Patent Grant
9710101
The present invention relates to techniques for data processing in relation to a multi-touch sensitive apparatus, i.e. an apparatus which is capable of detecting plural simultaneous touches on a touch surface.
Touch sensing panels are in widespread use in a variety of applications. Typically, the touch sensing panels are actuated by a touch object such as a finger or stylus, either in direct contact, or through proximity (i.e. without contact). Sometimes a stylus is used instead. Touch sensing panels are for example used as touch pads of laptop computers, in control panels, and as overlays to displays on e.g. hand held devices, such as mobile telephones. A touch panel that is overlaid on or integrated in a display is also denoted a “touch screen”. Many other applications are known in the art.
As used herein, all different types of touch sensitive apparatuses, including touch sensing panels, touch pads, touch screens, etc, are collectively referred to as “touch systems”.
To an increasing extent, touch systems are designed to be able to detect two or more touches simultaneously, this capability often being referred to as “multi-touch” in the art.
There are numerous known techniques for providing multi-touch sensitivity. In US2010/141604 resistive wire grids are incorporated into a panel to form a tactile sensor, and in WO2009/007704 an array of capacitive sensors is used for the same purpose. WO03/041006 discloses a multi-point touch pad formed by strain gauges incorporated into a panel. There are also multi-touch systems that are based on optical detection, and many of these systems may be scaled to large sizes without adding significant cost. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,465,914 discloses a panel which is internally illuminated by light that propagates by total internal reflection (TIR), where the light that is scattered by a touch object is detected by means of one of more angle-sensitive light detectors arranged at the periphery of the panel. US2008/0284925 discloses the use of a similarly illuminated panel, where the touch objects are detected by imaging the light that escapes from the panel at the location of the touch objects. WO2010/006882 and WO2010/064983 disclose multi-touch systems that operate by propagating light through a panel by TIR, and by identifying the locations of touch objects based on the attenuation caused by the touches in the transmitted light. WO2006/095320 discloses a touch system in which light is propagated above the touch surface, whereby the touch objects locally block the propagating light. WO2010/056177 discloses a multi-touch system including a light guide placed over a display integrated with light sensors, whereby the light sensors are operated to locally detect light that is scattered from the light guide by objects touching the light guide. Other proposed techniques for multi-touch sensitivity uses ultrasound or surface acoustic waves, see e.g. US2010/0026667.
As the availability of multi-touch systems increases, and in particularly as these systems are made available in a wide range of sizes and enabling an increased number of simultaneous touches, it can be foreseen that software applications with advanced user interaction will be developed to be run on devices with these types of touch systems. For example, a user may be allowed to enter advanced multi-touch gestures or control commands, in which fingers on one or both hands are dragged across a touch surface, and it may be possible for several users to work concurrently on the touch surface, either in different application windows, or in a collaborative application window.
Irrespective of sensor technology, the touches need to be detected against a background of measurement noise and other interferences, e.g. originating from ambient light, fingerprints and other types of smear on the touch surface, vibrations, etc. The influence of measurement noise and interferences may vary not only over time but also within the touch surface, making it difficult to properly detect the touches on the touch surface at all times.
The combination of several touches, complex gestures as well as temporal and spatial variations in background and noise will make the identification of touches a more demanding task. The user experience will be greatly hampered if e.g., an ongoing gesture on a touch screen is interrupted by the system failing to detect certain touches during the gesture.
The task of providing a uniform and consistent user experience may be even more demanding if the touch system has a limitation on the maximum number of simultaneous touches that may be detected with accuracy. Such a system may not be able to detect weaker touches when there are touches generating stronger measurement signals. One difficult situation may arise when more than one person operates on the touch surface. For example, in a touch system configured to detect three touches, if a second person puts down three fingers on the touch surface while a first person makes a drag with one finger, it is not unlikely that the system will ignore the remainder of the drag since a drag typically generates weaker signal levels from the touch sensors than non-moving touches.
As another example of a difficult situation, consider a touch system used for a casino application, which enables a number of players and a croupier to interact with the touch surface. If there is a limitation of the maximum number of touches, the touch system may not be able to correctly and consistently detect the interaction from the croupier unless the players are instructed to lift their hands from the touch surface.
The prior art also comprises US2010/0073318 which discloses a technique for detecting and tracking multiple touch points on a touch surface using capacitance readings from two independent arrays of orthogonal linear capacitive sensors. A touch point classifier in combination with a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) is operated on the capacitance readings to determine the number (N) of touch points on the touch surface. Then, a peak detector processes the capacitance readings to identify the N largest local maxima, which are processed by a Kalman tracker to output the location of N touch points. The Kalman tracker matches touch points determined in a current time frame with predicted locations of touch points determined in preceding time frames. For each predicted touch point, the nearest touch point in the current time frame is found in terms of Euclidian distance. If the distance exceeds a threshold, the predicted touch point is output, otherwise the nearest touch point is output.
It is an object of the invention to at least partly overcome one or more limitations of the prior art.
In view of the foregoing, one object is to enable a uniform and consistent user experience when interacting with a multi-touch system.
One or more of these objects, and further objects that may appear from the description below, are at least partly achieved by means of methods for extracting data, computer program products, devices for generating touch data, and multi-touch sensing apparatuses according to the independent claims, embodiments thereof being defined by the dependent claims.
A first aspect of the invention is a method for extracting data from a multi-touch sensing apparatus. The method operates in a sequence of detection frames, each detection frame comprising the steps of: obtaining at least one signal representative of objects on a touch surface of the sensing apparatus; processing said at least one signal for identifying touches; determining a set of identified touches and touch data for the set of the identified touches; and outputting the touch data; wherein each detection frame includes a prioritization based on a previous touch which is identified by the step of processing in one or more preceding detection frames, wherein the prioritization is included in at least one of the step of processing and the step of determining, wherein the prioritization in the step of processing comprises a step of actively favoring that a touch corresponding to the previous touch is identified, and wherein the prioritization in the step of determining comprises a step of actively favoring that an identified touch corresponding to the previous touch is included in the set of identified touches.
By including the prioritization in at least one of the step of processing and the step of determining, thereby actively favoring a touch for inclusion in the set of identified touches, and thus in the touch data to be output, it is possible to control the data extraction so as to achieve a desired user experience, specifically that the multi-touch sensing apparatus operates in way that is predictable, consistent and in accordance with the expectations of the user or users within a general or specific context. By designing the prioritization so that the favored touch corresponds to a previous touch among the touches identified in one or more preceding detection frames, ongoing gestures/drags on the touch screen may be prioritized over new touches, which decreases the likelihood that touches are inadvertently lost in gestures/drags. It is to be understood that more than one touch may be actively favored in this manner. When the prioritization is included in the step of processing, the step of actively favoring certain touches is done during the touch identification, e.g. by selectively optimizing the touch identification to promote identification of certain touches. When the prioritization is included in the step of processing, the step of actively favoring certain touches is done after the touch identification, e.g. by actively selecting an identified touch to be included in the set of identified touches.
Accordingly, in one embodiment, the step of actively favoring in the step of processing operates to promote that the touch is identified in said at least one signal.
In one embodiment, the step of processing comprises a step of identifying a signal feature in said at least one signal, wherein the step of actively favoring in the step of processing comprises estimating the location of the touch that corresponds to the previous touch and identifying the signal feature based on the thus-estimated location. The signal feature may be a local change in signal values in a projection signal, in which the signal values corresponds to transmitted energy on a plurality of detection lines across the touch surface. Alternatively, the signal feature may correspond to a local change in signal values in a distribution of an energy-related parameter within at least part of the touch surface. The distribution may be generated based on one or more projection signals, or it may be obtained from an imaging system of the sensing apparatus.
In one embodiment, the step of processing comprises a step of comparing a spatial distribution of signal values to corresponding threshold values, wherein the step of actively favoring in the step of processing comprises estimating the location of the touch that corresponds to the previous touch and locally changing the threshold values based on the thus-estimated location. The signal values may be included in said at least one signal, e.g. the above-mentioned projection signal(s). Still further, the signal values may be included in a distribution of an energy-related parameter within at least part of the touch surface, said distribution being obtained based on said at least one signal. The distribution may be generated based on one or more projection signals, or it may be obtained from an imaging system of the sensing apparatus.
In one embodiment, the step of processing comprises: obtaining, based on said at least one signal, a distribution of an energy-related parameter within at least part of the touch surface; identifying a set of local extrema (e.g. maxima or minima) in the distribution, and sequentially processing the set of local extrema for determining the touch data, wherein the step of actively favoring in the step of processing comprises actively favoring one or more local extrema in the set of local extrema.
In one embodiment, the step of processing comprises: identifying a number of touches based on said at least one signal, wherein the step of actively favoring in the step of determining comprises actively selecting the set of identified touches as a subset of said number of identified touches. The set of identified touches set may be limited to a predefined maximum number of touches. Further, the step of processing may comprise determining age data for each touch, the age data representing the number of preceding detection frames in which the touch is deemed to be identified, and the set of identified touches may be selected among the number of touches based on the age data.
In one embodiment, the prioritization comprises: sequentially applying different prioritization criteria to actively determine the set of identified touches.
In one embodiment, the prioritization limits the set of identified touches to touches corresponding to previous touches.
In one embodiment, the prioritization further comprises: accessing a history list which contains location data and age data of touch traces, wherein each touch trace represents a previous touch, the location data representing the most recent location(s) of the previous touch on the touch surface, and the age data representing the number of detection frames in which the previous touch has been identified, and wherein the step of actively favoring in the step of processing is based on at least the location data in the history list. The step of actively favoring in the step of processing may be further based on the age data in the history list. Additionally or alternatively, the step of actively favoring in the step of determining may be based on the age data in the history list. The method may further comprise the steps of matching said set of identified touches for a current detection frame to the touch traces in the history list, and updating the history list based on the step of matching. The step of updating may comprise, for each touch trace that matches a touch in said set of identified touches, changing the location data to represent a current location of the touch. Alternatively or additionally, the step of updating may comprise, for each touch trace that fails to match a touch in the set of identified touches, removing the touch trace from the history list. The removal of the touch trace may be effected a given number of detection frames following the current detection frame, unless the touch trace is found to match a touch identified in one of said number of detection frames following the current detection frame. Alternatively or additionally, the step of updating may comprise, for each touch in the set of identified touches that fails to match a touch trace in the history list, adding a new touch trace to the history list based on the touch.
In one embodiment, said at least one signal is obtained from a plurality of sensors arranged within and/or around the touch surface.
A second aspect of the invention is a computer program product comprising computer code which, when executed on a data-processing system, is adapted to carry out the method of the first aspect.
A third aspect of the invention is a device for generating touch data in a sequence of detection frames. The device comprises: an element for obtaining, in each detection frame, at least one signal representative of objects on a touch surface of a multi-touch sensing apparatus; an element for processing, in each detection frame, said at least one signal for identifying touches; an element for determining a set of identified touches and touch data for the set of identified touches; an element for outputting, in each detection frame, said touch data. The device is configured to effect a prioritization based on a previous touch which is identified by the element for processing in one or more preceding detection frames, wherein the prioritization is implemented by at least one of the element for processing and the element for determining, wherein the element for processing is configured to effect the prioritization by actively favoring that a touch corresponding to the previous touch is identified, and wherein the element for determining is configured to effect the prioritization by actively favoring that an identified touch corresponding to the previous touch is included in the set of identified touches.
A fourth aspect of the invention is a device for generating touch data. The device comprises: an input; and a signal processor connected to said input and configured to operate in a sequence of detection frames, each detection frame comprising the steps of obtaining via said input at least one signal representative of objects on a touch surface of a multi-touch sensing apparatus; processing said at least one signal for identifying touches; determining a set of identified touches and touch data for the set of identified touches; and outputting said touch data. Each detection frame includes a prioritization based on a previous touch which is identified by the step of processing in one or more preceding detection frames, wherein the prioritization is included in at least one of the step of processing and the step of determining, wherein the prioritization in the step of processing comprises a step of actively favoring that a touch corresponding to the previous touch is identified, and wherein the prioritization in the step of determining comprises a step of actively favoring that an identified touch corresponding to the previous touch is included in the set of identified touches.
The third and fourth aspects share the advantages and technical effects of the first aspect. It is also to be understood that the devices for generating touch data may involve elements/means or a signal processor for identifying, obtaining, determining, processing or otherwise providing any of the features defined in the above-mentioned embodiments of the first aspect.
A fifth aspect of the invention is a multi-touch sensing apparatus, comprising: a touch surface, a plurality of sensors arranged within and/or around the touch surface and adapted to generate at least one signal representative of objects on the touch surface, and the device of the third or fourth aspects.
A sixth aspect of the invention is a method for extracting data from a multi-touch sensing apparatus. The method comprising the steps of: obtaining at least one signal representative of objects on a touch surface of the sensing apparatus; processing said at least one signal for identifying touches; determining a set of identified touches and touch data for the set of identified touches; and outputting the touch data; wherein each detection frame includes a prioritization based on at least one predefined subarea on the touch surface, wherein said at least one predefined subarea has a fixed location on touch surface or is defined in relation to one or more graphical objects that are interactively displayed on the touch surface, wherein the prioritization is included in at least one of the step of processing and the step of determining, wherein the prioritization in the step of processing comprises a step of actively favoring that a touch is identified within said at least one predefined subarea, and wherein the prioritization in the step of determining comprises a step of actively favoring that an identified touch is included in the set of identified touches if the identified touch is located within said at least one predefined subarea.
By including the prioritization in at least one of the step of processing and the step of determining, thereby actively favoring one or more touches that are located within at least one predefined subarea on the touch surface, it may be ensured that the data extraction achieves a desired user experience, specifically that the multi-touch sensing apparatus operates in way that is predictable, consistent and in accordance with the expectations of the user or users within a general or specific context. For example, it may be ensured that the touch identification (the step of processing) identifies touches in the predefined subarea(s), such that these touches are included in the touch data to be output, even if these touches are weaker, smaller or otherwise more difficult to detect than other touches on the touch surface.
In one embodiment, the method further comprises applying a maximum limit to the number of touches within said at least one predefined subarea to be included in the set of identified touches.
In one embodiment, a plurality of predefined subareas are defined on the touch surface, each subarea having a priority value, wherein the step of actively favoring in the step of processing comprises identifying touches within the subareas according to an ordering given by the priority value of each subarea, and wherein the step of actively favoring in the step of determining comprises selecting, based on the respective priority values of the subareas, the touches to be included in the set of identified touches among the touches that are located within the predefined subareas.
In one embodiment, the prioritization limits the set of identified touches to touches in said at least one predefined subarea.
A seventh aspect of the invention is a computer program product comprising computer code which, when executed on a data-processing system, is adapted to carry out the method of the sixth aspect.
An eight aspect of the invention is a device for generating touch data. The device comprises: an element for obtaining at least one signal representative of objects on a touch surface of a multi-touch sensing apparatus; an element for processing said at least one signal for identifying touches; an element for determining a set of identified touches and touch data for the set of identified touches; and an element for outputting the touch data; wherein the device is configured to effect a prioritization based on at least one predefined subarea on the touch surface, wherein said at least one predefined subarea has a fixed location on touch surface or is defined in relation to one or more graphical objects that are interactively displayed on the touch surface, wherein the prioritization is implemented by at least one of the element for processing and the element for determining, wherein the element for processing is configured to effect the prioritization by actively favoring that a touch is identified within said at least one predefined subarea, and wherein the element for determining is configured to effect the prioritization by actively favoring that an identified touch is included in the set of identified touches if the identified touch is located within said at least one predefined subarea.
A ninth aspect of the invention is a device for generating touch data, said device comprising: an input; and a signal processor connected to said input and configured to obtain via said input at least one signal representative of objects on a touch surface of a multi-touch sensing apparatus; process said at least one signal for identifying touches; determine a set of identified touches and touch data for the set of identified touches; and output said touch data; wherein the signal processor is further configured to include a prioritization in at least one of the step of processing and the step of determining, the prioritization being based on at least one predefined subarea which has a fixed location on touch surface or is defined in relation to one or more graphical objects that are interactively displayed on the touch surface, wherein the prioritization in the step of processing comprises a step of actively favoring that a touch is identified within said at least one predefined subarea, wherein the prioritization in the step of determining comprises a step of actively favoring that an identified touch is included in the set of identified touches if the identified touch is located within said at least one predefined subarea.
The eighth and ninth aspects share the advantages and technical effects of the sixth aspect. It is also to be understood that the devices for generating touch data may involve elements/means or a signal processor for identifying, obtaining, processing, determining or otherwise providing any of the features defined in the above-mentioned embodiments of the sixth aspect.
A tenth aspect of the invention is a multi-touch sensing apparatus, comprising: a touch surface, a plurality of sensors arranged within and/or around the touch surface and adapted to generate at least one signal representative of objects on the touch surface, and the device of the eighth or ninth aspects.
Still other objectives, features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will appear from the following detailed description, from the attached claims as well as from the drawings.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described herein by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings.
The present invention relates to techniques for generating touch data for touches on a touch surface of a multi-touch sensing apparatus. Throughout the description, the same reference numerals are used to identify corresponding elements.
Embodiments of the invention will be described with reference to two main categories of touch systems. One category is denoted “projection system”, which is exemplified in
In the example of
Examples of projection systems are given in WO2010/006882, WO2010/064983 and WO2006/095320, which were discussed in the Background section.
Another category of touch systems is denoted “imaging system”, which is exemplified in
Examples of imaging systems are found in US2010/141604, WO2009/007704, WO03/041006 US2008/0284925, WO2010/056177 and US2010/0026667, all discussed in the Background section.
In both examples in
Before describing embodiments of the invention, a few definitions will be given.
As used herein, a “touch object” is a physical object that touches, or is brought in sufficient proximity to the touch surface 1 so as to be detected by one or more of the sensors 2 in the touch system. The physical object may be animate or inanimate. An “interaction” occurs when the touch object affects a sensor 2 or a parameter measured by the sensor 2. An “interaction strength” is a relative or absolute measure of the degree of interaction.
As used herein, a “touch” denotes a point of interaction as seen in the interaction map. A touch may be associated with different touch parameters, such as a location on the touch surface 1 in any coordinate system, an interaction strength, a size (e.g. diameter, area, etc), a shape, etc. A “true touch” denotes a point of interaction that originates from a touch object, whereas a “ghost touch” denotes a point of interaction that does not originate from a touch object but may be mistaken for a true touch.
As used herein, a “trace” is information about the temporal history of an interaction. Touches from an interaction detected in a sequence of frames, i.e. at different points in time, are collected into a trace.
A trace may be associated with different trace parameters, such as an age, a location, a size and a location history. The “age” of a trace indicates how long the trace has existed, and may be given as a number of frames, the frame number of the earliest touch in the trace, a time period, etc. The “location” of the trace is given by the location of the most recent touch in the trace, and the “size” of a trace denotes the size of the most recent touch in the trace. The “location history” denotes at least part of the spatial extension of the trace across the touch surface 1, e.g. given as the locations of the latest few touches in the trace, or the locations of all touches in the trace, a curve approximating the shape of the trace, or a Kalman filter.
In step 200, sensor readings are obtained from one or more of the sensors in the projection system in the form of one or more projection signals (cf. S1, S2 in
In step 202, the projection signals S1, S2 may be processed for extraction of signal features and/or for signal enhancement, e.g. reduction of measurement noise. This step may involve a matching of signal values in the projection signals S1, S2 to one or more threshold values. More advanced techniques may of course be implemented, for example feature detection, evaluating neighboring signal values, etc. For all types of touch systems, the extraction/enhancement processing is suitably tuned to avoid or suppress ghost touches arising from noise in the sensor readings or inherent artifacts of the touch system.
In step 204, the one-dimensional projection signals S1, S2 (or the extracted signal features) are processed to reconstruct a two-dimensional interaction map M, in which a signal-related parameter is mapped onto the touch surface 1 (or part thereof) based on the projection signals S1, S2. The interaction map M is thus an (often simplified) image of the distribution of touches T on the touch surface 1. The reconstruction may involve a simple geometric triangulation, or more advanced methods such as a tomographic reconstruction or a Bayesian inversion. Examples of such methods may be found in Applicant's patent applications WO2010/006883, WO2011/049511, PCT/SE2011/050520 filed on 28 Apr. 2011, and U.S. 61/391,764 filed on 11 Oct. 2010, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. In projection systems that operate by measuring transmitted energy or power, the interaction map M may be a distribution of an energy-related parameter, such as transmission or attenuation.
Depending on the touch system, there will be different degrees of measurement noise and artifacts in the interaction map M. The artifacts may be generated by the reconstruction process or be inherent to the touch system. In a projection system, there may, e.g., be shadowed regions arising from overlapping shadows from true touches (see example further below). In imaging systems, ghost touches may, e.g., be formed close to true touches.
In step 206, the interaction map M may be processed for signal enhancement, e.g. reduction of measurement noise or artifacts generated by the reconstruction process or inherent to the touch system. The processing for artifact reduction is typically unique and tailored to each type of touch system.
In step 208, the interaction map M is processed to identify true touches TT and extract touch data for these touches. Such touch data may include the coordinates of each touch within the coordinate system CS of the touch surface 1. Other types of touch data include area and/or shape of each touch TT. Since the area is a function of applied pressure, at least for flexible objects (e.g. fingertips), the contact pressure between the object T and the touch surface 1 may also be estimated for each touch TT.
The identification of touches may, similarly to step 202, involve a step of matching the parameter values in the interaction map to one or more threshold values. More advanced techniques may of course be implemented, for example clustering algorithms, evaluating neighboring signal values, edge detection algorithms, etc. For all types of touch systems, the identification of touches is suitably tuned to avoid or suppress identification of ghost touches or artifacts. Step 208 may also involve a separate touch filtering process, in which all identified touches are processed with the aim of removing ghost touches while retaining true touches. Alternatively, such touch filtering is an integrated part of the procedure for identifying touches.
It is realized that steps 206 and 208 need not be executed in sequence, but may be merged into a single step in which the signal enhancement and the touch identification are done by one and the same process or are otherwise inseparable.
In step 210, the touch data is output, e.g. for receipt by a software application program operating on the application unit (7 in
After step 210, the process returns to step 200 to obtain a new set of sensor readings. Each sequence of steps 200-210 is denoted a “detection frame” or “frame”, which thus is a period of time in which data is collected from all relevant sensors 2 and touch data is computed for this data.
It should be realized the process in
In step 302, a set of identified touches is determined for the current frame. This set of identified touches is also denoted “output set” herein and contains the touches that will be processed for generation of the touch data to be output for the current frame. Depending on implementation, the output set may include all touches identified in step 301 or a subset of these touches. As will be exemplified in further detail below, if the output set consists of a subset of the total number of identified touches in step 301, step 302 may include a step of actively favoring certain touches to be included in the output set, i.e. by making an active selection among the identified touches. In one example, step 302 may involve a temporal prioritization, which actively favors certain touches based on age, e.g. by selecting touches to be included in the output set in order of decreasing age. Step 302 also involves determining touch data for the identified touches in the output set. Similarly to step 301, the step of actively favoring in step 302 may operate on data retrieved from the trace history list by step 301′, e.g. the age parameter, and step 302 may also include step 301″ of updating the trace history list.
In step 303, the touch data is output.
By comparing
The touch data extraction process of
As described above, the trace history list contains values of trace parameters for each trace. In step 401, the trace parameter values for the traces in the trace history list are processed for generating predicted values for the current frame. Depending on trace parameters, step 401 may operate to predict the most likely location (coordinates), size and shape for all traces in the trace history list. Step 401 may be omitted, but is currently believed to improve the quality of the distance measures when computing match values (see step 402).
In step 402, a match value is computed between every touch identified in the current frame (i.e. resulting from step 301 in
It is to be understood that the match values may be computed to factor in further trace parameters included in the trace history list, e.g. the age of the trace. The inclusion of an age parameter in the computation of the match values may result in further temporal prioritization.
In step 402, the identified touches are also assigned (i.e. matched) into the trace history list based on the match values. The simplest way to do this assignment, if the match values are calculated to represent a better match by a higher match value, is to start with the highest match value and proceed to gradually lower match values (a so-called greedy approach), and vice versa if a better match is represented by a lower match value. There are many other and more elaborate algorithms for making this assignment, such as Hungarian method (Kuhn's algorithm) or any other algorithm solving bipartite matching based on match values. In an alternative, the assignment accounts for the age of the trace associated with the respective match value, e.g. by starting with the oldest match value/trace (largest value of age parameter) and proceeding to gradually younger match values/traces. Accounting for age in the assignment may result in further temporal prioritization.
In step 403, the trace history list is updated for all traces that are assigned to the identified touches, by updating the trace parameters in the list with values for the identified touches, e.g. the current location, shape, size, etc.
In step 404, touches not assigned to traces are interpreted as new traces and are added to the trace history list together with the trace parameter values.
In step 405, traces that are not assigned to any identified touch are interpreted as lost traces and are removed from the trace history list. In one variant, the removal of such a trace is delayed for a few (1-10) frames to make it possible to find touches belonging to the trace in a later frame. This may e.g. avoid removal of weak traces that may be temporarily hidden in noise or artifacts.
Below follows a few non-limiting examples of how the temporal prioritization in steps 301-302 (
1. Temporal Prioritization in Projection Signals (Step 202)
In this example, the temporal prioritization is applied to the process of extracting signal features from the projection signals S1, S2 for use in the subsequent reconstruction of the interaction map M (step 204). The feature extraction may be designed to identify those peaks in the projection signal S1, S2 that may originate from a touch object TO. The peaks may be identified by any suitable technique, although the following example will be directed to the use of thresholding/binarization, in which the signal values in the projections signals S1, S2 are mapped to a threshold.
It may be noted that the interaction map M may be reconstructed based on the extracted signal features, using any available technique. Reference is made to the techniques referenced in relation to
The temporal prioritization uses the trace history list to estimate the location and size of a previous trace in the current frame, i.e. to obtain a “current touch estimation”. Recalling that each signal value in the projection signal S1, S2 corresponds to a detection line with a known extension across the touch surface 1, each current touch estimation (e.g. location and size) may be mapped to portions of the projection signals S1, S2. Collectively, these portions thus correspond to a “search area” around the current touch estimation. The temporal prioritization operates to selectively apply a lower threshold level in these portions, so as to promote identification of touches in the search area(s).
This example of temporal prioritization reduces the probability of getting interruptions in a trace due to low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the sensor signals.
The temporal prioritization will now be further explained with reference to
It should be noted that the current touch estimation may be obtained by predicting the location and size of the touch based on the location history of the trace. Alternatively, the current touch estimation may be given by location and size of the trace, i.e. the location and size of the most recent touch in the trace. Further variants are, of course, possible.
2. Temporal Prioritization in Reconstruction (Step 204)
The reconstruction is specific to each type of projection system. With the ambition of keeping the present disclosure reasonably short, no specific examples are given on how to implement the temporal prioritization in the reconstruction. However, the skilled person should be able to readily re-design different known reconstruction algorithms to implement the principles of temporal prioritization based on the present disclosure. For example, the temporal prioritization may be implemented to define a search area around the above-mentioned “current touch estimation” and selectively operate the reconstruction algorithm to generate the interaction map M within each such search area.
3. Temporal Prioritization in Interaction Map Processing (Step 206/208)
In this example, the temporal prioritization is applied to correctly identify touches in the interaction map M, during either the signal enhancement (step 206) or the touch identification (208). As noted above, these steps 206, 208 may be merged into a single processing step, and will be treated as such in the following example, which is applicable for both projection systems and imaging systems.
The interaction map may be processed for identification of touches using any available blob detection technique. Below, two fairly straight-forward examples are given on how to incorporate the temporal prioritization into the interaction map processing.
In a first example, a threshold is applied on the interaction map to find touches. The threshold may originally be set at a (high) level so as to minimize the risk of identifying ghost touches. However, the temporal prioritization operates to selectively lower the threshold in the parts (“search areas”) of the interaction map where it is expected to find a touch that belongs to a trace. Thus, like in the example of
In a second example, the touch identification employs a sort of flood-fill clustering technique. First, local maxima are found in the interaction map. Then, clusters are created in the interaction map by selecting one of the local maxima and flooding to all areas that have lower parameter values (and so far are unclustered). The next cluster is then formed by selecting another local maximum and flooding, etc. To avoid small unclustered areas in the interaction map (e.g. caused by noise that makes the parameter values rise on small areas), the flooding may be designed to pass low “hills” (i.e. regions with slightly increased parameter values) in the falling direction from the selected local maximum. The end result of this clustering process is dependent on the ordering of the local maxima. Thus, the temporal prioritization may be implemented to start with local maxima found in or near the search areas.
4. Temporal Prioritization in Touch Filtering (Step 208)
As indicated above, further filtering techniques (“touch filtering”) may be applied on the identified touches to remove ghost touches and artifacts while retaining true touches. For instance, in many touch systems, artifacts may emerge in the interaction map near the location of a true touch. One example is projection systems that operate by propagating radiation above the touch surface, where the touch objects block the propagating radiation. Also in projection systems operating by TIR, weak artifacts may appear close to the touches. In either case, the artifact may be regarded as a form of “shadowed region” downstream of the touch, as seen in the propagation direction of the radiation (i.e. along the respective detection line). In many touch systems, weak ghost touches are prone to appear close to strong true touches.
To determine if a touch is an artifact/ghost touch or a true touch, a property of the touch in the interaction map may be compared to other touches in the interaction map. This process may involve comparing the parameter values of the interaction map to a threshold, which may be selected to enable discrimination between artifacts/ghost touches and true touches.
One implementation of the temporal prioritization is to let touches that are deemed to correspond to a trace in the trace history list be unaffected by the touch filtering, optionally provided that the trace has at least a certain age, e.g. 2-10 frames.
Below, further examples are given of touch filtering techniques and implementations of temporal prioritization in these.
A first example is given with reference to
A second example is given with reference to
It should be noted, that the actual shape of the sensitized 74, 82 and de-sensitized areas 72, 80 may be of any shape, such as polygonal, circular, or elliptical. For instance, the sensitized areas may be square/rectangles around the predicted positions since this may yield faster computation.
It should also be noted that the threshold in the sensitized 74, 82 and de-sensitized areas 72, 80 need not be the same over the whole area or between different areas.
5. Temporal Prioritization after Touch Identification (Step 208)
The temporal prioritization may also be applied when the touches have been identified and matched to corresponding traces in the trace history list (cf. steps 402-406). Specifically, it may be decided to only output touch data for touches that are matched to traces of at least a certain age. In other words, the process does not output any new touches and traces that only extend over a limited number of detection frames (“young traces”), but rather waits a few frames until more touches are matched to the new touches/young traces before letting the trace appear in the output. This filtering technique may be used to effectively reduce the number of ghost touches appearing due to, for instance, noise in the interaction map.
In some touch systems, there is a predefined maximum limit to the number of touches in the touch data to be output. The maximum limit may be set by inherent limitations of the touch system or the reconstruction, such that the limit represents the maximum number of touches that may be determined with sufficient accuracy. Alternatively, the maximum number is given by a design selection, e.g. to meet performance criteria such as computational speed or processing intensity in the decoding unit, or to match the number of touches to a requirement set by the application unit (7 in
When operating with a limited number of output touches, there may be an elevated risk that existing traces are interrupted by the appearance of a new touch. This risk may be contained by implementing the temporal prioritization to output the touches based on the age of their associated traces, starting with the oldest trace, until the maximum number of touches have been output. Any remaining traces may be kept in the trace history list, or they may be deleted.
It should be understood that temporal prioritization may be applied in more than one of the steps 202-208 of the process for touch data extraction. For example, two or more of the above examples may be applied in combination to further improve the performance of the process. Likewise, any of the described implementations and examples may serve to significantly improve the user experience in touch systems that operate with a limited number of output touches.
Other types of prioritization of touches may be applied, as a supplement or alternative to the temporal prioritization. Below, a “spatial prioritization” will be described with reference to
In step 901, the sensor signal(s) are processed for identification of touches. As noted above, the processing in step 901 may be designed to actively favor certain touches to be identified, namely touches that are deemed to fall within one or more priority areas on the touch surface 1. The location of the priority areas is determined based on a step 901′ of accessing a data structure denoted “priority area definition” that stores data on the location of the priority areas and optionally a priority value for each priority area. The data structure may be implemented as any collection of records.
In step 902, a set of identified touches (an “output set”) is determined for the current frame. Depending on implementation, the output set may include all touches identified in step 901 or a subset of these touches. As will be exemplified in further detail below, if the output set consists of a subset of the total number of identified touches in step 901, step 902 may include a step of actively favoring certain touches to be included in the output set, i.e. by making an active selection among the identified touches. Step 902 also involves determining touch data for the output set. Similarly to step 901, the step of actively favoring in step 902 may operate on data retrieved from the priority area definition by step 901′.
It should be understood that there is a complete analogy between the temporal prioritization and the spatial prioritization, and thus the above-described examples of temporal prioritization in relation to steps 202-208 are equally applicable to spatial prioritization.
The touch data extraction process of
One benefit of spatial prioritization is that a new touch that falls within the priority area may be detected even though there are several touches already present elsewhere on the touch surface. For example, consider the gaming table 1000 shown in
Many variants are possible within the general concept of spatial prioritization. For example, the interaction outside the priority area may be ignored when there is a touch detected within the priority area. It is also possible to have a set of priority areas with different priority, given by the priority value, whereby priority areas are processed in order of priority or the identified touches are included in the output set by order of priority. Thus, if the output set is limited to a predefined maximum number of touches, it is ensured that at least touches from certain priority areas are included therein. It is also possible that a priority area is associated (via the priority area definition) with a restriction on the number of touches to be included in the output set, and that different priority areas have different restrictions on the number of touches. It is also possible that a priority area is associated with a persistence requirement, which specifies that the touch must be detected within a certain priority area for a given number of frames before it is included in the output set. Such a requirement may e.g. be given to an emergency shutdown button displayed on the touch screen, to avoid that the system is shutdown by mistake, while ensuring that the system indeed reacts to a conscious touch on the emergency shutdown button.
It is to be understood that the priority value, the number restriction, and any other parameter of a priority area may change as a function of time. It is also to be understood that the priority areas may be static (i.e. fixed in relation to the touch surface) or change shape and/or location for different applications or depending on what is displayed on the touch surface. The priority areas may alternatively be determined by the user, e.g. through touch gestures in previous frames.
All of the above-described methods, processes and steps may be implemented by a decoding unit 6, e.g. as shown in
The invention has mainly been described above with reference to a few embodiments. However, as is readily appreciated by a person skilled in the art, other embodiments than the ones disclosed above are equally possible within the scope and spirit of the invention, which is defined and limited only by the appended patent claims.
For example, it is to be understood that the reference to maximum, minimum, raised value, lowered value, etc is given only for a specific implementation of signal values, parameter values, threshold values, etc, and is not to be construed as limiting. For example, a maximum is equivalent to a minimum given a different definition of the signal/parameter/threshold values.
Furthermore, it is of course possible to combine temporal and spatial prioritization. In one such example, which may e.g. be used when there is a maximum limit to the number of touches in the output set, different prioritization criteria are applied sequentially to actively decide on which touches are to be included in the output set within a detection frame, until the maximum limit is reached. In such an embodiment, a first criterion is applied to identify a first set of touches; and if the maximum limit is not reached, a second criterion is then applied to identify a second set of touches, etc. Such an embodiment need not combine spatial and temporal criteria, but may be based on different temporal criteria or different spatial criteria, optionally in combination with conventional criteria such as strength, area, shape of the touches.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1050724 | Jul 2010 | SE | national |
The present application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/807,159, filed Dec. 27, 2012, which is the National Stage under 35 U.S.C. §371 of International Application No. PCT/SE2011/050871, which has an international filing date of Jun. 29, 2011, and which claims priority to Swedish patent application No. 1050724-2, filed Jul. 1, 2010, and U.S. provisional application No. 61/344,337, filed Jul. 1, 2010, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7151530 | Roeber et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7465914 | Eliasson et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 20040136564 | Roeber et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20080012835 | Rimon et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080284925 | Han | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090174679 | Westerman | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20100026667 | Bernstein | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100073318 | Hu et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100141604 | Cai et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100309139 | Ng | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110074735 | Wassvik et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2077490 | Jul 2009 | EP |
| WO-03041006 | May 2003 | WO |
| WO-2006095320 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO-2008007372 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO-2009007704 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO-2010006882 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010006883 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010056177 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010064983 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| WO-2011049511 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| WO-2011049513 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| WO-2011139213 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report PCT/ISA/210. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160034099 A1 | Feb 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61344337 | Jul 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13807159 | US | |
| Child | 14881739 | US |
