Computing tools for managing sensitive data, such as data storage systems and their associated applications for modifying or accessing stored data, are often used to automatically process requests regarding how that particular data is handled. For instance, processing such requests may require these computing tools to search multiple data assets that use a variety of different data structures, storage formats, or software architectures in order to identify and action requests to access personal data, delete or otherwise modify personal data, receive information about the handling, storage, and/or processing of personal data, etc. The effectiveness of these computing tools can be degraded when resources (e.g., processing power, storage, network bandwidth) are used to service requests having extraneous information that is not useful in processing the request, especially when a request is received as an unstructured electronic communication such as an email or text message. For example, such extraneous unstructured data may not correspond to any particular data type recognized by the data storage system to which the request is directed. Devoting resources to processing such extraneous data can degrade system performance through the wasteful expenditure of resources, the provision of an inaccurate or incomplete response to the request, or both.
A method, according to various embodiments, may include: receiving, by computing hardware, a request for personal data associated with a data subject, the request comprising structured data and unstructured data; retrieving, by the computing hardware, a piece of the personal data by scanning a data source using the structured data; analyzing, by the computing hardware, the unstructured data to determine a first categorization for a first piece of the unstructured data and a second categorization for a second piece of the unstructured data; mapping, by the computing hardware, the first piece of the unstructured data to the piece of the personal data based on the first categorization and the personal data categorization; mapping, by the computing hardware, the second piece of the unstructured data to the piece of the personal data based on the second categorization and the personal data categorization; determining, by the computing hardware, that the first piece of the unstructured data matches the piece of the personal data; determining, by the computing hardware, that the second piece of the unstructured data does not match the piece of the personal data; in response to determining that the first piece of the unstructured data matches the piece of the personal data and the second piece of the unstructured data does not match the piece of the personal data, generating, by the computing hardware, redacted unstructured data comprising the first piece of the unstructured data and excluding the second piece of the unstructured data from the redacted unstructured data; and processing, by the computing hardware, the request using the redacted unstructured data.
In particular embodiments, the method further comprises determining an access method for the data source; and retrieving the piece of personal data comprises retrieving the piece of personal data from the data source using the access method. In particular embodiments, the method further comprises determining a first data type identifier for the data source, determining a second data type identifier for the structured data, and determining that the first data type identifier corresponds to the second data type identifier; and retrieving the piece of personal data comprises, in response to determining that the first data type identifier corresponds to the second data type identifier, retrieving the piece of personal data from the data source using the structured data. In particular embodiments, the piece of personal data is associated with a third data type identifier that is distinct from the first data type identifier and the second data type identifier. In particular embodiments, analyzing the unstructured data comprises: determining a first confidence score for the first categorization and a second confidence score for the second categorization; determining the first categorization for the first piece of the unstructured data based on the first confidence score; and determining the second categorization for the second piece of the unstructured data based on the first confidence score. In particular embodiments, processing the request comprises: determining that the redacted unstructured data represents a portion of the unstructured data greater than a threshold; and in response to determining that the redacted unstructured data represents the portion of the unstructured data greater than the threshold, suspending processing of the request and transmitting a notification that the redacted unstructured data represents a portion of the unstructured data greater than a threshold to a user. In particular embodiments, the method further comprises retrieving a second piece of the personal data by scanning a second data source using the piece of the personal data.
A system, according to various embodiments, may include: a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions; and processing hardware communicatively coupled to the non-transitory computer-readable medium, wherein the processing hardware is configured to execute the instructions and thereby perform operations comprising: receiving a request for personal data associated with a data subject, the request comprising unstructured data; retrieving a piece of the personal data stored on a data source using a personal data categorization associated with the piece of the personal data; determining a first categorization for a first piece of the unstructured data and a second categorization for a second piece of the unstructured data; mapping the first piece of the unstructured data to the piece of the personal data based on the first categorization and the personal data categorization; mapping the second piece of the unstructured data to the piece of the personal data based on the second categorization and the personal data categorization; determining that the first piece of the unstructured data corresponds to the piece of the personal data; determining that the second piece of the unstructured data does not correspond to the piece of the personal data; generating redacted unstructured data comprising the first piece of the unstructured data and excluding the second piece of the unstructured data from the redacted unstructured data; and transmitting the redacted unstructured data for use in processing the request.
In particular embodiments, determining that the first piece of the unstructured data corresponds to the piece of the personal data comprises: determining that the first piece of the unstructured data matches the piece of the personal data; determining a confidence score based on determining that the first piece of the unstructured data matches the piece of the personal data; determining that the confidence score is greater than a threshold value; and in response to determining that the confidence score is greater than the threshold value, determining that the first piece of the unstructured data corresponds to the piece of the personal data. In particular embodiments, determining that the second piece of the unstructured data does not correspond to the piece of the personal data comprises: determining that the second piece of the unstructured data matches the piece of the personal data; determining a confidence score for based on determining that the second piece of the unstructured data matches the piece of the personal data; determining that the confidence score is less than a threshold value; and in response to determining that the confidence score is less than the threshold value, determining that the second piece of the unstructured data does not correspond to the piece of the personal data. In particular embodiments, the operations further comprise retrieving a second piece of the personal data stored on a second data source by searching the second data source using the piece of the personal data. In particular embodiments, the operations further comprise: determining a third categorization for a third piece of the unstructured data; mapping the third piece of the unstructured data to a second piece of the personal data based on the third categorization and a second personal data categorization associated with the second piece of the personal data; and determining that the third piece of the unstructured data corresponds to the second piece of the personal data. In particular embodiments, the method further comprises determining an access method associated with the data source; and retrieving the piece of personal data comprises retrieving the piece of personal data from the data source using the access method. In particular embodiments, the request further comprises structured data; retrieving the piece of the personal data stored on the data source comprises searching the data source using the structured data; the structured data is associated with a first data type identifier; the piece of the personal data is associated with a second data type identifier; and the first data type identifier is distinct from the second data type identifier.
A non-transitory computer-readable medium, according to various embodiments, may store computer-executable instructions that, when executed by processing hardware, configure the processing hardware to perform operations comprising: receiving an electronic communication comprising a request for personal data associated with a data subject, the request comprising a data subject identifier and message data; retrieving, based on the data subject identifier, a piece of the personal data by scanning a data source using a personal data categorization for the piece of the personal data; analyzing the message data to determine a first categorization for a first piece of the message data and a second categorization for a second piece of the message data; mapping the first piece of the message data to the piece of the personal data based on the first categorization and the personal data categorization; mapping the second piece of the message data to the piece of the personal data based on the second categorization and the personal data categorization; determining that the first piece of the message data matches the piece of the personal data; determining that the second piece of the message data does not match the piece of the personal data; in response to determining that the first piece of the message data message data matches the piece of the personal data and the second piece of the message data does not match the piece of the personal data, generating redacted message data comprising the first piece of the message data and excluding the second piece of the message data from the redacted message data; and processing the request using the redacted message data.
In particular embodiments, the operations further comprise retrieving a second piece of the personal data by scanning a second data source using the piece of the personal data. In particular embodiments, the piece of the personal data is associated with a first data type identifier; the second piece of the personal data is associated with a second data type identifier; and the first data type identifier is distinct from the second data type identifier. In particular embodiments, the operations further comprise determining the second data source based on the first data type identifier. In particular embodiments, processing the request comprises: determining that the request was processed; based on determining that the request was processed, generating a graphical user interface for a browser application executed on a user device by configuring a first display element configured to display an indication that the request was successfully processed on the graphical user interface and excluding a second display element configured to display an indication that the request was not successfully processed from the graphical user interface; and transmitting an instruction to the browser application causing the browser application to present the graphical user interface on the user device. In particular embodiments, generating the graphical user interface comprises configuring a third display element configured to display the personal data on the graphical user interface.
Various embodiments of a system and method for automatically redacting unstructured data from a data subject access request are described below. In the course of this description, reference will be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:
Various embodiments now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be understood that the invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
In various embodiments, an unstructured data redaction system may be configured to dynamically determine whether one or more pieces of data included in a request for data associated with a particular data subject (e.g., a data subject access request (DSAR), a consumer rights request, etc.) are relevant to the request. The unstructured data redaction system may analyze the request using an identity graph representing personal data associated with the data subject to identify pieces of data in the request that are relevant to the request (e.g., associated with the data subject) and pieces of data that are not relevant to the request (e.g., not associated with the data subject). The unstructured data redaction system may then redact pieces of data that are not relevant and process the request using the relevant data.
To generate an identity graph that represents a data subject's personal data, an exemplary unstructured data redaction system may be configured to search various data sources using pieces of personal data associated with the data subject. The unstructured data redaction system may scan each of the data sources using the data subject's personal data to discover and correlate data type identifiers associated with the identified personal data with that data subject. Using this information, the unstructured data redaction system may generate an identity graph of the user's personal data. The identity graph may include a mapping of the personal data that is stored or otherwise handled at each data source and the means by which such personal data may be accessed at each data source. The identity graph may be stored as metadata along with the data type identifiers that are used with the particular data source to access the personal data stored on the data source. Such data type identifiers may indicate a classification and/or categorization for the personal data (e.g., telephone number, home address, postal code, name, etc.).
When a request for data associated with a data subject is received, the unstructured data redaction system may parse the information in the request to classify and/or categorize pieces of data in the request. The unstructured data redaction system may use the identity graph generated for the data subject's personal data to determine and/or retrieve (e.g., all available) personal data associated with the user and the associated data type identifiers for each piece of such personal data. The unstructured data redaction system may map the categorized request data to the personal data associated with the data subject based on the data type identifiers associated with such personal data. The unstructured data redaction system may then compare the categorized request data to the corresponding personal data to determine whether, or to what extent, each piece of the request data matches the known personal data for the user. The quality of a data match may be determined based on a correlation of the request data values and the known personal data values. In particular embodiments, the quality of a data match may be further determined based on a confidence score of the known personal data (e.g., retrieved from the data sources using the graph). The unstructured data redaction system may then discard or otherwise redact those pieces of data in the request that do not match (e.g., sufficiently match) known personal data associated with the data subject as determined using the identity graph. The unstructured data redaction system may then process the request using the unredacted request data.
An automatic unstructured data redaction module 140 may parse the information in the DSAR 111 to classify and/or categorize pieces of data in the DSAR 111. The automatic unstructured data redaction module 140 may use the identity graph 121 generated for the data subject's personal data to determine and/or retrieve (e.g., all available) the personal data associated with the user from the data sources 125 and the associated data type identifiers for each piece of such personal data. The automatic unstructured data redaction module 140 may map the categorized data from the DSAR 111 to the personal data associated with the data subject based on the data type identifiers associated with such personal data. The automatic unstructured data redaction module 140 may then compare the categorized data from the DSAR 111 to the corresponding personal data to determine whether, or to what extent, each piece of the categorized data from the DSAR 111 matches the known personal data for the user. As described in more detail herein, the quality of a data match may be taken into account in determining the particular pieces of the categorized data from the DSAR 111 are relevant. The automatic unstructured data redaction module 140 may then discard or otherwise redact those pieces of categorized data from the DSAR 111 that do not sufficiently match known personal data associated with the data subject as determined using the identity graph 121. The automatic unstructured data redaction module 140 may then provide the redacted DSAR 141 to a DSAR processing module 116 of the DSAR processing system 110 for processing using the unredacted request data.
As noted herein, an entity that handles (e.g., collects, receives, transmits, stores, processes, shares, etc.) sensitive and/or personal information associated with particular individuals (“personal data”) may be subject to various laws and regulations regarding the handling of such personal data. The applicable laws and regulations may vary based on the jurisdiction in which the entity is operating, the jurisdiction in which the individual associated with the personal data (“data subject”) is located, and/or the jurisdiction in which the personal data is handled. In many jurisdictions, an entity that handles personal data may be required to track the personal data they handle, by maintaining and/or readily generating information that indicates where the personal data is stored, how the personal data is processed, how the personal data is collected, etc. The entity may be required to have this information available (or have to ability to obtain this information) so that it can readily service data subject access requests (DSARs). As noted above, a DSAR may be a request from a data subject or other user to access personal data, delete personal data, receive information about the handling of personal data, etc. The entity may also, or instead, be required to have this information available (or have to ability to obtain this information) to comply with various aspects of applicable laws, regulations, and/or standards. The entity may also, or instead, want to be able to have this information available (or have to ability to obtain this information) to perform other functions, such as mine legacy systems for personal data (e.g., to ensure that legacy systems comply with current laws, regulations, and/or standards), create maps of where personal data may be stored, identify personal data that may need to be modified (deleted due to age or other factors, updated, supplemented, etc.), generate identity graphs representing personal data associated with a particular data subject, and/or perform unstructured data redaction functions in processing requests for data.
As the quantity of personal data increases over time, and as the number of systems that may possibly be handling personal data increases, determining how particular personal data has been handled (e.g., collected, received, transmitted, stored, processed, shared, etc.) across all of the potential systems that may have handled such personal data can be difficult. Discovering particular personal data cross multiple systems may become even more challenging when each of the systems may use its own, possibly unique, method of identifying the data subject associated with the particular personal data. Where different means of identifying a data subject are used across multiple systems, locating personal data associated with a particular data subject may not be feasible by simply using a name or other single piece of information associated with the particular data subject.
In various embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may connect to data sources that handle personal data for a particular data subject. Such data sources may include, but are not limited to, file repositories (structured and/or unstructured), data repositories, databases, enterprise applications, mobile applications (“apps”), cloud storage, local storage, and/or any other type of system that may be configured to handle personal data. The unstructured data redaction system may analyze some or all of the data stored on the data sources to determine whether such data includes pieces of personal data. If so, the unstructured data redaction system may label or otherwise store an indication that the personal data stored on the data sources as personal data. The unstructured data redaction system may then record the location of each of the pieces of personal data and/or the location of each of the data sources on which each of the pieces of personal data were discovered. The unstructured data redaction system may also record the manner of identification used to identify each of the pieces of personal data. The unstructured data redaction system may store any such information as metadata. This personal data information may then be used when the unstructured data redaction system needs to locate the particular personal data, for example, to respond to a request for data, generate an identity graph representing the particular personal data, and/or perform unstructured data redaction in processing a request for data. The unstructured data redaction system may also, or instead, use such personal data information to comply with various requirements (e.g., legal, regulatory, standards, etc.), to mine legacy systems for personal data, to create a map of where personal data may be stored, to identify personal data that may need to be modified, etc.
In analyzing the data on various data sources, the unstructured data redaction system may determine whether a particular piece of personal data on a first data source corresponds to particular piece of personal data on a second data source using various methods. For example, the unstructured data redaction system may compare the pieces of personal data (e.g., text string comparison) to determine if they are the same. In particular embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may compare the data type identifiers of the pieces of personal data to determine if they correspond. In particular embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may use artificial intelligence, big data methods, and/or neural networks to perform more sophisticated analysis to determine whether the particular pieces of personal data correspond to one another. For example, in some embodiments, two particular pieces of personal data may not have similar data type identifiers and/or may be stored in different formats but may actually both represent a same type of personal data (e.g., email address, telephone number, name, etc.). In such embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may use artificial intelligence, machine learning, neural networking, big data methods, natural language processing, contextual awareness, and/or continual learning (in any combination) to identify particular pieces of personal data and/or to determine whether and how particular pieces of personal data match up to one another. Once a piece of personal data is identified and/or matched with one or more other pieces of personal data, the unstructured data redaction system may store information reflecting the identification and/or matching in metadata for future use, including as described herein.
In a particular embodiment, the unstructured data redaction system may tag (e.g., in metadata) particular pieces of personal data with an indicator that indicates that the respective particular piece of personal data can be used to query its data source associated with that particular piece of personal data (e.g., a “queryable” tag). The unstructured data redaction system may also, or instead, tag (e.g., in metadata) fields associated with personal data storage at a particular data source with an indicator that indicates that the respective field may contain data that can be used to query that data source (e.g., a “queryable” tag). The unstructured data redaction system may then use such a tag in future attempts to locate particular personal data, for example, stored in a particular data source.
At Step 220, using the information included in the DSAR, such as personal data, the unstructured data redaction system may identify a particular data subject associated with the DSAR (who may or may not be the user that submitted the DSAR). At Step 230, the unstructured data redaction system may identify data sources that store personal data. In particular embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may identify data sources that store personal data generally and scan (e.g., all) of such data sources for personal data associated with the particular data subject as described in more detail below. Alternatively, the unstructured data redaction system may determine a subset of the data sources that store personal data generally for scanning based on, for example, information in the DSAR. For example, the unstructured data redaction system may determine that the DSAR is a request for a specific type of information (e.g., billing, financial, healthcare, etc.) and may determine a subset of data sources that store personal data associated with that specific type of information. In another example, the unstructured data redaction system may determine that the DSAR is a request from a specific type of data subject (e.g., customer, subscriber, member, etc.) and may determine a subset of data sources that store personal data associated with that specific type of data subject. The unstructured data redaction system may also, or instead, use any other means of determining a particular set of data sources for personal data scanning.
The unstructured data redaction system, according to this particular example, may have access to personal data associated with the particular data subject stored in two separate data sources. The first data source may be a customer database that stores the username of the particular data subject, along with the particular data subject's email address, first name, last name, social security number, postal code (e.g., zip code), and street address. The first data source may (e.g., only, or most efficiently) be searchable by email address. The second data source may be a certified drivers database that stores the particular data subject's driver's license record and social security number. The second data source may (e.g., only, or most efficiently) be searchable by social security number. In this example, if an initial search was executed against these two data sources using the information provided in the DSAR (the particular data subject's first name, last name, and email address), only the first data source would return results because only it may be searched using an email address, whereas the second data source may not be searchable using an email address.
In various embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may record metadata that correlates (or may be used to correlate) the data in the two data sources. For example, at Step 240, the unstructured data redaction system may scan the first data source using the email address provided by the DSAR. The unstructured data redaction system may determine to scan the first data source by determining that the first data source is searchable using personal data or other information that may be associated with the particular data subject that was included in the DSAR. The unstructured data redaction system may obtain or identify, in response to the scan, first additional personal data associated with the particular data subject stored on the first data source. For example, the unstructured data redaction system may obtain, via the scan of the first data source, the particular data subject's username, email address, first name, last name, social security number, postal code, and street address as stored on the first data source.
At Step 250, using a piece of personal data obtained from the first data source, such as the particular data subject's social security number, the unstructured data redaction system may scan the second data source to obtain or identify second additional personal data associated with the particular data subject stored on the second data source. For example, the unstructured data redaction system may obtain, via the scan of the second data source, the particular data subject's driver's license information (e.g., driver's license number).
At Step 260, the unstructured data redaction system may perform a check to determine whether the first additional personal data and the second additional personal data correspond to the particular data subject. For example, the unstructured data redaction system may compare the information received from each of the two data sources to verify that it is consistent and appears to correspond to the particular data subject (e.g., pieces of personal data of the same type have the same value or substantially similar values and/or are associated with pieces of personal data known to be associated with the particular data subject). At Step 270, the unstructured data redaction system may store a record (e.g., in metadata) of the particular personal data information (e.g., personal data, type of personal data) stored in each of the two data sources and how to access such information at each data source for the particular data subject.
In various embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may scan data sources that may store personal data and generate a graph for each data source. In this example, the unstructured data redaction system may scan each of the data sources 310, 320, and 330 to generate graphs 301, 302, and 303, respectively. Each of graphs 301, 302, and 303 may also be referred to as a node of the identity graph 300. Each such graph may include a mapping of the personal data that is stored or otherwise handled at the respective data source and the means by which such personal data may be accessed. The graphs may be stored as metadata along with the data type identifiers identifying the types of data that may be searched for in the particular data source to access the personal data stored on the data source. For example, if a data source has a “telephone number” data type identifier, telephone numbers may be searched in the data source to retrieve records that may include other types of data that are not searchable on that data source (e.g., search for a particular telephone number and if a match is found, data associated with the particular telephone number may be retrieved because it is linked to the telephone number, such as name, address, email, etc.).
In this example, the table 390 illustrates the metadata associated with each data source graph, or node, of identity graph 300. As can be seen in this figure, the data source 310 stores email, telephone numbers, addresses, and names, is searchable (e.g., queryable) using telephone numbers (e.g., telephone numbers may be searched on data source 310 to retrieve other data associated with a telephone number), and is accessible using the particular access method list for the data source 310 in the table 390. The access method listed in the table 390 may be a particular query that may be used to retrieve data from a data source or a reference (e.g., indicator, pointer, identifier, etc.) thereto. Alternatively, the access method listed in the table 390 may be a query template, a script, and/or any other means of accessing data at a data source or a reference (e.g., indicator, pointer, identifier, etc.) thereto.
As the unstructured data redaction system scans various data sources, the unstructured data redaction system may discover new data type identifiers for a particular data subject and/or personal data associated with the particular data subject. The unstructured data redaction system may use a dependency graph to indicate which data sources use data type identifiers that may be obtained from other data sources, thus creating a record of the interrelation of the various data sources. The unstructured data redaction system may store these new data type identifiers in metadata and determine whether there are any other data sources in scope (e.g., that use the same data type identifier). For those data sources that do not use the same data type identifier, the unstructured data redaction system may use another data type identifier determined from another data source to access the personal data for the particular data subject in those data sources.
For example, referring again to
As will be appreciated, the various disclosed embodiments may facilitate, based on a single piece of a particular data subject's data, the discovery of many types of data associated with a particular data subject in a variety of data sources that may each use different types of data type identifiers and different means of access. The unstructured data redaction system may use the other types of data discovered in a first data source using a first type of data to scan a second set of data sources that may not be searchable with the first type of data. The unstructured data redaction system may add a node to the identity graph for each data source in the second set of data sources in which the unstructured data redaction system identified data associated with a particular data subject. The unstructured data redaction system may then scan yet a third set of data sources using data discovered in the second set of data sources and add nodes for data sources in the second set of data sources to identity graph as data associated with the particular data subject is identified. The unstructured data redaction system may execute this process iteratively until the available data sources have all been scanned and a complete identity graph has been generated that can be used to efficiently perform other functions, such as automatically redacting unstructured data from a request for data.
In various embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may generate identity graphs according to the disclosed embodiments at any time. For example, the unstructured data redaction system may generate an identity graph for any new, or newly detected, data subject in response to the detection of the new data subject. Alternatively, or in addition, the unstructured data redaction system may generate an identity graph associated with a data subject's personal data in response to receiving a request from data associated with that data subject, for example, before processing the request. The unstructured data redaction system may also, or instead, modify any such graphs in response to an event (e.g., detection of personal data modification on a data source, detection of the additional and/or removal of a data source, etc.) or on a recurring (e.g., periodic) basis. The unstructured data redaction system may also, or instead, delete any such graphs in response to an event (e.g., detection of the removal of personal data from a data source, detection of the removal of data sources associated with the graph, etc.), or in response to determining that the graph is no longer in use (e.g., unused for at least a pre-determined period of time).
As described herein, an entity that handles personal data associated with a particular data subject may receive data requests (e.g., DSARs) from, or on behalf of, the data subject. Each such request may be a request to access, delete, retrieve, and/or modify personal data associated with the data subject. Each such request may also, or instead, be a request for information about the manner in which the entity handles, stores, and/or processes the personal data associated with the data subject.
Often such requests may take the form of, or may be provided via, electronic communications such as emails, chats, texts, or documents containing unstructured data (e.g., data for which data types and/or associations are not indicated). Such requests may include information that is not relevant to or useful in processing the request. Such requests may also, or instead, include information that is associated with personal data of users other than the data subject associated with the request. It can be challenging to separate the useful (e.g., for purposes of processing the request) information in a request from information that is not useful. For example, an email associated with a request may include names, telephone numbers, email addresses, and/or home addresses of several people (e.g., in an email string) while the request is related to only the personal data associated with a single particular data subject. The disclosed unstructured data redaction systems and methods provide means of automatically and efficiently redacting such extraneous information from a request while retaining the relevant personal data associated with a particular data subject for processing the request.
In various embodiments, and as described in more detail above, the unstructured data redaction system may be configured to generate an identity graph for a data subject's personal data using pieces of the personal data to search across various data sources. The unstructured data redaction system may use pieces of personal data associated with a data subject to search across various data sources to discover and correlate associated data type identifiers with the particular data subject. For example, the unstructured data redaction system may use a known piece of information for a data subject (e.g., a first name, a last name, an account number, an email address, a telephone number, a username, an IP address, etc.) to identify other pieces of information from a data source associated with that known piece of information. The unstructured data redaction system may then correlate those identified other pieces of information with the data subject and store (e.g., in metadata) such correlation information to generate an identity graph for the data subject. The identity graph may include a mapping of the personal data (e.g., types of personal data, categories of personal data, etc.) that is stored or otherwise handled at each data source and the means by which such personal data may be accessed. The graph may be stored as metadata including the data type identifiers that are used with the particular data source to access the types of personal data stored on the data source for the data subject. Such data type identifiers may indicate a classification or category for the data (e.g., telephone number, home address, postal code, name, etc.). The graph can then be used to retrieve any information identified in the graph from the data sources as needed, for example to process a request for data and/or to redact extraneous data from such a request as described herein.
In response to receiving a request for data (e.g., DSAR, consumer rights request, etc.) from, or on behalf of, a particular data subject, the unstructured data redaction system may use an identity graph associated with the particular data subject's personal data to determine and/or retrieve (e.g., all or any portion of) the available personal data associated with the data subject.
Further in response to receiving the data request, the unstructured data redaction system may analyze the information in the request to classify and/or categorize each piece of information in the request. In classifying and/or categorizing each such piece of information, the unstructured data redaction system may assign each piece of information a data type identifier, for example, selected from the data type identifiers that may potentially be used to categorize pieces of personal data identified in identity graphs as described herein. In particular embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may use natural language processing (NLP), machine learning, neural networks, and/or any other advanced processing techniques to identify and categorize information in a request. The unstructured data redaction system may also assign a confidence score to the categorization of each piece of information in a request using various techniques (e.g., 70% confident a particular piece of information is a postal code, 80% confident a particular piece of information is a telephone number, etc.). Categorizations may be associated with a type of information determined for each piece of information in the request (e.g., email, address, first name, last name, postal code, telephone number, etc.).
After the request information has been categorized and the data subject's personal data has been retrieved using an identity graph, the unstructured data redaction system may map pieces of the categorized request information to pieces of the data subject's personal data based on the data type identifiers and categories associated with each such piece of information. For example, the unstructured data redaction system may determine that a piece of request information appears to be a telephone number and may therefore categorize that piece of request information as a “telephone number.” The unstructured data redaction system may then match that piece of request information to a retrieved piece of personal data having a “telephone number” data type identifier as indicated in the data subject's graph to determine a data pairing that may then be compared as described below.
The unstructured data redaction system may then determine, for each pairing of a piece of request data with a piece of retrieved personal data that have matching categories/data type identifiers, whether the piece of request data matches the piece of retrieved personal data. For example, where the unstructured data redaction system has determined a pairing of a piece of request information categorized as a “telephone number” with a retrieved piece of personal data having a “telephone number” data type identifier, the unstructured data redaction system may then determine whether the telephone numbers represented by these pieces of information are the same telephone number. Various techniques may be used to determine whether the pieces of data match, including a strict character string match, NLP-based matching, and/or any other data matching techniques or combinations thereof. The unstructured data redaction system may determine that those pieces of information from the request that match a piece of personal data associated with the data subject are relevant to the request and may be used in processing the request.
The unstructured data redaction system may determine whether the data associated with each piece of information in a pairing is a match based on the correlation of the data values in combination with other criteria. For example, the unstructured data redaction system may consider a confidence score for the piece of information that was detected by analyzing the request and/or for the piece of information retrieved from a data source using an identity graph. Other criteria may also be used. The unstructured data redaction system may be configured to calculate a match score for each pairing (e.g., 100% match, 75% match, etc.) and determine that a pairing constitutes a match when the respective match score meets or exceeds a threshold (e.g., 70%, 80% etc.).
In response to determining whether each piece of information in a request is relevant, the unstructured data redaction system may then discard, redact, or otherwise ignore the pieces of request information that do not match personal data associated with the data subject. The unstructured data redaction system may then process the request using the unredacted data included in the request, and, in particular embodiments, data retrieved using identity graphs as described herein.
At Step 430, the unstructured data redaction system may use the identity graph associated with the particular data subject's personal data to determine and/or retrieve (e.g., all or any portion of) the available personal data associated with the data subject from the data sources represented in the identity graph, for example, using the access methods and/or data type identifiers indicated for each data source in its respective identity graph node. In various embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may use the structured data from the request to search those data sources that are indicated in the identity graph as being searchable using the type of data associated with the structured data. For example, when the request includes a structured telephone number data field, the unstructured data redaction system may use the value of this field to search a first data source that is searchable by telephone number. Using the results of this initial search (e.g., an email address), the unstructured data redaction system may then search a second data source that is searchable by email address but not telephone number. If there is a third data source that is not searchable by either telephone number or email address, the unstructured data redaction system may use the results of searches of the first and second data sources to further search this third data source, using the results of that search to search subsequent data sources and so on, until the available personal data associated with the data subject has been retrieved from the data sources indicated in the identity graph.
At Step 440, the unstructured data redaction system may analyze the unstructured data in the request to assign a category and/or classification to each piece of information in the unstructured data portion of the request. In classifying and/or categorizing each such piece of information, the unstructured data redaction system may assign each piece of information a data type identifier, for example, selected from the identifiers of types of personal data that may be used by the unstructured data redaction system to categorize pieces of personal data (e.g., as identified in identity graphs as described herein). Examples of such data type identifiers include but are not limited to, email, address, first name, last name, postal code, telephone number, etc. In particular embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may use data type identifiers that indicate that a piece of unstructured data is irrelevant, for example, the conversational text within a request. In other embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may assign a data type identifier associated with a particular type of personal data to every piece of unstructured data and rely on a low confidence score to indicate that a particular piece of unstructured data is irrelevant (e.g., not a good match for a data type identifier, such as conversational text). As noted, the unstructured data redaction system may use NLP, machine learning, neural networks, and/or any other advanced processing techniques to identify and categorize each piece of information in the unstructured data portion of the request.
At Step 450, the unstructured data redaction system may determine a confidence score for each categorization and/or classification assigned to each piece of information in the unstructured data portion of the request. The unstructured data redaction system may use any of various techniques to determine a confidence score, such as machine learning and NLP, in particular embodiments, integrating human feedback as described in more detail below. In particular embodiments, a confidence score may have a (e.g., numerical) value that may be compared to a threshold value (e.g., 70% confident a particular piece of information is a postal code, 80% confident a particular piece of information is a telephone number, 50% confident a particular piece of information is message text, etc.). In particular embodiments, a confidence score may indicate that a piece of unstructured data is irrelevant regardless of the categorization and/or classification. For example, the unstructured data redaction system may classify conversational text within a request as “names” because it is made up of character strings, but because such text has no other attributes of the “names” classification, the unstructured data redaction system may assign a very low or zero confidence score to such unstructured data.
At Step 460, the unstructured data redaction system may map eligible pieces of the categorized request information to pieces of the data subject's personal data based on the data type identifiers and categories associated with each such piece of information. The unstructured data redaction system may discard or ignore those pieces of the request information that remain uncategorized, have too low a confidence score, or are categorized as being data ineligible for mapping to the data subject's personal data. For example, the unstructured data redaction system may have determined that a piece of request information appears to be a telephone number and may have therefore categorized that piece of request information as a “telephone number.” The unstructured data redaction system may then match that piece of request information to a retrieved piece of personal data having a “telephone number” data type identifier (e.g., as indicated in the data subject's identity graph) to determine a data pairing that may then be compared as described below.
At Step 470, the unstructured data redaction system may compare each piece of categorized unstructured data from the request to the piece of retrieved personal data to which it is mapped to determine whether the pieces of data match. For example, where the unstructured data redaction system has paired a piece of unstructured data categorized as a “telephone number” with a retrieved piece of personal data having a “telephone number” data type identifier, the unstructured data redaction system may then determine whether the telephone numbers represented by these pieces of information are the same telephone number. As noted above, various techniques may be used to determine whether the pieces of data match.
In particular embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may use determine a confidence or match score for a match and determine whether the pieces of data in a pair match based on the score. For example, the unstructured data redaction system may compare a confidence or match score for a data pairing (e.g., 50% 75%, 90%, etc.) against a threshold confidence score (e.g., 75%, 85%, etc.) and determine that the data in the pairing matches if the confidence score meets or exceeds the threshold. The unstructured data redaction system may also, or instead, take into account a confidence score for one or both pieces of data in a pairing (e.g., a confidence score for the categorization of a piece of unstructured data and/or a confidence score for the categorization of a piece of personal data retrieved from a data source using an identity graph). Other criteria may also be used.
At Step 480, the unstructured data redaction system may discard, redact, or otherwise ignore the pieces of unstructured data from the request that do not match personal data associated with the data subject and are therefore irrelevant to the request. Further at Step 480, the unstructured data redaction system may then process the request using the unredacted unstructured data included in the request, and, in particular embodiments, data retrieved using identity graphs as described herein.
A simplified example illustrating the operation of an unstructured data redaction system with reference to various exemplary data structures will now be described.
At operation 502, the unstructured data redaction system may map pieces of the categorized unstructured data 520 to pieces of the retrieved personal data 530 based on the respective categorizations of each piece of data (e.g., as described herein). For example, as shown in this figure, the data categorized as telephone numbers in the categorized unstructured data 520 is mapped to the data categorized as a telephone number in the retrieved personal data 530, the data categorized as names in the categorized unstructured data 520 is mapped to the data categorized as a name in the retrieved personal data 530, and the data categorized as email addresses in the categorized unstructured data 520 is mapped to the data categorized as an email address in the retrieved personal data 530.
At operation 503, the unstructured data redaction system determines whether each piece of the categorized unstructured data 520 match the piece of retrieved personal data 530 to which it is mapped and redacts those pieces of the categorized unstructured data 520 that do not match a piece of retrieved personal data 530 to generate the redacted unstructured data 540. The unstructured data redaction system generates the relevant unstructured data 550 using the redacted unstructured data 540 and provides the relevant unstructured data 550 use in processing the DSAR 510 at operation 504.
In various embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may be configured to perform functions that improve the performance and accuracy of categorization and/or classification determinations and the matching process. In particular embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may generate a graphical user interface configured with presentation elements that present categorization, classification, and/or matching data to allow the user to review the results of the processes that generated this data. The unstructured data redaction system may further configure user input elements on the graphical user interface to allow a user or provide input regarding the presented data. Alternatively, or in addition, the unstructured data redaction system may configure navigation elements configured to trigger the generation of a subsequent graphical user interface that may allow the user to provide input regarding the presented data. Such interfaces may improve request data relevance determinations by gathering feedback that the unstructured data redaction system may use to improve the categorization and/or classification of data received in requests and the matching process.
In a particular example, the unstructured data redaction system may present a graphical user interface to the user indicating the pairings of potential matches that the unstructured data redaction system has identified and associated confidence levels for each pairing. In particular embodiments, the confidence levels that may be used include, but are not limited to: (1) a confidence level that a piece of information identified from a request is a particular type of information; (2) a confidence level that a piece of information retrieved from a data source using an identity graph is associated with a particular data subject; and (3) a confidence level that a piece of information identified from a request matches a piece of information retrieved from a data source using an identity graph. In particular embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may present all such pairings to the user, while in other embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may present only pairings that are associated with a confidence below or above a certain threshold. The unstructured data redaction system may prompt the user for input via a user input control element configured on the graphical user interface indicating whether such potential categorizations and/or matches are accurate. The unstructured data redaction system may use such information to further refine the various disclosed embodiments.
In various embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may automatically use information from those matches having a confidence level above a certain threshold in processing the request. Also, or instead, the unstructured data redaction system may automatically exclude information from those pairings having a confidence level below a certain threshold from use in processing the request.
In various embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may generate notifications when particular outlier or unusual events occur in analyzing a request. For example, if the unstructured data redaction system determines that the redacted portion of unstructured data in a request exceeds a certain threshold percentage of the total amount of unstructured data or the total amount of request content, the unstructured data redaction system may not process that request at all. In such cases, the unstructured data redaction system may flag the request and/or transmit the request to a user for manual review before processing. In such cases the unstructured data redaction system may also, or instead, inform the data subject (or the user submitting the request on behalf of the data subject) that the request was not processed. For example, a request with 99% of its content redacted may indicate a problematic request, as opposed to a request having only 20% of its content redacted.
An entity that handles (e.g., collects, receives, transmits, stores, processes, shares, and/or the like) sensitive and/or personal information associated with particular individuals (e.g., personally identifiable information (PII) data, sensitive data, personal data, etc.) may receive data requests from users for information relating to personal data associated with a data subject and/or requests to modify and/or delete such personal data, for example, as a data subject access request (DSAR). Because an entity may have many systems of many different types that handle personal data in various ways, processing a data request may require significant resources to locate, retrieve, and/or modify personal data based on a data request. Processing a data request becomes even more challenging when it includes extraneous data that is unrelated to the request. Such extraneous data reduces the entity's ability to efficiently process data requests by utilizing resources for processing data unnecessarily. Moreover, requests with such extraneous data may be processed improperly due to the potential confusion of relevant data in the request with irrelevant data unrelated to the request. For example, a request may include two or three unrelated telephone numbers along with a telephone number of the data subject associated with the request. This is especially an issue with data requests that include unstructured data (e.g., data for which data types and/or associations are not indicated, such as email body text, text message content, etc.), which is increasingly common as users gravitate towards simpler methods of submitting data requests. In conventional systems, such extraneous data is either processed, resulting in inefficient an unnecessary usage of system resources, or manually redacted in a time-consuming and human resource-intensive operation.
Accordingly, various embodiments of the present disclosure overcome many of the technical challenges associated with processing data requests that include unstructured data. More particularly, various embodiments of the present disclosure include implementing a limited set of rules in a process for automatically redacting irrelevant data from unstructured data included in a data request before processing the request. The various embodiments of the disclosure are directed to a computational framework configured for categorizing unstructured data in a data request, comparing the unstructured data to known personal data based on the data type, and redacting that unstructured data that does not match personal data of the same data type. Specifically, the unstructured data redaction system discovers personal data as described herein to locate (e.g., all) available personal data across various data sources and identify a data type for each such piece of data. The unstructured data redaction system generates an identity graph representing the personal data, with each node of the identity graph indicating a particular data source, the types of personal data stored at that data source, the method of accessing that data source, and the data type identifier that may be used at that data source. In response to receiving or detecting a request for data that includes unstructured data, the unstructured data redaction system analyzes the unstructured data to determine categorizations for each piece of such data. The unstructured data redaction system retrieves known personal data using the identity graph and compares the categorized pieces of unstructured data to the pieces of known personal data having the same categorization to determine whether the pieces match. Those pieces of unstructured data that match personal data are permitted to remain in the request while the pieces that do not match personal data are redacted from the request. The request including only unredacted unstructured data can then be processes much more efficiently than a request that would have included all the unstructured data. By automatically redacting irrelevant unstructured data from a data request, the various embodiments represent a significant improvement to existing and conventional processes for addressing data requests that include extraneous data.
Accordingly, various embodiments of the disclosure provided herein are more effective, efficient, accurate, and faster in determining the appropriate information to retain in a data request when the original request includes unstructured data. The various embodiments of the disclosure provided herein provide improved means of redacting irrelevant unstructured data from a data request by locating a personal data across multiple data sources using a generated identity graph, categorizing unstructured data in a data request, and redacting irrelevant unstructured data from the data request based on a comparison of the categorized unstructured data to the personal data. This is especially advantageous when an entity receives many data requests in a variety of forms from many users and data subjects. In facilitating the efficient redaction of irrelevant unstructured data from data requests, the various embodiments of the present disclosure make major technical contributions to improving the computational efficiency and reliability of various privacy management systems and procedures for data request processing. This in turn translates to more computationally efficient software systems.
As will be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant field, data processing systems and methods for automatically redacting unstructured data from a data subject access request, according to various embodiments described herein, may be, for example, embodied as a computer system, a method, or a computer program product. Accordingly, various embodiments may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, particular embodiments may take the form of a computer program product stored on a computer-readable storage medium having computer-readable instructions (e.g., software) embodied in the storage medium. Various embodiments may take the form of web, mobile, and/or wearable computer-implemented computer software. Any suitable computer-readable storage medium may be utilized including, for example, hard disks, compact disks, DVDs, optical storage devices, and/or magnetic storage devices.
It should be understood that each step described herein as being executed by an unstructured data redaction system or systems (and/or other steps described herein), and any combinations of such steps, may be implemented by a computer executing computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be loaded onto a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to create means for implementing the various steps described herein.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory that may direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture that is configured for implementing the function specified in the flowchart step or steps. The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions that execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart step or steps.
Accordingly, steps of the block diagrams and flowchart illustrations support combinations of mechanisms for performing the specified functions, combinations of steps for performing the specified functions, and program instructions for performing the specified functions. It should also be understood that each step, and combinations of such steps, may be implemented by special-purpose hardware-based computer systems that perform the specified functions or steps, or combinations of special purpose hardware and other hardware executing appropriate computer instructions.
The computer networks 610 may include any of a variety of types of wired and/or wireless computer networks and any combination therefore, such as the Internet, a private intranet, a public switched telephone network (PSTN), or any other type of network. The communication link between the server 620, one or more client computing devices 640, 650, 660, 670, 680, 690, and storage device 630 may be, for example, implemented via a Local Area Network (LAN), a Wide Area Network (WAN), and/or via the Internet.
The exemplary computer 700 may include a processor 702, a main memory 704 (e.g., read-only memory (ROM), flash memory, dynamic random access memory (DRAM) such as synchronous DRAM (SDRAM) or Rambus DRAM (RDRAM), etc.), a static memory 706 (e.g., flash memory, static random access memory (SRAM), etc.), and/or a data storage device 718, which communicate with each other via a bus 732.
The processor 702 represents one or more general-purpose processing devices such as a microprocessor, a central processing unit, or the like. More particularly, the processor 702 may be a complex instruction set computing (CISC) microprocessor, a reduced instruction set computing (RISC) microprocessor, a very long instruction word (VLIW) microprocessor, or a processor or processors implementing other instruction sets and/or any combination of instruction sets. The processor 702 may also be one or more special-purpose processing devices such as an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA), a digital signal processor (DSP), network processor, or the like. The processor 702 may be configured to execute processing logic 726 for performing various operations and steps discussed herein.
The computer 700 may further include a network interface device 708. The computer 700 also may include a video display unit 710 (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a cathode ray tube (CRT)), an alphanumeric input device 712 (e.g., a keyboard), a cursor control device 714 (e.g., a mouse), and/or a signal generation device 716 (e.g., a speaker). The data storage device 718 may include a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium 730 (also known as a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium or a non-transitory computer-readable medium) on which may be stored one or more sets of instructions 722 (e.g., software, software modules) embodying any one or more of the methodologies and/or functions described herein. The instructions 722 may also reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 704 and/or within the processor 702 during execution thereof by computer 700, the main memory 704 and the processor 702 also constituting computer-accessible storage media. The instructions 722 may further be transmitted or received over a network 610 via network interface device 708.
While the computer-readable storage medium 730 is shown in an exemplary embodiment to be a single medium, the terms “computer-readable storage medium” and “machine-accessible storage medium” should be understood to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the sets of instructions. The term “computer-readable storage medium” should also be understood to include any medium or media that is capable of storing, encoding, and/or carrying a set of instructions for execution by a computer and that cause a computer to perform any one or more of the methodologies of described herein. The term “computer-readable storage medium” should accordingly be understood to include, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, optical and magnetic media, etc.
According to various embodiments, the processes and logic flows described in this specification may be performed by a system (e.g., system 600) that includes, but is not limited to, one or more programmable processors (e.g., processor 702) executing one or more computer program modules to perform functions by operating on input data and generating output, thereby tying the process to a particular machine (e.g., a machine programmed to perform the processes described herein). This includes processors located in one or more of client computers (e.g., client computing devices 640, 650, 660, 670, 680, 690 of
In various embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system uses advanced processing techniques to locate personal data, generate identity graphs, perform unstructured data redaction, and/or implement any of the various aspects of the disclosed unstructured data redaction systems and methods. In particular embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may determine a type of one or more pieces of personal data that are stored in one or more data sources using advanced processing techniques that may include artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence, machine learning, neural networking, big data methods, natural language processing, contextual awareness, and/or continual learning (in any combination). In particular embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may match one or more pieces of personal data that are stored in one or more data sources with one or more other pieces of personal data that are stored in one or more other data sources using any one or more of these advanced processing techniques and/or any combination thereof. In various embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may use any such advanced processing techniques to mine various data sources for personal data stored therein to determine data types and relationships. In various embodiments, the unstructured data redaction system may use any such advanced processing techniques to perform any of the processing (e.g., execute any of the modules) described herein to locate, identify, retrieve, modify, and/or perform any other functions related to personal data, including generating identity graphs and performing unstructured data redaction.
In particular embodiments, one or more neural networks may be used to implement any of the advanced processing techniques described herein. A neural network, according to various embodiments, may include a plurality of nodes that mimic the operation of the human brain, a training mechanism that analyzes supplied information, and/or a personal data location engine for performing any one or more of the functions involving personal data as described herein, including, but not limited to, generating identity graphs and performing unstructured data redaction. The neural network may also perform any of the processing (e.g., execute any of the modules) described herein to locate, identify, retrieve, modify, and/or perform any other functions on personal data. In various embodiments, each of the nodes may include one or more weighted input connections, one or more transfer functions that combine the inputs, and one or more output connections. In particular embodiments, the neural network is a variational autoencoder (AE) neural network, a denoising AE neural network, any other suitable neural network, or any combination thereof.
Although embodiments above are described in reference to various automatic unstructured data redaction and personal data discovery systems, it should be understood that various aspects of the unstructured data redaction system described above may be applicable to other types of systems, in general.
While this specification contains many specific embodiment details, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of any embodiment or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features that may be specific to particular embodiments of particular inventions. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate embodiments may also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment may also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable sub-combination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination may in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or variation of a sub-combination.
Similarly, while operations are described in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order described or in sequential order, or that all described operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. In certain circumstances, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. Moreover, the separation of various system components in the embodiments described above should not be understood as requiring such separation in all embodiments, and it should be understood that the described program components and systems may generally be integrated together in a single software product or packaged into multiple software products.
Many modifications and other embodiments will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which this disclosure pertains having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for the purposes of limitation.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/061,894, filed Aug. 6, 2020, the contents of which are hereby incorporated herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4536866 | Jerome et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4574350 | Starr | Mar 1986 | A |
5193162 | Bordsen et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5276735 | Boebert et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5329447 | Leedom, Jr. | Jul 1994 | A |
5404299 | Tsurubayashi et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5535393 | Reeve et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5560005 | Hoover et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5668986 | Nilsen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5710917 | Musa et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5761529 | Raji | Jun 1998 | A |
5764906 | Edelstein et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5872973 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5913041 | Ramanathan et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913214 | Madnick et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6016394 | Walker | Jan 2000 | A |
6122627 | Carey et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6148297 | Swor et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6148342 | Ho | Nov 2000 | A |
6240416 | Immon et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243816 | Fang et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253203 | Oflaherty et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263335 | Paik et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272631 | Thomlinson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275824 | Oflaherty et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282548 | Burner et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6330562 | Boden et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6363488 | Ginter et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374237 | Reese | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374252 | Althoff et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6408336 | Schneider et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6427230 | Goiffon et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442688 | Moses et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446120 | Dantressangle | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463488 | San Juan | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484149 | Jammes et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484180 | Lyons et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6516314 | Birkler et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6516337 | Tripp et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519571 | Guheen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6574631 | Subramanian et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6591272 | Williams | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601233 | Underwood | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606744 | Mikurak | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611812 | Hurtado et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6625602 | Meredith et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629081 | Cornelius et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633878 | Underwood | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6662192 | Rebane | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6662357 | Bowman-Amuah | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6697824 | Bowman-Amuah | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6699042 | Smith et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6701314 | Conover et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721713 | Guheen et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6725200 | Rost | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732109 | Lindberg et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6754665 | Futagami et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6755344 | Mollett et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757685 | Raffaele et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757888 | Knutson et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6816944 | Peng | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826693 | Yoshida et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6850252 | Hoffberg | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6886101 | Glazer et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6901346 | Tracy et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6904417 | Clayton et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6909897 | Kikuchi | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6925443 | Baggett, Jr. et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938041 | Brandow et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6956845 | Baker et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6978270 | Carty et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6980927 | Tracy et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6980987 | Kaminer | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6983221 | Tracy et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6985887 | Sunstein et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6990454 | McIntosh | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993448 | Tracy et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993495 | Smith, Jr. et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996807 | Vardi et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003560 | Mullen et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003662 | Genty et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7013290 | Ananian | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7017105 | Flanagin et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023979 | Wu et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7039594 | Gersting | May 2006 | B1 |
7039654 | Eder | May 2006 | B1 |
7047517 | Brown et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7051036 | Rosnow et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7051038 | Yeh et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7058970 | Shaw | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069427 | Adler et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7076558 | Dunn | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7093200 | Schreiber et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7095854 | Ginter et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7100195 | Underwood | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7120800 | Ginter et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7124101 | Mikurak | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7124107 | Pishevar et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7127705 | Christfort et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127741 | Bandini et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133845 | Ginter et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7139999 | Bowman-Amuah | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143091 | Charnock et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7149698 | Guheen et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7165041 | Guheen et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7167842 | Josephson, II et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7167844 | Leong et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7171379 | Menninger et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7181438 | Szabo | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7203929 | Vinodkrishnan et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7213233 | Vinodkrishnan et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7216340 | Vinodkrishnan et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7219066 | Parks et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7223234 | Stupp et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225460 | Barzilai et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7234065 | Breslin et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7247625 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7251624 | Lee et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7260830 | Sugimoto | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7266566 | Kennaley et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7272818 | Ishimitsu et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7275063 | Horn | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7281020 | Fine | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7284232 | Bates et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7284271 | Lucovsky et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7287280 | Young | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7290275 | Baudoin et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7293119 | Beale | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7299299 | Hollenbeck et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7302569 | Betz et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7313575 | Carr et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313699 | Koga | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313825 | Redlich et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7315826 | Guheen et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7315849 | Bakalash et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7322047 | Redlich et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7330850 | Seibel et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7340447 | Ghatare | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7340776 | Zobel et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7343434 | Kapoor et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346518 | Frank et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7353204 | Liu | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7356559 | Jacobs et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7367014 | Griffin | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7370025 | Pandit | May 2008 | B1 |
7376835 | Olkin et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7380120 | Garcia | May 2008 | B1 |
7382903 | Ray | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7383570 | Pinkas et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7391854 | Salonen et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7398393 | Mont et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7401235 | Mowers et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7403942 | Bayliss | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7409354 | Putnam et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7412402 | Cooper | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7424680 | Carpenter | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7428546 | Nori et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7430585 | Sibert | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7454457 | Lowery et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7454508 | Mathew et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7478157 | Bohrer et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7480755 | Herrell et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7487170 | Stevens | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7493282 | Manly et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7512987 | Williams | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7516882 | Cucinotta | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7523053 | Pudhukottai et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7529836 | Bolen | May 2009 | B1 |
7548968 | Bura et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7552480 | Voss | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7562339 | Racca et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7565685 | Ross et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7567541 | Karimi et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7584505 | Mondri et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7584508 | Kashchenko et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7587749 | Leser et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7590705 | Mathew et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7590972 | Axelrod et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7603356 | Schran et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7606783 | Carter | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7606790 | Levy | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7607120 | Sanyal et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7613700 | Lobo et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7617136 | Lessing et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7617167 | Griffis et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7620644 | Cote et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7627666 | Degiulio et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7630874 | Fables et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7630998 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7636742 | Olavarrieta et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7640322 | Wendkos et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7650497 | Thornton et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7653592 | Flaxman et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7657476 | Barney | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7657694 | Mansell et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7665073 | Meijer et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7665125 | Heard et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7668947 | Hutchinson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7673282 | Amaru et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7676034 | Wu et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7681034 | Lee et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7681140 | Ebert | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685561 | Deem et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685577 | Pace et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7693593 | Ishibashi et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7698398 | Lai | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7702639 | Stanley et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707224 | Chastagnol et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7712029 | Ferreira et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7716242 | Pae et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7725474 | Tamai et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7725875 | Waldrep | May 2010 | B2 |
7729940 | Harvey et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7730142 | Levasseur et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752124 | Green et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756826 | Bots et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756987 | Wang et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7761586 | Olenick et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7774745 | Fildebrandt et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7788212 | Beckmann et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7788222 | Shah et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7788632 | Kuester et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7788726 | Teixeira | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7801758 | Gracie et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7801826 | Labrou et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7801912 | Ransil et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7802305 | Leeds | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7805349 | Yu et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7805451 | Hosokawa | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7813947 | Deangelis et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7822620 | Dixon et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7827523 | Ahmed et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7844640 | Bender et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7849143 | Vuong | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7853468 | Callahan et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7853470 | Sonnleithner et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7853925 | Kemmler | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7860816 | Fokoue-Nkoutche et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7870540 | Zare et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7870608 | Shraim et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873541 | Klar et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7877327 | Gwiazda et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7877812 | Koved et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7885841 | King | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7890461 | Oeda et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7895260 | Archer et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7904478 | Yu et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7904487 | Ghatare | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7917888 | Chong et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7917963 | Goyal et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7921152 | Ashley et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930197 | Ozzie et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930753 | Mellinger et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7953725 | Burris et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7954150 | Croft et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7958087 | Blumenau | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7958494 | Chaar et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7962900 | Barraclough et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7966310 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7966599 | Malasky et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7966663 | Strickland et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7974992 | Fastabend et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7975000 | Dixon et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7991559 | Dzekunov et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7991747 | Upadhyay et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
7996372 | Rubel, Jr. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8005891 | Knowles et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8010612 | Costea et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8010720 | Iwaoka et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8019881 | Sandhu et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8020206 | Hubbard et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8024384 | Prabhakar et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8032721 | Murai | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8036374 | Noble, Jr. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8037409 | Jacob et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8041749 | Beck | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8041913 | Wang | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8069161 | Bugir et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8069471 | Boren | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8082539 | Schelkogonov | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8090754 | Schmidt et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8095923 | Harvey et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8099709 | Baikov et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8103962 | Embley et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8117441 | Kurien et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8135815 | Mayer | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8146054 | Baker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8146074 | Ito et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8150717 | Whitmore | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8156105 | Altounian et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8156158 | Rolls et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8156159 | Ebrahimi et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8166406 | Goldfeder et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8176061 | Swanbeck et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8176177 | Sussman et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8176334 | Vainstein | May 2012 | B2 |
8176470 | Klumpp et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8180759 | Hamzy | May 2012 | B2 |
8181151 | Sedukhin et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8185409 | Putnam et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8196176 | Berteau et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8205093 | Argott | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8205140 | Hafeez et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8214362 | Djabarov | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8214803 | Horii et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8234377 | Cohn | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8239244 | Ginsberg et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8250051 | Bugir et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8255468 | Vitaldevara et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8260262 | Ben Ayed | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8261362 | Goodwin et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8266231 | Golovin et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8275632 | Awaraji et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8275793 | Ahmad et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8286239 | Sutton | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8312549 | Goldberg et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8316237 | Felsher et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8332908 | Hatakeyama et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8340999 | Kumaran et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8341405 | Meijer et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8346929 | Lai | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8364713 | Pollard | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8370224 | Grewal | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8370794 | Moosmann et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8380630 | Felsher | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8380743 | Convertino et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8381180 | Rostoker | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8381297 | Touboul | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8386314 | Kirkby et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8392982 | Harris et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8418226 | Gardner | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8423954 | Ronen et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8429179 | Mirhaji | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8429597 | Prigge | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8429630 | Nickolov et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8429758 | Chen et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8438644 | Watters et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8463247 | Misiag | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8464311 | Ashley et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8468244 | Redlich et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8473324 | Alvarez et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8474012 | Ahmed et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8494894 | Jaster et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8504481 | Motahari et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8510199 | Erlanger | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8515988 | Jones et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8516076 | Thomas | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8527337 | Lim et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8533746 | Nolan et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8533844 | Mahaffey et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8538817 | Wilson | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8539359 | Rapaport et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8539437 | Finlayson et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8560645 | Linden et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8560841 | Chin et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8560956 | Curtis et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561100 | Hu et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561153 | Grason et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565729 | Moseler et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8566726 | Dixon et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8566938 | Prakash et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8571909 | Miller et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572717 | Narayanaswamy | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8578036 | Holfelder et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8578166 | De Monseignat et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8578481 | Rowley | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8578501 | Ogilvie | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8583694 | Siegel et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8583766 | Dixon et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8589183 | Awaraji et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8601467 | Hofhansl et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8601591 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8606746 | Yeap et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8612420 | Sun et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8612993 | Grant et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8615549 | Knowles et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8615731 | Doshi | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8620952 | Bennett et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8621637 | Al-Harbi et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8626671 | Federgreen | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8627114 | Resch et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8630961 | Beilby et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8631048 | Davis et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8640110 | Kopp et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8646072 | Savant | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8650399 | Le Bihan et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8656265 | Paulin et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8656456 | Maxson et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8661036 | Turski et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8667074 | Farkas | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8667487 | Boodman et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8677472 | Dotan et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8681984 | Lee et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8682698 | Cashman et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8683502 | Shkedi et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8688601 | Jaiswal | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8689292 | Williams et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8693689 | Belenkiy et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8700524 | Williams et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8700699 | Shen et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8706742 | Ravid et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8707451 | Ture et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8712813 | King | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8713098 | Adya et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8713638 | Hu et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8719366 | Mathew et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8732839 | Hohl | May 2014 | B2 |
8744894 | Christiansen et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8751285 | Deb et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8762413 | Graham, Jr. et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8763071 | Sinha et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8763082 | Huber et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8763131 | Archer et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8767947 | Ristock et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8769242 | Tkac et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8769412 | Gill et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8769671 | Shraim et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8776241 | Zaitsev | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8788935 | Hirsch et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8793614 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8793650 | Hilerio et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8793781 | Grossi et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8793809 | Falkenburg et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8799984 | Ahn | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8805707 | Schumann, Jr. et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8805806 | Amarendran et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8805925 | Price et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8812342 | Barcelo et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8812752 | Shih et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8812766 | Kranendonk et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8813028 | Farooqi | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8819253 | Simeloff et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8819617 | Koenig et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8819800 | Gao et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8826446 | Liu et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8832649 | Bishop et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8832854 | Staddon et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8839232 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8843487 | McGraw et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8843745 | Roberts, Jr. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849757 | Kruglick | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8856534 | Khosravi et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8856936 | Datta Ray et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8862507 | Sandhu et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8863261 | Yang | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8875232 | Blom et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8893078 | Schaude et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8893286 | Oliver | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8893297 | Eversoll et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8904494 | Kindler et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8914263 | Shimada et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8914299 | Pesci-Anderson et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8914342 | Kalaboukis et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8914902 | Moritz et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8918306 | Cashman et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8918392 | Brooker et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8918632 | Sartor | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8930896 | Wiggins | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8930897 | Nassar | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8935198 | Phillips et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8935266 | Wu | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8935342 | Patel | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8935804 | Clark et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8938221 | Brazier et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8943076 | Stewart et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8943548 | Drokov et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8949137 | Crapo et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8955038 | Nicodemus et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8959568 | Hudis et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8959584 | Piliouras | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8966575 | McQuay et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8966597 | Saylor et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8973108 | Roth et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8977234 | Chava | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8977643 | Schindlauer et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8978158 | Rajkumar et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8983972 | Kriebel et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8984031 | Todd | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8990933 | Magdalin | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8996417 | Channakeshava | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8996480 | Agarwala et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8997213 | Papakipos et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9001673 | Birdsall et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9003295 | Baschy | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9003552 | Goodwin et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9009851 | Droste et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9014661 | Decharms | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9015796 | Fujioka | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9021469 | Hilerio et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9026526 | Bau et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9030987 | Bianchetti et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9032067 | Prasad et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9043217 | Cashman et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9043480 | Barton et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9047463 | Porras | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9047582 | Hutchinson et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9047583 | Patton et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9047639 | Quintiliani et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9049244 | Prince et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9049314 | Pugh et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9055071 | Gates et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9058590 | Criddle et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9064033 | Jin et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9069940 | Hars | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9076231 | Hill et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9077736 | Werth et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9081952 | Sagi et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9087090 | Cormier et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9092796 | Eversoll et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9094434 | Williams et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9098515 | Richter et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9100778 | Stogaitis et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9106691 | Burger et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9106710 | Feimster | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9110918 | Rajaa et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9111105 | Barton et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9111295 | Tietzen et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9123330 | Sharifi et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9123339 | Shaw et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9129311 | Schoen et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9135261 | Maunder et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9135444 | Carter et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9141823 | Dawson | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9141911 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9152818 | Hathaway et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9152820 | Pauley, Jr. et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9154514 | Prakash | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9154556 | Dotan et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9158655 | Wadhwani et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9165036 | Mehra | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9170996 | Lovric et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9172706 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9177293 | Gagnon et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9178901 | Xue et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9183100 | Gventer et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9189642 | Perlman | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9201572 | Lyon et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9201770 | Duerk | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9202026 | Reeves | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9202085 | Mawdsley et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9215076 | Roth et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9215252 | Smith et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9218596 | Ronca et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9224009 | Liu et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9230036 | Davis | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9231935 | Bridge et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9232040 | Barash et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9235476 | McHugh et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9240987 | Barrett-Bowen et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9241259 | Daniela et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9245126 | Christodorescu et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9245266 | Hardt | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9253609 | Hosier, Jr. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9264443 | Weisman | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9274858 | Milliron et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9280581 | Grimes et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9286149 | Sampson et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9286282 | Ling, III et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9288118 | Pattan | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9288556 | Kim et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9294498 | Yampolskiy et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9299050 | Stiffler et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9306939 | Chan et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9317697 | Maier et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9317715 | Schuette et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9325731 | McGeehan | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9336184 | Mital et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9336220 | Li et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9336324 | Lomme et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9336332 | Davis et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9336400 | Milman et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9338188 | Ahn | May 2016 | B1 |
9342706 | Chawla et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9344297 | Shah et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9344424 | Tenenboym et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9344484 | Ferris | May 2016 | B2 |
9348802 | Massand | May 2016 | B2 |
9348862 | Kawecki, III | May 2016 | B2 |
9348929 | Eberlein | May 2016 | B2 |
9349016 | Brisebois et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
9350718 | Sondhi et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9355157 | Mohammed et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9356961 | Todd et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
9361446 | Demirjian et al. | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9369488 | Woods et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9374693 | Olincy et al. | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9384199 | Thereska et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9384357 | Patil et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9386104 | Adams et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9395959 | Hatfield et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9396332 | Abrams et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9401900 | Levasseur et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9411967 | Parecki et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9411982 | Dippenaar et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9417859 | Gounares et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9424021 | Zamir | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9424414 | Demirjian et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9426177 | Wang et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9450940 | Belov et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9460136 | Todd et al. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9460171 | Marrelli et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9460307 | Breslau et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9461876 | Van Dusen et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9462009 | Kolman et al. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9465702 | Gventer et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9465800 | Lacey | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9473446 | Vijay et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9473505 | Asano et al. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9473535 | Sartor | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9477523 | Warman et al. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9477660 | Scott et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9477685 | Leung et al. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9477942 | Adachi et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9483659 | Bao et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9489366 | Scott et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9495547 | Schepis et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9501523 | Hyatt et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9507960 | Bell et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9509674 | Nasserbakht et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9509702 | Grigg et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9514231 | Eden | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9516012 | Chochois et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9521166 | Wilson | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9524500 | Dave et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9529989 | Kling et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9536108 | Powell et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9537546 | Cordeiro et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9542568 | Francis et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9549047 | Fredinburg et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9552395 | Bayer et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9552470 | Turgeman et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9553918 | Manion et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9558497 | Carvalho | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9569752 | Deering et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9571509 | Satish et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9571526 | Sartor | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9571559 | Raleigh et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9571991 | Brizendine et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9576289 | Henderson et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9578060 | Brisebois et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9578173 | Sanghavi et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9582681 | Mishra | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9584964 | Pelkey | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9589110 | Carey et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9600181 | Patel et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9602529 | Jones et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9606971 | Seolas et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9607041 | Himmelstein | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9619652 | Slater | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9619661 | Finkelstein | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9621357 | Williams et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9621566 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9626124 | Lipinski et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9626680 | Ryan et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9629064 | Graves et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9642008 | Wyatt et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9646095 | Gottlieb et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9647949 | Varki et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9648036 | Seiver et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9652314 | Mahiddini | May 2017 | B2 |
9654506 | Barrett | May 2017 | B2 |
9654541 | Kapczynski et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9665722 | Nagasundaram et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9665733 | Sills et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9665883 | Roullier et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9672053 | Tang et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9672355 | Titonis et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9678794 | Barrett et al. | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9691090 | Barday | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9699209 | Ng et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9703549 | Dufresne | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9704103 | Suskind et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9705840 | Pujare et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9705880 | Siris | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9721078 | Cornick et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9721108 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9727751 | Oliver et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9729583 | Barday | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9734255 | Jiang | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9736004 | Jung et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9740985 | Byron et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9740987 | Dolan | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9749408 | Subramani et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9754091 | Kode et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9756059 | Demirjian et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9760620 | Nachnani et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9760635 | Bliss et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9760697 | Walker | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9760849 | Vinnakota et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9762553 | Ford et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9767202 | Darby et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9767309 | Patel et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9769124 | Yan | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9773269 | Lazarus | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9785795 | Grondin et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9787671 | Bogrett | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9798749 | Saner | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9798826 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9798896 | Jakobsson | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9800605 | Baikalov et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9800606 | Yumer | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9804649 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9804928 | Davis et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9805381 | Frank et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9811532 | Parkison et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9817850 | Dubbels et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9817978 | Marsh et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9819684 | Cernoch et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9825928 | Lelcuk et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9830563 | Paknad | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9832633 | Gerber, Jr. et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9836598 | Iyer et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9838407 | Oprea et al. | Dec 2017 | B1 |
9838839 | Vudali et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9841969 | Seibert, Jr. et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9842042 | Chhatwal et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9842349 | Sawczuk et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9848005 | Ardeli et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9848061 | Jain et al. | Dec 2017 | B1 |
9852150 | Sharpe et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9853959 | Kapczynski et al. | Dec 2017 | B1 |
9860226 | Thormaehlen | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9864735 | Lamprecht | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9876825 | Amar et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9877138 | Franklin | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9880157 | Levak et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9882935 | Barday | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9887965 | Kay et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9888377 | McCorkendale et al. | Feb 2018 | B1 |
9892441 | Barday | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9892442 | Barday | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9892443 | Barday | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9892444 | Barday | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9894076 | Li et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9898613 | Swerdlow et al. | Feb 2018 | B1 |
9898739 | Monastyrsky et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9898769 | Barday | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9912625 | Mutha et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9912677 | Chien | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9912810 | Segre et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9916703 | Levinson et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9922124 | Rathod | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9923927 | McClintock et al. | Mar 2018 | B1 |
9928379 | Hoffer | Mar 2018 | B1 |
9934493 | Castinado et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9934544 | Whitfield et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9936127 | Todasco | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9942214 | Burciu et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9942244 | Lahoz et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9942276 | Sartor | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9946897 | Lovin | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9948652 | Yu et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9948663 | Wang et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9953189 | Cook et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9954879 | Sadaghiani et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9954883 | Ahuja et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9959551 | Schermerhorn et al. | May 2018 | B1 |
9959582 | Sukman et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9961070 | Tang | May 2018 | B2 |
9973518 | Lee et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9973585 | Ruback et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9977904 | Khan et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9977920 | Danielson et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9983936 | Dornemann et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9984252 | Pollard | May 2018 | B2 |
9990499 | Chan et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
9992213 | Sinnema | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10001975 | Bharthulwar | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10002064 | Muske | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10007895 | Vanasco | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10013577 | Beaumont et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10015164 | Hamburg et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10019339 | Von Hanxleden et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10019588 | Garcia et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10019591 | Beguin | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10019741 | Hesselink | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10021143 | Cabrera et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10025804 | Vranyes et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10028226 | Ayyagari et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10032172 | Barday | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10044761 | Ducatel et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10055426 | Arasan et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10055869 | Borrelli et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10061847 | Mohammed et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10069858 | Robinson et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10069914 | Smith | Sep 2018 | B1 |
10073924 | Karp et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10075437 | Costigan et al. | Sep 2018 | B1 |
10075451 | Hall et al. | Sep 2018 | B1 |
10084817 | Saher et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10091214 | Godlewski et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10091312 | Khanwalkar et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10102533 | Barday | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10108409 | Pirzadeh et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10122663 | Hu et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10122760 | Terrill et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10127403 | Kong et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10129211 | Heath | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10140666 | Wang et al. | Nov 2018 | B1 |
10142113 | Zaidi et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10152560 | Potiagalov et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10158676 | Barday | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10165011 | Barday | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10169762 | Ogawa | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10176503 | Barday et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10181043 | Pauley, Jr. et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10181051 | Barday et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10187363 | Smirnoff et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10187394 | Bar et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10204154 | Barday et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10205994 | Splaine et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10212134 | Rai | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10212175 | Seul et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10223533 | Dawson | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10230571 | Rangasamy et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10250594 | Chathoth et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10255602 | Wang | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10257127 | Dotan-Cohen et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10257181 | Sherif et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10268838 | Yadgiri et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10275221 | Thattai et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10275614 | Barday et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10282370 | Barday et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
10282559 | Barday et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10284604 | Barday et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10289584 | Chiba | May 2019 | B2 |
10289857 | Brinskelle | May 2019 | B1 |
10289866 | Barday et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10289867 | Barday et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10289870 | Barday et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10296504 | Hock et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10304442 | Rudden et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
10310723 | Rathod | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10311042 | Kumar | Jun 2019 | B1 |
10311475 | Yuasa | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10311492 | Gelfenbeyn et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10318761 | Barday et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10320940 | Brennan et al. | Jun 2019 | B1 |
10324960 | Skvortsov et al. | Jun 2019 | B1 |
10326768 | Verweyst et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10326798 | Lambert | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10326841 | Bradley et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10331689 | Sorrentino et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10331904 | Sher-Jan et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10333975 | Soman et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10346186 | Kalyanpur | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10346635 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10346637 | Barday et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10346638 | Barday et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10346849 | Ionescu et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10348726 | Caluwaert | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10348775 | Barday | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10353673 | Barday et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10361857 | Woo | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10366241 | Sartor | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10373119 | Driscoll et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10373409 | White et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10375115 | Mallya | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10387559 | Wendt et al. | Aug 2019 | B1 |
10387657 | Belfiore, Jr. et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10387952 | Sandhu et al. | Aug 2019 | B1 |
10395201 | Vescio | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10402545 | Gorfein et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10404729 | Turgeman | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10417401 | Votaw et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10417621 | Cassel et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10419476 | Parekh | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10423985 | Dutta et al. | Sep 2019 | B1 |
10425492 | Comstock et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10430608 | Peri et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10435350 | Ito et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10437412 | Barday et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10437860 | Barday et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10438016 | Barday et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10438273 | Burns et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10440062 | Barday et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10445508 | Sher-Jan et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10445526 | Barday et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10452864 | Barday et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10452866 | Barday et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10453076 | Parekh et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10453092 | Wang et al. | Oct 2019 | B1 |
10454934 | Parimi et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10481763 | Bartkiewicz et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10489454 | Chen | Nov 2019 | B1 |
10503926 | Barday et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10510031 | Barday et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10521623 | Rodriguez et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10534851 | Chan et al. | Jan 2020 | B1 |
10535081 | Ferreira et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10536475 | McCorkle, Jr. et al. | Jan 2020 | B1 |
10536478 | Kirti et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10541938 | Timmerman et al. | Jan 2020 | B1 |
10546135 | Kassoumeh et al. | Jan 2020 | B1 |
10552462 | Hart | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10558809 | Joyce et al. | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10558821 | Barday et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10564815 | Soon-Shiong | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10564935 | Barday et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10564936 | Barday et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10565161 | Barday et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10565236 | Barday et al. | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10567439 | Barday | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10567517 | Weinig et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10572684 | Lafever et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10572686 | Barday et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10574705 | Barday et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10581825 | Poschel et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10592648 | Barday et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10592692 | Brannon et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10606916 | Brannon et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10613971 | Vasikarla | Apr 2020 | B1 |
10628553 | Murrish et al. | Apr 2020 | B1 |
10645102 | Hamdi | May 2020 | B2 |
10645548 | Reynolds et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10649630 | Vora et al. | May 2020 | B1 |
10650408 | Andersen et al. | May 2020 | B1 |
10657469 | Bade et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10657504 | Zimmerman et al. | May 2020 | B1 |
10659566 | Luah et al. | May 2020 | B1 |
10671749 | Felice-Steele et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10671760 | Esmailzadeh et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10678945 | Barday et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10685140 | Barday et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10706176 | Brannon et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10706226 | Byun et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10708305 | Barday et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10713387 | Brannon et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10726145 | Duminy et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10726153 | Nerurkar et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10726158 | Brannon et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10732865 | Jain et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10735388 | Rose et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10740487 | Barday et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10747893 | Kiriyama et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10747897 | Cook | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10749870 | Brouillette et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10762213 | Rudek et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10762236 | Brannon et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10769302 | Barday et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10769303 | Brannon et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10776510 | Antonelli et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10776518 | Barday et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10778792 | Handy Bosma et al. | Sep 2020 | B1 |
10783256 | Brannon et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10785173 | Willett et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10785299 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10791150 | Barday et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10795527 | Legge et al. | Oct 2020 | B1 |
10796020 | Barday et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10796260 | Brannon et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10798133 | Barday et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10803196 | Bodegas Martinez et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10805331 | Boyer et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10831831 | Greene | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10834590 | Turgeman et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10846433 | Brannon et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10853501 | Brannon | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10860721 | Gentile | Dec 2020 | B1 |
10860742 | Joseph et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10860979 | Geffen et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10878127 | Brannon et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10885485 | Brannon et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10891393 | Currier et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10893074 | Sartor | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10896394 | Brannon et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10902490 | He et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10909488 | Hecht et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10924514 | Altman et al. | Feb 2021 | B1 |
10949555 | Rattan et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10949565 | Barday et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10957326 | Bhaya et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10963571 | Bar Joseph et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10963572 | Belfiore, Jr. et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10965547 | Esposito et al. | Mar 2021 | B1 |
10970418 | Durvasula et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10972509 | Barday et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10976950 | Trezzo et al. | Apr 2021 | B1 |
10983963 | Venkatasubramanian et al. | Apr 2021 | B1 |
10984458 | Gutierrez | Apr 2021 | B1 |
10997318 | Barday et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11003748 | Oliker et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11012475 | Patnala et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11023528 | Lee et al. | Jun 2021 | B1 |
11037168 | Lee et al. | Jun 2021 | B1 |
11057356 | Malhotra et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11057427 | Wright et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11062051 | Barday et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11068318 | Kuesel et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11068584 | Burriesci et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11068618 | Brannon et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11068797 | Bhide et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11068847 | Boutros et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11093950 | Hersh et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11138299 | Brannon et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11144622 | Brannon et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11144678 | Dondini et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11144862 | Jackson et al. | Oct 2021 | B1 |
11195134 | Brannon et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11201929 | Dudmesh et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11210420 | Brannon et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11238390 | Brannon et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11240273 | Barday et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11252159 | Kannan et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11256777 | Brannon et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11263262 | Chen | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11327996 | Reynolds et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
20020004736 | Roundtree et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020049907 | Woods et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020055932 | Wheeler et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077941 | Halligan et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020103854 | Okita | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020129216 | Collins | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161594 | Bryan et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161733 | Grainger | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030041250 | Proudler | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065641 | Chaloux | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093680 | Astley et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097451 | Bjorksten et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097661 | Li et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030115142 | Brickell et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130893 | Farmer | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131001 | Matsuo | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131093 | Aschen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140150 | Kemp et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030167216 | Brown et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030212604 | Cullen | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040002818 | Kulp et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040025053 | Hayward | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040088235 | Ziekle et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098366 | Sinclair et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098493 | Rees | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111359 | Hudock | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040186912 | Harlow et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193907 | Patanella | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050022198 | Olapurath et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033616 | Vavul et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050076294 | Dehamer et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050114343 | Wesinger, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050144066 | Cope et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050197884 | Mullen, Jr. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198177 | Black | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198646 | Kortela | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050246292 | Sarcanin | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278538 | Fowler | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060031078 | Pizzinger et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060035204 | Lamarche et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060075122 | Lindskog et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060149730 | Curtis | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060156052 | Bodnar et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060190280 | Hoebel et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206375 | Scott et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224422 | Cohen | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253597 | Mujica | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259416 | Johnson | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070011058 | Dev | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027715 | Gropper et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070061125 | Bhatt et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061393 | Moore | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070130101 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070130323 | Landsman et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070157311 | Meier et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173355 | Klein | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179793 | Bagchi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070180490 | Renzi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192438 | Goei | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070266420 | Hawkins et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070283171 | Breslin et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015927 | Ramirez | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028065 | Caso et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028435 | Strickland et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080047016 | Spoonamore | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080120699 | Spear | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140696 | Mathuria | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080189306 | Hewett et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195436 | Whyte | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080222271 | Spires | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235177 | Kim et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080270203 | Holmes et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270351 | Thomsen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270381 | Thomsen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270382 | Thomsen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270451 | Thomsen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270462 | Thomsen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281649 | Morris | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282320 | Denovo et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288271 | Faust | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288299 | Schultz | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090012896 | Arnold | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090022301 | Mudaliar | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037975 | Ishikawa et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090119500 | Roth et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132419 | Grammer et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138276 | Hayashida et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090140035 | Miller | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090144702 | Atkin et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090158249 | Tomkins et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090172705 | Cheong | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182818 | Krywaniuk | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187764 | Astakhov et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204452 | Iskandar et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204820 | Brandenburg et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090210347 | Sarcanin | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216610 | Chorny | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090249076 | Reed et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090303237 | Liu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010912 | Jones | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100010968 | Redlich | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100077484 | Paretti et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082533 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094650 | Tran et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100398 | Auker et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100121773 | Currier et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100192201 | Shimoni et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100205057 | Hook et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223349 | Thorson | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228786 | Török | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234987 | Benschop et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235297 | Mamorsky | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235915 | Memon et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250497 | Redlich | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100262624 | Pullikottil | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268628 | Pitkow et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268932 | Bhattacharjee | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281313 | White et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100287114 | Bartko et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100333012 | Adachi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110006996 | Smith et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110010202 | Neale | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110082794 | Blechman | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110137696 | Meyer et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145154 | Rivers et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153396 | Marcuvitz et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110191664 | Sheleheda et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110208850 | Sheleheda et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110209067 | Bogess et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110231896 | Tovar | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238573 | Varadarajan | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110252456 | Hatakeyama | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110302643 | Pichna et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120041939 | Amsterdamski | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120084151 | Kozak et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120084349 | Lee et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102411 | Sathish | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102543 | Kohli et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110674 | Belani et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120116923 | Irving et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131438 | Li et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143650 | Crowley et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120144499 | Tan et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120191596 | Kremen et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120226621 | Petran et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120239557 | Weinflash et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120254320 | Dove et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120259752 | Agee | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120323700 | Aleksandrovich et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330769 | Arceo | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330869 | Durham | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130004933 | Bhaskaran | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130018954 | Cheng | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130085801 | Sharpe et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130091156 | Raiche et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130103485 | Postrel | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130111323 | Taghaddos et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124257 | Schubert | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144901 | Ho | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159351 | Hamann et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130171968 | Wang | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130179982 | Bridges et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130179988 | Bekker et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130185806 | Hatakeyama | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130218829 | Martinez | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130219459 | Bradley | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130254649 | Oneill | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130254699 | Bashir et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130262328 | Federgreen | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130282466 | Hampton | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290169 | Bathula et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130298071 | Wine | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130311224 | Heroux et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318207 | Dotter | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130326112 | Park et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130332362 | Ciurea | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130340086 | Blom | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140006355 | Kirihata | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006616 | Aad et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140012833 | Humprecht | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019561 | Belity et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140032259 | Lafever et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140032265 | Paprocki | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140040134 | Ciurea | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140040161 | Berlin | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140040979 | Barton et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140041048 | Goodwin et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140047551 | Nagasundaram et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140052463 | Cashman et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140067973 | Eden | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074645 | Ingram | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140089027 | Brown | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140089039 | McClellan | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140108173 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108968 | Vishria | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140137257 | Martinez et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140142988 | Grosso et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140143011 | Mudugu et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140164476 | Thomson | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188956 | Subba et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140196143 | Fliderman et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140208418 | Libin | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140222468 | Araya et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140244309 | Francois | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140244325 | Cartwright | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140244375 | Kim | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140244399 | Orduna et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140257917 | Spencer et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140258093 | Gardiner et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140278539 | Edwards | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140278663 | Samuel et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140278730 | Muhart et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140283027 | Orona et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140283106 | Stahura et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140288971 | Whibbs, III | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289681 | Wielgosz | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289862 | Gorfein et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140317171 | Fox et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140324480 | Dufel et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140337041 | Madden et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140337466 | Li et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140344015 | Puértolas-Montañés et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150006514 | Hung | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150012363 | Grant et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150019530 | Felch | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150026056 | Calman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150026260 | Worthley | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150033112 | Norwood et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150066577 | Christiansen et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150066865 | Yara et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088598 | Acharyya et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150106264 | Johnson | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150106867 | Liang | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150106948 | Holman et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150106949 | Holman et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150121462 | Courage et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150143258 | Carolan et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150149362 | Baum et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150154520 | Federgreen et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150169318 | Nash | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150172296 | Fujioka | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150178740 | Borawski et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150199534 | Francis et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150199541 | Koch et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150199702 | Singh | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150229664 | Hawthorn et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150235049 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150235050 | Wouhaybi et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150235283 | Nishikawa | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150242778 | Wilcox et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150242858 | Smith et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150248391 | Watanabe | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150254597 | Jahagirdar | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150261887 | Joukov | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150262189 | Vergeer | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150264417 | Spitz et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150269384 | Holman et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150271167 | Kalai | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150309813 | Patel | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150310227 | Ishida et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150310575 | Shelton | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150348200 | Fair et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150356362 | Demos | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150379430 | Dirac et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160006760 | Lala et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160012465 | Sharp | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160026394 | Goto | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160034918 | Bjelajac et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160048700 | Stransky-Heilkron | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160050213 | Storr | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160063523 | Nistor et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160063567 | Srivastava | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160071112 | Unser | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160080405 | Schler et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160099963 | Mahaffey et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160103963 | Mishra | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160110352 | Bendersky | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160125550 | Joao et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160125749 | Delacroix et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160125751 | Barker et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160140466 | Sidebottom et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160143570 | Valacich et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160148143 | Anderson et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160162269 | Pogorelik et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160164915 | Cook | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160180386 | Konig | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160188450 | Appusamy et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160189156 | Kim et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160196189 | Miyagi et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160225000 | Glasgow | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160232465 | Kurtz et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160232534 | Lacey et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160234319 | Griffin | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160253497 | Christodorescu et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160255139 | Rathod | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160261631 | Vissamsetty et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160262163 | Gonzalez Garrido et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160292453 | Patterson et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160292621 | Ciccone et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160321582 | Broudou et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160321748 | Mahatma et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160330237 | Edlabadkar | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160335531 | Mullen et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160342811 | Whitcomb et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160364736 | Maugans, III | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160370954 | Burningham et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160378762 | Rohter | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160381064 | Chan et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160381560 | Margaliot | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170004055 | Horan et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170032395 | Kaufman et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170032408 | Kumar et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170034101 | Kumar et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170041324 | Ionutescu et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170046399 | Sankaranarasimhan et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170046753 | Deupree, IV | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170061501 | Horwich | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170068785 | Experton et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170070495 | Cherry et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170093917 | Chandra et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170115864 | Thomas et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170124570 | Nidamanuri et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170140174 | Lacey et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170140467 | Neag et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170142158 | Laoutaris et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170142177 | Hu | May 2017 | A1 |
20170154188 | Meier et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170161520 | Lockhart, III et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170171235 | Mulchandani et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170171325 | Perez | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170177324 | Frank et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170180378 | Tyler et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170180505 | Shaw et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170193017 | Migliori | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170193624 | Tsai | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170201518 | Holmqvist et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170206707 | Guay et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170208084 | Steelman et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170220685 | Yan et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170220964 | Datta Ray | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170249710 | Guillama et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170269791 | Meyerzon et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170270318 | Ritchie | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170278004 | McElhinney et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170278117 | Wallace et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170286719 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170287031 | Barday | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170289199 | Barday | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170308875 | O'Regan et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170316400 | Venkatakrishnan et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170330197 | DiMaggio et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170353404 | Hodge | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180032757 | Michael | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180039975 | Hefetz | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180041498 | Kikuchi | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180046753 | Shelton | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180046939 | Meron et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180063174 | Grill et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180063190 | Wright et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180082368 | Weinflash et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180083843 | Sambandam | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180091476 | Jakobsson et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180131574 | Jacobs et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180131658 | Bhagwan et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180165637 | Romero et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180198614 | Neumann | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180204281 | Painter et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180219917 | Chiang | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180239500 | Allen et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180248914 | Sartor | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180285887 | Maung | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180301222 | Dew, Sr. et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180307859 | Lafever et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180336509 | Guttmann | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180349583 | Turgeman et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180351888 | Howard | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180352003 | Winn et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180357243 | Yoon | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180365720 | Goldman et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180374030 | Barday et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180375814 | Hart | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190005210 | Wiederspohn et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190012211 | Selvaraj | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190012672 | Francesco | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190019184 | Lacey et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190050547 | Welsh et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190087570 | Sloane | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190096020 | Barday et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190108353 | Sadeh et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190130132 | Barbas et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190138496 | Yamaguchi | May 2019 | A1 |
20190139087 | Dabbs et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190148003 | Van Hoe | May 2019 | A1 |
20190156053 | Vogel et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190156058 | Van Dyne et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190171801 | Barday et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190179652 | Hesener et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190180051 | Barday et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190182294 | Rieke et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190188402 | Wang et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190266200 | Francolla | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190266201 | Barday et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190266350 | Barday et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190268343 | Barday et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190268344 | Barday et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190272492 | Elledge et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190294818 | Barday et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190332802 | Barday et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190332807 | Lafever et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190333118 | Crimmins et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190354709 | Brinskelle | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190356684 | Sinha et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190362169 | Lin et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190362268 | Fogarty et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190377901 | Balzer et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190378073 | Lopez et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190384934 | Kim | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190392162 | Stern et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190392170 | Barday et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190392171 | Barday et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200020454 | McGarvey et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200050966 | Enuka et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200051117 | Mitchell | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200057781 | McCormick | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200074471 | Adjaoute | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200081865 | Farrar et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200082270 | Gu et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200090197 | Rodriguez et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200092179 | Chieu et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200110589 | Bequet et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200110904 | Shinde et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200117737 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200137097 | Zimmermann et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200143301 | Bowers | May 2020 | A1 |
20200143797 | Manoharan et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200159952 | Dain | May 2020 | A1 |
20200159955 | Barlik et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200167653 | Manjunath et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200175424 | Kursun | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200183655 | Barday et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200186355 | Davies | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200193018 | Van Dyke | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200193022 | Lunsford et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200210558 | Barday et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200210620 | Haletky | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200211002 | Steinberg | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200220901 | Barday et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200226156 | Borra et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200226196 | Brannon et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200242259 | Chirravuri et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200242719 | Lee | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200250342 | Miller et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200252413 | Buzbee et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200252817 | Brouillette et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200272764 | Brannon et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200293679 | Handy Bosma et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200296171 | Mocanu et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200302089 | Barday et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200310917 | Tkachev et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200311310 | Barday et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200344243 | Brannon et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200356695 | Brannon et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200364369 | Brannon et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200372178 | Barday et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200394327 | Childress et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200401380 | Jacobs et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200401962 | Gottemukkala et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200410117 | Barday et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200410131 | Barday et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200410132 | Brannon et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210012341 | Garg et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210056569 | Silberman et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210075775 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210081567 | Park et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210099449 | Frederick et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210110047 | Fang | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210125089 | Nickl et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210152496 | Kim et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210233157 | Crutchfield, Jr. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210243595 | Buck et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210248247 | Poothokaran et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210256163 | Fleming et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210279360 | Gimenez Palop et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210297441 | Olalere | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210303828 | Lafreniere et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210312061 | Schroeder et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210326786 | Sun et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210328969 | Gaddam et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210382949 | Yastrebenetsky et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20210397735 | Samatov et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20210400018 | Vettaikaran et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20210406712 | Bhide et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220137850 | Boddu et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
111496802 | Aug 2020 | CN |
112115859 | Dec 2020 | CN |
1394698 | Mar 2004 | EP |
2031540 | Mar 2009 | EP |
20130062500 | Jun 2013 | KR |
2001033430 | May 2001 | WO |
20020067158 | Aug 2002 | WO |
20030050773 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2005008411 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2007002412 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2008134203 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2012174659 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2015116905 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2020146028 | Jul 2020 | WO |
2022006421 | Jan 2022 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Amar et al, “Privacy-Aware Infrastructure for Managing Personal Data,” ACM, pp. 571-572, Aug. 22-26, 2016 (Year: 2016). |
Banerjee et al, “Link Before You Share: Managing Privacy Policies through Blockchain,” IEEE, pp. 4438-4447 (Year: 2017). |
Civili et al, “Mastro Studio: Managing Ontology-Based Data Access Applications,” ACM, pp. 1314-1317, Aug. 26-30, 2013 (Year: 2013). |
Degeling et al, “We Value Your Privacy . . . Now Take Some Cookies: Measuring the GDPRs Impact on Web Privacy,” arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, Aug. 15, 2018, pp. 1-15 (Year: 2019). |
Geko et al, “An Ontology Capturing the Interdependence of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Information Security,” ACM, pp. 1-6, Nov. 15-16, 2018 (Year: 2018). |
International Search Report, dated Jan. 5, 2022, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2021/050497. |
Lu, “How Machine Learning Mitigates Racial Bias in the US Housing Market,” Available as SSRN 3489519, pp. 1-73, Nov. 2019 (Year: 2019). |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 30, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,520. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 11, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/371,350. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 12, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/334,948. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 12, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/463,775. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 24, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/340,699. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 26, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/491,906. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 5, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/475,241. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 6, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/407,765. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 7, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/222,725. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 30, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/149,421. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 14, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/499,595. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 21, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/499,624. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 25, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/494,220. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 4, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/480,377. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 7, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/387,421. |
Rakers, “Managing Professional and Personal Sensitive Information,” ACM, pp. 9-13, Oct. 24-27, 2010 (Year: 2010). |
Sachinopoulou et al, “Ontology-Based Approach for Managing Personal Health and Wellness Information,” IEEE, pp. 1802-1805 (Year: 2007). |
Shankar et al, “Doppleganger: Better Browser Privacy Without the Bother,” Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security; [ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security], New York, NY : ACM, US, Oct. 30, 2006, pp. 154-167 (Year: 2006). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jan. 5, 2022, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2021/050497. |
Yue et al, “An Automatic HTTP Cookie Management System,” Computer Networks, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 54, No. 13, Sep. 15, 2010, pp. 2182-2198 (Year: 2010). |
International Search Report, dated Aug. 8, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036893. |
International Search Report, dated Aug. 8, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036901. |
International Search Report, dated Aug. 8, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036913. |
International Search Report, dated Aug. 8, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036920. |
International Search Report, dated Dec. 14, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/045296. |
International Search Report, dated Jan. 14, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/046949. |
International Search Report, dated Jan. 7, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/055772. |
International Search Report, dated Jun. 21, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/025600. |
International Search Report, dated Jun. 6, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/025605. |
International Search Report, dated Jun. 6, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/025611. |
International Search Report, dated Mar. 14, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/055736. |
International Search Report, dated Mar. 4, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/055773. |
International Search Report, dated Mar. 4, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/055774. |
International Search Report, dated Nov. 19, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/046939. |
International Search Report, dated Oct. 11, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/043975. |
International Search Report, dated Oct. 11, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/043976. |
International Search Report, dated Oct. 11, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/043977. |
International Search Report, dated Oct. 11, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/044026. |
International Search Report, dated Oct. 11, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/045240. |
International Search Report, dated Oct. 12, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036888. |
International Search Report, dated Oct. 12, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/044046. |
International Search Report, dated Oct. 16, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/045243. |
International Search Report, dated Oct. 18, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/045249. |
International Search Report, dated Oct. 20, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036917. |
International Search Report, dated Oct. 3, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036912. |
International Search Report, dated Sep. 1, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036896. |
International Search Report, dated Sep. 12, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/037504. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Search Fees, dated Aug. 10, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036912. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Search Fees, dated Aug. 10, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036917. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Search Fees, dated Aug. 24, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036888. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Search Fees, dated Jan. 18, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/055736. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Search Fees, dated Jan. 7, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/055773. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Search Fees, dated Jan. 8, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/055774. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Search Fees, dated Oct. 23, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/045296. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jun. 6, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/025611. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Aug. 15, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036919. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Aug. 21, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036914. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Aug. 29, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036898. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Aug. 8, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036889. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Aug. 8, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036890. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Aug. 8, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036893. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Aug. 8, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036901. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Aug. 8, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036913. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Aug. 8, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036920. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Dec. 14, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/045296. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jan. 14, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/046949. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jan. 7, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/055772. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jun. 21, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/025600. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jun. 6, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/025605. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Mar. 14, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/055736. |
Tsai et al, “Determinants of Intangible Assets Value: The Data Mining Approach,” Knowledge Based System, pp. 67-77 http://www.elsevier.com/locate/knosys (Year: 2012). |
Tuomas Aura et al., Scanning Electronic Documents for Personally Identifiable Information, ACM, Oct. 30, 2006, retrieved online on Jun. 13, 2019, pp. 41-49. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1180000/1179608/p41-aura.pdf? (Year: 2006). |
Wang et al, “Revealing Key Non-Financial Factors for Online Credit-Scoring in E-Financing,” 2013, IEEE, pp. 1-6 (Year: 2013). |
Wang et al, “Secure and Efficient Access to Outsourced Data,” ACM, pp. 55-65 (Year: 2009). |
Weaver et al, “Understanding Information Preview in Mobile Email Processing”, ACM, pp. 303-312, 2011 (Year: 2011). |
Wu et al, “Data Mining with Big Data,” IEEE, Jan. 2014, pp. 97-107, vol. 26, No. 1, (Year: 2014). |
www.truste.com (1), 200150207, Internet Archive Wayback Machine, www.archive.org,2_7_2015. |
Xu, et al, “GatorShare: A File System Framework for High-Throughput Data Management,” ACM, pp. 776-786 (Year: 2010). |
Yang et al, “DAC-MACS: Effective Data Access Control for Multiauthority Cloud Storage Systems,” IEEE, pp. 1790-1801 (Year: 2013). |
Yang et al, “Mining Web Access Sequence with Improved Apriori Algorithm,” IEEE, 2017, pp. 780-784 (Year: 2017). |
Ye et al, “An Evolution-Based Cache Scheme for Scalable Mobile Data Access,” ACM, pp. 1-7 (Year: 2007). |
Yin et al, “Multibank Memory Optimization for Parallel Data Access in Multiple Data Arrays”, ACM, pp. 1-8 (Year: 2016). |
Yiu et al, “Outsourced Similarity Search on Metric Data Assets”, IEEE, pp. 338-352 (Year: 2012). |
Yu, “Using Data from Social Media Websites to Inspire the Design of Assistive Technology”, ACM, pp. 1-2 (Year: 2016). |
Yu, et al, “Performance and Fairness Issues in Big Data Transfers,” ACM, pp. 9-11 (Year: 2014). |
Zannone, et al, “Maintaining Privacy on Derived Objects,” ACM, pp. 10-19 (Year: 2005). |
Zeldovich, Nickolai, et al, Making Information Flow Explicit in HiStar, OSDI '06: 7th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, USENIX Association, p. 263-278. |
Zhang et al, “Data Transfer Performance Issues for a Web Services Interface to Synchrotron Experiments”, ACM, pp. 59-65 (Year: 2007). |
Zhang et al, “Dynamic Topic Modeling for Monitoring Market Competition from Online Text and Image Data”, ACM, pp. 1425-1434 (Year: 2015). |
Zheng, et al, “Methodologies for Cross-Domain Data Fusion: An Overview,” IEEE, pp. 16-34 (Year: 2015). |
Zheng, et al, “Toward Assured Data Deletion in Cloud Storage,” IEEE, vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 101-107 May/Jun. 2020 (Year: 2020). |
Zhu, et al, “Dynamic Data Integration Using Web Services,” IEEE, pp. 1-8 (Year: 2004). |
Bin, et al, “Research on Data Mining Models for the Internet of Things,” IEEE, pp. 1-6 (Year: 2010). |
Borgida, “Description Logics in Data Management,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 7, No. 5, Oct. 1995, pp. 671-682 (Year: 1995). |
Final Office Action, dated Aug. 9, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/119,080. |
Golab, et al, “Issues in Data Stream Management,” ACM, SIGMOD Record, vol. 32, No. 2, Jun. 2003, pp. 5-14 (Year: 2003). |
Halevy, et al, “Schema Mediation in Peer Data Management Systems,” IEEE, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Data Engineering, 2003, pp. 505-516 (Year: 2003). |
Jensen, et al, “Temporal Data Management,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 11, No. 1, Jan./Feb. 1999, pp. 36-44 (Year: 1999). |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 4, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/895,278. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 9, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/881,699. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 26, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/151,399. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 26, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/207,316. |
Pearson, et al, “A Model-Based Privacy Compliance Checker,” IJEBR, vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 63-83, 2009, Nov. 21, 2008. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jebr.2009040104 (Year: 2008). |
Czeskis et al, “Lightweight Server Support for Browser-based CSRF Protection,” Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, 2013, pp. 273-284 (Year: 2013). |
Final Office Action, dated Feb. 25, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/346,586. |
Final Office Action, dated Mar. 21, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/373,444. |
Final Office Action, dated Mar. 22, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/380,485. |
Matte et al, “Do Cookie Banners Respect my Choice?: Measuring Legal Compliance of Banners from IAB Europe's Transparency and Consent Framework,” 2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), 2020, pp. 791-809 (Year: 2020). |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 24, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/234,205. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 24, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/549,170. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 16, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/486,350. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 2, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/872,130. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 2, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/535,098. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 21, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/366,754. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 22, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/475,244. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 22, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/504,102. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 28, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/499,609. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 4, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/409,999. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 1, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/119,080. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 2, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/020,275. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 2, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/161,159. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 2, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/200,698. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 21, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/571,871. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 22, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/187,329. |
Sanchez-Rola et al, “Can I Opt Out Yet?: GDPR and the Global Illusion of Cookie Control,” Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2019, pp. 340-351 (Year: 2019). |
Chowdhury et al, “Managing Data Transfers in Computer Clusters with Orchestra,” ACM, pp. 98-109 (Year: 2011). |
Decision Regarding Institution of Post-Grant Review in Case PGR2018-00056 for U.S. Pat. No. 9,691,090 B1, Oct. 11, 2018. |
Dimou et al, “Machine-Interpretable Dataset and Service Descriptions for Heterogeneous Data Access and Retrieval”, ACM, pp. 145-152 (Year: 2015). |
Dokholyan et al, “Regulatory and Ethical Considerations for Linking Clinical and Administrative Databases,” American Heart Journal 157.6 (2009), pp. 971-982 (Year: 2009). |
Dunkel et al, “Data Organization and Access for Efficient Data Mining”, IEEE, pp. 522-529 (Year: 1999). |
Dwork, Cynthia, Differential Privacy, Microsoft Research, p. 1-12. |
Emerson, et al, “A Data Mining Driven Risk Profiling Method for Road Asset Management,” ACM, pp. 1267-1275 (Year: 2013). |
Enck, William, et al, TaintDroid: An Information-Flow Tracking System for Realtime Privacy Monitoring on Smartphones, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, vol. 32, No. 2, Article 5, Jun. 2014, p. 5:1-5:29. |
Falahrastegar, Marjan, et al, Tracking Personal Identifiers Across the Web, Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—Miccai 2015, 18th International Conference, Oct. 5, 2015, Munich, Germany. |
Final Written Decision Regarding Post-Grant Review in Case PGR2018-00056 for U.S. Pat. No. 9,691,090 B1, Oct. 10, 2019. |
Francis, Andre, Business Mathematics and Statistics, South-Western Cengage Learning, 2008, Sixth Edition. |
Friedman et al, “Data Mining with Differential Privacy,” ACM, Jul. 2010, pp. 493-502 (Year: 2010). |
Friedman et al, “Informed Consent in the Mozilla Browser: Implementing Value-Sensitive Design,” Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002, IEEE, pp. 1-10 (Year: 2002). |
Frikken, Keith B., et al, Yet Another Privacy Metric for Publishing Micro-data, Miami University, Oct. 27, 2008, p. 117-121. |
Fung et al, “Discover Information and Knowledge from Websites using an Integrated Summarization and Visualization Framework”, IEEE, pp. 232-235 (Year: 2010). |
Gajare et al, “Improved Automatic Feature Selection Approach for Health Risk Prediction,” Feb. 16, 2018, IEEE, pp. 816-819 (Year: 2018). |
Ghiglieri, Marco et al.; Personal DLP for Facebook, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (Percom Workshops); IEEE; Mar. 24, 2014; pp. 629-634. |
Gilda, et al, “Blockchain for Student Data Privacy and Consent,” 2018 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics, Jan. 4-6, 2018, IEEE, pp. 1-5 (Year: 2018). |
Golfarelli et al, “Beyond Data Warehousing: What's Next in Business Intelligence?,” ACM, pp. 1-6 (Year: 2004). |
Goni, Kyriaki, “Deletion Process_Only you can see my history: Investigating Digital Privacy, Digital Oblivion, and Control on Personal Data Through an Interactive Art Installation,” ACM, 2016, retrieved online on Oct. 3, 2019, pp. 324-333. Retrieved from the Internet URL: http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/2920000/291. |
Gowadia et al, “RDF Metadata for XML Access Control,” ACM, pp. 31-48 (Year: 2003). |
Grolinger, et al, “Data Management in Cloud Environments: NoSQL and NewSQL Data Stores,” Journal of Cloud Computing: Advances, Systems and Applications, pp. 1-24 (Year: 2013). |
Guo, et al, “OPAL: A Passe-partout for Web Forms,” ACM, pp. 353-356 (Year: 2012). |
Gustarini, et al, “Evaluation of Challenges in Human Subject Studies “In-the-Wild” Using Subjects' Personal Smartphones,” ACM, pp. 1447-1456 (Year: 2013). |
Hacigümüs, Hakan, et al, Executing SQL over Encrypted Data in the Database-Service-Provider Model, ACM, Jun. 4, 2002, pp. 216-227. |
Hauch, et al, “Information Intelligence: Metadata for Information Discovery, Access, and Integration,” ACM, pp. 793-798 (Year: 2005). |
Hernandez, et al, “Data Exchange with Data-Metadata Translations,” ACM, pp. 260-273 (Year: 2008). |
Hinde, “A Model to Assess Organisational Information Privacy Maturity Against the Protection of Personal Information Act” Dissertation University of Cape Town 2014, pp. 1-121 (Year: 2014). |
Hodge, et al, “Managing Virtual Data Marts with Metapointer Tables,” pp. 1-7 (Year: 2002). |
Horrall et al, “Evaluating Risk: IBM's Country Financial Risk and Treasury Risk Scorecards,” Jul. 21, 2014, IBM, vol. 58, issue 4, pp. 2:1-2:9 (Year: 2014). |
Hu, et al, “Attribute Considerations for Access Control Systems,” NIST Special Publication 800-205, Jun. 2019, pp. 1-42 (Year: 2019). |
Hu, et al, “Guide to Attribute Based Access Control (ABAC) Definition and Considerations (Draft),” NIST Special Publication 800-162, pp. 1-54 (Year: 2013). |
Huang, et al, “A Study on Information Security Management with Personal Data Protection,” IEEE, Dec. 9, 2011, pp. 624-630 (Year: 2011). |
Huner et al, “Towards a Maturity Model for Corporate Data Quality Management”, ACM, pp. 231-238, 2009 (Year: 2009). |
Hunton & Williams LLP, The Role of Risk Management in Data Protection, Privacy Risk Framework and the Risk-based Approach to Privacy, Centre for Information Policy Leadership, Workshop II, Nov. 23, 2014. |
Huo et al, “A Cloud Storage Architecture Model for Data-lntensive Applications,” IEEE, pp. 1-4 (Year: 2011). |
IAPP, Daily Dashboard, PIA Tool Stocked With New Templates for DPI, Infosec, International Association of Privacy Professionals, Apr. 22, 2014. |
IAPP, ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management Template, Resource Center, International Association of Privacy Professionals. |
Imran et al, “Searching in Cloud Object Storage by Using a Metadata Model”, IEEE, 2014, retrieved online on Apr. 1, 2020, pp. 121-128. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://ieeeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp? (Year: 2014). |
Islam, et al, “Mixture Model Based Label Association Techniques for Web Accessibility,” ACM, pp. 67-76 (Year: 2010). |
Joel Reardon et al., Secure Data Deletion from Persistent Media, ACM, Nov. 4, 2013, retrieved online on Jun. 13, 2019, pp. 271-283. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/2520000/2516699/p271-reardon.pdf? (Year: 2013). |
Joonbakhsh et al, “Mining and Extraction of Personal Software Process measures through IDE Interaction logs,” ACM/IEEE, 2018, retrieved online on Dec. 2, 2019, pp. 78-81. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/3200000/3196462/p78-joonbakhsh.pdf? (Year: 2018). |
Jun et al, “Scalable Multi-Access Flash Store for Big Data Analytics,” ACM, pp. 55-64 (Year: 2014). |
Kirkham, et al, “A Personal Data Store for an Internet of Subjects,” IEEE, pp. 92-97 (Year: 2011). |
Korba, Larry et al.; “Private Data Discovery for Privacy Compliance in Collaborative Environments”; Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering; Springer Berlin Heidelberg; Sep. 21, 2008; pp. 142-150. |
Krol, Kat, et al, Control versus Effort in Privacy Warnings for Webforms, ACM, Oct. 24, 2016, pp. 13-23. |
Lamb et al, “Role-Based Access Control for Data Service Integration”, ACM, pp. 3-11 (Year: 2006). |
Leadbetter, et al, “Where Big Data Meets Linked Data: Applying Standard Data Models to Environmental Data Streams,” IEEE, pp. 2929-2937 (Year: 2016). |
Lebeau, Franck, et al, “Model-Based Vulnerability Testing for Web Applications,” 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops, pp. 445-452, IEEE, 2013 (Year: 2013). |
Li, Ninghui, et al, t-Closeness: Privacy Beyond k-Anonymity and I-Diversity, IEEE, 2014, p. 106-115. |
Final Office Action, dated Apr. 23, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/572,347. |
Final Office Action, dated Apr. 27, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/068,454. |
Final Office Action, dated Apr. 7, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/595,327. |
Final Office Action, dated Aug. 10, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/791,589. |
Final Office Action, dated Aug. 28, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/410,336. |
Final Office Action, dated Aug. 5, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/719,071. |
Final Office Action, dated Dec. 7, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,956. |
Final Office Action, dated Dec. 9, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/410,336. |
Final Office Action, dated Feb. 19, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/404,491. |
Final Office Action, dated Feb. 3, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,392. |
Final Office Action, dated Feb. 8, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/927,658. |
Final Office Action, dated Jan. 17, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,278. |
Final Office Action, dated Jan. 21, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/410,762. |
Final Office Action, dated Jan. 23, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,479. |
Final Office Action, dated Jan. 23, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/505,430. |
Final Office Action, dated Jul. 21, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/151,334. |
Final Office Action, dated Jul. 7, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/149,421. |
Final Office Action, dated Mar. 26, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/020,275. |
Final Office Action, dated Mar. 5, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/055,961. |
Final Office Action, dated Mar. 6, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/595,342. |
Final Office Action, dated May 14, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/013,756. |
Final Office Action, dated Nov. 29, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,237. |
Final Office Action, dated Sep. 21, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/808,493. |
Final Office Action, dated Sep. 21, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,944. |
Final Office Action, dated Sep. 22, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/808,497. |
Final Office Action, dated Sep. 23, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,948. |
Final Office Action, dated Sep. 24, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,952. |
Final Office Action, dated Sep. 25, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/278,119. |
Final Office Action, dated Sep. 28, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/565,395. |
Final Office Action, dated Sep. 8, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/410,866. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 1, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/119,080. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 15, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/161,159. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 18, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/894,819. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 2, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/151,334. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 20, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/812,795. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 22, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/241,710. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 22, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/811,793. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 28, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/798,818. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 28, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/808,500. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 28, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/808,497. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 29, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/791,337. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 5, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/278,119. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 7, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/788,633. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 7, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/791,589. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 13, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/505,430. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 13, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/512,033. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 15, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/505,461. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 19, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/278,122. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 20, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/817,136. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 23, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/626,052. |
Barr, “Amazon Rekognition Update—Estimated Age Range for Faces,” AWS News Blog, Feb. 10, 2017, pp. 1-5 (Year: 2017). |
Everypixel Team, “A New Age Recognition API Detects the Age of People on Photos,” May 20, 2019, pp. 1-5 (Year: 2019). |
Final Office Action, dated Aug. 27, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/161,159. |
Final Office Action, dated Sep. 17, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/200,698. |
International Search Report, dated Sep. 15, 2021, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2021/033631. |
Ma Ziang, et al, “LibRadar: Fast and Accurate Detection of Third-Party Libraries in Android Apps,” 2016 IEEE/ACM 38th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering Companion (ICSE-C), ACM, May 14, 2016, pp. 653-656, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2889160.2889178, p. 653, r.col., par. 1-3; figure 3 (Year: 2016). |
Mandal, et al, “Automated Age Prediction Using Wrinkles Features of Facial Images and Neural Network,” International Journal of Emerging Engineering Research and Technology, vol. 5, Issue 2, Feb. 2017, pp. 12-20 (Year: 2017). |
Martin, et al, “Hidden Surveillance by Web Sites: Web Bugs in Contemporary Use,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 46, No. 12, Dec. 2003, pp. 258-264. Internet source https://doi.org/10.1145/953460.953509 (Year: 2003). |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 12, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/881,832. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 31, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/326,901. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 1, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/196,570. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 1, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/222,556. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 14, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/808,497. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 23, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/068,454. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 24, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/334,939. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 27, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/222,523. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 29, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/316,179. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 9, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/334,909. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 18, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/222,725. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 27, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/187,329. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 27, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/334,948. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 30, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,520. |
Office Action, dated Sep. 15, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/623,157. |
Office Action, dated Sep. 24, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/342,153. |
Regulation (EU) 2016/679, “On the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation),” Official Journal of the European Union, May 4, 2016, pp. L 119/1-L 119/88 (Year: 2016). |
Stack Overflow, “Is there a way to force a user to scroll to the bottom of a div?,” Stack Overflow, pp. 1-11, Nov. 2013. [Online]. Available: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2745935/is-there-a-way-to-force-a-user-to-scroll-to-the-bottom-of-a-div (Year: 2013). |
Tanwar, et al, “Live Forensics Analysis: Violations of Business Security Policy,” 2014 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC31), 2014, pp. 971-976 (Year: 2014). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Sep. 15, 2021, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2021/033631. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 7, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/901,973. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 9, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/882,989. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 10, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/105,602. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 11, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/278,122. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 11, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/593,634. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 12, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/169,643. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 12, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,212. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 12, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,382. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 13, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/512,033. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 15, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/989,086. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 16, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/505,461. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 17, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/034,772. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 18, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/659,437. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 23, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/656,835. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 23, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/068,557. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 3, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/563,749. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 31, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/159,634. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 31, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/404,399. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 4, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/594,670. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 5, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/633,703. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 6, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,451. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 6, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,459. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 7, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/817,136. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 9, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/565,261. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 9, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/404,491. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 10, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/552,765. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 11, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/086,732. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 12, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/572,182. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 13, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/041,563. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 14, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/226,272. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 19, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/159,632. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 19, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/832,451. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 24, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/034,355. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 24, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/068,198. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 24, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/101,106. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 24, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/101,253. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 25, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/714,355. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 25, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/106,469. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 26, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/139,650. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 27, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/041,468. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 27, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/226,290. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 3, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/827,039. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 3, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/068,558. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 1, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/026,727. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 14, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/277,715. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 15, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/030,714. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 18, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,478. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 18, 2019 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/159,635. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 2, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/410,296. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 23, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,251. |
Bjorn Greif, “Cookie Pop-up Blocker: Cliqz Automatically Denies Consent Requests,” Cliqz.com, pp. 1-9, Aug. 11, 2019 (Year: 2019). |
Final Office Action, dated Dec. 10, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/187,329. |
He et al, “A Crowdsourcing Framework for Detecting of Cross-Browser Issues in Web Application,” ACM, pp. 1-4, Nov. 6, 2015 (Year: 2015). |
International Search Report, dated Dec. 22, 2021, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2021/051217. |
Jones et al, “AI and the Ethics of Automating Consent,” IEEE, pp. 64-72, May 2018 (Year: 2018). |
Liu et al, “A Novel Approach for Detecting Browser-based Silent Miner,” IEEE, pp. 490-497 (Year: 2018). |
Lu et al, “An HTTP Flooding Detection Method Based on Browser Behavior,” IEEE, pp. 1151-1154 (Year: 2006). |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 13, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/908,081. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 13, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/347,853. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 2, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/901,654. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 8, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/397,472. |
Nouwens et al, “Dark Patterns after the GDPR: Scraping Consent Pop-ups and Demonstrating their Influence,” ACM, pp. 1-13, Apr. 25, 2020 (Year: 2020). |
Office Action, dated Dec. 13, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/476,209. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 17, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/499,582. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 2, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/504,102. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 27, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/493,332. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 29, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/479,807. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 7, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/499,609. |
Paes, “Student Research Abstract: Automatic Detection of Cross-Browser Incompatibilities using Machine Learning and Screenshot Similarity,” ACM, pp. 697-698, Apr. 3, 2017 (Year: 2017). |
Restriction Requirement, dated Dec. 17, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/475,244. |
Shahriar et al, “A Model-Based Detection of Vulnerable and Malicious Browser Extensions,” IEEE, pp. 198-207 (Year: 2013). |
Sjosten et al, “Discovering Browser Extensions via Web Accessible Resources,” ACM, pp. 329-336, Mar. 22, 2017 (Year: 2017). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Dec. 22, 2021, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2021/051217. |
Office Action, dated Jul. 19, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/316,179. |
Office Action, dated Jul. 21, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/256,430. |
Office Action, dated Jul. 21, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/901,654. |
Office Action, dated Jul. 23, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/436,616. |
Office Action, dated Jul. 24, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/404,491. |
Office Action, dated Jul. 27, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/595,342. |
Office Action, dated Jun. 1, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,952. |
Office Action, dated Jun. 24, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/410,336. |
Office Action, dated Jun. 24, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/234,205. |
Office Action, dated Jun. 27, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/404,405. |
Office Action, dated Jun. 7, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/200,698. |
Office Action, dated Jun. 9, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/222,523. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 11, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/220,978. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 12, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/221,153. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 15, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/149,421. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 16, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/719,488. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 17, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/565,395. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 17, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/719,071. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 20, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/778,709. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 23, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/671,444. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 25, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/278,121. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 25, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/701,043. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 25, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/791,006. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 27, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/278,120. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 30, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/894,890. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 30, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/896,790. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 30, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/151,399. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 4, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/237,083. |
Office Action, dated May 14, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/808,497. |
Office Action, dated May 14, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/808,503. |
Office Action, dated May 15, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/808,493. |
Office Action, dated May 16, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/882,989. |
Office Action, dated May 17, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/277,539. |
Office Action, dated May 18, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/196,570. |
Office Action, dated May 2, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/894,809. |
Office Action, dated May 2, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/104,628. |
Office Action, dated May 29, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,944. |
Office Action, dated May 29, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,948. |
Office Action, dated May 29, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/863,226. |
Office Action, dated May 5, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/410,336. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 1, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/169,658. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 12, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/034,355. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 12, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/034,772. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 15, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/059,911. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 15, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/552,758. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 18, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/560,885. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 18, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/560,889. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 18, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/572,347. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 19, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/595,342. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 20, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/595,327. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 23, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/042,673. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 24, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/925,628. |
Office Action, dated Oct. 10, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/041,563. |
Office Action, dated Oct. 10, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/055,083. |
Office Action, dated Oct. 10, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/055,944. |
Office Action, dated Oct. 14, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/927,658. |
Office Action, dated Oct. 15, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/054,780. |
Office Action, dated Oct. 16, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,392. |
Office Action, dated Oct. 16, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/808,489. |
Office Action, dated Oct. 23, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/055,961. |
Office Action, dated Oct. 26, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/041,468. |
Office Action, dated Oct. 8, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/552,765. |
Office Action, dated Sep. 1, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,459. |
Office Action, dated Sep. 11, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,375. |
Office Action, dated Sep. 11, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,478. |
Office Action, dated Sep. 16, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/277,715. |
Office Action, dated Sep. 19, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/671,073. |
Office Action, dated Sep. 22, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,278. |
Office Action, dated Sep. 4, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/989,086. |
Office Action, dated Sep. 5, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,469. |
Office Action, dated Sep. 6, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,479. |
Office Action, dated Sep. 7, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/633,703. |
Office Action, dated Sep. 8, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,251. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 12, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/256,419. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 17, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/593,639. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 19, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/164,029. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 2, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/160,577. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 2, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/162,006. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 22, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/163,701. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 25, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/883,041. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 28, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/135,445. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 28, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/181,828. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 29, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/700,049. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 30, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/565,265. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 30, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/820,346. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 30, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/410,762. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 8, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/228,250. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 8, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/791,348. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 9, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/791,075. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 10, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/671,444. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 10, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/788,633. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 12, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/719,488. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 14, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/989,416. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 18, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,455. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 20, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/241,710. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 24, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,479. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 26, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/443,374. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 26, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/808,503. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 28, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/278,120. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 30, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/996,208. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 21, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/404,405. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 21, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/834,812. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 3, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/511,700. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 12, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/512,011. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 13, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/894,809. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 13, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/894,890. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 16, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/915,097. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 17, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/863,226. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 18, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/,894,819. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 18, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/041,545. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 18, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/812,795. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 23, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/811,793. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 25, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/983,536. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 27, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/626,052. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 28, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/041,520. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 4, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/883,041. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 4, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/808,500. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 4, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/901,662. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Apr. 10, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/277,715. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Apr. 13, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/817,136. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Apr. 24, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/278,122. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Aug. 7, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/410,866. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Aug. 9, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/404,399. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Dec. 31, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/169,668. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Dec. 9, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/565,395. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Jan. 18, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/256,430. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Jul. 28, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/169,658. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Jun. 15, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/187,329. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Jun. 15, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/222,556. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Jun. 9, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/222,725. |
Restriction Requirement, dated May 5, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/808,489. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Nov. 15, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/586,202. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Nov. 21, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/254,901. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Nov. 5, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/563,744. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Oct. 17, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/055,984. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Sep. 15, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/925,628. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Sep. 9, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/505,426. |
Advisory Action, dated Jan. 13, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/808,493. |
Advisory Action, dated Jan. 13, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,944. |
Advisory Action, dated Jan. 13, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,948. |
Advisory Action, dated Jan. 13, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,952. |
Advisory Action, dated Jan. 6, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/808,497. |
Advisory Action, dated Jun. 19, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/595,342. |
Advisory Action, dated Jun. 2, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/404,491. |
Advisory Action, dated May 21, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,392. |
International Search Report, dated Aug. 15, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036919. |
International Search Report, dated Aug. 21, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036914. |
International Search Report, dated Aug. 29, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036898. |
International Search Report, dated Aug. 8, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036889. |
International Search Report, dated Aug. 8, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036890. |
Final Office Action, dated Apr. 1, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/370,650. |
Final Office Action, dated Apr. 5, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/013,756. |
International Search Report, dated Apr. 12, 2022, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2022/016735. |
International Search Report, dated Feb. 14, 2022, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2021/058274. |
International Search Report, dated Mar. 18, 2022, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2022/013733. |
Lewis, James et al, “Microservices,” Mar. 25, 2014 (Mar. 25, 2014),XP055907494, Retrieved from the Internet: https://martinfowler.com/articles/micr oservices.html. [retrieved on Mar. 31, 2022]. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 4, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/493,332. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 4, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/572,298. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 31, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/476,209. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 8, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,509. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Apr. 12, 2022, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2022/016735. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Feb. 14, 2022, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2021/058274. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Mar. 18, 2022, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2022/013733. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Apr. 12, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/584,187. |
Ali et al, “Age Estimation from Facial Images Using Biometric Ratios and Wrinkle Analysis,” IEEE, 2015, pp. 1-5 (Year: 2015). |
Chang et al, “A Ranking Approach for Human Age Estimation Based on Face Images,” IEEE, 2010, pp. 3396-3399 (Year: 2010). |
Edinger et al, “Age and Gender Estimation of Unfiltered Faces,” IEEE, 2014, pp. 2170-2179 (Year: 2014). |
Final Office Action, dated Apr. 25, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/149,421. |
Han et al, “Demographic Estimation from Face Images: Human vs. Machine Performance,” IEEE, 2015, pp. 1148-1161 (Year: 2015). |
Huettner, “Digital Risk Management: Protecting Your Privacy, Improving Security, and Preparing for Emergencies,” IEEE, pp. 136-138 (Year: 2006). |
Jayasinghe et al, “Matching Facial Images Using Age Related Morphing Changes,” ISSRI, 2009, pp. 2901-2907 (Year: 2009). |
Khan et al, “Wrinkles Energy Based Age Estimation Using Discrete Cosine Transform,” IEEE, 2015, pp. 1-4 (Year: 2015). |
Kristian et al, “Human Facial Age Classification Using Active Shape Module, Geometrical Feature, and Support Vendor Machine on Early Growth Stage,” ISICO, 2015, pp. 1-8 (Year: 2015). |
Liu et al, “Overview on Ontology Mapping and Approach,” IEEE, pp. 592-595 (Year: 2011). |
Milic et al, “Comparative Analysis of Metadata Models on e-Government Open Data Platforms,” IEEE, pp. 119-130 (Year: 2021). |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 12, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/479,807. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 14, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/572,276. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 20, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/573,808. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 27, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/573,999. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 28, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/670,352. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 12, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/670,341. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 18, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/670,349. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 25, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/588,645. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 26, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/151,334. |
Qu et al, “Metadata Type System: Integrate Presentation, Data Models and Extraction to Enable Exploratory Browsing Interfaces,” ACM, pp. 107-116 (Year: 2014). |
Shulz et al, “Generative Data Models for Validation and Evaluation of Visualization Techniques,” ACM, pp. 1-13 (Year: 2016). |
Final Office Action, dated Apr. 28, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/925,550. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 28, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/592,922. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 29, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/387,421. |
Liu et al, “Cross-Geography Scientific Data Transferring Trends and Behavior,” ACM, pp. 267-278 (Year: 2018). |
Liu, Kun, et al, A Framework for Computing the Privacy Scores of Users in Online Social Networks, ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, vol. 5, No. 1, Article 6, Dec. 2010, 30 pages. |
Liu, Yandong, et al, “Finding the Right Consumer: Optimizing for Conversion in Display Advertising Campaigns,” Proceedings of the Fifth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, Feb. 2, 2012, pp. 473-428 (Year: 2012). |
Lizar et al, “Usable Consents: Tracking and Managing Use of Personal Data with a Consent Transaction Receipt,” Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication, 2014, pp. 647-652 (Year: 2014). |
Luu, et al, “Combined Local and Holistic Facial Features for Age-Determination,” 2010 11th Int. Conf. Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision, Singapore, Dec. 7, 2010, IEEE, pp. 900-904 (Year: 2010). |
Maret et al, “Multimedia Information Interchange: Web Forms Meet Data Servers”, IEEE, pp. 499-505 (Year: 1999). |
McGarth et al, “Digital Library Technology for Locating and Accessing Scientific Data”, ACM, pp. 188-194 (Year: 1999). |
Mesbah et al, “Crawling Ajax-Based Web Applications Through Dynamic Analysis of User Interface State Changes,” ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB) vol. 6, No. 1, Article 3, Mar. 2012, pp. 1-30 (Year: 2012). |
Moiso et al, “Towards a User-Centric Personal Data Ecosystem the Role of the Bank of Individual's Data,” 2012 16th International Conference on Intelligence in Next Generation Networks, Berlin, 2012, pp. 202-209 (Year: 2012). |
Moscoso-Zea et al, “Datawarehouse Design for Educational Data Mining,” IEEE, pp. 1-6 (Year: 2016). |
Mudepalli et al, “An efficient data retrieval approach using blowfish encryption on cloud CipherText Retrieval in Cloud Computing” IEEE, pp. 267-271 (Year: 2017). |
Mundada et al, “Half-Baked Cookies: Hardening Cookie-Based Authentication for the Modern Web,” Proceedings of the 11th ACM on Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2016, pp. 675-685 (Year: 2016). |
Newman et al, “High Speed Scientific Data Transfers using Software Defined Networking,” ACM, pp. 1-9 (Year: 2015). |
Newman, “Email Archive Overviews using Subject Indexes”, ACM, pp. 652-653, 2002 (Year: 2002). |
Nishikawa, Taiji, English Translation of JP 2019154505, Aug. 27, 2019 (Year: 2019). |
Notice of Filing Date for Petition for Post-Grant Review of related U.S. Pat. No. 9,691,090 dated Apr. 12, 2018. |
O'Keefe et al, “Privacy-Preserving Data Linkage Protocols,” Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, 2004, pp. 94-102 (Year: 2004). |
Olenski, Steve, For Consumers, Data Is a Matter of Trust, CMO Network, Apr. 18, 2016, https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveolenski/2016/04/18/for-consumers-data-is-a-matter-of-trust/#2e48496278b3. |
Pechenizkiy et al, “Process Mining Online Assessment Data,” Educational Data Mining, pp. 279-288 (Year: 2009). |
Petition for Post-Grant Review of related U.S. Pat. No. 9,691,090 dated Mar. 27, 2018. |
Petrie et al, “The Relationship between Accessibility and Usability of Websites”, ACM, pp. 397-406 (Year: 2007). |
Pfeifle, Sam, The Privacy Advisor, IAPP and AvePoint Launch New Free PIA Tool, International Association of Privacy Professionals, Mar. 5, 2014. |
Pfeifle, Sam, The Privacy Advisor, IAPP Heads to Singapore with APIA Template in Tow, International Association of Privacy Professionals, https://iapp.org/news/a/iapp-heads-to-singapore-with-apia-template_in_tow/, Mar. 28, 2014, p. 1-3. |
Ping et al, “Wide Area Placement of Data Replicas for Fast and Highly Available Data Access,” ACM, pp. 1-8 (Year: 2011). |
Popescu-Zeletin, “The Data Access and Transfer Support in a Local Heterogeneous Network (HMINET)”, IEEE, pp. 147-152 (Year: 1979). |
Porter, “De-Identified Data and Third Party Data Mining: The Risk of Re-Identification of Personal Information,” Shidler JL Com. & Tech. 5, 2008, pp. 1-9 (Year: 2008). |
Pretorius, et al, “Attributing Users Based on Web Browser History,” 2017 IEEE Conference on Application, Information and Network Security (AINS), 2017, pp. 69-74 (Year: 2017). |
Qing-Jiang et al, “The (P, a, K) Anonymity Model for Privacy Protection of Personal Information in the Social Networks,” 2011 6th IEEE Joint International Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Conference, vol. 2 IEEE, 2011, pp. 420-423 (Year: 2011). |
Qiu, et al, “Design and Application of Data Integration Platform Based on Web Services and XML,” IEEE, pp. 253-256 (Year: 2016). |
Radu, et al, “Analyzing Risk Evaluation Frameworks and Risk Assessment Methods,” IEEE, Dec. 12, 2020, pp. 1-6 (Year: 2020). |
Reardon et al., User-Level Secure Deletion on Log-Structured File Systems, ACM, 2012, retrieved online on Apr. 22, 2021, pp. 1-11. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download; isessionid=450713515DC7F19F8ED09AE961D4B60E. (Year: 2012). |
Rozepz, “What is Google Privacy Checkup? Everything You Need to Know,” Tom's Guide web post, Apr. 26, 2018, pp. 1-11 (Year: 2018). |
Salim et al, “Data Retrieval and Security using Lightweight Directory Access Protocol”, IEEE, pp. 685-688 (Year: 2009). |
Santhisree, et al, “Web Usage Data Clustering Using Dbscan Algorithm and Set Similarities,” IEEE, pp. 220-224 (Year: 2010). |
Sanzo et al, “Analytical Modeling of Lock-Based Concurrency Control with Arbitrary Transaction Data Access Patterns,” ACM, pp. 69-78 (Year: 2010). |
Schwartz, Edward J., et al, 2010 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy: All You Ever Wanted to Know About Dynamic Analysis and forward Symbolic Execution (but might have been afraid to ask), Carnegie Mellon University, IEEE Computer Society, 2010, p. 317-331. |
Sedinic et al, “Security Risk Management in Complex Organization,” May 29, 2015, IEEE, pp. 1331-1337 (Year: 2015). |
Singh, et al, “A Metadata Catalog Service for Data Intensive Applications,” ACM, pp. 1-17 (Year: 2003). |
Slezak, et al, “Brighthouse: An Analytic Data Warehouse for Ad-hoc Queries,” ACM, pp. 1337-1345 (Year: 2008). |
Soceanu, et al, “Managing the Privacy and Security of eHealth Data,” May 29, 2015, IEEE, pp. 1-8 (Year: 2015). |
Srinivasan et al, “Descriptive Data Analysis of File Transfer Data,” ACM, pp. 1-8 (Year: 2014). |
Srivastava, Agrima, et al, Measuring Privacy Leaks in Online Social Networks, International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), 2013. |
Stern, Joanna, “iPhone Privacy Is Broken . . . and Apps Are to Blame”, The Wall Street Journal, wsj.com, May 31, 2019. |
Strodl, et al, “Personal & SOHO Archiving,” Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria, JCDL '08, Jun. 16-20, 2008, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 115-123 (Year: 2008). |
Sukumar et al, “Review on Modern Data Preprocessing Techniques in Web Usage Mining (WUM),” IEEE, 2016, pp. 64-69 (Year: 2016). |
Symantec, Symantex Data Loss Prevention—Discover, monitor, and protect confidential data; 2008; Symantec Corporation; http://www.mssuk.com/images/Symantec%2014552315_IRC_BR_DLP_03.09_sngl.pdf. |
Tanasa et al, “Advanced Data Preprocessing for Intersites Web Usage Mining,” IEEE, Mar. 2004, pp. 59-65 (Year: 2004). |
The Cookie Collective, Optanon Cookie Policy Generator, The Cookie Collective, Year 2016, http://web.archive.org/web/20160324062743/https:/optanon.com/. |
Thuraisingham, “Security Issues for the Semantic Web,” Proceedings 27th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, COMPSAC 2003, Dallas, TX, USA, 2003, pp. 633-638 (Year: 2003). |
TRUSTe Announces General Availability of Assessment Manager for Enterprises to Streamline Data Privacy Management with Automation, PRNewswire, Mar. 4, 2015. |
International Search Report, dated Feb. 11, 2022, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2021/053518. |
Jiahao Chen et al. “Fairness Under Unawareness: Assessing Disparity when Protected Class is Unobserved,” arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, Nov. 27, 2018 (Nov. 27, 2018), Section 2, Figure 2. (Year 2018). |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 1, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/346,509. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 14, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/623,157. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 22, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/535,065. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 4, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/520,272. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 8, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/342,153. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 31, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/472,948. |
Office Action, dated Feb. 16, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/872,031. |
Office Action, dated Feb. 9, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/543,546. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 31, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/493,290. |
Sarkar et al, “Towards Enforcement of the EU GDPR: Enabling Data Erasure,” 2018 IEEE Confs on Internet of Things, Green Computing and Communications, Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, Smart Data, Blockchain, Computer and Information Technology, Congress on Cybermatics, 2018, pp. 222-229, IEEE (Year: 2018). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Feb. 11, 2022, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2021/053518. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Mar. 4, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/055773. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Mar. 4, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/055774. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Nov. 19, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/046939. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Oct. 11, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/043975. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Oct. 11, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/043976. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Oct. 11, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/043977. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Oct. 11, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/044026. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Oct. 11, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/045240. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Oct. 12, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036888. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Oct. 12, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/044046. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Oct. 16, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/045243. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Oct. 18, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/045249. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Oct. 20, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036917. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Oct. 3, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036912. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Sep. 1, 2017, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/036896. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Sep. 12, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/037504. |
Abdullah et al, “The Mapping Process of Unstructured Data to the Structured Data”, ACM, pp. 151-155 (Year: 2013). |
Acar, Gunes, et al, The Web Never Forgets, Computer and Communications Security, ACM, Nov. 3, 2014, pp. 674-689. |
Aghasian, Erfan, et al, Scoring Users' Privacy Disclosure Across Multiple Online Social Networks,IEEE Access, Multidisciplinary Rapid Review Open Access Journal, Jul. 31, 2017, vol. 5, 2017. |
Agosti et al, “Access and Exchange of Hierarchically Structured Resources on the Web with the NESTOR Framework”, IEEE, pp. 659-662 (Year: 2009). |
Agrawal et al, “Securing Electronic Health Records Without Impeding the Flow of Information,” International Journal of Medical Informatics 76, 2007, pp. 471-479 (Year: 2007). |
Ahmad et al, “Task-Oriented Access Model for Secure Data Sharing Over Cloud,” ACM, pp. 1-7 (Year: 2015). |
Ahmad, et al, “Performance of Resource Management Algorithms for Processable Bulk Data Transfer Tasks in Grid Environments,” ACM, pp. 177-188 (Year: 2008). |
Alaa et al, “Personalized Risk Scoring for Critical Care Prognosis Using Mixtures of Gaussian Processes,” Apr. 27, 2017, IEEE, vol. 65, issue 1, pp. 207-217 (Year: 2017). |
Antunes et al, “Preserving Digital Data in Heterogeneous Environments”, ACM, pp. 345-348, 2009 (Year: 2009). |
Ardagna, et al, “A Privacy-Aware Access Control System,” Journal of Computer Security, 16:4, pp. 369-397 (Year: 2008). |
AvePoint, Automating Privacy Impact Assessments, AvePoint, Inc. |
AvePoint, AvePoint Privacy Impact Assessment 1: User Guide, Cumulative Update 2, Revision E, Feb. 2015, AvePoint, Inc. |
AvePoint, Installing and Configuring the APIA System, International Association of Privacy Professionals, AvePoint, Inc. |
Ball, et al, “Aspects of the Computer-Based Patient Record,” Computers in Healthcare, Springer-Verlag New York Inc., pp. 1-23 (Year: 1992). |
Bang et al, “Building an Effective and Efficient Continuous Web Application Security Program,” 2016 International Conference on Cyber Security Situational Awareness, Data Analytics and Assessment (CyberSA), London, 2016, pp. 1-4 (Year: 2016). |
Barker, “Personalizing Access Control by Generalizing Access Control,” ACM, pp. 149-158 (Year: 2010). |
Bayardo et al, “Technological Solutions for Protecting Privacy,” Computer 36.9 (2003), pp. 115-118, (Year: 2003). |
Berezovskiy et al, “A framework for dynamic data source identification and orchestration on the Web”, ACM, pp. 1-8 (Year: 2010). |
Bertino et al, “On Specifying Security Policies for Web Documents with an XML-based Language,” ACM, pp. 57-65 (Year: 2001). |
Bhargav-Spantzel et al., Receipt Management—Transaction History based Trust Establishment, 2007, ACM, p. 82-91. |
Bhuvaneswaran et al, “Redundant Parallel Data Transfer Schemes for the Grid Environment”, ACM, pp. 18 (Year: 2006). |
Bieker, et al, “Privacy-Preserving Authentication Solutions—Best Practices for Implementation and EU Regulatory Perspectives,” Oct. 29, 2014, IEEE, pp. 1-10 (Year: 2014). |
Binns, et al, “Data Havens, or Privacy Sans Frontieres? A Study of International Personal Data Transfers,” ACM, pp. 273-274 (Year: 2002). |
Brandt et al, “Efficient Metadata Management in Large Distributed Storage Systems,” IEEE, pp. 1-9 (Year: 2003). |
Byun, Ji-Won, Elisa Bertino, and Ninghui Li. “Purpose based access control of complex data for privacy protection.” Proceedings of the tenth ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies. ACM, 2005. (Year: 2005). |
Carminati et al, “Enforcing Access Control Over Data Streams,” ACM, pp. 21-30 (Year: 2007). |
Carpineto et al, “Automatic Assessment of Website Compliance to the European Cookie Law with CooLCheck,” Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, 2016, pp. 135-138 (Year: 2016). |
Cerpzone, “How to Access Data on Data Archival Storage and Recovery System”, https://www.saj.usace.army.mil/Portals/44/docs/Environmental/Lake%20O%20Watershed/15February2017/How%20To%20Access%20Model%20Data%20on%20DASR.pdf?ver=2017-02-16-095535-633, Feb. 16, 2017. |
Cha et al, “A Data-Driven Security Risk Assessment Scheme for Personal Data Protection,” IEEE, pp. 50510-50517 (Year: 2018). |
Cha, et al, “Process-Oriented Approach for Validating Asset Value for Evaluating Information Security Risk,” IEEE, Aug. 31, 2009, pp. 379-385 (Year: 2009). |
Chapados et al, “Scoring Models for Insurance Risk Sharing Pool Optimization,” 2008, IEEE, pp. 97-105 (Year: 2008). |
Cheng, Raymond, et al, “Radiatus: A Shared-Nothing Server-Side Web Architecture,” Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, Oct. 5, 2016, pp. 237-250 (Year: 2016). |
Choi et al, “Retrieval Effectiveness of Table of Contents and Subject Headings,” ACM, pp. 103-104 (Year: 2007). |
Chowdhury et al, “A System Architecture for Subject-Centric Data Sharing”, ACM, pp. 1-10 (Year: 2018). |
Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 1, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/340,395. |
Office Action, dated Oct. 12, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/346,509. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Oct. 6, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/340,699. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 24, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/169,643. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 24, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,451. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 24, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/595,327. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 27, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/410,296. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 29, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,237. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 30, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,212. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 30, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,382. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 6, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/404,491. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 6, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,956. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 11, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/578,712. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 14, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/104,393. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 15, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/256,419. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 16, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/563,754. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 16, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/565,265. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 16, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/020,275. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 18, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/030,714. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 19, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/410,866. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 2, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/560,963. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 23, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/593,639. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 24, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/068,454. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 3, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/055,998. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 31, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/160,577. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 8, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/013,758. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 8, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/068,198. |
Office Action, dated Feb. 10, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,944. |
Office Action, dated Feb. 10, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/106,469. |
Office Action, dated Feb. 15, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/220,899. |
Office Action, dated Feb. 17, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,948. |
Office Action, dated Feb. 18, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,952. |
Office Action, dated Feb. 2, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/101,915. |
Office Action, dated Feb. 26, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/228,250. |
Office Action, dated Feb. 3, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/013,757. |
Office Action, dated Feb. 5, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/586,202. |
Office Action, dated Feb. 6, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/707,762. |
Office Action, dated Feb. 8, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/139,650. |
Office Action, dated Feb. 9, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/808,493. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 18, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/055,984. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 22, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/099,270. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 24, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/505,426. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 24, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/700,049. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 27, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/656,895. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 28, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/712,104. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 29, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/101,106. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 4, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/159,566. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 4, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/159,628. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 4, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/013,756. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 7, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/572,182. |
Office Action, dated Jul. 13, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/306,496. |
Office Action, dated Jul. 15, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/020,275. |
Office Action, dated Jul. 18, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/410,762. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 25, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/410,336. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 26, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,469. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 29, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/278,119. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 6, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/595,327. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 8, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/600,879. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 10, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/237,083. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 10, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/403,358. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 12, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/278,121. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 14, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/701,043. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 15, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/791,006. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 16, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/901,979. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 17, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/055,961. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 17, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/778,709. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 19, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/306,252. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 21, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,392. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 23, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/220,978. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 26, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/409,673. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 31, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/221,153. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 8, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/201,040. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 1, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/813,321. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 11, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,948. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 11, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,952. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 11, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/216,436. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 12, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/278,123. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 12, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/363,454. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 16, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/798,818. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 17, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/656,895. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 18, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/410,566. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 19, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/894,890. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 19, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/042,673. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 19, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/055,984. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 2, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/198,581. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 21, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/404,439. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 22, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/791,337. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 27, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/882,989. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 4, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/159,566. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 5, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/220,899. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 5, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/357,260. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 6, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/875,570. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 6, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/159,628. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 7, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/099,270. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 8, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/712,104. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 1, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/853,674. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 1, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/059,911. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 10, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/925,628. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 10, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/128,666. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 13, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/055,083. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 14, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/055,944. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 16, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/778,704. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 16, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/149,380. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 17, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/560,885. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 18, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/560,963. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 19, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/013,757. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 2, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/858,802. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 24, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/552,758. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 25, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/054,780. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 26, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/560,889. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 26, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/578,712. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 27, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/226,280. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 29, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/055,998. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 31, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/563,744. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 31, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/013,758. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 31, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/162,205. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 1, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/586,202. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 11, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/786,196. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 13, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/101,915. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 19, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/505,430. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 19, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/808,496. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 20, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/707,762. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 21, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/896,790. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 26, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/808,493. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 26, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/865,874. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 26, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/199,514. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 27, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/820,208. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 27, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/927,658. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 27, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/198,757. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 28, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/277,568. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 28, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/799,279. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 28, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,944. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 5, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/254,901. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 5, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/563,754. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 7, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/505,426. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 7, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/194,662. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 14, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/436,616. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 2, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/054,762. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 23, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/791,589. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 24, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/027,019. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 25, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/019,771. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 26, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/563,735. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 27, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/570,712. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 27, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/577,634. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 3, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/719,071. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 5, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/560,965. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 7, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/671,073. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 8, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/042,642. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 9, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/595,342. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 10, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/277,539. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 17, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/896,790. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 17, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/054,672. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 17, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/563,741. |
Aman et al, “Detecting Data Tampering Attacks in Synchrophasor Networks using Time Hopping,” IEEE, pp. 1-6 (Year: 2016). |
Bertino et al, “Towards Mechanisms for Detection and Prevention of Data Exfiltration by Insiders,” Mar. 22, 2011, ACM, pp. 10-19 (Year: 2011). |
Bujlow et al, “Web Tracking: Mechanisms, Implications, and Defenses,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Aug. 1, 2017, vol. 5, No. 8, pp. 1476-1510 (Year: 2017). |
Fan et al, “Intrusion Investigations with Data-hiding for Computer Log-file Forensics,” IEEE, pp. 1-6 (Year: 2010). |
Final Office Action, dated Oct. 26, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/306,496. |
Final Office Action, dated Oct. 28, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/234,205. |
Final Office Action, dated Oct. 29, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/020,275. |
Gonçalves et al, “The XML Log Standard for Digital Libraries: Analysis, Evolution, and Deployment,” IEEE, pp. 312-314 (Year: 2003). |
International Search Report, dated Nov. 12, 2021, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2021/043481. |
International Search Report, dated Nov. 3, 2021, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2021/040893. |
International Search Report, dated Nov. 3, 2021, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2021/044910. |
Iordanou et al, “Tracing Cross Border Web Tracking,” Oct. 31, 2018, pp. 329-342, ACM (Year: 2018). |
Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 16, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/491,871. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 22, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/383,889. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 22, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/346,847. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 10, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/380,485. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 10, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/409,999. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 12, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/346,586. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 12, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/373,444. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 16, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/370,650. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 16, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/486,350. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 23, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/013,756. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 26, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/925,550. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 4, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/491,906. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 8, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/872,130. |
Office Action, dated Oct. 15, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/908,081. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Nov. 10, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/366,754. |
Roesner et al, “Detecting and Defending Against Third-Party Tracking on the Web,” 9th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, Apr. 11, 2013, pp. 1-14, ACM (Year: 2013). |
Van Eijk et al, “The Impact of User Location on Cookie Notices (Inside and Outside of the European Union,” IEEE Security & Privacy Workshop on Technology and Consumer Protection (CONPRO '19), Jan. 1, 2019 (Year: 2019). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Nov. 12, 2021, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2021/043481. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Nov. 3, 2021, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2021/040893. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Nov. 3, 2021, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2021/044910. |
Bansal et al., “Integrating Big Data: A Semantic Extract-Transform-Load Framework,” IEEE, pp. 42-50 (Year: 2015). |
Bao et al., “Performance Modeling and Workflow Scheduling of Microservice-Based Applications in Clouds,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 30, No. 9, Sep. 2019, pp. 2101-2116 (Year: 2019). |
Bindschaedler et al., “Privacy Through Fake Yet Semantically Real Traces,” arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853, May 27, 2015 (Year: 2015). |
Castro et al., “Creating Lightweight Ontologies for Dataset Description,” IEEE, pp. 1-4 (Year: 2014). |
Ex Parte Quayle Action, dated May 10, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/668,714. |
Final Office Action, dated May 12, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/499,624. |
Final Office Action, dated May 16, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/480,377. |
Final Office Action, dated May 2, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/499,595. |
Final Office Action, dated May 24, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/499,582. |
International Search Report, dated May 12, 2022, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2022/015929. |
International Search Report, dated May 17, 2022, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2022/015241. |
International Search Report, dated May 19, 2022, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2022/015637. |
Lasierra et al., “Data Management in Home Scenarios Using an Autonomic Ontology-Based Approach,” IEEE, pp. 94-99 (Year: 2012). |
Lenzerini et al., “Ontology-based Data Management,” ACM, pp. 5-6 (Year: 2011). |
Niu, et al., “Achieving Data Truthfulness and Privacy Preservation in Data Markets”, IEEE Transactions On Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Service Centre, Los Alamitos, CA, US, vol. 31, No. 1, Jan. 1, 2019, pp. 105-119 (Year 2019). |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 18, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/670,354. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 25, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/872,031. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 6, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/666,886. |
Office Action, dated May 12, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/509,974. |
Office Action, dated May 16, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/679,750. |
Office Action, dated May 24, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/674,187. |
Office Action, dated May 9, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/840,943. |
Preuveneers et al., “Access Control with Delegated Authorization Policy Evaluation for Data-Driven Microservice Workflows,” Future Internet 2017, MDPI, pp. 1-21 (Year: 2017). |
Thomas et al., “MooM—A Prototype Framework for Management of Ontology Mappings,” IEEE, pp. 548-555 (Year: 2011). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated May 12, 2022, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2022/015929. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated May 17, 2022, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2022/015241. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated May 19, 2022, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2022/015637. |
Choi et al., “A Survey on Ontology Mapping,” ACM, pp. 34-41 (Year: 2006). |
Cui et al., “Domain Ontology Management Environment,” IEEE, pp. 1-9 (Year: 2000). |
Falbo et al., “An Ontological Approach to Domain Engineering,” ACM, pp. 351-358 (Year: 2002). |
International Search Report, dated Jun. 1, 2022, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2022/016930. |
International Search Report, dated Jun. 22, 2022, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2022/019358. |
Nemec et al., “Assessment of Query Execution Performance Using Selected Business Intelligence Tools and Experimental Agile Oriented Data Modeling Approach,” Sep. 16, 2015, IEEE, pp. 1327-1333. (Year: 2015). |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 14, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/679,734. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 2, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/493,290. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 23, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/588,645. |
Office Action, dated Jun. 14, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/346,586. |
Office Action, dated Jun. 16, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/689,683. |
Ozdikis et al., “Tool Support for Transformation from an OWL Ontology to an HLA Object Model,” ACM, pp. 1-6 (Year: 2010). |
Vukovic et al., “Managing Enterprise IT Systems Using Online Communities,” Jul. 9, 2011, IEEE, pp. 552-559. (Year 2011). |
Wong et al., “Ontology Mapping for the Interoperability Problem in Network Management,” IEEE, pp. 2058-2068 (Year: 2005). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jun. 1, 2022, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2022/016930. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jun. 22, 2022, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2022/019358. |
Cruz et al., “Interactive User Feedback in Ontology Matching Using Signature Vectors,” IEEE, pp. 1321-1324 (Year 2012). |
Cudre-Mauroux, “ESWC 2008 Ph.D. Symposium,” The ESWC 2008 PhD. Symposium is sponsored by the Okkam project (http://fp7.okkam.org/), MIT, pp. 1-92 (Year: 2008). |
Dowling, “Auditing Global HR Compliance,” published May 23, 2014, retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/ global-hr/pages/auditing-global-hr-compliance.aspx Jul. 2, 2022 (Year: 2014). |
Neil et al., “Downsizing and Rightsizing,” https://web.archive.org/web/20130523153311/https://www.referenceforbusiness.com/management/De-Ele/Downsizing-and-Rightsizing.html (Year: 2013). |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 20, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,509. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 7, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/571,871. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 29, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/675,118. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 2, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/670,354. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 4, 2022, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 17/828,953. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220043935 A1 | Feb 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63061894 | Aug 2020 | US |