The present invention relates generally to error correction in communication channels, and more particularly but not by limitation to error correction in data storage devices.
With the increasing demand for high data rate communications systems, there is an need for improved error detection and correction. In this area of technology, iterative error-correction codes (ECC) such as convolutional turbo codes (CTC), low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes, and turbo product codes (TPC) are being considered for various communication applications. The main advantage of these types of codes is that they enable very low bit-error rates (BER) for storage devices or communication links at low signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). However, as density and speed increases, higher error rates are encountered that are difficult to lower in real time using these techniques.
Embodiments of the present invention provide solutions to these and other problems, and offer other advantages over the prior art.
Disclosed are a method and data communication system that reduce errors. The data communication system comprises a combiner circuit that combines a set of information symbols with error correction codes. The combiner circuit generates a set of product codes that are at least three dimensional.
The data communication system comprises a communication channel that receives the set of product codes. The communication channel provides the set of product codes with errors after a channel delay. A channel detector receives the set of product codes with the errors and generates a channel detector output.
The data communication system comprises an error correction circuit that receives the channel detector output. The error correction circuit iteratively removes the errors to provide a set of reproduced information symbols with a reduced number of the errors.
Other features and benefits that characterize embodiments of the present invention will be apparent upon reading the following detailed description and review of the associated drawings.
In the embodiments described below, a data communication system (such as a disc drive) includes a combiner circuit that combines a set of information symbols (user data) with error correction codes and that generates a set of product codes that are at least three dimensional. The use of three dimensional (or higher) product codes greatly enhances the ability to correct larger numbers of errors in a set of information symbols. A communication channel (such as a disc read/write system) receives the set of product codes and provides the set of product codes with errors after a channel delay. The errors are generated by imperfect read or write operations. During long variable delays between writing and reading information, the original information is deleted from the host system and can't be retransmitted to the communication channel. A channel detector receives the set of product codes with the errors and generates a channel detector output. An error correction circuit receives the channel detector output and iteratively removes the errors to provide a set of reproduced information symbols with a reduced number of the errors. The embodiments described correct errors in spite of the long channel delay and noisiness of the channel.
The disc drive 100 is an example of a communication channel that receives sets of symbols (data blocks to be written) and then reproduces the sets of symbols (reads the data block) after a time delay T. The communication channel is noisy, and the reproduced sets of symbols can have errors. Further, the time delay T between writing and reading a particular set of symbols is typically so long that the host computer no longer retains the original set of symbols. The original set of symbols is thus not available to retransmit through the communication channel. To overcome this problem, a set of product codes with three or more dimensions are provided, and the product codes are used to correct errors introduced by the noisy channel. Examples of error corrections that are applicable to disc drives and other noisy communication channels with delays are described below in connection with
The product code set 200 includes a symbol set (set of symbols) 202 that is indicated by a stippled rectangular prism within the product code set 200. This set of symbols 202 is typically data provided by a host system to a data communication system. The remaining portions of the product code set 200 (those not included in the symbol set 202) comprise bits used for error correction.
The error correction codes in all three dimensions are bit-wise error correction codes. As shown in
While the graphical representation in
The data communication system 300 also comprises a communication channel 310. The communication channel 310 receives the set of product codes 308 as a signal U(t) and provides the a set 312 of product codes with errors as a signal U(t-T) after a channel delay T. The communication channel 310 is a noisy communication channel that introduces one or more errors into the product code set with errors 312. The errors are in bits represented by dots 314, 316, 318. There is a delay T associated with the communication channel 310 producing the product code set with errors 312. By the time that the communication channel 310 generates the product code set with errors 312, the original information symbol set 304 is typically no longer present in the host system.
The data communication system 300 comprises a channel detector 320 that receives the set of product codes with the errors 312 and that generates a channel detector output 322. An error correction circuit 324 receives the channel detector output 322. The error correction circuit 324 iteratively removes the errors to provide a set of reproduced information symbols 326 with a reduced number of errors.
In a preferred arrangement, the set of product codes 308 comprise turbo product codes. The set of information symbols 304 is preferably un-encoded. The set of product codes 308 provide distance (such as Hamming distance) between individual information symbols (such as bits or bytes) in the set of information symbols 304.
In a preferred arrangement, the error correction circuit 324 corrects errors using a psi function as described in more detail below in connection with an example illustrated in
The term “e” is the base of natural logarithms (2.718 . . . ) and the term “x” is an independent variable. The error correction codes can comprise single parity check codes, checksum codes or other well-known error checking codes. The channel delay T can be variable without interfering with the error correcting performed in the error correction circuit 324. The channel delay T can be longer than a transmission time of the set of product codes 308 without interfering with the error correcting performed in the error correction circuit 324.
In another preferred arrangement, the channel detector 320 comprises a viterbi detector that couples the set of product codes with errors 312 to the error detection circuit 324.
In a preferred arrangement, the interleaver output is passed through a pre-coder 414 before being passed on to the communication channel 416. The communication channel 416 is noisy and also has a long, variable delay as described above in connection with communication channel 320 in
The communication channel 416 provides a communication channel output (with errors) on line 418 that is applied to a soft output viterbi algorithm (SOVA) detector 420 that is part of an iterative turbo decoder 421. The SOVA detector provides a SOVA detector output 422 to a de-interleaver 424. The de-interleaver 424 initially provides a de-interleaved set of product codes with errors on line 426 to an error correction circuit 428. The error correction circuit 428 feeds corrected data back through interleaver 430 to the SOVA channel detector 420. The operation of the error detection circuit 428 is iterative and loops through turbo iterations 432 until an optimum number of correctable errors are corrected. This looping process is described in more detail below in an example illustrated in
After completion of action block 506, the method continues along line 508 to action block 510. At action block 510, the set of product codes is received in the communication channel, and then the communication channel provides a set of product codes with errors after a channel delay.
After completion of action block 510, the method continues along line 512 to action block 514. At action block 514, the set of product codes with the errors is received at a channel detector, the channel detector generates a channel detector output.
After completion of action block 514, the method continues along line 516 to action block 518. At action block 518, an error correction circuit receives the channel detector output, and the error correction circuit iteratively removes the errors to provide a set of reproduced information symbols with a reduced number of the errors.
After completion of action block 518, the method continues along line 520 to END 522. At end 522, the method is ready to return to start 502 to apply the method to pass a subsequent set of information symbols through the communication channel.
Using the set of product codes preferably provide distance between information symbols in the set of information symbols. The channel delay can vary to a time longer than a transmission time of the set of product codes, without adversely affecting the error correction method.
In a preferred arrangement, a psi function is used in the error correction circuit to correct the errors as described in more detail below in an example shown in
At action block 610, reliability information L1 is updated in an iteration. After completion of action block 610, the method continues along line 612 to action block 614. At action block 614, reliability information L2 is updated. After completion of action block 614, the method continues along line 616 to action block 618. At action block 618, reliability information L3 is updated. After completion of action block 618, the method continues along line 620 to action block 622.
At action block 622, bit decisions are made based on the sign of P(i,j,k) and extrinsic information E(i,j,k) is passed back to the channel detector (such as channel detector 420 in
For both
In the keys 706, 806, (m,m−1)2 2-D TPC/SPC denotes a two-dimensional TPC formed with (m,m−1) SPC component codes; i.e., (m−1) user bits of a row/column are used to calculate the even parity bit for each row/column. To achieve a larger block size, the 2-D product codewords are arranged in sub-blocks to form one large codeword. Similar to the 2-D case, (m,m−1)3 3-D TPC/SPC denotes a three-dimensional TPC where all three dimensions are encoded using a (m,m−1) SPC code. No precoding was used for the 3-D case, whereas a 1/(1/D2) precoder was needed for the 2-D case.
For the two dimensional case, iterative decoding within the error correction circuit is performed by applying a loop consisting of row decoding, followed by column decoding, followed by row decoding, etc. A row decoding followed by a column decoding (or vice versa) is called a turbo iteration, whereas the information exchange between the error correction circuit and the channel detector is called channel iteration. For the three dimensional case, the information bits are arranged in a three-dimensional array and encoding is performed on all three dimensions. With a 3-D structure, each information bit is protected by three codes instead of only two, as it is the case with a 2-D structure.
Only a few permanent error patterns can remain with this 3-D structure when the component codes are SPC codes as illustrated in
Regarding the iterative decoding process, the message passing algorithm (MPA) is extended to the 3-D case as shown in
In
The magnetic recording channel can be modeled as a partial response (PR) channel. Interleavers and de-interleavers are denoted by π and π−1, respectively. Turbo iterations are decoding loops inside the TPC decoder, whereas a channel iteration is defined as information exchange between the TPC decoder and the channel detector. In the example shown in
It is to be understood that even though numerous characteristics and advantages of various embodiments of the invention have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and function of various embodiments of the invention, this disclosure is illustrative only, and changes may be made in detail, especially in matters of structure and arrangement of parts within the principles of the present invention to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed. For example, the particular elements may vary depending on the particular application for the data communication system while maintaining substantially the same functionality without departing from the scope of the present invention. The arrangements shown can be applied to electronic, optical and magnetic communication channels. In addition, although the preferred embodiment described herein is directed to a data communication system for a disc drive, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the teachings of the present invention can be applied to MRAM and other data communication systems with long delay times, without departing from the scope of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4665537 | Moriyama | May 1987 | A |
4670881 | Imoto | Jun 1987 | A |
4682333 | Onishi et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4731799 | Longstaff et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
5321703 | Weng | Jun 1994 | A |
5563897 | Pyndiah et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5708667 | Hayashi | Jan 1998 | A |
5859859 | Kim | Jan 1999 | A |
6526538 | Hewitt | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6581178 | Kondo | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6606725 | Wang et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6628723 | Gerlach et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6802037 | Kim et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7100101 | Hemphill et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7127658 | Cucchi et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
20010016931 | Mottier et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010050622 | Hewitt et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010892 | Lodge et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026615 | Hewitt et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020083391 | Huggett et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020174403 | Chethik | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030033570 | Khannanov et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043487 | Morita et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056166 | Kim et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030066020 | Morita et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093740 | Stojanovic | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093741 | Argon et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030106012 | Hewitt | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040019842 | Argon et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040117711 | Farbert et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050149819 | Hwang | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060190271 | Kim et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10147482 | Jan 2003 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050273688 A1 | Dec 2005 | US |