The present invention relates generally to the fields of data processing, and managing changes to data processing devices of a data processing environment.
Advances in microprocessor and related technologies have led to wide spread deployment and adoption of numerous general purpose as well as special purpose computing devices. General purpose computing devices, such as servers and desktop computers, are now endowed with computing power that was once reserved for the most expensive high end computers, requiring special conditioned environment to operate. At the same time, special purpose computing devices such as personal digital assistants, media players, wireless mobile phones are becoming common. Further, advances in networking, telecommunication, satellite, and other related technologies have also led to increase in connectivity between computing devices, making possible networked computing over private and/or public networks, such as the Internet.
However, as networked computing continues to grow in sophistication, enterprise networks become increasingly complex. From configuration, application service provision, change management, to network protection, enterprises currently face many challenges.
The present invention will be described by way of exemplary embodiments, but not limitations, illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like references denote similar elements, and in which:
Illustrative embodiments of the present invention include but are not limited to methods for managing changes in a data processing environment, and hardware/software endowed to practice and/or support the practice of the methods in whole or in part.
Various aspects of the illustrative embodiments will be described using terms commonly employed by those skilled in the art to convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that alternate embodiments may be practiced with only some of the described aspects. For purposes of explanation, specific numbers, materials, and configurations are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the illustrative embodiments. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that alternate embodiments may be practiced without the specific details. In other instances, well-known features are omitted or simplified in order not to obscure the illustrative embodiments.
Further, various operations will be described as multiple discrete operations, in turn, in a manner that is most helpful in understanding the illustrative embodiments; however, the order of description should not be construed as to imply that these operations are necessarily order dependent. In particular, these operations need not be performed in the order of presentation.
The phrase “in one embodiment” is used repeatedly. The phrase generally does not refer to the same embodiment; however, it may. The terms “comprising”, “having”, and “including” are synonymous, unless the context dictates otherwise.
Referring now to
Client Devices 112 are so referred as they are Clients of Change Management Servers 122, as changes to Client Devices 112 are managed at least in part by Change Management Services 132 of Change Management Servers 122. Client Devices 112 may have a peer-to-peer or client-server relationship to each other. Accordingly, they may be any one of a number of electronic and/or computing devices, having hardware, software and/or data. Examples of such devices include but are not limited to servers, desktop computers, laptop computers, tablet computers, palm-sized computing devices, personal digital assistants, media players, cellular phones, set-top boxes, networking devices, and so forth.
In various embodiments, Change Management Servers 122 comprise a cluster of interconnected servers, directly, over a local area network, and/or over a wide area network. In other embodiments, Change Management Servers 122 comprise a single server having one or more processors.
In various embodiments, Change Management Service 132 includes a number of Change Request Queues 134, Change Implementation Queues 136, and Reference States 138 of Client Devices 112. In various embodiments, Change Request Queues 134 are employed to store and hold Change Requests, until they are approved for implementation, whereas Change Implementation Queues 136 are employed to store and hold approved Change Requests, pending implementation. Reference States of Client Devices 138 comprise memorializations or images of the last known good states of Client Devices 112.
In various embodiments, the Change Requests may include identification information identifying the hardware, software and/or data elements to be changed, and/or the changes to be performed. In various embodiments, the Change Requests may further include dependency of the desired changes.
These and are aspects of Change Management Service 132 will be further described below, after an exemplary Change Management Process is first described, referencing
As alluded to earlier,
Further, as illustrated, automated checks 204 on the queued pending Change Requests may be performed periodically (or continuously) to approve or reject the requested changes. In various embodiments, Change Management Service 132 checks the previously approved Change Requests in Change Request Implementation Queues 136 to determine whether all dependencies of each queued Change Request have been implemented. That is, there is no change implementation pending for any identified change dependency of the Change Request.
For the illustrated embodiments, Change Management Services 132 rejects all Change Requests having dependency on pending change implementations. Change Management Services 132 approves only Change Requests with no dependency on pending change implementations. In various embodiments, approved Change Requests are moved from the Change Requests Queues 134 to Change Request Implementation Queues 136 for implementation scheduling and/or assignment to implementers.
In due course, the approved Change Requests are implemented by the assigned implementer(s) at or about the scheduled time, 208. In various embodiments, on notification of implementation of a Change Request, an automated change reporting 210 is performed by Change Management Service 132, resulting in Change Reports 212.
In various embodiments, Change Management Service 132 generates a Change Report 212 by comparing the current state of the Client Device 112 with its previously saved Reference State. In various embodiments, Change Report 212 includes a number of Change Records describing the various changes to the hardware, software and/or data elements of the Client Device 112.
In various embodiments, Change Reports 212 may be subjected to a review and approval process, 214. In various embodiments, the review and approval process may be performed manually, or automated, in full or in part.
For the embodiments, on approval of the changes enumerated in a Change Report 212 for a client device 112, Change Management Service 132 automatically generates and saves 216 a new Reference State for the Client Device 112.
For the embodiments, if a Change Request is to be allowed, Change Management Service 132 approves and moves the Change Request from the Change Request Queue 134 to the Change Request Implementation Queue 136 accordingly, block 306. However, if a Change Request is to be disallowed, Change Management Service 132 rejects the Change Request accordingly, block 308.
In various embodiments, rejections may be effectuated by removing the rejected Change Requests from the Change Request Queue 134, and returning them to the requestor.
In various embodiments, processor 602 may be any one of a number of microprocessors known in the art, or to be designed (as long as they are consistent with the teachings of the present invention), including but are not limited to, the processors available from Intel Corp., of Santa Clara, Calif.
Memory 604 may likewise be any one of a number of volatile storage known in the art or to be designed (as long as they are consistent with the teachings of the present invention), including but are not limited to, the volatile storage available from Kingston Technology of Fountain Valley, Calif.
Mass storage device 606 may likewise be any one of a number of non-volatile storage known in the art or to be designed (as long as they are consistent with the teachings of the present invention), including but are not limited to, the non-volatile disk storage available from Seagate of City, Calif.
I/O devices 608 may include a display, a keyboard and/or a cursor control device.
In various embodiments, communication interfaces 610 include a communication interface for coupling server 122 to Client Devices 112. The communication interface may be a wire based or wireless interface, coupling server 122 to devices 112 via a wired/wireless local/wide area network. An example of a suitable wired network interface includes but is not limited to an Ethernet interface, and an example of a suitable wireless network interface includes but is not limited to an IEEE 802.11b network interface.
Except for the instructions implementing Change Management Software 132 (earlier described), and the manner these elements are employed, each of these elements represents a broad range of the corresponding element known in the art or to be designed, consistent with the teachings of the present invention. The elements perform their conventional functions, i.e. processing, storage, reading, displaying, and so forth.
In alternate embodiments, all or portions of Change Management Software 132 may be implemented in hardware, e.g. using Application Specification Integrated Circuits (ASIC).
Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that a wide variety of alternate and/or equivalent implementations may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown and described, without departing from the scope of the present invention. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the embodiments discussed herein. Therefore, it is manifestly intended that this invention be limited only by the claims and the equivalents thereof.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,681, entitled “DATA PROCESSING ENVIRONMENT CHANGE MANAGEMENT METHODS AND APPARATUSES” filed Mar. 31, 2005 and issued on Mar. 20, 2012 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,140,635, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5063523 | Vrenjak | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5410703 | Nilsson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5542047 | Armstrong | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5655081 | Bonnell et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5745669 | Hugard et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5764913 | Jancke et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5778184 | Brownmiller et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5845062 | Branton et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5878408 | Van Huben et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5913036 | Brownmiller et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5913037 | Spofford et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5933838 | Lomet | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5963959 | Sun et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6041347 | Harsham et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6052722 | Taghadoss | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6064656 | Angal et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6072777 | Bencheck et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6122639 | Babu et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6122664 | Boukobza et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6125390 | Touboul | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6144993 | Fukunaga et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6151643 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6195689 | Bahlmann | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6222827 | Grant et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6253339 | Tse et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6272537 | Kekic et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6341287 | Sziklai et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6356885 | Ross et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
| 6393386 | Zager et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6393474 | Eichert et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6493755 | Hansen et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6535512 | Daniel et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6658568 | Ginter et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6664978 | Kekic et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6701345 | Carley et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6742114 | Carter et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6751661 | Geddes | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6853987 | Cook | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6886047 | Leong et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6895414 | Ford et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6938081 | Mir | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6957227 | Fogel et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6983317 | Bishop et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6996601 | Smith | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7016888 | Slemmer et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7035877 | Markham et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7039698 | Slemmer et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7051050 | Chen et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7058861 | Adams | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7065767 | Kambhammettu et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7080037 | Burger et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7082554 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7158985 | Liskov | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7159036 | Hinchliffe et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7228460 | Pomaranski et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7243348 | Good et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7290164 | Harvey et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7316016 | DiFalco | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7317693 | Roesch et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7360099 | DiFalco et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7437712 | Brown et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
| 7474425 | Sasama | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7529197 | Shell et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7587754 | DiFalco et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7590669 | Yip et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7603440 | Grabowski et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
| 7620715 | DiFalco et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7636736 | Kumar et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7765460 | DiFalco et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7822724 | DiFalco et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 8090677 | Murphy et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8140635 | DiFalco | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8176158 | DiFalco et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8914341 | DiFalco | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 20010044840 | Carleton | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010052010 | Kim | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020026339 | Frankland et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020035561 | Archer et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069274 | Tindal et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116363 | Grainger | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020176378 | Hamilton et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188711 | Meyer et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030005109 | Kambhammettu et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030008662 | Stern et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030101341 | Kettler et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110280 | Hinchliffe et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149756 | Grieve et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030172151 | Schade | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030197743 | Hill et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030202201 | Muto et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030204517 | Skinner et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030217134 | Fontoura et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233431 | Reddy et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040006614 | DiFalco | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040024843 | Smith | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040059770 | Bossen | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040059930 | DiFalco et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040060046 | Good et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040068562 | Tilton et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122962 | DiFalco et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040123133 | DiFalco et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153875 | Amyot et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040186903 | Lambertz | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040187103 | Wickham et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040205182 | Geddes | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243600 | Ikeda et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040252693 | Cheriton et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040254927 | Lang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260803 | Nakamura | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050005169 | Kelekar | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050015622 | Williams et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050043961 | Torres et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050080801 | Kothandaraman et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096949 | Aiber et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050097199 | Woodard et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050120101 | Nocera | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149578 | Sustman et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050165954 | Burdick et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177600 | Eilam et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050207553 | Fleck et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256787 | Wadawadigi et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050278191 | DiFalco et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060025985 | Vinberg et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060031529 | Keith, Jr. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060036560 | Fogel | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060080656 | Cain et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060143685 | Vasishth et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149704 | Wyatt et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060184792 | Berlin | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195905 | Fudge | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212477 | Murphy et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060224663 | DiFalco | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060242277 | Torrence et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070005320 | Vinberg et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070005740 | DiFalco et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070022365 | DiFalco et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070028303 | Brennan | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070043674 | DiFalco et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070043786 | DiFalco et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070124255 | DiFalco et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20080104217 | Srinivasa et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080126377 | Bush et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080229262 | Harashima et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20090171732 | Bobak et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090183236 | Ben-Ezra et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090204701 | Herzog et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20100005107 | DiFalco | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20110137905 | Good et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110138038 | Good et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110138039 | Good et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110197094 | Wagner | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110197189 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110197205 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20120023076 | Torrence et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| Derbort et al., “Conversion of a Rule Based to an Object Oriented Expert System,” IEEE, pp. 751-754 (1991). |
| Kerschberg et al., “Intelligent Network Management: A Heterogeneous Knowledge Source Approach,” IEEE, pp. 314-316 (1990). |
| Parnas, “On the Criteria to Be Used in Decomposing Systems into Modules,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 15, No. 12, pp. 1053-1058 (Dec. 1972). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120179805 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11097681 | Mar 2005 | US |
| Child | 13424152 | US |