e., the neck of a Helmholtz damper is connected to the volume of another Helmholtz damper. This arrangement proved to be quite efficient in damping pressure oscillation having different, far apart frequencies, such as for example 15 Hz and 90 Hz.
Nevertheless, frequency pressure oscillations may slightly change from gas turbine to gas turbine and, in addition, also for the same gas turbine it may slightly change during gas turbine operation (for example part load, base load, transition).
Since at the low frequency range (where Helmholtz dampers are often used) the damping frequency bandwidth of the Helmholtz dampers is very narrow, such frequency shifting of the pressure oscillations generated in a combustion chamber could render a Helmholtz damper connected to it and having a prefixed design resonance frequency completely useless.
In these cases, traditionally systems for tuning of the resonance frequency are used.
For example, Helmholtz dampers have been developed having an adjustable volume.
WO 2005/059441 discloses a Helmholtz damper having two cup-shaped tubular bodies mounted in a telescopic way.
EP 1158247 discloses a Helmholtz damper whose resonance volume houses a flexible hollow element whose size may be changed by injecting or blowing off a gas; changing the size of the flexible hollow element allows the size of the resonance volume to be changed.
U.S. Patent Application Pub. No. 2005/0103018 discloses a Helmholtz damper whose resonance volume is divided into a fixed and a variable damping volume. The variable volume may be regulated by an adjustable piston.
Alternatively, tuning of the resonance frequency is achieved by adjusting the neck of the Helmholtz dampers.
In this respect, EP 0724684 discloses a Helmholtz damper in which the cross section of the neck may be adjusted.
EP 1624251 discloses a Helmholtz damper with a neck whose length may be adjusted by overlapping a holed plate to its mouth.
All these solutions proved to be quite complex and, in addition, they do not allow a fine tuning of the resonance frequency of the Helmholtz damper, to follow small shifting of the frequency pressure oscillations in the combustion chamber.
One of numerous aspects of the present invention therefore includes a damper arrangement and a method for designing same addressing the aforementioned problems of the known art.
Another aspect of the invention includes a damper arrangement and a method for designing same that permit damping of pressure oscillations in a large damping bandwidth, in particular when compared to the bandwidth of traditional damp arrangements made of Helmholtz dampers.
A further aspect of the invention includes a damper arrangement that is able to cope with the frequency shifting of the pressure oscillations with no or limited need of fine tuning.
Another aspect includes a damper arrangement that is very simple, in particular when compared to the traditional damper arrangements described above.
Further characteristics and advantages of the invention will be more apparent from the description of a preferred but non-exclusive embodiment of the damper arrangement and method, illustrated by way of non-limiting example in the accompanying drawings, in which:
With reference to
The resonance frequency of the first Helmholtz damper 11 and the resonance frequency of the second Helmholtz damper 12 are close or very close to one another and, in particular, they are shifted from one another in an amount producing a synergic damping effect.
The resonance frequencies of the Helmholtz dampers are close one another if the following relation is satisfied:
CL=(ω1−ω2)2/(ω1·ω2)≦1
In particular, very close means that CL<<1, wherein CL<<1 means at least one order of magnitude lower than 1.
The second Helmholtz damper 12 has a second volume 13 and a second neck 14 connectable to the inside of a chamber 15 wherein pressure oscillations to be damped may occur (for example a combustion chamber of a gas turbine), and the first Helmholtz damper 11 has a first damping volume 16 and a first neck 17 connected to the second volume 13.
Advantageously the first volume 16 and/or the second volume 13 are variable volumes.
In particular, as shown in the figures, one cylinder 20 housing a slidable piston 21 defines the first volume 16 at a side of the piston 21 and the second volume 13 at the other side of the piston 21; the piston 21 also defines the first neck 17; as shown in the figures, the first neck 17 is defined by holes in the piston 21.
In addition the piston is provided with a rod 25 connected to the piston 21 to move it and regulate its position as shown by arrow F; this regulation allows the volumes 16 and 13 to be regulated.
In particular, the embodiment of
In particular, the arrangement of
In this embodiment each of the pistons 21a, 21b is connected to a rod 28a, 28b (for example a hollow rod 28a connected to the piston 21a houses a second rod 28b connected to the piston 21b).
This allows regulation of the position of both pistons 21a, 21b independently from one another and, thus, regulation of the volumes 16, 26, 13.
This embodiment is similar to the one of
In addition, in the embodiment of the
Advantageously, the necks 17 and/or 17a and/or 17b may have a variable cross section.
In this respect,
The arrangement shown in
In this case, while the device having the chamber 15, wherein pressure oscillations may generate, is operated, the sensors 31 detect the pressure oscillations generated in the combustion chamber 15 and transmit a signal indicative thereof to the control unit 30; the control unit 30 activates the actuators 29 to regulate the positions of the pistons 21a, 21b until the pressure oscillations are damped in a broad bandwidth.
In this respect, the control unit 30 and the actuators 29 drive the pistons 21a, 21b such that the resonance frequencies of the Helmholtz dampers defining the arrangement (i.e., Helmholtz dampers defined respectively by volume 13 and neck 17c; volume 26 and neck 17b; volume 16 and necks 17a) are very close one to the other in an amount producing a synergic damping effect.
Naturally, an actuator 29, a control unit 30 and sensors 31 may also be connected to the arrangements shown in
Afterwards (i.e., when the particular configuration allowing larger bandwidth is achieved) the piston 21 or pistons 21a, 21b may be welded to the cylinder 20 to manufacture the arrangement 10.
The present invention also relates to methods for designing a damper arrangement.
Exemplary methods include providing at least a first Helmholtz damper 11 connected in series to a second Helmholtz damper 12 and shifting the resonance frequency of the first Helmholtz damper 11 and the resonance frequency of the second Helmholtz damper 12, one with respect to the another, until a displacement producing a synergic damping effect is found.
In particular, the resonance frequencies of the Helmholtz dampers of the arrangement are shifted one towards the other, to find a small displacement producing the synergic damping effect.
Shifting is achieved by regulating the first and/or second volume 16, 13 and/or regulating the cross section of the first neck, to regulate the flow velocity through the first neck. By an appropriate adjustment of the flow velocity inside the neck the broadband character can be adjusted.
The broadband character of the damping device depends on the non-dimensional value q, which is defined as
q=(ω0·LN)/(ζ·uN)
For the example of a damper having two volumes, ω0 is the arithmetic mean of the single frequencies of the single dampers, LN is the length of the intermediate neck, ζ is the loss coefficient of the intermediate neck, and uN is the flow velocity inside the intermediate neck.
Tests showed that the arrangements in the embodiments described herein have a synergic damping effect that allows a large damping bandwidth to be achieved.
The diagram was drawn providing a pipe closed at one end by a wall perpendicular to the pipe's axis. Then a damper arrangement was connected to the wall and at the other end (i.e., at the open end of the pipe) a source of pressure oscillations was provided (for example, a loudspeaker).
Thus pressure oscillations were generated and directed towards the wall. When impinging on the wall the pressure oscillations were partly damped (by the damping arrangement) and partly reflected. The larger the reflected pressure oscillations, the worse the damping efficiency of the damper arrangement, therefore values of the magnitude reflection coefficient close to 1 in the diagram of
Curve A refers to a traditional Helmholtz damper (for example a Helmholtz damper like the one shown in
Curve B refers to an arrangement of two Helmholtz dampers, whose resonance frequency is switched far apart, connected in series. It is clear from curve B that the damping bandwidth has two narrow damping areas (each area astride of the resonance frequency of one Helmholtz damper).
Curve C refers to an arrangement like the one of
It is clear from curve C that instead of two narrow damping areas, in the case of a synergic effect, the bandwidth has one damping area that is much larger than without a synergic effect.
Naturally the features described may be independently provided from one another.
In practice the materials used and the dimensions can be chosen at will according to requirements and to the state of the art.
1 traditional Helmholtz damper
2 enclosure
3 resonator volume
4 neck
5 combustion chamber
6 wall of 5
10 arrangement
11 first Helmholtz damper
12 second Helmholtz damper
13 volume of 12
14 neck of 12
15 combustion chamber
16 volume of 11
17 neck of 11
17
a, 17b, 17c necks
20 cylinder
21 piston
21
a, 21b piston
24 entrance for cooling air
25 rod
26 intermediate volume
28
a, 28b rod
29 actuator
30 control unit
31 sensor
33, 34 pieces of 21
35, 36 holes of 33, 34
A reflection coefficient of a traditional Helmholtz damper
B reflection coefficient of a traditional arrangement of Helmholtz dampers
C reflection coefficient of an arrangement of Helmholtz dampers in an embodiment of the invention
F movement of 25
While the invention has been described in detail with reference to exemplary embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes can be made, and equivalents employed, without departing from the scope of the invention. The foregoing description of the preferred embodiments of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practice of the invention. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to enable one skilled in the art to utilize the invention in various embodiments as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto, and their equivalents. The entirety of each of the aforementioned documents is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10166140 | Jun 2010 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5475189 | Field et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5489753 | Gibel | Feb 1996 | A |
7337877 | Goenka et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
20020100281 | Hellat et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20050223707 | Ikeda et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060059913 | Bethke et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20080066999 | Kostun et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102005062284 | Jan 2008 | DE |
0111336 | Jun 1984 | EP |
1010939 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1158247 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1568869 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1624251 | Feb 2006 | EP |
WO9511373 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO2005059441 | Jun 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Translation of DE 102005062284 A1, accessed Nov. 27, 2012. |
European Search Report for EP Patent App. No. 10166140.3 (Jan. 17, 2011). |
Office Action from European Patent App. No. 10166140.3 (Mar. 6, 2013). |
Valter Belucci, “Modeling and Control of Gas Turbine Thermoacoustic Pulsations” Dissertation, Berlin, Apr. 23, 2009, pp. 92-93. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110308654 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |