The present invention relates to a damping structure and applications of such a damping structure.
A preferred application relates to the use of the damping structure to damp out vibrations of vibrating components such as the main gearbox of a rotary wing aircraft, particularly a helicopter, especially with a view to reducing the noise in the cockpit and/or in the passenger cabin of said aircraft.
It is known that, in a rotary wing aircraft, the acoustic spectra defined in the range between 20 Hz and 20 kHz are the result of the superposition of noises of various origins which can be grouped into two different groups depending on their spectral characteristics, namely pure sounds or narrowband noise and broadband noise.
In the known way, pure sound or narrowband noise occurs in particular, as appropriate:
All this noise is of course troublesome for the pilots and the passengers.
There are various known solutions for reducing such noise inside a rotary wing aircraft, particularly a helicopter.
The object of a first known solution is to reduce the level of vibration or the radiation of sources of noise and/or of the fuselage. To this end, various physical actions can be taken, particularly:
The first four physical actions listed above make it possible to reduce the overall noise level in a broad range of frequencies, but would lead to a significant and highly disadvantageous increase in mass. In addition, the obtained reduction in noise is not selective enough to eliminate the acoustic annoyance specific to the emergence of pure sounds.
By contrast, the fifth and final physical action listed above makes it possible effectively to reduce narrowband noise, but still only in a narrow band of frequencies, defined during design.
This first solution listed above and based on a passive treatment of the noise is therefore not completely effective, particularly in the case of narrowband noise generated by vibrational excitation.
A second known solution recommends creating passive soundproofing in the form of cladding panels mounted in the cockpit or in the passenger cabin. These panels are designed according to the structural area that is to be treated and according to the spectrum of frequencies to be attenuated.
However, this second solution also has numerous disadvantages and, in particular:
In consequence, neither of these two known solutions listed above is satisfactory in reducing the annoyance caused by noise, particularly narrowband noise.
One of the objects of the present invention is to propose a solution that makes it possible to reduce such noise.
To this end, the present invention relates to a damping structure which is simple and inexpensive to produce, having numerous advantages and which can be used in various applications to deaden the vibrations generated by vibrating sources, particularly with a view to reducing noise, and to do so particularly in a rotary wing aircraft such as a helicopter.
To this end, said damping structure is notable, according to the invention, in that it has an internal cavity and comprises:
Thus, when said structure is subjected to vibration, these vibrations are transmitted to the (contacting) solid bodies of the aggregate, via the various points of contact. On crossing each of these points of contact, some of the vibrational energy is dissipated through friction so that said vibration is then damped quickly and effectively within said structure.
As a preference, said structure is elongate, for example in the form of a bar, and said internal cavity is formed longitudinally inside said elongate structure.
In the context of the present invention, said solid bodies, which are, for example, made of synthetic material, preferably beads, may be:
In addition, according to the invention, said solid bodies may be made of different materials (synthetic material, metal, etc.) and/or have different shapes and/or different sizes (diameters).
It will be noted that:
Furthermore, advantageously, said structure additionally comprises at least one internal partition, solid or pierced, of any shape, particularly tubular, which may or may not be secured to the wall of said structure and which is arranged inside said internal cavity.
This makes it possible to increase the area for exchange (friction) between the structure and the aggregate and therefore also the damping of the vibrations.
Furthermore, advantageously:
In addition to the aforementioned advantages, the damping structure according to the invention also has the following advantages:
In one particular application, said structure may be produced in the form of a hollow pinion (of a gearbox or of any other mechanical device) which is filled with said aggregate according to the invention.
The present invention also relates to a suspension system for a gearbox of a rotary wing aircraft, particularly a helicopter.
According to the invention, said suspension system which comprises a number of suspension bars is noteworthy in that at least one of said suspension bars comprises a structure as mentioned hereinabove.
Thus, the equivalent damping of at least one of said bars is improved, which makes it possible effectively, in the cockpit and/or the passenger cabin of the aircraft, to reduce the noise propagated through solid which is transmitted by said treated bars.
The present invention also relates to two types of damping device using the aforementioned structure, for damping the vibration of any vibrating component, for example:
A first of these damping devices comprises a damping structure according to the invention which is arranged between the vibrating component and a support.
It will be noted that the structure used is rigid and can either be attached in an empty space or directly replace an element that already exists for performing other functions, particularly mechanical or structural functions, such as a connecting rod for example.
A second damping device for damping vibration of a vibrating component comprising at least one hollow element, for example a suspension bar for suspending said vibrating component, is obtained by producing said element in the form of the aforementioned damping structure. In the context of the present invention, the cavity of this element may either be a cavity that already exists or a cavity made specifically for implementing the present invention.
This second damping device has the additional advantage of not increasing the space occupancy.
The figures of the appended drawing will make it easy to understand how the invention may be embodied. In these figures, identical references denote elements which are similar.
The damping structure 1 according to the invention and depicted schematically in
According to the invention, said structure 1 comprises:
Thus, when the structure 1 is subjected to vibration, for example longitudinal vibration E or lateral vibration F, this vibration is transmitted via the walls 3 and 4 to the solid bodies 9 (which are in contact) of the aggregate 8 which is pressed, via the various points of contact. On crossing each of these points of contact, some of the vibrational energy is dissipated through friction which means that said vibration is then damped quickly and effectively in said structure 1, as is depicted in
Of course, the structure 1 may have various shapes, and vary in its degree of massiveness. As a preference, however, it has an elongate shape, in the form bar for example, and said internal cavity 2 is formed longitudinally to said structure 1 inside a tubular chamber 6, as depicted in
In the context of the present invention, said solid bodies 9, which are made, for example of synthetic material, preferably beads, may be:
In addition, according to the invention, said solid bodies 9:
It will be noted that:
In addition to said solid bodies 9, which may be compact or hollow, the aggregate 8 may also contain a viscous liquid, for example oil, filling the empty spaces in the chamber 6 between said solid bodies 9. These are then immersed in a lubricating medium, which makes it possible to delay any heating that might occur.
Moreover, in a preferred form of embodiment depicted in
Furthermore, the damping structure 1 according to the invention additionally comprises at least one internal partition 13, which is secured to a wall 3 or 4 of the chamber 6 of the structure 1 and which is arranged inside the cavity 2.
By way of illustration, various examples of partition 13 are depicted:
As can be seen from these
These internal partitions 13 make it possible to increase the exchange area and therefore the area for friction between, on the one hand, the interior faces of the walls 3, 4 of the chamber 6 and, on the other hand, the aggregate 8, something which makes it possible to increase the damping of the vibration of the structure 1.
In addition to the aforementioned advantages, the structure 1 according to the invention also has the following advantages:
The physical effect of the filling (of the cavity 2 by the aggregate 8) on the vibrational behavior of an initially hollow structure 1 (the cavity 2 existing, but being empty) will be specified hereinbelow with reference to
Three different types of loading of the hollow structures 1 may be dealt with by filling with an aggregate 8, namely:
The vibrational response of a hollow structure 1 is considered as the linear superposition of second-order system responses, each characterized by a natural frequency, modal damping, a modal mass and a modal stiffness.
At a given frequency, the structure 1 and the collection of aggregate 8 may be replaced by two coupled systems depicted in
The filling of the cavity 2 modifies the vibrational response of the structure 1 but does not modify the excitation force F0 originating from the excitation upstream (the housing, for example, in the case of a helicopter main gearbox).
Under harmonic conditions, the respective displacements during the time x1(t) and x2(t), the respective velocities v1(t) and v2(t) and the respective accelerations γ1(t) and γ2(t) satisfy, for any angular frequency ω of the excitation force of amplitude F, where F0(t)=F(ω).sin(ωt):
v1(t)=jωx1(t) and v(2)t=jωx2(t)
γ1(t)=−ω2x1(t) and γ2=−ω2x2(t).
The sum of the applied forces (return forces, friction force due to the coupling with the other mass, and possibly external force F0) for each mass being equal to its inertial force, it is therefore possible to write, for each mass:
From there, it is easy to determine (by considering the frequency f in Hz) the force/acceleration amplitude spectrum and the spectrum of the phase shift of the acceleration with respect to force, these being accessible through measurement (with f=ω/2π and fA=ωA/2π, fA and ωA being, respectively, the natural frequency and the natural angular frequency of the structure A (unfilled structure 1)).
From that, it can be deduced that the effect of the filling (aggregate 8) of the chamber 6 on the vibrational behavior of the structure 1 results in:
Furthermore, the coefficient CB may be expressed theoretically near the natural mode ωA by:
CB=αB2πfA mB tan(δB)
with:
It is therefore found to be true that:
Optimizing the damping consists in increasing CB, that is to say the damping mass of the aggregate 8, which is defined by αB mB tan(δB).
The technological parameters that allow this damping mass to be increased are:
Numerous applications are of course possible for the damping structure 1 according to the invention.
In particular, said structure 1 can be used to damp vibration of various types of vibrating component. It may thus, in particular, be employed as part:
According to the invention, in order to suspend a vibrating component with respect to a support in such a way as to isolate the latter from the vibration of said vibrating component, one or more structures 1, particularly in the form of bars, may:
The last two solutions additionally have the advantage of not adding to the bulk.
Preferred applications of the damping structure 1 relate to the reduction of noise-generating vibration in a rotary-wing aircraft, particularly a helicopter, and in particular to reducing:
The particular application of the invention depicted in
To do this, the suspension bars 15 each comprise a damping structure 1 according to the invention, as can be seen in the case of one of these bars 15 which is partially cut away in FIG. 13.
This is done in order to reduce, in the cabin, the noise propagated through solid transmitted by the bars 15, that is to say the vibrational energy transmitted by said bars 15, indicated by an expression |H(f)∥γbar|2(f) specified hereinbelow.
In general, it may be considered that the acoustic pressure spectrum in the cabin of the helicopter He, denoted Pcab(f), satisfies the following quadratic relationship:
Pcab2(f)=|T(f)∥Pdirect|2(f)+|H(f)∥γbar|2(f)+|Q(f)∥γstructure|2(f)
Specifically, this summing of squared amplitudes indicates the balance of energy transfers for the meshing noise at frequencies higher than 500 Hz. There is no need to take account of the phase relationships between the pressure in the cabin and the direct pressure or accelerations of the structure (fuselage) of the helicopter He, given the great many acoustic modes present in the cabin at these frequencies.
It will be noted that:
From the foregoing, it would seem that the reduction of the noise in the cabin will be significant at the meshing frequencies for which the following relationship is satisfied in the absence of treatment:
|H(f)∥γbar|2(f)>>|T(f)∥Pdirect|2(f)+|Q(f)∥γstructure|2(f).
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
00 04680 | Apr 2000 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR01/01074 | 4/9/2001 | WO | 00 | 2/20/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO01/79725 | 10/25/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
123999 | King | Feb 1872 | A |
1995620 | Monroe | Mar 1935 | A |
2417347 | Brown | Mar 1947 | A |
3417660 | Harbrecht et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3929729 | Chung | Dec 1975 | A |
4458862 | Mouille et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4504044 | Shtarkman | Mar 1985 | A |
4509730 | Shtarkman | Apr 1985 | A |
4566678 | Anderson | Jan 1986 | A |
4713917 | Buckle et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4899323 | Fukahori et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4913410 | Marshall | Apr 1990 | A |
4974794 | Aubry et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5020644 | Novoa | Jun 1991 | A |
5316240 | Girard et al. | May 1994 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0499526 | Aug 1992 | EP |
756835 | Sep 1956 | GB |
1280301 | Jul 1972 | GB |
1293391 | Oct 1972 | GB |
0859716 | Sep 1981 | RU |
8505425 | Dec 1985 | WO |
9948951 | Sep 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030098389 A1 | May 2003 | US |