The present disclosure relates to dampers used with motor vehicle suspension systems, and more particularly to a damper having a spring seat designed in a manner, and from a material, which absorbs the energy produced if a coil spring of the damper fractures, and which operates to significantly reduce the chance of the fractured coil spring contacting a wheel of the vehicle.
The statements in this section merely provide background information related to the present disclosure and may not constitute prior art.
Strut-type suspension systems are well known in the motor vehicle industry. Such telescopic suspension systems are also commonly known as McPherson shock absorbers. A strut-type shock absorber assembly normally incorporates a hydraulic damper and is used as one of the locating members for the wheel of the motor vehicle. A strut-type shock absorber assembly typically includes a coil spring concentrically disposed around a shock absorber. The coil spring extends between an upper spring seat, which is a part of a top mount assembly for the strut-type shock absorber assembly, and a lower spring seat, which is attached to the shock absorber component of the strut-type shock absorber assembly.
The lower spring seat can be a single piece component made of metal or plastic. A plastic spring seat is lighter in weight than its metal counterpart, and for that reason is particular desirable with motor vehicle manufacturers for the reason that it reduces the weight of the overall assembly. An annular inner portion of the lower spring seat is designed to interface with an outer tube of the shock absorber. The lower spring seat supports and maintains the correct position of the coil spring under various driving conditions of the vehicle. The lower spring seat resists braking loads, wear, abrasion, changing loads and impacts by stones and other road debris.
During a severe impact, however, the coil spring may fail (i.e., fracture). For this reason the lower spring seat may incorporate some structure that acts as a “catcher” to catch the fractured spring and reduce the chance of the fractured spring contacting the wheel of the vehicle. As such, the construction of the lower spring seat is a highly important consideration in the design of a strut-type shock absorber assembly.
A significant challenge when designing a plastic or composite reinforced spring seat component, however, is the generally low toughness of spring seats made from plastics or composites, when compared to spring seat components made from common metals such as steel. Accordingly, improving the toughness of a spring seat member, and particularly the catcher, without tangibly increasing its weight or expense, has proven to be a significant challenge.
In one aspect the present disclosure relates to a strut-type damper. The damper may comprise a shock absorber having a housing with a telescoping piston rod projecting at least partially therefrom, a coil spring, an upper spring seat and a lower spring seat. The upper spring seat may be operably coupled to a distal end of the piston rod. The lower spring seat may be operatively coupled to the housing of the shock absorber. The upper and lower spring seats capture the coil spring therebetween. The lower spring seat includes a base portion having an opening for receiving the housing of the shock absorber and is fixedly securable to the housing. The lower spring seat also includes a generally circumferential wall portion extending from the base portion which forms a catcher for catching a portion of the coil spring in an event where the coil spring fractures. An impact absorbing structure is formed on the lower spring seat adjacent both of the catcher and the base portion, and configured to be crushed in the event of a fracture of the coil spring.
In another aspect the present disclosure relates to a strut-type damper. The damper may comprise a shock absorber having a housing with a telescoping piston rod projecting at least partially therefrom. The damper may also comprise a coil spring, an upper spring seat and a lower spring seat. The upper spring seat may be operably coupled to a distal end of the piston rod. The lower spring seat may be operatively coupled to the housing of the shock absorber, with the upper and lower spring seats capturing the coil spring therebetween. The lower spring seat may include a base portion having an opening for receiving the housing of the shock absorber and may be fixedly securable to the housing. The lower spring seat may also include a generally circumferential wall portion extending from the base portion and integrally formed with the base portion. The generally circumferential wall portion forms a catcher for catching a portion of the coil spring in an event where the coil spring fractures. The lower spring seat further includes a plurality of circumferentially spaced apart, impact absorbing structures formed on the lower spring seat adjacent both of the catcher and the base portion, and extending from an inside wall portion of the catcher. Each impact absorbing structure is configured to be crushed in the event of a fracture of the coil spring and to absorb and dissipate energy from a broken portion of a fractured coil spring.
In still another aspect the present disclosure relates to a strut-type damper. The damper may comprise a shock absorber having a housing with a telescoping piston rod projecting at least partially therefrom, a coil spring, an upper spring seat and a lower spring seat. The upper spring seat is operably coupled to a distal end of the piston rod. The lower spring seat is operatively coupled to the housing of the shock absorber, with the upper and lower spring seats capturing the coil spring therebetween. The lower spring seat may include a base portion having an opening for receiving the housing of the shock absorber and is fixedly securable to the housing. The lower spring seat also includes a generally circumferential wall portion extending from the base portion and being integrally formed with the base portion. The generally circumferential wall portion forms a catcher for catching a portion of the coil spring in an event where the coil spring fractures. A plurality of circumferentially spaced apart, impact absorbing structures are formed on the lower spring seat adjacent both of the catcher and the base portion, and may extend from an inside wall portion of the catcher. Each impact absorbing structure is configured to be crushed in the event of a fracture of the coil spring and to absorb and dissipate energy from a broken portion of a fractured coil spring. Each impact absorbing structure may include a first crush rib extending from an inside wall portion of the catcher radially inwardly toward an axial center of the lower spring seat. The first crush rib is configured to absorb and dissipate energy from a portion of the coil spring when the coil spring fractures. Each impact absorbing structure may also include a second crush rib for further helping to absorb and dissipate energy from the portion of the fractured coil spring. The second crush rib may be integrally formed with the first crush rib and arranged generally tangentially relative to an axial center of the lower spring seat. The lower spring seat and the impact absorbing structures may also be integrally formed as a single piece component.
In still another aspect the present disclosure involves using an independent system to absorb impacts. The independent system is formed by a plate having a plurality of rib structures projecting outwardly from a floor portion of the plate. The plate is intended to rest within a catcher portion of a lower spring seat.
Further areas of applicability will become apparent from the description provided herein. It should be understood that the description and specific examples are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
The drawings described herein are for illustration purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure in any way.
The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the present disclosure, application, or uses. It should be understood that throughout the drawings, corresponding reference numerals indicate like or corresponding parts and features.
Referring to
Referring to
The lower spring seat 18 in this example may be formed from a non-metallic, lightweight material, for example a high strength plastic or a composite. A principal feature of the catcher 28 is the inclusion of a plurality of integrally formed, radially arranged impact absorbing structures 38. In this example the impact absorbing structures 38 take the form of T-shaped structures when viewed in plan (i.e., when looking straight down on an inside surface 26a of the base portion 26).
With reference to
Since the first crush ribs 40 project from both an inside surface wall portion 28a of the catcher 28, as well as an inner surface 26a of the base portion 26, they are directly exposed to the coil spring impact if the coil spring 16 fractures. The first crush ribs 40 thus form impact absorbing elements that are designed to deform (i.e., be partially or substantially crushed) to at least partially absorb and dissipate the energy from the fractured coil spring portion if the coil spring 16 fractures. The first crush ribs 40 in one example have a thickness of preferably about 1 mm-3 mm, although it will be appreciated that this dimension may vary depending on various factors, including, but not limited to, the dimensions of the coil spring 16 and/or the cross sectional thickness of its coils. The second crush ribs 42 are designed to collectively form a circumferential plane that further help to ensure that the first crush ribs 40 do not “fold” or collapse too easily toward the base portion 26 when impacted by the broken portion of the coil spring 16. In some instances it may occur that one or more of the second crush ribs 42 receive all or a majority of the impact force from a fractured coil spring. In summary then, both of the first and second crush ribs 40 and 42 cooperatively operate to absorb and dissipate the energy that is produced when the coil spring 16 fractures.
Referring briefly to
Referring to
Referring to 7, another embodiment 34′ of the coil locating rib 34 shown. Coil locating rib 36 could likewise be constructed in an identical manner to coil locating rib 34′. Coil locating rib 34′ has been modified to include a radial portion 34a′ having a first portion 34a1 and a second portion 34a2. Second portion 34a2 extends out to the wall portion 28 of the lower spring seat 18. The second portion 34a2 thus further helps to reinforce the catcher 28.
Referring to
It will be appreciated that the configuration and dimensions of the various embodiments of the impact absorbing structures 38 described herein may be varied considerably to tailor them to specific coil spring dimensions, spring rates, and other factors. The weight and/or type of vehicle that the strut-type damper 10 is being used with may also influence the number and precise configuration and/or placement of the impact absorbing structures 38.
The lower spring seat 18, and particularly the construction of the catcher 28, thus forms a means to significantly strengthen the catcher without significantly increasing its weight, dimensions or bulk, or cost of manufacture. Importantly, the catcher 28 of the present disclosure does not require any significant modifications to the construction of a coil spring or to any other portion of a strut-type damper. The entire lower spring seat 18, catcher 28 and impact absorbing structures 38, 38′ or 38″ may be integrally formed as a single component from high strength plastic, from a composite or any other suitably strong, lightweight material.
While various embodiments have been described, those skilled in the art will recognize modifications or variations which might be made without departing from the present disclosure. The examples illustrate the various embodiments and are not intended to limit the present disclosure. Therefore, the description and claims should be interpreted liberally with only such limitation as is necessary in view of the pertinent prior art.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2147660 | Loewus | Feb 1939 | A |
3857726 | Van Gils | Dec 1974 | A |
4119748 | Verbauwhede et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4366969 | Benya et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4462608 | Lederman | Jul 1984 | A |
4562997 | Iwata et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4683993 | Tanabe et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
5454585 | Dronen et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5467971 | Hurtubise et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5553713 | Sydekum et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5620172 | Fulks et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5664892 | Kellam | Sep 1997 | A |
5788262 | Dazy et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6126155 | Smith et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6155544 | Solomond et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6273407 | Germano | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6367830 | Annequin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382648 | Handke | May 2002 | B1 |
6398201 | Solomond et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6412879 | Ogoniek et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6692012 | Fullenkamp et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7077390 | Miller et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7090058 | Miyazaki et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7416175 | Al-Dahhan | Aug 2008 | B2 |
8109492 | Winocur | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8196941 | Nowak | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8348029 | Winocur | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8382080 | Suchta et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8496383 | Viault et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8616538 | Al-Dahhan et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8696004 | Baker et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8939439 | Corbett et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
20020158393 | Handke | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030047399 | Miller et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030218286 | Miyazaki et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040051270 | Causemann | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040074589 | Gessler et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040159993 | Miller et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20070194507 | Kato et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20090166940 | Lutz | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100032877 | Suchta et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100230877 | Schudt et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110266765 | Nowak | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120181127 | Keil et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130052392 | Radlmayr et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130147149 | Baker et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140045400 | Vandewalle | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20150123329 | Toyota | May 2015 | A1 |
20160023529 | Wilkin | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160031282 | Hernette et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160137017 | Wilkin | May 2016 | A1 |
20160185177 | Kaneko | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102008043527 | May 2010 | DE |
102010028290 | Nov 2011 | DE |
102011051403 | Jan 2013 | DE |
10312085 | Oct 2014 | DE |
567845 | Nov 1993 | EM |
1483137 | Apr 2007 | EM |
2960542 | Dec 2015 | EP |
2347906 | Sep 2000 | GB |
2010116113 | May 2010 | JP |
3044549 | Jun 2001 | WO |
2003076234 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2004101909 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005118263 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2009062764 | May 2009 | WO |
2013041254 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013041255 | Mar 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Matthij, Paul, et al., “Tailored Fiber Placement-Mechanical Properties and Applications”, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, Jun. 1998, pp. 774-786, vol. 17, No. 9, Technomic Publishing, US. |
Crothers, P.J., et al., “Tailored Fibre Placement to Minimise Stress Concentrations”, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, Jan. 1, 1997, pp. 619-625, vol. 28A, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, NL. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170274719 A1 | Sep 2017 | US |