Businesses must process large amounts of data to make strategic decisions and be successful. The data is often provided in formats such as reports. To build a meaningful report, businesses are relying on multi-tenanted software as a service (SAAS) analytic companies. Building and providing meaningful analytics typically require a large amount of resources and have a high cost.
In order to reduce cost, more and more businesses are adapting to cloud based SAAS application models. For example, businesses may store sales data in “Salesforce” applications, accounting data in “NetSuite” applications, and billing data in “Zuora” applications. It is important to have detailed information about a company's performance and positions. Unfortunately, analytic applications do not consolidate data from different SAAS applications and provide a single view. Analytic applications also do not provide data consistency within data collection of different data types. What is needed is an improved analytics system that improves upon the analytic systems of the prior art.
The present system includes an extract-transform-load (ETL) platform which fetches consistent datasets in a batch for a given period of time and provides the ability to rollback that batch. The batch may be fetched for an interval of time, and the ETL platform may fetch new or changed data from different cloud/on-premise applications. It will store this data in the cloud or on-premise to build data history. As the ETL platform fetches new data, the system will not overwrite existing data, but rather will create new versions so that change history is preserved. For any reason, if businesses would like to rollback data, they could rollback to any previous batch.
In an embodiment, a method for collecting data may include collecting a first batch of data by a server from one or more tenant applications and associated with a first period of time. A second batch of data may be collected by the server from the one or more tenant applications and associated with a second period of time subsequent to the first period of time. The second batch of data may be marked as the current batch of data. A rollback event may be detected, and the first batch of data may be marked as the current batch of data after the rollback request.
In an embodiment, a system for collecting data may include a memory, a processor and one or more modules stored in memory and executable by the processor. The modules may be executable to collect a first batch of data from one or more tenant applications and associated with a first period of time, collect a second batch of data from the one or more tenant applications and associated with a second period of time subsequent to the first period of time, and mark the second batch of data as the current batch of data. The modules may further be executable to detect a rollback event and mark the first batch of data as the current batch of data after the rollback request.
The present system includes an ETL platform which fetches consistent datasets in a batch for a given period of time and provides the ability to rollback that batch. The batch may be fetched for an interval of time, and the ETL platform may fetch new or changed data from different cloud/on-premise applications. It will store this data in the cloud or on-premise to build data history. As the ETL platform fetches new data, it will not overwrite existing data, but rather will create new versions so that change history is preserved. For any reason, if businesses would like to rollback data, they could rollback to any previous batch.
The present system has many advantages over the prior art. Though some prior art SAAS analytic providers provide analytics, these systems don't provide history tracking or snapshot trending features. Building analytics with history tracking or snapshot trending feature requires complex ETL and rollback features. Once data is fetched and placed in an SAAS analytics system and a hardware failure occurs at the SAAS application vendor, if SAAS application vendor rolls back its system to some previous point-in-time, data in the SAAS analytic system will become inconsistent with the SAAS application. In this case, the only possible fix is to erase everything in SAAS analytic, re-provision data from SAAS application and erase all history.
Data consistency is also an issue for previous SAAS analytics systems. All SAAS applications provide an API to access their data. However fetching data using their supplied APIs doesn't provide data consistency. For example, when fetching data from Salesforce, it is possible that the process is fetching all accounts at time T1, and then fetching all opportunities at time T10. Fetching all opportunities at time T10 would result in getting new Opportunities created between time T1 and T10 whose account information is not fetched yet. It may result in inconsistent dataset as receiving an opportunity without account information may produce wrong report output.
When the present system restores itself from any failure (Business application/Application integrator/Data Collector/ETL system); the ETL system can automatically restart the data extraction process as it continuously polls a data collection status and looks up for newer successful batches of data based on timestamps. The ETL system can replay the data extraction process from anytime in the past, without any manual intervention required. This auto-restorability and auto-restartability features ensure data consistency. This system ensures complete data isolation for multiple tenants and guarantees consistent delivery to heterogeneous persistence data stores.
Servers 110 and 115 and client device 120 may each be associated with a tenant (client organization) in a multitenancy. Each tenant of the multi-tenancy may include one or more servers and client devices. Each server and client may include data to be collected by data collection server 130 via integration server 125. In embodiments, integration server 125 may communicate with different SAAS providers, whether provided from a cloud or a particular machine, and communicate with data collection server 130. Client 120 may be implemented as a desktop, laptop, notebook, tablet computer, smart phone, or some other computing device.
Data collection server 130 may collect data from one or more tenant applications on devices 110-120 through integration server 125 and store the data in a staging database 135. The Data collection server may send batch instructions to integration server 125 in response to receiving a start batch request. Data collection server may provide any portion of the staging data to ETL server 140, for example upon receiving a data request from ETL server 140. When data is collected, it is stored and maintained. Batches of data are not overwritten with newly collected data.
ETL server 140 receives staging data from data collection server 130 and may transform the data to a format more useful to a user. For example, the data transformation may include selecting only certain columns to load into a star format, translating coded values, deriving new calculated values, sorting data, aggregating data, transposing or pivoting data, splitting a column into multiple columns, and other processing. Once data is transformed by ETL server 140, it may be provided to data warehouse 155 for future analytics.
Warehouse database 145 may receive transformed data from ETL server 140 and provide the data to analytics server 150 for processing. When data is loaded into warehouse database 145, the data is stored in a star schema and maintained. Transformed data is not overwritten in warehouse database 145. This allows rollback to previous batches of data if needed. A batch log 147 may be stored at warehouse database 147. The batch log may be updated and maintained to track information about each batch of data and may be used in the rollback of data. The batch log may be stored in table format and may include attributes for each batch such as batch ID, tenant ID, data start date and time, data end date and time, DCS processing status, staging database ID, ETL processing status, and ETL server ID. The DCS processing status and ETL processing status may include not started, in-progress, success and failure. The batch log may be updated by ETL server 140, data collection server 130, and other servers of the system of
Analytics server 150 may retrieve transformed data stored in a star schema in data warehouse 155 and perform analytics to the data. The results of the analytics may be provided in the form of charts, graphs, reports or other formats to a user at client device 170.
Though illustrated as one server or one device, each of the servers and clients of the system of
After a batch of data is collected, the batch may be stored or “staged” at staging database 135. Once staged, the batch may be transformed at ETL server 140. ETL server 140 performs transformation functions per batch. The transformed batch of data is then provided to warehouse database 145. Analytics server 150 may access transformed data at warehouse database 145 to generate charts, graphs, reports and other tools for analyzing the transformed data.
A second batch of data is collected at step 220. The second batch of data may include the same data objects as the first batch (sales information, opportunity information, and so forth), but will cover a different period of time. In some embodiments, the second batch will automatically include data with a start time just after the end time of the previous successful batch. Collecting a second batch of data is performed as described with respect to
The second batch is marked as the current batch at step 230. The batch may be marked as the current batch in the batch log 147. The second batch is the most up to date batch and will likely be used for performing analytics. An example of a batch log having a second batch marked as the current batch is provided in
A rollback event is detected at step 240. A rollback event may include receiving input from a user that a rollback should be performed. For example, an administrator may determine that the most current batch should not be used, and may request a rollback to the previous batch. A rollback event may also include an automated event not initiated from a user. For example, if a data load into warehouse database 145 fails, a rollback event may be automatically triggered by the failure.
Upon detecting a rollback event, a first batch (i.e., previous successful batch) is designated as the current batch at step 250. In some embodiments, the current batch information is deleted from the batch log 147 and the previous batch is marked as the current batch. An example of a batch log reflecting a rollback is illustrated in
In response to the request, the DCS 130 transmits batch instructions to integration server 125 at step 320. The batch instructions may indicate the data start time and date, data end time and date, the data to be collected, and the batch ID. For example, the batch instructions may indicate to collect employee records, sales records, and revenue records created or changed during a time period of Jan. 1, 2013 at 8:00 AM to Jan. 1, 2013 at 10:00 AM, and to call the data batch no. 001. The batch log may be updated by DCS 130 to indicate the batch ID and that DCS processing of the batch is “not started.”
DCS 130 receives batch data at step 330. In some embodiments, DCS 130 may receive all batch data requested, a portion of the data, or none of the data. While data is received from integration server 125 by DCS 130, the DCS processing status may indicate “in-progress.” Once the batch data has been provided to DCS server 130, integration server 125 provides a batch end message to DCS 130 at step 340. The request for a batch of data may specify that all new data and changed data maintained by a tenant be collected. If no tenant data has changed or been updated for the specified period of time, no data will be provided and no new batch is created.
DCS sever 130 may stage the collected data for the batch in staging database 135 at step 350. A determination is then made by DCS 130 if the batch data staging has failed or succeeded. The batch data staging is marked as “successful” in batch log 147 at step 380 if all batch data received by DCS 130 is staged or loaded into staging database 135. If any portion of the batch data is not loaded into staging database 135, the batch status is set to “failure” at step 370. If a batch is listed as a failure, the batch is removed from the batch log and the next batch will attempt to collect the same data for the same time period. In some embodiments, the batch log may be updated by script generated and executed by DCS 130, ETL 135 or other parts of the system of
After a change that occurs on Aug. 1, 2012 is detected, the original batch of row 1 is replaced (hence, the strikeout of the data in row 1) and is replaced with two batches, as indicated in the second row and third row of data in the log. The second row of data indicates that the business key is 1, the amount is 500, the data begins on Jan. 1, 1900 and ends at Jul. 31, 2012, the batch ID is 1 and that the batch is not the current record. The third column indicates a business key of 1, an amount of 1000, a start date of Aug. 1, 2012, an end date of Dec. 31, 2099, a batch ID of 2 and that the batch is the current record.
The components shown in
Storage device 530, which may include mass storage implemented with a magnetic disk drive or an optical disk drive, may be a non-volatile storage device for storing data and instructions for use by processor unit 510. Storage device 530 can store the system software for implementing embodiments of the present invention for purposes of loading that software into main memory 510.
Portable storage device of storage 530 operates in conjunction with a portable non-volatile storage medium, such as a floppy disk, compact disk or Digital video disc, to input and output data and code to and from the computer system 500 of
Antenna 540 may include one or more antennas for communicating wirelessly with another device. Antenna 516 may be used, for example, to communicate wirelessly via Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, with a cellular network, or with other wireless protocols and systems. The one or more antennas may be controlled by a processor 510, which may include a controller, to transmit and receive wireless signals. For example, processor 510 execute programs stored in memory 512 to control antenna 540 transmit a wireless signal to a cellular network and receive a wireless signal from a cellular network.
The system 500 as shown in
Display system 570 may include a liquid crystal display (LCD), LED display, or other suitable display device. Display system 570 receives textual and graphical information, and processes the information for output to the display device.
Peripherals 580 may include any type of computer support device to add additional functionality to the computer system. For example, peripheral device(s) 580 may include a modem or a router.
The components contained in the computer system 500 of
The foregoing detailed description of the technology herein has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the technology to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The described embodiments were chosen in order to best explain the principles of the technology and its practical application to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the technology in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the technology be defined by the claims appended hereto.
The present application is a continuation and claims the priority benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/764,446 filed Feb. 11, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,141,680, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5325519 | Long et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5729743 | Squibb | Mar 1998 | A |
6035298 | McKearney | Mar 2000 | A |
6092083 | Brodersen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6212524 | Weissman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6321374 | Choy | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6367077 | Brodersen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6405219 | Saether et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6493744 | Emens et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6573907 | Madrane | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6631374 | Klein et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6711593 | Gordon et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721765 | Ghosh et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6721767 | De Meno et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6732095 | Warshavsky et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6775681 | Ballamkonda et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
7076496 | Ruizandrade | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7191183 | Goldstein | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7225249 | Barry et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7249118 | Sandler et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7290166 | Rothman et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7487173 | Medicke et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7546312 | Xu et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7640264 | Chaulk et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7657887 | Kothandaraman et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7752172 | Boylan et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7779039 | Weissman et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7827350 | Jiang et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7895474 | Collins et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8161010 | Weissman et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8200628 | An et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8335264 | Suzumura | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8423524 | Rana et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8825593 | Dodds et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8832651 | Kibbar | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8874508 | Mittal | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8972405 | Chaulk et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9141680 | Bengali | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9191432 | Bengali | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9442993 | Tung | Sep 2016 | B2 |
20030046422 | Narayanan et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040039879 | Gaither | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040078516 | Henderson et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040236786 | Medicke et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254964 | Kodama et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060047780 | Patnude | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070250480 | Najork | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070282806 | Hoffman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080077613 | Hay et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080120618 | Collins et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080276239 | Collins et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281918 | Kirkwood | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080285738 | Misra et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090024915 | Cudich et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090049288 | Weissman | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055439 | Pai et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090063557 | Macpherson | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090064147 | Beckerle et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090171927 | Nesamoney et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090279613 | Suzumura | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090285067 | Chen et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299987 | Willson | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313436 | Krishnaprasad et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327311 | Becker | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005013 | Uriarte | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100005055 | An et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100087935 | Pettus et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100138615 | Klaiber et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100211548 | Ott et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100229082 | Karmarkar et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110072212 | Kojima | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110125705 | Aski et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126168 | Ilyayev | May 2011 | A1 |
20110145499 | Ananthanarayanan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161946 | Thomson et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110246449 | Collins et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258178 | Eidson et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110302583 | Abadi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120005153 | Ledwich et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023109 | Sternemann et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120110566 | Park | May 2012 | A1 |
20120150791 | Willson | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120221608 | An et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120246118 | Feng et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120254111 | Carmichael | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120259852 | Aasen et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120259894 | Varley et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130018904 | Mankala et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130019235 | Tamm | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130055232 | Rajan et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130073513 | Kemper et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073573 | Huang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080413 | Chen et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130212042 | Rosenberg | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130238641 | Mandelstein et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130275612 | Voss et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140006580 | Raghu | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006581 | Raghu | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140013315 | Genevski et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019488 | Wo et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140074771 | He et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140149494 | Markley et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140149591 | Bhattacharya et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140156806 | Karpistsenko et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140172775 | Niehoff et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140223100 | Chen | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140229423 | Bengali | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140229511 | Tung | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140229577 | Bengali | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140229628 | Mandal | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140359771 | Dash et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20160065651 | Bengali | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 837 158 | Feb 2015 | EP |
WO 0068841 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 2014123564 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO 2014123565 | Aug 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Lomet, David, et al., “Unbundling Transaction Services in the Cloud”, CIDR Perspectives 2009, Asilomar, CA, Jan. 4-7, 2009, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,028; Office Action mailed Mar. 31, 2016, 29 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/936,503; Office Action mailed Apr. 21, 2016, 5 pages. |
Liu, Hui, et al.; “Data Storage Schema Upgrade via Metadata Evolution in Seas”, CECNet 2012, Yichang, China, Apr. 21-23, 2012, pp. 3148-3151. |
European Patent Application No. 13874570.8 Extended EP Search Report dated Jul. 27, 2016, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,028; Final Office Action mailed Sep. 1, 2016, 35 pages. |
European Patent Application No. 13874789.4 Extended EP Search Report dated Sep. 15, 2016, 12 pages. |
Aulbach, Stefan, et al., “A comparison of Flexible Schemas for Software as a Service”, SIGMOD '09, Providence, RI, Jun. 29-Jul. 2, 2009, pp. 881-888. |
Aulbach, Stefan, et al., “Multi-Tenant Databases for Software as a Service: Schema-Mapping Techniques”, SIGMOD '08, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Jun. 9-12, 2008, pp. 1195-1206. |
Bobrowski, Steve, “Optimal Multi-tenant Designs for Cloud Apps”, CLOUD 2011, Washington, DC, Jul. 4-9, 2011, pp. 654-659. |
Brandt, Cynthia A., et al.; “Meta-driven creation of data marts from EAV-Modeled clinical research database”, International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 65, Issue 3, Nov. 12, 2002. pp. 225-241. |
Casati, Frank, et al., “A Generic solution for Warehousing Business Process Data”, VLDB '07, Vienna, Austria, Sep. 23-28, 2007. pp. 1128-1137. |
Chaudhuri, Surajit, et al., “An Overview of Business Intelligence Technology”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 54, No. 8, Aug. 2011, pp. 88-98. |
Chong, Frederick, et al., “Multi-Tenant Data Architecture”, Microsoft Corp., Jun. 2006, pp. 1-15. |
Curino, Carlo, et al., “Automating Database Schema Evolution in Information System Upgrades”, HotSWUp '09, Orlando, FL, Oct. 25, 2009, 5 pages. |
Domingo, Enrique Jimenez, et al., “CLOUDIO: A Cloud Computing-oriented Multi-Tenant Architecture for Business Information Systems”, 2010 IEEE 3rd Intl Conf. on Cloud Computing, IEEE Computer Society, © 2010, pp. 532-533. |
Gao, Bo, et al., “A Non-Intrusive Multi-tenant Database for Large Scale SaaS Applications”, ICEBE 2011, Beijing, China, Oct. 19-21, 2011, pp. 324-328. |
Google Scholar, “Streaming data cloud metadata” Date of download: Nov. 3, 2014 http://scholar.googl.com/scholar?=streaming+data+cloud+metadata&btnG+32 &hl=en&as—sdt=0%C47. |
Grund, Martin, et al., “Shared Table Access Pattern Analysis for Multi-Tenant Applications”, AMIGE 2008, Tianjin, China, 2008, pp. 1-5. |
Han, Jung-Soo, et al.; “Integration Technology of Literature Contents based on SaaS”, ICISA 2011, Jeju Island, Korea, Apr. 26-29, 2011, pp. 1-5. |
Hill, Phil, “Clarification on Cloud, SaaS and Multi-tenant Language”, e-Literate, Sep. 10, 2012, pp. 1-7. |
Jun, Yang, “A Modern Service Oriented Unit-Based Distributed Storage Model for Peer Nodes”, IC-BNMT 2009, Beijing, China, Oct. 18-20, 2009, pp. 659-663. |
Kwok, Thomas, et al., “A Software as a Service with Multi-Tenancy Support for an Electronic Contract Management Application”, 2008 IEEE Intl Conf. On Service Computing, IEEE Computer Society, © 2008, pp. 179-186. |
Momm, Christof, et al., “A Qualitative Discussion of Different Approaches for Implementing Multi-Tenant SaaS Offerings”, Software Engineering (Workshops), vol. 11, © 2011, pp. 139-150. |
“Multi-tenancy”, Whatls.com, Apr. 5, 2011, 1 page. |
“Multitenancy”, Wikipedia, downloaded from: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-tenant on Oct. 3, 2014, pp. 1-5. |
Nadkami, Parkash M., “Metadata for Data Warehousing”, Meta-Driven Software Systems in Biomedicine, Health Informatics 2011, Apr. 29, 2011, pp. 359-372. |
Park, Kyounghyun, et al., “SaaSpia Platform: Integrating and Customizing On-Demand Applications Supporting Multi-tenancy”, ICACT 2012, PyeongChang, Korea, Feb. 19-22, 2012, pp. 961-964. |
Schaffner, Jan. et al., “Towards Analytics-as-a-Service Using an In-Memory Column Database”, Information and Software as Services, LNBIP 74, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, German, © 2011, pp. 257-282. |
“Schema”, Microsoft Computer Dictionary, 5th Edition, Microsoft Press, Redmond, WA, © 2002, p. 465. |
“Software as a service”, Wikipedia, downloaded Aug. 2, 2014, pp. 1-10. |
Tsai, Wei-Tek, et al., “Towards a Scalable and Robust Multi-Tenancy SaaS”, Internetware 2010, Suzhou, China, Nov. 3-4, 2010, Article No. 8, pp. 1-15. |
Weissman, Craid D., et al., “The Design of the Force.com Multitenant Internet Application Development Platform”, SIGMOD Providence, RI, Jun. 29-Jul. 2, 2009, pp. 889-896. |
Xue, Wang, et al., “Multiple Sparse Tables Based on Pivot Table for Multi-Tenant Data Storage in SaaS”, Proc, of the IEEE Int'l Conf. on Information and Automation, Shenzhen, China, Jun. 2011, pp. 634-637. |
Xuxu, Zheng, et al., “A Data Storage Architecture Supporting Multi-Level Customization for SaaS”, WISA 2010, Hothot, China, Aug. 20-22, 2010, pp. 106-109. |
Yaish, Haitham, et al., “An Elastic Multi-tenant Database Schema for Softare as a Service”, DASC 2011, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Dec. 12-14, 2011, pp. 737-743. |
PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/046277 International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jan. 7, 2014, 10 pages. |
PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/046280 International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Dec. 6, 2013, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/764,384; Final Office Action mailed Oct. 8, 2015, 15 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/764,384; Office Action mailed May 7, 2015, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/764,384; Final Office Action mailed Oct. 9, 2014, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/764,384; Office Action mailed Aug. 14, 2014, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,028; Final Office Action mailed May 21, 2015, 21 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,028; Office Action mailed Oct. 30, 2014, 18 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/764,173; Office Action mailed Jan. 27, 2015, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/763,520; Office Action mailed Nov. 5, 2015, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/763,520; Final Office Action mailed Apr. 9, 2015, 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/763,520; Office Action mailed Nov. 18, 2014, 18 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/764,446; Office Action mailed Feb. 2, 2015, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/764,446; Office Action mailed Sep. 11, 2014, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160085794 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13764446 | Feb 2013 | US |
Child | 14862007 | US |