This invention relates to data display.
Reference throughout this specification shall be made to use of the present invention in relation to the display of data in spreadsheets. However, it should be appreciated that aspects of the present invention can be used in relation to displaying data presented in other formats, perhaps graphically or in some other format for displaying in particular relational data.
There are a number of spreadsheet programs, one of the more prolific being MICROSOFT EXCEL. These spreadsheet programs have a number of cells in rows and columns into which data can be input. Often the cells within the spreadsheet are related to each other.
For example, there may be a cell that displays a number which is calculated from the numbers represented in other cells in the spreadsheet. For instance, this particular cell may represent the total of a column of numbers. Any change to the numbers in that column will also be reflected in that cell representing the total.
This system works well when all of the data required to be reviewed can fit onto one computer screen display. However, often the user of the software creates spreadsheets which have more data entered into them than can be shown on one screen display at a time.
To accommodate this need, spreadsheet software often includes a facility akin to an old-fashioned system of having separate sheets of paper or cards except this is displayed on the computer, accessed by a virtual tab. For example, the screen may show one set of data. By clicking on a tab, a second set of data is then displayed on the screen with the first set of data being hidden by the second.
Unfortunately, this is still unsatisfactory. This is because the screen does not show all of the data that the user may wish to see. While the user can choose which spreadsheet to view, the user cannot see the effect that changing a cell on one spreadsheet has on another cell on the other spreadsheet.
Another problem is that it can take some time for a user to locate a particular cell. Not only is this another attempt to address the situation has been the ability to include multiple files on a screen which may be cross-linked in terms of having relational data. Thus, it is possible for the user to alter data on one part of the screen in relation to one file and see its effect on another part of the screen in relation to another file.
Unfortunately, these attempts are still unsatisfactory. One problem with this system is that although there may be inter-relational data, there is no physical feel of the relationship between the cells.
For example, on each spreadsheet there may be cells relating to similar data in the same columns and rows for each spreadsheet. However, positioning the spreadsheets beside each other on the screen does not provide an intuitive feel of the relationship of the cells to each other.
Another problem that occurs is that often the single cell has two lots of data assigned to it. One data element is the actual number and the other data element is the formula or relationship equation which generates that number. In traditional spreadsheet programs, the formula is usually only displayed when that particular cell is selected. Therefore, the formula for a number of related cells cannot be displayed at the same time. This is understandably frustrating, particularly when a person is desirous of quickly viewing and assessing the relationship between a number of cells to each other.
It is an object of the present invention to address the foregoing problems or at least to provide the public with a useful choice.
Further aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the ensuing description which is given by way of example only.
According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for creating a visual effect in the display of software wherein the
software is for the manipulation of data,
the method characterised by the steps of
As stated previously, the software in preferred embodiments is spreadsheet software, although it should be appreciated that the principles of the present invention can apply to other types of software, particularly those which relate to the display of data, such as databases, graphical analysis and so forth.
The term second and other group of data may cover such items as formula, relational information, highlights, error messages, hints and so forth which can be associated with the first group of data.
The screen designation code is merely a code that identifies which physical screen the image or software component is displayed upon.
The inventors of the present invention also invented a multi-level screen display and this is described in detail in PCT Application Nos. PCT/NZ98/00098 and PCT/NZ99/00021.
This is a device which is created by combining multiple layers of selectively transparent screens. Each screen is capable of showing an image. In preferred embodiments, the screen layers are liquid crystal displays. Preferably the screens are aligned parallel to each other with a preset distance between them.
With this invention, images displayed on the screen furtherest from the view (background screen), will appear at some depth behind the images displayed on the screen closest to the viewer (foreground screen). The transparent portions on the foreground screen will allow viewers to see images displayed on the background screen.
This arrangement of layering multiple screens allows images to be presented at multiple levels giving the viewer true depth without use of glass or lens.
The present invention will now refer to use with a multi-level screen as described above although this should not be seen as limiting.
The group of data is in preferred embodiments a spreadsheet such as that normally viewed in a spreadsheet program, however this should not be seen as limiting.
It should be appreciated that although reference shall be made throughout this specification now to only background and foreground screens, other aspects of the present invention may utilise more than two screens. For example, various spreadsheets may be on the multiple screens behind the foreground screen.
A group of data may be that information displayed when a particular tab is selected on the screen. Therefore, that group of data or spreadsheet is displayed on one of the physical screens.
The group of data or spreadsheet that can be viewed by selecting another tab may be displayed on another physical screen. Alternatively, if there are two separate spreadsheet programs, these can be imported to an embodiment of the present invention and have separate spreadsheets from the separate files shown on the separate screens with one spreadsheet overlaying another, but with the ability to see both.
One embodiment of the present invention will be an interface that identifies the coding on existing software with these identifiers and assign various data groups to the appropriate foreground or background screen.
The ‘always on top’ functions can be made fully or partially transparent by the present invention.
In one embodiment of the present invention, one screen may have a highlight for a particular cell or group of cells positioned either in front of or behind that highlight. In a variation of this embodiment, the highlights of a number of cells may be colour coded with the codes corresponding to a particular relationship to cells of a certain type.
In another embodiment of the present invention, one group of data on one screen may be the actual values within the cells and the other group or groups of data on the other screens may be the coding or formulas or relational information that actually creates the value shown on the other screen.
In some embodiments, the groups of data may all belong to the same large spreadsheet and the second and consequent screens may merely show the wrap-around of that spreadsheet.
In other embodiments, it may be provided in cells a hyperlink that can take the user of the spreadsheet to other cells or other screens.
Sometimes, the present invention may be useful in error tracking. For example. a mistake in the relational formula between the cells or the data entered may lead to an error. The ability to see a number of cells at once can assist in tracking down where the error occurred or what cells are affected by the error.
In one aspect of the present invention there may be provided the ability to scroll through values on one cell or set of cells on a screen while still being able to view another set of cells on another screen. This is particularly useful where it is desired to be able to search for information or data on various areas of the spreadsheet or database while not disturbing the actual region of the spreadsheet or database that the user is working on.
The scrolling or rotation of data on various cells may be achieved in some instances by the use of a track ball or some other user interface.
In yet another embodiment one of the screens may display tips or hints associated with the cells being displayed on the other screen.
The interface may be a patch for existing software, a library file or a new front end for multiple existing software packages or a completely new operating system.
With existing software that does not have such coding, it may be necessary to implement the present invention by having customised software in which the software developer specifies the software routines which cause the appropriate components and images to go on the appropriate screens.
A further aspect of the present invention is the provision of media on to which instructions in accordance with the present invention has been recorded. For example. this media may be a graphics card, CD, hard drive, floppy disk and so forth.
The advantages of the present invention can now be readily seen.
Because of the physical separation between the screens, the viewer can easily see data on the front screen and on the rear screen as required. Thus, the user can see significantly more data than previously viewable with standard software or standard screens. Indeed the amount of data that the user can see is a multiple proportional to the number of screens in the multi-level screen display.
The viewer can instantly see on which screen holds the cell or data that is relevant to it and select this.
The user can also see at a glance the relational nature of the data on the screens. For example, a change on one screen may cause corresponding change on the other screen overlaying it. This gives an instant appreciation of the effect of a change.
In some embodiments of the present invention the cells which change as a consequence of altering data may be colour coded. This allows the user to more quickly identify where that change has occurred on multiple screens.
Some embodiments may have different shading to make it clear as to which screen the group of data is on, or to indicate which data is grouped together. The overall screens may also be shaded/coloured to give visual clarity.
The present invention also allows the user to easily access a desired cell. Not only is this more desirable for the user in terms of mental satisfaction, but this also is significant in terms of physical relief. A problem that frequent computer users have is occupational overuse syndrome (oos) which is the repeated use of muscles, particularly when typing or using a mouse. Easier access means that the mouse is used less in order to find a particular cell and thus a potentially unpleasant medical condition is avoided.
In some embodiments of the present invention some cells are presented as 3-dimensional blocks which can be selected, moved or removed like blocks in a wall to reveal data on other screens.
It can be appreciated that the present invention overall literally provides an added dimension to the ability of a user to work with data manipulation programs such as spreadsheets and databases. There is considerably more flexibility and also a reduction in the time and effort required by the user to see the relationship between groups of data to each other.
Aspects of the present invention may extend to other standard functions on a spreadsheet program.
For example, spreadsheet programs often come with the ability to present the data graphically. Thus, for multi-relational data sheets, the present invention can also be used to produce 3-dimensional graphs showing the data on x, y and z axes as required.
Further aspects of the present invention will become apparent from the following description which is given by way of example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The screen also shows that there is a second group of data (not shown) and positioned visually under the first group of data. The indicator that there is a second group of data is the tab (3) which reads “FBT Calc—Lease to Own”.
To view the second group of data, it is necessary to select the tab (3). However, in doing so the first group of data is obscured by the second group of data. Thus, the effect of a change on one group of data is not immediately discernable as the user cannot see the other group of data.
It can also be seen that it can be difficult for the user to select a particular cell given that half of the data is obscured at any one time.
It should also be appreciated that spreadsheet programs of this type have the ability to have multiple tabs, not just the two shown.
However, because the files are side by side, this is not intuitive with there being no real physical relationship between cells having the same common row and column. Further, the screen size is still limited and only a certain amount of data can be fitted onto the screen.
The present invention provides for the separate groups of data (whether from separate files of merely separate spreadsheets to be displayed on separate physical screens aligned with each other.
A greater number of layers of course can be used.
The 3-dimensional spreadsheet enables the user to see far greater quantities of data in the one visual display than before.
It also enables the user to quickly select a desired cell. Further, the relational nature of the data to each other can be intuitively perceived.
Aspects of the present invention have been described by way of example only and it should be appreciated that modifications and additions may be made thereto without departing from the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
337333 | Aug 1999 | NZ | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NZ00/00162 | 8/18/2000 | WO | 00 | 2/6/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO01/15128 | 3/1/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3863246 | Trcka et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
4239349 | Scheffer | Dec 1980 | A |
4294516 | Brooks | Oct 1981 | A |
4333715 | Brooks | Jun 1982 | A |
4371870 | Biferno | Feb 1983 | A |
4423929 | Gomi | Jan 1984 | A |
4443062 | Togashi et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4472737 | Iwasaki | Sep 1984 | A |
4523848 | Gorman et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4556286 | Uchida et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4562433 | Biferno | Dec 1985 | A |
4568928 | Biferno | Feb 1986 | A |
4648691 | Oguchi et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4649425 | Pund | Mar 1987 | A |
4712869 | Claxton | Dec 1987 | A |
4768300 | Rutili | Sep 1988 | A |
4927240 | Stolov et al. | May 1990 | A |
4947257 | Fernandez et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5049870 | Fitzgerald et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5091720 | Wood | Feb 1992 | A |
5112121 | Chang et al. | May 1992 | A |
5113272 | Reamey | May 1992 | A |
5124803 | Troxel | Jun 1992 | A |
5198936 | Stringfellow | Mar 1993 | A |
5255028 | Biles | Oct 1993 | A |
5255356 | Michelman et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5283560 | Bartlett | Feb 1994 | A |
5289297 | Bollman et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5317686 | Salas et al. | May 1994 | A |
5333255 | Damouth | Jul 1994 | A |
5361165 | Stringfellow et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5367801 | Ahn | Nov 1994 | A |
5396429 | Hanchett | Mar 1995 | A |
5416890 | Beretta | May 1995 | A |
5416895 | Anderson et al. | May 1995 | A |
5418898 | Zand et al. | May 1995 | A |
5463724 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465101 | Akiba et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5473344 | Bacon et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5475812 | Corona et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479185 | Biverot | Dec 1995 | A |
5502805 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5585821 | Ishikura et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590259 | Anderson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5600462 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5600765 | Ando et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5604854 | Glassey | Feb 1997 | A |
5623591 | Cseri | Apr 1997 | A |
5638501 | Gough et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5651107 | Frank et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5663746 | Pellenberg et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5664127 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675755 | Trueblood | Oct 1997 | A |
5694150 | Sigona et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5694532 | Carey et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695346 | Sekiguchi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5721847 | Johnson | Feb 1998 | A |
5729219 | Armstrong et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5757522 | Kulick et al. | May 1998 | A |
5764317 | Sadovnik et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772446 | Rosen | Jun 1998 | A |
5796455 | Mizobata et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5805163 | Bagnas | Sep 1998 | A |
5813742 | Gold et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825436 | Knight | Oct 1998 | A |
5828420 | Marshall et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831615 | Drews et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835088 | Jaaskelainen, Jr. | Nov 1998 | A |
5880742 | Rao et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5883623 | Cseri | Mar 1999 | A |
5883627 | Pleyer | Mar 1999 | A |
5883635 | Rao et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890174 | Khanna et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5923307 | Hogle, IV | Jul 1999 | A |
5924870 | Brosh et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5963197 | Bacon et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5999191 | Frank et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005654 | Kipfer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016385 | Yee et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018379 | Mizobata et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6031530 | Trueblood | Feb 2000 | A |
6037937 | Beaton et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6057814 | Kalt | May 2000 | A |
6061110 | Hisatake et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072489 | Gough et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6075531 | DeStefano | Jun 2000 | A |
6085202 | Rao et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097361 | Rohner | Aug 2000 | A |
6100862 | Sullivan | Aug 2000 | A |
6111614 | Mugura et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6118427 | Buxton et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6163318 | Fukuda et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6181349 | Bardon et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6204902 | Kim et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215490 | Kaply | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215898 | Woodfill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6239852 | Oono et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246407 | Wilks et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6269173 | Hsien | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282551 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6300990 | Yamaguchi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317128 | Harrison et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327592 | Yoshikawa | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6341439 | Lennerstad | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351298 | Mitsui et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356281 | Isenman | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369830 | Brunner et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377229 | Sullivan | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6418426 | Schlesinger | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438515 | Crawford et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443579 | Myers | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466185 | Sullivan et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6468157 | Hinami et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6496832 | Chi et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6505209 | Gould et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6538660 | Celi, Jr. et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6587094 | Anderson | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6587118 | Yoneda | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6593904 | Marz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6609799 | Myers | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6610102 | Aldred et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6661425 | Hiroaki | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6693692 | Kaneko et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6721713 | Guheen et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6725422 | Bauchot et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6760003 | Sase | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771327 | Sekiguchi | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6845578 | Lucas | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6859907 | McGarry | Feb 2005 | B1 |
20010026625 | Azima et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020091728 | Kjaer et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020093516 | Brunner et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020163728 | Myers | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020163729 | Myers | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030069074 | Jackson | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030132895 | Berstis | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030184665 | Berstis | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040239582 | Seymour | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
8248298 | Sep 1998 | AU |
2480600 | Jul 2000 | AU |
2453800 | Aug 2000 | AU |
6821901 | Dec 2001 | AU |
1011678 | Dec 1999 | BE |
2009960 | Sep 1990 | CA |
2075807 | Aug 1991 | CA |
2139696 | Jul 1995 | CA |
2320694 | Aug 1999 | CA |
2730785 | Jan 1979 | DE |
29912074 | Nov 1999 | DE |
19920789 | May 2000 | DE |
0389123 | Sep 1990 | EP |
454423 | Oct 1991 | EP |
454423 | Oct 1991 | EP |
662669 | Jan 1994 | EP |
595387 | May 1994 | EP |
595387 | May 1994 | EP |
0703563 | Mar 1996 | EP |
0802684 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0935191 | Aug 1999 | EP |
1057070 | Aug 1999 | EP |
0999088 | May 2000 | EP |
1151430 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1177527 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1093008 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1287401 | Mar 2003 | EP |
2145897 | Apr 1985 | GB |
2245092 | Dec 1991 | GB |
2312584 | Oct 1997 | GB |
2347003 | Aug 2000 | GB |
2372618 | Aug 2002 | GB |
93472 | Nov 1994 | IL |
3021902 | Jan 1991 | JP |
3174580 | Jul 1991 | JP |
09-282357 | Oct 1991 | JP |
3226095 | Oct 1991 | JP |
4191755 | Jul 1992 | JP |
6274305 | Sep 1994 | JP |
08-036375 | Feb 1996 | JP |
8030388 | Feb 1996 | JP |
8036375 | Feb 1996 | JP |
8095741 | Apr 1996 | JP |
09-033858 | Feb 1997 | JP |
9282357 | Oct 1997 | JP |
9308769 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10003355 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10039782 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10039821 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10105829 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10228347 | Aug 1998 | JP |
11205822 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000-142173 | May 2000 | JP |
2000-347645 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001-215332 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002-350772 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2002-099223 | Oct 2003 | JP |
1005868 | Oct 1997 | NL |
20005178 | Apr 2001 | NO |
343229 | Apr 2001 | PL |
9112554 | Aug 1991 | WO |
9847106 | Oct 1998 | WO |
9942889 | Aug 1999 | WO |
0036578 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0048167 | Aug 2000 | WO |
PCT NZ0000162 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0068887 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0101290 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0115128 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0195019 | Dec 2001 | WO |
02084637 | Oct 2002 | WO |
02091033 | Nov 2002 | WO |
03003109 | Jan 2003 | WO |
9703025 | Nov 1997 | ZA |