Data architecture for supporting multiple search models

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11734234
  • Patent Number
    11,734,234
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, February 16, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 22, 2023
    a year ago
  • Inventors
    • Rodriguez; Mary Ann Ortega (Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, US)
    • Kaminsky; Helen (Irvine, CA, US)
    • Das; Manas Kumar (Irvine, CA, US)
    • Raswan; Maneesh (Irvine, CA, US)
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Leroux; Etienne P
    Agents
    • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • CPC
  • Field of Search
    • CPC
    • G06F16/212
    • G06F16/27
    • G06F16/245
    • G06F16/248
    • G06F16/9535
    • G06F9/54
  • International Classifications
    • G06F16/21
    • G06F16/27
    • G06F16/245
    • G06F16/248
    • G06F16/9535
    • G06F9/54
    • Disclaimer
      This patent is subject to a terminal disclaimer.
      Term Extension
      130
Abstract
Embodiments include a search and match computing system configured to: access, from a third party computing system, a query regarding at least one entity; determine if the query is a structured query or an unstructured query; process the query with at least one of an application programming interface configured to receive structured queries or a second application programming interface receive unstructured queries; initiate a search and match application configured to execute queries on at least one of: a relational data scheme or a non-relational data scheme; receive search results from the at least one of: the relational data scheme or the non-relational data scheme; and process the received search results to generate an output data packet for access by the third party computing system.
Description
BACKGROUND

The disclosure relates to a data architecture for supporting a blended and unified search platform hosting multiple search models in a plug and play environment.


SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

Various systems, methods, and devices are disclosed for providing a token gateway environment for providing authorization to parties accessing protected resources. The systems, methods, and devices of the disclosure each have several innovative aspects, no single one of which is solely responsible for the desirable attributes disclosed herein.


In one embodiment, a system is disclosed. The system includes: a relational data scheme storing a first repository of data records associated with a first plurality of entities, wherein each entity is associated with a unique identifier; a non-relational data scheme storing a second repository of data records associated with a second plurality of entities, wherein each entity is associated with a unique identifier, and wherein the second repository includes at least part of the data records associated with the first plurality of entities; and a search and match computing system in electronic communication with a third party computing system, the search and match computing system comprising: a first application programming interface configured to receive structured queries; a second application programming interface configured to receive unstructured queries; a search and match application configured to execute inquiries on the relational data scheme; and a search and match application configured to execute inquiries on the non-relational data scheme; wherein the search and match computing system further comprises instructions, that when executed by the search and match computing system, are configured to: access, from the third party computing system, a query regarding at least one entity; determine if the query is a structured query or an unstructured query; process the query with at least one of the first application programming interface or the second application programming interface; initiate the search and match application for at least one of: the relational data scheme or the non-relational data scheme; receive search results from the at least one of: the relational data scheme or the non-relational data scheme; and process the received search results to generate an output data packet for access by the third party computing system.


In another embodiment, a computer-implemented method for providing entity information is disclosed. The computer-implemented method includes, as implemented by one or more computing devices within a search and match computing system in electronic communication with a third party computing system, the search and match computing system configured with specific executable instructions: receiving, from the third party computing system, a query regarding at least one entity; determining if the query is a structured query or an unstructured query; processing the query with at least one of: an application programming interface configured to receive structured queries or an application programming interface configured to receive unstructured queries; initiating at least one of: a search and match application configured to execute inquiries on a relational data scheme or a search and match application configured to execute inquiries on a non-relational data scheme, wherein the relational data scheme stores a first repository of data records associated with a first plurality of entities, wherein each entity is associated with a unique identifier and the non-relational data scheme stores a second repository of data records associated with a second plurality of entities, wherein each entity is associated with a unique identifier, and wherein the second repository includes at least part of the data records associated with the first plurality of entities; receiving search results from the at least one of: the relational data scheme or the non-relational data scheme; and processing the received search results to generate an output data packet for access by the third party computing system.


In a further embodiment, a non-transitory computer storage medium storing computer-executable instructions is disclosed. The computer-executable instructions, when executed by a processor, can cause the processor to at least: receive, from a third party computing system, a query regarding at least one entity; determine if the query is a structured query or an unstructured query; process the query with at least one of: an application programming interface configured to receive structured queries or an application programming interface configured to receive unstructured queries; initiate at least one of: a search and match application configured to execute inquiries on a relational data scheme or a search and match application configured to execute inquiries on a non-relational data scheme, wherein the relational data scheme stores a first repository of data records associated with a first plurality of entities, wherein each entity is associated with a unique identifier and the non-relational data scheme stores a second repository of data records associated with a second plurality of entities, wherein each entity is associated with a unique identifier, and wherein the second repository includes at least part of the data records associated with the first plurality of entities; receive search results from the at least one of: the relational data scheme or the non-relational data scheme; and process the received search results to generate an output data packet for access by the third party computing system.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this disclosure will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in, and constitute a part of, this specification, illustrate embodiments of the disclosure.


Throughout the drawings, reference numbers are re-used to indicate correspondence between referenced elements. The drawings are provided to illustrate embodiments of the subject matter described herein and not to limit the scope thereof. Specific embodiments will be described with reference to the following drawings.



FIG. 1 is an overall system diagram depicting one embodiment of a data architecture for supporting multiple search models.



FIGS. 2A, 2B and 2C are block diagrams illustrating embodiments of information flow within the data architecture for supporting multiple search models.



FIGS. 3A and 3B are block diagrams illustrating embodiments of a search and match application for big data.



FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process for serving a batch search query on big data.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process for serving a batch search query on mainframe data.



FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process for transmitting mainframe data to big data.



FIG. 7 is a general system diagram illustrating an embodiment of a computing system.





DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS EMBODIMENTS

Embodiments of the disclosure will now be described with reference to the accompanying figures. The terminology used in the description presented herein is not intended to be interpreted in any limited or restrictive manner, simply because it is being utilized in conjunction with a detailed description of embodiments of the disclosure. Furthermore, embodiments of the disclosure may include several novel features, no single one of which is solely responsible for its desirable attributes or which is essential to practicing the embodiments of the disclosure herein described. For purposes of this disclosure, certain aspects, advantages, and novel features of various embodiments are described herein. It is to be understood that not necessarily all such advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment. Thus, for example, those skilled in the art will recognize that one embodiment may be carried out in a manner that achieves one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.


I. Overview

Features are described for embodiments of a data architecture for supporting a blended and unified search platform hosting multiple search models in a plug and play environment. The architecture allows the support of different search applications built and deployed on various systems to cater to different search use cases. For example, some search applications may handle structured queries, while others accept unstructured queries, while still others accept search keys. Additionally, some search applications may be hosted by mainframe systems and others by distributed systems. The architecture also allows the searching of different data collections. For example, some legacy environments may have data stored in mainframe systems, while newer environments may have data stored in a big data ecosystem. Additionally, the architecture allows for different search algorithms and filters to be developed independently from the search application receiving the query, and the data collection searched.


A structured or unstructured query may be entered on a mainframe or distributed system. A blended search engine platform including application programming interfaces (APIs) for handling the various types of queries processes the query to initiate the appropriate search and match application for on one or both of mainframe and big data in order to respond to the query. The data architecture allows for the search and match to be performed on one or both of mainframe and big data in a more efficient and accurate manner than on legacy systems.


II. System


FIG. 1 is an overall system diagram depicting one embodiment of a data architecture for supporting a blended and unified search platform hosting multiple search models in a plug and play environment. The architecture includes mainframe systems 105, distributed systems 110, a blended search engine platform 120, mainframe data 130, big data 140, and a scheduler 135. In one embodiment, the various components of the architecture may communicate via one or more networks, which may include one or more of a local area network, a wide area network, the Internet, or a cloud-computing network, implemented via a wired, wireless, or combination of wired and wireless communication links.


A. Example Mainframe Systems and Distributed Systems


The architecture shown in FIG. 1 includes mainframe systems 105 receiving structured queries or data 105A and unstructured queries 105B, and distributed systems 110 receiving structured queries or data 110A and unstructured queries 110B.


In various embodiments, the mainframe systems 105 may include computers or computer system architectures used by organizations for applications including bulk data processing and/or transaction processing. A mainframe system may include a central data repository in the organization's data processing center, linked to users through workstations or terminals.


The distributed systems 110 may include a group of computers running software that communicate together so as to appear as a single local machine.


Distributed systems platforms may include multi-user, multi-tasking, time-sharing operating systems.


Mainframe and distributed systems each have their list of advantages and disadvantages. Depending on an organization's needs, both platforms may be needed or desired and different platforms may be used by requesting organizations. Therefore, the architecture disclosed herein accommodates queries and data from both mainframe systems 105 and distributed systems 110.


The queries and data may be structured (105A and 110A) or unstructured (105B and 110B). In general, as used herein, a structured query refers to a search query for structured data, whereas an unstructured query refers to a search query for unstructured data. Structured data is typically characterized in a pre-defined data format, such as with predefined fields and/or field value types. Structured data may reside in relational databases or data warehouses. Unstructured data typically has no pre-defined data formats, such as a text string, and it may reside in applications, NoSQL databases, data warehouses, or data lakes.


B. Blended Search Engine Platform


The architecture shown in FIG. 1 includes a blended search engine platform 120 including an API configured to receive structured queries 120A and an API configured to receive unstructured queries 120B, as well as search and match application for mainframe data 125A and search and match application for big data 125B.


1. Example Application Programming Interfaces


In various embodiments, the structured queries or data 105A and 110A may be received through an API configured to receive structured queries 120A. Unstructured queries 105B may be received through an API configured to receive unstructured queries 120B.


The respective APIs make it easier for the different queries to communicate with the search and match applications to search the mainframe data and the big data. In general, the use of such APIs helps support the overall architecture's goal of providing a plug and play environment. For example, if a search query is received from a new system, or if a new type of search and match application is developed, there is no need to change the whole architecture, rather the appropriate modifications are done to the respective API to accommodate for the new system and/or application.


2. Example Search and Match Applications


After a query is processed by one of the APIs 120A or 120B, the processed query is passed on to one or both of the search and match application for mainframe data 125A and/or search and match application for big data 125B based on the search rules. As will be described further below, some search rules may search mainframe data if there are missing results after searching big data.


The search and match applications for mainframe data 125A may include search logic and algorithms for searching structured data. There are many existing search and match applications such as, for example Structured Query Language (SQL).


An example of a search and match application for big data 125B used in the architecture disclosed herein is Apache Solr. Solr is an open source enterprise search platform, written in Java. Its major features include full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search, real-time indexing, dynamic clustering, database integration, NoSQL features and rich document (for example, Word, PDF) handling. Providing distributed search and index replication, Solr is designed for scalability and fault tolerance. Solr is widely used for enterprise search and analytics use cases. Solr runs as a standalone full-text search server. It uses a Java search library at its core for full-text indexing and search, and has REST-like HTTP/XML and JSON APIs that make it usable from most popular programming languages. Solr's external configuration allows it to be tailored to many types of application without Java coding, and it has a plugin architecture to support more advanced customization. It is recognized that other big data platforms could be used.


C. Data Environments


The mainframe data 130 typically includes only structured data stored on a database 132. In various embodiments, the database 132 may be any relational database, such as for example a DB2 database.


Big data 140 is a non-relational, distributed, open-source and scalable data environment. The data environment may include a data lake 140B, with the understanding that a data lake is a massive, easily accessible centralized repository of large volumes of structured and unstructured data. An example of data lake 140B includes the Apache HBase™ database. An open-source framework for processing and analyzing the big data can be used to sift through the repository. An example of such an open-source framework is Apache Hadoop, but it is recognized that others could also be used.


D. Scheduler


The architecture disclosed herein provides the ability for search and matching on big data that includes mainframe data. This is accomplished by making the data stored on the relational database 132 available on big data. In the illustrated embodiment, a scheduler 135 and storage clusters 140A are used to port data from mainframe to big data. In some embodiments, the storage clusters 140A may be Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) storage clusters. Other types of storage clusters may also be used. Embodiments of a process for this transformation of data is described further below in reference to FIGS. 2C and 6.


III. Example Application

In one example, the architecture described herein may be used by support customers of a credit reporting agency's business intelligence information. The customers of the credit reporting agency wishing to access such business intelligence information may include financial institutions wishing to provide credit to businesses. Different financial institutions may want to access the credit reporting agency's products and services via different types of systems, such as mainframe systems and/or distributed systems.


The credit reporting agency may store vast amounts of historical data on businesses, stored on mainframe databases. The data is also dynamic, as companies change names, ownership, addresses, and affiliations with larger entities. Additionally, business intelligence may increasingly be available through new sources such as social media, and business intelligence may be stored in big data. The credit reporting agency platform may make the data available on the mainframe systems accessible via the big data as well.


When a financial institution wishes to access the credit reporting agency for obtaining business information on a given business entity (or for providing such business information, including, for example, recent transactions with various business entities), using the architecture described herein, the financial institution may query the credit reporting agency and be blind to what type of data environment the business intelligence is stored on. Further, the query may be received from either a mainframe or distributed system, in either a real-time, single query mode, or in a batch mode.


In order to associate business information relating to a business across multiple data environments, the credit reporting agency may, in some examples, associate a unique identifier to all data relating to the business. Then, when a query is received, the search and match applications may search one or more respective data environments for data associated with the business identifier based on the search rules. For example, if data associated with the business identifier is not found on big data, then a search may be performed on mainframe data, or a search may be performed on both mainframe and big data.


IV. Example Information Flows


FIGS. 2A, 2B and 2C are block diagrams illustrating embodiments of information flow within the data architecture for supporting multiple search models.


A. Real-Time Query



FIG. 2A illustrates an embodiment of information flow for a single/real-time query from either a mainframe or distributed system. The information flow includes the mainframe or distributed systems 105 and/or 110, the mainframe data 130 and the big data 140, as well as the blended search engine platform 120.


As illustrated in FIG. 2A, at (1), a third party accessing the mainframe systems 105 or distributed systems 110 transmits a structured or unstructured query regarding a single business to the blended search engine platform 120. The query may be a single, real-time query from the third party. The query may include a set of fields to be used in the query such that the user submits data in one or more of the fields. In one example, the query may include Business Name, Business Address, and Business Zip Code. For example, the user may submit a business name (for example, State Farm), and an address (for example, 123 Main St., Suite 200). In another example, the user may only submit a street name (for example, Main St.). The query may also be a single field or an unstructured query where the user can submit whatever requests it wants. In one example, a user may submit a query of: “State Farm, Clovis, New Mexico, USA”.


At (2), the blended search engine platform 120 determines if the query is structured or unstructured. In the first example above, the blended search engine platform 120 determines the query to be structured. In the second example, blended search engine platform 120 determines the query to be unstructured using the submitted request.


At (3), the blended search engine platform 120 processes the query with the appropriate API. In the first example above, the API for structured queries 120A is used. In the second example, the API for unstructured queries 120B is used.


At (4a), the blended search engine platform 120 launches, executes or calls search and match logic application for big data 125B to search big data 140, and at 4(b), the blended search engine platform 120 also launches search and match logic application for mainframe data 125A to search mainframe data 130.


At (5a) the blended search engine platform 120 receives search results from big data 140, and at 5(b), the blended search engine platform 120 receives search results from mainframe data 130.


At (6), the blended search engine platform 120 processes the search results received to determine query results for output to the third party. In other embodiments, the search results may be returned soon after received without combining with other results. The search results may need to be processed by the appropriate API for proper formatting.


At (7), the blended search engine platform 120 transmits the query results to the third party system, or makes them available to the third party system.


It is recognized that other processing may be performed and/or one or more processing steps may be omitted.


B. Batch Query



FIG. 2B illustrates an embodiment of information flow for a batch query from a mainframe system, distributed system, or other system. The information flow includes the mainframe, distributed or other systems 105 and/or 110, the mainframe data 130 and the big data 140, as well as the blended search engine platform 120.


As illustrated in FIG. 2B, at (1), a third party accessing the mainframe systems 105 or distributed systems 110 transmits a batch query in structured or unstructured form including inquiries regarding several businesses. The query may include a set of fields to be used in the query such that the user submits data in one or more of the fields. In one example, the query may include Business Name, Business Address, and Business Zip Code. For example, the user may submit a set of business names, and addresses. In another example, the user may only submit a set of street names. The query may also be a single field or an unstructured query where the user can submit whatever requests it wants. In one example, a user may submit a set of queries in the form of: “business name, city, state, USA”. In various embodiments, the batch query may be a file in an Apache Avro™ format, in comma-separated values (CSV) format, or any other format.


At (2), the blended search engine platform 120 determines if the query is structured or unstructured. In the first example above, the blended search engine platform 120 determines the query to be structured. In the second example, blended search engine platform 120 determines the query to be unstructured using the submitted request.


At (3), the blended search engine platform 120 processes the query with the appropriate API. In the first example above, the API for structured queries 120A is used. In the second example, the API for unstructured queries 120B is used.


At (4a), the blended search engine platform 120 launches search and match logic application for big data 125B to search big data 140. Since the query was in batch form, the third party is likely inquiring about more than one business. The search on the big data may find certain businesses, but certain other businesses may not be found.


If necessary, that is if there are a subset of businesses for which no results are found on big data, at 4(b), the blended search engine platform launches, executes, or calls search and match logic application for mainframe data 125A to search mainframe data 130. It is recognized that other rules may be used. For example, mainframe and big data may be searched in parallel, or mainframe may be searched first, then big data.


At (5a) the blended search engine platform 120 receives search results from big data 140, and at 5(b), the blended search engine platform 120 receives search results from mainframe data 130.


At (6), the blended search engine platform 120 processes all search results received to determine query results for output to the third party. In other embodiments, the search results may be returned soon after received without combining with other results. The search results may need to be processed by the appropriate API for proper formatting.


At (7), the blended search engine platform 120 transmits the query results to the third party system, or makes them available to the third party system.


It is recognized that other processing may be performed and/or one or more processing steps may be omitted.


C. Porting of Mainframe Data



FIG. 2C illustrates an embodiment of information flow for porting mainframe data available on a big data environment. The information flow includes the mainframe data 130, the big data 140 and the scheduler 135.


As illustrated in FIG. 2C, at (1), an indexing cluster on the big data environment 140 receives data in files from the mainframe data 130. The files may include batches received on a periodic basis (such as for example, monthly, weekly, daily, hourly, and so forth, or in real-time), as well as incremental files or updates to the files received on a periodic basis.


At (2), the indexing cluster incrementally processes the data received.


At (3), the indexing cluster denormalizes the data (both the batched data, and/or the incremental data).


At (4), the indexing cluster indexes the processed and denormalized data.


At (5), the indexing cluster transmits an indexed copy of the data to the serving cluster. This transmitting may be performed via the scheduler 135 illustrated in FIG. 1.


It is recognized that other processing may be performed and/or one or more processing steps may be omitted.


V. Search and Match Application for Big Data


FIGS. 3A and 3B are block diagrams illustrating embodiments of a search and match application for big data. It is recognized these are examples, and that other applications may also be used.



FIG. 3A is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of the search and match application for big data 125B without a query being initiated. As shown in FIG. 3A, the search and match application for big data 125B includes an interface 158 to communicate with the API interfaces 120A and 120B illustrated in FIG. 1. This interface 158 may be used receive structured and unstructured queries, and to return output results for transmission back to the third party.


The search and application for big data 125B also includes a search manager 159. The search manager may perform partitioning, as well as applying the logic for performing searching and matching on the big data.


A partition may include a logical chunk of a large distributed data set. The partitioning function may help parallelize distributed data processing with minimal network traffic for sending data between the search execution units. In general, smaller/more numerous partitions allow work to be distributed among more processing nodes, but larger/fewer partitions allow work to be done in larger chunks, which may result in the work getting done more quickly as long as all processing nodes are being utilized, due to reduced overhead. Increasing partitions count will make each partition to have less data (or not at all).



FIG. 3B is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of the search and match application for big data 125B with a query being initiated. As shown in FIG. 3B, search partitions 150A through 150N are initiated following a query being received. N is a number between 0 and about X, depending on the size of the file (or the number of records) received as the batch query (or data to ingest). For example, X may be any 10, 20, 50, 100, 250, and so forth.


Each of the search partitions 150A through 150N includes an address parser 151, a query builder 152, a query trigger 153, a parallel query execution module 154, a candidate collector 155, a candidate scorer 156, and a candidate selector 157. The function of each of these modules is described in further detail below in reference to FIG. 4.


VI. Data Architecture Processes


FIGS. 4, 5 and 6 are flowcharts illustrating various embodiments of processes that execute within the data architecture disclosed herein. In some embodiments, the processes illustrated in FIGS. 4 and 5 are performed by the blended search engine platform 120 and/or other components of the data architecture. In some embodiments, the process illustrated in FIG. 6 is performed by the scheduler 135 and big data 140 and/or other components of the data architecture. However, it is recognized that other components of other systems (not shown) may perform one or more of the processes. For ease of explanation, the following describes the processes as performed by the blended search engine platform 120, the scheduler 135 and big data 140. The example scenarios are intended to illustrate, but not to limit, various aspects of the computing environment. In some embodiments, the processes can vary from the illustrated flowcharts, with some blocks omitted and other added.


A. Process for Serving a Batch Search Query on Big Data



FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process for serving a batch search query on big data.


In block 401, the blended search engine platform 120 receives or accesses a batch inquiry file. In various embodiments, the file may be an Apache Avro™ format, in comma-separated values (CSV) format, or any other format.


In block 402, the blended search engine platform 120 determines a number of partitions needed to process the inquiry file received, and, as necessary, initiates or instantiates the appropriate number of partitions. As described above, the number of partitions may depend on the size of the inquiry file (or the number of records) received as the batch query (or data to ingest) and/or the processing capacity of each partition.


For each of the partitions initiated, the process performs blocks 403 through 410. The parallel query execution module 154 within each partition 150 ensures that the partitions are also being performed in parallel.


In block 403, the address parser 151 parses the inquiry file received to identify addresses within the data set.


In block 404, the query builder 152 builds a query based on the data received in the inquiry.


In block 405, the query trigger 153 triggers a query on the big data.


In block 406, the candidate collector 155 collects the hits (which may include matches, near-matches, or data results) found on big data based on the query triggered by the specific partition.


In block 407, the candidate scorer 156 scores each candidate collected in order to determine whether to include in output file.


In block 408, the candidate selector 157 determines which candidates to select for output, depending on the different levels defined or assigned by the third party. The levels may include closeness levels, confidence levels, or other criteria that reflects the quality of the results.


At block 409, the partition 150 determines if candidates were found for all queries triggered. If yes, in block 411A, the candidates are output to an inquiry file 1, or otherwise made available. If no, at block 410 the query is flagged for mainframe search, and at block 411B a file including all flagged queries from all partitions is output to interface 158 to communicate with the search and match application for mainframe data 125A. It is understood that in other embodiments, other rules can be used.


B. Process for Serving a Batch Search Query on Mainframe Data



FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process for serving a batch search query on mainframe data.


In some embodiments, the example process for serving a search query on mainframe data illustrated in FIG. 5 may be performed after the example process for serving a search query on big data illustrated in FIG. 4 is performed.


In block 501, the search and match application for mainframe data 125A receives the file or data set including the list of flagged queries from interface 158.


In block 502, the search and match application for mainframe data 125A initiates a search on the mainframe database for the queries in the list received.


At decision block 503, the search and match application for mainframe data 125A determines if there are candidates found in the mainframe data. If candidates are not found, at block 504, new business identifiers are created for the businesses in the list, and the new business identifiers are output to inquiry file at block 505, the inquiry file may also include the candidates found in the mainframe database.


C. Process for Transmitting Mainframe Data to Big Data



FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process for transmitting mainframe data to big data. In some embodiments, the process illustrated in FIG. 6 is performed by the scheduler 135 and components of big data 140 and/or other components of the data architecture. In some embodiments, the big data 140 system includes an indexing cluster and a serving cluster. A computer cluster may include a set of loosely or tightly connected computers that work together so that, in many respects, they can be viewed as a single system. Computer clusters may have each node configured to perform the same task, controlled and scheduled by software.


The components of a cluster may be connected to, or in electronic communication with each other through fast local area networks (LAN), with each node (computer used as a server) running its own instance of an operating system. Clusters may be deployed to improve performance and availability over that of a single computer, while being much more cost-effective than single computers of comparable speed or availability.


The indexing and serving clusters may be used in order to efficiently process searches on big data. The transmission of data from mainframe to big data is performed on an indexing cluster which is separate from a serving cluster used to process the searches. A scheduler 135, such as for example IBM Tivoli Workload Scheduler, may be used to schedule the transmission of data from the indexing cluster to the serving cluster with reduced interruptions to the performance of search and matching on the serving cluster.


At block 601, an indexing cluster on the big data environment 140 receives or accesses data in files from the mainframe data 130. The files may include batches received on a monthly basis, as well as incremental files or updates to the files received on a daily basis.


At block 602, the indexing cluster incrementally processes the data received.


At block 603, the indexing cluster denormalizes the data. The denormalizing includes both the batches of data received on a periodic basis, as well as the incremental files received on a periodic basis.


At block 604, the indexing cluster indexes the processed and denormalized data.


At block 605, the indexing cluster transmits an indexed copy of the data to the serving cluster. This transmitting may be performed via the scheduler 135 illustrated in FIG. 1.


VII. Example System Implementation And Architecture

In some embodiments, any of the systems, servers, or components referenced herein including the blended search engine platform may take the form of a computing system as shown in FIG. 7 which illustrates a block diagram of an embodiment of a computing device 700. The computing device 700 may include, for example, one or more personal computers that is IBM, Macintosh, or Linux/Unix compatible or a server or workstation. In one embodiment, the computing device 700 comprises a server, a laptop computer, a smart phone, a personal digital assistant, a tablet, or a desktop computer, for example. In one embodiment, the illustrated computing device 700 includes one or more central processing unit (CPU) 702, which may each include a conventional or proprietary microprocessor. The computing device 700 further includes one or more memory 706, such as random access memory (RAM) for temporary storage of information, one or more read only memory (ROM) for permanent storage of information, and one or more mass storage device 710, such as a hard drive, diskette, solid state drive, or optical media storage device. The computing device 700 may also include a search module 708 which performs one or more of the processed discussed herein. Typically, the components of the computing device 700 are connected to the computer using a standard based bus system. In different embodiments, the standard based bus system could be implemented in Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI), Microchannel, Small Computer System Interface (SCSI), Industrial Standard Architecture (ISA) and Extended ISA (EISA) architectures, for example. In addition, the functionality provided for in the components and modules of computing device 700 may be combined into fewer components and modules or further separated into additional components and modules.


The computing device 700 is generally controlled and coordinated by operating system software, such as Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 10, Windows Server, Unix, Linux, SunOS, Solaris, Blackberry OS, or other compatible operating systems. In Macintosh systems, the operating system may be any available operating system, such as iOS or MAC OS X. In other embodiments, the computing device 700 may be controlled by a proprietary operating system. Conventional operating systems control and schedule computer processes for execution, perform memory management, provide file system, networking, I/O services, and provide a user interface, such as a graphical user interface (GUI), among other things.


The illustrated computing device 700 may include one or more commonly available input/output (I/O) devices and interfaces 704, such as a keyboard, mouse, touchpad, and printer. In one embodiment, the I/O devices and interfaces 704 include one or more display devices, such as a monitor, that allows the visual presentation of data to a user. More particularly, a display device provides for the presentation of GUIs, application software data, reports, benchmarking data, metrics, and/or multimedia presentations, for example. The computing device 700 may also include one or more multimedia devices 712, such as speakers, video cards, graphics accelerators, and microphones, for example.


In the embodiment of FIG. 7, the I/O devices and interfaces 704 provide a communication interface to various external devices. In the embodiment of FIG. 7, the computing device 700 is electronically coupled to one or more networks, which comprise one or more of a LAN, WAN, and/or the Internet, for example, via a wired, wireless, or combination of wired and wireless, communication link. The networks communicate with various computing devices and/or other electronic devices via wired or wireless communication links, such as the ERP data sources.


In some embodiments, information may be provided to the computing device 700 over a network from one or more data sources. The data sources may include one or more internal and/or external data sources. In some embodiments, one or more of the databases or data sources may be implemented using a relational database, such as Sybase, Oracle, CodeBase, PostgreSQL, and Microsoft® SQL Server as well as other types of databases such as, for example, a flat file database, an entity-relationship database, an object-oriented database, a non-relational database, and/or a record-based database.


In general, the word “module,” as used herein, refers to logic embodied in hardware or firmware, or to a collection of software instructions, possibly having entry and exit points, written in a programming language, such as, for example, Java, Lua, C, C#, or C++. A software module may be compiled and linked into an executable program, installed in a dynamic link library, or may be written in an interpreted programming language such as, for example, BASIC, Perl, or Python. It will be appreciated that software modules may be callable from other modules or from themselves, and/or may be invoked in response to detected events or interrupts. Software modules configured for execution on computing devices may be provided on a computer readable medium, such as a compact disc, digital video disc, flash drive, or any other tangible medium. Such software code may be stored, partially or fully, on a memory device of the executing computing device, such as the computing device 700, for execution by the computing device. Software instructions may be embedded in firmware, such as an EPROM. It will be further appreciated that hardware modules may be comprised of connected logic units, such as gates and flip-flops, and/or may be comprised of programmable units, such as programmable gate arrays or processors. The modules described herein are preferably implemented as software modules, but may be represented in hardware or firmware. Generally, the modules described herein refer to logical modules that may be combined with other modules or divided into sub-modules despite their physical organization or storage.


In the example of FIG. 7, the search module 708 may be configured for execution by the CPU 702 to perform any or all of the processes discussed herein. Depending on the embodiment, certain processes, or in the processes, or groups of processes discussed herein may be performed by multiple devices, such as multiple computing systems similar to computing device 700.


VIII. Additional Embodiments

Each of the processes, methods, and algorithms described in the preceding sections may be embodied in, and fully or partially automated by, code modules executed by one or more computer systems or computer processors comprising computer hardware. The code modules may be stored on any type of non-transitory computer-readable medium or computer storage device, such as hard drives, solid state memory, optical disc, and/or the like. The systems and modules may also be transmitted as generated data signals (for example, as part of a carrier wave or other analog or digital propagated signal) on a variety of computer-readable transmission mediums, including wireless-based and wired/cable-based mediums, and may take a variety of forms (for example, as part of a single or multiplexed analog signal, or as multiple discrete digital packets or frames). The processes and algorithms may be implemented partially or wholly in application-specific circuitry. The results of the disclosed processes and process steps may be stored, persistently or otherwise, in any type of non-transitory computer storage such as, for example, volatile or non-volatile storage.


The various features and processes described above may be used independently of one another, or may be combined in various ways. All possible combinations and sub-combinations are intended to fall within the scope of this disclosure. In addition, certain method or process blocks may be omitted in some implementations. The methods and processes described herein are also not limited to any particular sequence, and the blocks or states relating thereto can be performed in other sequences that are appropriate. For example, described blocks or states may be performed in an order other than that specifically disclosed, or multiple blocks or states may be combined in a single block or state. The example blocks or states may be performed in serial, in parallel, or in some other manner. Blocks or states may be added to or removed from the disclosed example embodiments. The example systems and components described herein may be configured differently than described. For example, elements may be added to, removed from, or rearranged compared to the disclosed example embodiments.


Conditional language, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.


As used herein, the terms “determine” or “determining” encompass a wide variety of actions. For example, “determining” may include calculating, computing, processing, deriving, generating, obtaining, looking up (for example, looking up in a table, a database or another data structure), ascertaining and the like via a hardware element without user intervention. Also, “determining” may include receiving (for example, receiving information), accessing (for example, accessing data in a memory) and the like via a hardware element without user intervention. Also, “determining” may include resolving, selecting, choosing, establishing, and the like via a hardware element without user intervention.


As used herein, the terms “provide” or “providing” encompass a wide variety of actions. For example, “providing” may include storing a value in a location of a storage device for subsequent retrieval, transmitting a value directly to the recipient via at least one wired or wireless communication medium, transmitting or storing a reference to a value, and the like. “Providing” may also include encoding, decoding, encrypting, decrypting, validating, verifying, and the like via a hardware element.


As used herein, the term “message” encompasses a wide variety of formats for communicating (for example, transmitting or receiving) information. A message may include a machine readable aggregation of information such as an XML document, fixed field message, comma separated message, or the like. A message may, in some implementations, include a signal utilized to transmit one or more representations of the information. While recited in the singular, it will be understood that a message may be composed, transmitted, stored, received, etc. in multiple parts.


As used herein “receive” or “receiving” may include specific algorithms for obtaining information. For example, receiving may include transmitting a request message for the information. The request message may be transmitted via a network as described above. The request message may be transmitted according to one or more well-defined, machine readable standards which are known in the art. The request message may be stateful in which case the requesting device and the device to which the request was transmitted maintain a state between requests. The request message may be a stateless request in which case the state information for the request is contained within the messages exchanged between the requesting device and the device serving the request. One example of such state information includes a unique token that can be generated by either the requesting or serving device and included in messages exchanged. For example, the response message may include the state information to indicate what request message caused the serving device to transmit the response message.


As used herein “generate” or “generating” may include specific algorithms for creating information based on or using other input information. Generating may include retrieving the input information such as from memory or as provided input parameters to the hardware performing the generating. After obtaining, the generating may include combining the input information. The combination may be performed through specific circuitry configured to provide an output indicating the result of the generating. The combination may be dynamically performed such as through dynamic selection of execution paths based on, for example, the input information, device operational characteristics (for example, hardware resources available, power level, power source, memory levels, network connectivity, bandwidth, and the like). Generating may also include storing the generated information in a memory location. The memory location may be identified as part of the request message that initiates the generating. In some implementations, the generating may return location information identifying where the generated information can be accessed. The location information may include a memory location, network locate, file system location, or the like.


As used herein, “activate” or “activating” may refer to causing or triggering a mechanical, electronic, or electro-mechanical state change to a device. Activation of a device may cause the device, or a feature associated therewith, to change from a first state to a second state. In some implementations, activation may include changing a characteristic from a first state to a second state such as, for example, changing the viewing state of a lens of stereoscopic viewing glasses. Activating may include generating a control message indicating the desired state change and providing the control message to the device to cause the device to change state.


Any process descriptions, elements, or blocks in the flow diagrams described herein and/or depicted in the attached figures should be understood as potentially representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process. Alternate implementations are included within the scope of the embodiments described herein in which elements or functions may be deleted, executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those skilled in the art.


All of the methods and processes described above may be embodied in, and partially or fully automated via, software code modules executed by one or more general purpose computers. For example, the methods described herein may be performed by the computing system and/or any other suitable computing device. The methods may be executed on the computing devices in response to execution of software instructions or other executable code read from a tangible computer readable medium. A tangible computer readable medium is a data storage device that can store data that is readable by a computer system. Examples of computer readable mediums include read-only memory, random-access memory, other volatile or non-volatile memory devices, CD-ROMs, magnetic tape, flash drives, and optical data storage devices.


It should be emphasized that many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments, the elements of which are to be understood as being among other acceptable examples. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure. The foregoing description details certain embodiments. It will be appreciated, however, that no matter how detailed the foregoing appears in text, the systems and methods can be practiced in many ways. As is also stated above, it should be noted that the use of particular terminology when describing certain features or aspects of the systems and methods should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being re-defined herein to be restricted to including any specific characteristics of the features or aspects of the systems and methods with which that terminology is associated.

Claims
  • 1. A system comprising: a relational data scheme storing a first repository of a first set of data records, wherein each record is associated with a unique identifier;a non-relational data scheme storing a second repository of a second set of data records, wherein each record is associated with a unique identifier, and wherein the second repository further includes a subset of data records associated with a subset of records in the first set of data records; anda search and match computing system configured to receive electronic communications with a plurality of third party computing systems, the search and match computing system comprising: a first application programming interface configured to receive structured queries;a second application programming interface configured to receive unstructured queries;a first search and match application configured to communicate with the first application programming interface and the second application programming interface and execute inquiries on the relational data scheme; anda second search and match application configured to communicate with the first application programming interface and the second application programming interface and execute inquiries on the non-relational data scheme;wherein the search and match computing system further comprises instructions, that when executed by the search and match computing system, are configured to: access, from one of the plurality of third party computing systems, a query regarding at least one entity;determine if a query type of the query is a structured query or an unstructured query;process the query with the first application programming interface when the query type is determined to be the structured query or the second application programming interface when the query type is determined to be the unstructured query;initiate the second search and match application configured to execute inquiries on the non-relational data scheme;access first search results from the non-relational data scheme;determine that the first search results accessed from the non-relational data scheme do not include complete information regarding the at least one entity associated with the query;initiate the first search and match application configured to execute inquiries on the relational data scheme as to the at least one entity;access second search results from the relational data scheme; andprocess at least the second search results to generate an output for access by the one of the plurality of third party computing systems.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of third party computing systems comprises one or more mainframe systems.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of third party computing systems comprises one or more distributed systems.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the first set of data records and the second set of data records include records associated with business entities.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the second search and match application configured to execute inquiries on the non-relational data scheme comprises a search manager module configured to generate a plurality of partition tasks and to implement search logic replicated for each of the plurality of partition tasks.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the system further comprises a scheduler, and the non-relational data scheme comprises an indexing cluster and a serving cluster, wherein the indexing cluster of the non-relational data scheme is configured to: receive data records from the relational data scheme;incrementally process the data records;denormalize the data records; andindex the data records;wherein the scheduler is configured to transmit the indexed data records to the serving cluster on a periodic basis.
  • 7. The system of claim 6, wherein the indexing cluster of the non-relational data scheme is configured to receive data records from the relational data scheme on a monthly basis, on a daily basis, or on a real-time basis.
  • 8. A computer-implemented method for providing entity information, the computer-implemented method comprising, as implemented by one or more computing devices within a search and match computing system in electronic communication with a plurality of third party computing systems, the search and match computing system configured with specific executable instructions: receiving, from one of a plurality of third party computing systems, a query associated with at least one entity;determining if a query type of the query is a structured query or an unstructured query;processing the query with a first application programming interface configured to receive structured queries when the query type is determined to be the structured query or a second application programming interface configured to receive unstructured queries when the query type is determined to be the unstructured query;initiating a non-relational data search and match application configured to execute inquiries on a non-relational data scheme and to communicate with the first application programming interface and the second application programming interface, where the non-relational data scheme stores a second set of data;accessing non-relational data search results;determining that the non-relational data search results received from the non-relational data scheme do not include complete information regarding the at least one entity associated with the query;initiating a relational data search and match application configured to execute inquiries on a relational data scheme as to the at least one entity and to communicate with the first application programming interface and the second application programming interface, where the relational data scheme stores a first set of data;accessing relational data search results; andprocessing at least the relational data search results to generate an output for access by the one of the plurality of third party computing systems.
  • 9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8, wherein the one of the plurality of third party computing systems comprises at least one of a mainframe system or a distributed system.
  • 10. The computer-implemented method of claim 8, wherein the first set of data and the second set of data include records associated with business entities.
  • 11. The computer-implemented method of claim 8, wherein the non-relational data search and match application comprises a search manager module configured to generate a plurality of partition tasks and to implement search logic replicated for each of the plurality of partition tasks.
  • 12. The computer-implemented method of claim 8, wherein the non-relational data scheme comprises an indexing cluster and a serving cluster, wherein the indexing cluster of the non-relational data scheme is configured to: receive data records from the relational data scheme;incrementally process the data records;denormalize the data records; andindex the data records.
  • 13. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein the indexing cluster is in communication with a scheduler configured to transmit the indexed data records to the serving cluster on a periodic basis.
  • 14. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein the indexing cluster of the non-relational data scheme is configured to receive data records from the relational data scheme on a monthly basis, on a daily basis, or on a real-time basis.
  • 15. A non-transitory computer storage medium storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to at least: receive, from one of a plurality of third party computing systems, a query associated with at least one entity;determine if a query type of the query is a structured query or an unstructured query;process the query with a first application programming interface configured to receive structured queries when the query type is determined to be the structured query or a second application programming interface configured to receive unstructured queries when the query type is determined to be the unstructured query;initiate a non-relational data search and match application configured to execute inquiries on a non-relational data scheme and to communicate with the first application programming interface and the second application programming interface, where the non-relational data scheme stores a second set of data;receive non-relational data search results;determine that the non-relational data search results received from the non-relational data scheme do not include complete information regarding the at least one entity associated with the query;initiate a relational data search and match application configured to execute inquiries on a relational data scheme as to the at least one entity and to communicate with the first application programming interface and the second application programming interface, where the relational data scheme stores a first set of data;receive relational data search results; andprocess at least the relational data search results to generate an output for access by the one of the plurality of third party computing systems.
  • 16. The non-transitory computer storage medium of claim 15, wherein the one of the plurality of third party computing systems comprises at least one of: a mainframe system or a distributed system.
  • 17. The non-transitory computer storage medium of claim 15, wherein the first set of data and the second set of data include records associated with business entities.
  • 18. The non-transitory computer storage medium of claim 15, wherein the non-relational data search and match comprises a search manager module configured to generate a plurality of partition tasks and to implement search logic replicated for each of the plurality of partition tasks.
  • 19. The non-transitory computer storage medium of claim 15, wherein the non-relational data scheme comprises an indexing cluster and a serving cluster, wherein the indexing cluster of the non-relational data scheme is configured to: receive data records from the relational data scheme;incrementally process the data records;denormalize the data records; andindex the data records;wherein the indexing cluster is in communication with a scheduler configured to transmit the indexed data records to the serving cluster on a periodic basis.
  • 20. The non-transitory computer storage medium of claim 19, wherein the indexing cluster of the non-relational data scheme is configured to receive data records from the relational data scheme on a monthly basis, on a daily basis, or on a real-time basis.
RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/124,989, filed Sep. 7, 2018, titled “Data Architecture for Supporting Multiple Search Models;” the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (994)
Number Name Date Kind
4163290 Sutherlin et al. Jul 1979 A
4827508 Shear May 1989 A
4868570 Davis Sep 1989 A
4935870 Burk, Jr. et al. Jun 1990 A
4989141 Lyons et al. Jan 1991 A
5216612 Cornett et al. Jun 1993 A
5247575 Sprague et al. Sep 1993 A
5274547 Zoffel et al. Dec 1993 A
5325509 Lautzenheiser Jun 1994 A
5341429 Stringer et al. Aug 1994 A
5528701 Aref Jun 1996 A
5555409 Leenstra, Sr. et al. Sep 1996 A
5590038 Pitroda Dec 1996 A
5621201 Langhans et al. Apr 1997 A
5629982 Micali May 1997 A
5630070 Dietrich et al. May 1997 A
5640551 Chu et al. Jun 1997 A
5640577 Scharmer Jun 1997 A
5655129 Ito Aug 1997 A
5659731 Gustafson Aug 1997 A
5666528 Thai Sep 1997 A
5692107 Simoudis et al. Nov 1997 A
5737732 Gibson et al. Apr 1998 A
5739512 Tognazzini Apr 1998 A
5748098 Grace May 1998 A
5754632 Smith May 1998 A
5754939 Herz et al. May 1998 A
5765143 Sheldon et al. Jun 1998 A
5768423 Aref et al. Jun 1998 A
5774692 Boyer et al. Jun 1998 A
5778405 Ogawa Jul 1998 A
5797136 Boyer et al. Aug 1998 A
5812840 Shwartz Sep 1998 A
5822750 Jou et al. Oct 1998 A
5822751 Gray et al. Oct 1998 A
5825884 Zdepski et al. Oct 1998 A
5828837 Eikland Oct 1998 A
5832068 Smith Nov 1998 A
5835915 Carr et al. Nov 1998 A
5842185 Chancey et al. Nov 1998 A
5844218 Kawan et al. Dec 1998 A
5881131 Farris et al. Mar 1999 A
5893090 Friedman et al. Apr 1999 A
5905985 Malloy et al. May 1999 A
5956693 Geerlings Sep 1999 A
5961593 Gabber et al. Oct 1999 A
5963932 Jakobsson et al. Oct 1999 A
5966695 Melchione et al. Oct 1999 A
6014688 Venkatraman et al. Jan 2000 A
6026381 Barton, III et al. Feb 2000 A
6038551 Barlow et al. Mar 2000 A
6070147 Harms et al. May 2000 A
6073106 Rozen et al. Jun 2000 A
6073140 Morgan et al. Jun 2000 A
6085242 Chandra Jul 2000 A
6119103 Basch et al. Sep 2000 A
6121901 Welch et al. Sep 2000 A
6128602 Northington et al. Oct 2000 A
6128624 Papierniak et al. Oct 2000 A
6144957 Cohen et al. Nov 2000 A
6151601 Papierniak et al. Nov 2000 A
6157707 Baulier et al. Dec 2000 A
6157927 Schaefer et al. Dec 2000 A
6161139 Win et al. Dec 2000 A
6173284 Brown Jan 2001 B1
6178442 Yamazaki Jan 2001 B1
6199077 Inala et al. Mar 2001 B1
6202053 Christiansen et al. Mar 2001 B1
6223171 Chaudhuri et al. Apr 2001 B1
6233588 Marchoili et al. May 2001 B1
6253202 Gilmour Jun 2001 B1
6256630 Gilai et al. Jul 2001 B1
6263334 Fayyad et al. Jul 2001 B1
6263337 Fayyad et al. Jul 2001 B1
6275824 O'Flaherty et al. Aug 2001 B1
6304869 Moore et al. Oct 2001 B1
6311169 Duhon Oct 2001 B2
6317783 Freishtat et al. Nov 2001 B1
6339769 Cochrane et al. Jan 2002 B1
6366903 Agrawal et al. Apr 2002 B1
6397197 Gindlesperger May 2002 B1
6405173 Honarvar Jun 2002 B1
6405245 Burson et al. Jun 2002 B1
6446200 Ball et al. Sep 2002 B1
6448980 Kumar et al. Sep 2002 B1
6453353 Win et al. Sep 2002 B1
6457012 Jatkowski Sep 2002 B1
6463533 Calamera et al. Oct 2002 B1
6477565 Daswani et al. Nov 2002 B1
6496819 Bello et al. Dec 2002 B1
6496931 Rajchel et al. Dec 2002 B1
6505168 Rothman et al. Jan 2003 B1
6517587 Satyavolu et al. Feb 2003 B2
6523021 Monberg et al. Feb 2003 B1
6523022 Hobbs Feb 2003 B1
6523041 Morgan et al. Feb 2003 B1
6543683 Hoffman Apr 2003 B2
6564210 Korda et al. May 2003 B1
6567850 Freishtat et al. May 2003 B1
6574623 Laung et al. Jun 2003 B1
6574736 Andrews Jun 2003 B1
6581059 Barrett et al. Jun 2003 B1
6601173 Mohler Jul 2003 B1
6601234 Bowman-Amuah Jul 2003 B1
6618727 Wheeler et al. Sep 2003 B1
6633910 Rajan et al. Oct 2003 B1
6647383 August et al. Nov 2003 B1
6651220 Penteroudakis et al. Nov 2003 B1
6658393 Basch et al. Dec 2003 B1
6665677 Wotring et al. Dec 2003 B1
6691136 Lee et al. Feb 2004 B2
6708166 Dysart et al. Mar 2004 B1
6714944 Shapiro et al. Mar 2004 B1
6725381 Smith et al. Apr 2004 B1
6725425 Rajan et al. Apr 2004 B1
6738748 Wetzer May 2004 B2
6738759 Wheeler et al. May 2004 B1
6742001 Ripley May 2004 B2
6748426 Shaffer et al. Jun 2004 B1
6750985 Rhoads Jun 2004 B2
6754665 Futagami et al. Jun 2004 B1
6766327 Morgan, Jr. et al. Jul 2004 B2
6766946 Iida et al. Jul 2004 B2
6782379 Lee Aug 2004 B2
6802042 Rangan et al. Oct 2004 B2
6804346 Mewhinney Oct 2004 B1
6804701 Muret et al. Oct 2004 B2
6816871 Lee Nov 2004 B2
6839714 Wheeler et al. Jan 2005 B2
6842782 Malik et al. Jan 2005 B1
6845448 Chaganti et al. Jan 2005 B1
6850895 Brodersen et al. Feb 2005 B2
6853997 Wotring et al. Feb 2005 B2
6865680 Wu et al. Mar 2005 B1
6871220 Rajan et al. Mar 2005 B1
6910624 Natsuno Jun 2005 B1
6928487 Eggebraaten et al. Aug 2005 B2
6934714 Meinig Aug 2005 B2
6947984 Schweitzer et al. Sep 2005 B2
6947989 Gullotta et al. Sep 2005 B2
6950858 Ogami Sep 2005 B2
6954757 Zargham et al. Oct 2005 B2
6976056 Kumar Dec 2005 B1
6983379 Spalink et al. Jan 2006 B1
6983478 Grauch et al. Jan 2006 B1
6985887 Sunstein et al. Jan 2006 B1
6985898 Ripley et al. Jan 2006 B1
6999941 Agarwal Feb 2006 B1
7003504 Angus et al. Feb 2006 B1
7013310 Messing et al. Mar 2006 B2
7016907 Boreham et al. Mar 2006 B2
7028001 Muthuswamy et al. Apr 2006 B1
7028052 Chapman et al. Apr 2006 B2
7035855 Kilger et al. Apr 2006 B1
7039176 Borodow et al. May 2006 B2
7039656 Tsai et al. May 2006 B1
7043476 Robson May 2006 B2
7047251 Reed et al. May 2006 B2
7050982 Sheinson et al. May 2006 B2
7050989 Hurt et al. May 2006 B1
7062475 Szabo et al. Jun 2006 B1
7069240 Spero et al. Jun 2006 B2
7075894 Hein et al. Jul 2006 B2
7076475 Honarvar et al. Jul 2006 B2
7082435 Guzman et al. Jul 2006 B1
7085997 Wu et al. Aug 2006 B1
7092898 Mattick et al. Aug 2006 B1
7117172 Black Oct 2006 B1
7124144 Christianson et al. Oct 2006 B2
7133935 Hedy Nov 2006 B2
7155739 Bari et al. Dec 2006 B2
7167907 Shaffer et al. Jan 2007 B2
7178096 Rangan et al. Feb 2007 B2
7184974 Shishido Feb 2007 B2
7185016 Rasmussen Feb 2007 B1
7188107 Moon et al. Mar 2007 B2
7188252 Dunn Mar 2007 B1
7200602 Jonas Apr 2007 B2
7219107 Beringer May 2007 B2
7221377 Okita et al. May 2007 B1
7222369 Vering et al. May 2007 B2
7234160 Vogel et al. Jun 2007 B2
7240059 Bayliss et al. Jul 2007 B2
7243369 Bhat et al. Jul 2007 B2
7246067 Austin et al. Jul 2007 B2
7249048 O'Flaherty Jul 2007 B1
7249072 Nearhood et al. Jul 2007 B1
7263548 Daswani et al. Aug 2007 B2
7272591 Ghazal et al. Sep 2007 B1
7277900 Ganesh et al. Oct 2007 B1
7283998 Moon et al. Oct 2007 B2
7315837 Sloan et al. Jan 2008 B2
7328233 Salim et al. Feb 2008 B2
7340679 Botscheck et al. Mar 2008 B2
7346703 Cope Mar 2008 B2
7366694 Lazerson Apr 2008 B2
7367011 Ramsey et al. Apr 2008 B2
7370044 Mulhern et al. May 2008 B2
7373335 Cleghorn et al. May 2008 B2
7376603 Mayr et al. May 2008 B1
7379880 Pathria et al. May 2008 B1
7383215 Navarro et al. Jun 2008 B1
7383988 Slonecker, Jr. Jun 2008 B2
7386554 Ripley et al. Jun 2008 B2
7389305 Kindig et al. Jun 2008 B1
7395273 Khan et al. Jul 2008 B2
7403942 Bayliss Jul 2008 B1
7421322 Silversmith et al. Sep 2008 B1
7421442 Gelb et al. Sep 2008 B2
7424439 Fayyad et al. Sep 2008 B1
7424520 Daswani et al. Sep 2008 B2
7433864 Malik Oct 2008 B2
7451113 Kasower Nov 2008 B1
7460857 Roach, Jr. Dec 2008 B2
7467127 Baccash et al. Dec 2008 B1
7467401 Cicchitto Dec 2008 B2
7475118 Leiba et al. Jan 2009 B2
7478157 Bohrer et al. Jan 2009 B2
7483842 Fung et al. Jan 2009 B1
7490356 Lieblich et al. Feb 2009 B2
7505938 Lang et al. Mar 2009 B2
7529698 Joao May 2009 B2
7533179 Tarquini et al. May 2009 B2
7536346 Aliffi et al. May 2009 B2
7543739 Brown et al. Jun 2009 B2
7546266 Beirne et al. Jun 2009 B2
7546271 Chmielewski et al. Jun 2009 B1
7552089 Bruer et al. Jun 2009 B2
7552190 Freishtat et al. Jun 2009 B1
7556192 Wokaty, Jr. Jul 2009 B2
7559217 Bass Jul 2009 B2
7562093 Gelb et al. Jul 2009 B2
7562184 Henmi et al. Jul 2009 B2
7562814 Shao et al. Jul 2009 B1
7571473 Boydstun et al. Aug 2009 B1
7577934 Anonsen et al. Aug 2009 B2
7580884 Cook Aug 2009 B2
7584126 White Sep 2009 B1
7584146 Duhon Sep 2009 B1
7584197 Dant Sep 2009 B2
7587366 Grim, III et al. Sep 2009 B2
7593889 Raines et al. Sep 2009 B2
7596512 Raines et al. Sep 2009 B1
7596716 Frost et al. Sep 2009 B2
7603701 Gaucas Oct 2009 B2
7606725 Robertson et al. Oct 2009 B2
7613600 Krane Nov 2009 B2
7613671 Serrano-Morales et al. Nov 2009 B2
7634737 Beringer et al. Dec 2009 B2
7640200 Gardner et al. Dec 2009 B2
7647344 Skurtovich, Jr. et al. Jan 2010 B2
7653592 Flaxman et al. Jan 2010 B1
7653688 Bittner Jan 2010 B2
7657540 Bayliss Feb 2010 B1
7668840 Bayliss et al. Feb 2010 B2
7672833 Blume et al. Mar 2010 B2
7672879 Kumar et al. Mar 2010 B1
7672924 Scheurich et al. Mar 2010 B1
7672926 Ghazal et al. Mar 2010 B2
7676751 Allen et al. Mar 2010 B2
7685209 Norton et al. Mar 2010 B1
7689505 Kasower Mar 2010 B2
7689506 Fei et al. Mar 2010 B2
7689526 Byrnes et al. Mar 2010 B2
7698163 Reed et al. Apr 2010 B2
7698445 Fitzpatrick et al. Apr 2010 B2
7707059 Reed et al. Apr 2010 B2
7707164 Kapochunas et al. Apr 2010 B2
7707271 Rudkin et al. Apr 2010 B2
7711635 Steele et al. May 2010 B2
7720846 Bayliss May 2010 B1
7730078 Schwabe et al. Jun 2010 B2
7739139 Robertson et al. Jun 2010 B2
7742982 Chaudhuri et al. Jun 2010 B2
7747480 Agresta et al. Jun 2010 B1
7747559 Leitner et al. Jun 2010 B2
7752236 Williams et al. Jul 2010 B2
7752535 Satyavolu Jul 2010 B2
7756789 Welker et al. Jul 2010 B2
7765166 Beringer et al. Jul 2010 B2
7765279 Kaib et al. Jul 2010 B1
7765311 Itabashi et al. Jul 2010 B2
7769696 Yoda Aug 2010 B2
7769998 Lynch et al. Aug 2010 B2
7774270 MacCloskey Aug 2010 B1
7783515 Kumar et al. Aug 2010 B1
7788040 Haskell et al. Aug 2010 B2
7797252 Rosskamm et al. Sep 2010 B2
7797725 Lunt et al. Sep 2010 B2
7801812 Conlin et al. Sep 2010 B2
7801956 Cumberbatch et al. Sep 2010 B1
7810036 Bales et al. Oct 2010 B2
7814005 Imrey et al. Oct 2010 B2
7818228 Coulter Oct 2010 B1
7818229 Imrey et al. Oct 2010 B2
7818231 Rajan Oct 2010 B2
7830382 Cirit et al. Nov 2010 B2
7832006 Chen et al. Nov 2010 B2
7836111 Shan Nov 2010 B1
7841008 Cole et al. Nov 2010 B1
7844604 Baio et al. Nov 2010 B2
7853518 Cagan Dec 2010 B2
7870151 Mayer et al. Jan 2011 B2
7873677 Messing et al. Jan 2011 B2
7877304 Coulter Jan 2011 B1
7895139 Sullivan et al. Feb 2011 B2
7908242 Achanta Mar 2011 B1
7912842 Bayliss et al. Mar 2011 B1
7912865 Akerman et al. Mar 2011 B2
7930242 Morris et al. Apr 2011 B2
7958126 Schachter Jun 2011 B2
7975299 Balducci et al. Jul 2011 B1
7983932 Kane Jul 2011 B2
7991688 Phelan et al. Aug 2011 B2
7991901 Tarquini et al. Aug 2011 B2
7996912 Spalink et al. Aug 2011 B2
8001153 Skurtovich, Jr. et al. Aug 2011 B2
8001235 Russ et al. Aug 2011 B2
8005759 Hirtenstein et al. Aug 2011 B2
8015614 Matsuzaki et al. Sep 2011 B2
8019843 Cash et al. Sep 2011 B2
8024264 Chaudhuri et al. Sep 2011 B2
8024778 Cash et al. Sep 2011 B2
8060423 Rukonic et al. Nov 2011 B1
8060424 Kasower Nov 2011 B2
8060502 Churi et al. Nov 2011 B2
8060541 Dant Nov 2011 B2
8064586 Shaffer et al. Nov 2011 B2
8065233 Lee et al. Nov 2011 B2
8065264 Achanta Nov 2011 B1
8095458 Peterson et al. Jan 2012 B2
8099341 Varghese Jan 2012 B2
8104679 Brown Jan 2012 B2
8127986 Taylor et al. Mar 2012 B1
8131777 McCullouch Mar 2012 B2
8160960 Fei et al. Apr 2012 B1
8161104 Tomkow Apr 2012 B2
8170998 Churi et al. May 2012 B2
8175889 Girulat et al. May 2012 B1
8180654 Berkman et al. May 2012 B2
8190629 Wu et al. May 2012 B2
8190998 Bitterlich May 2012 B2
8201257 Andres et al. Jun 2012 B1
8214238 Fairfield et al. Jul 2012 B1
8219535 Kobori et al. Jul 2012 B1
8219771 Le Neel Jul 2012 B2
8224723 Bosch et al. Jul 2012 B2
8234498 Britti et al. Jul 2012 B2
8239130 Upstill et al. Aug 2012 B1
8244635 Freishtat et al. Aug 2012 B2
8255978 Dick Aug 2012 B2
8266065 Dilip et al. Sep 2012 B2
8266168 Bayliss Sep 2012 B2
8266515 Satyavolu Sep 2012 B2
8271378 Chaudhuri et al. Sep 2012 B2
8280805 Abrahams et al. Oct 2012 B1
8285656 Chang et al. Oct 2012 B1
8296229 Yellin et al. Oct 2012 B1
8306986 Routson et al. Nov 2012 B2
8312033 McMillan Nov 2012 B1
8321339 Imrey et al. Nov 2012 B2
8321952 Spalink et al. Nov 2012 B2
8326672 Haggerty et al. Dec 2012 B2
8326725 Elwell et al. Dec 2012 B2
8340685 Cochran et al. Dec 2012 B2
8345790 Sartori et al. Jan 2013 B2
8359210 Altinger et al. Jan 2013 B1
8364518 Blake et al. Jan 2013 B1
8370371 Moncla et al. Feb 2013 B1
8380590 Rukonic et al. Feb 2013 B1
8386377 Xiong et al. Feb 2013 B1
8392334 Hirtenstein et al. Mar 2013 B2
8433512 Lopatenko et al. Apr 2013 B1
8458074 Showalter Jun 2013 B2
8463919 Tarquini et al. Jun 2013 B2
8464046 Kragh Jun 2013 B1
8468198 Tomkow Jun 2013 B2
8473354 Psota et al. Jun 2013 B2
8478674 Kapczynski et al. Jul 2013 B1
8484211 Bayliss Jul 2013 B2
8495077 Bayliss Jul 2013 B2
8495384 DeLuccia Jul 2013 B1
8498930 Chung et al. Jul 2013 B2
8504456 Griffin et al. Aug 2013 B2
8504470 Chirehdast Aug 2013 B1
8510184 Imrev et al. Aug 2013 B2
8510189 Imrey et al. Aug 2013 B2
8515828 Wolf et al. Aug 2013 B1
8515862 Zhang et al. Aug 2013 B2
8521628 Gowen et al. Aug 2013 B1
8521729 Churi et al. Aug 2013 B2
8538980 MacKenzie Sep 2013 B1
8549472 Tilwani Oct 2013 B1
8560434 Morris et al. Oct 2013 B2
8560436 Ingram et al. Oct 2013 B2
8566029 Lopatenko et al. Oct 2013 B1
8566141 Nagdev et al. Oct 2013 B1
8572083 Snell et al. Oct 2013 B1
8583593 Achanta Nov 2013 B1
8589069 Lehman Nov 2013 B1
8589208 Kruger et al. Nov 2013 B2
8600854 Mayr et al. Dec 2013 B2
8606666 Courbage et al. Dec 2013 B1
8620579 Upstill et al. Dec 2013 B1
8626618 Psota et al. Jan 2014 B2
8631242 Britti et al. Jan 2014 B2
8639616 Rolenaitis et al. Jan 2014 B1
8639920 Stack et al. Jan 2014 B2
8650407 Britti et al. Feb 2014 B2
8660943 Chirehdast Feb 2014 B1
8671115 Skurtovich, Jr. et al. Mar 2014 B2
8677129 Milana et al. Mar 2014 B2
8694390 Imrey et al. Apr 2014 B2
8694502 Bayliss Apr 2014 B2
8705718 Baniak et al. Apr 2014 B2
8706474 Blume et al. Apr 2014 B2
8725613 Celka et al. May 2014 B1
8732004 Ramos et al. May 2014 B1
8738515 Chaudhuri et al. May 2014 B2
8738516 Dean et al. May 2014 B1
8762053 Lehman Jun 2014 B1
8768826 Imrey et al. Jul 2014 B2
8768914 Scriffignano et al. Jul 2014 B2
8775299 Achanta et al. Jul 2014 B2
8781877 Kruger et al. Jul 2014 B2
8781882 Arboletti et al. Jul 2014 B1
8781953 Kasower Jul 2014 B2
8782217 Arone et al. Jul 2014 B1
8788701 Byrnes et al. Jul 2014 B1
8805805 Kobori et al. Aug 2014 B1
8818888 Kapczynski et al. Aug 2014 B1
8825544 Imrey et al. Sep 2014 B2
8862566 Leitner et al. Oct 2014 B2
8903741 Imrey et al. Dec 2014 B2
8938432 Rossmark et al. Jan 2015 B2
8949981 Trollope et al. Feb 2015 B1
8954459 McMillan et al. Feb 2015 B1
8965934 Prieditis Feb 2015 B2
8966649 Stack et al. Feb 2015 B2
8972400 Kapczynski et al. Mar 2015 B1
9057616 Lopatenko et al. Jun 2015 B1
9057617 Lopatenko et al. Jun 2015 B1
9075848 Churi et al. Jul 2015 B2
9116918 Kim Aug 2015 B1
9143541 Szamonek et al. Sep 2015 B1
9147042 Haller et al. Sep 2015 B1
9152727 Balducci et al. Oct 2015 B1
9165044 Psenka et al. Oct 2015 B2
9256624 Skurtovich, Jr. et al. Feb 2016 B2
9268803 Kapochunas et al. Feb 2016 B2
9305300 Mulhern et al. Apr 2016 B2
9324087 Routson et al. Apr 2016 B2
9342783 Chang et al. May 2016 B1
9438570 Milana et al. Sep 2016 B2
9449346 Hockey et al. Sep 2016 B1
9529851 Smith Dec 2016 B1
9535959 Sun et al. Jan 2017 B2
9553936 Dijk et al. Jan 2017 B2
9595023 Hockey et al. Mar 2017 B1
9595051 Stack et al. Mar 2017 B2
9636053 Peterson et al. May 2017 B2
9646058 Churi et al. May 2017 B2
9684905 Haller et al. Jun 2017 B1
9705863 Britti et al. Jul 2017 B2
9710523 Skurtovich, Jr. et al. Jul 2017 B2
9710852 Olson et al. Jul 2017 B1
9774681 Zoldi et al. Sep 2017 B2
9866561 Psenka et al. Jan 2018 B2
9955003 Cody et al. Apr 2018 B2
9989501 Tat et al. Jun 2018 B2
10003591 Hockey et al. Jun 2018 B2
10075446 McMillan et al. Sep 2018 B2
10102536 Hickman et al. Oct 2018 B1
10104059 Hockey et al. Oct 2018 B2
10108818 Curcio et al. Oct 2018 B2
10115102 Burrell et al. Oct 2018 B2
10117609 Peterson et al. Nov 2018 B2
10180861 Raghavan et al. Jan 2019 B2
10262362 Hu et al. Apr 2019 B1
10282790 Kolbrener May 2019 B1
10319029 Hockey et al. Jun 2019 B1
10339330 Riley et al. Jul 2019 B2
10367888 Zoldi et al. Jul 2019 B2
10380654 Hirtenstein et al. Aug 2019 B2
10437895 Chang et al. Oct 2019 B2
10503798 Chen et al. Dec 2019 B2
10515084 Sun et al. Dec 2019 B2
10523653 Hockey et al. Dec 2019 B2
10530761 Hockey et al. Jan 2020 B2
10547739 Cody et al. Jan 2020 B2
10580025 Hickman et al. Mar 2020 B2
10580724 Britti et al. Mar 2020 B2
10614463 Hockey et al. Apr 2020 B1
10691825 Jones et al. Jun 2020 B2
10693840 Peterson et al. Jun 2020 B2
10726491 Hockey et al. Jul 2020 B1
10810218 Ng et al. Oct 2020 B2
10885139 Chen et al. Jan 2021 B2
10887457 Degeorgis et al. Jan 2021 B1
10963434 Rodriguez et al. Mar 2021 B1
10979560 Cody et al. Apr 2021 B2
11042662 Riley et al. Jun 2021 B2
11107158 Hu et al. Aug 2021 B1
11157872 McMillan et al. Oct 2021 B2
11163943 Billman et al. Nov 2021 B2
11227001 Rege et al. Jan 2022 B2
11263218 Pieniazek et al. Mar 2022 B2
11270275 Anderson et al. Mar 2022 B2
11308170 Chang et al. Apr 2022 B2
11328083 Jones et al. May 2022 B2
11443316 Burrell et al. Sep 2022 B2
11461383 Xie et al. Oct 2022 B2
11468186 Dong et al. Oct 2022 B2
20010000536 Tarin Apr 2001 A1
20010014878 Mitra et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010029470 Schultz et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010029482 Tealdi et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010034631 Kiselik Oct 2001 A1
20010037332 Miller et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010039532 Coleman, Jr. et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010049274 Degraeve Dec 2001 A1
20010049620 Blasko Dec 2001 A1
20020004736 Roundtree et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020010664 Rabideau et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020010701 Kosciuszko Jan 2002 A1
20020013827 Edstrom et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020026507 Sears et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020026519 Itabashi et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020033846 Balasubramanian et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020049701 Nabe et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049738 Epstein Apr 2002 A1
20020052884 Farber et al. May 2002 A1
20020069122 Yun et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020077964 Brody et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020091650 Ellis Jul 2002 A1
20020091706 Anderson et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099628 Takaoka et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099824 Bender et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099936 Kou et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020103809 Starzl et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020103933 Garon et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020111816 Lortscher et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020111910 Walsh Aug 2002 A1
20020120757 Sutherland et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020128962 Kasower Sep 2002 A1
20020131565 Scheuring et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020133504 Vlahos et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138297 Lee Sep 2002 A1
20020138470 Zhou Sep 2002 A1
20020143943 Lee et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020147801 Gullotta et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156676 Ahrens et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161496 Yamaki Oct 2002 A1
20020161664 Shaya et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020165757 Lisser Nov 2002 A1
20020173984 Robertson et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020184255 Edd et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020188544 Wizon et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198800 Shamrakov Dec 2002 A1
20020198824 Cook Dec 2002 A1
20030002671 Inchalik et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030009418 Green et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018578 Schultz Jan 2003 A1
20030023531 Fergusson Jan 2003 A1
20030041050 Smith et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030046311 Baidya et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030050882 Degen et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030055931 Cravo De Almeida et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030069839 Whittington et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030069943 Bahrs et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030097342 Whittingtom May 2003 A1
20030097380 Mulhern et al. May 2003 A1
20030101111 Dang et al. May 2003 A1
20030101344 Wheeler et al. May 2003 A1
20030105728 Yano et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030105733 Boreham Jun 2003 A1
20030105742 Boreham et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030135451 O'Brien et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030153299 Perfit et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030158749 Olchanski et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030158776 Landesmann Aug 2003 A1
20030163513 Schaeck et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030171942 Gaito Sep 2003 A1
20030191731 Stewart et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030200151 Ellenson et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204429 Botscheck et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030208412 Hillestad et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030212654 Harper et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030229892 Sardera Dec 2003 A1
20040006488 Fitall et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040010458 Friedman Jan 2004 A1
20040019799 Vering et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040030649 Nelson et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040044673 Brady et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040052357 Logan et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040083215 de Jong Apr 2004 A1
20040083482 Makagon et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040088237 Moenickheim et al. May 2004 A1
20040088255 Zielke et al. May 2004 A1
20040098625 Lagadec et al. May 2004 A1
20040103147 Flesher et al. May 2004 A1
20040107250 Marciano Jun 2004 A1
20040111359 Hudock Jun 2004 A1
20040117358 Von Kaenel et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122696 Beringer Jun 2004 A1
20040128150 Lundegren Jul 2004 A1
20040128156 Beringer et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040128227 Whipple et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040128230 Oppenheimer et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040133509 McCoy et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040133513 McCoy et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040133515 McCoy et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040139025 Coleman Jul 2004 A1
20040141005 Banatwala et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143546 Wood et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143596 Sirkin Jul 2004 A1
20040153330 Miller et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040153448 Cheng et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040153521 Kogo Aug 2004 A1
20040176995 Fusz Sep 2004 A1
20040193538 Raines Sep 2004 A1
20040199456 Flint et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040199789 Shaw et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040204948 Singletary et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040220865 Lozowski et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040220896 Finlay et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040220918 Scriffignano et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040221043 Su et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040225099 Hohberg et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040225594 Nolan, III et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040225596 Kemper et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040225643 Alpha et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040230534 McGough Nov 2004 A1
20040243588 Tanner et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254935 Chagoly et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267714 Frid et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050005168 Dick Jan 2005 A1
20050010513 Duckworth et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050010555 Gallivan Jan 2005 A1
20050027995 Menschik et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050038737 Norris Feb 2005 A1
20050049991 Aggarwal Mar 2005 A1
20050055231 Lee Mar 2005 A1
20050060332 Bernstein et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050071328 Lawrence Mar 2005 A1
20050086261 Mammone Apr 2005 A1
20050091164 Varble Apr 2005 A1
20050097039 Kulcsar et al. May 2005 A1
20050102180 Gailey et al. May 2005 A1
20050108396 Bittner May 2005 A1
20050108631 Amorin et al. May 2005 A1
20050113991 Rogers et al. May 2005 A1
20050114335 Wesinger et al. May 2005 A1
20050114344 Wesinger et al. May 2005 A1
20050114345 Wesinger et al. May 2005 A1
20050137899 Davies et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050154664 Guy et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050154769 Eckart et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050187948 Monitzer et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050192008 Desai et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050193093 Mathew et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197953 Broadbent et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050208461 Krebs et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050226224 Lee et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050246338 Bird Nov 2005 A1
20050257250 Mitchell et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050262158 Sauermann Nov 2005 A1
20050273849 Araujo et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288998 Verma et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050289003 Thompson et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060015425 Brooks Jan 2006 A1
20060020611 Gilbert et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060032909 Seegar Feb 2006 A1
20060036543 Blagg et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036748 Nusbaum et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041670 Musseleck et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060069635 Ram et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074991 Lussier et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079211 Degraeve Apr 2006 A1
20060080233 Mendelovich et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060080251 Fried et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060085361 Hoerle et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060085454 Blegen et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060129419 Flaxer et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060136330 DeRoy et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060136595 Satyavolu Jun 2006 A1
20060149674 Cook et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060155573 Hartunian Jul 2006 A1
20060155780 Sakairi et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161554 Lucovsky et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060179050 Giang et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060184440 Britti et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060184585 Grear et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195688 Drissi et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060235935 Ng Oct 2006 A1
20060241923 Xu et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060242047 Haggerty et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060267999 Cash et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060276171 Pousti Dec 2006 A1
20060277089 Hubbard et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060277092 Williams Dec 2006 A1
20060277141 Palmer Dec 2006 A1
20060282359 Nobili et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060282429 Hernandez-Sherrington et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060282819 Graham et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060288090 Kraft Dec 2006 A1
20060293932 Cash et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060294199 Bertholf Dec 2006 A1
20070011020 Martin Jan 2007 A1
20070011030 Bregante et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070011032 Bregante et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070011083 Bird et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016517 Solomon Jan 2007 A1
20070022141 Singleton et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070027778 Schellhammer et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070030282 Cash et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070038483 Wood Feb 2007 A1
20070038497 Britti et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070047714 Baniak et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070067285 Blume et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070067437 Sindambiwe Mar 2007 A1
20070094230 Subramaniam et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070094241 M. Blackwell et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070094264 Nair Apr 2007 A1
20070112668 Celano et al. May 2007 A1
20070118393 Rosen et al. May 2007 A1
20070130070 Williams Jun 2007 A1
20070156554 Nikoley et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070156589 Zimler et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070185797 Robinson Aug 2007 A1
20070204338 Aiello et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208640 Banasiak et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070214000 Shahrabi et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070220611 Socolow et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070226010 Larsen Sep 2007 A1
20070226093 Chan et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070226129 Liao et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070244782 Chimento Oct 2007 A1
20070250441 Paulsen et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250459 Schwarz et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070261114 Pomerantsev Nov 2007 A1
20070282730 Carpenter et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070282736 Conlin et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070288360 Seeklus Dec 2007 A1
20070299759 Kelly Dec 2007 A1
20080010206 Coleman Jan 2008 A1
20080021804 Deckoff Jan 2008 A1
20080027858 Benson Jan 2008 A1
20080033742 Bernasconi Feb 2008 A1
20080033750 Burriss et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080033956 Saha et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080052244 Tsuei et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080059224 Schechter Mar 2008 A1
20080059317 Chandran et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080059449 Webster et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080072316 Chang et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080082536 Schwabe et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080109875 Kraft May 2008 A1
20080115191 Kim et al. May 2008 A1
20080120569 Mann et al. May 2008 A1
20080177655 Zalik Jul 2008 A1
20080183504 Highley Jul 2008 A1
20080183564 Tien et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080184270 Cole et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080195600 Deakter Aug 2008 A1
20080201401 Pugh et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080205655 Wilkins et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080205774 Brinker et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080208610 Thomas et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080208631 Morita et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080208735 Balet et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080208873 Boehmer Aug 2008 A1
20080216156 Kosaka Sep 2008 A1
20080244008 Wilkinson et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080249869 Angell et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080263058 Peden Oct 2008 A1
20080270209 Mauseth et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080270294 Lent et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080288283 Baldwin, Jr. et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294540 Celka et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080301016 Durvasula et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080301188 O'Hara Dec 2008 A1
20080306750 Wunder et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080312969 Raines et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080319889 Hammad Dec 2008 A1
20080320575 Gelb et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090006475 Udezue et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090018986 Alcorn et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090018996 Hunt et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024428 Hudock, Jr. Jan 2009 A1
20090024505 Patel et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090031426 Dal Lago et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090043691 Kasower Feb 2009 A1
20090048877 Binns et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090048957 Celano Feb 2009 A1
20090055894 Lorsch Feb 2009 A1
20090060343 Rosea Mar 2009 A1
20090094064 Tyler et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090094237 Churi et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090094674 Schwartz et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090106846 Dupray et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090112650 Iwane Apr 2009 A1
20090113532 Lapidous Apr 2009 A1
20090119169 Chandratillake et al. May 2009 A1
20090132347 Anderson et al. May 2009 A1
20090138335 Lieberman May 2009 A1
20090144102 Lopez Jun 2009 A1
20090150166 Leite et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090150238 Marsh et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090164232 Chmielewski et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090164380 Brown Jun 2009 A1
20090182661 Irwin Jul 2009 A1
20090183259 Rinek et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090210807 Xiao et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090216591 Buerger et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090216640 Masi Aug 2009 A1
20090222449 Hom et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090228918 Rolff et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090234665 Conkel Sep 2009 A1
20090234876 Schigel et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090240609 Cho et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090249440 Platt et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090254375 Martinez et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090254656 Vignisson et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090254971 Herz et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090271265 Lay et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090313049 Joao et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090313562 Appleyard et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090327120 Eze et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090328173 Jakobson et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100010935 Shelton Jan 2010 A1
20100011428 Atwood et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023434 Bond Jan 2010 A1
20100030578 Siddique et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100030677 Melik-Aslanian et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100037299 Karasick et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100042583 Gervais Feb 2010 A1
20100049803 Ogilvie et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100094704 Subramanian et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100094758 Chamberlain et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100114724 Ghosh et al. May 2010 A1
20100145836 Baker et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100153707 Lentz, II Jun 2010 A1
20100169159 Rose et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100169264 O'Sullivan Jul 2010 A1
20100185546 Pollard Jul 2010 A1
20100188684 Kumara Jul 2010 A1
20100205076 Parson et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100211445 Bodington Aug 2010 A1
20100211636 Starkenburg et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100217837 Ansari et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100248681 Phills Sep 2010 A1
20100250338 Banerjee et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100250410 Song et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100250411 Ogrodski Sep 2010 A1
20100250497 Redlich et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100250509 Andersen Sep 2010 A1
20100268660 Ekdahl Oct 2010 A1
20100293090 Domenikos et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110009707 Kaundinya et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110016042 Cho et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110023115 Wright Jan 2011 A1
20110054981 Faith et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110078073 Annappindi et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110113084 Ramnani May 2011 A1
20110113086 Long et al. May 2011 A1
20110125595 Neal et al. May 2011 A1
20110126275 Anderson et al. May 2011 A1
20110131131 Griffin et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110137760 Rudie et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110137789 Kortina et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110142213 Baniak et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110161218 Swift Jun 2011 A1
20110164746 Nice et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110166988 Coulter Jul 2011 A1
20110178899 Huszar Jul 2011 A1
20110178922 Imrey et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110179139 Starkenburg et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110184838 Winters et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110196791 Dominguez Aug 2011 A1
20110202474 Mele et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110211445 Chen Sep 2011 A1
20110219421 Ullman et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238566 Santos Sep 2011 A1
20110258050 Chan et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110264566 Brown Oct 2011 A1
20120011056 Ward et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120029956 Ghosh et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120030216 Churi et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120030771 Pierson et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120054592 Jaffe et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120066065 Switzer Mar 2012 A1
20120072464 Cohen Mar 2012 A1
20120101939 Kasower Apr 2012 A1
20120106801 Jackson May 2012 A1
20120109990 Yamasaki May 2012 A1
20120110467 Blake et al. May 2012 A1
20120117509 Powell May 2012 A1
20120124498 Santoro et al. May 2012 A1
20120136763 Megdal et al. May 2012 A1
20120136774 Imrey et al. May 2012 A1
20120158460 Kruger et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120158654 Behren et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120173339 Flynt et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120179536 Kalb et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120198556 Patel et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120215682 Lent et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120216125 Pierce Aug 2012 A1
20120226916 Hahn et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120232958 Silbert Sep 2012 A1
20120265607 Belwadi Oct 2012 A1
20120278227 Kolo et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120284118 Mamich, Jr. et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120290660 Rao et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130031109 Roulson et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130031113 Feng Jan 2013 A1
20130124263 Amaro et al. May 2013 A1
20130125010 Strandell May 2013 A1
20130132151 Stibel et al. May 2013 A1
20130159168 Evans Jun 2013 A1
20130173447 Rothschild Jul 2013 A1
20130185293 Boback Jul 2013 A1
20130226783 Haggerty et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130268357 Heath Oct 2013 A1
20130279676 Baniak et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130293363 Plymouth Nov 2013 A1
20130332338 Yan et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130332467 Bornea et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140025562 Rothrock et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140032265 Paprocki et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140032300 Zhang et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140040182 Gilder et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140074689 Lund et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140136422 Jung et al. May 2014 A1
20140164112 Kala Jun 2014 A1
20140164519 Shah Jun 2014 A1
20140172687 Chirehdast Jun 2014 A1
20140244353 Winters Aug 2014 A1
20140279329 Dancel Sep 2014 A1
20140304263 Vaitheeswaran Oct 2014 A1
20140316969 Imrey Oct 2014 A1
20140324655 Kolathur Oct 2014 A1
20150066772 Griffin et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150254329 Agarwal et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150278277 Agrawal et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150287091 Koran Oct 2015 A1
20160004728 Balet et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160048700 Stransky-Heilkron Feb 2016 A1
20160227037 Roybal et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160342999 Rouston et al. Nov 2016 A1
20170098096 Redberg Apr 2017 A1
20170177809 Bull et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170249481 Edison Aug 2017 A1
20170262821 Imrey et al. Sep 2017 A1
20180075527 Nagla et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180089379 Collins et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180150599 Valdes et al. May 2018 A1
20180218069 Rege et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180253702 Dowding Sep 2018 A1
20180276222 Belknap Sep 2018 A1
20180330516 Baca Nov 2018 A1
20180343265 McMillan et al. Nov 2018 A1
20190065516 Barker Feb 2019 A1
20190188717 Putnam et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190318122 Hockey et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190356672 Bondugula et al. Nov 2019 A1
20200074109 Pieniazek et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200106764 Hockey et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200106765 Hockey et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200201878 Putnam et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200210492 Chang et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200213206 Bracken et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200265155 Dong et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200279053 Jones et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200327150 Kunjur et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200327560 Anderson et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200364246 Farrell Nov 2020 A1
20200387634 Jones et al. Dec 2020 A1
20200394675 Bradford Dec 2020 A1
20210004373 Sankaran et al. Jan 2021 A1
20210034613 Ng et al. Feb 2021 A1
20210042366 Hicklin et al. Feb 2021 A1
20210064725 Miller et al. Mar 2021 A1
20210158299 Baggett May 2021 A1
20210158368 Baggett May 2021 A1
20210357707 Bondugula et al. Nov 2021 A1
20210400120 Prieditis Dec 2021 A1
20220019733 Billman et al. Jan 2022 A1
20220027853 McMillan et al. Jan 2022 A1
20220070294 Cody et al. Mar 2022 A1
20220138238 Rege et al. May 2022 A1
20220156394 Riley et al. May 2022 A1
20220222368 Min et al. Jul 2022 A1
20220391435 Xie et al. Dec 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (82)
Number Date Country
2004220812 Sep 2004 AU
2010200017 Jan 2010 AU
2022204452 Jul 2022 AU
2 868 933 Oct 2013 CA
2 792 070 Oct 2021 CA
106255985 Dec 2016 CN
112036952 Dec 2020 CN
0 419 889 Apr 1991 EP
0 458 698 Nov 1991 EP
0 559 358 Sep 1993 EP
0 977 128 Feb 2000 EP
0 772 836 Dec 2001 EP
1 850 278 Oct 2007 EP
3 201 804 Apr 2020 EP
3 846 104 Jul 2021 EP
2 752 058 Apr 2020 ES
1 322 809 Jul 1973 GB
349972 Apr 2016 IN
10-222559 Aug 1998 JP
10-261009 Sep 1998 JP
10-293732 Nov 1998 JP
2000-331068 Nov 2000 JP
2001-297141 Oct 2001 JP
2001-344463 Dec 2001 JP
2001-357256 Dec 2001 JP
2002-149778 May 2002 JP
2002-163498 Jun 2002 JP
2002-259753 Sep 2002 JP
2003-271851 Sep 2003 JP
2003-316881 Nov 2003 JP
10-2000-0036594 Jul 2000 KR
10-2000-0063995 Nov 2000 KR
10-2001-0016349 Mar 2001 KR
10-2001-0035145 May 2001 KR
10-2002-0007132 Jan 2002 KR
10-2004-0078798 Sep 2004 KR
2 181 216 Apr 2002 RU
I256569 Jun 2006 TW
WO 95034155 Dec 1995 WO
WO 96000945 Jan 1996 WO
WO 98041931 Sep 1998 WO
WO 98041932 Sep 1998 WO
WO 98041933 Sep 1998 WO
WO 98049643 Nov 1998 WO
WO 99017225 Apr 1999 WO
WO 99017226 Apr 1999 WO
WO 99038094 Jul 1999 WO
WO 00004465 Jan 2000 WO
WO 00028441 May 2000 WO
WO 00055778 Sep 2000 WO
WO 00065469 Nov 2000 WO
WO 01009752 Feb 2001 WO
WO 01009792 Feb 2001 WO
WO 01010090 Feb 2001 WO
WO 01084281 Nov 2001 WO
WO 2004031986 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004084098 Sep 2004 WO
WO 2004088464 Oct 2004 WO
WO 2004114160 Dec 2004 WO
WO 2005059781 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2006050278 May 2006 WO
WO 2008022289 Feb 2008 WO
WO 2008042614 Apr 2008 WO
WO 2008054403 May 2008 WO
WO 2008127288 Oct 2008 WO
WO 2009076555 Jun 2009 WO
WO 2009117518 Sep 2009 WO
WO 2010132492 Nov 2010 WO
WO 2013009920 Jan 2013 WO
WO 2014018900 Jan 2014 WO
WO 2014066816 May 2014 WO
WO 2015057538 Apr 2015 WO
WO 2018144612 Aug 2018 WO
WO 2018236732 Dec 2018 WO
WO 2019089439 May 2019 WO
WO 2019136407 Jul 2019 WO
WO 2019157491 Aug 2019 WO
WO 2019183483 Sep 2019 WO
WO 2020198236 Oct 2020 WO
WO 2020232137 Nov 2020 WO
WO 2021081516 Apr 2021 WO
WO 2022109613 May 2022 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (169)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 16/124,989, U.S. Pat. No. 10,963,434, Data Architecture for Supporting Multiple Search Models, filed Sep. 7, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,489, filed Feb. 12, 2010, Bargoli et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,511, filed Feb. 12, 2010, Bargoli et al.
Actuate, “Delivering Enterprise Information for Corporate Portals”, White Paper, 2004, pp. 1-7.
Akl, Selim G., “Digital Signatures: A Tutorial Survey,” Computer, Feb. 1983, pp. 15-24.
Aktas et al., “Personalizing PageRank Based on Domain Profiles”, WEBKDD workshop: Webmining and Web Usage Analysis, Aug. 22, 2004, pp. 83-90.
Aktas et al., “Using Hyperlink Features to Personalize Web Search”, WEBKDD workshop: Webmining and Web Usage Analysis, Aug. 2004.
Babcock, Gwen, “Aggregation Without Aggravation: Determining Spatial Contiguity and Joining Geographic Areas Using Hashing”, SAS Global Forum 2010, Reporting and Information Visualization, Paper 223-2010, pp. 17.
Bitran et al., “Mailing Decisions in Catalog Sales Industry”, Management Science (JSTOR), vol. 42, No. 9, pp. 1364-1381, Sep. 1996.
Brick, et al. “Unit and Item Response, Weighting, and Imputation Procedures in the 1993 National Household Education Survey (NHES:93)” U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics, Working Paper No. 97-05, Washington, D.C., pp. 30, Feb. 1997.
Burr Ph.D., et al., “Utility Payments as Alternative Credit Data: A Reality Check”, Asset Builders of America, Inc., Oct. 5, 2006, pp. 1-18, Washington, D.C.
Buxfer, http://www.buxfer.com/ printed Feb. 5, 2014 in 1 page.
Cáceres, et al., “Measurement and Analysis of IP Network Usage and Behavior”, IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 144-151, May 2000.
Census Geography, Excerpted from the Geographic Reference Manual, Nov. 1994, pp. 5.
Check, http://check.me/ printed Feb. 5, 2014 in 3 pages.
Chiba et al., “Mobility Management Schemes for Heterogeneity Support in Next Generation Wireless Networks”, 3rd EuroNGI Conference on, 2007, pp. 143-150.
“Consumer Reports Finds American-Made Vehicles Close Reliability Gap with European-Made Vehicle—As Japanese Continue to Set New Benchmarks for the Industry”, Consumer Reports: Consumers Union, Yonkers, NY, Apr. 2003, pp. 2.
Corepoint Health, “The Continuity of Care Document—Changing the Landscape of Healthcare Information Exchange,” Jan. 2009, pp. 9.
Cohen et al., “Optimizer: IBM's Multi Echelon Inventory System for Managing Service Logistics”, Interfaces, vol. 20, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1990, pp. 65-82.
“D&B Corporate Family Linkage”, D&B Internet Access for U.S. Contract Customers, https://www.dnb.com/ecomp/help/linkage.htm as printed Dec. 17, 2009, pp. 1.
Dankar et al., “Efficient Private Information Retrieval for Geographical Aggregation”, Procedia Computer Science, 2014, vol. 37, pp. 497-502.
“Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Software”, http://www.symantec.com/data-loss-prevention/ printed Apr. 8, 2013 in 8 pages.
“Data Protection”, http://compliantprocessing.com/data-protection/ printed Apr. 8, 2013 in 4 pages.
Davies, Donald W., “Applying the RSA Digital Signature to Electronic Mail,” Computer, Feb. 1983, pp. 55-62.
“Debt Settlement: Watch Video on how to Pay Your Debt Faster”, http://www.debtconsolidationcare.com/debt-settlement.html printed Jan. 9, 2013 in 6 pages.
Elmasri et al., “Fundamentals of Database Systems, Third Edition (Excerpts)”, Jun. 2000, pp. 253, 261, 268-70, 278-80, 585, 595.
Ettorre, “Paul Kahn on Exceptional Marketing,” Management Review, vol. 83, No. 11, Nov. 1994, pp. 48-51.
“Experian Helps Verify the Identity of Patients and Provide Secure Enrollment to Healthcare Portals by Integrating with Major Electronic Medical Records Platform,” http://press.experian.com/United-States/Press-Release/experian-helps-verify-the-identity-of-patients-and-provide-secure-enrollment-to-healthcare.aspx?&p=1, Dec. 19, 2013, pp. 2.
Experian: Improve Outcomes Through Applied Customer Insight, Brochure, Nov. 2009, pp. 20.
Experian: Mosaic Geodemographic Lifestyle Segmentation on ConsumerView [Data Card], as printed from http://datacards.experian.com/market?page=research/datacard_print&prin, Apr. 6, 2012, pp. 4.
Experian: Mosaic Public Sector 2009 Launch, Jul. 2009, pp. 164.
Experian: Mosaic United Kingdom, Brochure, Jun. 2009, pp. 24.
Experian: Mosaic UK—Optimise the Value of Your Customers and Locations, Now and in the Future, Brochure, Sep. 2010, pp. 24.
Experian: Mosaic UK—Unique Consumer Classification Based on In-Depth Demographic Data, as printed from http://www.experian.co.uk/business-strategies/mosaic-uk.html, Jul. 30, 2012, pp. 2.
Experian: Mosaic USA, Brochure, May 2009, pp. 14.
Experian: Mosaic USA—Consumer Lifestyle Segmentation [Data Card], Dec. 2009, pp. 2.
Experian: Public Sector, as printed form http://publicsector.experian.co.uk/Products/Mosaicpublicsector.aspx, Jul. 2009, pp. 2.
Experian, “Experian Rental Payment Data,” http://www.experian.com/rentbureau/rental-data.html printed Nov. 22, 2013 in 2 pages.
Fenner, Peter, “Mobile Address Management and Billing for Personal Communications”, 1st International Conference on Universal Personal Communications, 1992, ICUPC '92 Proceedings, pp. 253-257.
“Fictitious Business Name Records”, Westlaw Database Directory, http://directory.westlaw.com/scope/default.asp?db=FBN-ALL&RS-W...&VR=2.0 as printed Dec. 17, 2009, pp. 5.
Fisher, Joseph, “Access to Fair Credit Reports: Current Practices and Proposed Legislation,” American Business Law Journal, Fall 1981, vol. 19, No. 3, p. 319.
Garcia-Molina et al., “Database Systems: The Complete Book”, Prentice Hall, Inc., Ch. 15, Oct. 1, 2001, pp. 713-715.
“Geographic Aggregation Tool SAS Beta Version 4.1”, Environmental Health Surveillance Section, New York State Dept. in Health, Troy, NY, Mar. 24, 2015, pp. 10.
Gionis et al., “Similarity Search in High Dimensions via Hashing”, Sep. 7, 1999, pp. 518-529.
“GLBA Compliance and FFIEC Compliance” http://www.trustwave.com/financial-services.php printed Apr. 8, 2013 in 1 page.
Glenn, Brandon, “Multi-provider patient portals get big boost with ONC ruling”, Feb. 25, 2013, http://medicaleconomics.modernmedicine.com/medical-economics/news/user-defined-tags/meaningful-use/multi-provider-patient-portals-get-big-boost in 2 pages.
Haffar, Imad, “‘SPAM’: A Computer Model for Management of Spare-Parts Inventories in Agricultural Machinery Dealerships”, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 12, Issue 4, Jun. 1995, pp. 323-332.
Hampton et al., “Mapping Health Data: Improved Privacy Protection With Donut Method Geomasking”, American Journal of Epidemiology, Septembers, 2010, vol. 172, No. 9, pp. 8.
Handfield et al., “Managing Component Life Cycles in Dynamic Technological Environments”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Tempe, Spring 1994, vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 20-28.
Healow.com, Various screenshots from page titled “Health and Online Wellness,” https://healow.com/apps/jsp/webview/index.jsp printed Aug. 19, 2013 in 4 pages.
Healthspek.com, “How Good Are We?” http://healthspek.com/how-good-are-we/ printed Jan. 21, 2014 in 2 pages.
“Healthspek Users Can Now Import Their Doctors' Records into Their Personal Health Record,” PRWeb, Nashville, TN, Jan. 14, 2014, pp. 1 http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/01/prweb11485346.htm.
Herron, Janna, “Social Media-Based Credit Score?”, http://www.bankrate.com/financing/credit-cards/social-media-based-credit-score/, posted Friday, Jan. 13, 2012, printed Nov. 22, 2013 in 2 pages.
igiHealth.com, “Orbit® PHR: Personal Health Record (PHR),” http://www.igihealth.com/consumers/orbit_phr.html, printed Jan. 21, 2014 in 2 pages.
Inderfurth et al., “Decision Support for Spare Parts Acquisition in Post Product Life Cycle”, Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2008, vol. 16, pp. 17-42.
InsightsOne.com, “Healthcare,” http://insightsone.com/healthcare-predictive-analytics/ printed Mar. 6, 2014 in 5 pages.
“Japan's JAAI System Appraises Used Cars Over Internet”, Asia Pulse, Mar. 3, 2000, p. 1.
Jaro, Matthew A., “Probabilistic Linkage of Large Public Health Data Files”, Statistics in Medicine, 1995, vol. 14, pp. 491-498.
Käki, Anssi, “Forecasting in End-Of-Life Spare Parts Procurement”, Master's Thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, System Analysis Laboratory, Jul. 27, 2007, pp. 84.
Khare et al., “Nutch: A Flexible and Scalable Open-Source Web Search Engine”, CommerceNet Labs Technical Reprt 04-04, Nov. 2004, pp. 15.
Kim et al., “Optimal Pricing, EOL (End of Life) Warranty, and Spare Parts Manufacturing Strategy Amid Product Transition”, European Journal of Operation Research, 2008, vol. 188, pp. 723-745.
Krupp, James A.G., “Forecasting for the Automotive Aftermarket”, The Journal of Business Forecasting Methods & Systems, Winter 1993-1994, vol. 12, No. 4, ABI/Inform Global, pp. 8-12.
Kwan et al., “Protection of Geoprivacy and Accuracy of Spatial Information: How Effective Are Geographical Masks?” Carographica, Summer 2004, vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 15-27.
Lanubile, et al., “Evaluating Empirical Models for the Detection of High-Risk Components: Some Lessons Learned”, 20th Annual Software Engineering Workshop, Nov. 29-30, 1995, Greenbelt, Maryland, pp. 1-6.
Lapide, Larry, “New Developments in Business Forecasting”, The Journal of Business Forecasting, Spring 2002, pp. 12-14.
LendingTree.com, “Lender Ratings & Reviews,” http://web.archive.org/web/20091015043716/http://www.lendingtree.com/lender-reviews/, Oct. 15, 2009, in 21 pages.
Li et al., “Automatic Verbal Information Verification for User Authentication”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 8, No. 5, Sep. 2000, pp. 585-596.
Lobo, Jude, “MySAP.com Enterprise Portal Cookbook,” SAP Technical Delivery, Feb. 2002, vol. 1, pp. 1-13.
Lovelace, Robin, “IPFinR: An Implementation of Spatial Microsimulation in R”, RL's Powerstar, Jun. 12, 2013, pp. 9, https://robinlovelace.wordpress.com/2013/06/12/ipfinr-an-implementation-of-spatial-microsimulation-in-r/.
Maciejewski et al., “Understanding Syndromic Hotspots—A Visual Analytics Approach”, Conference Paper, IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, Oct. 21-23, 2017, pp. 35-42.
Manilla, http://www.manilla.com/how-it-works/ printed Feb. 5, 2014 in 1 page.
McNamara, Paul, “Start-up's pitch: The Envelope, please,” Network World, Apr. 28, 1997, vol. 14, No. 17, p. 33.
Medick et al., “German Agency to Mine Facebook to Assess Creditworthiness”, Jun. 7, 2012, http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/german-credit-agency-plans-to-analyze-individual-facebook-pages-a-837539.html printed Nov. 22, 2013 in 2 pages.
MERit Credit Engine™, Diagram, https://web.archive.org/web/20020204202530/http://creditengine.net/diagram.htm, copyright 1997, archived Feb. 4, 2002, pp. 1.
Microbilt, “PRBC Credit Reporting Agency—Payment Reporting Builds Credit,” retrieved from http://www.microbilt.com/nontraditional-credit-report.aspx and corresponding “Sample Report,” retrieved from http://www.microbilt.com/pdfs/PRBC%20Sample%20Report%20(complete).pdf printed Nov. 21, 2013 in 8 pages.
Microfinance Africa, “Philippines: Microfinance Players to get Their Own Credit Info Bureau,” Apr. 5, 2011, http://microfinanceafrica.net/microfinance-around-the-world/philippines-microfinance-players-to-get-their-own-credit-info-bureau/ printed Nov. 22, 2013 in 2 pages.
Microsoft, “Expand the Reach of Your Business,” Microsoft Business Solutions, 2004, in 16 pages.
Miller, Joe, “NADA Used-Car Prices Go Online”, Automotive News, Jun. 14, 1999, p. 36.
Mint.com, http://www.mint.com/how-it-works/ printed Feb. 5, 2013 in 2 pages.
Moore, John R., Jr. “Forecasting and Scheduling for Past-Model Replacement Parts”, Management Science, Application Series, vol. 18, No. 4, Part 1, Dec. 1971, pp. B-200-B-213.
“Mosaic” (geodemography), available from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosaic_(geodemography), as last modified Jul. 13, 2012. pp. 4.
Mvelopes, http://www.mvelopes.com/ printed Feb. 5, 2014 in 2 pages.
MyReceipts, http://www.myreceipts.com/, printed Oct. 16, 2012 in 1 page.
MyReceipts—How it Works, http://www.myreceipts.com/howItWorks.do, printed Oct. 16, 2012 in 1 page.
“Name Availability Records”, Westlaw Database Directory, http://directory.westlaw.com/scope/default.asp?db=NA-ALL&RS=W...&VR=2.0 as printed Dec. 17, 2009, pp. 5.
Nelson et al., “Efficient, Automatic Web Resource Harvesting”, Conference: Eighth ACM International Workshop on Web Information and Data Management (WIDM 2006), Arlington, Virginia, USA, Nov. 10, 2006, pp. 8.
“New FICO score extends lenders' reach to credit-underserved millions”, Viewpoints: News, Ideas and Solutions from Fair Isaac, Sep./Oct. 2004 as downloaded from http://www.fairisaac.com/NR/exeres/F178D009-B47A-444F-BD11-8B4D7D8B3532,frame . . . in 6 pages.
Organizing Maniac's Blog—Online Receipts Provided by MyQuickReceipts.com, http://organizingmaniacs.wordpress.com/2011/01/12/online-receipts-provided-by-myquickreceipts.com/ dated Jan. 12, 2011 printed Oct. 16, 2012 in 3 pages.
Packer, A. H., “Simulation and Adaptive Forecasting an Applied to Inventory Control”, Operations Research, Jul. 1965, vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 660-679.
“Parse”, Definition from PC Magazine Encyclopedia, http://www/pcmag.com/encyclopedia_term_0,2542,t=parse&i=48862,00.asp as downloaded Mar. 5, 2012.
PersonalCapital.com, http://www.personalcapital.com/how-it-works printed Feb. 5, 2014 in 5 pages.
Peters, Peter-Paul, “A Spare Parts Configurator for the European Service Business” (Graduation Report), Honeywell, Industrial Service Logistic Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Mar. 2000, pp. 80.
Planet Receipt—Home, http://www.planetreceipt.com/home printed Oct. 16, 2012 in 1 page.
Planet Receipt—Solutions & Features, http://www.planetreceipt.com/solutions-features printed Oct. 16, 2012 in 2 pages.
Ponniah, Paulraj, “Data Warehousing Fundamentals: A Comprehensive Guide for IT Professionals”, Wiley-Interscience Publication, pp. 257-289, 377-397, Aug. 3, 2001.
Porter, G. Zell, “An Economic Method for Evaluating Electronic Component Obsolescence Solutions”, www.gidep.org/data/dmsms/library/zell.pdf, May 1998, pp. 1-9.
“PostX to Present at Internet Showcase”, PR Newswire, Apr. 28, 1997, pp. 2.
PostX, “PostX® Envelope and ActiveView”, http://web.archive.org/web/19970714203719/http://www.postx.com/priducts_fm.html, Jul. 14, 1997 (retrieved Nov. 7, 2013) in 2 pages.
“PremierGuide Announces Release 3.0 of Local Search Platform”, Business Wire, Mar. 4, 2004, Palo Alto, CA, p. 5574.
“Qualifying For Debt Settlement”, http://www.certifieddebt.com/debt/settlement-qualifications.shtml printed Jan. 9, 2013 in 2 pages.
Rahm, et al. “Data Cleaning: Problems and Current Approaches”, Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering, Dec. 2000, vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 11.
Raman, et al., “Potter's Wheel: An Interactive Data Cleaning System”, Proceedings of the 27th VLDB Conference, Roma, Italy, 2001, pp. 10.
“Resolve Debt for Less: With Help from Freedom Financial” http://www.debtsettlementusa.com/ printed Jan. 9, 2013 in 6 pages.
Roos, Gina, “Web-Based Service Helps OEMs Cure Parts Obsolescence Blues”, Electronic Engineering Times, Oct. 8, 2001, p. 86.
Santarini, Michael, “Forecasts the Probable Obsolescence of Components—Module Predicts Parts Life”, Electronic Engineering Times, Jan. 11, 1999, vol. 1, p. 48.
SAS, “SAS® Information Delivery Portal”, Fact Sheet, 2008, in 4 pages.
Sawyers, Arlena, “NADA to Offer Residual Guide”, Automotive News, May 22, 2000, p. 1.
Sax, Michael M., Data Collection and Privacy Protection: An International Perspective, Presentation: Managing Online Risk and Liability Conference, Aug. 31, 1999, pp. 58.
Schneier, B. “Applied Cryptography”, John Wiley & Sons, Second Edition, pp. 435-447, 1996.
“Settling Your Debts—Part 1 in Our Debt Settlement Series”, http://www.creditinfocenter.com/debt/settle_debts.shtml printed Jan. 9, 2013 in 6 pages.
ShoeBoxed, https://www.shoeboxed.com/sbx-home/ printed Oct. 16, 2012 in 4 pages.
Smith, Richard M., “The Web Bug FAQ”, Nov. 11, 1999, Version 1.0, pp. 4.
Smith, Wendell R., “Product Differentiation and Market Segmentation as Alternative Marketing Strategies”, The Journal of Marketing, The American Marketing Association, Brattleboro, Vermont, Jul. 1956, vol. XXI, pp. 3-8.
“STAGG Variables Sum Up Credit Attributes for Automated Decisions”, PRWeb, May 11, 2011, pp. 2. http://www.prweb.com/releases/2011/5/prweb8404324.htm.
Stallings, W. “Cryptography and Network Security Principles and Practice”, Prentice Hall, Second Edition, pp. 295, 297, Jul. 15, 1998.
Stone, “Linear Expenditure Systems and Demand Analysis: An Application to the Pattern of British Demand”, The Economic Journal: The Journal of The Royal Economic Society, Sep. 1954, pp. 511-527, vol. LXIV, Macmillan & Co., London.
Sullivan, Laurie, “Obsolete-Parts Program Thriving”, EBN, Manhasset, NY, Jan. 21, 2002, Issue 1296, p. 26.
Tan et al., “Modeling of Web Robot Navigational Patterns”, 2000, Department of Computer Science; University of Minnesota, pp. 7.
Tennant, Don, “How a Health Insurance Provider Uses Big Data to Predict Patient Needs,” http://www.itbusinessedge.com/blogs/from-under-the-rug/how-a-health-insurance-provider-uses-big-data-to-predict-patient-needs.html, printed Mar. 6, 2014 in 2 pages.
Various Posts from the http://www.2p.wrox.com Forums: http://web.archive.org/web/2005045221950/http://p2p.wrox.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=6513 , dated Nov. 15, 2003-Oct. 7, 2004.
“WashingtonPost.com and Cars.com Launch Comprehensive Automotive Web Site For the Washington Area”, PR Newswire, Oct. 22, 1998. pp. 2.
Web Page posted at: http://web.archive.org/web20040805124909/http://www.oracle.com/technology/sample_codete/tech/pl_sql/htdocs/x/Case/start.htm, pp. 1 and 4 of the webpages posted on Jan. 7, 2003.
Web Pages printed Nov. 2, 2004 of Internet Draft entitled “Tunneling SSL Through a WWW Proxy”, Luotonen, Ari, Netscape Communications Corporation (Dec. 14, 1995); 4 pages. http://muffin.doit.org/docs/rfc/tunneling.sub.--ssl.html.
Webpage printed out from http://www.jpmorgan.com/cm/ContentServer?c=TS_Content&pagename=jpmorgan%2Fts%2FTS_Content%2FGeneral&cid=1139403950394 on Mar. 20, 2008, Feb. 13, 2006, New York, NY.
Webster, Lee R., “Failure Rates & Life-Cycle Costs”, Consulting-Specifying Engineer, Apr. 1998, vol. 23, No. 4, ABI/INFORM Global, p. 42.
Williams, Mark, “Results of the 1998 NASFAA Salary Survey”, News from NASFAA, 1998.
Working, Holbrook, “Statistical Laws of Family Expenditure”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, pp. 43-56, vol. 38, American Statistical Association, Washington, D.C., Mar. 1943.
Yodlee | Money Center, https://yodleemoneycenter.com/ printed Feb. 5, 2014 in 2 pages.
You Need A Budget, http://www.youneedabudget.com/features printed Feb. 5, 2014 in 3 pages.
Zandbergen, Paul A., “Ensuring Confidentiality of Geocoded Health Data: Assessing Geographic Masking Strategies for Individual-Level Data”, Review Article, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Advances in Medicine, VI. 2014, pp. 14.
Declaration of Paul Clark, DSc. for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,504,628 (Symantec Corporation, Petitioner), dated Jan. 15, 2014 in 76 pages.
Exhibit D to Joint Claim Construction Statement, filed in Epsilon Data Management, LLC, No. 2:12-cv-00511-JRG (E.D. Tex.) (combined for pretrial purposes with RPost Holdings. Inc., et al. v. Experian Marketing Solutions. Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00513-JRG (E.D. Tex.)) Filed Jan. 14, 2014 in 9 pages.
First Amended Complaint in Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-511-JRG (Rpost Holdings, Inc. And Rpost Communications Limited V. Constant Contact, Inc.; et al.) filed Feb. 11, 2013 in 14 pages.
First Amended Complaint in Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-511-JRG (Rpost Holdings, Inc. And Rpost Communications Limited V. Epsilon Data Management, LLC.) filed Sep. 13, 2013 in 9 pages.
First Amended Complaint in Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-513-JRG (Rpost Holdings, Inc. And Rpost Communications Limited V. Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc.) filed Aug. 30, 2013 in 9 pages.
Petition for Covered Business Method Patent Review in U.S. Pat. No. 8,161,104 (Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc., Epsilon Data Management, LLC, and Constant Contact, Inc., v. Rpost Communications Limited) dated Jan. 29, 2014 in 90 pages.
Source Code Appendix attached to U.S. Appl. No. 08/845,722 by Venkatraman et al., Exhibit A, Part 1 & 2, pp. 32.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT Application No. PCT/US07/76152, dated Mar. 20, 2009.
Official Communication in Australian Patent Application No. 2012281182, dated Jul. 8, 2014.
Official Communication in Australian Patent Application No. 2012281182, dated May 19, 2015.
Official Communication in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280041782.2, dated Mar. 4, 2016.
Official Communication in European Patent Application No. 12811546.6, dated Nov. 25, 2014.
Official Communication in European Patent Application No. 12811546.6, dated Sep. 18, 2015.
Official Communication in Indian Patent Application No. 490/DELNP/2014, dated Jun. 20, 2019.
Official Communication in Russian Patent Application No. 2014101674/08, dated Dec. 15, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/046316, dated Sep. 28, 2012.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/046316, dated Jan. 14, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US09/60393, dated Dec. 23, 2009.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US09/37565, dated May 12, 2009.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2010/034434, dated Jun. 23, 2010.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2010/034434, dated Feb. 4, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/052342, dated Nov. 21, 2013.
International Preliminary Reporton Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2013/052342, dated Feb. 5, 2015.
Partial Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP12747205, dated May 14, 2020.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP12747205, dated Aug. 14, 2020.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2018/016258, dated May 16, 2018.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in Application No. PCT/US2018/016258, dated Aug. 15, 2019.
Ideon, Credit-Card Registry that Bellyflopped this Year, Is Drawing some Bottom-Fishers, The Wall Street Journal, Aug. 21, 1995, pp. C2.
“Intelligent Miner Applications Guide”, IBM Corp., Apr. 2, 1999, Chapters 4-7, pp. 33-132.
Klein, et al., “A Constant-Utility Index of the Cost of Living”, The Review of Economic Studies, Sep. 1, 1947, vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 84-87.
Klein, et al., “An Econometric Model of the United States: 1929-1952”, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Jun. 1, 1955, pp. 4-41.
Klein, Lawrence R., “The Keynesian Revolution”, New York, The MacMillan Company, Jan. 1, 1947, pp. 56-189.
Loshin, Intelligent Enterprise: Better Insight for Business Decisions, “Value-Added Data: Merge Ahead”, Feb. 9, 2000, vol. 3, No. 3, 5 pages.
“ScoreNet® Network”, FairIsaac, web.archive.org/web/20071009014242/http://www.fairisaac.com/NR/rdonlyres/AC4C2F79-4160-4E44-B0CB-5C899004879A/0/ScoreNetnetworkBR.pdf, May 2006, pp. 6.
So et al., “Modelling and Model Validation of the Impact of the Economy on the Credit Risk of Credit Card Portfolios”, The Journal of Risk Model Validation (93-126), vol. 4, No. 4, Winter (Year: 2010).
Tao, Lixin, “Shifting Paradigms with the Application Service Provider Model”; Concordia University, IEEE, Oct. 2001, Canada.
Official Communication in Australian Patent Application No. 2018215082, dated Jan. 21, 2022.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP12747205, dated Feb. 11, 2022.
Official Communication in Indian Patent Application No. 201917029540, dated Jan. 7, 2022.
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 16124989 Sep 2018 US
Child 17176971 US